Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength

vs
industry
vs
history
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth

vs
industry
vs
history

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 15.34
JKL's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
100% of the Companies
in the Global industry.

( Industry Median: vs. JKL: 15.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
JKL' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 0
Current: 15.34
PE(NRI) 15.34
JKL's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
100% of the Companies
in the Global industry.

( Industry Median: vs. JKL: 15.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
JKL' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 0
Current: 15.34
P/B 1.28
JKL's P/B is ranked lower than
100% of the Companies
in the Global industry.

( Industry Median: vs. JKL: 1.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
JKL' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 0
Current: 1.28

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 2.58
JKL's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
100% of the Companies
in the Global industry.

( Industry Median: vs. JKL: 2.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
JKL' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 0
Current: 2.58

More Statistics

Short Percentage of Float0.00%
52-Week Range $82.94 - 128.67
Shares Outstanding (Mil)3,700,000.00
» More Articles for JKL

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Howard Marks: Economies Will Slow Post-Brexit Jun 27 2016 
Observations and Perspectives: Right Back Where We Started From Jun 27 2016 
Great Britain Votes to Leave the European Union: Causeway Capital Commentary Jun 27 2016 
John Rogers Comments on Chesapeake Energy Corp Jun 27 2016 
John Rogers Comments on Lockheed Martin Corp Jun 27 2016 
John Rogers Comments on Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Jun 27 2016 
John Rogers Comments on Stanley Black & Decker Jun 27 2016 
First Eagle Insights: After Brexit Jun 27 2016 
Acadia Healthcare: It Makes Sense to Look Beyond the Brexit Effect Jun 27 2016 
Brexit Briefing: What Others Said Jun 27 2016 

More From Other Websites
Moody’s Rated Tenneco Debt as ‘Ba3’ Jun 07 2016
How Did GNC Holdings’ Segments Fare in 1Q16? May 18 2016
Oshkosh’s Bottom Line Rose in 2Q16 May 13 2016
How Did GNC Holdings’ 1Q16 Earnings Turn Out? May 04 2016
How Did Supervalu Fare with Earnings and Sales Expectations? Apr 29 2016
Why Did Wells Fargo Downgrade Tenneco to ‘Market Perform’? Apr 28 2016
Tenneco’s Top and Bottom Line Rose in 1Q16 Apr 28 2016
Comparing Supervalu’s Stock Market Performance to Its Peers Apr 26 2016
A Look at SVU’s Financial Performance ahead of Fiscal 4Q16 Results Apr 22 2016
Piper Jaffray Downgraded Avon Products to ‘Neutral’ Apr 21 2016
Goldman Sachs Upgraded Energizer Holdings as a ‘Buy’ Apr 05 2016
Cal-Maine Foods’ Performance Rose in 3Q16 Apr 04 2016
Avon Products and Investors Agree to Avoid Proxy Contest Mar 29 2016
Oshkosh’s $243 Million Order from the U.S. Army Mar 24 2016
Why Is Avon Moving Its Head Office to the UK? Mar 21 2016
Macquarie Downgraded Fossil Group to ‘Underperform’ Mar 17 2016
How Does GNC Holdings Compare with Its Peers? Mar 02 2016
How Deeply Did Fossil Group Dig in during 4Q15 and 2015? Feb 18 2016
How Did Avon Products Perform in Its 4Q15 and 2015 Results? Feb 17 2016
4Q15: How Did GNC Holdings’ Segments Perform? Feb 17 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK