Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.47
KO's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
55% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. KO: 0.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
KO' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.26  Med: 0.52 Max: 1.21
Current: 0.47
0.26
1.21
Equity to Asset 0.30
KO's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
78% of the 87 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 0.56 vs. KO: 0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
KO' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.3  Med: 0.44 Max: 0.58
Current: 0.3
0.3
0.58
Interest Coverage 20.10
KO's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
52% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 24.32 vs. KO: 20.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
KO' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 8.26  Med: 19.74 Max: 29.33
Current: 20.1
8.26
29.33
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 3.55
M-Score: -2.90
WACC vs ROIC
2.04%
13.24%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 19.67
KO's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
94% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 6.33 vs. KO: 19.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
KO' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: 18.56  Med: 24.97 Max: 30.5
Current: 19.67
18.56
30.5
Net-margin (%) 16.51
KO's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.63 vs. KO: 16.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
KO' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: 10.95  Med: 18.78 Max: 33.56
Current: 16.51
10.95
33.56
ROE (%) 24.34
KO's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
83% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 7.09 vs. KO: 24.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
KO' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: 22.36  Med: 30.18 Max: 61.49
Current: 24.34
22.36
61.49
ROA (%) 8.06
KO's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 95 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.31 vs. KO: 8.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
KO' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: 7.8  Med: 16.01 Max: 24.99
Current: 8.06
7.8
24.99
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 67.95
KO's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
88% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 14.85 vs. KO: 67.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
KO' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 60.6  Med: 100.04 Max: 243.01
Current: 67.95
60.6
243.01
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 1.10
KO's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
64% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.60 vs. KO: 1.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
KO' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -2.2  Med: 6.70 Max: 16.3
Current: 1.1
-2.2
16.3
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -3.80
KO's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
69% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 2.20 vs. KO: -3.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
KO' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -12.3  Med: 7.70 Max: 19.8
Current: -3.8
-12.3
19.8
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -4.70
KO's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.40 vs. KO: -4.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
KO' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -18.7  Med: 7.70 Max: 26.5
Current: -4.7
-18.7
26.5
» KO's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2014

KO Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Jim Simons 440,600 sh (New)
John Burbank 65,000 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 50,000 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 137,853 sh (+89.10%)
George Soros 100,000 sh (+36.99%)
Dodge & Cox 45,282 sh (+27.76%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 5,390,603 sh (+1.41%)
Chris Davis 6,382 sh (+0.73%)
Ken Fisher 10,138,859 sh (+0.63%)
Tom Gayner 130,000 sh (unchged)
David Winters 2,508,827 sh (unchged)
Wintergreen Fund 1,892,476 sh (unchged)
Pioneer Investments 13,674 sh (unchged)
Warren Buffett 400,000,000 sh (unchged)
Robert Olstein 99,000 sh (unchged)
John Hussman 6,000 sh (unchged)
Jeff Auxier 123,837 sh (-0.12%)
Ray Dalio 343,474 sh (-0.98%)
Tom Russo 205,187 sh (-1.53%)
Jeremy Grantham 23,910,369 sh (-2.24%)
Yacktman Focused Fund 19,400,000 sh (-3.00%)
Donald Yacktman 42,906,057 sh (-3.32%)
Yacktman Fund 16,300,000 sh (-4.12%)
Bill Frels 23,694 sh (-4.18%)
Ruane Cunniff 1,042,818 sh (-5.02%)
Joel Greenblatt 77,175 sh (-7.17%)
Mario Gabelli 2,324,323 sh (-11.06%)
Bill Gates 21,429,710 sh (-36.98%)
» More
Q4 2014

KO Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Arnold Van Den Berg 252,180 sh (New)
Pioneer Investments 2,054,895 sh (+14927.80%)
John Hussman 303,800 sh (+4963.33%)
Jim Simons 1,948,299 sh (+342.19%)
George Soros 122,446 sh (+22.45%)
Jeremy Grantham 28,699,646 sh (+20.03%)
Jeff Auxier 140,237 sh (+13.24%)
Bill Frels 24,632 sh (+3.96%)
Chris Davis 6,475 sh (+1.46%)
Ken Fisher 10,159,986 sh (+0.21%)
Wintergreen Fund 1,892,476 sh (unchged)
David Winters 2,508,827 sh (unchged)
Warren Buffett 400,000,000 sh (unchged)
Yacktman Fund 16,300,000 sh (unchged)
Tom Gayner Sold Out
Robert Olstein Sold Out
John Burbank Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Bill Gates Sold Out
Tom Russo 203,967 sh (-0.59%)
Donald Yacktman 41,278,303 sh (-3.79%)
Ruane Cunniff 988,876 sh (-5.17%)
Mario Gabelli 2,174,243 sh (-6.46%)
Yacktman Focused Fund 18,066,000 sh (-6.88%)
Dodge & Cox 35,814 sh (-20.91%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 3,683,719 sh (-31.66%)
Joel Greenblatt 29,956 sh (-61.18%)
» More
Q1 2015

KO Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Paul Tudor Jones 15,632 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,134,900 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 577,774 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 1,136,418 sh (+3693.62%)
Jim Simons 5,035,500 sh (+158.46%)
Pioneer Investments 2,208,675 sh (+7.48%)
Jeremy Grantham 30,051,400 sh (+4.71%)
Warren Buffett 400,000,000 sh (unchged)
Chris Davis Sold Out
George Soros Sold Out
Ken Fisher 10,138,290 sh (-0.21%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 3,622,230 sh (-1.67%)
Tom Russo 199,492 sh (-2.19%)
Bill Frels 24,074 sh (-2.27%)
Yacktman Fund 15,800,000 sh (-3.07%)
Dodge & Cox 34,242 sh (-4.39%)
Donald Yacktman 38,926,130 sh (-5.70%)
Yacktman Focused Fund 16,800,000 sh (-7.01%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 225,914 sh (-10.42%)
Ruane Cunniff 875,640 sh (-11.45%)
Mario Gabelli 1,808,632 sh (-16.82%)
John Hussman 203,800 sh (-32.92%)
Jeff Auxier 74,374 sh (-46.97%)
Wintergreen Fund 598,961 sh (-68.35%)
David Winters 788,223 sh (-68.58%)
» More
Q2 2015

KO Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Ken Fisher 10,205,546 sh (+0.66%)
Yacktman Fund 14,500,000 sh (-8.23%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 2,872,329 sh (-20.70%)
Yacktman Focused Fund 10,200,000 sh (-39.29%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 95,535 sh (-57.71%)
John Hussman 78,800 sh (-61.33%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with KO

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Coca-Cola Co

Murray Stahl’s Horizon Kinetics Comments on Coca-Cola - Mar 27, 2015

There is no longer a central mechanism for investors to vote with their feet on an individual stock. Taking Coca-Cola (KO), as an example, during the decade of the 1970s, the company generated about 13% annualized earnings growth, some years approaching 20%. For the first 5 years of the ‘70s, the P/E ratio ranged between about 30x and 40x earnings. Few would argue that it wasn’t overvalued. And, as the reversion to the mean principle would dictate, despite a decade of earnings growth that strong, the P/E contracted to 13.6x by 1978 and, over the course of an entire decade, the shares declined by over 45%.

Today, Coca-Cola trades at a P/E of 21x, not 30x or 40x. On the other hand, it is now a mature company: its products are everywhere, there is a limit to how much more Coca-Cola per-capita the world’s residents will drink, even if they don’t develop a preference to less sugary drinks. In fact, Coca-Cola has lost revenue in the last two years. With that understanding, at 21x earnings, is Coca-Cola any less overvalued than it was in 1973? It might be more overvalued. This is the type of unhealthy growth (slowing/declining) and valuation (high/rising) pairing that is more and more representative of the major stock indexes. That they have risen of late is no more a sign that one should be invested that way than that one should have been invested in the notorious Nifty Fifty during the early 1970s or in the favored stocks during the 1999 Internet Bubble.

From Murray Stahl (Trades, Portfolio)’s Horizon Kinetics 4Q 2014 Commentary.

Check out Murray Stahl latest stock trades

David Winters Comments on Coca-Cola Company - Mar 12, 2014

The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO) ("Coca-Cola") and Nestlé are examples of the world's most valuable and enduring companies. Unlike some speculative companies whose stock prices soared last year, these two were largely ignored. With total returns for 2013 of 17% and 13% respectively (including dividends), Coca-Cola and Nestlé fell into the overlooked category. Rather than get caught up in the speculative frenzy which consumed much of the market, we used the relative weakness in Coca-Cola and Nestlé as an opportunity to add to the Fund's positions.

In 2013, Coca-Cola was impacted by a new 'soda tax' in Mexico. While soda taxes make for attention grabbing headlines, we believe the underlying reality of Coca-Cola's business is as strong as ever. Coca-Cola's portfolio of drinks is extremely diverse in both brands and geography. In fact, of the 16 Coca-Cola brands that have over $1 billion in annual sales, only three (Coke, Sprite, and Fanta) are sugar-sweetened soft drinks. The majority of their $1 billion brands are comprised of sugar-free soft drinks, juices, teas, and waters. Beyond that, a sugar tax has been implemented in only one country, Mexico, and proposed implementation of such a tax in other countries has been met with firm resistance. While Mexico is a significant market for Coca-Cola, we believe the ultimate impact to the company's bottom line will be muted as consumers there switch to sugar-free versions of soft drinks and other healthier Coca-Cola offerings.

Coca-Cola's business is also affected by the volatility in emerging markets as it continues to grow its footprint globally and create shareholder value by streamlining its bottling operations in the United States and elsewhere around the world. The company has been a voracious buyer of its own stock and is in the midst of a share repurchase program totaling 500 million shares worth approximately $20 billion. We are happy to be buying shares alongside the company for a price which we believe will prove to be a bargain in the long-run.



From David Winters (Trades, Portfolio)' Wintergreen Fund (Trades, Portfolio) 2013 message to shareholders.

Check out David Winters latest stock trades

David Winters Comments on The Coca-Cola Company - Mar 05, 2014

The Coca-Cola Company ("Coca-Cola") and Nestle are examples of the world's most valuable and enduring companies. Unlike some speculative companies whose stock prices soared last year, these two were largely ignored. With total returns for 2013 of 17% and 13% respectively (including dividends), Coca-Cola and Nestle fell into the overlooked category. Rather than get caught up in the speculative frenzy which consumed much of the market, we used the relative weakness in Coca-Cola and Nestle as an opportunity to add to the Fund's positions.



In 2013, Coca-Cola was impacted by a new 'soda tax' in Mexico. While soda taxes make for attention grabbing headlines, we believe the underlying reality of Coca-Cola's business is as strong as ever. Coca-Cola's portfolio of drinks is extremely diverse in both brands and geography. In fact, of the 16 Coca-Cola brands that have over $1 billion in annual sales, only three (Coke, Sprite, and Fanta) are sugar-sweetened soft drinks. The majority of their $1 billion brands are comprised of sugar-free soft drinks, juices, teas, and waters. Beyond that, a sugar tax has been implemented in only one country, Mexico, and proposed implementation of such a tax in other countries has been met with firm resistance. While Mexico is a significant market for Coca-Cola, we believe the ultimate impact to the company's bottom line will be muted as consumers there switch to sugar-free versions of soft drinks and other healthier Coca-Cola offerings.



Coca-Cola's business is also affected by the volatility in emerging markets as it continues to grow its footprint globally and create shareholder value by streamlining its bottling operations in the United States and elsewhere around the world. The company has been a voracious buyer of its own stock and is in the midst of a share repurchase program totaling 500 million shares worth approximately $20 billion. We are happy to be buying shares alongside the company for a price which we believe will prove to be a bargain in the long-run.





Source: 2013 Wintergreen Fund Shareholder Letter



Check out David Winters latest stock trades

Yacktman Fund Comments on Coca-Cola - Jan 30, 2014

Coca-Cola (KO)'s shares appreciated solidly during the quarter after being left out of much of the rally earlier in the year. Microsoft Corp's shares were up solidly during the quarter on stronger than expected earnings and anticipation of positive changes at the company after a new Chief Executive Officer is hired.

From the Yacktman Fund (Trades, Portfolio)s' fourth quarter 2013 shareholder update.

Check out Donald Yacktman latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Coca-Cola Co

The Next Target 3G And Warren Buffet Could Team Up For
PepsiCo (NYSE:PEP) is best known as the competitor to Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO). The two giants effectively have the market for black gold (the other black gold) split between them. In addition Pepsi manufactures and sells salty and sweet snacks. Brands include: Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Gatorade, Tropicana, Lay's, Doritos, and Quaker. The food unit makes up 50% of revenue and the company derives approximately 50% from the U.S. Pepsi’s salty snacks have a large market share which is providing the company with a strong competitive advantage through scale. Back in the 60’s in the so-called conglomerate era, you may remember Teledyne, Pepsi merged with Frito-Lay. The combination has survived changing preferences among investors so far. Today, conglomerates are not popular. Buffett refers to the practice as empire building and diworsification, while academic theory also takes a dim view of the practice. Activists work 24/7 to break up stalwarts left and right and sometimes the initiative even comes from within. Read more...
Yacktman Focused Fund Sells More Than Buys in Second Quarter
The Yacktman Focused Fund (Trades, Portfolio) pursues growth companies at low prices when it looks for investment targets. It’s a strategy that has worked pretty well, producing returns of 10.67% in 2014, 27.01% in 2013 and 10.57% in 2012. But the Fund was focused on selling stock in the second quarter. Read more...
Yacktman Fund Reduces Stakes in Six of its Most Valuable Holdings
Donald Yacktman (Trades, Portfolio)’s Yacktman Fund (Trades, Portfolio) looks for growth companies at a low price when investing, an approach that produced an 11.33% return last year. In the second quarter of 2015, however, the Fund didn’t do any buying; instead, it reduced many of its holdings, including six of its 10 most valuable stakes. Read more...
David Winters Sells Two-Thirds of Stake in Coca-Cola
Wintergreen Fund (Trades, Portfolio) manager David Winters (Trades, Portfolio) is a deep value investor. Like many investors, Wintergreen struggled in 2014 – not as much as some, though, with a -1.68% return for the year – but it returned nearly 17% in 2013. Winters doesn’t make many transactions in a given quarter – his nine transactions in the first quarter of 2015 were the most he has made since the fourth quarter of 2013 – but they tend to be noteworthy. Read more...
Ray Dalio's Top 5 New Buys in Q1
Ray Dalio (Trades, Portfolio) founded the Connecticut-based hedge fund Bridgewater Associates in 1975. Today, it manages approximately $169 billion in assets for a variety of institutional clients, including governments and central banks, university endowments and charitable foundations. Read more...
Murray Stahl’s Horizon Kinetics Comments on Coca-Cola
There is no longer a central mechanism for investors to vote with their feet on an individual stock. Taking Coca-Cola (KO), as an example, during the decade of the 1970s, the company generated about 13% annualized earnings growth, some years approaching 20%. For the first 5 years of the ‘70s, the P/E ratio ranged between about 30x and 40x earnings. Few would argue that it wasn’t overvalued. And, as the reversion to the mean principle would dictate, despite a decade of earnings growth that strong, the P/E contracted to 13.6x by 1978 and, over the course of an entire decade, the shares declined by over 45%. Read more...
PepsiCo: A Reliable Stalwart Stock According to Peter Lynch Checklist
Former Fidelity Magellan fund manager Peter Lynch classified stalwart companies as those with large market capitalizations that provide reliable and predictable growth. These stable companies won’t be ten-baggers for a portfolio, but they can help mitigate risk in times of uncertainty. Read more...
How Did Coca-Cola Score on the Stalwarts Checklist?
Last week, I used the Phil Fisher checklist to determine whether or not Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) was a good company to invest in. The company scored a 3.6 out of 5. The checklist feature is a way to help you dig deeper than a company’s P/E, PEG, P/B ratios and dividend yield (or as I like to call them, the “Fantastic Four”) to help decide whether or not a certain stock is a good investment. And yes, I am aware that there are other factors that come into the equation when investing. Read more...
Can Coke Refresh Your Stock Portfolio?
Ray Dalio's Top 5 New Second Quarter Stocks
Ray Dalio (Trades, Portfolio) is founder of Bridgewater Associates, the largest hedge fund in the world with $150 billion in assets. His All Weather Fund returned 11.2% this year through July, according to Forbes, compared to the S&P’s 6% gain. This is a turn for the better, as the fund declined 4% in 2013 while the S&P rose by about 30%. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 40.90
KO's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
59% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 23.40 vs. KO: 40.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
KO' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 11.92  Med: 20.39 Max: 41.09
Current: 40.9
11.92
41.09
Forward P/E 19.12
KO's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
55% of the 31 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 18.66 vs. KO: 19.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 41.10
KO's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
61% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 22.80 vs. KO: 41.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
KO' s 10-Year PE(NRI) Range
Min: 11.94  Med: 20.44 Max: 41.25
Current: 41.1
11.94
41.25
P/B 6.31
KO's P/B is ranked lower than
76% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 2.92 vs. KO: 6.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
KO' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 4.04  Med: 5.47 Max: 7.36
Current: 6.31
4.04
7.36
P/S 3.97
KO's P/S is ranked lower than
85% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.36 vs. KO: 3.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
KO' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 2.87  Med: 4.06 Max: 5.32
Current: 3.97
2.87
5.32
PFCF 20.64
KO's PFCF is ranked lower than
52% of the 42 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 20.50 vs. KO: 20.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
KO' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 16.91  Med: 22.07 Max: 27.96
Current: 20.64
16.91
27.96
POCF 16.11
KO's POCF is ranked lower than
59% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 14.88 vs. KO: 16.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
KO' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 12.37  Med: 16.73 Max: 21.74
Current: 16.11
12.37
21.74
EV-to-EBIT 18.58
KO's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
55% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 17.59 vs. KO: 18.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
KO' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 11.4  Med: 18.00 Max: 22.7
Current: 18.58
11.4
22.7
PEG 31.62
KO's PEG is ranked lower than
94% of the 36 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.05 vs. KO: 31.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
KO' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.68  Med: 2.23 Max: 54.76
Current: 31.62
0.68
54.76
Shiller P/E 20.62
KO's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
70% of the 47 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 26.13 vs. KO: 20.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
KO' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 16.71  Med: 21.90 Max: 31.16
Current: 20.62
16.71
31.16
Current Ratio 1.14
KO's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 90 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.52 vs. KO: 1.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
KO' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.63  Med: 1.00 Max: 1.34
Current: 1.14
0.63
1.34
Quick Ratio 1.03
KO's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 90 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. KO: 1.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
KO' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.54  Med: 0.86 Max: 1.21
Current: 1.03
0.54
1.21
Days Inventory 66.94
KO's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
64% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 52.67 vs. KO: 66.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
KO' s 10-Year Days Inventory Range
Min: 57.53  Med: 64.04 Max: 74.74
Current: 66.94
57.53
74.74
Days Sales Outstanding 39.73
KO's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
67% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 46.26 vs. KO: 39.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
KO' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 31.71  Med: 36.23 Max: 46.04
Current: 39.73
31.71
46.04

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 3.09
KO's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
81% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 2.24 vs. KO: 3.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
KO' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 2.12  Med: 2.71 Max: 3.96
Current: 3.09
2.12
3.96
Dividend Payout 0.74
KO's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
99% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. KO: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
KO' s 10-Year Dividend Payout Range
Min: 0.18  Med: 0.50 Max: 1.77
Current: 0.74
0.18
1.77
Dividend growth (3y) 9.10
KO's Dividend growth (3y) is ranked higher than
66% of the 29 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 7.10 vs. KO: 9.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend growth (3y) only.
KO' s 10-Year Dividend growth (3y) Range
Min: 6.3  Med: 9.00 Max: 12.1
Current: 9.1
6.3
12.1
Yield on cost (5-Year) 4.60
KO's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
81% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 2.51 vs. KO: 4.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
KO' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 3.16  Med: 4.05 Max: 5.9
Current: 4.6
3.16
5.9
Share Buyback Rate 1.40
KO's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
80% of the 50 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: -0.30 vs. KO: 1.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
KO' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 1.5  Med: 0.50 Max: 0
Current: 1.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 76.07
KO's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
99% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.65 vs. KO: 76.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
KO' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 7.61  Med: 17.34 Max: 63.36
Current: 76.07
7.61
63.36
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 2.06
KO's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
70% of the 10 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.73 vs. KO: 2.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 5.40
KO's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
58% of the 90 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. KO: 5.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
KO' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 4.4  Med: 5.50 Max: 8.8
Current: 5.4
4.4
8.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 0.71
KO's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
65% of the 48 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 7.83 vs. KO: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
KO' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: 0.7  Med: 12.80 Max: 21.7
Current: 0.71
0.7
21.7

Business Description

Industry: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic » Beverages - Soft Drinks
Compare:PEP, KOF, SODA, CCLAY, DPS » details
Traded in other countries:KO.Mexico, KO.Chile, KO.Switzerland, CCC3.Germany, COCA34.Brazil, KO.Argentina, 0QZK.UK, KO.Romania,
Coca-Cola Co was incorporated in September 1919 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Company is a beverage company. It owns or licences and market more than 500 non alcoholic beverage brands, mainly sparkling beverages, but also a variety of still beverages such as waters, enhanced waters, juices and juice drinks, ready-to-drink teas and coffees, and energy and sports drinks. It owns and markets four of the world's top five nonalcoholic sparkling beverage brands: Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Fanta and Sprite. Finished beverage products bearing its trademarks, sold in the United States since 1886, are now sold in more than 200 countries. It makes its branded beverage products available to consumers throughout the world through its network of Company-owned or controlled bottling and distribution operations as well as independently owned bottling partners, distributors, wholesalers and retailers. The Company's main competitors include, Nestlé, DPSG, Groupe Danone, Mondelēz International, Inc., Kraft Foods Group, Inc., and the Unilever Group. In certain markets, its competition includes beer companies. It also competes against numerous regional and local companies and, in some markets, against retailers that have developed their own store or private label beverage brands. The Company's operating groups are Eurasia and Africa, Europe, Latin America, North America, Pacific, Bottling Investments, and Corporate. The Company is required to comply, and it is its policy to comply, with applicable laws in the numerous countries throughout the world in which it does business. The safety, production, transportation, distribution, advertising, labeling and sale of many of Company's products and their ingredients are subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; the Federal Trade Commission Act; the Lanham Act; state consumer protection laws; competition laws; federal, state and local workplace health and safety laws; various federal, state and local environmental protection laws; and various other federal, state and local statutes and regulations.
» More Articles for KO

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Iolite Partners – Q2 2015 Investor Letter Jul 29 2015 
Retired Investors Don’t Buy Bonds Until? Jul 29 2015 
mikel Jul 25 2015 
mikel Jul 25 2015 
The Next Target 3G And Warren Buffet Could Team Up For Jul 19 2015 
Spotting Creation of Value Jul 17 2015 
Yacktman Focused Fund Sells More Than Buys in Second Quarter Jul 16 2015 
Yacktman Fund Reduces Stakes in Six of its Most Valuable Holdings Jul 15 2015 
Dividends Jul 14 2015 
dividends Jul 14 2015 

More From Other Websites
Advertisers Move Quickly To Cash In On China's 2022 Winter Olympics Win Aug 01 2015
10-Q for The Coca-Cola Co. Jul 31 2015
How Is Coca-Cola Bottling Placed This Earnings Season? - Analyst Blog Jul 31 2015
Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc (CCE)’s Shares Rally Amid Better-Than-Expected Earnings, Merger Rumors Jul 31 2015
A Red Bull, Rockstar, Monster Future Jul 31 2015
Expedia jumps as earnings soar; Twitter posts worst weekly loss since May Jul 31 2015
Coca-Cola Bottlers of the World, Unite and Take Over Jul 31 2015
3 Stocks, 3 trades: STX, CCE, & EXPE Jul 31 2015
Dr Pepper Snapple’s 2Q15 Volumes Driven by Noncarbonated Beverages Jul 31 2015
Coca-Cola’s 2Q15 Results: Gauging Market Reaction Jul 31 2015
Coca-Cola bottlers in Europe in talks over merger Jul 31 2015
Why Ford is shredding cash...literally Jul 31 2015
Revisiting Harry Potter Stocks on His 35th Birthday - Analyst Blog Jul 31 2015
Wall Street's roller coaster; Oil companies struggle; Game of Thrones bonus Jul 31 2015
Coca-Cola Enterprises in Advanced Talks About Combining With Other Coke Bottlers Jul 30 2015
Coca-Cola Enterprises Shares Jump on Report of Three-Way Merger Jul 30 2015
Venezuela currency blues hit U.S. blue-chip companies Jul 30 2015
Is Coca-Cola on the Road to Recovery? Jul 30 2015
COCA COLA CO Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Jul 29 2015
Dr Pepper Snapple’s 2Q15 Earnings Exceed Wall Street Expectations Jul 29 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK