Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt No Debt
NAS:LANC's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
100% of the 1576 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. NAS:LANC: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NAS:LANC' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: N/A Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity-to-Asset 0.81
NAS:LANC's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
88% of the 1540 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. NAS:LANC: 0.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NAS:LANC' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.78 Max: 0.84
Current: 0.81
0.41
0.84
Interest Coverage No Debt
NAS:LANC's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
99% of the 1370 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 19.63 vs. NAS:LANC: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NAS:LANC' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.49  Med: 1067.82 Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Piotroski F-Score: 8
Altman Z-Score: 21.53
Beneish M-Score: -2.40
WACC vs ROIC
7.73%
32.52%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 16.86
NAS:LANC's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
85% of the 1561 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.68 vs. NAS:LANC: 16.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NAS:LANC' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.68  Med: 14.15 Max: 16.86
Current: 16.86
7.68
16.86
Net Margin % 11.09
NAS:LANC's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
81% of the 1565 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.98 vs. NAS:LANC: 11.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NAS:LANC' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.84  Med: 9.45 Max: 11.09
Current: 11.09
3.84
11.09
ROE % 25.51
NAS:LANC's ROE % is ranked higher than
88% of the 1523 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 8.16 vs. NAS:LANC: 25.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NAS:LANC' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.36  Med: 19.42 Max: 25.91
Current: 25.51
9.36
25.91
ROA % 20.49
NAS:LANC's ROA % is ranked higher than
94% of the 1600 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.84 vs. NAS:LANC: 20.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NAS:LANC' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.73  Med: 15.97 Max: 21.19
Current: 20.49
6.73
21.19
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 80.46
NAS:LANC's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
93% of the 1587 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.34 vs. NAS:LANC: 80.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NAS:LANC' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23  Med: 49.35 Max: 80.46
Current: 80.46
23
80.46
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 5.40
NAS:LANC's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
64% of the 1341 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.50 vs. NAS:LANC: 5.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NAS:LANC' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.8  Med: 5.4 Max: 24.6
Current: 5.4
-4.8
24.6
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 6.10
NAS:LANC's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
51% of the 1162 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. NAS:LANC: 6.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NAS:LANC' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -6.8  Med: 6.1 Max: 26.1
Current: 6.1
-6.8
26.1
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 5.40
NAS:LANC's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
50% of the 1041 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.40 vs. NAS:LANC: 5.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NAS:LANC' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.8  Med: 5.4 Max: 43.8
Current: 5.4
-13.8
43.8
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with Lancaster Colony Corp $NAS:LANC.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NAS:LANC's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-04-27)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

LANC Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Ken Fisher 403,956 sh (+18.38%)
Chuck Royce 126,100 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons 609,500 sh (-16.35%)
Donald Yacktman 305,400 sh (-22.59%)
Yacktman Fund 270,000 sh (-22.86%)
Murray Stahl 3,468 sh (-26.88%)
Paul Tudor Jones 2,300 sh (-54.00%)
Joel Greenblatt 16,193 sh (-63.99%)
» More
Q3 2016

LANC Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Ken Fisher 408,081 sh (+1.02%)
Chuck Royce 126,100 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jim Simons 574,500 sh (-5.74%)
Murray Stahl 3,105 sh (-10.47%)
Yacktman Fund 230,000 sh (-14.81%)
Donald Yacktman 260,000 sh (-14.87%)
Joel Greenblatt 1,721 sh (-89.37%)
» More
Q4 2016

LANC Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 587,000 sh (+2.18%)
Donald Yacktman Sold Out
Yacktman Fund Sold Out
Ken Fisher 399,711 sh (-2.05%)
Joel Greenblatt 1,671 sh (-2.91%)
Murray Stahl 3,003 sh (-3.29%)
Chuck Royce 121,500 sh (-3.65%)
» More
Q1 2017

LANC Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Ken Fisher 403,475 sh (+0.94%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with LANC

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Consumer Packaged Goods » Packaged Foods    NAICS: 311412    SIC: 2030
Compare:OTCPK:TSUKY, OTCPK:MLFNF, NAS:LNCE, NYSE:FLO, OTCPK:ARZTY, NYSE:BGS, NAS:JJSF, NAS:BUFF, OTCPK:TATYY, NYSE:APFH, NAS:SAFM, OTCPK:GNCGY, NYSE:THS, OTCPK:KWPCF, OTCPK:SMGBF, NAS:TWNK, OTCPK:FNEVF, NYSE:NOMD, OTCPK:PIFMF, OTCPK:AVSFF » details
Traded in other countries:LC1.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Lancaster Colony Corp is a manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for the retail and food service markets. The Company offers dressings, sauces, croutons, fruit glazes, vegetable dips, fruit dips, frozen breads and yeast rolls.

Lancaster Colony Corp began its operations in 1961 as a Delaware corporation. In 1992, it re-incorporated as an Ohio corporation. It is a manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for the retail and foodservice markets. The Company offers dressings, sauces, croutons, fruit glazes, vegetable dips, fruit dips, frozen breads and yeast rolls. The Company operates in one business segment Specialty Foods. The food products it manufacture and sell include: salad dressings and sauces marketed under the brand names Marzetti, Cardini's, Simply Dressed, Katherine's Kitchen and Girard's; fruit glazes, vegetable dips and fruit dips marketed under the brand name Marzetti; Greek yogurt vegetable dips and hummus marketed under the brand name Otria; frozen garlic breads marketed under the brand names New York BRAND, Mamma Bella and Mamma Bella's; frozen Parkerhouse style yeast dinner rolls and sweet rolls, as well as biscuits, marketed under the brand names Sister Schubert's, Marshall's and Mary B's; premium dry egg noodles marketed under the brand names Inn Maid and Amish Kitchen; frozen specialty noodles marketed under the brand names Reames and Aunt Vi's; croutons and related products marketed under the brand names New York BRAND, Texas Toast, Chatham Village, Cardini's, Simply Dressed and Marzetti; snack sticks marketed under the brand name New York BRAND; flatbread wraps and pizza crusts marketed under the brand name Flatout and caviar marketed under the brand name Romanoff. A portion of its sales are products sold under private label to retailers, distributors and restaurants in the United States. Additionally, a small portion of its sales are dressing packets, frozen specialty noodles, pasta and flatbreads sold to industrial customers for use as ingredients or components in their products.It rely on raw materials and packaging for the day-to-day production of its products, including soybean oil, various sweeteners, eggs, dairy-related products, flour, various films and plastic and paper packaging materials. It competes with both domestic and foreign manufacturers of various sizes in the United States and internationally.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 26.85
LANC's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 1258 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 20.28 vs. LANC: 26.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
LANC' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.33  Med: 21.05 Max: 38.97
Current: 26.85
11.33
38.97
Forward PE Ratio 25.38
LANC's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
85% of the 359 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 19.01 vs. LANC: 25.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 26.85
LANC's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
65% of the 1252 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 20.28 vs. LANC: 26.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
LANC' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.33  Med: 20.2 Max: 30.21
Current: 26.85
11.33
30.21
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 28.34
LANC's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
65% of the 693 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 20.79 vs. LANC: 28.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
LANC' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.22  Med: 19.96 Max: 75.51
Current: 28.34
10.22
75.51
PB Ratio 6.35
LANC's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
90% of the 1512 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.75 vs. LANC: 6.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
LANC' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.25  Med: 3.38 Max: 7.21
Current: 6.35
2.25
7.21
PS Ratio 2.98
LANC's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
80% of the 1516 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. LANC: 2.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
LANC' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.89  Med: 1.6 Max: 3.26
Current: 2.98
0.89
3.26
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 28.91
LANC's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
68% of the 600 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 18.92 vs. LANC: 28.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
LANC' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.11  Med: 19.18 Max: 39.59
Current: 28.91
9.11
39.59
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 24.64
LANC's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
78% of the 841 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 12.31 vs. LANC: 24.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
LANC' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.55  Med: 14.54 Max: 26.92
Current: 24.64
8.55
26.92
EV-to-EBIT 17.13
LANC's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
52% of the 1680 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 16.43 vs. LANC: 17.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
LANC' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.8  Med: 12.6 Max: 19.3
Current: 17.13
6.8
19.3
EV-to-EBITDA 15.31
LANC's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
61% of the 1719 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 12.42 vs. LANC: 15.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
LANC' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.1  Med: 10.5 Max: 17
Current: 15.31
6.1
17
PEG Ratio 6.21
LANC's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
82% of the 577 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.04 vs. LANC: 6.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
LANC' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.07  Med: 2.09 Max: 128.85
Current: 6.21
1.07
128.85
Shiller PE Ratio 35.60
LANC's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 264 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 28.51 vs. LANC: 35.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
LANC' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.59  Med: 21.38 Max: 39.8
Current: 35.6
10.59
39.8
Current Ratio 3.97
LANC's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 1427 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.60 vs. LANC: 3.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
LANC' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.61  Med: 3.47 Max: 5.53
Current: 3.97
1.61
5.53
Quick Ratio 2.82
LANC's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
85% of the 1427 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. LANC: 2.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
LANC' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.69  Med: 1.75 Max: 4.58
Current: 2.82
0.69
4.58
Days Inventory 33.84
LANC's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
77% of the 1460 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 63.56 vs. LANC: 33.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
LANC' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 31.53  Med: 49.45 Max: 62.5
Current: 33.84
31.53
62.5
Days Sales Outstanding 21.90
LANC's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
73% of the 1148 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 38.13 vs. LANC: 21.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
LANC' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 20.23  Med: 21.29 Max: 30.99
Current: 21.9
20.23
30.99
Days Payable 16.58
LANC's Days Payable is ranked lower than
83% of the 1023 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 45.59 vs. LANC: 16.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
LANC' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.35  Med: 18.16 Max: 20.37
Current: 16.58
16.35
20.37

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.62
LANC's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
55% of the 1628 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.81 vs. LANC: 1.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
LANC' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.42  Med: 2.18 Max: 3.97
Current: 1.62
1.42
3.97
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.43
LANC's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 986 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.36 vs. LANC: 0.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
LANC' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 0.43 Max: 0.68
Current: 0.43
0.29
0.68
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 8.80
LANC's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
63% of the 677 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. LANC: 8.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
LANC' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.3  Med: 8.8 Max: 20.9
Current: 8.8
3.3
20.9
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.69
LANC's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
56% of the 1557 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.93 vs. LANC: 1.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 2.56
LANC's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
55% of the 2022 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.27 vs. LANC: 2.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
LANC' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.25  Med: 3.45 Max: 6.28
Current: 2.56
2.25
6.28
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.10
LANC's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
70% of the 698 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: -1.90 vs. LANC: -0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
LANC' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.1  Med: 2 Max: 15.3
Current: -0.1
-13.1
15.3

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 24.46
LANC's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
85% of the 659 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 6.36 vs. LANC: 24.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
LANC' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.71  Med: 7.58 Max: 53.8
Current: 24.46
3.71
53.8
Price-to-Tangible-Book 10.76
LANC's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
93% of the 1418 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.91 vs. LANC: 10.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
LANC' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.9  Med: 3.7 Max: 11.76
Current: 10.76
0.9
11.76
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 2.20
LANC's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
65% of the 659 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.57 vs. LANC: 2.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
LANC' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 1.3 Max: 2.4
Current: 2.2
0.66
2.4
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 2.13
LANC's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
77% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. LANC: 2.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.86
LANC's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
82% of the 1320 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. LANC: 1.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
LANC' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.15  Med: 0.84 Max: 2.03
Current: 1.86
0.15
2.03
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 5.10
LANC's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
94% of the 290 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.64 vs. LANC: 5.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
LANC' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.61  Med: 1.24 Max: 5.58
Current: 5.1
0.61
5.58
Price-to-Graham-Number 3.58
LANC's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
87% of the 997 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.42 vs. LANC: 3.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
LANC' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.68  Med: 1.66 Max: 3.92
Current: 3.58
0.68
3.92
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.83
LANC's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
55% of the 1947 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.41 vs. LANC: 5.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
LANC' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.2  Med: 8 Max: 14.6
Current: 5.83
5.2
14.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 8.61
LANC's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
57% of the 771 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.68 vs. LANC: 8.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
LANC' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 6.4 Max: 18.9
Current: 8.61
0.5
18.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,190
EPS (TTM) $ 4.82
Beta0.92
Short Percentage of Float1.26%
52-Week Range $108.29 - 149.30
Shares Outstanding (Mil)27.43

Analyst Estimate

Jun17 Jun18
Revenue (Mil $) 1,205 1,257
EPS ($) 4.69 5.12
EPS without NRI ($) 4.69 5.12
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
10.00%
Dividends per Share ($) 2.15 2.35
» More Articles for NAS:LANC

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Lancaster Colony To Webcast Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2017 conference Call Apr 18 2017 
Yacktman Asset Management Comments on Lancaster Colony Feb 08 2017 
Lancaster Colony Increases Quarterly Dividend Nov 28 2016 
Dividend King in Focus: Lancaster Colony Sep 19 2016 
My Favorite Stocks With Recent Dividend Growth May 26 2013 
Flowers Foods Inc. (FLO) Dividend Stock Analysis Nov 02 2012 
6 Stocks With A Vision Of Higher Dividends Jan 02 2012 
Five Show me the money dividend stocks Nov 28 2011 
Lancaster Colony Corp. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Feb 09 2011 
Lancaster Colony Corp. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) May 10 2010 

More From Other Websites
Lancaster Colony To Webcast Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2017 conference Call Apr 18 2017
Here's Why Investors Are Eyeing Pinnacle Foods (PF) Apr 03 2017
Lancaster Colony Corp. : LANC-US: Dividend Analysis : March 09th, 2017 (record date) : By the... Apr 03 2017
United Natural (UNFI) Downgraded to Sell on Dismal Trends Mar 29 2017
Kraft Heinz Introduces Oven Baked Macaroni & Cheese Item Mar 29 2017
Lancaster Colony Continues Higher Cash Dividend Feb 22 2017
Yacktman Asset Management Comments on Lancaster Colony Feb 08 2017
Lancaster Colony Corp. : LANC-US: Dividend Analysis : December 09th, 2016 (record date) : By the... Jan 30 2017
Lancaster Colony Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : LANC-US : January... Jan 27 2017
Edited Transcript of LANC earnings conference call or presentation 26-Jan-17 3:00pm GMT Jan 26 2017
Lancaster Colony posts 2Q profit Jan 26 2017
Lancaster Colony Reports Second Quarter Sales And Earnings Jan 26 2017
4 Dividend Stocks That'll Likely Raise Their Payouts for a 55th Consecutive Year Jan 25 2017
Lancaster Colony To Webcast Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2017 Conference Call Jan 17 2017
B&G Foods Fundamentals Solid: Should You Add the Stock? Jan 09 2017
J&J Snack Foods Acquires Bakery Hill & Valley in Illinois Jan 05 2017
Procter & Gamble Launches New Braun Series 9 Shaver Jan 05 2017
PepsiCo: Foreign Exchange, Low CSD Volumes Raise Caution Dec 30 2016
Procter & Gamble (PG) Sales Remain Low: Should You Dump? Dec 29 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)