Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt No Debt
LANC's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
100% of the 1509 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. LANC: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
LANC' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 10000.00 Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity to Asset 0.80
LANC's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
88% of the 1474 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. LANC: 0.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
LANC' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 0.80 Max: 0.84
Current: 0.8
0.66
0.84
Interest Coverage No Debt
LANC's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
99% of the 1019 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 16.98 vs. LANC: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
LANC' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.49  Med: 10000.00 Max: 9999.99
Current: No Debt
24.49
9999.99
F-Score: 6
Z-Score: 15.73
M-Score: -2.22
WACC vs ROIC
10.15%
28.44%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 14.14
LANC's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
82% of the 1502 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 4.84 vs. LANC: 14.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
LANC' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.68  Med: 13.76 Max: 16.49
Current: 14.14
7.68
16.49
Net-margin (%) 9.32
LANC's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
78% of the 1506 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.07 vs. LANC: 9.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
LANC' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.84  Med: 8.84 Max: 10.88
Current: 9.32
3.84
10.88
ROE (%) 19.36
LANC's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
84% of the 1479 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 6.35 vs. LANC: 19.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
LANC' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.36  Med: 18.02 Max: 25.91
Current: 19.36
9.36
25.91
ROA (%) 15.73
LANC's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
92% of the 1536 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.16 vs. LANC: 15.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
LANC' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.73  Med: 14.86 Max: 21.19
Current: 15.73
6.73
21.19
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 64.69
LANC's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
92% of the 1524 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 11.46 vs. LANC: 64.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
LANC' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23  Med: 47.52 Max: 60.28
Current: 64.69
23
60.28
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 3.70
LANC's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
53% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.20 vs. LANC: 3.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
LANC' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.1  Med: 3.30 Max: 9.8
Current: 3.7
-1.1
9.8
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 2.80
LANC's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
50% of the 1100 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.00 vs. LANC: 2.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
LANC' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -6.9  Med: 2.10 Max: 19.7
Current: 2.8
-6.9
19.7
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 3.20
LANC's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
50% of the 999 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.20 vs. LANC: 3.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
LANC' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.8  Med: 2.70 Max: 32.8
Current: 3.2
-13.8
32.8
» LANC's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2015

LANC Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Jim Simons 666,562 sh (+4.48%)
Murray Stahl 9,495 sh (+1.90%)
Donald Yacktman 530,000 sh (unchged)
Yacktman Fund 460,000 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham 17,937 sh (-3.24%)
Joel Greenblatt 39,532 sh (-32.69%)
Chuck Royce 309,700 sh (-44.05%)
» More
Q2 2015

LANC Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Murray Stahl 10,037 sh (+5.71%)
Jim Simons 703,162 sh (+5.49%)
Yacktman Fund 460,000 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Donald Yacktman 525,000 sh (-0.94%)
Chuck Royce 275,700 sh (-10.98%)
Jeremy Grantham 14,037 sh (-21.74%)
» More
Q3 2015

LANC Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jim Simons 730,962 sh (+3.95%)
Yacktman Fund 460,000 sh (unchged)
Donald Yacktman 518,000 sh (-1.33%)
Chuck Royce 226,900 sh (-17.70%)
Murray Stahl 7,085 sh (-29.41%)
Jeremy Grantham 6,637 sh (-52.72%)
» More
Q4 2015

LANC Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons 732,600 sh (+0.22%)
Yacktman Fund 370,000 sh (-19.57%)
Donald Yacktman 412,500 sh (-20.37%)
Chuck Royce 126,100 sh (-44.42%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with LANC

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 25.89
LANC's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
55% of the 1696 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 20.60 vs. LANC: 25.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
LANC' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.33  Med: 19.66 Max: 38.97
Current: 25.89
11.33
38.97
Forward P/E 23.26
LANC's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
81% of the 765 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 16.23 vs. LANC: 23.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 25.77
LANC's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
60% of the 1277 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 20.90 vs. LANC: 25.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
LANC' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.31  Med: 18.89 Max: 30.35
Current: 25.77
11.31
30.35
P/B 5.75
LANC's P/B is ranked lower than
89% of the 1979 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.61 vs. LANC: 5.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
LANC' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.22  Med: 3.19 Max: 5.75
Current: 5.75
2.22
5.75
P/S 2.38
LANC's P/S is ranked lower than
86% of the 1977 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.83 vs. LANC: 2.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
LANC' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.89  Med: 1.45 Max: 2.85
Current: 2.38
0.89
2.85
PFCF 23.65
LANC's PFCF is ranked higher than
54% of the 1086 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 23.22 vs. LANC: 23.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
LANC' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.13  Med: 18.63 Max: 43.05
Current: 23.65
9.13
43.05
POCF 21.16
LANC's POCF is ranked lower than
66% of the 1493 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.44 vs. LANC: 21.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
LANC' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.56  Med: 14.14 Max: 24.88
Current: 21.16
8.56
24.88
EV-to-EBIT 16.63
LANC's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
50% of the 1806 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 16.19 vs. LANC: 16.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
LANC' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.8  Med: 12.00 Max: 18.8
Current: 16.63
6.8
18.8
EV-to-EBITDA 14.61
LANC's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
58% of the 1886 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 12.51 vs. LANC: 14.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
LANC' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.1  Med: 9.90 Max: 16.5
Current: 14.61
6.1
16.5
Shiller P/E 30.62
LANC's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
59% of the 344 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 25.68 vs. LANC: 30.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
LANC' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.51  Med: 20.15 Max: 36.18
Current: 30.62
10.51
36.18
Current Ratio 3.96
LANC's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 1474 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.58 vs. LANC: 3.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
LANC' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.66  Med: 3.89 Max: 5.53
Current: 3.96
1.66
5.53
Quick Ratio 3.02
LANC's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 1473 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. LANC: 3.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
LANC' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.83  Med: 2.11 Max: 4.58
Current: 3.02
0.83
4.58
Days Inventory 32.08
LANC's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
80% of the 1426 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 66.21 vs. LANC: 32.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
LANC' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 32.77  Med: 51.13 Max: 67.71
Current: 32.08
32.77
67.71
Days Sales Outstanding 19.12
LANC's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
78% of the 1086 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 39.52 vs. LANC: 19.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
LANC' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 20.27  Med: 21.73 Max: 35.76
Current: 19.12
20.27
35.76
Days Payable 17.91
LANC's Days Payable is ranked lower than
84% of the 1062 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 43.24 vs. LANC: 17.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
LANC' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.73  Med: 18.87 Max: 20.37
Current: 17.91
16.73
20.37

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 1.86
LANC's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
52% of the 1773 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.05 vs. LANC: 1.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
LANC' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.55  Med: 2.27 Max: 3.97
Current: 1.86
1.55
3.97
Dividend Payout 0.48
LANC's Dividend Payout is ranked lower than
57% of the 1019 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. LANC: 0.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
LANC' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.33 Max: 9
Current: 0.48
0.14
9
Dividend Growth (3y) 8.90
LANC's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
67% of the 646 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.50 vs. LANC: 8.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
LANC' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.3  Med: 7.50 Max: 18.7
Current: 8.9
3.3
18.7
Forward Dividend Yield 1.98
LANC's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
51% of the 1541 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.12 vs. LANC: 1.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 3.21
LANC's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
63% of the 1780 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.02 vs. LANC: 3.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
LANC' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.66  Med: 3.89 Max: 6.81
Current: 3.21
2.66
6.81
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.10
LANC's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
70% of the 763 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: -1.20 vs. LANC: -0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
LANC' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.1  Med: 2.60 Max: 5.8
Current: -0.1
-0.1
5.8

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 23.97
LANC's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
72% of the 864 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.94 vs. LANC: 23.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
LANC' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.71  Med: 7.11 Max: 15.37
Current: 23.97
3.71
15.37
Price/Tangible Book 9.44
LANC's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
86% of the 1763 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. LANC: 9.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
LANC' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.94  Med: 3.65 Max: 6.66
Current: 9.44
1.94
6.66
Price/Projected FCF 1.81
LANC's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
62% of the 1085 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.40 vs. LANC: 1.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
LANC' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 1.10 Max: 1.78
Current: 1.81
0.64
1.78
Price/Median PS Value 1.67
LANC's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
83% of the 1916 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. LANC: 1.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
LANC' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 0.93 Max: 1.82
Current: 1.67
0.49
1.82
Price/Graham Number 3.27
LANC's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
79% of the 1533 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. LANC: 3.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
LANC' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.82  Med: 1.66 Max: 2.82
Current: 3.27
0.82
2.82
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 5.97
LANC's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 1482 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 4.90 vs. LANC: 5.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
LANC' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.3  Med: 8.30 Max: 14.6
Current: 5.97
5.3
14.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 5.19
LANC's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
55% of the 698 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.69 vs. LANC: 5.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
LANC' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.7  Med: 4.70 Max: 18.7
Current: 5.19
0.7
18.7

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $1160
EPS $ 3.95
Beta1.12
Short Percentage of Float3.97%
52-Week Range $86.85 - 119.80
Shares Outstanding(Mil)27.37

Analyst Estimate

Jun16 Jun17
Revenue(Mil) 1,189 1,234
EPS($) 4.13 4.34
EPS without NRI($) 4.13 4.34

Latest Earnings Webcast

» More Conference Calls

Business Description

Industry: Consumer Packaged Goods » Packaged Foods
Compare:NSRGY, UL, UN, DANOY, GIS » details
Traded in other countries:LC1.Germany,
Lancaster Colony Corp began its operations in 1961 as a Delaware corporation. In 1992, it re-incorporated as an Ohio corporation. It is a manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for the retail and foodservice markets. The Company offers dressings, sauces, croutons, fruit glazes, vegetable dips, fruit dips, frozen breads and yeast rolls. The Company operates in one business segment Specialty Foods. The food products it manufacture and sell include: salad dressings and sauces marketed under the brand names Marzetti, Cardini's, Simply Dressed, Katherine's Kitchen and Girard's; fruit glazes, vegetable dips and fruit dips marketed under the brand name Marzetti; Greek yogurt vegetable dips and hummus marketed under the brand name Otria; frozen garlic breads marketed under the brand names New York BRAND, Mamma Bella and Mamma Bella's; frozen Parkerhouse style yeast dinner rolls and sweet rolls, as well as biscuits, marketed under the brand names Sister Schubert's, Marshall's and Mary B's; premium dry egg noodles marketed under the brand names Inn Maid and Amish Kitchen; frozen specialty noodles marketed under the brand names Reames and Aunt Vi's; croutons and related products marketed under the brand names New York BRAND, Texas Toast, Chatham Village, Cardini's, Simply Dressed and Marzetti; snack sticks marketed under the brand name New York BRAND; flatbread wraps and pizza crusts marketed under the brand name Flatout and caviar marketed under the brand name Romanoff. A portion of its sales are products sold under private label to retailers, distributors and restaurants in the United States. Additionally, a small portion of its sales are dressing packets, frozen specialty noodles, pasta and flatbreads sold to industrial customers for use as ingredients or components in their products.It rely on raw materials and packaging for the day-to-day production of its products, including soybean oil, various sweeteners, eggs, dairy-related products, flour, various films and plastic and paper packaging materials. It competes with both domestic and foreign manufacturers of various sizes in the United States and internationally.
» More Articles for LANC

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
My Favorite Stocks With Recent Dividend Growth May 26 2013 
Flowers Foods Inc. (FLO) Dividend Stock Analysis Nov 02 2012 
6 Stocks With A Vision Of Higher Dividends Jan 02 2012 
Five Show me the money dividend stocks Nov 28 2011 
Lancaster Colony Corp. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Feb 09 2011 
Lancaster Colony Corp. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) May 10 2010 
Lancaster Colony Corp. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Feb 05 2010 
Long Term Guru Dividend Stocks: Sysco Corp., Intel Corporation, Lancaster Colony Corporation, Brown- Nov 28 2009 
Companies Raising Dividends: Sysco Corp., Intel Corporation, Lancaster Colony, Brown-Forman, NSTAR, Nov 25 2009 
Lancaster Colony Corp. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 06 2009 

More From Other Websites
LANCASTER COLONY CORP Financials Feb 11 2016
Lancaster Colony’s Earnings Missed Estimates in Fiscal 2Q16 Feb 09 2016
Analysts Give Lancaster Colony a ‘Hold’ Recommendation Feb 06 2016
Analyst Recommendations for Lancaster: ~20% Rate It a “Buy” Feb 05 2016
A Tale of 2 Companies: TR and LANC Feb 05 2016
LANCASTER COLONY CORP Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Feb 05 2016
J&J Snack Foods Is Trading Below Key Moving Averages Feb 02 2016
Lancaster Colony’s Stock Falls 11% after Fiscal 2Q16 Earnings Feb 01 2016
Lancaster Colony Corp. – Value Analysis (NASDAQ:LANC) : January 29, 2016 Jan 29 2016
Lancaster’s Fiscal 1Q16 Performance Is a Good Start to the Year Jan 29 2016
Lancaster Colony Corp. Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2016 By the Numbers Jan 29 2016
Lancaster Colony Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : January 29, 2016 Jan 29 2016
Lancaster Colony Is Trading 2.6% above Its 20-Day Moving Average Jan 29 2016
Edited Transcript of LANC earnings conference call or presentation 28-Jan-16 3:00pm GMT Jan 28 2016
Lancaster Colony Corp Earnings Call scheduled for 10:00 am ET today Jan 28 2016
Lancaster Colony Reports Second Quarter Sales and Earnings Jan 28 2016
Lancaster Colony posts 2Q profit Jan 28 2016
Lancaster Colony posts 2Q profit Jan 28 2016
LANCASTER COLONY CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition Jan 28 2016
Lancaster Colony Reports Second Quarter Sales And Earnings Jan 28 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK