Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.70
MDR's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
57% of the 265 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. MDR: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
MDR' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.11  Med: 1.18 Max: 87.43
Current: 0.7
0.11
87.43
Equity to Asset 0.42
MDR's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
66% of the 267 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. MDR: 0.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
MDR' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: -0.38  Med: 0.26 Max: 0.6
Current: 0.42
-0.38
0.6
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 1.06
M-Score: -4.14
WACC vs ROIC
1.55%
4.86%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 2.53
MDR's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
64% of the 275 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.94 vs. MDR: 2.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
MDR' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -39.01  Med: 5.64 Max: 13.1
Current: 2.53
-39.01
13.1
Net-margin (%) -1.80
MDR's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
66% of the 275 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.75 vs. MDR: -1.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
MDR' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -44.78  Med: 3.63 Max: 11.79
Current: -1.8
-44.78
11.79
ROE (%) -2.77
MDR's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 270 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.46 vs. MDR: -2.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
MDR' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -439.44  Med: 10.29 Max: 183.72
Current: -2.77
-439.44
183.72
ROA (%) -1.19
MDR's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
65% of the 276 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.94 vs. MDR: -1.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
MDR' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -45.91  Med: 4.68 Max: 13.46
Current: -1.19
-45.91
13.46
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 3.49
MDR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
60% of the 274 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 6.77 vs. MDR: 3.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
MDR' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -214.25  Med: 26.44 Max: 90.82
Current: 3.49
-214.25
90.82
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -12.60
MDR's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
85% of the 220 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 7.40 vs. MDR: -12.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MDR' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: -6.55 Max: 50.1
Current: -12.6
0
50.1
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -34.20
MDR's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
91% of the 184 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 8.40 vs. MDR: -34.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MDR' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: -8.10 Max: 39.9
Current: -34.2
0
39.9
» MDR's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2014

MDR Guru Trades in Q2 2014

Stanley Druckenmiller 3,300,000 sh (New)
Arnold Van Den Berg 3,982,416 sh (+99.79%)
NWQ Managers 8,651,458 sh (+94.86%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 5,718,300 sh (+42.30%)
Alan Fournier 1,320,000 sh (+28.16%)
Chuck Royce 1,226,500 sh (+12.47%)
Richard Snow 6,145,876 sh (+11.38%)
Howard Marks 2,240,599 sh (unchged)
John Burbank Sold Out
Ronald Muhlenkamp Sold Out
Murray Stahl 24,322 sh (-2.74%)
David Einhorn 10,771,864 sh (-23.31%)
Jim Simons 93,800 sh (-77.10%)
» More
Q3 2014

MDR Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Stanley Druckenmiller 4,555,000 sh (+38.03%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 6,341,767 sh (+10.90%)
NWQ Managers 8,989,716 sh (+3.91%)
Howard Marks 2,240,599 sh (unchged)
Alan Fournier 1,320,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Murray Stahl 23,593 sh (-3.00%)
Chuck Royce 1,000,000 sh (-18.47%)
David Einhorn 2,813,064 sh (-73.89%)
Richard Snow 1,594,770 sh (-74.05%)
Arnold Van Den Berg 16,575 sh (-99.58%)
» More
Q4 2014

MDR Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Paul Tudor Jones 96,735 sh (New)
Jim Simons 2,291,800 sh (New)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 8,225,724 sh (+29.71%)
David Einhorn Sold Out
Arnold Van Den Berg Sold Out
NWQ Managers Sold Out
Chuck Royce Sold Out
Stanley Druckenmiller Sold Out
Howard Marks Sold Out
Alan Fournier 1,000,000 sh (-24.24%)
Murray Stahl 14,713 sh (-37.64%)
Richard Snow 125,790 sh (-92.11%)
» More
Q1 2015

MDR Guru Trades in Q1 2015

HOTCHKIS & WILEY 8,356,624 sh (+1.59%)
Richard Snow 125,790 sh (unchged)
Alan Fournier Sold Out
Murray Stahl 13,500 sh (-8.24%)
Paul Tudor Jones 67,595 sh (-30.12%)
Jim Simons 1,073,326 sh (-53.17%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MDR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 23.04
MDR's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
71% of the 133 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 14.93 vs. MDR: 23.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 0.74
MDR's P/B is ranked higher than
61% of the 267 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.93 vs. MDR: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
MDR' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.36  Med: 1.62 Max: 52.69
Current: 0.74
0.36
52.69
P/S 0.46
MDR's P/S is ranked higher than
67% of the 267 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.74 vs. MDR: 0.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
MDR' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.75 Max: 2.34
Current: 0.46
0.14
2.34
POCF 110.00
MDR's POCF is ranked lower than
98% of the 202 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.73 vs. MDR: 110.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
MDR' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 3.4  Med: 10.25 Max: 143.25
Current: 110
3.4
143.25
EV-to-EBIT 25.03
MDR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
77% of the 195 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.88 vs. MDR: 25.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MDR' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: -25.4  Med: 7.15 Max: 89.2
Current: 25.03
-25.4
89.2
Shiller P/E 19.23
MDR's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
66% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 13.58 vs. MDR: 19.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
MDR' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 3.94  Med: 8.78 Max: 86.65
Current: 19.23
3.94
86.65
Current Ratio 1.64
MDR's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 269 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.82 vs. MDR: 1.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MDR' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.66  Med: 1.10 Max: 1.87
Current: 1.64
0.66
1.87
Quick Ratio 1.64
MDR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 269 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.51 vs. MDR: 1.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MDR' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.65  Med: 1.06 Max: 1.87
Current: 1.64
0.65
1.87
Days Sales Outstanding 34.61
MDR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
93% of the 238 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 69.68 vs. MDR: 34.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MDR' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 22.74  Med: 53.17 Max: 130.3
Current: 34.61
22.74
130.3

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.74
MDR's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
65% of the 244 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. MDR: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
MDR' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.46  Med: 1.63 Max: 74.28
Current: 0.74
0.46
74.28
Price/Projected FCF 7.22
MDR's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
91% of the 116 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. MDR: 7.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
MDR' s 10-Year Price/Projected FCF Range
Min: 0.14  Med: 1.00 Max: 916
Current: 7.22
0.14
916
Price/Median PS Value 0.62
MDR's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
53% of the 251 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. MDR: 0.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
MDR' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.45 Max: 2.85
Current: 0.62
0.07
2.85
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 4.00
MDR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
55% of the 273 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.60 vs. MDR: 4.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
MDR' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 1.1  Med: 13.00 Max: 922.9
Current: 4
1.1
922.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -32.70
MDR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
85% of the 136 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 6.38 vs. MDR: -32.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
MDR' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: -31  Med: 1.40 Max: 77.8
Current: -32.7
-31
77.8

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Services » Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare:BOUYY, VCISY, GPOVY, MTZ, SGGKY » details
Traded in other countries:MIQ.Germany,
McDermott International Inc was incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Panama in 1959. It is an engineering, procurement, construction and installation ("EPCI") company focused on designing and executing complex offshore oil and gas projects worldwide. The Company is a U.S.-based engineering and construction ("E&C") companies principally focused on the upstream offshore oil and gas sector. Its customers include national, major integrated and other oil and gas companies. The Company's operating segments consist of Asia Pacific, the Atlantic, Caspian and the Middle East. The Caspian and Middle East operating segments are aggregated into the Middle East reporting segment due to the proximity of regions and similarities in the nature of services provided, economic characteristics and oversight responsibilities. Through Asia Pacific segment, it serves the needs of customers primarily in Australia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Malaysia and Thailand. Project focus in this segment includes the fabrication and installation of fixed and floating structures and the installation of pipelines and subsea systems. Through Atlantic segment, it serves the needs of customers primarily in the United States, Brazil, Mexico, Trinidad and Africa. Project focus in this segment includes the fabrication and installation of fixed and floating structures and the installation of pipelines and subsea systems. Engineering and procurement services are supported by engineering resources in Dubai and Chennai. The primary fabrication facility for this segment is located in Altamira, Mexico. Through Middle East segment, which includes the Caspian region, it serves the needs of customers primarily in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.), Kuwait, India, Azerbaijan, Russia, and the North Sea. Project focus in this segment relates primarily to the fabrication and offshore installation of fixed and floating structures and the installation of pipelines and subsea systems. The majority of the projects in this segment are performed on an EPCI basis. Engineering and procurement services are provided by Dubai, U.A.E., Chennai, India, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia and United Kingdom offices and are supported by additional resources from Houston and Baku, Azerbaijan offices. The Asia Pacific segment's key competitors include: Allseas Marine Contractors S.A.; Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd.; EMAS Offshore Pte Ltd.; Heerema Group; Hyundai Heavy Industrial Co., Ltd.; Nippon Steel Corporation; Saipem S.P.A.; Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.; Sapura Kencana Petroleum; Subsea 7 S.A.; Swiber Holdings Ltd.; and Technip S.A. The Atlantic segment's key competitors include: Allseas Marine Contractors S.A.; Dragados Offshore Mexico, S.A.; Gulf Island Fabrication Inc.; Heerema Group; EMAS Offshore Pte Ltd.; KBR, Inc.; Kiewit Corporation; Saipem S.P.A.; Subsea 7 S.A.; and Technip S.A. The Middle East segment's key competitors include: Hyundai Heavy Industrial Co. L
» More Articles for MDR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Best Performing Oil and Gas Stocks in 2015 Jul 06 2015 
McDermott International (MDR) and Nutrisystem (NTRI) Surprise Profit, Connecture (CNXR) Expectations Mar 03 2015 
Greenlight Capital Fourth Quarter Letter To Investors Jan 22 2015 
GE Strikes A New Chord In The Oil And Gas Segment Jan 16 2015 
Top Guru-Owned Small-Cap Stocks Jun 13 2014 
Investor Arnold Van Den Berg Buys Another Slew of Miners in Q1 Apr 08 2014 
Five-Year Lows: Boardwalk Pipeline Partners LP, Piedmont Office Realty Trust Inc., Murphy USA Inc. a Mar 17 2014 
David Einhorn Buys Oil Companies, EMC, TTWO, MDR Feb 17 2014 
Gulf of Mexico Feb 10 2013 
Weekly CEO Buys Highlight: MDR, MASI, FCH, FGP, FUR Jun 10 2012 

More From Other Websites
MCDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL INC Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Financial... Jul 30 2015
McDermott Announces Date for Second Quarter 2015 Financial Results and Conference Call Jul 29 2015
McDermott Announces Date for Second Quarter 2015 Financial Results and Conference Call Jul 29 2015
Energy-Focused Fund’s Picks Returned 27% in Q2; See Them Inside Jul 22 2015
McDermott Gets Long-Term EPCI Contract from Saudi Aramco - Analyst Blog Jul 08 2015
McDermott Signs Long Term EPCI Agreement with Saudi Aramco Jul 07 2015
McDermott Signs Long Term EPCI Agreement with Saudi Aramco Jul 07 2015
The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Core Laboratories, McDermott International... Jul 01 2015
Oil & Gas Stock Roundup: Exxon Stops Drilling Off Santa Barbara, Chevron Sells Nigeria Oil Blocks -... Jun 30 2015
McDermott Gets Otis Project Contract from LLOG Exploration - Analyst Blog Jun 25 2015
McDermott Int'l. (MDR) Stock Gains After Announcing Lump Sum Contract Jun 23 2015
McDermott Awarded Otis Field Subsea Tieback Project by LLOG Jun 23 2015
McDermott Awarded Otis Field Subsea Tieback Project by LLOG Jun 23 2015
Qingdao McDermott Wuchuan Awarded Module Fabrication Contract for Yamal LNG Project Jun 18 2015
Hedge Fund Manager Michael Blitzer’s Under-The-Radar Stock Picks Jun 18 2015
McDermott traders drill for gains Jun 08 2015
McDermott Receives Ayatsil-C EPCI Contract from Pemex - Analyst Blog Jun 05 2015
McDermott Wins PEMEX Bay of Campeche Ayatsil-C EPCI Contract Jun 04 2015
McDermott Wins PEMEX Bay of Campeche Ayatsil-C EPCI Contract Jun 04 2015
CORRECTING and REPLACING McDermott to Present at Credit Suisse 2015 Engineering & Construction... Jun 03 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK