Hide

FocusBar

Subscribe to Premium Member
Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a companyย’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.142
MG's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
76% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.96 vs. MG: 0.142 )
MG' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.06   Max: 0.6
Current: 0.14

0.06
0.6
Equity to Asset 0.187
MG's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
87% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.35 vs. MG: 0.187 )
MG' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: -0.65   Max: 0.37
Current: 0.19

-0.65
0.37
Interest Coverage 9.7
MG's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
58% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 92.00 vs. MG: 9.7 )
MG' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 3   Max: 11
Current: 9.7

3
11
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 3.83
M-Score: -2.68
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the companyย’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
ย•ย•3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rankย•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 8.40
MG's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
86% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.70 vs. MG: 8.40 )
MG' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: 7.1   Max: 10.7
Current: 8.4

7.1
10.7
Net-margin (%) 4.9
MG's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
83% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.90 vs. MG: 4.9 )
MG' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: 2.6   Max: 4.9
Current: 4.9

2.6
4.9
ROE (%) 11.1
MG's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
85% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.20 vs. MG: 11.1 )
MG' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: 8   Max: 11.1
Current: 11.1

8
11.1
ROA (%) 6.5
MG's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. MG: 6.5 )
MG' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: 3.6   Max: 6.6
Current: 6.5

3.6
6.6
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 27.00
MG's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 12.00 vs. MG: 27.00 )
MG' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 22.2   Max: 30.7
Current: 27

22.2
30.7
ยป MG's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2012

MG Guru Trades in Q2 2012

Ron Baron 2,109,800 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
NWQ Managers 240,890 sh (-0.22%)
Robert Olstein 10,000 sh (-16.67%)
» More
Q3 2012

MG Guru Trades in Q3 2012

Jim Simons 27,800 sh (New)
Robert Olstein 24,000 sh (+140%)
Ron Baron 2,109,800 sh (unchged)
NWQ Managers 223,636 sh (-7.16%)
» More
Q4 2012

MG Guru Trades in Q4 2012

NWQ Managers 372,547 sh (+66.59%)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Ron Baron 2,109,250 sh (-0.03%)
Robert Olstein 23,000 sh (-4.17%)
» More
Q1 2013

MG Guru Trades in Q1 2013

Joel Greenblatt 58,188 sh (New)
NWQ Managers 806,189 sh (+116.4%)
Robert Olstein 26,000 sh (+13.04%)
Ron Baron 2,100,000 sh (-0.44%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MG

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
NWQ Managers 2013-03-31 Add 116.4%0.09%$20.27 - $25.04 $ 20.95-6%806189
Joel Greenblatt 2013-03-31 New Buy0.07%$20.27 - $25.04 $ 20.95-6%58188
NWQ Managers 2012-12-31 Add 66.59%0.03%$19.25 - $23.96 $ 20.95-4%372547
Robert Olstein 2012-09-30 Add 140%0.06%$19.67 - $26.96 $ 20.95-9%24000
Robert Olstein 2011-12-31 Reduce -62.5%0.08%$18 - $25.8 $ 20.95-7%12000
NWQ Managers 2011-12-31 New Buy0.04%$18 - $25.8 $ 20.95-7%230654
Robert Olstein 2011-09-30 New Buy0.12%$16.07 - $20.51 $ 20.9516%32000
Ron Baron 2010-03-31 Add 27.27%0.04%$9.97 - $15.06 $ 20.9562%2545433
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 26.00
MG's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
61% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.41 vs. MG: 26.00 )
MG' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 21.79   Max: 107.57
Current: 26

21.79
107.57
P/B 3.06
MG's P/B is ranked lower than
77% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. MG: 3.06 )
MG' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 1.9   Max: 4.03
Current: 3.06

1.9
4.03
P/S 1.19
MG's P/S is ranked lower than
82% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.38 vs. MG: 1.19 )
MG' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.87   Max: 1.83
Current: 1.19

0.87
1.83
PFCF 24.65
MG's PFCF is ranked lower than
52% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.28 vs. MG: 24.65 )
MG' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 11.96   Max: 159.31
Current: 24.65

11.96
159.31
EV-to-EBIT 16.78
MG's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
71% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 12.83 vs. MG: 16.78 )
MG' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 12.3   Max: 27.3
Current: 16.78

12.3
27.3

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 7.4
MG's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked higher than
93% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.65 vs. MG: 7.4 )
MG' s 10-Year Price/Net Current Asset Value Range
Min: 6.7   Max: 8.1
Current: 7.4

6.7
8.1
Price/Tangible Book 9.6
MG's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
99% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.80 vs. MG: 9.6 )
MG' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 4.2   Max: 10.5
Current: 9.6

4.2
10.5
Price/Median PS Value 1
MG's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
87% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. MG: 1 )
MG' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.8   Max: 1.1
Current: 1

0.8
1.1
Price/Graham Number 3.5
MG's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
98% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. MG: 3.5 )
MG' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 2.3   Max: 3.8
Current: 3.5

2.3
3.8
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) 6.00
MG's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) is ranked higher than
82% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.70 vs. MG: 6.00 )
MG' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) Range
Min: 3.7   Max: 8.1
Current: 6

3.7
8.1

Business Description

Mistras Group, Inc. formerly known as Mistras Holdings Corp. was incorporated in Delaware. The Company and its subsidiaries is a global provider of technology-enabled asset protection solutions, which combines the skill and experience of certified technicians, engineers and scientists with non-destructive testing (NDT), mechanical integrity services, and plant conditioning monitoring software and systems (PCMS), to evaluate the structural integrity of critical energy, industrial and public infrastructure. The Company serves a global customer base, including companies in the oil and gas, power generation and transmission, public infrastructure, chemicals, aerospace and defense, transportation, metals and metalworking, pharmaceuticals and food processing industries. Its asset protection solutions have evolved over time as it has combined the disciplines of NDT, MI services and data analysis software to provide value to its customers. It makes NDT a highly attractive alternative to many traditional intrusive inspection techniques, which might require dismantling equipment or shutting down a plant, refinery, mill or site. MI services involve conducting an inventory of infrastructure assets, developing and implementing inspection and maintenance procedures, training personnel in executing these procedures and managing inspections, testing and assessments of customer assets. It provides a range of solutions that includes: traditional outsourced NDT services conducted by its technicians, mechanical integrity assessments, above-ground storage tank inspection and American Petroleum Institute visual inspections and predictive maintenance program development; advanced asset protection solutions, in most cases involving proprietary AE, digital radiography, infrared, wireless and/or automated ultrasonic sensors; a proprietary and customized portfolio of software products for testing and analyzing data captured in real-time by technicians and sensors, including advanced features such as pattern recognition and neural networks; enterprise software and relational databases to store and analyze inspection data comparing to prior operations and testing of similar assets, industrial standards and specific risk conditions, such as use with highly flammable or corrosive materials, and developing asset integrity management plans; on-line monitoring systems that provide for secure web-based remote or on-site asset inspection, real-time reports about and analysis of plant or enterprise-wide structural integrity data, comparison of integrity data to library of historical inspection data and analysis to better assess structural integrity. It provides a range of testing and inspection services to customer base across energy-related, industrial and public infrastructure industries.
Company Website
SEC Reports
Industry: Engineering & Construction
Compare:

Personalized Checklist








Within your circle of competence?
Macro economic environment favorable?
High quality business?
Enough margin of safety with stocks?
Gurus are buying?
Insiders are buying?
Management capable and shareholder friendly?
Catalyst for stock price to appreciate?
Your level of confidence with the research?

GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names
Free 7-day Trial