Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 3.34
MLR's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
69% of the 1251 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.72 vs. MLR: 3.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
MLR' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 1.35 Max: 18793.5
Current: 3.34
0.04
18793.5
Equity to Asset 0.59
MLR's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
68% of the 1232 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. MLR: 0.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
MLR' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.62 Max: 0.84
Current: 0.59
0.21
0.84
Interest Coverage 26.91
MLR's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
68% of the 935 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 10.83 vs. MLR: 26.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
MLR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.19  Med: 22.41 Max: 64.48
Current: 26.91
6.19
64.48
F-Score: 2
Z-Score: 4.03
M-Score: -2.33
WACC vs ROIC
5.79%
11.88%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 4.56
MLR's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
54% of the 1242 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 5.26 vs. MLR: 4.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
MLR' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.84  Med: 4.69 Max: 9.24
Current: 4.56
2.84
9.24
Net-margin (%) 2.89
MLR's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
57% of the 1243 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 3.76 vs. MLR: 2.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
MLR' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.32  Med: 2.99 Max: 11.07
Current: 2.89
1.32
11.07
ROE (%) 9.44
MLR's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
54% of the 1223 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.52 vs. MLR: 9.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
MLR' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.71  Med: 8.52 Max: 50.91
Current: 9.44
2.71
50.91
ROA (%) 5.86
MLR's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
64% of the 1261 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 3.98 vs. MLR: 5.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
MLR' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.97  Med: 6.05 Max: 26.52
Current: 5.86
1.97
26.52
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 20.19
MLR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
64% of the 1258 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 13.17 vs. MLR: 20.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
MLR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.34  Med: 20.46 Max: 41.54
Current: 20.19
7.34
41.54
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 16.10
MLR's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 1114 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 3.30 vs. MLR: 16.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MLR' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.4  Med: 12.20 Max: 40.8
Current: 16.1
-29.4
40.8
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 19.00
MLR's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
76% of the 1012 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 6.50 vs. MLR: 19.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MLR' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29  Med: -6.50 Max: 57.8
Current: 19
-29
57.8
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 20.20
MLR's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
70% of the 888 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 6.60 vs. MLR: 20.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MLR' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.6  Med: 17.10 Max: 119.6
Current: 20.2
-42.6
119.6
» MLR's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

MLR Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Charles Brandes 12,800 sh (New)
Robert Olstein 115,000 sh (+51.32%)
Chuck Royce 1,585,171 sh (+0.63%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,572,039 sh (-3.12%)
» More
Q3 2015

MLR Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jim Simons 18,700 sh (New)
Charles Brandes 24,800 sh (+93.75%)
Robert Olstein 130,000 sh (+13.04%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,603,116 sh (+1.98%)
Chuck Royce 1,577,886 sh (-0.46%)
CI Can Am Small Cap 154,864 sh (-19.58%)
» More
Q4 2015

MLR Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Charles Brandes 28,608 sh (+15.35%)
Chuck Royce 1,587,373 sh (+0.60%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,579,929 sh (-1.45%)
Robert Olstein 128,000 sh (-1.54%)
Jim Simons 11,500 sh (-38.50%)
» More
Q1 2016

MLR Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 40,400 sh (+251.30%)
Charles Brandes 29,446 sh (+2.93%)
Chuck Royce 1,587,761 sh (+0.02%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,510,607 sh (-4.39%)
Robert Olstein 105,500 sh (-17.58%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MLR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Autos » Auto Parts
Compare:OTCPK:NFGRF, NAS:CVGI, NAS:WKHS, NAS:STRT, OTCPK:TKTDY, OTCPK:AKBIF, AMEX:UFAB, OTCPK:IOCJY, NAS:CAAS, NAS:WPRT, NAS:FSYS, NAS:VOXX, NAS:FENX, NYSE:ACW, OTCPK:CTXR, OTCPK:EXCOF, NYSE:SRI, NYSE:ZX, OTCPK:LEOM, NYSE:MOD » details
Miller Industries Inc is the manufacturer of towing and recovery equipment, with executive offices in Ooltewah, Tennessee, domestic manufacturing operations in Tennessee and Pennsylvania, and foreign manufacturing operations in France and the UK.

Miller Industries Inc., was founded in 1994 and is based in Ooltewah,Tennessee. The Company is the manufacturer of towing and recovery equipment, with executive offices in Ooltewah, Tennessee, domestic manufacturing operations in Tennessee and Pennsylvania, and foreign manufacturing operations in France and the United Kingdom. The Company provides a range of towing and recovery equipment products that meet customer design, capacity and cost requirements. It manufactures the bodies of wreckers and car carriers, which are installed on truck chassis manufactured by third parties. The Company manufactures a broad line of wrecker, car carrier and trailer bodies to meet a full range of customer design, capacity and cost requirements. Wreckers are generally used to recover and tow disabled vehicles and other equipment and range in type from the conventional tow truck to large recovery vehicles with up to 75-ton lifting capacities. Car carriers are specialized flat-bed vehicles with hydraulic tilt mechanisms that enable a towing operator to drive or winch a vehicle onto the bed for transport. Car carriers are used to transport new or disabled vehicles and other equipment and are particularly effective for transporting vehicles or other equipment over longer distances. Its multi-vehicle transport trailers are specialized auto transport trailers with upper and lower decks and hydraulic ramps for loading vehicles. These trailers are used for moving multiple vehicles for auto auctions, car dealerships, leasing companies and other similar applications. It manufactures and markets its wreckers, car carriers and trailers under ten separate brand names. It purchases raw materials and component parts from a number of sources. Management categorizes the towing and recovery market into three general product types: light duty wreckers; heavy duty wreckers; and car carriers. The light duty wrecker market consists of professional wrecker operators, repossession towing services, local and national governmental entities and repair shop or salvages company owners. The heavy duty market includes professional wrecker operators serving the needs of commercial vehicle operators as well as governmental entities. The car carrier market has expanded to include equipment rental companies that offer delivery service and professional towing operators who desire to complement their existing towing capabilities. The towing and recovery equipment manufacturing industry is competitive for sales to distributors and towing operators. Its operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of materials into the environment. Its products are sold through independent distributors that serve all 50 states, Canada and Mexico, and other foreign markets including Europe, the Pacific Rim, the Middle East, South America and Africa, and through prime contractors to government

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 14.46
MLR's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
51% of the 1004 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 14.60 vs. MLR: 14.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
MLR' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.53  Med: 14.63 Max: 30.8
Current: 14.46
3.53
30.8
PE(NRI) 14.46
MLR's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
51% of the 1010 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 14.79 vs. MLR: 14.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
MLR' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.54  Med: 14.62 Max: 30.71
Current: 14.46
3.54
30.71
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 72.80
MLR's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked lower than
90% of the 536 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 15.07 vs. MLR: 72.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
MLR' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.56  Med: 16.25 Max: 243.52
Current: 72.8
3.56
243.52
P/B 1.35
MLR's P/B is ranked higher than
52% of the 1209 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.43 vs. MLR: 1.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
MLR' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.43  Med: 1.22 Max: 4.5
Current: 1.35
0.43
4.5
P/S 0.42
MLR's P/S is ranked higher than
66% of the 1225 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.68 vs. MLR: 0.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
MLR' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.51 Max: 0.88
Current: 0.42
0.2
0.88
POCF 25.33
MLR's POCF is ranked lower than
90% of the 634 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 7.46 vs. MLR: 25.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
MLR' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.64  Med: 13.48 Max: 180.57
Current: 25.33
3.64
180.57
EV-to-EBIT 8.29
MLR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
68% of the 1034 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 11.99 vs. MLR: 8.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MLR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.5  Med: 8.10 Max: 13.8
Current: 8.29
3.5
13.8
EV-to-EBITDA 7.08
MLR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
60% of the 1085 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.47 vs. MLR: 7.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MLR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3  Med: 6.90 Max: 10.9
Current: 7.08
3
10.9
PEG 13.18
MLR's PEG is ranked lower than
93% of the 551 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.41 vs. MLR: 13.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
MLR' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 1.55 Max: 73.57
Current: 13.18
0.28
73.57
Shiller P/E 14.42
MLR's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
74% of the 194 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 25.43 vs. MLR: 14.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
MLR' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.52  Med: 14.76 Max: 302
Current: 14.42
11.52
302
Current Ratio 2.21
MLR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
72% of the 1108 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.56 vs. MLR: 2.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MLR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.92  Med: 2.44 Max: 4.23
Current: 2.21
0.92
4.23
Quick Ratio 1.56
MLR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
70% of the 1108 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. MLR: 1.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MLR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.53  Med: 1.65 Max: 2.89
Current: 1.56
0.53
2.89
Days Inventory 46.53
MLR's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
64% of the 1202 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 58.68 vs. MLR: 46.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
MLR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 42.53  Med: 48.25 Max: 71.43
Current: 46.53
42.53
71.43
Days Sales Outstanding 83.19
MLR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
72% of the 1014 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 59.83 vs. MLR: 83.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MLR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 54.03  Med: 71.05 Max: 86.29
Current: 83.19
54.03
86.29
Days Payable 63.83
MLR's Days Payable is ranked higher than
61% of the 990 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 51.98 vs. MLR: 63.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
MLR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 34.54  Med: 45.01 Max: 61.2
Current: 63.83
34.54
61.2

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 3.17
MLR's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
67% of the 1249 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.34 vs. MLR: 3.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
MLR' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 2.97 Max: 3.64
Current: 3.17
0.6
3.64
Dividend Payout 0.45
MLR's Dividend Payout is ranked lower than
71% of the 828 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.28 vs. MLR: 0.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
MLR' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.55 Max: 1.17
Current: 0.45
0.2
1.17
Dividend Growth (3y) 7.20
MLR's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked lower than
55% of the 658 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.80 vs. MLR: 7.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
MLR' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 77.6
Current: 7.2
0
77.6
Forward Dividend Yield 3.27
MLR's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
66% of the 1224 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.46 vs. MLR: 3.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 13.33
MLR's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
92% of the 1481 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.84 vs. MLR: 13.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
MLR' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.52  Med: 12.45 Max: 15.26
Current: 13.33
2.52
15.26
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.50
MLR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
64% of the 572 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: -1.70 vs. MLR: -0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MLR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.4  Med: -0.50 Max: 1.7
Current: -0.5
-10.4
1.7

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 1.98
MLR's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked higher than
80% of the 535 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 4.92 vs. MLR: 1.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
MLR' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 1.90 Max: 89.4
Current: 1.98
0.8
89.4
Price/Tangible Book 1.44
MLR's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
53% of the 1172 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.57 vs. MLR: 1.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
MLR' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 1.42 Max: 8.27
Current: 1.44
0.4
8.27
Price/Projected FCF 1.14
MLR's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
52% of the 613 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.11 vs. MLR: 1.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
MLR' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.42  Med: 0.86 Max: 2.42
Current: 1.14
0.42
2.42
Price/Median PS Value 0.82
MLR's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
79% of the 1182 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. MLR: 0.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
MLR' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.98 Max: 6.7
Current: 0.82
0.1
6.7
Price/Graham Number 0.97
MLR's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
53% of the 839 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. MLR: 0.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
MLR' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.53  Med: 1.08 Max: 5.63
Current: 0.97
0.53
5.63
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 12.10
MLR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
74% of the 1241 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 7.00 vs. MLR: 12.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
MLR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.3  Med: 12.40 Max: 28.2
Current: 12.1
7.3
28.2
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 0.17
MLR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
61% of the 685 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 5.44 vs. MLR: 0.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
MLR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.6  Med: 6.20 Max: 21.9
Current: 0.17
-14.6
21.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $563.0
EPS (TTM) $ 1.44
Beta0.54
Short Percentage of Float2.50%
52-Week Range $17.00 - 23.79
Shares Outstanding (Mil)11.35
» More Articles for MLR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Guru Stocks Raising Dividends: PNY, MLR, MAIN, GD, SPLS Mar 11 2012 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 09 2010 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Aug 04 2010 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) May 04 2010 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 09 2009 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Aug 06 2009 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) May 07 2009 

More From Other Websites
MILLER INDUSTRIES INC /TN/ Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation... Jun 24 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : June 10, 2016 Jun 10 2016
MILLER INDUSTRIES INC /TN/ Files SEC form 8-K, Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Jun 02 2016
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) :MLR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2016 By the Numbers May 17 2016
MILLER INDUSTRIES INC /TN/ Financials May 12 2016
MILLER INDUSTRIES REPORTS 2016 FIRST QUARTER RESULTS May 05 2016
MILLER INDUSTRIES INC /TN/ Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition,... May 04 2016
Miller Industries Reports 2016 First Quarter Results May 04 2016
Q1 2016 Miller Industries Inc Earnings Release - After Market Close May 04 2016
Miller Industries Announces Webcast Apr 28 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : March 22, 2016 Mar 22 2016
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) :MLR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2015 By the Numbers Mar 14 2016
Miller Industries posts 4Q profit Mar 09 2016
Miller Industries posts 4Q profit Mar 09 2016
MILLER INDUSTRIES INC /TN/ Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition,... Mar 09 2016
Miller Industries Reports 2015 Fourth Quarter And Full Year Results Mar 09 2016
Miller Industries Announces Webcast Mar 03 2016
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2015 By the Numbers Dec 23 2015
Attunity Ltd (ATTU): Hedge Funds Are Snapping Up Dec 01 2015
Smart Money Cautiously Optimistic of Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) Nov 30 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)