Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 1.64
NYSE:MLR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
66% of the 1251 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.59 vs. NYSE:MLR: 1.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:MLR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 1.35 Max: 18793.5
Current: 1.64
0.04
18793.5
Equity-to-Asset 0.62
NYSE:MLR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
71% of the 1244 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. NYSE:MLR: 0.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:MLR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.61 Max: 0.84
Current: 0.62
0.21
0.84
Interest Coverage 29.00
NYSE:MLR's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
57% of the 1161 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 18.14 vs. NYSE:MLR: 29.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:MLR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.65  Med: 22.41 Max: 63.25
Current: 29
4.65
63.25
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 4.57
Beneish M-Score: -2.22
WACC vs ROIC
5.98%
12.69%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 5.10
NYSE:MLR's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
52% of the 1256 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 5.37 vs. NYSE:MLR: 5.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:MLR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.13  Med: 4.69 Max: 9.24
Current: 5.1
2.13
9.24
Net Margin % 3.28
NYSE:MLR's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
54% of the 1256 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 3.81 vs. NYSE:MLR: 3.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:MLR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.32  Med: 2.99 Max: 11.07
Current: 3.28
1.32
11.07
ROE % 10.90
NYSE:MLR's ROE % is ranked higher than
59% of the 1231 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.68 vs. NYSE:MLR: 10.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:MLR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.71  Med: 8.52 Max: 50.91
Current: 10.9
2.71
50.91
ROA % 6.69
NYSE:MLR's ROA % is ranked higher than
70% of the 1272 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 3.93 vs. NYSE:MLR: 6.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:MLR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.97  Med: 6.05 Max: 26.52
Current: 6.69
1.97
26.52
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 21.05
NYSE:MLR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
65% of the 1267 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 14.12 vs. NYSE:MLR: 21.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:MLR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.34  Med: 20.46 Max: 41.05
Current: 21.05
7.34
41.05
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 16.10
NYSE:MLR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
87% of the 1107 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. NYSE:MLR: 16.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:MLR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.4  Med: 8 Max: 40.7
Current: 16.1
-29.4
40.7
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 20.70
NYSE:MLR's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
72% of the 1022 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.10 vs. NYSE:MLR: 20.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:MLR' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.1  Med: -6.5 Max: 57.3
Current: 20.7
-29.1
57.3
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 19.80
NYSE:MLR's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
69% of the 913 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. NYSE:MLR: 19.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:MLR' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.5  Med: -5.1 Max: 119.6
Current: 19.8
-42.5
119.6
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with Miller Industries Inc. $NYSE:MLR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:MLR's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

MLR Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 40,400 sh (+251.30%)
CI Can Am Small Cap 159,614 sh (+3.07%)
Charles Brandes 29,446 sh (+2.93%)
Chuck Royce 1,587,761 sh (+0.02%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,510,607 sh (-4.39%)
Robert Olstein 105,500 sh (-17.58%)
» More
Q2 2016

MLR Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 55,700 sh (+37.87%)
Charles Brandes 29,561 sh (+0.39%)
Chuck Royce 1,588,378 sh (+0.04%)
Robert Olstein 104,270 sh (-1.17%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,399,107 sh (-7.38%)
» More
Q3 2016

MLR Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Robert Olstein 104,575 sh (+0.29%)
CI Can Am Small Cap 159,614 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 1,582,737 sh (-0.36%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,391,975 sh (-0.51%)
Jim Simons 55,200 sh (-0.90%)
Charles Brandes 29,271 sh (-0.98%)
» More
Q4 2016

MLR Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Charles Brandes Sold Out
Chuck Royce 1,545,143 sh (-2.38%)
Jim Simons 52,400 sh (-5.07%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,187,745 sh (-14.67%)
Robert Olstein 87,236 sh (-16.58%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MLR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Autos » Auto Parts    NAICS: 336999    SIC: 3713
Compare:OTCPK:EXCOF, NAS:CVGI, OTCPK:TKTDY, NAS:CAAS, NAS:WPRT, AMEX:UFAB, OTCPK:ESSI, NAS:WKHS, NAS:STRT, NAS:VOXX, NYSE:SRI, NYSE:ZX, OTCPK:CRGS, OTCPK:OBTEF, OTCPK:CTXR, NAS:MPAA, AMEX:UQM, OTCPK:AMZKF, OTCPK:UGHL, NAS:SYPR » details
Miller Industries Inc is the manufacturer of towing and recovery equipment, with executive offices in Ooltewah, Tennessee, domestic manufacturing operations in Tennessee and Pennsylvania, and foreign manufacturing operations in France and the UK.

Miller Industries Inc., was founded in 1994 and is based in Ooltewah,Tennessee. The Company is the manufacturer of towing and recovery equipment, with executive offices in Ooltewah, Tennessee, domestic manufacturing operations in Tennessee and Pennsylvania, and foreign manufacturing operations in France and the United Kingdom. The Company provides a range of towing and recovery equipment products that meet customer design, capacity and cost requirements. It manufactures the bodies of wreckers and car carriers, which are installed on truck chassis manufactured by third parties. The Company manufactures a broad line of wrecker, car carrier and trailer bodies to meet a full range of customer design, capacity and cost requirements. Wreckers are generally used to recover and tow disabled vehicles and other equipment and range in type from the conventional tow truck to large recovery vehicles with up to 75-ton lifting capacities. Car carriers are specialized flat-bed vehicles with hydraulic tilt mechanisms that enable a towing operator to drive or winch a vehicle onto the bed for transport. Car carriers are used to transport new or disabled vehicles and other equipment and are particularly effective for transporting vehicles or other equipment over longer distances. Its multi-vehicle transport trailers are specialized auto transport trailers with upper and lower decks and hydraulic ramps for loading vehicles. These trailers are used for moving multiple vehicles for auto auctions, car dealerships, leasing companies and other similar applications. It manufactures and markets its wreckers, car carriers and trailers under ten separate brand names. It purchases raw materials and component parts from a number of sources. Management categorizes the towing and recovery market into three general product types: light duty wreckers; heavy duty wreckers; and car carriers. The light duty wrecker market consists of professional wrecker operators, repossession towing services, local and national governmental entities and repair shop or salvages company owners. The heavy duty market includes professional wrecker operators serving the needs of commercial vehicle operators as well as governmental entities. The car carrier market has expanded to include equipment rental companies that offer delivery service and professional towing operators who desire to complement their existing towing capabilities. The towing and recovery equipment manufacturing industry is competitive for sales to distributors and towing operators. Its operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of materials into the environment. Its products are sold through independent distributors that serve all 50 states, Canada and Mexico, and other foreign markets including Europe, the Pacific Rim, the Middle East, South America and Africa, and through prime contractors to government

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 14.92
MLR's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 1076 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 17.25 vs. MLR: 14.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
MLR' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.53  Med: 14.59 Max: 30.71
Current: 14.92
3.53
30.71
PE Ratio without NRI 14.92
MLR's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
60% of the 1028 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 17.46 vs. MLR: 14.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
MLR' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.37  Med: 14.59 Max: 30.71
Current: 14.92
6.37
30.71
PB Ratio 1.63
MLR's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 1288 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.70 vs. MLR: 1.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
MLR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.43  Med: 1.23 Max: 4.5
Current: 1.63
0.43
4.5
PS Ratio 0.49
MLR's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
68% of the 1283 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.80 vs. MLR: 0.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
MLR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.5 Max: 0.88
Current: 0.49
0.2
0.88
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 50.90
MLR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
96% of the 695 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.72 vs. MLR: 50.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
MLR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.64  Med: 13.78 Max: 180.57
Current: 50.9
3.64
180.57
EV-to-EBIT 9.21
MLR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
74% of the 1121 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 13.44 vs. MLR: 9.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MLR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.5  Med: 8 Max: 13.8
Current: 9.21
3.5
13.8
EV-to-EBITDA 7.94
MLR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
61% of the 1165 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 10.62 vs. MLR: 7.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MLR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3  Med: 6.9 Max: 10.4
Current: 7.94
3
10.4
PEG Ratio 10.50
MLR's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
90% of the 567 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.63 vs. MLR: 10.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
MLR' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.51  Med: 1.73 Max: 73.57
Current: 10.5
0.51
73.57
Shiller PE Ratio 17.82
MLR's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
75% of the 204 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 30.35 vs. MLR: 17.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
MLR' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.44  Med: 15.02 Max: 302
Current: 17.82
11.44
302
Current Ratio 2.52
MLR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
77% of the 1173 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.53 vs. MLR: 2.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MLR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.92  Med: 2.37 Max: 4.23
Current: 2.52
0.92
4.23
Quick Ratio 1.81
MLR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
76% of the 1173 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.10 vs. MLR: 1.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MLR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.53  Med: 1.65 Max: 2.89
Current: 1.81
0.53
2.89
Days Inventory 46.80
MLR's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
62% of the 1216 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 56.23 vs. MLR: 46.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
MLR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 42.53  Med: 48.25 Max: 71.43
Current: 46.8
42.53
71.43
Days Sales Outstanding 78.03
MLR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
69% of the 1005 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 60.62 vs. MLR: 78.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MLR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 54.03  Med: 71.05 Max: 86.29
Current: 78.03
54.03
86.29
Days Payable 48.15
MLR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
55% of the 943 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 53.34 vs. MLR: 48.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
MLR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 34.54  Med: 45.01 Max: 61.2
Current: 48.15
34.54
61.2

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 2.68
MLR's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
68% of the 1285 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. MLR: 2.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
MLR' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 2.97 Max: 3.64
Current: 2.68
0.6
3.64
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.39
MLR's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 776 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.30 vs. MLR: 0.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
MLR' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.46 Max: 0.68
Current: 0.39
0.1
0.68
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 7.20
MLR's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
55% of the 672 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 9.40 vs. MLR: 7.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
MLR' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 77.6
Current: 7.2
0
77.6
Forward Dividend Yield % 2.66
MLR's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
64% of the 1261 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.14 vs. MLR: 2.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 11.24
MLR's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
90% of the 1618 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.58 vs. MLR: 11.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
MLR' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.52  Med: 12.45 Max: 15.26
Current: 11.24
2.52
15.26
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.50
MLR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
63% of the 570 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: -2.00 vs. MLR: -0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MLR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.4  Med: -0.5 Max: 1.7
Current: -0.5
-10.4
1.7

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 2.49
MLR's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked higher than
75% of the 604 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 5.86 vs. MLR: 2.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
MLR' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 1.9 Max: 89.4
Current: 2.49
0.8
89.4
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.68
MLR's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
54% of the 1226 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.88 vs. MLR: 1.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
MLR' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 1.4 Max: 8.27
Current: 1.68
0.39
8.27
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.49
MLR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
54% of the 643 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.38 vs. MLR: 1.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
MLR' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 0.86 Max: 1.98
Current: 1.49
0.35
1.98
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.98
MLR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
77% of the 1193 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. MLR: 0.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
MLR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.97 Max: 6.7
Current: 0.98
0.1
6.7
Price-to-Graham-Number 1.06
MLR's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
59% of the 947 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. MLR: 1.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
MLR' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.53  Med: 1.08 Max: 5.63
Current: 1.06
0.53
5.63
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 10.83
MLR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
78% of the 1316 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 6.50 vs. MLR: 10.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
MLR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.3  Med: 12.4 Max: 28.2
Current: 10.83
7.3
28.2
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 4.74
MLR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
56% of the 733 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 6.97 vs. MLR: 4.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
MLR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.5  Med: 5.9 Max: 22.1
Current: 4.74
-13.5
22.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $589.0
EPS (TTM) $ 1.71
Beta0.47
Short Percentage of Float1.16%
52-Week Range $18.93 - 28.85
Shares Outstanding (Mil)11.35
» More Articles for MLR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Charles Brandes Continues to Invests in Pain Therapeutics Sep 06 2016 
Guru Stocks Raising Dividends: PNY, MLR, MAIN, GD, SPLS Mar 11 2012 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 09 2010 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Aug 04 2010 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) May 04 2010 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 09 2009 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Aug 06 2009 
Miller Industries Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) May 07 2009 

More From Other Websites
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : MLR-US: Dividend Analysis : December 05th, 2016 (record date)... Jan 27 2017
ETFs with exposure to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : January 9, 2017 Jan 09 2017
ETFs with exposure to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : December 13, 2016 Dec 13 2016
ETFs with exposure to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : November 30, 2016 Nov 30 2016
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) :MLR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2016 By the Numbers : November... Nov 23 2016
MILLER INDUSTRIES INC /TN/ Financials Nov 17 2016
MILLER INDUSTRIES, INC. ANNOUNCES RETIREMENT OF J. VINCENT MISH AS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND... Nov 10 2016
MILLER INDUSTRIES INC /TN/ Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Change... Nov 09 2016
Miller Industries, Inc. Announces Retirement Of J. Vincent Mish As Chief Financial Officer And... Nov 09 2016
Miller Industries Reports 2016 Third Quarter Results Nov 09 2016
Miller Industries Announces Webcast Nov 03 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : September 15, 2016 Sep 15 2016
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : MLR-US: Dividend Analysis : September 12th, 2016 (record date)... Sep 14 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) : September 1, 2016 Sep 01 2016
Miller Industries, Inc. (Tennessee) :MLR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2016 By the Numbers : August 11,... Aug 11 2016
MILLER INDUSTRIES REPORTS 2016 SECOND QUARTER RESULTS Aug 04 2016
MILLER INDUSTRIES INC /TN/ Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition,... Aug 03 2016
Miller Industries Reports 2016 Second Quarter Results Aug 03 2016
Miller Industries Announces Webcast Jul 28 2016
MILLER INDUSTRIES INC /TN/ Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation... Jun 24 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)