Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt No Debt
NYSE:MN's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
53% of the 1393 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. NYSE:MN: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:MN' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 100.81  Med: No Debt Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity-to-Asset 0.74
NYSE:MN's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
62% of the 1328 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.84 vs. NYSE:MN: 0.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:MN' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.1  Med: 0.7 Max: 0.9
Current: 0.74
-2.1
0.9
Interest Coverage 110.68
NYSE:MN's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
55% of the 1407 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1209.65 vs. NYSE:MN: 110.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:MN' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.88  Med: 397.99 Max: 4981.22
Current: 110.68
1.88
4981.22
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 3.78
Beneish M-Score: -4.22
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 35.06
NYSE:MN's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
57% of the 1344 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 50.11 vs. NYSE:MN: 35.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:MN' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.81  Med: 34.86 Max: 44.99
Current: 35.06
-17.81
44.99
Net Margin % 3.64
NYSE:MN's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
73% of the 1347 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 39.54 vs. NYSE:MN: 3.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:MN' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.23  Med: 2.35 Max: 33.46
Current: 3.64
-8.23
33.46
ROE % 5.22
NYSE:MN's ROE % is ranked lower than
52% of the 1396 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 5.67 vs. NYSE:MN: 5.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:MN' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -314.11  Med: 3.43 Max: 7.43
Current: 5.22
-314.11
7.43
ROA % 4.05
NYSE:MN's ROA % is ranked higher than
55% of the 1424 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.06 vs. NYSE:MN: 4.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:MN' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.98  Med: 3.65 Max: 101.98
Current: 4.05
-21.98
101.98
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 1509.81
NYSE:MN's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
88% of the 813 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 30.40 vs. NYSE:MN: 1509.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:MN' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1692.04  Med: 1909.26 Max: 3745.13
Current: 1509.81
-1692.04
3745.13
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -13.70
NYSE:MN's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
57% of the 1013 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. NYSE:MN: -13.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:MN' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -13.7 Max: 3.8
Current: -13.7
0
3.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 1.20
NYSE:MN's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
72% of the 855 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.30 vs. NYSE:MN: 1.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:MN' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.6 Max: 11.9
Current: 1.2
0
11.9
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 48.30
NYSE:MN's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
94% of the 774 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.80 vs. NYSE:MN: 48.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:MN' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 24.15 Max: 71
Current: 48.3
0
71
» NYSE:MN's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-09 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

MN Guru Trades in Q1 2016

David Rolfe 33,750 sh (New)
Jim Simons 899,100 sh (+7.05%)
John Rogers 1,645,425 sh (+1.81%)
Paul Tudor Jones 14,747 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 636,092 sh (-10.71%)
Richard Snow 257,770 sh (-15.69%)
» More
Q2 2016

MN Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 974,400 sh (+8.38%)
David Rolfe 34,125 sh (+1.11%)
Paul Tudor Jones 14,747 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 636,092 sh (unchged)
Richard Snow Sold Out
John Rogers 1,497,505 sh (-8.99%)
» More
Q3 2016

MN Guru Trades in Q3 2016

David Rolfe 44,250 sh (+29.67%)
Jim Simons 1,067,900 sh (+9.60%)
Chuck Royce 602,092 sh (-5.35%)
John Rogers 1,407,774 sh (-5.99%)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,147 sh (-17.63%)
» More
Q4 2016

MN Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Charles Brandes 10,400 sh (New)
David Rolfe 46,000 sh (+3.95%)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,147 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons 1,063,100 sh (-0.45%)
John Rogers 1,311,025 sh (-6.87%)
Chuck Royce 532,292 sh (-11.59%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MN

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Asset Management » Asset Management    NAICS: 523910    SIC: 6282
Compare:AMEX:CEV, AMEX:NBW, NAS:HCAP, AMEX:GLU, AMEX:FCO, AMEX:BFY, AMEX:VCF, AMEX:AAMC, AMEX:EVY, AMEX:ISL, AMEX:MZA, AMEX:PHF, AMEX:IF, NAS:GSVC, AMEX:NBO, AMEX:CH, NAS:SVVC, OTCPK:RPGLF, AMEX:VFL, AMEX:BCV » details
Traded in other countries:MN0.Germany,
Manning & Napier Inc is an independent investment management firm that provides investment solutions through separately managed accounts, mutual funds and collective investment trust funds.

Manning & Napier Inc was incorporated in June 22, 2011. It is an independent investment management firm that provides a range of investment solutions through separately managed accounts, mutual funds and collective investment trust funds. It offers equity and fixed income portfolios as well as a range of blended asset portfolios, such as life cycle funds, that use a mix of stocks and bonds. The Company serves a diversified client base of high net worth individuals and institutions, including 401(k) plans, pension plans, Taft-Hartley plans, endowments and foundations. It has focused on developing an internal organization of specialists to provide additional consultative services beyond investment management, which helps it build close relationships with its clients through multiple service touch points and a solutions-oriented approach. The Company's operations are based in the United States. It relies on a team-based investment approach and a robust investment process that has resulted in consistent returns over time that are well in excess of market benchmarks. It has a company-wide culture of product innovation that is designed to anticipate the needs of the clients it serves. It has a track record of superior long-term investment returns across its key portfolios relative to its competitors and the relevant benchmarks.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 8.87
MN's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
65% of the 1224 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 13.60 vs. MN: 8.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
MN' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.82  Med: 14.32 Max: 142.23
Current: 8.87
5.82
142.23
PE Ratio without NRI 8.87
MN's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
64% of the 1217 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 13.58 vs. MN: 8.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
MN' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.82  Med: 14.32 Max: 142.23
Current: 8.87
5.82
142.23
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 7.76
MN's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
85% of the 334 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 12.99 vs. MN: 7.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
MN' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.2  Med: 10.3 Max: 50.38
Current: 7.76
2.2
50.38
PB Ratio 0.50
MN's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
90% of the 1435 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. MN: 0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
MN' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 1.08 Max: 1.63
Current: 0.5
0.5
1.63
PS Ratio 0.30
MN's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
97% of the 1205 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 6.73 vs. MN: 0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
MN' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 0.53 Max: 1.07
Current: 0.3
0.3
1.07
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 0.87
MN's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
99% of the 354 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 14.71 vs. MN: 0.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
MN' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.25 Max: 2.42
Current: 0.87
0.76
2.42
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 0.87
MN's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
99% of the 741 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 16.02 vs. MN: 0.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
MN' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.75  Med: 1.23 Max: 2.38
Current: 0.87
0.75
2.38
EV-to-EBIT -0.92
MN's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 1029 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 12.05 vs. MN: -0.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MN' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1  Med: -0.1 Max: 3.6
Current: -0.92
-1
3.6
EV-to-EBITDA -0.89
MN's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 1057 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 11.10 vs. MN: -0.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MN' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1  Med: -0.1 Max: 3.5
Current: -0.89
-1
3.5
Current Ratio 3.49
MN's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
52% of the 851 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.83 vs. MN: 3.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MN' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.56  Med: 3.12 Max: 3.49
Current: 3.49
1.56
3.49
Quick Ratio 3.49
MN's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 851 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.68 vs. MN: 3.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MN' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.56  Med: 3.12 Max: 3.49
Current: 3.49
1.56
3.49
Days Sales Outstanding 31.84
MN's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
57% of the 456 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 43.58 vs. MN: 31.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MN' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 27.86  Med: 37.77 Max: 47.96
Current: 31.84
27.86
47.96

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 11.64
MN's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
94% of the 1493 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.01 vs. MN: 11.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
MN' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.11  Med: 4.27 Max: 11.85
Current: 11.64
1.11
11.85
Dividend Payout Ratio 1.03
MN's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
71% of the 887 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.57 vs. MN: 1.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
MN' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.71  Med: 1.03 Max: 3.37
Current: 1.03
0.71
3.37
Forward Dividend Yield % 10.28
MN's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
93% of the 1428 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.36 vs. MN: 10.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 11.64
MN's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
87% of the 1724 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.64 vs. MN: 11.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
MN' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.11  Med: 4.27 Max: 11.85
Current: 11.64
1.11
11.85
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -3.20
MN's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
58% of the 874 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: -1.30 vs. MN: -3.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MN' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.2  Med: -0.3 Max: 0
Current: -3.2
-3.2
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Cash 1.02
MN's Price-to-Net-Cash is ranked higher than
79% of the 551 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.68 vs. MN: 1.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Cash only.
MN' s Price-to-Net-Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.01  Med: 2.5 Max: 3.85
Current: 1.02
1.01
3.85
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 0.77
MN's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked higher than
89% of the 584 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.02 vs. MN: 0.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
MN' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.75  Med: 1.59 Max: 2.06
Current: 0.77
0.75
2.06
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.52
MN's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
91% of the 1368 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.01 vs. MN: 0.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
MN' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.51  Med: 1.05 Max: 1.43
Current: 0.52
0.51
1.43
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.05
MN's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
99% of the 477 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. MN: 0.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
MN' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.07 Max: 0.07
Current: 0.05
0.05
0.07
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.58
MN's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
87% of the 843 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. MN: 0.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
MN' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.57  Med: 0.93 Max: 1.8
Current: 0.58
0.57
1.8
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.45
MN's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
87% of the 970 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.82 vs. MN: 0.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
MN' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 1.02 Max: 2.43
Current: 0.45
0.45
2.43
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -108.48
MN's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
97% of the 1447 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.88 vs. MN: -108.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
MN' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -109.06  Med: 139 Max: 24286.9
Current: -108.48
-109.06
24286.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $254.5
EPS (TTM) $ 0.62
Beta1.28
Short Percentage of Float14.23%
52-Week Range $5.20 - 10.34
Shares Outstanding (Mil)14.98
» More Articles for MN

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
A Strange and Beautiful Find: EMT and the Platypus Apr 17 2015 
John Rogers Increases His Position in MN Feb 12 2015 
Finding Value in an Investment Management Firm Oct 14 2014 
Weekly CFO Buys Highlight: TSON, PRTS, FXCM, AMRI, MN Dec 05 2011 

More From Other Websites
Manning & Napier, Inc. :MN-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : March 22, 2017 Mar 22 2017
MANNING & NAPIER, INC. Financials Mar 22 2017
MANNING & NAPIER, INC. Files SEC form 10-K, Annual Report Mar 16 2017
Manning & Napier, Inc. Reports February 28, 2017 Assets Under Management Mar 10 2017
MANNING & NAPIER, INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits Mar 09 2017
Manning & Napier, Inc. Announces Quarterly Dividend Mar 09 2017
Manning & Napier, Inc. : MN-US: Dividend Analysis : January 13th, 2017 (record date) : By the... Mar 03 2017
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Purcell Julie & Lefkowitz LLP Is Investigating Manning & Napier, Inc. for... Feb 21 2017
Manning & Napier, Inc. :MN-US: Earnings Analysis: 2016 By the Numbers : February 14, 2017 Feb 14 2017
Manning & Napier, Inc. Reports January 31, 2017 Assets Under Management Feb 10 2017
Manning & Napier posts 4Q profit Feb 09 2017
Manning & Napier posts 4Q profit Feb 09 2017
MANNING & NAPIER, INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial... Feb 09 2017
Manning & Napier, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Earnings Results Feb 09 2017
Q4 2016 Manning & Napier Inc Earnings Release - After Market Close Feb 09 2017
Manning & Napier February 2017 Perspective Feb 08 2017
Manning & Napier Slashes SLM Stake as Market Price Soars Feb 02 2017
Manning & Napier 4th Quarter International Perspective Jan 25 2017
Tesco Faces Fresh Investor Suit Over 2014 Scandal Jan 25 2017
Tesco faces new legal action over accounting scandal Jan 24 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)