Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt No Debt
NYSE:MN's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
62% of the 1542 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. NYSE:MN: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
NYSE:MN' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 158.83  Med: No Debt Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity to Asset 0.71
NYSE:MN's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
62% of the 1418 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.84 vs. NYSE:MN: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
NYSE:MN' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.79  Med: 0.72 Max: 0.9
Current: 0.71
-2.79
0.9
Interest Coverage 209.47
NYSE:MN's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
54% of the 1339 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 823.17 vs. NYSE:MN: 209.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:MN' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.88  Med: 1306.16 Max: 4981.22
Current: 209.47
1.88
4981.22
F-Score: 6
Z-Score: 3.91
M-Score: -4.32
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 34.03
NYSE:MN's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
57% of the 1435 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 46.93 vs. NYSE:MN: 34.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
NYSE:MN' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.81  Med: 33.17 Max: 44.99
Current: 34.03
-17.81
44.99
Net-margin (%) 3.69
NYSE:MN's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
73% of the 1438 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 37.02 vs. NYSE:MN: 3.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
NYSE:MN' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.23  Med: 1.52 Max: 33.46
Current: 3.69
-8.23
33.46
ROE (%) 5.62
NYSE:MN's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
55% of the 1543 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.95 vs. NYSE:MN: 5.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
NYSE:MN' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -314.11  Med: 1.59 Max: 7.43
Current: 5.62
-314.11
7.43
ROA (%) 4.47
NYSE:MN's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 1574 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.08 vs. NYSE:MN: 4.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
NYSE:MN' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.98  Med: 2.45 Max: 101.98
Current: 4.47
-21.98
101.98
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 1528.88
NYSE:MN's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 938 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 35.75 vs. NYSE:MN: 1528.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
NYSE:MN' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1692.04  Med: 2045.87 Max: 3745.13
Current: 1528.88
-1692.04
3745.13
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -2.00
NYSE:MN's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
55% of the 1006 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. NYSE:MN: -2.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NYSE:MN' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -1 Max: 4.5
Current: -2
0
4.5
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 11.90
NYSE:MN's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
65% of the 846 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: -0.10 vs. NYSE:MN: 11.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NYSE:MN' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 11.9
Current: 11.9
0
11.9
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 71.00
NYSE:MN's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
92% of the 756 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.20 vs. NYSE:MN: 71.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NYSE:MN' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 71
Current: 71
0
71
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Manning & Napier Inc $NYSE:MN.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:MN's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2015

MN Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons 839,900 sh (+11.47%)
Richard Snow 305,726 sh (+10.93%)
Chuck Royce 712,392 sh (+6.97%)
John Rogers 1,616,120 sh (-0.19%)
Paul Tudor Jones 14,747 sh (-3.91%)
» More
Q1 2016

MN Guru Trades in Q1 2016

David Rolfe 33,750 sh (New)
Jim Simons 899,100 sh (+7.05%)
John Rogers 1,645,425 sh (+1.81%)
Paul Tudor Jones 14,747 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 636,092 sh (-10.71%)
Richard Snow 257,770 sh (-15.69%)
» More
Q2 2016

MN Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 974,400 sh (+8.38%)
David Rolfe 34,125 sh (+1.11%)
Paul Tudor Jones 14,747 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 636,092 sh (unchged)
Richard Snow Sold Out
John Rogers 1,497,505 sh (-8.99%)
» More
Q3 2016

MN Guru Trades in Q3 2016

David Rolfe 44,250 sh (+29.67%)
Jim Simons 1,067,900 sh (+9.60%)
Chuck Royce 602,092 sh (-5.35%)
John Rogers 1,407,774 sh (-5.99%)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,147 sh (-17.63%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MN

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Asset Management » Asset Management    NAICS: 523910    SIC: 6282
Compare:AMEX:ERH, AMEX:ECF, NYSE:SAR, AMEX:CRF, AMEX:BCV, NAS:GSVC, AMEX:ABE, OTCPK:UBAAF, AMEX:IAF, AMEX:AAMC, AMEX:EIV, NAS:BANX, AMEX:GLV, NAS:ACSF, NAS:HRZN, AMEX:PHF, NAS:CMFN, NYSE:NKG, AMEX:HNW, AMEX:CEV » details
Traded in other countries:MN0.Germany,
Manning & Napier Inc is an independent investment management firm that provides investment solutions through separately managed accounts, mutual funds and collective investment trust funds.

Manning & Napier Inc was incorporated in June 22, 2011. It is an independent investment management firm that provides a range of investment solutions through separately managed accounts, mutual funds and collective investment trust funds. It offers equity and fixed income portfolios as well as a range of blended asset portfolios, such as life cycle funds, that use a mix of stocks and bonds. The Company serves a diversified client base of high net worth individuals and institutions, including 401(k) plans, pension plans, Taft-Hartley plans, endowments and foundations. It has focused on developing an internal organization of specialists to provide additional consultative services beyond investment management, which helps it build close relationships with its clients through multiple service touch points and a solutions-oriented approach. The Company's operations are based in the United States. It relies on a team-based investment approach and a robust investment process that has resulted in consistent returns over time that are well in excess of market benchmarks. It has a company-wide culture of product innovation that is designed to anticipate the needs of the clients it serves. It has a track record of superior long-term investment returns across its key portfolios relative to its competitors and the relevant benchmarks.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 10.90
MN's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
60% of the 1065 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 14.07 vs. MN: 10.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
MN' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.82  Med: 17.58 Max: 142.23
Current: 10.9
5.82
142.23
PE(NRI) 10.90
MN's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
61% of the 1077 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 14.42 vs. MN: 10.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
MN' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.82  Med: 17.58 Max: 142.23
Current: 10.9
5.82
142.23
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 5.94
MN's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked higher than
77% of the 342 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 12.83 vs. MN: 5.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
MN' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.2  Med: 10.09 Max: 50.38
Current: 5.94
2.2
50.38
P/B 0.66
MN's P/B is ranked higher than
84% of the 1522 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. MN: 0.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
MN' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 1.1 Max: 1.63
Current: 0.66
0.5
1.63
P/S 0.37
MN's P/S is ranked higher than
96% of the 1196 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 6.93 vs. MN: 0.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
MN' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 0.54 Max: 1.07
Current: 0.37
0.29
1.07
PFCF 1.03
MN's PFCF is ranked higher than
96% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 16.45 vs. MN: 1.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
MN' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.25 Max: 2.42
Current: 1.03
0.76
2.42
POCF 1.02
MN's POCF is ranked higher than
97% of the 746 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 16.65 vs. MN: 1.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
MN' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.75  Med: 1.23 Max: 2.38
Current: 1.02
0.75
2.38
Current Ratio 3.47
MN's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
54% of the 1051 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.34 vs. MN: 3.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MN' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.51  Med: 3.21 Max: 4.35
Current: 3.47
1.51
4.35
Quick Ratio 3.47
MN's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 1051 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.24 vs. MN: 3.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MN' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.51  Med: 3.21 Max: 4.35
Current: 3.47
1.51
4.35
Days Sales Outstanding 31.66
MN's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
60% of the 486 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 43.93 vs. MN: 31.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MN' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 27.03  Med: 39.41 Max: 47.96
Current: 31.66
27.03
47.96

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 8.77
MN's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
87% of the 1484 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.19 vs. MN: 8.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
MN' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.11  Med: 4.16 Max: 11.27
Current: 8.77
1.11
11.27
Dividend Payout 0.96
MN's Dividend Payout is ranked lower than
67% of the 842 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. MN: 0.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
MN' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.71  Med: 1.81 Max: 3.37
Current: 0.96
0.71
3.37
Dividend Growth (3y) 10.10
MN's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
70% of the 642 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.90 vs. MN: 10.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
MN' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 10.1
Current: 10.1
0
10.1
Forward Dividend Yield 8.77
MN's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
84% of the 1384 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.58 vs. MN: 8.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 8.77
MN's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
80% of the 1715 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.88 vs. MN: 8.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
MN' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.11  Med: 4.16 Max: 11.27
Current: 8.77
1.11
11.27
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -2.80
MN's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 867 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: -1.40 vs. MN: -2.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MN' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.8  Med: -0.15 Max: 0
Current: -2.8
-2.8
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Cash 1.47
MN's Price/Net Cash is ranked higher than
70% of the 563 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.66 vs. MN: 1.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Cash only.
MN' s Price/Net Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.33  Med: 2.86 Max: 4.2
Current: 1.47
1.33
4.2
Price/Net Current Asset Value 1.07
MN's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked higher than
72% of the 610 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.94 vs. MN: 1.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
MN' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 1.66 Max: 2.13
Current: 1.07
0.93
2.13
Price/Tangible Book 0.68
MN's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
84% of the 1458 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. MN: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
MN' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.65  Med: 1.11 Max: 1.45
Current: 0.68
0.65
1.45
Price/Projected FCF 0.07
MN's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
99% of the 487 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. MN: 0.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
MN' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.08 Max: 0.09
Current: 0.07
0.07
0.09
Price/Median PS Value 0.69
MN's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
79% of the 789 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. MN: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
MN' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 1.05 Max: 1.77
Current: 0.69
0.66
1.77
Price/Graham Number 0.57
MN's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
73% of the 953 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.86 vs. MN: 0.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
MN' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 1.02 Max: 2.78
Current: 0.57
0.41
2.78
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -178.60
MN's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
97% of the 1455 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.40 vs. MN: -178.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
MN' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -178.6  Med: 139 Max: 24286.9
Current: -178.6
-178.6
24286.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $275.2
EPS (TTM) $ 0.67
Beta1.26
Short Percentage of Float13.61%
52-Week Range $5.60 - 10.34
Shares Outstanding (Mil)15.00
» More Articles for NYSE:MN

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
A Strange and Beautiful Find: EMT and the Platypus Apr 17 2015 
John Rogers Increases His Position in MN Feb 12 2015 
Finding Value in an Investment Management Firm Oct 14 2014 
Weekly CFO Buys Highlight: TSON, PRTS, FXCM, AMRI, MN Dec 05 2011 

More From Other Websites
Manning & Napier, Inc. to Report Fourth Quarter 2016 Results; Announces December 31, 2016 Assets... Jan 12 2017
MANNING & NAPIER, INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers Jan 11 2017
Manning & Napier: January 2017 Perspective Jan 10 2017
MANNING & NAPIER, INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement Jan 09 2017
Financials and Industrials Show Strong Returns Post-Election - Manning & Napier Jan 09 2017
Manning & Napier (MN) in Focus: Stock Moves 5.2% Higher Dec 19 2016
Manning & Napier, Inc. Reports November 30, 2016 Assets Under Management Dec 12 2016
Do Hedge Funds Love Manning and Napier Inc (MN)? Dec 11 2016
MANNING & NAPIER, INC. Financials Nov 16 2016
Manning & Napier Launches “Evolutionary Fiduciary” Campaign Nov 15 2016
Manning & Napier Launches "Evolutionary Fiduciary" Campaign Nov 15 2016
Manning & Napier, Inc. Reports October 31, 2016 Assets Under Management Nov 10 2016
MANNING & NAPIER, INC. Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Nov 07 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Manning & Napier, Inc. : October 31, 2016 Oct 31 2016
Manning & Napier, Inc. :MN-US: Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2016 By the Numbers : October 28, 2016 Oct 28 2016
Manning & Napier Advisors downgraded by Keefe Bruyette Oct 27 2016
Edited Transcript of MN earnings conference call or presentation 26-Oct-16 9:00pm GMT Oct 26 2016
Manning & Napier, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2016 Earnings Results Oct 26 2016
Manning & Napier, Inc. Announces Quarterly Dividend Oct 26 2016
MANNING & NAPIER, INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits Oct 26 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)