Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt No Debt
MNST's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
86% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. MNST: No Debt )
MNST' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.01   Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt

Equity to Asset 0.69
MNST's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
83% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. MNST: 0.69 )
MNST' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.46   Max: 0.8
Current: 0.69

0.46
0.8
Interest Coverage No Debt
MNST's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
87% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 21.17 vs. MNST: No Debt )
MNST' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 1.5   Max: 9999.99
Current: No Debt

1.5
9999.99
F-Score: 7
Z-Score: 18.47
M-Score: -2.62
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 25.50
MNST's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
97% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 8.23 vs. MNST: 25.50 )
MNST' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -3.53   Max: 29.65
Current: 25.5

-3.53
29.65
Net-margin (%) 15.08
MNST's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
94% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 5.85 vs. MNST: 15.08 )
MNST' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -3.82   Max: 18.26
Current: 15.08

-3.82
18.26
ROE (%) 34.13
MNST's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
96% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 10.92 vs. MNST: 34.13 )
MNST' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -15.48   Max: 52.77
Current: 34.13

-15.48
52.77
ROA (%) 23.84
MNST's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
97% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 5.63 vs. MNST: 23.84 )
MNST' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -7.43   Max: 38.3
Current: 23.84

-7.43
38.3
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 167.73
MNST's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
98% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 17.39 vs. MNST: 167.73 )
MNST' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -46.15   Max: 271.7
Current: 167.73

-46.15
271.7
Revenue Growth (%) 22.70
MNST's Revenue Growth (%) is ranked higher than
96% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 5.80 vs. MNST: 22.70 )
MNST' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (%) Range
Min: 8.6   Max: 68.8
Current: 22.7

8.6
68.8
EBITDA Growth (%) 21.20
MNST's EBITDA Growth (%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 90 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 5.60 vs. MNST: 21.20 )
MNST' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (%) Range
Min: 0   Max: 139.6
Current: 21.2

0
139.6
EPS Growth (%) 19.60
MNST's EPS Growth (%) is ranked higher than
84% of the 85 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. MNST: 19.60 )
MNST' s 10-Year EPS Growth (%) Range
Min: -12.6   Max: 155.4
Current: 19.6

-12.6
155.4
» MNST's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2013

MNST Guru Trades in Q3 2013

Murray Stahl 6,049 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 11,900 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 6,846 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 184,666 sh (New)
David Rolfe 1,741,395 sh (+13.71%)
Jeff Auxier 15,600 sh (unchged)
Jean-Marie Eveillard 15,000 sh (unchged)
Pioneer Investments 95,166 sh (-0.98%)
Jeremy Grantham 221,137 sh (-12.35%)
Jim Simons 42,400 sh (-18.3%)
» More
Q4 2013

MNST Guru Trades in Q4 2013

George Soros 377,415 sh (New)
Mario Cibelli 30,000 sh (New)
Murray Stahl 7,959 sh (+31.58%)
Pioneer Investments 117,985 sh (+23.98%)
David Rolfe 1,871,588 sh (+7.48%)
Jean-Marie Eveillard 15,000 sh (unchged)
Jeff Auxier 15,600 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham 200,969 sh (-9.12%)
Steven Cohen 2,650 sh (-98.56%)
» More
Q1 2014

MNST Guru Trades in Q1 2014

Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 143,750 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 6,811 sh (New)
Jim Simons 65,036 sh (New)
Louis Moore Bacon 5,928 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 106,512 sh (+3919.32%)
George Soros 1,463,415 sh (+287.75%)
Murray Stahl 11,508 sh (+44.59%)
Pioneer Investments 169,064 sh (+43.29%)
Mario Cibelli 30,000 sh (unchged)
Jean-Marie Eveillard 15,000 sh (unchged)
David Rolfe Sold Out
Jeff Auxier 13,100 sh (-16.03%)
Jeremy Grantham 95,697 sh (-52.38%)
» More
Q2 2014

MNST Guru Trades in Q2 2014

Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 178,520 sh (+24.19%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MNST

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
George Soros 2014-03-31 Add 287.75%0.74%$66.46 - $74.79 $ 66.67-5%1463415
Mario Cibelli 2013-12-31 New Buy1.1%$51.65 - $67.8 $ 66.6713%30000
George Soros 2013-12-31 New Buy0.22%$51.65 - $67.8 $ 66.6713%377415
Joel Greenblatt 2013-12-31 Sold Out 0.01%$51.65 - $67.8 $ 66.6713%0
Ray Dalio 2013-12-31 Sold Out 0.01%$51.65 - $67.8 $ 66.6713%0
Ray Dalio 2013-09-30 New Buy0.01%$53.07 - $64.65 $ 66.6712%11900
Joel Greenblatt 2013-09-30 New Buy0.01%$53.07 - $64.65 $ 66.6712%6846
John Burbank 2013-06-30 Sold Out 0.1%$47.66 - $62.2 $ 66.6718%0
Joel Greenblatt 2013-06-30 Sold Out 0.02%$47.66 - $62.2 $ 66.6718%0
John Burbank 2013-03-31 Reduce -90.34%1.08%$46.19 - $54.23 $ 66.6736%55000
Joel Greenblatt 2013-03-31 New Buy0.02%$46.19 - $54.23 $ 66.6736%10071
John Burbank 2012-12-31 Add 2374.89%1.15%$41.08 - $58.42 $ 66.6732%569225
Joel Greenblatt 2012-12-31 Sold Out 0.05%$41.08 - $58.42 $ 66.6732%0
John Burbank 2012-09-30 New Buy0.06%$50.78 - $74.88 $ 66.676%23000
Joel Greenblatt 2012-09-30 New Buy0.05%$50.78 - $74.88 $ 66.676%14560
John Burbank 2012-06-30 Sold Out 0.08%$61.8 - $78.06 $ 66.67-4%0
Jean-Marie Eveillard 2012-06-30 Reduce -25%$61.8 - $78.06 $ 66.67-4%15000
Jean-Marie Eveillard 2012-03-31 Reduce -50%$46.2 - $62.91 $ 66.6729%20000
Jean-Marie Eveillard 2011-12-31 Add 100%$19.94 - $24.29 $ 66.67193%10000
Jean-Marie Eveillard 2011-06-30 Reduce -84%0.02%$30.5 - $40.12 $ 66.6795%10000
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Monster Beverage Corp

David Rolfe Comments on Monster Beverage - Oct 22, 2013

Monster Beverage (MNST)

Monster Beverage detracted from performance as revenue growth decelerated in the face of negative press related to the safety profile of energy drinks. Despite this transient headwind, the brand continues to take share, profitably, from traditional carbonated soft drinks. We continue to expect the Company's growth profile, over a multi-year period, will eclipse double-digits, despite periodic negative press. Energy drinks continue to be a highly disruptive offering in the beverage industry, driven by a generational shift in preference for caffeinated products. While the level of caffeine in the typical Monster Energy drink is higher than most traditional carbonated soft drinks, it has half as much (per ounce) than most popular coffee house offerings. We believe this relatively new value proposition should position Monster to continue taking share from traditional beverage incumbents.

From David Rolfe's Wedgewood Partners third quarter 2013 commentary.


Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

David Rolfe of Wedgewood Partners Comments on Monster Beverage Corp - Jan 29, 2013

We also added Monster Beverage Corp. (MNST) to the Fund during the quarter. For over 20 years, prior to a name change in January 2012, the Company was known as Hansen Natural Corp, with roots tracing back to the 1930's. Currently, Monster Beverage primarily manufactures beverages that compete in the alternative beverage industry, with a particular focus on the energy drink category.

Branding and innovation are both extremely important elements to Monster's consistently superior ROIC generation, relative to a competitive field that includes offerings from such branding masters as Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. Monster's early entrance into the US energy drink market in the mid 1990's coincided with its rival Red Bull's entrance. The latter was the first energy drink to reach critical mass on an international scale but, importantly, implanted the idea of beverage functionality into the minds of consumers around the world. This functionality continues to be a defining element for this category and typically includes twice as much caffeine per ounce relative to conventional carbonated soft drinks (CSDs), in addition to supplements such as taurine and B-group vitamins. This energy boost continues to command a handsome premium on a per-ounce basis, relative to CSDs, as an 8.3 ounce can of Red Bull retails for around the equivalent of 35 cents per ounce, while Monster Energy is about half of that and CSDs closer to about 5 cents per ounce.

Now, we recognize that competing on pricing alone is a very poor long-term strategy, however, Monster Energy's large discount to Red Bull dates back, effectively, to the Brand's inception, circa 1997, when Monster's management recognized the enormous pricing power that Red Bull exhibited relative to CSDs. However, instead of offering a similar tall and slim 8.3 ounce form factor, Monster chose to offer a much larger and more ostentatious 16 ounce can, but for the same price as an 8.3 ounce Red Bull - effectively 50% cheaper. Monster Energy's new form-factor and discount was instrumental for driving visibility as the Brand quickly gained critical mass at the expense of (and passive abetment from) a more established rival. Over the past 10 years, Monster Beverage has sold more than 8 billion cans of Monster Energy, at the same time, several rivals, that include PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, have mimicked Monster's larger form factor and pricing strategy, but with unit sale results that are a small fraction.

Monster's form-factor and pricing strategy were pioneering elements to the energy drink category, however, the Company continues to meticulously curate the Monster Energy brand by exclusively focusing on unconventional marketing mediums and innovative offerings. For instance, through the first 11 months of 2012, new products drove almost one-third of Monster's US unit growth. The Company recently launched a noncarbonated, low-carb, energy drink line, Monster Rehab, that includes tea-based and noncitrus flavors, and has quickly become one of the Company's most successful products, we estimate generating almost 10% of US gross revenues during 2011, after launching in February of the same year. Further, Monster's brand awareness is cultivated through non-traditional mediums, with, we estimate, less that 10% of the Company's marketing budget dedicated to conventional mediums such as radio, television, newspaper and online. Most of the Company's marketing focus is on audiences of unconventional and emerging sports such as motocross, BMX racing, snowboarding, skiing, Formula 1 and Professional Bull Riders. This is in contrast to many of Monster's rivals that typically apply more conventional methods to their marketing efforts.

We think that there is ample room for growth as the Company's sales represent less than 25% of the US energy drink market, yet Monster recently became the market share leader in the US, in terms of units sold. Outside of the US, there is a very large, untapped market where in many countries. Currently, about 20% of Monster's gross sales are generated outside of the US. Despite having populated international countries for an average of about 3 years, Monster has already generated unit sales that are a quarter of Red Bull's, while Red Bull has over 20 years experience in international markets. We think Monster's rapid market share take is a testament to the international portability of the Brand and the market's ability and willingness to support two large players, many years into the future.

From Wedgewood Partners' fourth quarter letter.

Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Monster Beverage Corp

David Rolfe Comments on Monster Beverage
Monster Beverage (MNST) Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 31.30
MNST's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
68% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 27.90 vs. MNST: 31.30 )
MNST' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 11.79   Max: 60.05
Current: 31.3

11.79
60.05
P/B 10.00
MNST's P/B is ranked higher than
50% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.02 vs. MNST: 10.00 )
MNST' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 1.79   Max: 27.31
Current: 10

1.79
27.31
P/S 5.00
MNST's P/S is ranked higher than
52% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.42 vs. MNST: 5.00 )
MNST' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.59   Max: 11.03
Current: 5

0.59
11.03
PFCF 30.70
MNST's PFCF is ranked higher than
77% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 97.80 vs. MNST: 30.70 )
MNST' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 12   Max: 164.7
Current: 30.7

12
164.7
EV-to-EBIT 16.53
MNST's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
79% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 18.42 vs. MNST: 16.53 )
MNST' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 6.7   Max: 36.6
Current: 16.53

6.7
36.6
PEG 1.60
MNST's PEG is ranked higher than
86% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 5.26 vs. MNST: 1.60 )
MNST' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.13   Max: 39.42
Current: 1.6

0.13
39.42
Shiller P/E 44.90
MNST's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
80% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 188.62 vs. MNST: 44.90 )
MNST' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 11.93   Max: 208.53
Current: 44.9

11.93
208.53
Current Ratio 3.56
MNST's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
92% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.49 vs. MNST: 3.56 )
MNST' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.63   Max: 6.99
Current: 3.56

0.63
6.99
Quick Ratio 3.03
MNST's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
93% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. MNST: 3.03 )
MNST' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.2   Max: 5.78
Current: 3.03

0.2
5.78

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Cash 42.70
MNST's Price/Net Cash is ranked higher than
92% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. MNST: 42.70 )
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Net Cash Range
Min: 13.47   Max: 180.44
Current: 42.7

13.47
180.44
Price/Net Current Asset Value 17.90
MNST's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked higher than
90% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. MNST: 17.90 )
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Net Current Asset Value Range
Min: 9.32   Max: 87.4
Current: 17.9

9.32
87.4
Price/Tangible Book 10.70
MNST's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
57% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.52 vs. MNST: 10.70 )
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 3.4   Max: 28.9
Current: 10.7

3.4
28.9
Price/DCF (Projected) 2.60
MNST's Price/DCF (Projected) is ranked higher than
81% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 11.09 vs. MNST: 2.60 )
MNST' s 10-Year Price/DCF (Projected) Range
Min: 0.88   Max: 11.28
Current: 2.6

0.88
11.28
Price/Median PS Value 1.20
MNST's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
76% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. MNST: 1.20 )
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.03   Max: 2.3
Current: 1.2

0.03
2.3
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 1.30
MNST's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked higher than
93% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. MNST: 1.30 )
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.6   Max: 3.43
Current: 1.3

0.6
3.43
Price/Graham Number 3.80
MNST's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
67% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 2.86 vs. MNST: 3.80 )
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 1.3   Max: 7.28
Current: 3.8

1.3
7.28
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) 6.00
MNST's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) is ranked higher than
72% of the 101 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 6.10 vs. MNST: 6.00 )
MNST' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) Range
Min: 2.7   Max: 14.9
Current: 6

2.7
14.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) 25.83
MNST's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) is ranked higher than
92% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 8.63 vs. MNST: 25.83 )
MNST' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) Range
Min: -3.3   Max: 135.4
Current: 25.83

-3.3
135.4

Business Description

Industry: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic » Beverages - Soft Drinks
Compare:KO, PEP, KOF, SODA, CCLAY » details
Traded in other countries:HNA.Germany
Monster Beverage Corp was formerly known as Hansen Natural Corporation was incorporated in Delaware on April 25, 1990. The Company develops, markets, sells and distributes 'alternative' beverage category natural sodas, fruit juices, juice blends, juice drinks, energy drinks and energy sports drinks, fruit juice smoothies and 'functional' drinks, non-carbonated ready-to-drink iced teas, children's multi-vitamin juice drinks, Junior Juice juices, Junior Juice Water and flavored sparkling beverages under the Hansen's brand name. It has two reportable segments, namely Direct Store Delivery ("DSD"), whose products comprise energy drinks, and Warehouse, whose principal products comprise juice-based and soda beverages. The DSD segment develops, markets and sells products mainly through an exclusive distributor network, whereas the Warehouse segment develops, markets and sells products primarily directly to retailers. During 2012, the company continued to expand its existing product lines and flavors and further develop its distribution markets. The Company packages its products in a variety of different package types and sizes including, but not limited to, aluminum cans, sleek aluminum cans, glass bottles, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic bottles, high density polyethylene plastic bottles, aseptic boxes and stick packs. It purchases concentrates, sweeteners, juices, flavors, dietary ingredients, cans, bottles, aseptic boxes, caps, labels, trays, boxes and other ingredients for its beverage products from its suppliers, which are delivered to various third party bottlers and co-packers. Its entire beverage products are manufactured by various third party bottlers and co-packers situated throughout the United States and abroad, under separate arrangements with each party. The main raw materials used in the manufacturing of its products are aluminum cans, PET plastic and glass bottles as well as flavors, juice concentrates, sugar, sucralose, milk, cream, dietary ingredients and other packaging materials, the costs of which are subject to fluctuations. Its customers are mainly full service beverage distributors, retail grocery and specialty chains, wholesalers, club stores, drug chains, mass merchandisers, convenience chains, health food distributors, food service customers and the military. The Company's products compete with a range of drinks produced by a relatively large number of companies, many of which have substantially greater financial, marketing and distribution resources than it does. The production, distribution and sale in the United States of many of its products are subject to various U.S. federal and state regulations.
» More Articles for MNST

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Monster Beverages May Energize Your Portfolio Jul 07 2014 
Energy Drink Companies Are a Solid Investment Jun 24 2014 
Jim Simons’ Take on the Soft Drink Industry Nov 12 2013 
David Rolfe Comments on Monster Beverage Oct 22 2013 
Wedgewood Partners 3rd Quarter 2013 Review - David Rolfe Oct 22 2013 
Trying to Beat the Market Is a Fool’s Errand Oct 17 2013 
Weekly Top Insider Sells Jun 17 2013 
Weekly Top Insider Sells Jun 11 2013 
Large Insider Sells Reported in Guru Favorites Jun 03 2013 
Weekly Top Insider Sells--GGP, MNST, ISRG Mar 10 2013 


More From Other Websites
A Monster Of A Growth Stock Jul 24 2014
NutraFuels Targets Rapidly Growing Fragmented Nutraceutical Spray Market Jul 23 2014
Monster Beverage Shares Tumble on Downgrade, Lawsuit News Jul 22 2014
Monster Beverage Statement on Jason Hamric Suit Jul 21 2014
[video] End game for Monster Beverage Jul 21 2014
Monster says 'no credible evidence' that Hamric consumed beverage Jul 21 2014
Monster Beverage Statement on Jason Hamric Suit Jul 21 2014
Roof Leaker To Watch: Monster Beverage (MNST) Jul 21 2014
How Will Monster Beverage (MNST) Stock React To This Ratings Downgrade? Jul 21 2014
Monster Beverage downgraded at Morgan Stanley Jul 21 2014
Chart Says Takeover Candidate Is A Buy For 14% Upside Jul 16 2014
Jim Cramer's Top Stock Picks: DF MNST BDSI Jul 11 2014
Cramer investigates Monster opportunity Jul 10 2014
[video] Cramer's 'Monster' takeover speculation Jul 10 2014
Monster Beverage Strengthens International Presence Jul 02 2014
Sruvey results disappointing for Monster Beverage, says Longbow Jul 01 2014
Eminence Capital disposes position in Monster Beverage Jun 27 2014

Personalized Checklist








Within your circle of competence?
Macro economic environment favorable?
High quality business?
Enough margin of safety with stocks?
Gurus are buying?
Insiders are buying?
Management capable and shareholder friendly?
Catalyst for stock price to appreciate?
Your level of confidence with the research?

Add Notes, Comments or Ask Questions

User Comments

No comment yet

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK
Email Hide