Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt No Debt
MNST's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
97% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. MNST: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
MNST' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 118.22 Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity to Asset 0.83
MNST's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
94% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 0.55 vs. MNST: 0.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
MNST' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 0.68 Max: 0.84
Current: 0.83
0.49
0.84
Interest Coverage No Debt
MNST's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
97% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 21.43 vs. MNST: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
MNST' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1343.42  Med: 10000.00 Max: 9999.99
Current: No Debt
1343.42
9999.99
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 19.29
M-Score: -0.86
WACC vs ROIC
11.85%
53.55%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 31.99
MNST's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
98% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 7.17 vs. MNST: 31.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
MNST' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.82  Med: 26.70 Max: 30.33
Current: 31.99
15.82
30.33
Net-margin (%) 19.88
MNST's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
96% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.50 vs. MNST: 19.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
MNST' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.45  Med: 16.51 Max: 19.6
Current: 19.88
10.45
19.6
ROE (%) 19.21
MNST's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
73% of the 97 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 8.68 vs. MNST: 19.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
MNST' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 25.17  Med: 41.13 Max: 68.2
Current: 19.21
25.17
68.2
ROA (%) 15.43
MNST's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 101 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.23 vs. MNST: 15.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
MNST' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.54  Med: 27.88 Max: 51.05
Current: 15.43
16.54
51.05
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 201.12
MNST's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
97% of the 101 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 16.30 vs. MNST: 201.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
MNST' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 145.85  Med: 229.50 Max: 337.55
Current: 201.12
145.85
337.55
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 15.70
MNST's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
85% of the 78 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.50 vs. MNST: 15.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MNST' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.2  Med: 22.10 Max: 68.8
Current: 15.7
9.2
68.8
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 20.50
MNST's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. MNST: 20.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MNST' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.2  Med: 25.95 Max: 139.6
Current: 20.5
-7.2
139.6
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 21.80
MNST's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
77% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. MNST: 21.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MNST' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.6  Med: 26.10 Max: 161.8
Current: 21.8
-12.6
161.8
» MNST's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2015

MNST Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Caxton Associates 42,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 343,600 sh (+1.39%)
Joel Greenblatt 319,672 sh (+0.82%)
First Eagle Investment 15,000 sh (unchged)
Mario Cibelli Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc Sold Out
Pioneer Investments 108,178 sh (-0.57%)
Jeff Auxier 12,100 sh (-3.97%)
Jeremy Grantham 145,821 sh (-4.95%)
Murray Stahl 6,150 sh (-19.85%)
» More
Q2 2015

MNST Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Steven Cohen 36,700 sh (New)
Murray Stahl 6,949 sh (+12.99%)
First Eagle Investment 15,000 sh (unchged)
Jeff Auxier 12,100 sh (unchged)
Pioneer Investments 107,769 sh (-0.38%)
Jeremy Grantham 142,721 sh (-2.13%)
Joel Greenblatt 265,179 sh (-17.05%)
Jim Simons 276,400 sh (-19.56%)
Caxton Associates 20,000 sh (-52.38%)
» More
Q3 2015

MNST Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Caxton Associates 1,166,250 sh (+5731.25%)
First Eagle Investment 15,000 sh (unchged)
Jeff Auxier 12,100 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Murray Stahl 5,243 sh (-24.55%)
Jim Simons 206,700 sh (-25.22%)
Pioneer Investments 70,095 sh (-34.96%)
Jeremy Grantham 15,904 sh (-88.86%)
» More
Q4 2015

MNST Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons 439,000 sh (+112.39%)
First Eagle Investment 15,000 sh (unchged)
Jeff Auxier 12,100 sh (unchged)
Pioneer Investments 56,351 sh (-19.61%)
Murray Stahl 3,984 sh (-24.01%)
Jeremy Grantham 1,611 sh (-89.87%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MNST

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Top Ranked Articles about Monster Beverage Corp

Whitney Tilson's New Emails to Partners Citron’s short report on Monster Beverage
Whitney Tilson (Trades, Portfolio) on Andrew Left’s short thesis on Monster Beverage Read more...
Caxton Associates Adds to Holdings in Monster Beverage Guru trims stake in Citigroup, invests in Macy's
New York-based Caxton Associates (Trades, Portfolio) tends to favor ETFs when it makes investments, and there were some of those in the firm’s third-quarter trading activity, but its largest deals involved companies known for energy drinks and construction. Read more...
Hedge Fund FMR's Largest Buys in Second Quarter Allergan and Monster Beverage top the list of the fund's new holdings
The hedge fund FMR LLC in its last quarterly 13F reported a total value of its portfolio of $780 billion, with a decrease of 0.61% since the previous quarter. During Q2 2015, the investor bought 188 new stocks and increased 1,155 of its existing stakes. The following are the most heavily weighted buys during the quarter. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 42.96
MNST's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
78% of the 137 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 22.46 vs. MNST: 42.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
MNST' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.79  Med: 30.90 Max: 62.85
Current: 42.96
11.79
62.85
Forward P/E 24.94
MNST's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
87% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 17.70 vs. MNST: 24.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 42.86
MNST's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
78% of the 103 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 23.80 vs. MNST: 42.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
MNST' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.6  Med: 30.67 Max: 62.73
Current: 42.86
11.6
62.73
P/B 5.28
MNST's P/B is ranked lower than
82% of the 137 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 2.16 vs. MNST: 5.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
MNST' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.8  Med: 9.64 Max: 27.31
Current: 5.28
3.8
27.31
P/S 8.42
MNST's P/S is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 137 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. MNST: 8.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
MNST' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.02  Med: 4.95 Max: 11.03
Current: 8.42
2.02
11.03
PFCF 135.97
MNST's PFCF is ranked lower than
95% of the 102 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 20.40 vs. MNST: 135.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
MNST' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12  Med: 35.65 Max: 174.49
Current: 135.97
12
174.49
POCF 108.23
MNST's POCF is ranked lower than
95% of the 130 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 12.48 vs. MNST: 108.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
MNST' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.35  Med: 32.01 Max: 142.18
Current: 108.23
11.35
142.18
EV-to-EBIT 25.60
MNST's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
69% of the 137 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 17.15 vs. MNST: 25.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MNST' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.7  Med: 17.70 Max: 39
Current: 25.6
6.7
39
EV-to-EBITDA 24.72
MNST's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
92% of the 137 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 11.97 vs. MNST: 24.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MNST' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.6  Med: 17.20 Max: 37.4
Current: 24.72
6.6
37.4
PEG 2.15
MNST's PEG is ranked higher than
67% of the 39 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.97 vs. MNST: 2.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
MNST' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.82 Max: 3.32
Current: 2.15
0.12
3.32
Shiller P/E 81.14
MNST's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
85% of the 33 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 33.36 vs. MNST: 81.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
MNST' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 39.11  Med: 69.73 Max: 286.75
Current: 81.14
39.11
286.75
Current Ratio 7.43
MNST's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
97% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.51 vs. MNST: 7.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MNST' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 3.26 Max: 7.97
Current: 7.43
0.63
7.97
Quick Ratio 7.12
MNST's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
97% of the 95 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. MNST: 7.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MNST' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 2.19 Max: 7.61
Current: 7.12
0.2
7.61
Days Inventory 59.76
MNST's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
56% of the 97 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 55.53 vs. MNST: 59.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
MNST' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 59.03  Med: 70.93 Max: 79.07
Current: 59.76
59.03
79.07
Days Sales Outstanding 55.48
MNST's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
63% of the 72 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 45.39 vs. MNST: 55.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MNST' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.97  Med: 33.09 Max: 47.39
Current: 55.48
15.97
47.39
Days Payable 77.46
MNST's Days Payable is ranked higher than
68% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 53.85 vs. MNST: 77.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
MNST' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 33.59  Med: 47.09 Max: 58.4
Current: 77.46
33.59
58.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Cash 13.51
MNST's Price/Net Cash is ranked higher than
79% of the 14 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 46.00 vs. MNST: 13.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Cash only.
MNST' s Price/Net Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.47  Med: 36.83 Max: 180.44
Current: 13.51
13.47
180.44
Price/Net Current Asset Value 8.85
MNST's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked higher than
54% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 8.60 vs. MNST: 8.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
MNST' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.86  Med: 10.68 Max: 29
Current: 8.85
3.86
29
Price/Tangible Book 8.44
MNST's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
75% of the 115 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.47 vs. MNST: 8.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
MNST' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.38  Med: 8.51 Max: 29
Current: 8.44
3.38
29
Price/Projected FCF 3.28
MNST's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
86% of the 88 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.69 vs. MNST: 3.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
MNST' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 2.59 Max: 11.28
Current: 3.28
1
11.28
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 1.51
MNST's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked higher than
88% of the 25 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.81 vs. MNST: 1.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 1.70
MNST's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
87% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. MNST: 1.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
MNST' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.63 Max: 1.98
Current: 1.7
0.05
1.98
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 2.37
MNST's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked higher than
52% of the 33 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 2.30 vs. MNST: 2.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
MNST' s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.57  Med: 1.22 Max: 3.25
Current: 2.37
0.57
3.25
Price/Graham Number 4.01
MNST's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
73% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.95 vs. MNST: 4.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
MNST' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.24  Med: 2.94 Max: 7.73
Current: 4.01
1.24
7.73
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 3.82
MNST's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
60% of the 97 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.60 vs. MNST: 3.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
MNST' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.6  Med: 5.70 Max: 14.9
Current: 3.82
2.6
14.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 19.40
MNST's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
85% of the 48 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 7.79 vs. MNST: 19.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
MNST' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 19.1  Med: 31.40 Max: 130
Current: 19.4
19.1
130

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $2683
EPS $ 2.85
Beta1.33
Short Percentage of Float2.08%
52-Week Range $113.08 - 160.50
Shares Outstanding(Mil)202.72

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16 Dec17
Revenue(Mil) 2,754 3,228 3,565
EPS($) 3.09 3.95 4.77
EPS without NRI($) 3.09 3.95 4.77

Latest Earnings Webcast

» More Conference Calls

Business Description

Industry: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic » Beverages - Soft Drinks
Compare:KO, PEP, KOF, SODA, CCLAY » details
Traded in other countries:MOB.Germany,
Monster Beverage Corp was incorporated in Delaware on April 25, 1990 and formerly known as Hansen Natural Corporation. The Company through its subsidiaries markets and distributes energy drinks. It offer energy drinks including Monster Energy energy drinks, Monster Energy Extra Strength Nitrous Technology energy drinks, Java Monster non-carbonated coffee + energy drinks, M3 Monster Energy Super Concentrate energy drinks, Monster Rehab non-carbonated energy drinks with electrolytes, Muscle Monster Energy Shakes, Ubermonster energy drinks, NOS energy drinks, Full Throttle energy drinks, Burn energy drinks, Samurai energy drinks, Relentless energy drinks, Mother energy drinks, Power Play energy drinks, BU energy drinks, Nalu energy drinks, BPM energy drinks, Gladiator energy drinks, and Ultra energy drinks. It has two reportable segments, namely Direct Store Delivery (DSD), whose products comprise energy drinks, and Warehouse, whose principal products comprise juice-based and soda beverages. The DSD segment develops, markets and sells products mainly through an exclusive distributor network, whereas the Warehouse segment develops, markets and sells products directly to retailers. The Company packages its products in a variety of different package types and sizes including, but not limited to, aluminum cans, sleek aluminum cans, glass bottles, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic bottles, high density polyethylene plastic bottles, aseptic boxes and stick packs. It purchases concentrates, sweeteners, juices, flavors, dietary ingredients, cans, bottles, aseptic boxes, caps, labels, trays, boxes and other ingredients for its beverage products from its suppliers, which are delivered to various third party bottlers and co-packers. Its entire beverage products are manufactured by various third party bottlers and co-packers situated throughout the United States and abroad, under separate arrangements with each party. The main raw materials used in the manufacturing of its products are aluminum cans, PET plastic and glass bottles as well as flavors, juice concentrates, sugar, sucralose, milk, cream, dietary ingredients and other packaging materials, the costs of which are subject to fluctuations. Its customers are mainly full service beverage distributors, retail grocery and specialty chains, wholesalers, club stores, drug chains, mass merchandisers, convenience chains, health food distributors, food service customers and the military. The Company's products compete with a range of drinks produced by a relatively large number of companies, many of which have substantially greater financial, marketing and distribution resources than it does. The production, distribution and sale in the United States of many of its products are subject to various U.S. federal and state regulations.
» More Articles for MNST

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Whitney Tilson's New Emails to Partners Feb 05 2016 
Caxton Associates Adds to Holdings in Monster Beverage Dec 21 2015 
Monster Beverage Fizzes Higher Nov 30 2015 
Monster vs. Coca-Cola: Who Wins Head to Head? Nov 30 2015 
Coca-Cola’s New Growth Platforms Will Give Higher Organic Growth Oct 27 2015 
Hedge Fund FMR's Largest Buys in Second Quarter Sep 13 2015 
American International Group One of Most Weighted Buys in Q2 2015 Sep 10 2015 
Monster Beverage Is Overpriced Sep 10 2015 
Perigon Wealth Management's Largest Buys in Second Quarter Sep 08 2015 
Skyworks Solutions Tops Highest-Performing S&P 500 Stocks Jun 05 2015 

More From Other Websites
Coca-Cola's Q4 beats Street Feb 09 2016
Can PepsiCo’s Valuation See Some Upward Revision in 2016? Feb 08 2016
Wells Fargo Upgrades Monster Beverage to “Outperform” Feb 02 2016
Lining up the Consumer Outliers on February 1 Feb 02 2016
Coca-Cola’s Trading at a Higher Valuation than the S&P 500 Feb 02 2016
Street Talk: VRTX, GPRO, TSLA, PGTI Feb 01 2016
Can PepsiCo’s 4Q15 Revenue Rise after 4 Straight Down Quarters? Feb 01 2016
Monster Beverage: An Opportune Time to Buy? Feb 01 2016
Early movers: AET, STR, CAH, TWTR, RH, YHOO & more Feb 01 2016
Monster Beverage upgraded by Wells Fargo Feb 01 2016
Critical Of Monster's Valuation, Citron Anticipates A Drop To $80 Jan 29 2016
7 Great Consumer-Driven Companies That Need to Start Paying Dividends in 2016 Jan 27 2016
Could Monster Beverage’s Stock Rise 15% This Year? Jan 23 2016
Are Strategic Brands Boosting Monster Beverage’s Sales? Jan 22 2016
Which Core Picks Proved Fruitful for TRBCX in 2015? Jan 21 2016
Cramer: Oil's ugly price war just got worse Jan 20 2016
Monster Beverage Increases Its Advertising Efforts Jan 19 2016
Is Investor Thirst For Soft Drink Makers Slaked? Jan 15 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK