Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt No Debt
MNST's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
98% of the 101 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 0.76 vs. MNST: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
MNST' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 167.8 Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity to Asset 0.79
MNST's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
88% of the 95 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 0.57 vs. MNST: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
MNST' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.53  Med: 0.69 Max: 0.85
Current: 0.79
0.53
0.85
Interest Coverage 296.63
MNST's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
76% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 22.35 vs. MNST: 296.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
MNST' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 48.81  Med: No Debt Max: No Debt
Current: 296.63
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 23.96
M-Score: -1.57
WACC vs ROIC
12.56%
32.01%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 36.54
MNST's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
97% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 6.72 vs. MNST: 36.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
MNST' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.82  Med: 26.7 Max: 36.54
Current: 36.54
15.82
36.54
Net-margin (%) 22.73
MNST's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
96% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.51 vs. MNST: 22.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
MNST' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.45  Med: 16.51 Max: 22.73
Current: 22.73
10.45
22.73
ROE (%) 14.70
MNST's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
64% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 9.95 vs. MNST: 14.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
MNST' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.7  Med: 39.71 Max: 55.88
Current: 14.7
14.7
55.88
ROA (%) 12.25
MNST's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
82% of the 101 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.50 vs. MNST: 12.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
MNST' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.25  Med: 27.11 Max: 41.48
Current: 12.25
12.25
41.48
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 249.91
MNST's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
99% of the 101 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 16.30 vs. MNST: 249.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
MNST' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 145.85  Med: 229.5 Max: 370.91
Current: 249.91
145.85
370.91
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 7.90
MNST's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
67% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.70 vs. MNST: 7.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MNST' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.9  Med: 21.3 Max: 68.6
Current: 7.9
7.9
68.6
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 15.40
MNST's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
79% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.00 vs. MNST: 15.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MNST' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.6  Med: 21.1 Max: 149.9
Current: 15.4
-10.6
149.9
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 15.20
MNST's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
80% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: -1.50 vs. MNST: 15.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MNST' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.6  Med: 21.9 Max: 162.3
Current: 15.2
-12.6
162.3
» MNST's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-11-05)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2015

MNST Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Caxton Associates 1,166,250 sh (+5731.25%)
First Eagle Investment 15,000 sh (unchged)
Jeff Auxier 12,100 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Murray Stahl 5,243 sh (-24.55%)
Jim Simons 206,700 sh (-25.22%)
Pioneer Investments 70,095 sh (-34.96%)
Jeremy Grantham 15,904 sh (-88.86%)
» More
Q4 2015

MNST Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Joel Greenblatt 2,895 sh (New)
Louis Moore Bacon 100,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 439,000 sh (+112.39%)
Jeff Auxier 12,100 sh (unchged)
Louis Moore Bacon 60,000 sh (unchged)
First Eagle Investment 15,000 sh (unchged)
Spiros Segalas 1,478,515 sh (unchged)
Pioneer Investments 56,351 sh (-19.61%)
Murray Stahl 3,984 sh (-24.01%)
Caxton Associates 635,893 sh (-45.48%)
Jeremy Grantham 1,611 sh (-89.87%)
» More
Q1 2016

MNST Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Ray Dalio 6,874 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 6,716 sh (New)
Steve Mandel 1,114,561 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 840,500 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 991,000 sh (+55.84%)
Pioneer Investments 70,577 sh (+25.25%)
Spiros Segalas 1,755,087 sh (+18.71%)
First Eagle Investment 15,000 sh (unchged)
Jeff Auxier 12,100 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Murray Stahl 3,787 sh (-4.94%)
Jim Simons 301,800 sh (-31.25%)
Louis Moore Bacon 50,000 sh (-50.00%)
» More
Q2 2016

MNST Guru Trades in Q2 2016

George Soros 16,200 sh (New)
Steve Mandel 4,141,575 sh (+271.59%)
Pioneer Investments 99,629 sh (+41.16%)
Caxton Associates 1,373,000 sh (+38.55%)
Spiros Segalas 2,191,367 sh (+24.86%)
Jeff Auxier 12,100 sh (unchged)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Murray Stahl 2,739 sh (-27.67%)
First Eagle Investment 10,000 sh (-33.33%)
Paul Tudor Jones 4,470 sh (-33.44%)
Jim Simons 188,100 sh (-37.67%)
Steven Cohen 163,276 sh (-80.57%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MNST

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic » Beverages - Soft Drinks
Compare:NYSE:DPS, NYSE:KOF, OTCPK:EMBVF, NYSE:CCE, OTCPK:CCHGY, OTCPK:CCLAY, NYSE:AKO.A, OTCPK:UPCHY, OTCPK:COLZF, OTCPK:CCOJY, NYSE:COT, NAS:FIZZ, OTCPK:BTVCF, OTCPK:VTSYF, OTCPK:FQVTF, NAS:COKE, OTCPK:RFFRY, OTCPK:OCVLF, OTCPK:DYDIF, NAS:PRMW » details
Traded in other countries:MOB.Germany,
Monster Beverage Corp through its subsidiaries markets and distributes energy drinks. It offers energy drinks including Monster Energy, Java Monster, Monster Rehab, NOS, Full Throttle Mother, Power Play and Ultra energy drinks.

Monster Beverage Corp was incorporated in Delaware on April 25, 1990. In 2012, the Company changed its name from Hansen Natural Corporation to Monster Beverage Corporation. The Company develops, markets, sells and distributes energy drink beverages and/or concentrates for energy drink beverages. The Company also developed, marketed, sold and distributed alternative beverage category beverages under the brand names - Peace Tea, Hansen's, Hansen's Natural Cane Soda, Junior Juice, Blue Sky and Hubert's. The Company has three operating and reportable segments Finished Products, which is comprised of Monster Energy drink products; Concentrate, the principal products of which include the supply of concentrates for the Strategic Brands energy drinks acquired from TCCC; Other, the principal products of which include the brands disposed of as a result of the TCCC Transaction. The Company's Monster Energy drinks contain vitamins, minerals, nutrients, herbs and other dietary ingredients and are marketed through full service distributor network. It offers the following energy drinks under the Monster Energy drink product line: Monster Energy, Lo-Carb Monster Energy, Monster Assault, Juice Monster Khaos, Juice Monster Ripper, Juice Monster Pipeline Punch, Monster Energy Absolutely Zero, Monster Energy Import, Punch Monster Baller's Blend, Punch Monster Mad Dog, Monster Ghost M-100, Monster Phantom M-100, Mega Monster Energy, M3 Monster Energy Super Concentrate energy drinks, Ubermonster Energy Brew, Monster Energy Zero Ultra, Monster Energy Ultra Blue, Monster Energy Ultra Red, Monster Energy Ultra Black, Monster Energy Ultra Sunrise, Monster Energy Ultra Citron, Monster Energy Unleaded and Monster Energy Valentino Rossi. Other drinks include Java Monster Coffee + Energy Drinks; Muscle Monster Energy Shakes; Monster Energy Extra Strength Nitrous Technology Energy Drinks; and Monster Rehab Tea + Energy Drinks. The drinks provided in Concentrate Segment are BU; Burn; BPM; Full Throttle; Gladiator; Mother; Nalu; NOS; Play and Power Play; Relentless; Samurai; and Ultra. Under the other segment the brands are Peace Tea Iced Teas and Juice Drinks; Hansen's Brand Sodas; Blue Sky Products; Hansen's Energy Drinks; Hansen's Juice Product; Hansen's Aseptic Juices; and Hubert's Lemonades. The Company packs its products in a variety of different package types and sizes including, but not limited to, aluminum cans, aluminum Cap Cans, sleek aluminum cans, aluminum cans with resealable ends and glass bottles. In addition to these packages, its bottlers package certain of Strategic Brands in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic bottles. For Finished Products segment, the Company purchases concentrates, sweeteners, juices, flavors, dietary ingredients, cans, bottles, caps, labels, trays, boxes and other ingredients for its beverage products from suppliers, which are delivered to various third party bottlers and co-packers. For Concentrate segment, it purch

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 49.02
MNST's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
90% of the 86 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 22.90 vs. MNST: 49.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
MNST' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.8  Med: 31.56 Max: 63.01
Current: 49.02
11.8
63.01
Forward P/E 40.00
MNST's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
76% of the 21 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 21.83 vs. MNST: 40.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 49.02
MNST's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
91% of the 86 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 23.11 vs. MNST: 49.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
MNST' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.6  Med: 31.36 Max: 63.01
Current: 49.02
11.6
63.01
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 60.33
MNST's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked lower than
86% of the 43 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 21.92 vs. MNST: 60.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
MNST' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.12  Med: 34.87 Max: 81.67
Current: 60.33
12.12
81.67
P/B 9.96
MNST's P/B is ranked lower than
90% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. MNST: 9.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
MNST' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.8  Med: 9.47 Max: 27.31
Current: 9.96
3.8
27.31
P/S 10.95
MNST's P/S is ranked lower than
93% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.39 vs. MNST: 10.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
MNST' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.02  Med: 5.11 Max: 11.36
Current: 10.95
2.02
11.36
PFCF 123.93
MNST's PFCF is ranked lower than
98% of the 47 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 20.04 vs. MNST: 123.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
MNST' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.85  Med: 36.23 Max: 167.61
Current: 123.93
11.85
167.61
POCF 105.19
MNST's POCF is ranked lower than
95% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 11.59 vs. MNST: 105.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
MNST' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.39  Med: 32.91 Max: 132.26
Current: 105.19
11.39
132.26
EV-to-EBIT 27.63
MNST's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
83% of the 75 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 17.66 vs. MNST: 27.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MNST' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.7  Med: 18.3 Max: 39
Current: 27.63
6.7
39
EV-to-EBITDA 26.72
MNST's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
91% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 12.40 vs. MNST: 26.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MNST' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.6  Med: 17.7 Max: 37.4
Current: 26.72
6.6
37.4
PEG 2.52
MNST's PEG is ranked lower than
54% of the 39 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 2.13 vs. MNST: 2.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
MNST' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.95 Max: 3.31
Current: 2.52
0.12
3.31
Shiller P/E 91.25
MNST's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
95% of the 19 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 32.05 vs. MNST: 91.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
MNST' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 39.11  Med: 70.4 Max: 199.59
Current: 91.25
39.11
199.59
Current Ratio 2.60
MNST's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
83% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.56 vs. MNST: 2.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MNST' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 3.3 Max: 7.97
Current: 2.6
0.63
7.97
Quick Ratio 2.25
MNST's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. MNST: 2.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MNST' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 2.24 Max: 7.61
Current: 2.25
0.2
7.61
Days Inventory 55.55
MNST's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
53% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 54.80 vs. MNST: 55.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
MNST' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 55.36  Med: 70.93 Max: 79.07
Current: 55.55
55.36
79.07
Days Sales Outstanding 58.42
MNST's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
65% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 44.96 vs. MNST: 58.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MNST' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.97  Med: 37.42 Max: 58.42
Current: 58.42
15.97
58.42
Days Payable 60.75
MNST's Days Payable is ranked higher than
61% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 51.29 vs. MNST: 60.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
MNST' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 33.59  Med: 47.09 Max: 60.75
Current: 60.75
33.59
60.75

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -7.00
MNST's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
80% of the 40 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: -2.30 vs. MNST: -7.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MNST' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7  Med: -1.4 Max: 2
Current: -7
-7
2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 71.33
MNST's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
93% of the 41 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 13.35 vs. MNST: 71.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
MNST' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.86  Med: 10.86 Max: 73.05
Current: 71.33
3.86
73.05
Price/Tangible Book 38.56
MNST's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
98% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.12 vs. MNST: 38.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
MNST' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.21  Med: 8.63 Max: 53.33
Current: 38.56
3.21
53.33
Price/Projected FCF 4.48
MNST's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
93% of the 42 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.63 vs. MNST: 4.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
MNST' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 2.62 Max: 11.28
Current: 4.48
1
11.28
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 1.72
MNST's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
54% of the 13 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.19 vs. MNST: 1.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 2.15
MNST's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
89% of the 88 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. MNST: 2.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
MNST' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.06  Med: 0.62 Max: 2.2
Current: 2.15
0.06
2.2
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 2.71
MNST's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
65% of the 20 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.90 vs. MNST: 2.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
MNST' s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.43  Med: 1.2 Max: 3.23
Current: 2.71
0.43
3.23
Price/Graham Number 9.17
MNST's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
97% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.76 vs. MNST: 9.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
MNST' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.18  Med: 3.13 Max: 9.39
Current: 9.17
1.18
9.39
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 3.67
MNST's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
65% of the 95 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.90 vs. MNST: 3.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
MNST' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.6  Med: 5.5 Max: 14.9
Current: 3.67
2.6
14.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 19.28
MNST's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
81% of the 47 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 6.78 vs. MNST: 19.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
MNST' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 19.1  Med: 30.8 Max: 122
Current: 19.28
19.1
122

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $2,910
EPS (TTM) $ 3.20
Beta1.47
Short Percentage of Float2.33%
52-Week Range $113.08 - 166.50
Shares Outstanding (Mil)190.36

Analyst Estimate


Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/gurufocu/public_html/modules/stock/estimate.php on line 163
Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 3,091 3,495 3,877
EPS ($) 3.92 4.80 5.46
EPS w/o NRI ($) 3.92 4.80 5.46
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
21.71%
Dividends Per Share ($)
» More Articles for NAS:MNST

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
5 Companies Achieve 52-Week Highs Jul 05 2016 
Weekly CEO Sells Highlights Jun 21 2016 
Steven Cohen Invests in Netflix and ConocoPhillips May 30 2016 
Steve Mandel Buys Allergan, Baxalta, PayPal May 25 2016 
Steven Cohen Invests in Monster Beverage May 23 2016 
Guru Stocks With Steady Returns: NetEase, Monster Beverage May 04 2016 
Caxton Associates Slashes Position in Monster Beverage Mar 01 2016 
Whitney Tilson's New Emails to Partners Feb 05 2016 
Caxton Associates Adds to Holdings in Monster Beverage Dec 21 2015 
Monster Beverage Fizzes Higher Nov 30 2015 

More From Other Websites
Monster Beverage Gains from Strength in Energy Drinks Category Aug 24 2016
Monster Beverage Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : MNST-US : August 24,... Aug 24 2016
Top Research Reports for August 23, 2016 Aug 23 2016
Why Coke Should Make One Monster of a Deal Aug 22 2016
3 Takeaways From Recent IRI Retail Data Aug 20 2016
4 Growth Leaders You Should Watch; Are These Big Tech Stocks Stalling? Aug 15 2016
Crude Volatile; Actionable Trading Opportunities Next Week? Aug 12 2016
MONSTER BEVERAGE CORP Financials Aug 12 2016
Insider Buying Volume Hitting Historic Lows Should Not Worry Investors; Noteworthy Insider... Aug 12 2016
What Do Analysts Recommend for Monster after 2Q16 Results? Aug 12 2016
How 2Q16 Results Impacted Monster Beverage’s Valuation Aug 11 2016
What Drove Monster Beverage’s Gross Margin in 2Q16? Aug 11 2016
What Were the Key Drivers behind Monster’s 2Q16 Sales Growth? Aug 10 2016
Monster Missed 2Q16 Estimates despite Strong Earnings Growth Aug 10 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Monster Beverage Corp. : August 9, 2016 Aug 09 2016
Post Earnings Coverage as Monster Beverage Revenue Climbs 19 Percent Aug 09 2016
Monster Beverage Corp. :MNST-US: Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2016 By the Numbers : August 8, 2016 Aug 08 2016
Jobs Data Spur Big Gains For Stocks; Financials Lead, Utilities Lag Aug 05 2016
MONSTER BEVERAGE CORP Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Aug 05 2016
Restaurant Stocks Power Higher On Earnings; Apple Boosts Nasdaq Aug 05 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)