Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt No Debt
MNST's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
98% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 0.75 vs. MNST: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
MNST' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.01  Med: 58.46 Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity to Asset 0.70
MNST's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
82% of the 83 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 0.54 vs. MNST: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
MNST' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.46  Med: 0.68 Max: 0.8
Current: 0.7
0.46
0.8
Interest Coverage No Debt
MNST's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
98% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 24.43 vs. MNST: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
MNST' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 1.5  Med: 525.04 Max: 9999.99
Current: No Debt
1.5
9999.99
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 32.20
M-Score: -2.60
WACC vs ROIC
11.10%
98.61%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 23.72
MNST's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
97% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 6.33 vs. MNST: 23.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
MNST' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -3.53  Med: 17.31 Max: 30.33
Current: 23.72
-3.53
30.33
Net-margin (%) 15.35
MNST's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.63 vs. MNST: 15.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
MNST' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -3.82  Med: 10.88 Max: 19.6
Current: 15.35
-3.82
19.6
ROE (%) 29.16
MNST's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 7.22 vs. MNST: 29.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
MNST' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: 4.65  Med: 30.13 Max: 68.2
Current: 29.16
4.65
68.2
ROA (%) 21.21
MNST's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
96% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.31 vs. MNST: 21.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
MNST' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: 2.38  Med: 22.53 Max: 51.05
Current: 21.21
2.38
51.05
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 183.88
MNST's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
97% of the 90 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 14.85 vs. MNST: 183.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
MNST' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 33.61  Med: 162.67 Max: 337.55
Current: 183.88
33.61
337.55
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 15.70
MNST's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
86% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.10 vs. MNST: 15.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MNST' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 8.6  Med: 21.50 Max: 68.8
Current: 15.7
8.6
68.8
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 20.50
MNST's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
86% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.40 vs. MNST: 20.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MNST' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: 21.20 Max: 139.6
Current: 20.5
0
139.6
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 21.90
MNST's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
81% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. MNST: 21.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MNST' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -12.6  Med: 23.95 Max: 155.4
Current: 21.9
-12.6
155.4
» MNST's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2014

MNST Guru Trades in Q2 2014

Ray Dalio 4,399 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 544,493 sh (New)
Jim Simons 532,300 sh (+718.47%)
Louis Moore Bacon 40,000 sh (+574.76%)
Jeremy Grantham 166,731 sh (+74.23%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 178,520 sh (+24.19%)
Jeff Auxier 13,100 sh (unchged)
First Eagle Investment 15,000 sh (unchged)
Mario Cibelli 30,000 sh (unchged)
George Soros Sold Out
Pioneer Investments 161,329 sh (-4.58%)
Murray Stahl 10,744 sh (-6.64%)
Paul Tudor Jones 3,351 sh (-50.80%)
» More
Q3 2014

MNST Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Ray Dalio 77,712 sh (+1666.58%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 212,660 sh (+19.12%)
Jeff Auxier 13,100 sh (unchged)
First Eagle Investment 15,000 sh (unchged)
Pioneer Investments 127,441 sh (unchged)
Mario Cibelli 30,000 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jim Simons 522,800 sh (-1.78%)
Jeremy Grantham 155,337 sh (-6.83%)
Murray Stahl 9,091 sh (-15.39%)
Joel Greenblatt 320,894 sh (-41.07%)
Louis Moore Bacon 10,000 sh (-75.00%)
» More
Q4 2014

MNST Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Steven Cohen 4,000 sh (New)
Mario Cibelli 30,000 sh (unchged)
First Eagle Investment 15,000 sh (unchged)
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt 317,067 sh (-1.19%)
Jeremy Grantham 153,421 sh (-1.23%)
Jeff Auxier 12,600 sh (-3.82%)
Pioneer Investments 108,793 sh (-14.63%)
Murray Stahl 7,673 sh (-15.60%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 144,880 sh (-31.87%)
Jim Simons 338,900 sh (-35.18%)
» More
Q1 2015

MNST Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Caxton Associates 42,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 343,600 sh (+1.39%)
Joel Greenblatt 319,672 sh (+0.82%)
First Eagle Investment 15,000 sh (unchged)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc Sold Out
Mario Cibelli Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Jeff Auxier Sold Out
Pioneer Investments 108,178 sh (-0.57%)
Jeremy Grantham 145,821 sh (-4.95%)
Murray Stahl 6,150 sh (-19.85%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MNST

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Monster Beverage Corp

David Rolfe Comments on Monster Beverage - Oct 22, 2013

Monster Beverage (MNST)

Monster Beverage detracted from performance as revenue growth decelerated in the face of negative press related to the safety profile of energy drinks. Despite this transient headwind, the brand continues to take share, profitably, from traditional carbonated soft drinks. We continue to expect the Company's growth profile, over a multi-year period, will eclipse double-digits, despite periodic negative press. Energy drinks continue to be a highly disruptive offering in the beverage industry, driven by a generational shift in preference for caffeinated products. While the level of caffeine in the typical Monster Energy drink is higher than most traditional carbonated soft drinks, it has half as much (per ounce) than most popular coffee house offerings. We believe this relatively new value proposition should position Monster to continue taking share from traditional beverage incumbents.

From David Rolfe's Wedgewood Partners third quarter 2013 commentary.


Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 61.80
MNST's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
84% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 24.80 vs. MNST: 61.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
MNST' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 11.79  Med: 29.98 Max: 62.85
Current: 61.8
11.79
62.85
Forward P/E 34.97
MNST's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
90% of the 31 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 18.62 vs. MNST: 34.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 61.70
MNST's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
85% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 24.30 vs. MNST: 61.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
MNST' s 10-Year PE(NRI) Range
Min: 11.6  Med: 29.88 Max: 62.73
Current: 61.7
11.6
62.73
P/B 16.15
MNST's P/B is ranked lower than
95% of the 85 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 2.76 vs. MNST: 16.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
MNST' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 3.8  Med: 9.71 Max: 27.31
Current: 16.15
3.8
27.31
P/S 9.50
MNST's P/S is ranked lower than
93% of the 87 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.33 vs. MNST: 9.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
MNST' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 1.73  Med: 4.74 Max: 11.03
Current: 9.5
1.73
11.03
PFCF 71.49
MNST's PFCF is ranked lower than
90% of the 41 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 21.06 vs. MNST: 71.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
MNST' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 12  Med: 34.33 Max: 77.2
Current: 71.49
12
77.2
POCF 66.39
MNST's POCF is ranked lower than
93% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 14.71 vs. MNST: 66.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
MNST' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 11.35  Med: 30.51 Max: 72.79
Current: 66.39
11.35
72.79
EV-to-EBIT 45.30
MNST's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
83% of the 71 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 17.99 vs. MNST: 45.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MNST' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 6.7  Med: 17.30 Max: 39
Current: 45.3
6.7
39
PEG 3.05
MNST's PEG is ranked higher than
66% of the 35 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.69 vs. MNST: 3.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
MNST' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.80 Max: 3.84
Current: 3.05
0.13
3.84
Shiller P/E 79.54
MNST's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
91% of the 46 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 25.55 vs. MNST: 79.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
MNST' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 24  Med: 48.79 Max: 208.53
Current: 79.54
24
208.53
Current Ratio 3.35
MNST's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
90% of the 86 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.52 vs. MNST: 3.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MNST' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.63  Med: 3.16 Max: 6.99
Current: 3.35
0.63
6.99
Quick Ratio 2.99
MNST's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
91% of the 86 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. MNST: 2.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MNST' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.2  Med: 2.06 Max: 5.78
Current: 2.99
0.2
5.78
Days Inventory 63.75
MNST's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
59% of the 87 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 51.91 vs. MNST: 63.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
MNST' s 10-Year Days Inventory Range
Min: 51.31  Med: 72.18 Max: 88.77
Current: 63.75
51.31
88.77
Days Sales Outstanding 49.05
MNST's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
57% of the 72 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 46.07 vs. MNST: 49.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MNST' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 9.23  Med: 26.97 Max: 47.39
Current: 49.05
9.23
47.39

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Cash 60.35
MNST's Price/Net Cash is ranked higher than
50% of the 10 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 60.35 vs. MNST: 60.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Cash only.
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Net Cash Range
Min: 13.47  Med: 41.03 Max: 180.44
Current: 60.35
13.47
180.44
Price/Net Current Asset Value 19.36
MNST's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
74% of the 38 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 13.04 vs. MNST: 19.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Net Current Asset Value Range
Min: 3.89  Med: 11.07 Max: 28.9
Current: 19.36
3.89
28.9
Price/Tangible Book 16.76
MNST's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
89% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 3.86 vs. MNST: 16.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 3.4  Med: 8.01 Max: 28.9
Current: 16.76
3.4
28.9
Price/Projected FCF 4.62
MNST's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
89% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.75 vs. MNST: 4.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Projected FCF Range
Min: 1.01  Med: 2.58 Max: 11.28
Current: 4.62
1.01
11.28
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 2.17
MNST's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
89% of the 9 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.65 vs. MNST: 2.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 2.00
MNST's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
90% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. MNST: 2.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.60 Max: 2.07
Current: 2
0.03
2.07
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 3.32
MNST's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
75% of the 20 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.78 vs. MNST: 3.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.57  Med: 1.20 Max: 3.3
Current: 3.32
0.57
3.3
Price/Graham Number 6.71
MNST's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
91% of the 53 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 1.99 vs. MNST: 6.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
MNST' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 1.3  Med: 2.76 Max: 7.28
Current: 6.71
1.3
7.28
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 2.20
MNST's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 86 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 4.10 vs. MNST: 2.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
MNST' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 2.6  Med: 5.80 Max: 14.9
Current: 2.2
2.6
14.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 19.72
MNST's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
80% of the 46 Companies
in the Global Beverages - Soft Drinks industry.

( Industry Median: 8.99 vs. MNST: 19.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
MNST' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: 8.1  Med: 31.90 Max: 136.5
Current: 19.72
8.1
136.5

Business Description

Industry: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic » Beverages - Soft Drinks
Compare:KO, PEP, KOF, SODA, CCLAY » details
Traded in other countries:MOB.Germany,
Monster Beverage Corp was incorporated in Delaware on April 25, 1990 andformerly known as Hansen Natural Corporation. The Company through its subsidiaries develops, markets, sells and distributes alternative beverage category natural sodas, fruit juices, juice blends, juice drinks, energy drinks and energy sports drinks, fruit juice smoothies and functional drinks, non-carbonated ready-to-drink iced teas, children's multi-vitamin juice drinks, Junior Juice juices, Junior Juice Water and flavored sparkling beverages under the Hansen's brand name. It has two reportable segments, namely Direct Store Delivery (DSD), whose products comprise energy drinks, and Warehouse, whose principal products comprise juice-based and soda beverages. The DSD segment develops, markets and sells products mainly through an exclusive distributor network, whereas the Warehouse segment develops, markets and sells products directly to retailers. The Company packages its products in a variety of different package types and sizes including, but not limited to, aluminum cans, sleek aluminum cans, glass bottles, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic bottles, high density polyethylene plastic bottles, aseptic boxes and stick packs. It purchases concentrates, sweeteners, juices, flavors, dietary ingredients, cans, bottles, aseptic boxes, caps, labels, trays, boxes and other ingredients for its beverage products from its suppliers, which are delivered to various third party bottlers and co-packers. Its entire beverage products are manufactured by various third party bottlers and co-packers situated throughout the United States and abroad, under separate arrangements with each party. The main raw materials used in the manufacturing of its products are aluminum cans, PET plastic and glass bottles as well as flavors, juice concentrates, sugar, sucralose, milk, cream, dietary ingredients and other packaging materials, the costs of which are subject to fluctuations. Its customers are mainly full service beverage distributors, retail grocery and specialty chains, wholesalers, club stores, drug chains, mass merchandisers, convenience chains, health food distributors, food service customers and the military. The Company's products compete with a range of drinks produced by a relatively large number of companies, many of which have substantially greater financial, marketing and distribution resources than it does. The production, distribution and sale in the United States of many of its products are subject to various U.S. federal and state regulations.
» More Articles for MNST

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Skyworks Solutions Tops Highest-Performing S&P 500 Stocks Jun 05 2015 
BMO Analyst Upgrades Coca-Cola Jun 01 2015 
Ray Dalio initiates a Position in Coca-Cola May 22 2015 
Monster Beverage's Earnings Bogged Down By Coca Cola Partnership: Analysis May 14 2015 
Does Increasing Health Awareness Spell Trouble for Coca-Cola? May 14 2015 
Top Seven Stocks to Watch May 04 2015 
Weekly CEO Sells Highlight: Hovnanian Enterprises Inc, Regulus Therapeutics Inc, Monster Beverage Co Apr 27 2015 
Weekly Insider Sells Highlight: MNST, GS, EVHC, CMG Apr 26 2015 
Dividend Stocks To Avoid For Now Mar 27 2015 
Stocks With Consistently High Growth Rates Since 2005 Mar 21 2015 

More From Other Websites
Mintel Forecasts Strong Growth in the US Energy Drink Market Jun 26 2015
Why Are Millennials a Key Demographic for Monster Beverage? Jun 26 2015
Monster Fights to Stay in India After Its Drinks Are Banned Jun 26 2015
Monster Beverage: 'Best in Class' Jun 26 2015
Are Parents Driving Energy Drink Sales in the US? Jun 25 2015
Energy Drinks Continue to Thrive despite Controversies Jun 25 2015
Cramer -- Monster Beverage Stock Will Jump When Coke Starts Distributing Jun 25 2015
Cramer's Stop Trading: Monster Beverage & Methode Electro... Jun 25 2015
Stock is up 6,000% and there's still time to buy Jun 24 2015
Coca-Cola Deal Gives Monster Beverage Yet Another Boost Jun 24 2015
Dow 30 Stock Roundup: UTX Revises Guidance, P&G Sells Units to Coty - Analyst Blog Jun 19 2015
Nasdaq's new record by the numbers Jun 19 2015
New heights in market Jun 19 2015
Volatility Marks the Day for US Markets on June 16 Jun 17 2015
If Coke Bought WTER Today - It Would Pay 5X Current Market Price Jun 17 2015
Cramer: Red hot stocks screaming for a takeover Jun 16 2015
Stock Pops & Drops: COTY, BOX, MNST & SUNE Jun 16 2015
Street Talk: RAI, CAVM, PWR, MNST & LPG Jun 16 2015
Monster Beverage: Yes, We're Doubling Down Jun 16 2015
Monster Beverage Transfers Non-Energy Drinks to Coca-Cola Jun 16 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK