Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.33
MOG.A's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
59% of the 189 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.47 vs. MOG.A: 0.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
MOG.A' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.1 Max: N/A
Current: 0.33
Equity-to-Asset 0.33
MOG.A's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
63% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. MOG.A: 0.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
MOG.A' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 0.34 Max: 0.49
Current: 0.33
0.22
0.49
Interest Coverage 6.72
MOG.A's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
67% of the 138 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 12.65 vs. MOG.A: 6.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
MOG.A' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.59  Med: 6.3 Max: 20.35
Current: 6.72
3.59
20.35
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 3.00
Beneish M-Score: -2.90
WACC vs ROIC
9.84%
9.92%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 9.60
MOG.A's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
68% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 4.45 vs. MOG.A: 9.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
MOG.A' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.63  Med: 9.49 Max: 11.2
Current: 9.6
7.63
11.2
Net Margin % 5.39
MOG.A's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
60% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 3.57 vs. MOG.A: 5.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
MOG.A' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.6  Med: 5.55 Max: 6.48
Current: 5.39
4.6
6.48
ROE % 13.02
MOG.A's ROE % is ranked higher than
66% of the 175 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 6.89 vs. MOG.A: 13.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
MOG.A' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.26  Med: 11.51 Max: 12.78
Current: 13.02
8.26
12.78
ROA % 4.27
MOG.A's ROA % is ranked higher than
62% of the 191 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.31 vs. MOG.A: 4.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
MOG.A' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.5  Med: 4.55 Max: 5.63
Current: 4.27
3.5
5.63
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 17.01
MOG.A's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
61% of the 191 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 10.76 vs. MOG.A: 17.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
MOG.A' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.34  Med: 16.6 Max: 21.43
Current: 17.01
13.34
21.43
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 5.00
MOG.A's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
54% of the 172 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 3.90 vs. MOG.A: 5.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
MOG.A' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.8  Med: 6.7 Max: 18.2
Current: 5
-7.8
18.2
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 8.60
MOG.A's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
62% of the 133 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 5.40 vs. MOG.A: 8.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
MOG.A' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.9  Med: 5.8 Max: 70.4
Current: 8.6
-13.9
70.4
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 9.70
MOG.A's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
57% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. MOG.A: 9.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
MOG.A' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -34.8  Med: 12.5 Max: 91
Current: 9.7
-34.8
91
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with Moog Inc $MOG.A.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» MOG.A's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

MOG.A Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 121,790 sh (+103.78%)
Jim Simons 199,700 sh (+9.42%)
Mario Gabelli 103,100 sh (+0.19%)
Chuck Royce 33,000 sh (-2.94%)
Paul Tudor Jones 15,344 sh (-22.94%)
Columbia Wanger 229,469 sh (-61.56%)
Joel Greenblatt 27,154 sh (-91.45%)
» More
Q2 2016

MOG.A Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Mario Gabelli 103,300 sh (+0.19%)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 121,507 sh (-0.23%)
Chuck Royce 31,000 sh (-6.06%)
Columbia Wanger 188,830 sh (-17.71%)
Paul Tudor Jones 8,714 sh (-43.21%)
» More
Q3 2016

MOG.A Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Joel Greenblatt 80,958 sh (New)
Jim Simons 16,700 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,518 sh (+43.65%)
Columbia Wanger Sold Out
Mario Gabelli 100,800 sh (-2.42%)
Chuck Royce 30,000 sh (-3.23%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 115,199 sh (-5.19%)
» More
Q4 2016

MOG.A Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 46,845 sh (+180.51%)
Mario Gabelli 100,800 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 30,000 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 115,001 sh (-0.17%)
Paul Tudor Jones 9,862 sh (-21.22%)
Joel Greenblatt 47,735 sh (-41.04%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MOG.A

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Aerospace & Defense » Aerospace & Defense    NAICS: 333996    SIC: 3721
Compare:NYSE:ESL, NAS:KLXI, NYSE:DGI, OTCPK:QNTQF, OTCPK:YSHLF, OTCPK:UEHPY, OTCPK:CBHMF, NYSE:AJRD, OTCPK:BDRBF, NYSE:CUB, NYSE:KAMN, NYSE:TGI, NAS:AAXN, NYSE:AIR, NAS:AOBC, NYSE:RGR, NAS:ATRO, NYSE:ERJ, NYSE:CAE, NAS:WWD » details
Traded in other countries:MO7A.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Moog Inc is a designer, manufacturer and systems integrator of high performance precision motion and fluid controls and controls systems for applications in aerospace and defense and industrial markets.

Moog Inc is a worldwide manufacturer of precision motion and fluid controls systems for the aerospace and defense markets. It has a diversified product range and operates in five segments: Aircraft Controls, Space and Defense Controls, Industrial Systems, Components, and Medical Devices. The company has a wide sales and marketing reach with sales staff being the main contact with customers. Additionally, it will use manufacturers' representatives and distributors to market in certain segments. Sales under United States government contracts represent approximately one third of total revenue. Although over half of total sales originate in the United States, the company serves many European and Asian nations.

Top Ranked Articles about Moog Inc

Kraken Reports 2015 Financial Results

Sensors-to-Systems Strategy, Acquisition, and Key Personnel Positions Company for Growth in 2016

ST. JOHN'S, NL--(Marketwired - May 02, 2016) - Kraken Sonar Inc. (TSX VENTURE: PNG) announced it has filed its financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2015. Additional information concerning the Company, including its audited consolidated financial statements and related management's discussion and analysis ("MD&A") for the year ended December 31, 2015, can be found at www.sedar.com. Unless otherwise stated, all dollar amounts are Canadian dollar denominated. 2015 Financial Highlights

Revenues for the 12 months ended December 30, 2015 were $1.9 million as compared to $2.4 million in the comparable year ago period. Excluding a one-time research contract in 2014, revenues declined slightly from $2.1 million to $1.9 million. In addition, a customer product shipment slipped into early 2016 and as a result, Kraken was unable to recognize this $0.2 million of revenue in Q4 2015. Approximately 90% of Kraken's 2015 revenues were generated from Synthetic Aperture Sonar sensor sales, with the balance from the new KATFISH™, AquaTrak® and SoundPix® products. These new products were introduced in the second half of 2015 and their revenues are expected to materially ramp in 2016. Excluding non-cash items including RTO listing expenses, stock compensation and a bad debt expense, the operating loss for 2015 was $0.8 million versus an operating profit of $0.4 million in 2014. The difference reflects our investment in new product development, people, and marketing. Kraken ended Q4 2015 with approximately $0.8 million in cash and was debt free. Cash increased approximately $0.1 million from the September quarter, but was down $0.6 million from the end of 2014. At 2015 year-end, Kraken still had over $1.4 million in awarded but unbilled customer contract milestone payments and financial contribution payments. We expect these revenues will be collected during 2016. In the second half of 2015, Kraken recorded a bad debt expense of approximately $0.3 million on a receivable from a foreign customer in the oil and gas survey sector. Kraken had collected approximately two-thirds of the revenue from this customer, but due to their business challenges the customer had not paid the balance. In Q4 Kraken repossessed the sensor with plans to use this equipment for sea trials with a potential European customer in Q1 2016. Kraken expects to monetize this asset with the European customer in Q2 2016. Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding were unchanged at 71 million. Subsequent to the 2015 year-end, other notable events include:

Awarded a $600,000 contract by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Received repayment of the shareholder loan receivable of $200,000 Awarded a non-dilutive financial contribution of $500,000 from the National Research Council of Canada Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC-IRAP) for KATFISH™ product development. CEO Comments
"This has been an exciting year for Kraken, as we continued to invest and evolve our SAS sonar technology into integrated systems. During 2015 we continued implementation of our Sensors to Systems strategy to be positioned to meet the emerging market opportunities in marine robotics", stated Karl Kenny, President and CEO of Kraken. "We believe our investments in 2015 will pave the way for an acceleration of bookings and revenue in 2016 and 2017. As the Company's largest shareholder, I remain very enthusiastic about Unmanned Maritime Systems (UMS) and their multi-billion dollar potential within the ocean technology industry. Both the military and commercial UMS markets are very dynamic with new research, development and procurement programs appearing around the world. " 2015 Business Highlights

Going public in February 2015 has opened new doors for access to capital to allow us to invest in growth initiatives. We added new names to our customer roster, including major brands across the military and commercial markets. We have now sold to customers across multiple regions including North America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Australia. Our customer base includes many world navies and leading defense contractors. We increased our market access with new distribution partners Tritech (a subsidiary of Moog (NYSE: MOG.A), Elbit Systems (NASDAQ: ESLT), and Caris (recently acquired by Teledyne). While we are a leading sonar technology company, our distribution partnerships are essential to accessing large markets without having to invest significant resources in setting up new channels. We added some of the best minds in the underwater robotics industry to our team in 2015. This expands our knowledge of the sector and enables us to continue with some of the most advanced technical innovation in the industry. We launched several new industry changing products including the KATFISH™ intelligent towfish system, the AquaTrak® Correlation Velocity Log and our SoundPix® real-time 3D seabed mapping solution. New products like KATFISH™ have considerably higher ASPs than our traditional sensor business all the while still maintaining strong gross margins of 50% . We acquired the underwater robotics technology and related intellectual property rights previously owned by Marine Robotics Inc. This acquisition brings us an extensive underwater technology portfolio and builds upon our Sensors to Systems strategy to be a market leader in the UMS industry. We recently added an additional 5,000 square feet of manufacturing space at a new facility to allow for enhanced manufacturing capacity required as our business ramps. Outlook for 2016
In 2016, we will continue to invest to meet the expected demand driven by our recent product and partnering announcements and ongoing evolution of our Sensors to Systems strategy:
We believe our KATFISH™ product will disrupt current industry solutions based on market feedback to-date. While we will not deliver our first unit until later this year, we are seeing considerable interest from both military and commercial market sectors. At US$1.5 million per unit, KATFISH™ should drive considerable revenues compared to our historical financials. We anticipate concluding additional strategic partnerships in 2016, both for new products and distribution, across military and commercial channels. We expect to add additional world-class underwater robotics talent, technology and products. We expect a material ramp in bookings and revenues versus 2015. While sales cycles are often long and timing of orders can be uncertain, the increased level of activity and discussions with current and potential customers make us confident that we should see strong growth in 2016 and 2017. Our technology and products are often key differentiators in our customer's solutions to their end customers. "I would like to thank the Kraken team for their hard work in helping us move up the marine robotics value chain," said Mr. Kenny. During 2015, we made significant but prudent investments in growth initiatives including the hiring of new personnel, expanded engineering design and manufacturing operations, acquisition of underwater robotics IP, continued product innovation and development of international distribution channels. I would also like to thank our customers, partners and shareholders for their continued support in the pursuit of our objectives. ABOUT KRAKEN SONAR INC.
Kraken Sonar Inc. (TSX VENTURE: PNG) is an industrial technology company, founded in 2012, that is dedicated to the production and sale of software-centric Synthetic Aperture Sonar technology. The Company's products have been sold to leading defence contractors, commercial survey companies and research institutions for producing real-time, ultra high resolution imagery and bathymetry of the seabed. Marine Technology Reporter has three times named Kraken to their MTR100 -- a list of the 100 most influential companies in the international marine technology marketplace. For more information, please visit www.krakensonar.com.  Certain information in this news release constitutes forward-looking statements. When used in this news release, the words "may", "would", "could", "will", "intend", "plan", "anticipate", "believe", "seek", "propose", "estimate", "expect", and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In particular, this news release contains forward-looking statements with respect to, among other things, business objectives, expected growth, results of operations, performance, business projects and opportunities and financial results. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the Company's current views with respect to future events based on certain material factors and assumptions and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including without limitation, changes in market, competition, governmental or regulatory developments, general economic conditions and other factors set out in the Company's public disclosure documents. Many factors could cause the Company's actual results, performance or achievements to vary from those described in this news release, including without limitation those listed above. These factors should not be construed as exhaustive. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should assumptions underlying forward-looking statements prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in this news release and such forward-looking statements included in, or incorporated by reference in this news release, should not be unduly relied upon. Such statements speak only as of the date of this news release. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this news release are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange Inc. nor its Regulation Services Provide (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Greg Reid
Chief Financial Officer
(416) 818-9822
[email protected]

Sean Peasgood
Investor Relations
(416) 565-2805
[email protected]

Glenda Leyte
Marketing Manager
(709) 757-5757 extension 288
[email protected]



Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 19.02
MOG.A's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
63% of the 125 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 21.29 vs. MOG.A: 19.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
MOG.A' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.86  Med: 17.08 Max: 27.61
Current: 19.02
6.86
27.61
Forward PE Ratio 18.55
MOG.A's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 167 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 17.83 vs. MOG.A: 18.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 19.02
MOG.A's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
66% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 20.97 vs. MOG.A: 19.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
MOG.A' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.86  Med: 17.08 Max: 27.61
Current: 19.02
6.86
27.61
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 14.73
MOG.A's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
74% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 21.19 vs. MOG.A: 14.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
MOG.A' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.43  Med: 17.8 Max: 300.65
Current: 14.73
8.43
300.65
PB Ratio 2.58
MOG.A's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
55% of the 179 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.31 vs. MOG.A: 2.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
MOG.A' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.78  Med: 1.79 Max: 2.62
Current: 2.58
0.78
2.62
PS Ratio 1.03
MOG.A's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
59% of the 188 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. MOG.A: 1.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
MOG.A' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.42  Med: 0.92 Max: 1.33
Current: 1.03
0.42
1.33
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 12.69
MOG.A's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
74% of the 85 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 19.59 vs. MOG.A: 12.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
MOG.A' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.01  Med: 15.82 Max: 129.47
Current: 12.69
8.01
129.47
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 9.38
MOG.A's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
73% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 12.79 vs. MOG.A: 9.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
MOG.A' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.76  Med: 10.06 Max: 116.37
Current: 9.38
5.76
116.37
EV-to-EBIT 14.80
MOG.A's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
59% of the 261 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 15.25 vs. MOG.A: 14.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MOG.A' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.9  Med: 13.1 Max: 20.6
Current: 14.8
7.9
20.6
EV-to-EBITDA 10.13
MOG.A's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
72% of the 281 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 12.69 vs. MOG.A: 10.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MOG.A' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.8  Med: 9.3 Max: 12.9
Current: 10.13
5.8
12.9
PEG Ratio 4.87
MOG.A's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
73% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.78 vs. MOG.A: 4.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
MOG.A' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 2.31 Max: 7.33
Current: 4.87
0.41
7.33
Shiller PE Ratio 22.06
MOG.A's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
77% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 30.65 vs. MOG.A: 22.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
MOG.A' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.7  Med: 20.87 Max: 33.17
Current: 22.06
10.7
33.17
Current Ratio 2.67
MOG.A's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 189 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.58 vs. MOG.A: 2.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MOG.A' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.92  Med: 2.46 Max: 3.1
Current: 2.67
1.92
3.1
Quick Ratio 1.85
MOG.A's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
82% of the 188 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. MOG.A: 1.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MOG.A' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.27  Med: 1.6 Max: 2.01
Current: 1.85
1.27
2.01
Days Inventory 104.39
MOG.A's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
54% of the 179 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 116.43 vs. MOG.A: 104.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
MOG.A' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 103.08  Med: 108.6 Max: 124.19
Current: 104.39
103.08
124.19
Days Sales Outstanding 42.26
MOG.A's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
74% of the 159 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 58.48 vs. MOG.A: 42.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MOG.A' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 52.25  Med: 101.07 Max: 110.05
Current: 42.26
52.25
110.05
Days Payable 31.64
MOG.A's Days Payable is ranked lower than
79% of the 149 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 54.51 vs. MOG.A: 31.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
MOG.A' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 31.01  Med: 36.11 Max: 40.42
Current: 31.64
31.01
40.42

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 7.50
MOG.A's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
99% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: -1.30 vs. MOG.A: 7.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MOG.A' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.5  Med: -2.2 Max: 7.5
Current: 7.5
-9.5
7.5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 17.40
MOG.A's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
95% of the 146 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.72 vs. MOG.A: 17.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
MOG.A' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 5.46 Max: 32.93
Current: 17.4
0.35
32.93
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.01
MOG.A's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
76% of the 102 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.73 vs. MOG.A: 1.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
MOG.A' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 1.29 Max: 22.47
Current: 1.01
0.47
22.47
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 1.72
MOG.A's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked higher than
61% of the 33 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.78 vs. MOG.A: 1.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.12
MOG.A's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
54% of the 154 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. MOG.A: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
MOG.A' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.72 Max: 1.38
Current: 1.12
0.12
1.38
Price-to-Graham-Number 3.84
MOG.A's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
77% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.90 vs. MOG.A: 3.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
MOG.A' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 1.89 Max: 4.95
Current: 3.84
0.4
4.95
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 6.76
MOG.A's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
63% of the 290 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 6.08 vs. MOG.A: 6.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
MOG.A' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.9  Med: 7.6 Max: 12.7
Current: 6.76
4.9
12.7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 9.37
MOG.A's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
60% of the 114 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 6.20 vs. MOG.A: 9.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
MOG.A' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7  Med: 10.2 Max: 19.5
Current: 9.37
7
19.5

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $2,433
EPS (TTM) $ 3.61
Beta1.81
Short Percentage of Float0.84%
52-Week Range $45.77 - 73.05
Shares Outstanding (Mil)35.87

Analyst Estimate

Sep17 Sep18 Sep19
Revenue (Mil $) 2,424 2,542 2,665
EPS ($) 3.70 4.25 4.90
EPS without NRI ($) 3.70 4.25 4.90
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for MOG.A

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
BD Announces Appointment Of Tom Polen As President Apr 23 2017 
BD To Acquire Bard For $24 Billion Apr 23 2017 
Megaport Launches Global Cloud Collaboration With Oracle Apr 23 2017 
comScore Announces Official Worldwide Box Office Results for Weekend of April 23, 2017 Apr 23 2017 
Act Now - Shareholder Alert: Monteverde & Associates PC Announces An Investigation Of Exar Corporati Apr 23 2017 
Philips introduces new teleICU enterprise software at ATA 2017, delivering seamless population healt Apr 23 2017 
Dave and Buster’s Is a Growth Stock Apr 23 2017 
Harmonic Pushes OTT QoE to New Heights at the 2017 NAB Show Apr 22 2017 
PCCW Global Delivers Immersive 360-Degree, VR Sports Experience With Harmonic Apr 22 2017 
Harmonic Brings Market-Leading Playout Capabilities to VOS™ Cloud and VOS 360 Solutions Apr 22 2017 

More From Other Websites
Moog Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2017 Earnings Webcast Apr 21 2017
Moog, Inc. – Value Analysis (NYSE:MOG.A) : April 17, 2017 Apr 17 2017
Moog, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : MOG.A-US : April 13, 2017 Apr 13 2017
USITC to probe alleged patent infringement on intravascular parts Apr 11 2017
Moog, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : MOG.A-US : March 31, 2017 Mar 31 2017
Moog, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : MOG.A-US : February 27, 2017 Feb 27 2017
Moog Inc. Announces Acquisition Feb 17 2017
Moog, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : MOG.A-US : February 6, 2017 Feb 06 2017
Moog to Present at Cowen & Company Aerospace and Defense Conference on February 8, 2017 Feb 03 2017
ETFs with exposure to Moog, Inc. : February 2, 2017 Feb 02 2017
Moog, Inc. :MOG.A-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : January 30, 2017 Jan 30 2017
Edited Transcript of MOG.A earnings conference call or presentation 27-Jan-17 3:00pm GMT Jan 27 2017
Moog posts 1Q profit Jan 27 2017
Moog Reports First Quarter Results Jan 27 2017
ETFs with exposure to Moog, Inc. : January 20, 2017 Jan 20 2017
Moog, Inc. – Value Analysis (NYSE:MOG.A) : January 5, 2017 Jan 05 2017
Moog, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : MOG.A-US : January 4, 2017 Jan 04 2017
Is Moog Inc (MOG.A) A Good Stock To Buy? Dec 08 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)