Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 6.53
MTSC's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
69% of the 2254 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.44 vs. MTSC: 6.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
MTSC' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 2.49 Max: 674.97
Current: 6.53
0.11
674.97
Equity to Asset 0.62
MTSC's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
60% of the 2202 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 0.57 vs. MTSC: 0.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
MTSC' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46  Med: 0.52 Max: 0.62
Current: 0.62
0.46
0.62
Interest Coverage 38.88
MTSC's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
53% of the 1770 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 51.93 vs. MTSC: 38.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
MTSC' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.15  Med: 57.04 Max: 239.39
Current: 38.88
12.15
239.39
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 4.25
M-Score: -2.90
WACC vs ROIC
9.09%
13.52%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 6.94
MTSC's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
67% of the 2239 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 3.49 vs. MTSC: 6.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
MTSC' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.01  Med: 13.29 Max: 15.66
Current: 6.94
6.01
15.66
Net-margin (%) 5.37
MTSC's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
65% of the 2238 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 2.80 vs. MTSC: 5.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
MTSC' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.25  Med: 9.71 Max: 10.9
Current: 5.37
4.25
10.9
ROE (%) 10.92
MTSC's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 2207 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 5.57 vs. MTSC: 10.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
MTSC' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.51  Med: 22.69 Max: 27.03
Current: 10.92
8.51
27.03
ROA (%) 6.07
MTSC's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 2265 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 2.84 vs. MTSC: 6.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
MTSC' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.43  Med: 11.98 Max: 13.43
Current: 6.07
4.43
13.43
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 19.28
MTSC's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
69% of the 2259 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 9.92 vs. MTSC: 19.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
MTSC' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 26.53  Med: 56.03 Max: 94.3
Current: 19.28
26.53
94.3
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 3.40
MTSC's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
56% of the 2022 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.80 vs. MTSC: 3.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MTSC' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7  Med: 5.8 Max: 16.2
Current: 3.4
-7
16.2
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -2.40
MTSC's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
65% of the 1614 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 6.20 vs. MTSC: -2.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MTSC' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.7  Med: 7.3 Max: 37.4
Current: -2.4
-15.7
37.4
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -2.20
MTSC's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
61% of the 1444 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 6.20 vs. MTSC: -2.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MTSC' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -45.5  Med: 14.5 Max: 75.2
Current: -2.2
-45.5
75.2
» MTSC's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-12-03)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2015

MTSC Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Joel Greenblatt 100,779 sh (New)
Jim Simons 348,300 sh (+15.91%)
John Rogers 1,565,669 sh (+0.09%)
Mairs and Power 1,555,611 sh (+0.06%)
Chuck Royce 408,667 sh (-13.12%)
» More
Q4 2015

MTSC Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Joel Greenblatt 115,627 sh (+14.73%)
Jim Simons 383,000 sh (+9.96%)
John Rogers 1,574,515 sh (+0.56%)
Mairs and Power 1,536,183 sh (-1.25%)
Chuck Royce 384,867 sh (-5.82%)
» More
Q1 2016

MTSC Guru Trades in Q1 2016

John Hussman 2,250 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 11,500 sh (New)
Jim Simons 393,800 sh (+2.82%)
John Rogers 1,603,170 sh (+1.82%)
Chuck Royce 325,574 sh (-15.41%)
Mairs and Power 1,277,076 sh (-16.87%)
Joel Greenblatt 40,638 sh (-64.85%)
» More
Q2 2016

MTSC Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 32,233 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 21,486 sh (+86.83%)
Jim Simons 430,818 sh (+9.40%)
John Rogers 1,627,547 sh (+1.52%)
John Hussman 2,250 sh (unchged)
Mairs and Power 1,193,346 sh (-6.56%)
Joel Greenblatt 36,456 sh (-10.29%)
Chuck Royce 68,774 sh (-78.88%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MTSC

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Computer Hardware » Scientific & Technical Instruments
Compare:NAS:NEWP, NAS:RSTI, NYSE:BMI, NAS:NOVT, NAS:FARO, NYSE:RTEC, NYSE:ESE, OTCPK:SILLF, OTCPK:VAIAF, OTCPK:CAZGF, NYSE:LDR, NAS:IIVI, OTCPK:GGRGF, NAS:ORBK, NAS:ASEI, OTCPK:PPEHF, NYSE:VPG, NAS:HURC, NAS:CYBE, NAS:ABIL » details
Traded in other countries:MT7.Germany,
MTS Systems Corp is a supplier of test systems and position sensors. Its operations are organized and managed in two business segments; the Test segment and the Sensors segment.

MTS Systems Corp was incorporated under the Minnesota law in 1966. The Company is a supplier of test systems and position sensors. Its operations are organized and managed in two business segments, the Test segment and the Sensors segment. The Test segment (Test) provides testing solutions including hardware, software and service. Its testing solutions are used by customers in their development of new products to characterize the product's mechanical properties. Its solutions simulate forces and motions that these customers expect their products to encounter in use. Mechanical testing in a lab setting is an accepted method to accelerate product development compared to reliance on full physical prototypes in real-world settings, proving ground testing and virtual testing because it provides more controlled simulation and accurate measurement. The need for mechanical simulation increases in proportion to the cost of a product, the range and complexity of the physical environment in which the product will be used, expected warranty or recall risk and expense, governmental regulation and potential legal liability. Because a portion of the products in Test is considered by its customers to be capital expenditures, the timing of purchases may be impacted by interest rates, customer capital spending, and product development cycles. A typical test system includes a reaction frame to hold the prototype specimen, a hydraulic pump or electro-mechanical power source, piston actuators to create the force or motion, and a computer controller with specialized software to coordinate the actuator movement and record and manipulate results. Lower force and less dynamic testing can usually be accomplished with electro-mechanical power sources, which are generally less expensive than hydraulic systems. Higher force and more dynamic testing typically require hydraulically powered systems, which are usually more expensive. In addition to these basic components, Test sells a variety of accessories and spare parts, as well as services, including installation, calibration, maintenance, training and consulting. The Sensors segment (Sensors) products are used by industrial machinery and mobile equipment manufacturers to automate the operation of their products for improved safety and end-user productivity. Examples of customer industries include manufacturers of plastic injection molding machines, steel mills, fluid power, oil and gas, medical, wood product processing equipment, mobile equipment, and energy. Its products are also used to measure fluid displacement, such as liquid levels for customers in the process industries. Sensors manufactures products utilizing magnetostriction technology. It has developed a technology, known as Temposonics. This technology offers high speed and precise non-contact position sensing and is ideal for use in harsh operating environments. The Company's manufacturing operations and past and present ownership and operations

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 24.44
MTSC's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
61% of the 1583 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 17.77 vs. MTSC: 24.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
MTSC' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.83  Med: 19.25 Max: 71.4
Current: 24.44
7.83
71.4
PE(NRI) 24.44
MTSC's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
61% of the 1586 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 17.70 vs. MTSC: 24.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
MTSC' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.15  Med: 19.35 Max: 71.4
Current: 24.44
8.15
71.4
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 16.32
MTSC's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked higher than
50% of the 1103 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 16.15 vs. MTSC: 16.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
MTSC' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.79  Med: 21.41 Max: 66.02
Current: 16.32
8.79
66.02
P/B 1.82
MTSC's P/B is ranked lower than
57% of the 2165 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. MTSC: 1.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
MTSC' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.55  Med: 3.5 Max: 5.85
Current: 1.82
1.55
5.85
P/S 1.31
MTSC's P/S is ranked lower than
60% of the 2207 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. MTSC: 1.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
MTSC' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.61 Max: 2.53
Current: 1.31
0.76
2.53
PFCF 14.36
MTSC's PFCF is ranked higher than
51% of the 968 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 14.23 vs. MTSC: 14.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
MTSC' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.28  Med: 21.4 Max: 165.59
Current: 14.36
8.28
165.59
POCF 10.14
MTSC's POCF is ranked lower than
51% of the 1167 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 9.77 vs. MTSC: 10.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
MTSC' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.68  Med: 15.54 Max: 70.31
Current: 10.14
6.68
70.31
EV-to-EBIT 17.16
MTSC's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
58% of the 1607 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 13.38 vs. MTSC: 17.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MTSC' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.4  Med: 12.1 Max: 37.1
Current: 17.16
4.4
37.1
EV-to-EBITDA 11.45
MTSC's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
54% of the 1764 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 10.07 vs. MTSC: 11.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MTSC' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.9  Med: 9.95 Max: 17.7
Current: 11.45
3.9
17.7
PEG 2.18
MTSC's PEG is ranked lower than
59% of the 730 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.64 vs. MTSC: 2.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
MTSC' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.37 Max: 62.16
Current: 2.18
0.54
62.16
Shiller P/E 18.20
MTSC's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
72% of the 336 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 28.35 vs. MTSC: 18.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
MTSC' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.33  Med: 23.87 Max: 39.41
Current: 18.2
14.33
39.41
Current Ratio 2.59
MTSC's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 2186 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.94 vs. MTSC: 2.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MTSC' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.51  Med: 1.96 Max: 2.59
Current: 2.59
1.51
2.59
Quick Ratio 2.12
MTSC's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
70% of the 2186 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.46 vs. MTSC: 2.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MTSC' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.04  Med: 1.49 Max: 2.14
Current: 2.12
1.04
2.14
Days Inventory 90.35
MTSC's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
62% of the 2183 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 73.19 vs. MTSC: 90.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
MTSC' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 59.77  Med: 79.41 Max: 90.35
Current: 90.35
59.77
90.35
Days Sales Outstanding 52.81
MTSC's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
71% of the 1867 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 71.64 vs. MTSC: 52.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MTSC' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 52.81  Med: 66.73 Max: 114.41
Current: 52.81
52.81
114.41
Days Payable 37.24
MTSC's Days Payable is ranked lower than
69% of the 1806 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 54.39 vs. MTSC: 37.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
MTSC' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 26.43  Med: 34.74 Max: 40.24
Current: 37.24
26.43
40.24

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 2.40
MTSC's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
52% of the 1733 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 2.34 vs. MTSC: 2.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
MTSC' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.79  Med: 1.79 Max: 2.88
Current: 2.4
0.79
2.88
Dividend Payout 0.58
MTSC's Dividend Payout is ranked lower than
66% of the 1186 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 0.39 vs. MTSC: 0.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
MTSC' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.27 Max: 6
Current: 0.58
0.14
6
Dividend Growth (3y) 4.60
MTSC's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked lower than
54% of the 1008 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. MTSC: 4.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
MTSC' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 12.2 Max: 32.6
Current: 4.6
0
32.6
Forward Dividend Yield 2.40
MTSC's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
51% of the 1671 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 2.47 vs. MTSC: 2.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 4.66
MTSC's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
68% of the 2117 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 2.63 vs. MTSC: 4.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
MTSC' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.53  Med: 3.48 Max: 5.59
Current: 4.66
1.53
5.59
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 1.50
MTSC's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 1303 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: -2.00 vs. MTSC: 1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MTSC' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.4  Med: 2.1 Max: 4.8
Current: 1.5
-4.4
4.8

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 2.74
MTSC's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked higher than
60% of the 1601 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 3.54 vs. MTSC: 2.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
MTSC' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.15  Med: 4.97 Max: 9.91
Current: 2.74
2.15
9.91
Price/Tangible Book 2.06
MTSC's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
57% of the 2108 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.65 vs. MTSC: 2.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
MTSC' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.83  Med: 2.95 Max: 5.65
Current: 2.06
0.83
5.65
Price/Projected FCF 1.21
MTSC's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
52% of the 1314 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. MTSC: 1.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
MTSC' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.32 Max: 2.8
Current: 1.21
0.54
2.8
Price/Median PS Value 0.81
MTSC's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
80% of the 2079 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.10 vs. MTSC: 0.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
MTSC' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.83 Max: 1.37
Current: 0.81
0.21
1.37
Price/Graham Number 1.50
MTSC's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
59% of the 1449 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. MTSC: 1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
MTSC' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.59 Max: 3.19
Current: 1.5
0.76
3.19
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 5.80
MTSC's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
58% of the 2225 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 4.10 vs. MTSC: 5.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
MTSC' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.7  Med: 8.3 Max: 22.7
Current: 5.8
2.7
22.7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 1.46
MTSC's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
62% of the 1176 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 6.63 vs. MTSC: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
MTSC' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.9  Med: 16.65 Max: 29.8
Current: 1.46
-4.9
29.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $578.8
EPS (TTM) $ 2.05
Beta1.06
Short Percentage of Float12.80%
52-Week Range $41.68 - 68.28
Shares Outstanding (Mil)16.67
» More Articles for NAS:MTSC

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
John Rogers Expands Stake in MTS Systems Apr 13 2015 
Respected Value Investor John Rogers Of The Ariel Fund Shares His Top Three Picks For 2015 Jan 15 2015 
October 2014 Value Idea Contest Announcement Nov 20 2014 
MTS Systems: Small Cap with Income and Big Prospects Oct 31 2014 
John Rogers Comments on MTS Systems Corp. Nov 05 2013 
Buffett-Munger Sweet Spot in Small Cap Tech Stocks – Second Quarter Trades Aug 11 2013 
John Rogers Comments on MTS Systems Corp. Jul 25 2013 
John Rogers' May Commentary - What's Attractive and New Buys Jun 13 2013 
Mairs & Power Q3 Commentary Nov 15 2012 
5 Dividend Stocks Building Future Yield Aug 29 2011 

More From Other Websites
MTS Rolling Road System Model Brings Inspiration To Future Engineers At Minnesota State Fair Aug 25 2016
MTS SYSTEMS CORP Financials Aug 17 2016
Coverage initiated on MTS Systems by Wells Fargo Aug 17 2016
ETF’s with exposure to MTS Systems Corp. : August 16, 2016 Aug 16 2016
MTS Systems Corp. :MTSC-US: Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2016 By the Numbers : August 12, 2016 Aug 12 2016
MTS Systems to Present at InvestMNt 2016 Conference Aug 11 2016
Edited Transcript of MTSC earnings conference call or presentation 9-Aug-16 2:00pm GMT Aug 09 2016
MTS posts 3Q profit Aug 08 2016
MTS posts 3Q profit Aug 08 2016
8 August, 2016 MTS Reports Fiscal 2016 Third Quarter Financial Results Aug 08 2016
MTS SYSTEMS CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial... Aug 08 2016
MTS Reports Fiscal 2016 Third Quarter Financial Results Aug 08 2016
Q3 2016 MTS Systems Corp Earnings Release - After Market Close Aug 08 2016
MTS SYSTEMS CORP Files SEC form 8-K/A, Financial Statements and Exhibits Aug 05 2016
3 August, 2016 MTS Systems Honored by Wichita State University for Support of National Institute for... Aug 03 2016
MTS Systems Honored By Wichita State University For Support Of National Institute For Aviation... Aug 03 2016
MTS SYSTEMS CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a... Aug 01 2016
28 July, 2016 MTS Announces Declaration of Quarterly Cash Dividend Jul 28 2016
MTS Announces Declaration of Quarterly Cash Dividend Jul 28 2016
27 July, 2016 MTS Systems to Present at J.P. Morgan Auto Conference Jul 27 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)