Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 2.96
MTSC's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
61% of the 2244 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.45 vs. MTSC: 2.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
MTSC' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 2.45 Max: 674.97
Current: 2.96
0.11
674.97
Equity to Asset 0.51
MTSC's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
60% of the 2216 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. MTSC: 0.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
MTSC' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46  Med: 0.52 Max: 0.61
Current: 0.51
0.46
0.61
Interest Coverage 24.84
MTSC's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
51% of the 1488 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 23.45 vs. MTSC: 24.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
MTSC' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.15  Med: 57.04 Max: 239.39
Current: 24.84
12.15
239.39
F-Score: 6
Z-Score: 4.14
M-Score: -3.24
WACC vs ROIC
9.27%
15.28%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 8.27
MTSC's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
72% of the 2229 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 3.44 vs. MTSC: 8.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
MTSC' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.01  Med: 13.30 Max: 15.66
Current: 8.27
6.01
15.66
Net-margin (%) 6.26
MTSC's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
70% of the 2230 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 2.72 vs. MTSC: 6.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
MTSC' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.25  Med: 9.71 Max: 10.9
Current: 6.26
4.25
10.9
ROE (%) 13.72
MTSC's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
79% of the 2199 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 5.51 vs. MTSC: 13.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
MTSC' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.51  Med: 22.69 Max: 27.03
Current: 13.72
8.51
27.03
ROA (%) 7.23
MTSC's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
78% of the 2253 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 2.84 vs. MTSC: 7.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
MTSC' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.43  Med: 11.98 Max: 13.43
Current: 7.23
4.43
13.43
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 22.21
MTSC's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
74% of the 2246 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 9.98 vs. MTSC: 22.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
MTSC' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 26.53  Med: 56.42 Max: 94.3
Current: 22.21
26.53
94.3
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 3.40
MTSC's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
56% of the 2021 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.70 vs. MTSC: 3.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MTSC' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.7  Med: 4.70 Max: 16.2
Current: 3.4
-4.7
16.2
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -2.40
MTSC's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
62% of the 1609 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 4.30 vs. MTSC: -2.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MTSC' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.8  Med: 8.40 Max: 37.5
Current: -2.4
-16.8
37.5
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -2.20
MTSC's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
61% of the 1448 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 5.90 vs. MTSC: -2.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
MTSC' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -46.4  Med: 12.50 Max: 80.5
Current: -2.2
-46.4
80.5
» MTSC's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-08-04)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

MTSC Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Jim Simons 300,500 sh (+7.40%)
John Rogers 1,564,300 sh (+0.21%)
Mairs and Power 1,554,735 sh (-6.05%)
Chuck Royce 470,367 sh (-7.95%)
» More
Q3 2015

MTSC Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Joel Greenblatt 100,779 sh (New)
Jim Simons 348,300 sh (+15.91%)
John Rogers 1,565,669 sh (+0.09%)
Mairs and Power 1,555,611 sh (+0.06%)
Chuck Royce 408,667 sh (-13.12%)
» More
Q4 2015

MTSC Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Joel Greenblatt 115,627 sh (+14.73%)
Jim Simons 383,000 sh (+9.96%)
John Rogers 1,574,515 sh (+0.56%)
Mairs and Power 1,536,183 sh (-1.25%)
Chuck Royce 384,867 sh (-5.82%)
» More
Q1 2016

MTSC Guru Trades in Q1 2016

John Hussman 2,250 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 11,500 sh (New)
Jim Simons 393,800 sh (+2.82%)
John Rogers 1,603,170 sh (+1.82%)
Chuck Royce 325,574 sh (-15.41%)
Mairs and Power 1,277,076 sh (-16.87%)
Joel Greenblatt 40,638 sh (-64.85%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MTSC

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Computer Hardware » Scientific & Technical Instruments
Compare:NAS:FARO, NAS:NOVT, NYSE:RTEC, NAS:NEWP, OTCPK:SILLF, NAS:RSTI, NYSE:LDR, OTCPK:CAZGF, NYSE:BMI, OTCPK:GGRGF, NYSE:ESE, NAS:ASEI, OTCPK:PPEHF, NAS:HURC, NAS:ORBK, NYSE:VPG, NAS:IIVI, NAS:CYBE, NAS:ABIL, OTCPK:OPSSF » details
Traded in other countries:MT7.Germany,
MTS Systems Corp is a supplier of test systems and position sensors. Its operations are organized and managed in two business segments; the Test segment and the Sensors segment.

MTS Systems Corp was incorporated under the Minnesota law in 1966. The Company is a supplier of test systems and position sensors. Its operations are organized and managed in two business segments, the Test segment and the Sensors segment. The Test segment (Test) provides testing solutions including hardware, software and service. Its testing solutions are used by customers in their development of new products to characterize the product's mechanical properties. Its solutions simulate forces and motions that these customers expect their products to encounter in use. Mechanical testing in a lab setting is an accepted method to accelerate product development compared to reliance on full physical prototypes in real-world settings, proving ground testing and virtual testing because it provides more controlled simulation and accurate measurement. The need for mechanical simulation increases in proportion to the cost of a product, the range and complexity of the physical environment in which the product will be used, expected warranty or recall risk and expense, governmental regulation and potential legal liability. Because a portion of the products in Test is considered by its customers to be capital expenditures, the timing of purchases may be impacted by interest rates, customer capital spending, and product development cycles. A typical test system includes a reaction frame to hold the prototype specimen, a hydraulic pump or electro-mechanical power source, piston actuators to create the force or motion, and a computer controller with specialized software to coordinate the actuator movement and record and manipulate results. Lower force and less dynamic testing can usually be accomplished with electro-mechanical power sources, which are generally less expensive than hydraulic systems. Higher force and more dynamic testing typically require hydraulically powered systems, which are usually more expensive. In addition to these basic components, Test sells a variety of accessories and spare parts, as well as services, including installation, calibration, maintenance, training and consulting. The Sensors segment (Sensors) products are used by industrial machinery and mobile equipment manufacturers to automate the operation of their products for improved safety and end-user productivity. Examples of customer industries include manufacturers of plastic injection molding machines, steel mills, fluid power, oil and gas, medical, wood product processing equipment, mobile equipment, and energy. Its products are also used to measure fluid displacement, such as liquid levels for customers in the process industries. Sensors manufactures products utilizing magnetostriction technology. It has developed a technology, known as Temposonics. This technology offers high speed and precise non-contact position sensing and is ideal for use in harsh operating environments. The Company's manufacturing operations and past and present ownership and operations

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 20.27
MTSC's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
54% of the 1675 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 18.31 vs. MTSC: 20.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
MTSC' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.83  Med: 19.15 Max: 71.4
Current: 20.27
7.83
71.4
PE(NRI) 20.27
MTSC's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
54% of the 1607 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 18.35 vs. MTSC: 20.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
MTSC' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.15  Med: 19.30 Max: 71.4
Current: 20.27
8.15
71.4
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 8.77
MTSC's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked higher than
71% of the 1102 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 15.87 vs. MTSC: 8.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
MTSC' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.99  Med: 21.65 Max: 66.02
Current: 8.77
7.99
66.02
P/B 2.74
MTSC's P/B is ranked lower than
71% of the 2304 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.53 vs. MTSC: 2.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
MTSC' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.67  Med: 3.50 Max: 5.85
Current: 2.74
1.67
5.85
P/S 1.25
MTSC's P/S is ranked lower than
58% of the 2300 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 0.96 vs. MTSC: 1.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
MTSC' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.62 Max: 2.53
Current: 1.25
0.76
2.53
PFCF 8.27
MTSC's PFCF is ranked higher than
71% of the 1015 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 13.83 vs. MTSC: 8.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
MTSC' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.53  Med: 21.49 Max: 165.59
Current: 8.27
7.53
165.59
POCF 6.65
MTSC's POCF is ranked higher than
66% of the 1233 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 9.56 vs. MTSC: 6.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
MTSC' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.07  Med: 15.68 Max: 70.31
Current: 6.65
6.07
70.31
EV-to-EBIT 14.15
MTSC's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
51% of the 1713 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 13.37 vs. MTSC: 14.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MTSC' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.4  Med: 12.10 Max: 37.1
Current: 14.15
4.4
37.1
EV-to-EBITDA 9.75
MTSC's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
51% of the 1851 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 9.94 vs. MTSC: 9.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MTSC' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.9  Med: 9.90 Max: 17.7
Current: 9.75
3.9
17.7
PEG 1.82
MTSC's PEG is ranked higher than
50% of the 745 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.82 vs. MTSC: 1.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
MTSC' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.55  Med: 1.39 Max: 62.16
Current: 1.82
0.55
62.16
Shiller P/E 16.91
MTSC's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
72% of the 335 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 28.15 vs. MTSC: 16.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
MTSC' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.33  Med: 24.00 Max: 43.08
Current: 16.91
14.33
43.08
Current Ratio 1.67
MTSC's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 2175 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.98 vs. MTSC: 1.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MTSC' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.51  Med: 1.96 Max: 2.5
Current: 1.67
1.51
2.5
Quick Ratio 1.23
MTSC's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 2175 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.51 vs. MTSC: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MTSC' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.04  Med: 1.49 Max: 2.14
Current: 1.23
1.04
2.14
Days Inventory 94.33
MTSC's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
64% of the 2171 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 72.87 vs. MTSC: 94.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
MTSC' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 59.77  Med: 79.41 Max: 90.03
Current: 94.33
59.77
90.03
Days Sales Outstanding 63.26
MTSC's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
58% of the 1882 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 69.35 vs. MTSC: 63.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MTSC' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 56.62  Med: 66.73 Max: 114.41
Current: 63.26
56.62
114.41
Days Payable 38.79
MTSC's Days Payable is ranked lower than
67% of the 1840 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 52.84 vs. MTSC: 38.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
MTSC' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 26.43  Med: 34.32 Max: 40.24
Current: 38.79
26.43
40.24

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 2.56
MTSC's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
54% of the 1748 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 2.24 vs. MTSC: 2.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
MTSC' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.79  Med: 1.79 Max: 2.88
Current: 2.56
0.79
2.88
Dividend Payout 0.52
MTSC's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
91% of the 1219 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. MTSC: 0.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
MTSC' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.27 Max: 6
Current: 0.52
0.14
6
Dividend Growth (3y) 4.60
MTSC's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked lower than
54% of the 1011 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. MTSC: 4.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
MTSC' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 12.20 Max: 32.6
Current: 4.6
0
32.6
Forward Dividend Yield 2.56
MTSC's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
51% of the 1644 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 2.55 vs. MTSC: 2.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 4.99
MTSC's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
71% of the 2109 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 2.73 vs. MTSC: 4.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
MTSC' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.53  Med: 3.48 Max: 5.59
Current: 4.99
1.53
5.59
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 1.50
MTSC's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 1298 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: -2.00 vs. MTSC: 1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MTSC' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.4  Med: 2.10 Max: 4.8
Current: 1.5
-4.4
4.8

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 5.95
MTSC's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
64% of the 1778 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 3.63 vs. MTSC: 5.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
MTSC' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.15  Med: 4.97 Max: 9.91
Current: 5.95
2.15
9.91
Price/Tangible Book 3.37
MTSC's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
72% of the 2264 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.64 vs. MTSC: 3.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
MTSC' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.83  Med: 2.95 Max: 5.65
Current: 3.37
0.83
5.65
Price/Projected FCF 1.15
MTSC's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
50% of the 1414 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. MTSC: 1.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
MTSC' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.33 Max: 2.8
Current: 1.15
0.54
2.8
Price/Median PS Value 0.78
MTSC's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
82% of the 2257 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. MTSC: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
MTSC' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.82 Max: 1.36
Current: 0.78
0.21
1.36
Price/Graham Number 1.74
MTSC's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
64% of the 1593 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 1.18 vs. MTSC: 1.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
MTSC' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.59 Max: 3.19
Current: 1.74
0.76
3.19
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 7.14
MTSC's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
63% of the 2371 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 4.20 vs. MTSC: 7.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
MTSC' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.7  Med: 8.30 Max: 22.7
Current: 7.14
2.7
22.7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 5.87
MTSC's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
51% of the 1171 Companies
in the Global Scientific & Technical Instruments industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. MTSC: 5.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
MTSC' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.9  Med: 16.70 Max: 29.8
Current: 5.87
-4.9
29.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $555.0
EPS (TTM) $ 2.31
Beta1.10
Short Percentage of Float10.19%
52-Week Range $41.68 - 68.28
Shares Outstanding (Mil)14.75
» More Articles for NAS:MTSC

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
John Rogers Expands Stake in MTS Systems Apr 13 2015 
Respected Value Investor John Rogers Of The Ariel Fund Shares His Top Three Picks For 2015 Jan 15 2015 
October 2014 Value Idea Contest Announcement Nov 20 2014 
MTS Systems: Small Cap with Income and Big Prospects Oct 31 2014 
John Rogers Comments on MTS Systems Corp. Nov 05 2013 
Buffett-Munger Sweet Spot in Small Cap Tech Stocks – Second Quarter Trades Aug 11 2013 
John Rogers Comments on MTS Systems Corp. Jul 25 2013 
John Rogers' May Commentary - What's Attractive and New Buys Jun 13 2013 
Mairs & Power Q3 Commentary Nov 15 2012 
5 Dividend Stocks Building Future Yield Aug 29 2011 

More From Other Websites
25 July, 2016 MTS Announces Third Quarter 2016 Earnings Release and Conference Call Jul 25 2016
MTS Announces Third Quarter 2016 Earnings Release Date and Conference Call Jul 25 2016
MTS Flat-Trac® Rolling Road System Chosen By Leading Chinese Research Institute For... Jul 19 2016
13 July, 2016 MTS and University of Minnesota Deliver Driver Assistance Technology for 'Bus on... Jul 13 2016
MTS And University of Minnesota Deliver Driver Assistance Technology For 'Bus on Shoulder'... Jul 13 2016
MTS SYSTEMS CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Termination of a... Jul 07 2016
5 July, 2016 MTS Completes Acquisition of Sensor Producer PCB Group, Inc. Jul 05 2016
MTS Completes Acquisition Of Sensor Producer PCB Group, Inc. Jul 05 2016
Coverage initiated on MTS Systems by JP Morgan Jun 23 2016
MTS SYSTEMS CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a... Jun 21 2016
17 June, 2016 MTS Sells 150,000 Additional 8.75% Tangible Equity Units Pursuant to Underwriters'... Jun 17 2016
MTS Sells 150,000 Additional 8.75% Tangible Equity Units Pursuant To Underwriters' Over-Allotment... Jun 17 2016
MTS SYSTEMS CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a... Jun 15 2016
MTS SYSTEMS CORP Financials Jun 15 2016
MTS Sells 247,500 Additional Shares Of Common Stock Pursuant To Underwriters' Over-Allotment Option Jun 14 2016
MTS SYSTEMS CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Financial... Jun 14 2016
9 June, 2016 MTS Announces Upsize and Pricing of Public Offering of Common Stock and Pricing of... Jun 09 2016
MTS Announces Upsize And Pricing Of Public Offering Of Common Stock And Pricing Of Public Offering... Jun 09 2016
7 June, 2016 MTS Announces Proposed Public Offering of Common Stock and Tangible Equity Units Jun 07 2016
MTS Announces Proposed Public Offering Of Common Stock And Tangible Equity Units Jun 07 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)