Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.19
NAT's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
64% of the 796 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 0.35 vs. NAT: 0.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
NAT' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 9999.00 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.19
Equity to Asset 0.76
NAT's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
89% of the 790 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 0.45 vs. NAT: 0.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
NAT' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 0.78 Max: 1
Current: 0.76
0.73
1
Interest Coverage 9.17
NAT's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
51% of the 552 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 8.94 vs. NAT: 9.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NAT' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 8.45 Max: 35.76
Current: 9.17
0.39
35.76
F-Score: 8
Z-Score: 3.03
M-Score: -2.31
WACC vs ROIC
9.55%
9.21%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 38.38
NAT's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 788 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 6.23 vs. NAT: 38.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
NAT' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -75.13  Med: 1.28 Max: 53.2
Current: 38.38
-75.13
53.2
Net-margin (%) 33.83
NAT's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 794 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 4.47 vs. NAT: 33.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
NAT' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -76.27  Med: 0.09 Max: 52.12
Current: 33.83
-76.27
52.12
ROE (%) 9.62
NAT's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 782 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 7.07 vs. NAT: 9.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
NAT' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.67  Med: 0.02 Max: 16.27
Current: 9.62
-12.67
16.27
ROA (%) 7.30
NAT's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
82% of the 805 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 3.05 vs. NAT: 7.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
NAT' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.49  Med: 0.02 Max: 14.69
Current: 7.3
-9.49
14.69
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 10.00
NAT's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
53% of the 785 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 9.23 vs. NAT: 10.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
NAT' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.72  Med: 0.19 Max: 16.04
Current: 10
-9.72
16.04
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 26.90
NAT's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
96% of the 680 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 2.70 vs. NAT: 26.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NAT' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33.8  Med: 7.00 Max: 103.1
Current: 26.9
-33.8
103.1
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -53.90
NAT's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
95% of the 502 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 4.50 vs. NAT: -53.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NAT' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -80  Med: 10.70 Max: 359.1
Current: -53.9
-80
359.1
» NAT's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2015

NAT Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Steven Cohen 616,423 sh (New)
George Soros 19,660 sh (New)
Jim Simons 633,150 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 52,909 sh (+250.55%)
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Donald Smith 807,388 sh (-50.58%)
» More
Q2 2015

NAT Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Jim Simons 2,025,314 sh (+219.88%)
Paul Tudor Jones 56,786 sh (+7.33%)
George Soros Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Donald Smith Sold Out
» More
Q3 2015

NAT Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Joel Greenblatt 75,145 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 118,754 sh (+109.13%)
Jim Simons 840,400 sh (-58.51%)
» More
Q4 2015

NAT Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons 32,900 sh (-96.09%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK