Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.09
NAT's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
82% of the 818 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 0.38 vs. NAT: 0.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
NAT' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 9999.00 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.09
Equity to Asset 0.71
NAT's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
86% of the 816 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 0.46 vs. NAT: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
NAT' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 0.78 Max: 1
Current: 0.71
0.73
1
Interest Coverage 11.80
NAT's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
64% of the 619 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 6.53 vs. NAT: 11.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NAT' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 8.45 Max: 35.76
Current: 11.8
0.39
35.76
F-Score: 8
Z-Score: 3.51
M-Score: -2.31
WACC vs ROIC
9.51%
11.89%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 28.74
NAT's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
84% of the 813 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 6.37 vs. NAT: 28.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
NAT' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -75.13  Med: 1.28 Max: 53.2
Current: 28.74
-75.13
53.2
Net-margin (%) 26.29
NAT's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
88% of the 820 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 4.12 vs. NAT: 26.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
NAT' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -76.27  Med: 0.09 Max: 52.12
Current: 26.29
-76.27
52.12
ROE (%) 13.26
NAT's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
74% of the 809 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 7.03 vs. NAT: 13.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
NAT' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.67  Med: 0.02 Max: 16.27
Current: 13.26
-12.67
16.27
ROA (%) 9.90
NAT's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
89% of the 830 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 3.08 vs. NAT: 9.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
NAT' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.49  Med: 0.02 Max: 14.69
Current: 9.9
-9.49
14.69
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 13.48
NAT's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 809 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 9.59 vs. NAT: 13.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
NAT' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.72  Med: 0.19 Max: 16.04
Current: 13.48
-9.72
16.04
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 26.90
NAT's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
96% of the 698 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. NAT: 26.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NAT' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33.9  Med: 6.90 Max: 103.5
Current: 26.9
-33.9
103.5
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -53.50
NAT's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
95% of the 518 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 4.70 vs. NAT: -53.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NAT' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -80  Med: 10.70 Max: 359.1
Current: -53.5
-80
359.1
» NAT's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-05-11)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2015

NAT Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Steven Cohen 616,423 sh (New)
Jim Simons 633,150 sh (New)
George Soros 19,660 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 52,909 sh (+250.55%)
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Donald Smith 807,388 sh (-50.58%)
» More
Q2 2015

NAT Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Jim Simons 2,025,314 sh (+219.88%)
Paul Tudor Jones 56,786 sh (+7.33%)
George Soros Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Donald Smith Sold Out
» More
Q3 2015

NAT Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Joel Greenblatt 75,145 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 118,754 sh (+109.13%)
Jim Simons 840,400 sh (-58.51%)
» More
Q4 2015

NAT Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones 70,777 sh (-40.40%)
Jim Simons 32,900 sh (-96.09%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NAT

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 11.49
NAT's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
64% of the 657 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 15.66 vs. NAT: 11.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
NAT' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.06  Med: 14.94 Max: 420.89
Current: 11.49
7.06
420.89
Forward P/E 11.75
NAT's Forward P/E is ranked higher than
56% of the 143 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 13.19 vs. NAT: 11.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 11.49
NAT's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
65% of the 657 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 15.82 vs. NAT: 11.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
NAT' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.05  Med: 14.92 Max: 475
Current: 11.49
7.05
475
P/B 1.54
NAT's P/B is ranked lower than
63% of the 798 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. NAT: 1.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
NAT' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.51  Med: 1.28 Max: 2.21
Current: 1.54
0.51
2.21
P/S 5.31
NAT's P/S is ranked lower than
91% of the 792 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. NAT: 5.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
NAT' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.58  Med: 5.05 Max: 11.31
Current: 5.31
1.58
11.31
PFCF 47.11
NAT's PFCF is ranked lower than
87% of the 305 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 14.40 vs. NAT: 47.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
NAT' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.73  Med: 30.82 Max: 335.38
Current: 47.11
6.73
335.38
POCF 8.04
NAT's POCF is ranked lower than
59% of the 483 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 6.74 vs. NAT: 8.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
NAT' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.63  Med: 11.75 Max: 1150
Current: 8.04
5.63
1150
EV-to-EBIT 16.19
NAT's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
62% of the 651 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 13.31 vs. NAT: 16.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
NAT' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2022.6  Med: 8.90 Max: 1667.1
Current: 16.19
-2022.6
1667.1
EV-to-EBITDA 8.76
NAT's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
54% of the 689 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 9.53 vs. NAT: 8.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
NAT' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -359.9  Med: 12.70 Max: 358.7
Current: 8.76
-359.9
358.7
Shiller P/E 21.88
NAT's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
56% of the 191 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 20.43 vs. NAT: 21.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
NAT' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.27  Med: 10.52 Max: 23.66
Current: 21.88
4.27
23.66
Current Ratio 7.11
NAT's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
97% of the 786 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 1.22 vs. NAT: 7.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
NAT' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 9.34 Max: 278.8
Current: 7.11
0.28
278.8
Quick Ratio 4.92
NAT's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
95% of the 786 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. NAT: 4.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
NAT' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 8.90 Max: 278.8
Current: 4.92
0.28
278.8
Days Inventory 76.28
NAT's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
88% of the 635 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 12.74 vs. NAT: 76.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
NAT' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 19.84  Med: 26.92 Max: 63.43
Current: 76.28
19.84
63.43
Days Sales Outstanding 22.93
NAT's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
73% of the 610 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 41.09 vs. NAT: 22.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
NAT' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.15  Med: 30.09 Max: 67.72
Current: 22.93
0.15
67.72
Days Payable 6.88
NAT's Days Payable is ranked lower than
91% of the 539 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 35.16 vs. NAT: 6.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
NAT' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.29  Med: 20.57 Max: 82.83
Current: 6.88
9.29
82.83

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 10.47
NAT's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
95% of the 873 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 2.67 vs. NAT: 10.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
NAT' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.87  Med: 9.48 Max: 21.31
Current: 10.47
4.87
21.31
Dividend Payout 1.07
NAT's Dividend Payout is ranked lower than
89% of the 543 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 0.38 vs. NAT: 1.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
NAT' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 1.94 Max: 1880
Current: 1.07
0.37
1880
Dividend Growth (3y) -19.10
NAT's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked lower than
78% of the 376 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. NAT: -19.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
NAT' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -37.8  Med: 0.00 Max: 104.3
Current: -19.1
-37.8
104.3
Forward Dividend Yield 11.26
NAT's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
95% of the 803 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 2.73 vs. NAT: 11.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 2.64
NAT's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
57% of the 971 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 3.65 vs. NAT: 2.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
NAT' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.23  Med: 2.39 Max: 5.37
Current: 2.64
1.23
5.37
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -21.90
NAT's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
88% of the 457 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: -1.20 vs. NAT: -21.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
NAT' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -41.1  Med: -12.80 Max: 6.4
Current: -21.9
-41.1
6.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 1.57
NAT's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
60% of the 749 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. NAT: 1.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
NAT' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.57  Med: 1.28 Max: 3.25
Current: 1.57
0.57
3.25
Price/Projected FCF 5.66
NAT's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
87% of the 365 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. NAT: 5.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
NAT' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.48  Med: 2.95 Max: 22.62
Current: 5.66
1.48
22.62
Price/Median PS Value 1.05
NAT's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
55% of the 715 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 1.01 vs. NAT: 1.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
NAT' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.32  Med: 1.12 Max: 2.21
Current: 1.05
0.32
2.21
Price/Graham Number 1.05
NAT's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
52% of the 549 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 1.01 vs. NAT: 1.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
NAT' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.52  Med: 0.94 Max: 5.08
Current: 1.05
0.52
5.08
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 6.20
NAT's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
50% of the 808 Companies
in the Global Shipping & Ports industry.

( Industry Median: 6.10 vs. NAT: 6.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
NAT' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 2.50 Max: 14.8
Current: 6.2
0.1
14.8

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $446
EPS $ 1.32
Beta1.13
Short Percentage of Float17.42%
52-Week Range $9.94 - 17.45
Shares Outstanding(Mil)89.18

Analyst Estimate

Dec16
Revenue(Mil)
EPS($) 1.30
EPS without NRI($) 1.30

Business Description

Industry: Transportation & Logistics » Shipping & Ports
Compare:XTER:HLAG, TSE:9104, SGX:N03, SZSE:000582, BSP:STBP11, HKSE:00316 » details
Traded in other countries:B3O.Germany,
Nordic American Tankers Ltd formerly Nordic American Tanker Shipping Limited was founded on June 12, 1995 under the laws of the Islands of Bermuda. The Company owns and operates double hull crude oil tankers. It is an international tanker company that owns approximately 24 double-hull Suezmax tankers, two of which are newbuildings that average approximately 156,000 dwt each. It currently operates 22 vessels in the spot market or on spot market-related charters pursuant to cooperative arrangements with third parties. The Company's fleet consists of 24 Suezmax crude oil tankers, and all of its 22 vessels are employed in the spot market. The Company has identified only one operating segment. The Company has only one type of vessel - Suezmax crude oil tankers. It operates in markets that are very competitive and based mainly on supply and demand. It competes for charters on the basis of price, vessel location, size, age and condition of the vessel, as well as on its reputation as an operator. It compete primarily with owners of tankers in the Suezmax class size. The Company is subject to various international conventions, laws and regulations in force in the countries in which its vessels may operate or are registered.
» More Articles for NAT

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Nordic American Tankers: Correction Presents Good Buying Opportunity Feb 22 2016 
Fresh Rally Likely for Nordic American Dec 07 2015 
Nordic American Tankers Remains Attractive Nov 04 2015 
This 10.9% Dividend Stock Is Enticing Sep 15 2015 
Nordic American Tankers: Consider Buying This High Dividend Yield Stock Apr 08 2015 
Teekay Tankers Is on a Recovery Path Jun 11 2014 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: BSAC, WIN, TCL, NAT, CONE Jun 04 2013 
84 Top-Yielding Stocks with Ex-Dividend Date November 2012 Oct 31 2012 
International Dividend Stocks – Maritime Transport, Risk Or Opportunity? Oct 17 2012 
Ex-Dividend Date Reminder For Next Week February 20 - 26, 2012 Feb 18 2012 

More From Other Websites
What Dividend Investors Need to Know about Crude Tanker Companies May 05 2016
Nordic American Tanker Announces $106 Million Acquisition Of 4 Tankers May 02 2016
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NYSE:NAT) - Acquiring Four Crude Oil Suezmax Tankers (150,000dwt) -... May 02 2016
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NYSE:NAT) - Acquiring Four Crude Oil Suezmax Tankers (150,000dwt) -... May 02 2016
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NYSE:NAT) - Acquiring Four Crude Oil Suezmax Tankers (150,000dwt) -... May 02 2016
Nordic American Tankers’ High Valuation: Peer Comparison Apr 26 2016
Which Crude Tanker Company Has the Most Newbuilds? Apr 26 2016
Crude Tanker Companies: Are Any Fleets Due for Scrapping? Apr 26 2016
Analyst Recommendations for Euronav before Earnings Release Apr 25 2016
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NYSE:NAT) - Declaration of Dividend for the 75th consecutive... Apr 25 2016
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NYSE:NAT) - Declaration of Dividend for the 75th consecutive... Apr 25 2016
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NYSE:NAT) - Declaration of Dividend for the 75th consecutive... Apr 25 2016
Week 14: Why the Crude Tanker Industry’s Valuation Multiple Fell Apr 22 2016
How Do Crude Tanker Companies Fleet Profiles Vary? Apr 21 2016
Time To Go Bargain Hunting In Shipping Stocks Apr 14 2016
Cramer Remix: A sucker’s game for this stock Apr 14 2016
Facebook, Nordic American Tankers, Relypsa, AstraZeneca and Amphastar Pharmaceuticals highlighted as... Apr 11 2016
Valuation Multiple’s Week 12 Fall: Crude Tanker Investors’ Pessimism Apr 09 2016
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NYSE:NAT) - Letter to Shareholders from the Chairman & CEO on the... Apr 05 2016
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NYSE:NAT) - Letter to Shareholders from the Chairman & CEO on the... Apr 05 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK