Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.17
NBL's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
71% of the 454 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.78 vs. NBL: 0.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NBL' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.15 Max: 0.5
Current: 0.17
0.01
0.5
Equity-to-Asset 0.44
NBL's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
58% of the 427 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. NBL: 0.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NBL' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 0.44 Max: 0.52
Current: 0.44
0.35
0.52
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 0.94
Beneish M-Score: -2.53
WACC vs ROIC
8.56%
-4.39%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -37.15
NBL's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
57% of the 436 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -48.73 vs. NBL: -37.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NBL' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -77.66  Med: 24.73 Max: 45.42
Current: -37.15
-77.66
45.42
Net Margin % -28.59
NBL's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
62% of the 436 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -55.69 vs. NBL: -28.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NBL' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -76.69  Med: 21.62 Max: 34.61
Current: -28.59
-76.69
34.61
ROE % -10.19
NBL's ROE % is ranked higher than
57% of the 428 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -15.73 vs. NBL: -10.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NBL' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.59  Med: 11.18 Max: 24.28
Current: -10.19
-23.59
24.28
ROA % -4.39
NBL's ROA % is ranked higher than
65% of the 506 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -11.12 vs. NBL: -4.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NBL' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.45  Med: 5.51 Max: 11.63
Current: -4.39
-10.45
11.63
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -7.26
NBL's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
65% of the 482 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -15.34 vs. NBL: -7.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NBL' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.92  Med: 10.76 Max: 25.13
Current: -7.26
-9.92
25.13
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -16.20
NBL's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
52% of the 376 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -17.10 vs. NBL: -16.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NBL' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.2  Med: 9 Max: 38.8
Current: -16.2
-16.2
38.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -34.80
NBL's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
71% of the 292 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -18.90 vs. NBL: -34.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NBL' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -62.2  Med: 14.7 Max: 65.5
Current: -34.8
-62.2
65.5
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with Noble Energy Inc $NBL.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NBL's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-04)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

NBL Guru Trades in Q1 2016

David Dreman 6,878 sh (New)
Jim Simons 275,277 sh (New)
Louis Moore Bacon 224,000 sh (New)
Ron Baron 101,549 sh (+16.66%)
Steven Cohen 3,210,000 sh (+12.26%)
Ray Dalio 137,562 sh (+4.56%)
RS Investment Management 1,646,195 sh (+3.75%)
Diamond Hill Capital 168,624 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 200,000 sh (unchged)
Paul Singer Sold Out
PRIMECAP Management 2,523,800 sh (-4.72%)
First Pacific Advisors 1,977,441 sh (-13.42%)
FPA Capital Fund 956,270 sh (-15.03%)
» More
Q2 2016

NBL Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 7,393 sh (New)
David Dreman 30,183 sh (+338.83%)
Jim Simons 418,277 sh (+51.95%)
RS Investment Management 1,653,953 sh (+0.47%)
Diamond Hill Capital 168,624 sh (unchged)
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
FPA Capital Fund 919,610 sh (-3.83%)
First Pacific Advisors 1,863,901 sh (-5.74%)
Ray Dalio 126,362 sh (-8.14%)
PRIMECAP Management 2,298,800 sh (-8.92%)
Ron Baron 84,049 sh (-17.23%)
Steven Cohen 1,794,637 sh (-44.09%)
» More
Q3 2016

NBL Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Joel Greenblatt 30,975 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 85,000 sh (New)
Diamond Hill Capital 169,168 sh (+0.32%)
FPA Capital Fund 919,610 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
PRIMECAP Management 2,293,000 sh (-0.25%)
Ray Dalio 122,562 sh (-3.01%)
David Dreman 28,789 sh (-4.62%)
First Pacific Advisors 1,771,151 sh (-4.98%)
Steven Cohen 1,577,270 sh (-12.11%)
Jim Simons 235,477 sh (-43.70%)
Ron Baron 31,449 sh (-62.58%)
» More
Q4 2016

NBL Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 298,077 sh (+26.58%)
PRIMECAP Management 2,262,700 sh (-1.32%)
First Pacific Advisors 1,715,931 sh (-3.12%)
David Dreman 27,316 sh (-5.12%)
Ron Baron 29,549 sh (-6.04%)
Joel Greenblatt 28,680 sh (-7.41%)
FPA Capital Fund 844,890 sh (-8.13%)
Diamond Hill Capital 154,222 sh (-8.84%)
Ray Dalio 105,762 sh (-13.71%)
Caxton Associates 43,693 sh (-48.60%)
Steven Cohen 651,300 sh (-58.71%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NBL

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P    NAICS: 211111    SIC: 1311
Compare:NYSE:BBG, AMEX:ESTE, OTCPK:BDCO, AMEX:BRN » details
Traded in other countries:NB6.Germany,
Noble Energy Inc is an independent energy company. The Company engaged in crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) exploration and production.

Noble Energy is an independent oil and gas producer with key assets in the U.S., Israel, and West Africa. At the end of 2016, the company reported net proved reserves of 1.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent. Net production averaged 420 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2016, at a ratio of 45% oil and natural gas liquids and 55% natural gas.

Guru Investment Theses on Noble Energy Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy - Feb 09, 2016

Let’s start with energy, as we know it is top of mind for many of our shareholders. A crucial factor we want to express is that the energy companies in the portfolio do not have any near-term refinancing risk, unlike many other energy companies that have large sums of debt coming due this year or next. A very recent example of how a strong balance sheet can benefit shareholders is Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL). NBL refinanced some of its intermediate debt maturities with shorter-term debt at substantially lower interest rates in early January 2016. Today, most energy companies seeking to refinance their debt would experience much higher interest payments, if they could even access the credit market. NBL was not only able to access the credit market but also lower its annual interest expense by $50 million for the same amount of debt outstanding.

When we assess the energy stock’s impact on the FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio), it is interesting to observe that the fund realized a net gain of over $200 million from 2008 through the end of 2015. The Fund realized gains every year from 2008-2014, with among the largest gains realized in 2014, when oil prices peaked. With hindsight, we blew it. We should have sold every one of our energy stocks by the end of 2014 and added the proceeds to our cash position.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s fourth quarter 2015 commentary.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy - Dec 09, 2015

The two other E&P investments we have are Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL) and SM Energy (SM). We chose to keep the NBL stock we received when NBL recently acquired Rosetta Resources. NBL has a diverse portfolio of low cost assets, balanced across commodities and regions. NBL management can grow production in 2016 with a greatly reduced capital budget should they choose to do so. They also have an opportunity to develop a massive gas resource off the coast of Israel where most of the production volumes would be at fixed prices under multi-year contracts, essentially creating a long duration and highly profitable stream of cash flow that would deserve a premium valuation multiple. Let us take a brief moment here to state that we voted against this deal as we had confidence that Rosetta Resource’s assets were of good quality and that the management team was selling them at very depressed levels. We pride ourselves on protecting our shareholders against permanent capital impairment but this was a takeunder17 so we were not successful. We congratulate the NBL management for a shrewd deal (one of the reasons we decided to keep the stock). Our third E&P company, SM, needs to do something to extend the depth of their future drilling inventory, whether organically or through an acquisition (opportunities do exist), but we believe they have the balance sheet and the CEO to do it. In the meantime, they have low cost assets and the stock is trading at a discounted multiple. Flexibility is a prized asset in this environment and they have it.





From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s third quarter 2015 letter to shareholders.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PB Ratio 1.52
NBL's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 501 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. NBL: 1.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
NBL' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.05  Med: 2.11 Max: 3.48
Current: 1.52
1.05
3.48
PS Ratio 4.04
NBL's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 491 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.49 vs. NBL: 4.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
NBL' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.44  Med: 4.26 Max: 6.04
Current: 4.04
1.44
6.04
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 10.44
NBL's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
65% of the 331 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 7.81 vs. NBL: 10.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
NBL' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.47  Med: 6.87 Max: 13.09
Current: 10.44
2.47
13.09
EV-to-EBIT -14.21
NBL's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 150 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 14.17 vs. NBL: -14.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
NBL' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -80.4  Med: 13.7 Max: 83.3
Current: -14.21
-80.4
83.3
EV-to-EBITDA 20.26
NBL's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
68% of the 268 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 13.25 vs. NBL: 20.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
NBL' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -424  Med: 7.9 Max: 1718.5
Current: 20.26
-424
1718.5
Shiller PE Ratio 29.88
NBL's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
68% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 16.48 vs. NBL: 29.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
NBL' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.68  Med: 27.05 Max: 48.09
Current: 29.88
13.68
48.09
Current Ratio 1.32
NBL's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 490 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. NBL: 1.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
NBL' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 1.1 Max: 1.84
Current: 1.32
0.66
1.84
Quick Ratio 1.26
NBL's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
53% of the 489 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. NBL: 1.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
NBL' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 1.06 Max: 1.75
Current: 1.26
0.64
1.75
Days Inventory 19.60
NBL's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
60% of the 200 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 28.39 vs. NBL: 19.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
NBL' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.54  Med: 29.59 Max: 52.92
Current: 19.6
18.54
52.92
Days Sales Outstanding 64.30
NBL's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
62% of the 388 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 56.15 vs. NBL: 64.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
NBL' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 39.58  Med: 65.28 Max: 83.96
Current: 64.3
39.58
83.96
Days Payable 133.78
NBL's Days Payable is ranked higher than
64% of the 239 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 88.02 vs. NBL: 133.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
NBL' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 133.78  Med: 378.77 Max: 587.06
Current: 133.78
133.78
587.06

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.22
NBL's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
84% of the 290 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.92 vs. NBL: 1.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
NBL' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 0.89 Max: 2.61
Current: 1.22
0.37
2.61
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -9.80
NBL's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
72% of the 97 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -32.80 vs. NBL: -9.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
NBL' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.8  Med: 14.8 Max: 63.9
Current: -9.8
-9.8
63.9
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.22
NBL's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
87% of the 256 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.75 vs. NBL: 1.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.53
NBL's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
76% of the 392 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.85 vs. NBL: 1.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
NBL' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 1.12 Max: 3.28
Current: 1.53
0.47
3.28
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -6.20
NBL's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
61% of the 370 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.80 vs. NBL: -6.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
NBL' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.3  Med: -0.7 Max: 0.5
Current: -6.2
-15.3
0.5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.52
NBL's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
60% of the 473 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. NBL: 1.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
NBL' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.36  Med: 2.38 Max: 3.38
Current: 1.52
1.36
3.38
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 149.18
NBL's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
99% of the 116 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.45 vs. NBL: 149.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
NBL' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.87  Med: 2.3 Max: 173
Current: 149.18
0.87
173
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.95
NBL's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
54% of the 430 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. NBL: 0.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
NBL' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.32  Med: 0.7 Max: 1.25
Current: 0.95
0.32
1.25
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -7.04
NBL's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
51% of the 575 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -6.93 vs. NBL: -7.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
NBL' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.2  Med: 6.8 Max: 27.8
Current: -7.04
1.2
27.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -9.78
NBL's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
61% of the 173 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -16.21 vs. NBL: -9.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
NBL' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11.1  Med: 11.3 Max: 46.9
Current: -9.78
-11.1
46.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $3,491
EPS (TTM) $ -2.32
Beta1.17
Short Percentage of Float6.11%
52-Week Range $28.82 - 42.03
Shares Outstanding (Mil)431.20

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 4,893 5,279 7,604
EPS ($) -0.16 0.12 2.00
EPS without NRI ($) -0.16 0.12 2.00
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
24.31%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.40 0.40 0.41
» More Articles for NBL

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
FPA Capital Fund sells Apollo Education, Helmerich & Payne Jul 25 2016 
5 Speculative and Overvalued Companies to Avoid - July Jul 17 2016 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Feb 09 2016 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Feb 09 2016 
FPA Capital Fund 4th Quarter Commentary Jan 28 2016 
Companies With High Dividend Yields in FPA Capital Fund's Portfolio Jan 12 2016 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Dec 09 2015 
FPA Capital Sells Stakes in Oil and Gas Companies Oct 13 2015 
FPA Capital Invests in Three New Stakes Oct 12 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: NBL, WFM, FLR, LPL Aug 04 2015 

More From Other Websites
How Cabot Oil and Gas’s Relative Valuation Compares to Peers Mar 17 2017
Why Is Noble Energy (NBL) Down 10.5% Since the Last Earnings Report? Mar 17 2017
Noble Energy to Present at Upcoming Energy Conference Mar 17 2017
Shareholder Alert: Monteverde & Associates PC Announces An Investigation Of Clayton Williams Energy,... Mar 14 2017
Analysts’ Recommendations for Upstream Companies Mar 14 2017
Noble Energy to close Clayton office, cut jobs after completing $2.7B acquisition Mar 13 2017
What Will Drive Noble Energy’s Capex and Production in 2017? Mar 13 2017
Marathon Oil is a bright spot in oil stocks after Permian Basin buy Mar 11 2017
What We Can Forecast for Chesapeake Energy Stock Next Week Mar 06 2017
NOBLE ENERGY INC Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a... Mar 01 2017
Cabot Oil & Gas’s Revenue and Profit Margin Trends Feb 27 2017
NOBLE ENERGY INC Files SEC form 8-K, Other Events Feb 24 2017
Noble Energy, partners move ahead with $3.75B project Feb 24 2017
Rice Energy’s Revenue Growth and Net Profit Margin Trends Feb 24 2017
Rice Energy’s 4Q16 Earnings Were Much Better Than Expected Feb 24 2017
Blog Coverage Noble Energy Sanctions First Phase of its Leviathan Natural Gas Project Feb 24 2017
Concho Resources’ Revenue Growth Shows Improvement Feb 23 2017
Chesapeake Energy Stock: Forecasting Next Week’s Price Range Feb 23 2017
WPX Energy (WPX) Q4 Loss Narrower than Expected, Sales Lag Feb 23 2017
Noble Energy Sanctions Leviathan Project Offshore Israel Feb 23 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)