Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.16
NBL's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
67% of the 455 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.47 vs. NBL: 0.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
NBL' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.14 Max: 0.55
Current: 0.16
0
0.55
Equity to Asset 0.43
NBL's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
58% of the 432 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. NBL: 0.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
NBL' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 0.44 Max: 0.53
Current: 0.43
0.24
0.53
F-Score: 3
Z-Score: 0.73
M-Score: -3.98
WACC vs ROIC
8.26%
-17.82%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -88.94
NBL's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
53% of the 444 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -75.59 vs. NBL: -88.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
NBL' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -88.94  Med: 32.26 Max: 51.69
Current: -88.94
-88.94
51.69
Net-margin (%) -90.52
NBL's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
50% of the 444 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -92.22 vs. NBL: -90.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
NBL' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -90.52  Med: 23.44 Max: 34.61
Current: -90.52
-90.52
34.61
ROE (%) -27.08
NBL's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
52% of the 444 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -22.27 vs. NBL: -27.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
NBL' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -27.08  Med: 11.83 Max: 24.28
Current: -27.08
-27.08
24.28
ROA (%) -12.26
NBL's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
55% of the 509 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -16.59 vs. NBL: -12.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
NBL' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.26  Med: 5.77 Max: 11.63
Current: -12.26
-12.26
11.63
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -12.35
NBL's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
64% of the 491 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -26.87 vs. NBL: -12.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
NBL' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.35  Med: 11.3 Max: 25.13
Current: -12.35
-12.35
25.13
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -12.80
NBL's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
55% of the 370 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -10.10 vs. NBL: -12.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NBL' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.4  Med: 9.6 Max: 48.9
Current: -12.8
-18.4
48.9
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -62.20
NBL's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
94% of the 263 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.70 vs. NBL: -62.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NBL' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -62.2  Med: 14.7 Max: 66.2
Current: -62.2
-62.2
66.2
» NBL's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-11-02)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2015

NBL Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Mario Gabelli 31,223 sh (New)
Third Avenue Management 122,223 sh (New)
FPA Capital Fund 1,060,863 sh (New)
Jim Simons 118,177 sh (New)
First Pacific Advisors 2,242,276 sh (New)
RS Investment Management 1,404,356 sh (+244.95%)
Diamond Hill Capital 780,845 sh (+195.46%)
Paul Singer 355,000 sh (+130.13%)
Ray Dalio 120,952 sh (+20.17%)
Steven Cohen 3,657,001 sh (+10.21%)
Ron Baron 52,649 sh (+6.69%)
PRIMECAP Management 2,648,800 sh (unchged)
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Stanley Druckenmiller Sold Out
George Soros 795,969 sh (-6.04%)
» More
Q4 2015

NBL Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Ron Baron 87,049 sh (+65.34%)
Paul Singer 504,000 sh (+41.97%)
RS Investment Management 1,586,741 sh (+12.99%)
Ray Dalio 131,562 sh (+8.77%)
FPA Capital Fund 1,125,463 sh (+6.09%)
First Pacific Advisors 2,283,966 sh (+1.86%)
PRIMECAP Management 2,648,800 sh (unchged)
Mario Gabelli Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Third Avenue Management Sold Out
George Soros Sold Out
Steven Cohen 2,859,461 sh (-21.81%)
Diamond Hill Capital 168,624 sh (-78.40%)
» More
Q1 2016

NBL Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Louis Moore Bacon 224,000 sh (New)
David Dreman 6,878 sh (New)
Jim Simons 275,277 sh (New)
Ron Baron 101,549 sh (+16.66%)
Steven Cohen 3,210,000 sh (+12.26%)
Ray Dalio 137,562 sh (+4.56%)
RS Investment Management 1,646,195 sh (+3.75%)
Diamond Hill Capital 168,624 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 200,000 sh (unchged)
Paul Singer Sold Out
PRIMECAP Management 2,523,800 sh (-4.72%)
First Pacific Advisors 1,977,441 sh (-13.42%)
FPA Capital Fund 956,270 sh (-15.03%)
» More
Q2 2016

NBL Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 7,393 sh (New)
David Dreman 30,183 sh (+338.83%)
Jim Simons 418,277 sh (+51.95%)
RS Investment Management 1,653,953 sh (+0.47%)
Diamond Hill Capital 168,624 sh (unchged)
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
FPA Capital Fund 919,610 sh (-3.83%)
First Pacific Advisors 1,863,901 sh (-5.74%)
Ray Dalio 126,362 sh (-8.14%)
PRIMECAP Management 2,298,800 sh (-8.92%)
Ron Baron 84,049 sh (-17.23%)
Steven Cohen 1,794,637 sh (-44.09%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NBL

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:NYSE:HES, NYSE:EQT, NYSE:MRO, OTCPK:IPXHY, NYSE:CXO, NYSE:COG, NYSE:XEC, OTCPK:OAOFY, NYSE:CLR, OTCPK:WOPEF, OTCPK:PTXLF, NYSE:NFX, NYSE:AR, NYSE:ECA, NYSE:DVN, OTCPK:OISHF, NAS:FANG, NYSE:SWN, OTCPK:SVRGF, NYSE:RRC » details
Traded in other countries:NB6.Germany,
Noble Energy Inc is an independent energy company. The Company engaged in crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) exploration and production.

Noble Energy Inc is a Delaware corporation, incorporated on December 29, 1969. The Company is an independent energy company engaged in crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) exploration and production. Its assets portfolio is diversified between short-term and long-term projects, domestic and international and a balanced production mix among crude oil, natural gas and NGLs. The Company operates in areas including USA (DJ Basin, Marcellus Shale, Eagle Ford Shale, and Permian Basin), deepwater Gulf of Mexico, offshore Eastern Mediterranean and offshore West Africa. The Company manages its business of crude oil, natural gas and NGL exploration, development, production and acquisition through the United States; West Africa (Equatorial Guinea, Cameroon, and Gabon; Eastern Mediterranean (Israel and Cyprus); and Other International and Corporate. Other International includes the Falkland Islands, Suriname, the North Sea, China), and new ventures. The Company's business is subject to various laws and regulations (and orders of regulatory bodies pursuant thereto) governing a wide variety of matters, including, among others, allowable rates of production, transportation, prevention of waste and pollution, and protection of the environment.

Guru Investment Theses on Noble Energy Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy - Feb 09, 2016

Let’s start with energy, as we know it is top of mind for many of our shareholders. A crucial factor we want to express is that the energy companies in the portfolio do not have any near-term refinancing risk, unlike many other energy companies that have large sums of debt coming due this year or next. A very recent example of how a strong balance sheet can benefit shareholders is Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL). NBL refinanced some of its intermediate debt maturities with shorter-term debt at substantially lower interest rates in early January 2016. Today, most energy companies seeking to refinance their debt would experience much higher interest payments, if they could even access the credit market. NBL was not only able to access the credit market but also lower its annual interest expense by $50 million for the same amount of debt outstanding.

When we assess the energy stock’s impact on the FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio), it is interesting to observe that the fund realized a net gain of over $200 million from 2008 through the end of 2015. The Fund realized gains every year from 2008-2014, with among the largest gains realized in 2014, when oil prices peaked. With hindsight, we blew it. We should have sold every one of our energy stocks by the end of 2014 and added the proceeds to our cash position.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s fourth quarter 2015 commentary.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy - Dec 09, 2015

The two other E&P investments we have are Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL) and SM Energy (SM). We chose to keep the NBL stock we received when NBL recently acquired Rosetta Resources. NBL has a diverse portfolio of low cost assets, balanced across commodities and regions. NBL management can grow production in 2016 with a greatly reduced capital budget should they choose to do so. They also have an opportunity to develop a massive gas resource off the coast of Israel where most of the production volumes would be at fixed prices under multi-year contracts, essentially creating a long duration and highly profitable stream of cash flow that would deserve a premium valuation multiple. Let us take a brief moment here to state that we voted against this deal as we had confidence that Rosetta Resource’s assets were of good quality and that the management team was selling them at very depressed levels. We pride ourselves on protecting our shareholders against permanent capital impairment but this was a takeunder17 so we were not successful. We congratulate the NBL management for a shrewd deal (one of the reasons we decided to keep the stock). Our third E&P company, SM, needs to do something to extend the depth of their future drilling inventory, whether organically or through an acquisition (opportunities do exist), but we believe they have the balance sheet and the CEO to do it. In the meantime, they have low cost assets and the stock is trading at a discounted multiple. Flexibility is a prized asset in this environment and they have it.





From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s third quarter 2015 letter to shareholders.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Noble Energy Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Guru stock highlight
Let’s start with energy, as we know it is top of mind for many of our shareholders. A crucial factor we want to express is that the energy companies in the portfolio do not have any near-term refinancing risk, unlike many other energy companies that have large sums of debt coming due this year or next. A very recent example of how a strong balance sheet can benefit shareholders is Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL). NBL refinanced some of its intermediate debt maturities with shorter-term debt at substantially lower interest rates in early January 2016. Today, most energy companies seeking to refinance their debt would experience much higher interest payments, if they could even access the credit market. NBL was not only able to access the credit market but also lower its annual interest expense by $50 million for the same amount of debt outstanding.

When we assess the energy stock’s impact on the FPA Capital Fund Read more...
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Guru stock highlight
The two other E&P investments we have are Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL) and SM Energy (SM). We chose to keep the NBL stock we received when NBL recently acquired Rosetta Resources. NBL has a diverse portfolio of low cost assets, balanced across commodities and regions. NBL management can grow production in 2016 with a greatly reduced capital budget should they choose to do so. They also have an opportunity to develop a massive gas resource off the coast of Israel where most of the production volumes would be at fixed prices under multi-year contracts, essentially creating a long duration and highly profitable stream of cash flow that would deserve a premium valuation multiple. Let us take a brief moment here to state that we voted against this deal as we had confidence that Rosetta Resource’s assets were of good quality and that the management team was selling them at very depressed levels. We pride ourselves on protecting our shareholders against permanent capital impairment but this was a takeunder17 so we were not successful. We congratulate the NBL management for a shrewd deal (one of the reasons we decided to keep the stock). Our third E&P company, SM, needs to do something to Read more...
FPA Capital Invests in Three New Stakes Fund adds Noble Energy, Patterson-UTI Energy, Barnes & Noble to portfolio
FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) invested in three companies that are new to its portfolio during the quarter ended Sept. 30 – Noble Energy Inc. (NYSE:NBL), Patterson-UTI Energy Inc. (NASDAQ:PTEN) and Barnes & Noble Inc. (NYSE:BKS). Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/B 1.46
NBL's P/B is ranked lower than
60% of the 422 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.06 vs. NBL: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
NBL' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.05  Med: 2.16 Max: 3.48
Current: 1.46
1.05
3.48
P/S 4.31
NBL's P/S is ranked lower than
62% of the 411 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. NBL: 4.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
NBL' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.44  Med: 4.19 Max: 6.04
Current: 4.31
1.44
6.04
POCF 8.93
NBL's POCF is ranked lower than
60% of the 275 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.75 vs. NBL: 8.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
NBL' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.47  Med: 6.7 Max: 9.98
Current: 8.93
2.47
9.98
Shiller P/E 24.62
NBL's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
63% of the 86 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. NBL: 24.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
NBL' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.79  Med: 27.01 Max: 48.09
Current: 24.62
13.79
48.09
Current Ratio 1.59
NBL's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 494 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. NBL: 1.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
NBL' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 1.03 Max: 1.95
Current: 1.59
0.6
1.95
Quick Ratio 1.51
NBL's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 494 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. NBL: 1.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
NBL' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.57  Med: 1.01 Max: 1.95
Current: 1.51
0.57
1.95
Days Inventory 30.21
NBL's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
52% of the 203 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 28.51 vs. NBL: 30.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
NBL' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23.68  Med: 29.57 Max: 52.92
Current: 30.21
23.68
52.92
Days Sales Outstanding 37.77
NBL's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
61% of the 382 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 44.85 vs. NBL: 37.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
NBL' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 37.77  Med: 66.71 Max: 83.96
Current: 37.77
37.77
83.96
Days Payable 198.67
NBL's Days Payable is ranked higher than
83% of the 231 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 73.48 vs. NBL: 198.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
NBL' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 198.67  Med: 378.77 Max: 587.06
Current: 198.67
198.67
587.06

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 1.45
NBL's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
81% of the 295 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.33 vs. NBL: 1.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
NBL' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 0.86 Max: 2.61
Current: 1.45
0.27
2.61
Dividend Growth (3y) 16.50
NBL's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
83% of the 90 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -17.50 vs. NBL: 16.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
NBL' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 14.8 Max: 63.9
Current: 16.5
0
63.9
Forward Dividend Yield 1.21
NBL's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
83% of the 234 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.32 vs. NBL: 1.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 3.12
NBL's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
56% of the 378 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.86 vs. NBL: 3.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
NBL' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.57  Med: 1.81 Max: 5.51
Current: 3.12
0.57
5.51
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -6.20
NBL's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 365 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.20 vs. NBL: -6.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
NBL' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.3  Med: -0.7 Max: 0.5
Current: -6.2
-15.3
0.5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 1.46
NBL's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
57% of the 396 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.19 vs. NBL: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
NBL' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.12  Med: 2.47 Max: 5.15
Current: 1.46
1.12
5.15
Price/Projected FCF 97.12
NBL's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
99% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. NBL: 97.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
NBL' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.87  Med: 2.32 Max: 105.5
Current: 97.12
0.87
105.5
Price/Median PS Value 1.03
NBL's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
61% of the 363 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.89 vs. NBL: 1.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
NBL' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 0.77 Max: 11.96
Current: 1.03
0.24
11.96
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -12.20
NBL's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
53% of the 501 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.70 vs. NBL: -12.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
NBL' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.2  Med: 6.95 Max: 27.8
Current: -12.2
-12.2
27.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -9.73
NBL's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
57% of the 172 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -15.43 vs. NBL: -9.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
NBL' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11.1  Med: 13.1 Max: 47.8
Current: -9.73
-11.1
47.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $3,218
EPS (TTM) $ -7.09
Beta1.21
Short Percentage of Float2.87%
52-Week Range $23.77 - 39.85
Shares Outstanding (Mil)429.67

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 3,784 4,416 5,429
EPS ($) -0.89 -0.69 -0.01
EPS w/o NRI ($) -0.89 -0.69 -0.01
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
-5.31%
Dividends Per Share ($) 0.40 0.40 0.40
» More Articles for NBL

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
FPA Capital Fund sells Apollo Education, Helmerich & Payne Jul 25 2016 
5 Speculative and Overvalued Companies to Avoid - July Jul 17 2016 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Feb 09 2016 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Feb 09 2016 
FPA Capital Fund 4th Quarter Commentary Jan 28 2016 
Companies With High Dividend Yields in FPA Capital Fund's Portfolio Jan 12 2016 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Dec 09 2015 
FPA Capital Sells Stakes in Oil and Gas Companies Oct 13 2015 
FPA Capital Invests in Three New Stakes Oct 12 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: NBL, WFM, FLR, LPL Aug 04 2015 

More From Other Websites
U.S. Oil Rig Count Climbs By 2 But Permian, Eagle Ford See Dips Sep 23 2016
Noble Energy Will Host Its Third Quarter 2016 Results Webcast on November 2nd Sep 23 2016
Noble Energy Will Host Its Third Quarter 2016 Results Webcast on November 2nd Sep 23 2016
Anadarko Petroleum Announces $2 Billion GOM Acquisition Sep 22 2016
Noble Midstream Partners LP Announces Closing of Initial Public Offering and Full Exercise of... Sep 20 2016
Who Will Win The Permian's Latest Bidding War? Sep 16 2016
Noble Midstream Partners Prices IPO at $22.50/unit Sep 15 2016
Noble, Marathon Said to Weigh Bids for Permian’s Silver Hill Sep 15 2016
Second time's the charm for Noble Midstream IPO Sep 15 2016
Noble Energy, Inc. – Value Analysis (NYSE:NBL) : September 15, 2016 Sep 15 2016
Noble Midstream Jumps in Debut as Colorado Drops Frack Ban Sep 15 2016
Noble's MLP prices IPO higher than expected, to begin trading Sep 15 2016
Noble Midstream Raises $281 Million in Year’s First MLP IPO Sep 14 2016
Noble Midstream Jumps in Trading Debut of Year’s First Oil IPO Sep 14 2016
Noble Midstream Partners LP Announces Pricing of Initial Public Offering Sep 14 2016
Noble Energy, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : NBL-US : September 14,... Sep 14 2016
Why Apple, Chipotle, and 3 Energy Stocks Are Turning Heads Today Sep 13 2016
Strong Sponsor Support to Drive Noble Midstream Partners’ Growth Sep 12 2016
Noble Midstream expects to raise up to $263 mln in IPO Sep 07 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)