Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.12
NBL's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
71% of the 452 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.43 vs. NBL: 0.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
NBL' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.13 Max: 0.55
Current: 0.12
0
0.55
Equity to Asset 0.43
NBL's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
57% of the 440 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. NBL: 0.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
NBL' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 0.44 Max: 0.53
Current: 0.43
0.24
0.53
F-Score: 2
Z-Score: 0.80
M-Score: -4.19
WACC vs ROIC
8.03%
-17.31%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -89.04
NBL's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
57% of the 445 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -63.48 vs. NBL: -89.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
NBL' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -78.9  Med: 32.26 Max: 51.69
Current: -89.04
-78.9
51.69
Net-margin (%) -87.29
NBL's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
53% of the 445 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -68.47 vs. NBL: -87.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
NBL' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -77.91  Med: 23.44 Max: 34.61
Current: -87.29
-77.91
34.61
ROE (%) -24.41
NBL's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
52% of the 460 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -22.18 vs. NBL: -24.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
NBL' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.59  Med: 11.83 Max: 24.28
Current: -24.41
-23.59
24.28
ROA (%) -11.32
NBL's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
53% of the 505 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -12.66 vs. NBL: -11.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
NBL' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.45  Med: 5.77 Max: 11.63
Current: -11.32
-10.45
11.63
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -11.61
NBL's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
60% of the 487 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -21.94 vs. NBL: -11.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
NBL' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.92  Med: 11.30 Max: 25.13
Current: -11.61
-9.92
25.13
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -12.70
NBL's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
57% of the 376 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.50 vs. NBL: -12.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NBL' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.7  Med: 8.60 Max: 23.2
Current: -12.7
-12.7
23.2
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -62.10
NBL's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
93% of the 254 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.10 vs. NBL: -62.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NBL' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -62.1  Med: 14.70 Max: 66.8
Current: -62.1
-62.1
66.8
» NBL's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-08-03)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

NBL Guru Trades in Q2 2015

RS Investment Management 407,120 sh (New)
Paul Singer 154,261 sh (New)
Louis Moore Bacon 70,000 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 8,700 sh (New)
Ron Baron 49,349 sh (+60.49%)
Diamond Hill Capital 264,277 sh (+8.90%)
Steven Cohen 3,318,305 sh (+2.34%)
Ray Dalio 100,652 sh (-2.80%)
PRIMECAP Management 2,648,800 sh (-19.91%)
Stanley Druckenmiller 315,200 sh (-49.27%)
George Soros 847,092 sh (-64.89%)
» More
Q3 2015

NBL Guru Trades in Q3 2015

FPA Capital Fund 1,060,863 sh (New)
Third Avenue Management 122,223 sh (New)
Mario Gabelli 31,223 sh (New)
Jim Simons 118,177 sh (New)
First Pacific Advisors 2,242,276 sh (New)
RS Investment Management 1,404,356 sh (+244.95%)
Diamond Hill Capital 780,845 sh (+195.46%)
Paul Singer 355,000 sh (+130.13%)
Ray Dalio 120,952 sh (+20.17%)
Steven Cohen 3,657,001 sh (+10.21%)
Ron Baron 52,649 sh (+6.69%)
PRIMECAP Management 2,648,800 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Stanley Druckenmiller Sold Out
George Soros 795,969 sh (-6.04%)
» More
Q4 2015

NBL Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Ron Baron 87,049 sh (+65.34%)
Paul Singer 504,000 sh (+41.97%)
RS Investment Management 1,586,741 sh (+12.99%)
Ray Dalio 131,562 sh (+8.77%)
FPA Capital Fund 1,125,463 sh (+6.09%)
First Pacific Advisors 2,283,966 sh (+1.86%)
PRIMECAP Management 2,648,800 sh (unchged)
Third Avenue Management Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
George Soros Sold Out
Mario Gabelli Sold Out
Steven Cohen 2,859,461 sh (-21.81%)
Diamond Hill Capital 168,624 sh (-78.40%)
» More
Q1 2016

NBL Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Louis Moore Bacon 224,000 sh (New)
David Dreman 6,878 sh (New)
Jim Simons 275,277 sh (New)
Ron Baron 101,549 sh (+16.66%)
Steven Cohen 3,210,000 sh (+12.26%)
Ray Dalio 137,562 sh (+4.56%)
RS Investment Management 1,646,195 sh (+3.75%)
Diamond Hill Capital 168,624 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 200,000 sh (unchged)
Paul Singer Sold Out
PRIMECAP Management 2,523,800 sh (-4.72%)
First Pacific Advisors 1,977,441 sh (-13.42%)
FPA Capital Fund 956,270 sh (-15.03%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NBL

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:NYSE:CXO, NYSE:CLR, OTCPK:WOPEF, NYSE:HES, NYSE:EQT, NYSE:DVN, OTCPK:IPXHY, NYSE:COG, OTCPK:OAOFY, NYSE:APA, NYSE:MRO, NYSE:XEC, OTCPK:MITSF, OTCPK:PTXLF, NYSE:NFX, NYSE:CPG, NYSE:AR, NYSE:RRC, OTCPK:OISHF, NYSE:ECA » details
Traded in other countries:NB6.Germany,
Noble Energy Inc is an independent energy company. The Company engaged in crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) exploration and production.

Noble Energy Inc is a Delaware corporation, incorporated on December 29, 1969. The Company is an independent energy company engaged in crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) exploration and production. Its assets portfolio is diversified between short-term and long-term projects, domestic and international and a balanced production mix among crude oil, natural gas and NGLs. The Company operates in areas including USA (DJ Basin, Marcellus Shale, Eagle Ford Shale, and Permian Basin), deepwater Gulf of Mexico, offshore Eastern Mediterranean and offshore West Africa. The Company manages its business of crude oil, natural gas and NGL exploration, development, production and acquisition through the United States; West Africa (Equatorial Guinea, Cameroon, and Gabon; Eastern Mediterranean (Israel and Cyprus); and Other International and Corporate. Other International includes the Falkland Islands, Suriname, the North Sea, China), and new ventures. The Company's business is subject to various laws and regulations (and orders of regulatory bodies pursuant thereto) governing a wide variety of matters, including, among others, allowable rates of production, transportation, prevention of waste and pollution, and protection of the environment.

Guru Investment Theses on Noble Energy Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy - Feb 09, 2016

Let’s start with energy, as we know it is top of mind for many of our shareholders. A crucial factor we want to express is that the energy companies in the portfolio do not have any near-term refinancing risk, unlike many other energy companies that have large sums of debt coming due this year or next. A very recent example of how a strong balance sheet can benefit shareholders is Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL). NBL refinanced some of its intermediate debt maturities with shorter-term debt at substantially lower interest rates in early January 2016. Today, most energy companies seeking to refinance their debt would experience much higher interest payments, if they could even access the credit market. NBL was not only able to access the credit market but also lower its annual interest expense by $50 million for the same amount of debt outstanding.

When we assess the energy stock’s impact on the FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio), it is interesting to observe that the fund realized a net gain of over $200 million from 2008 through the end of 2015. The Fund realized gains every year from 2008-2014, with among the largest gains realized in 2014, when oil prices peaked. With hindsight, we blew it. We should have sold every one of our energy stocks by the end of 2014 and added the proceeds to our cash position.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s fourth quarter 2015 commentary.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy - Dec 09, 2015

The two other E&P investments we have are Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL) and SM Energy (SM). We chose to keep the NBL stock we received when NBL recently acquired Rosetta Resources. NBL has a diverse portfolio of low cost assets, balanced across commodities and regions. NBL management can grow production in 2016 with a greatly reduced capital budget should they choose to do so. They also have an opportunity to develop a massive gas resource off the coast of Israel where most of the production volumes would be at fixed prices under multi-year contracts, essentially creating a long duration and highly profitable stream of cash flow that would deserve a premium valuation multiple. Let us take a brief moment here to state that we voted against this deal as we had confidence that Rosetta Resource’s assets were of good quality and that the management team was selling them at very depressed levels. We pride ourselves on protecting our shareholders against permanent capital impairment but this was a takeunder17 so we were not successful. We congratulate the NBL management for a shrewd deal (one of the reasons we decided to keep the stock). Our third E&P company, SM, needs to do something to extend the depth of their future drilling inventory, whether organically or through an acquisition (opportunities do exist), but we believe they have the balance sheet and the CEO to do it. In the meantime, they have low cost assets and the stock is trading at a discounted multiple. Flexibility is a prized asset in this environment and they have it.





From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s third quarter 2015 letter to shareholders.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Noble Energy Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Guru stock highlight
Let’s start with energy, as we know it is top of mind for many of our shareholders. A crucial factor we want to express is that the energy companies in the portfolio do not have any near-term refinancing risk, unlike many other energy companies that have large sums of debt coming due this year or next. A very recent example of how a strong balance sheet can benefit shareholders is Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL). NBL refinanced some of its intermediate debt maturities with shorter-term debt at substantially lower interest rates in early January 2016. Today, most energy companies seeking to refinance their debt would experience much higher interest payments, if they could even access the credit market. NBL was not only able to access the credit market but also lower its annual interest expense by $50 million for the same amount of debt outstanding.

When we assess the energy stock’s impact on the FPA Capital Fund Read more...
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Guru stock highlight
The two other E&P investments we have are Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL) and SM Energy (SM). We chose to keep the NBL stock we received when NBL recently acquired Rosetta Resources. NBL has a diverse portfolio of low cost assets, balanced across commodities and regions. NBL management can grow production in 2016 with a greatly reduced capital budget should they choose to do so. They also have an opportunity to develop a massive gas resource off the coast of Israel where most of the production volumes would be at fixed prices under multi-year contracts, essentially creating a long duration and highly profitable stream of cash flow that would deserve a premium valuation multiple. Let us take a brief moment here to state that we voted against this deal as we had confidence that Rosetta Resource’s assets were of good quality and that the management team was selling them at very depressed levels. We pride ourselves on protecting our shareholders against permanent capital impairment but this was a takeunder17 so we were not successful. We congratulate the NBL management for a shrewd deal (one of the reasons we decided to keep the stock). Our third E&P company, SM, needs to do something to Read more...
FPA Capital Invests in Three New Stakes Fund adds Noble Energy, Patterson-UTI Energy, Barnes & Noble to portfolio
FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) invested in three companies that are new to its portfolio during the quarter ended Sept. 30 – Noble Energy Inc. (NYSE:NBL), Patterson-UTI Energy Inc. (NASDAQ:PTEN) and Barnes & Noble Inc. (NYSE:BKS). Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/B 1.46
NBL's P/B is ranked lower than
69% of the 441 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.98 vs. NBL: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
NBL' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.05  Med: 2.19 Max: 3.48
Current: 1.46
1.05
3.48
P/S 4.56
NBL's P/S is ranked lower than
70% of the 431 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.20 vs. NBL: 4.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
NBL' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.44  Med: 4.13 Max: 6.04
Current: 4.56
1.44
6.04
POCF 8.03
NBL's POCF is ranked lower than
65% of the 302 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.63 vs. NBL: 8.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
NBL' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.47  Med: 6.64 Max: 9.5
Current: 8.03
2.47
9.5
Shiller P/E 24.25
NBL's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
68% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 13.43 vs. NBL: 24.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
NBL' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.99  Med: 26.93 Max: 58.15
Current: 24.25
13.99
58.15
Current Ratio 1.30
NBL's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
52% of the 488 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.36 vs. NBL: 1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
NBL' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 1.03 Max: 1.95
Current: 1.3
0.6
1.95
Quick Ratio 1.23
NBL's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 488 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. NBL: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
NBL' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.57  Med: 1.01 Max: 1.95
Current: 1.23
0.57
1.95
Days Inventory 31.50
NBL's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
55% of the 209 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 26.10 vs. NBL: 31.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
NBL' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23.68  Med: 31.68 Max: 52.92
Current: 31.5
23.68
52.92
Days Sales Outstanding 39.43
NBL's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
51% of the 394 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 38.60 vs. NBL: 39.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
NBL' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 39.58  Med: 66.71 Max: 75.95
Current: 39.43
39.58
75.95
Days Payable 267.37
NBL's Days Payable is ranked higher than
85% of the 260 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 74.36 vs. NBL: 267.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
NBL' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 238.26  Med: 393.13 Max: 546.48
Current: 267.37
238.26
546.48

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 1.62
NBL's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
83% of the 310 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. NBL: 1.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
NBL' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.84 Max: 2.61
Current: 1.62
0.23
2.61
Dividend Growth (3y) 16.50
NBL's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
83% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -18.30 vs. NBL: 16.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
NBL' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 14.80 Max: 63.9
Current: 16.5
0
63.9
Forward Dividend Yield 1.08
NBL's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
84% of the 238 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.39 vs. NBL: 1.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 3.27
NBL's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
63% of the 384 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.39 vs. NBL: 3.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
NBL' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 1.77 Max: 5.51
Current: 3.27
0.49
5.51
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -6.20
NBL's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 365 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.50 vs. NBL: -6.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
NBL' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.3  Med: -0.70 Max: 0.5
Current: -6.2
-15.3
0.5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 1.58
NBL's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
66% of the 417 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. NBL: 1.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
NBL' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.12  Med: 2.48 Max: 5.15
Current: 1.58
1.12
5.15
Price/Projected FCF 40.60
NBL's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
98% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. NBL: 40.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
NBL' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.87  Med: 2.30 Max: 34.52
Current: 40.6
0.87
34.52
Price/Median PS Value 1.18
NBL's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
73% of the 390 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.75 vs. NBL: 1.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
NBL' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 0.76 Max: 10.48
Current: 1.18
0.24
10.48
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -10.74
NBL's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
54% of the 523 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -12.20 vs. NBL: -10.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
NBL' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.35  Med: 7.05 Max: 27.8
Current: -10.74
-10.35
27.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -8.99
NBL's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
58% of the 174 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -15.81 vs. NBL: -8.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
NBL' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11.1  Med: 13.00 Max: 46.2
Current: -8.99
-11.1
46.2

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $3,101
EPS (TTM) $ -6.31
Beta1.14
Short Percentage of Float2.86%
52-Week Range $23.77 - 45.30
Shares Outstanding (Mil)429.59

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 3,280 4,218 5,445
EPS ($) -1.10 -0.80 -0.10
EPS w/o NRI ($) -1.10 -0.80 -0.10
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
-12.30%
» More Articles for NBL

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Feb 09 2016 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Feb 09 2016 
FPA Capital Fund 4th Quarter Commentary Jan 28 2016 
Companies With High Dividend Yields in FPA Capital Fund's Portfolio Jan 12 2016 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Dec 09 2015 
FPA Capital Sells Stakes in Oil and Gas Companies Oct 13 2015 
FPA Capital Invests in Three New Stakes Oct 12 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: NBL, WFM, FLR, LPL Aug 04 2015 
FPA Capital Fund Sells Portions of 13 Stakes in Second Quarter Jul 13 2015 
Stanley Druckenmiller's Top 5 New Stocks May 25 2015 

More From Other Websites
Research Report Initiated on Select Independent Oil and Gas Equities Jun 24 2016
Noble Energy (NBL) Stock Coverage Initiated at CSLA Jun 22 2016
Oil Stocks: At the Cusp of Multi-Year Outperformance? Jun 22 2016
Coverage initiated on Noble Energy by Credit Agricole Jun 22 2016
A Look at EQT’s Valuation Compared to Its Peers Jun 21 2016
CONE Midstream To Participate In Credit Suisse MLP & Energy Logistics Conference Jun 20 2016
Stock Market Outlook Remains Cautious Jun 17 2016
Israel To Offer Up Tantalizing Offshore Gas Exploration Blocks Jun 17 2016
Noble Energy to Up Wells Ranch Acreage Via Asset Exchange Jun 17 2016
2 big energy companies swap thousands of acres in Weld County Jun 16 2016
Noble Energy Further Enhances Wells Ranch Position Through DJ Basin Acreage Trade Jun 16 2016
PDC Energy Signs Definitive Agreements with Noble Energy for Strategic Acreage Trade in the Core... Jun 16 2016
Noble Energy Further Enhances Wells Ranch Position Through DJ Basin Acreage Trade Jun 16 2016
PDC Energy Signs Definitive Agreements with Noble Energy for Strategic Acreage Trade in the Core... Jun 16 2016
Noble Energy to Present at Upcoming Energy Conferences Jun 13 2016
Noble Energy to Present at Upcoming Energy Conferences Jun 13 2016
Lebanon Losing The Levant Basin Battle By Default Jun 09 2016
[$$] Debt traders miss credit default swaps as losses loom Jun 09 2016
Trader's Daily Notebook: Gusher for Oil Stocks Jun 08 2016
10 Oil Stocks to Consider as Part of an Industry Recovery Jun 07 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)