Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.13
NBL's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
67% of the 446 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.41 vs. NBL: 0.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
NBL' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.12 Max: 0.5
Current: 0.13
0.01
0.5
Equity to Asset 0.43
NBL's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
57% of the 439 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. NBL: 0.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
NBL' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 0.44 Max: 0.52
Current: 0.43
0.35
0.52
F-Score: 3
Z-Score: 0.82
M-Score: -4.11
WACC vs ROIC
8.39%
-16.50%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -78.86
NBL's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
57% of the 443 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -48.82 vs. NBL: -78.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
NBL' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -78.9  Med: 32.26 Max: 51.69
Current: -78.86
-78.9
51.69
Net-margin (%) -77.87
NBL's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
53% of the 443 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -68.69 vs. NBL: -77.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
NBL' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -77.91  Med: 23.44 Max: 34.61
Current: -77.87
-77.91
34.61
ROE (%) -21.92
NBL's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
52% of the 461 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -23.99 vs. NBL: -21.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
NBL' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.59  Med: 11.83 Max: 24.28
Current: -21.92
-23.59
24.28
ROA (%) -10.29
NBL's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
56% of the 500 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -14.42 vs. NBL: -10.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
NBL' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.45  Med: 5.77 Max: 11.63
Current: -10.29
-10.45
11.63
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -9.94
NBL's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
63% of the 484 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -22.77 vs. NBL: -9.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
NBL' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.92  Med: 11.30 Max: 25.13
Current: -9.94
-9.92
25.13
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -12.80
NBL's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
63% of the 365 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -5.10 vs. NBL: -12.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NBL' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.8  Med: 9.10 Max: 22.8
Current: -12.8
-12.8
22.8
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -62.20
NBL's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
96% of the 250 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -6.50 vs. NBL: -62.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NBL' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -62.2  Med: 14.70 Max: 67.5
Current: -62.2
-62.2
67.5
» NBL's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2016-05-04)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

NBL Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Paul Tudor Jones 8,700 sh (New)
Louis Moore Bacon 70,000 sh (New)
Paul Singer 154,261 sh (New)
RS Investment Management 407,120 sh (New)
Ron Baron 49,349 sh (+60.49%)
Diamond Hill Capital 264,277 sh (+8.90%)
Steven Cohen 3,318,305 sh (+2.34%)
Ray Dalio 100,652 sh (-2.80%)
PRIMECAP Management 2,648,800 sh (-19.91%)
Stanley Druckenmiller 315,200 sh (-49.27%)
George Soros 847,092 sh (-64.89%)
» More
Q3 2015

NBL Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Third Avenue Management 122,223 sh (New)
Jim Simons 118,177 sh (New)
Mario Gabelli 31,223 sh (New)
FPA Capital Fund 1,060,863 sh (New)
First Pacific Advisors 2,242,276 sh (New)
RS Investment Management 1,404,356 sh (+244.95%)
Diamond Hill Capital 780,845 sh (+195.46%)
Paul Singer 355,000 sh (+130.13%)
Ray Dalio 120,952 sh (+20.17%)
Steven Cohen 3,657,001 sh (+10.21%)
Ron Baron 52,649 sh (+6.69%)
PRIMECAP Management 2,648,800 sh (unchged)
Stanley Druckenmiller Sold Out
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
George Soros 795,969 sh (-6.04%)
» More
Q4 2015

NBL Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Ron Baron 87,049 sh (+65.34%)
Paul Singer 504,000 sh (+41.97%)
RS Investment Management 1,586,741 sh (+12.99%)
Ray Dalio 131,562 sh (+8.77%)
FPA Capital Fund 1,125,463 sh (+6.09%)
First Pacific Advisors 2,283,966 sh (+1.86%)
PRIMECAP Management 2,648,800 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Mario Gabelli Sold Out
Third Avenue Management Sold Out
George Soros Sold Out
Steven Cohen 2,859,461 sh (-21.81%)
Diamond Hill Capital 168,624 sh (-78.40%)
» More
Q1 2016

NBL Guru Trades in Q1 2016

FPA Capital Fund 956,270 sh (-15.03%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NBL

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Noble Energy Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy - Feb 09, 2016

Let’s start with energy, as we know it is top of mind for many of our shareholders. A crucial factor we want to express is that the energy companies in the portfolio do not have any near-term refinancing risk, unlike many other energy companies that have large sums of debt coming due this year or next. A very recent example of how a strong balance sheet can benefit shareholders is Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL). NBL refinanced some of its intermediate debt maturities with shorter-term debt at substantially lower interest rates in early January 2016. Today, most energy companies seeking to refinance their debt would experience much higher interest payments, if they could even access the credit market. NBL was not only able to access the credit market but also lower its annual interest expense by $50 million for the same amount of debt outstanding.

When we assess the energy stock’s impact on the FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio), it is interesting to observe that the fund realized a net gain of over $200 million from 2008 through the end of 2015. The Fund realized gains every year from 2008-2014, with among the largest gains realized in 2014, when oil prices peaked. With hindsight, we blew it. We should have sold every one of our energy stocks by the end of 2014 and added the proceeds to our cash position.

From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s fourth quarter 2015 commentary.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy - Dec 09, 2015

The two other E&P investments we have are Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL) and SM Energy (SM). We chose to keep the NBL stock we received when NBL recently acquired Rosetta Resources. NBL has a diverse portfolio of low cost assets, balanced across commodities and regions. NBL management can grow production in 2016 with a greatly reduced capital budget should they choose to do so. They also have an opportunity to develop a massive gas resource off the coast of Israel where most of the production volumes would be at fixed prices under multi-year contracts, essentially creating a long duration and highly profitable stream of cash flow that would deserve a premium valuation multiple. Let us take a brief moment here to state that we voted against this deal as we had confidence that Rosetta Resource’s assets were of good quality and that the management team was selling them at very depressed levels. We pride ourselves on protecting our shareholders against permanent capital impairment but this was a takeunder17 so we were not successful. We congratulate the NBL management for a shrewd deal (one of the reasons we decided to keep the stock). Our third E&P company, SM, needs to do something to extend the depth of their future drilling inventory, whether organically or through an acquisition (opportunities do exist), but we believe they have the balance sheet and the CEO to do it. In the meantime, they have low cost assets and the stock is trading at a discounted multiple. Flexibility is a prized asset in this environment and they have it.





From FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio)'s third quarter 2015 letter to shareholders.

Check out FPA Capital Fund latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Noble Energy Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Guru stock highlight
Let’s start with energy, as we know it is top of mind for many of our shareholders. A crucial factor we want to express is that the energy companies in the portfolio do not have any near-term refinancing risk, unlike many other energy companies that have large sums of debt coming due this year or next. A very recent example of how a strong balance sheet can benefit shareholders is Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL). NBL refinanced some of its intermediate debt maturities with shorter-term debt at substantially lower interest rates in early January 2016. Today, most energy companies seeking to refinance their debt would experience much higher interest payments, if they could even access the credit market. NBL was not only able to access the credit market but also lower its annual interest expense by $50 million for the same amount of debt outstanding.

When we assess the energy stock’s impact on the FPA Capital Fund Read more...
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Guru stock highlight
The two other E&P investments we have are Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL) and SM Energy (SM). We chose to keep the NBL stock we received when NBL recently acquired Rosetta Resources. NBL has a diverse portfolio of low cost assets, balanced across commodities and regions. NBL management can grow production in 2016 with a greatly reduced capital budget should they choose to do so. They also have an opportunity to develop a massive gas resource off the coast of Israel where most of the production volumes would be at fixed prices under multi-year contracts, essentially creating a long duration and highly profitable stream of cash flow that would deserve a premium valuation multiple. Let us take a brief moment here to state that we voted against this deal as we had confidence that Rosetta Resource’s assets were of good quality and that the management team was selling them at very depressed levels. We pride ourselves on protecting our shareholders against permanent capital impairment but this was a takeunder17 so we were not successful. We congratulate the NBL management for a shrewd deal (one of the reasons we decided to keep the stock). Our third E&P company, SM, needs to do something to Read more...
FPA Capital Invests in Three New Stakes Fund adds Noble Energy, Patterson-UTI Energy, Barnes & Noble to portfolio
FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) invested in three companies that are new to its portfolio during the quarter ended Sept. 30 – Noble Energy Inc. (NYSE:NBL), Patterson-UTI Energy Inc. (NASDAQ:PTEN) and Barnes & Noble Inc. (NYSE:BKS). Read more...
Soros Buys Homebuilders, Oil Companies as Top New Positions
George Soros (Trades, Portfolio) in the first quarter had 23% turnover in his stock portfolio with 81 new stocks added. But the top five all came from the same two sectors: oil and gas, and homebuilding and construction. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/B 1.47
NBL's P/B is ranked lower than
70% of the 427 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. NBL: 1.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
NBL' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.05  Med: 2.20 Max: 3.48
Current: 1.47
1.05
3.48
P/S 4.48
NBL's P/S is ranked lower than
74% of the 414 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.69 vs. NBL: 4.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
NBL' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.44  Med: 4.12 Max: 6.04
Current: 4.48
1.44
6.04
POCF 6.78
NBL's POCF is ranked lower than
66% of the 301 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.17 vs. NBL: 6.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
NBL' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.47  Med: 6.57 Max: 9.49
Current: 6.78
2.47
9.49
EV-to-EBIT -11.34
NBL's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 147 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 9.17 vs. NBL: -11.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
NBL' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -80.4  Med: 13.70 Max: 83
Current: -11.34
-80.4
83
EV-to-EBITDA 128.42
NBL's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
96% of the 218 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 8.41 vs. NBL: 128.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
NBL' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.6  Med: 7.80 Max: 123.9
Current: 128.42
2.6
123.9
Shiller P/E 22.62
NBL's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
72% of the 95 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 11.54 vs. NBL: 22.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
NBL' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.99  Med: 27.06 Max: 58.15
Current: 22.62
13.99
58.15
Current Ratio 1.26
NBL's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 484 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. NBL: 1.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
NBL' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 1.10 Max: 1.84
Current: 1.26
0.66
1.84
Quick Ratio 1.20
NBL's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 484 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. NBL: 1.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
NBL' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 1.06 Max: 1.75
Current: 1.2
0.64
1.75
Days Inventory 31.48
NBL's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
59% of the 208 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 23.74 vs. NBL: 31.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
NBL' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23.68  Med: 31.68 Max: 52.92
Current: 31.48
23.68
52.92
Days Sales Outstanding 52.38
NBL's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
62% of the 393 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 41.39 vs. NBL: 52.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
NBL' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 39.58  Med: 66.71 Max: 75.95
Current: 52.38
39.58
75.95
Days Payable 306.11
NBL's Days Payable is ranked higher than
85% of the 253 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 83.92 vs. NBL: 306.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
NBL' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 238.26  Med: 393.13 Max: 546.48
Current: 306.11
238.26
546.48

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 1.78
NBL's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
84% of the 322 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.84 vs. NBL: 1.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
NBL' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.84 Max: 2.61
Current: 1.78
0.23
2.61
Dividend Growth (3y) 16.50
NBL's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
81% of the 97 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.20 vs. NBL: 16.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
NBL' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 14.80 Max: 63.9
Current: 16.5
0
63.9
Forward Dividend Yield 1.12
NBL's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
87% of the 248 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.14 vs. NBL: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 3.75
NBL's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
60% of the 397 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.89 vs. NBL: 3.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
NBL' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 1.77 Max: 5.51
Current: 3.75
0.49
5.51
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -3.80
NBL's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
64% of the 387 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.90 vs. NBL: -3.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
NBL' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.3  Med: -0.90 Max: 1.9
Current: -3.8
-16.3
1.9

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 1.48
NBL's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
67% of the 404 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. NBL: 1.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
NBL' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.36  Med: 2.43 Max: 3.78
Current: 1.48
1.36
3.78
Price/Projected FCF 10.57
NBL's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
94% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. NBL: 10.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
NBL' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.87  Med: 2.25 Max: 26.06
Current: 10.57
0.87
26.06
Price/Median PS Value 1.10
NBL's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
79% of the 359 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.57 vs. NBL: 1.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
NBL' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.71 Max: 1.3
Current: 1.1
0.34
1.3
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -8.82
NBL's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
56% of the 497 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.70 vs. NBL: -8.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
NBL' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.2  Med: 7.10 Max: 27.8
Current: -8.82
1.2
27.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -9.19
NBL's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
55% of the 173 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -12.64 vs. NBL: -9.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
NBL' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11.1  Med: 12.80 Max: 47.8
Current: -9.19
-11.1
47.8

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $3136
EPS $ -5.70
Beta1.17
Short Percentage of Float3.80%
52-Week Range $23.77 - 52.69
Shares Outstanding(Mil)428.84

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue(Mil) 3,129 3,882 5,217
EPS($) -1.15 -0.91 -0.41
EPS without NRI($) -1.15 -0.91 -0.41

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:OTCPK:SLGYY, NYSE:COP, HKSE:00883, NYSE:OXY, NYSE:EOG, TSX:CNQ » details
Traded in other countries:NB6.Germany,
Noble Energy Inc is a Delaware corporation, incorporated in 1969. The Company is a independent energy company engaged in crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) exploration and production. Its portfolio is diversified between short-term and long-term projects, both onshore and offshore, domestic and international. The Company operates in five core areas: the DJ Basin (onshore US); the Marcellus Shale (onshore US); the deepwater Gulf of Mexico (offshore US); offshore West Africa; and offshore Eastern Mediterranean that provide almost all of its crude oil, natural gas and NGL production; visible growth from development projects; and exploration opportunities. The Company manages its operations by regions grouped into four components that are all in the business of crude oil, natural gas and NGL exploration, development, and acquisition: the United States; West Africa (Equatorial Guinea, Cameroon, Gabon, Sierra Leone, and Senegal/Guinea-Bissau; Eastern Mediterranean (Israel and Cyprus); and Other International and Corporate.
» More Articles for NBL

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Feb 09 2016 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Feb 09 2016 
FPA Capital Fund 4th Quarter Commentary Jan 28 2016 
Companies With High Dividend Yields in FPA Capital Fund's Portfolio Jan 12 2016 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Noble Energy Dec 09 2015 
FPA Capital Sells Stakes in Oil and Gas Companies Oct 13 2015 
FPA Capital Invests in Three New Stakes Oct 12 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: NBL, WFM, FLR, LPL Aug 04 2015 
FPA Capital Fund Sells Portions of 13 Stakes in Second Quarter Jul 13 2015 
Stanley Druckenmiller's Top 5 New Stocks May 25 2015 

More From Other Websites
Understanding Rice Energy’s Production Guidance and Key Management Strategies Apr 28 2016
Noble Energy’s Production Guidance for 2016 Apr 28 2016
What to Expect from Noble Energy’s 1Q16 Earnings Apr 28 2016
NOBLE ENERGY INC Files SEC form 8-K, Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Apr 27 2016
Noble Energy Declares Quarterly Dividend Apr 25 2016
Noble Energy Declares Quarterly Dividend Apr 25 2016
Despite Rally, UBS Only Likes 4 Large Cap Exploration and Production Energy Stocks Apr 25 2016
CONE Midstream Increases Quarterly Cash Distribution Apr 21 2016
Credit Suisse's 5 Large-Cap Oil Stock Favorites Ahead of Earnings Apr 21 2016
Noble Seeks To Sell Off 15 Percent Of Leviathan Gas Field Apr 19 2016
Oil Stocks: Risk-Reward is Too 'Compelling' To Pass Up For Long-Term Investors, Morgan Stanley Says Apr 19 2016
Oil Stocks: The Best Defense is…a Good Defense Apr 18 2016
CalPERS seeks support to make Noble Energy report on climate change Apr 13 2016
CalPERS asks Noble Energy investors to vote for climate change report Apr 13 2016
IIROC Trading Resumption - NBL.P Apr 13 2016
IIROC Trading Resumption - NBL.P Apr 13 2016
Nobelium Tech Corp. completes initial public offering Apr 13 2016
IIROC Trading Halt - CXM; PEO; NBL.P Apr 13 2016
IIROC Trading Halt - CXM; PEO; NBL.P Apr 13 2016
Have We Seen The Bottom In Oil Prices? Apr 12 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK