Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt No Debt
NEA's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
92% of the 536 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 4.18 vs. NEA: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
NEA' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: No Debt  Med: No Debt Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity to Asset 0.69
NEA's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
75% of the 319 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 0.41 vs. NEA: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
NEA' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.65  Med: 0.66 Max: 0.69
Current: 0.69
0.65
0.69
Interest Coverage 21.94
NEA's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
63% of the 461 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. NEA: 21.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NEA' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.78  Med: 8.59 Max: 25.29
Current: 21.94
4.78
25.29
F-Score: 5
WACC vs ROIC
1.26%
4.89%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 78.95
NEA's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
95% of the 343 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 3.68 vs. NEA: 78.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
NEA' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 78.95  Med: 81.81 Max: 86.1
Current: 78.95
78.95
86.1
Net-margin (%) 140.34
NEA's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
97% of the 346 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 2.25 vs. NEA: 140.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
NEA' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -216.96  Med: 94.98 Max: 227.37
Current: 140.34
-216.96
227.37
ROE (%) 8.66
NEA's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
75% of the 435 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 1.55 vs. NEA: 8.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
NEA' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.02  Med: 6.4 Max: 15.34
Current: 8.66
-14.02
15.34
ROA (%) 5.86
NEA's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
89% of the 541 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: -0.37 vs. NEA: 5.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
NEA' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.2  Med: 4.27 Max: 10.07
Current: 5.86
-9.2
10.07
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 0.60
NEA's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
51% of the 281 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 0.80 vs. NEA: 0.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NEA' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -0.5 Max: 0.6
Current: 0.6
0
0.6
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -0.40
NEA's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
57% of the 310 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 4.10 vs. NEA: -0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NEA' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -2.1 Max: -0.4
Current: -0.4
» NEA's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Equity & Asset
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2015

NEA Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Murray Stahl 12,954 sh (-26.58%)
» More
Q4 2015

NEA Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Murray Stahl 11,954 sh (-7.72%)
» More
Q1 2016

NEA Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Murray Stahl 12,150 sh (+1.64%)
» More
Q2 2016

NEA Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Murray Stahl 13,483 sh (+10.97%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NEA

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Preferred stocks of Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Income Fund

SymbolPriceYieldDescription
NEAPRC0.001.89Nuveen Tax-Free --- Munifund Term Pfd Shs Series -2015-

Business Description

Industry: Conglomerates » Conglomerates
Compare:OTCPK:AEEX, OTCPK:DSGUY, NYSE:CODI, NAS:SRAQ, OTCPK:NSHBY, OTCPK:MITCF, OTCPK:NOBGF, OTCPK:AIOM, NAS:EAGL, NAS:PACE, NYSE:REX, NAS:GRSH, OTCPK:THAFF, NAS:BLVD, NAS:QPAC, NAS:CLAC, NYSE:SPLP, OTCPK:IINX, OTCPK:CGWB, NAS:AUMA » details
The company is an investment fund. Its investment objectives are to provide tax-free income and to enhance portfolio value relative to the municipal bond market by investing in tax-exempt municipal bonds.

The company is an investment fund. Its investment objectives are to provide tax-free income and to enhance portfolio value relative to the municipal bond market by investing in tax-exempt municipal bonds.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 11.21
NEA's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
68% of the 260 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 17.40 vs. NEA: 11.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
NEA' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.76  Med: 17.72 Max: 30.98
Current: 11.21
5.76
30.98
PE(NRI) 11.21
NEA's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
70% of the 258 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 17.33 vs. NEA: 11.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
NEA' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.76  Med: 17.72 Max: 30.98
Current: 11.21
5.76
30.98
P/B 0.95
NEA's P/B is ranked higher than
64% of the 403 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. NEA: 0.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
NEA' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 0.95 Max: 1.08
Current: 0.95
0.76
1.08
P/S 15.32
NEA's P/S is ranked lower than
86% of the 320 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 1.01 vs. NEA: 15.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
NEA' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.6  Med: 14.27 Max: 16.92
Current: 15.32
5.6
16.92
POCF 17.11
NEA's POCF is ranked lower than
66% of the 149 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 9.56 vs. NEA: 17.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
NEA' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.22  Med: 16.46 Max: 20.01
Current: 17.11
13.22
20.01
EV-to-EBIT 19.12
NEA's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
63% of the 256 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 14.25 vs. NEA: 19.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
NEA' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.8  Med: 17.3 Max: 20.4
Current: 19.12
6.8
20.4
EV-to-EBITDA 19.12
NEA's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
67% of the 264 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 11.79 vs. NEA: 19.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
NEA' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.8  Med: 17.3 Max: 20.4
Current: 19.12
6.8
20.4

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 5.03
NEA's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
81% of the 294 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 2.55 vs. NEA: 5.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
NEA' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.87  Med: 5.49 Max: 7.14
Current: 5.03
2.87
7.14
Dividend Payout 0.58
NEA's Dividend Payout is ranked lower than
71% of the 169 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. NEA: 0.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
NEA' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.58 Max: 1.49
Current: 0.58
0.12
1.49
Dividend Growth (3y) -4.80
NEA's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked lower than
65% of the 137 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 5.50 vs. NEA: -4.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
NEA' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.6  Med: -4.8 Max: -2.7
Current: -4.8
-20.6
-2.7
Forward Dividend Yield 5.56
NEA's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
81% of the 284 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 2.58 vs. NEA: 5.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 3.37
NEA's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
53% of the 361 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 3.00 vs. NEA: 3.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
NEA' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.92  Med: 3.68 Max: 4.78
Current: 3.37
1.92
4.78
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -52.50
NEA's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
85% of the 192 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: -3.20 vs. NEA: -52.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
NEA' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -52.5  Med: -52.5 Max: -52.5
Current: -52.5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.95
NEA's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
67% of the 387 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 1.51 vs. NEA: 0.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
NEA' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.89  Med: 0.94 Max: 1.02
Current: 0.95
0.89
1.02
Price/Graham Number 0.68
NEA's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
72% of the 213 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 0.95 vs. NEA: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
NEA' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 0.68 Max: 1.66
Current: 0.68
0.5
1.66
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 5.20
NEA's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
67% of the 493 Companies
in the Global Conglomerates industry.

( Industry Median: 0.30 vs. NEA: 5.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
NEA' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.9  Med: 5.8 Max: 14.8
Current: 5.2
4.9
14.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $73.41
EPS (TTM) $ 1.31
Beta-0.05
Short Percentage of Float0.05%
52-Week Range $12.94 - 15.22
Shares Outstanding (Mil)78.88
» More Articles for NEA

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
No related article found.

More From Other Websites
NUVEEN AMT-FREE QUALITY MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND Financials Sep 17 2016
Two Nuveen Municipal Closed-End Funds Declare First Post-Merger Monthly Distributions Sep 16 2016
Two Nuveen Municipal Closed-End Funds Declare Post-Merger Distributions Sep 12 2016
Nuveen Announces Completion of Two Municipal Closed-End Fund Mergers Sep 12 2016
Nine Nuveen Municipal Closed-End Funds Declare Pre-Merger Distributions Aug 30 2016
Nuveen Announces Shareholder Approval of Two Municipal Closed-End Fund Mergers Aug 22 2016
Nearmap Ltd. :NEA-AU: Earnings Analysis: For the six months ended December 31, 2015 : August 4, 2016 Aug 04 2016
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Declare Distributions Aug 01 2016
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Declare Distributions Jul 01 2016
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Declare Distributions Jun 01 2016
Four Nuveen Municipal Closed-End Funds Complete Private Issuances of Preferred Securities Jun 01 2016
Moody's downgrades the short-term ratings of three series of Variable Rate Demand Preferred (VRDP)... May 27 2016
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Declare Distributions May 02 2016
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Declare Distributions Apr 01 2016
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Declare Distributions Mar 01 2016
Nuveen Fund Board Approves Closed-End Fund Investment Policy Changes and Recommends Fund Mergers Feb 05 2016
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Declare Distributions Feb 01 2016
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Declare Distributions Jan 04 2016
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Declare Distributions Dec 01 2015
Several Nuveen Closed-End Funds Declare Capital Gains Dec 01 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)