Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 4.37
NOAH's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
72% of the 1206 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. NOAH: 4.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 4.37  Med: 10000.00 Max: No Debt
Current: 4.37
Equity to Asset 0.65
NOAH's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
70% of the 1257 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.86 vs. NOAH: 0.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.55  Med: 0.80 Max: 0.89
Current: 0.65
0.55
0.89
Interest Coverage No Debt
NOAH's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
56% of the 1128 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 10000.00 vs. NOAH: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 9999.99  Med: 10000.00 Max: 9999.99
Current: No Debt
F-Score: 3
Z-Score: 6.15
WACC vs ROIC
2.27%
190.99%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 34.67
NOAH's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
58% of the 1355 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 50.77 vs. NOAH: 34.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: 29.81  Med: 35.48 Max: 41.42
Current: 34.67
29.81
41.42
Net-margin (%) 29.95
NOAH's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
58% of the 1363 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 46.28 vs. NOAH: 29.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: 25.05  Med: 29.83 Max: 33.22
Current: 29.95
25.05
33.22
ROE (%) 25.61
NOAH's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 1405 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 6.00 vs. NOAH: 25.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: 13.66  Med: 16.66 Max: 27.69
Current: 25.61
13.66
27.69
ROA (%) 18.58
NOAH's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 1425 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.70 vs. NOAH: 18.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: 11.82  Med: 14.54 Max: 20.23
Current: 18.58
11.82
20.23
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 641.92
NOAH's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
76% of the 910 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 42.33 vs. NOAH: 641.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 585.72  Med: 859.18 Max: 2231.15
Current: 641.92
585.72
2231.15
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 51.20
NOAH's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
88% of the 771 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 5.50 vs. NOAH: 51.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 43.4  Med: 51.20 Max: 53
Current: 51.2
43.4
53
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 53.10
NOAH's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
86% of the 640 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.70 vs. NOAH: 53.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 39.1  Med: 48.40 Max: 53.1
Current: 53.1
39.1
53.1
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 45.00
NOAH's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
82% of the 625 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. NOAH: 45.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 45  Med: 45.30 Max: 60.1
Current: 45
45
60.1
» NOAH's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2014

NOAH Guru Trades in Q2 2014

Chuck Royce 38,300 sh (unchged)
» More
Q3 2014

NOAH Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Chuck Royce 16,700 sh (-56.40%)
» More
Q4 2014

NOAH Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Chuck Royce 16,700 sh (unchged)
» More
Q1 2015

NOAH Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Chuck Royce 16,700 sh (unchged)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NOAH

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 17.23
NOAH's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
62% of the 986 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 13.00 vs. NOAH: 17.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 10.66  Med: 19.35 Max: 91.6
Current: 17.23
10.66
91.6
Forward P/E 17.36
NOAH's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
77% of the 208 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 12.84 vs. NOAH: 17.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 17.60
NOAH's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
62% of the 981 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 13.10 vs. NOAH: 17.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year PE(NRI) Range
Min: 10.62  Med: 18.47 Max: 91.18
Current: 17.6
10.62
91.18
P/B 4.06
NOAH's P/B is ranked lower than
91% of the 1357 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.95 vs. NOAH: 4.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
NOAH' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 1.41  Med: 3.22 Max: 8.5
Current: 4.06
1.41
8.5
P/S 4.84
NOAH's P/S is ranked higher than
61% of the 1230 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 7.43 vs. NOAH: 4.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
NOAH' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 3.31  Med: 5.44 Max: 26.75
Current: 4.84
3.31
26.75
EV-to-EBIT 11.37
NOAH's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
59% of the 974 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 14.26 vs. NOAH: 11.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
NOAH' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 4.1  Med: 11.10 Max: 64.4
Current: 11.37
4.1
64.4
PEG 0.33
NOAH's PEG is ranked higher than
81% of the 167 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. NOAH: 0.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
NOAH' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.24  Med: 0.34 Max: 0.42
Current: 0.33
0.24
0.42
Current Ratio 4.62
NOAH's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
53% of the 896 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.99 vs. NOAH: 4.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 3.28  Med: 4.97 Max: 10.35
Current: 4.62
3.28
10.35
Quick Ratio 4.62
NOAH's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
53% of the 896 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.93 vs. NOAH: 4.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 3.28  Med: 4.97 Max: 10.35
Current: 4.62
3.28
10.35
Days Sales Outstanding 30.90
NOAH's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
55% of the 959 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 36.39 vs. NOAH: 30.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 1.48  Med: 17.52 Max: 42.34
Current: 30.9
1.48
42.34

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 1.14
NOAH's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
89% of the 1475 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.77 vs. NOAH: 1.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.79 Max: 3.24
Current: 1.14
0.58
3.24
Yield on cost (5-Year) 1.14
NOAH's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
90% of the 1488 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.45 vs. NOAH: 1.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.79 Max: 3.24
Current: 1.14
0.58
3.24
Share Buyback Rate 0.30
NOAH's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
65% of the 835 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: -0.90 vs. NOAH: 0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 0.3  Med: -13.70 Max: -18.6
Current: 0.3

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Cash 7.96
NOAH's Price/Net Cash is ranked lower than
63% of the 368 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.32 vs. NOAH: 7.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Cash only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Price/Net Cash Range
Min: 1.76  Med: 4.32 Max: 9.18
Current: 7.96
1.76
9.18
Price/Net Current Asset Value 5.44
NOAH's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
57% of the 421 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.70 vs. NOAH: 5.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Price/Net Current Asset Value Range
Min: 1.5  Med: 3.46 Max: 8.77
Current: 5.44
1.5
8.77
Price/Tangible Book 4.01
NOAH's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
88% of the 1305 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.95 vs. NOAH: 4.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 1.41  Med: 3.09 Max: 8.28
Current: 4.01
1.41
8.28
Price/Median PS Value 0.95
NOAH's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
62% of the 1010 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. NOAH: 0.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.6  Med: 0.96 Max: 4.77
Current: 0.95
0.6
4.77
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 0.69
NOAH's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked higher than
52% of the 140 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.70 vs. NOAH: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.7  Med: 0.70 Max: 0.7
Current: 0.69
Price/Graham Number 1.76
NOAH's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
84% of the 808 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.74 vs. NOAH: 1.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 0.95  Med: 1.51 Max: 6.56
Current: 1.76
0.95
6.56
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 8.75
NOAH's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 1353 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.60 vs. NOAH: 8.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 1.6  Med: 9.00 Max: 24.6
Current: 8.75
1.6
24.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 65.03
NOAH's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Asset Management industry.

( Industry Median: 6.51 vs. NOAH: 65.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
NOAH' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: 64.9  Med: 64.90 Max: 65.1
Current: 65.03
64.9
65.1

Business Description

Industry: Asset Management » Asset Management
Compare: » details
Traded in other countries:6NO.Germany,
Noah Holdings Ltd was incorporated in Cayman Islands on June 29, 2007. The Company is an independent service provider focusing on distributing wealth management products to the high net worth population in China. It provides direct access to China's high net worth population. With 569 relationship managers in 57 branch offices as of December 31, 2013, its coverage network encompasses the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta and the Bohai Rim. Through this extensive coverage network, it serves three types of clients: (i) high net worth individuals; (ii) enterprises affiliated with high net worth individuals and (iii) wholesale clients, local commercial banks or branches of national commercial banks which distribute wealth management products to their own clients. The Company's product choices currently consist exclusively of OTC products originated in China and designed to cater to the needs of high net worth population. It includes fixed income products, private equity funds and securities investment funds. Fixed income products mainly include collateralized fixed income products sponsored by trust companies and other products that provide investors with fixed rates of return; Private equity funds products, include investments in private equity funds sponsored by domestic and internal fund management firms; securities investment funds, which are privately raised funds investing in publicly traded stocks. The Company generates revenues from one-time commissions and recurring service fees paid by third-party product providers or, for the majority of fixed income products, by the underlying corporate borrowers. The Company competes with China Merchants Bank, China Minsheng Bank and China Everbright Bank.
» More Articles for NOAH

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
4 Cheapest Financial Dividend Stocks from the Top Performing YTD List Jul 10 2013 

More From Other Websites
Swiss bank UBP sees its China fund business doubling by year-end Jul 31 2015
Noah Announces Strategic Cooperation with Union Bancaire Privee to Bolster Global Capabilities Jul 30 2015
Noah Announces Strategic Cooperation with Union Bancaire Privee to Bolster Global Capabilities Jul 30 2015
Renaissance, Sequoia: Why Qihoo 360 Needs To Go Back To China Jul 30 2015
U.S.-Listed China Stocks Slide As Shanghai Crashes Jul 27 2015
Noah Holdings Limited to Announce Second Quarter 2015 Financial Results on Monday, August 3, 2015 Jul 21 2015
Noah Holdings Limited to Announce Second Quarter 2015 Financial Results on Monday, August 3, 2015 Jul 21 2015
BlackRock Crushes Q2 Earnings Forecasts Jul 15 2015
Noah Holdings Limited Announces US$50 Million Share Repurchase Program Jul 13 2015
China Stock Roundup: Mindray Medical to Buy Remaining Stake in Dragonbio, Noah Holdings Announces... Jul 09 2015
Top Chinese Stocks Massively Higher in New York Jul 09 2015
Stock Futures Bulk Up Before Open; Sinopec, Noah Lead China Rebound Jul 09 2015
Noah Holdings Limited Announces US$50 Million Share Repurchase Program Jul 08 2015
Noah Holdings Limited Announces New Cooperation to Build Global Family Office Solution Jul 08 2015
Noah Holdings Limited Announces New Cooperation to Build Global Family Office Solution Jul 08 2015
Huawei's Sun Yafang Repeats Atop New Forbes China Power Women Ranking Jul 05 2015
Stocks Hold Early Gains; ConAgra Leaps Near High Jun 30 2015
Shanghai/Shenzhen Sell-Off Levies Mixed Effect In U.S. Jun 26 2015
U.S.-Traded China Stocks Sink As Shanghai Plunges Jun 26 2015
Momo: Take-Private No. 24; Follow Sequoia Capital For Buyout Targets Jun 23 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK