Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Switzerland, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.88
NUS's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
54% of the 1576 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. NUS: 0.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NUS' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46  Med: 1.13 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.88
Equity-to-Asset 0.45
NUS's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
62% of the 1540 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. NUS: 0.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NUS' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 0.5 Max: 0.65
Current: 0.45
0.27
0.65
Interest Coverage N/A
NUS's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
87% of the 1370 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 19.63 vs. NUS: N/A )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NUS' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.54  Med: 116.7 Max: N/A
Current: N/A
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 5.88
Beneish M-Score: -3.07
WACC vs ROIC
4.80%
20.63%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 10.47
NUS's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
70% of the 1561 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 5.68 vs. NUS: 10.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NUS' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.13  Med: 12.35 Max: 17.44
Current: 10.47
6.13
17.44
Net Margin % 6.48
NUS's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
65% of the 1565 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 3.98 vs. NUS: 6.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NUS' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.79  Med: 7.06 Max: 11.49
Current: 6.48
3.79
11.49
ROE % 17.99
NUS's ROE % is ranked higher than
80% of the 1523 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 8.16 vs. NUS: 17.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NUS' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.77  Med: 24.04 Max: 50.36
Current: 17.99
14.77
50.36
ROA % 8.92
NUS's ROA % is ranked higher than
78% of the 1600 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 3.84 vs. NUS: 8.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NUS' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.51  Med: 11.67 Max: 24.77
Current: 8.92
6.51
24.77
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 44.33
NUS's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
85% of the 1587 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 13.34 vs. NUS: 44.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NUS' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 41.48  Med: 107.46 Max: 177.08
Current: 44.33
41.48
177.08
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -8.70
NUS's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
81% of the 1341 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 2.50 vs. NUS: -8.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NUS' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.7  Med: 8.5 Max: 33
Current: -8.7
-8.7
33
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -17.40
NUS's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
85% of the 1162 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. NUS: -17.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NUS' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20  Med: 3.1 Max: 47.4
Current: -17.4
-20
47.4
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -24.60
NUS's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
83% of the 1041 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 5.40 vs. NUS: -24.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NUS' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -24.6  Med: 5.7 Max: 46.6
Current: -24.6
-24.6
46.6
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Nu Skin Enterprises Inc $NUS.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NUS's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-03)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

NUS Guru Trades in Q1 2016

David Dreman 306 sh (New)
Bestinfond Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Chuck Royce 1,233,357 sh (-10.16%)
» More
Q2 2016

NUS Guru Trades in Q2 2016

David Dreman 306 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 870,993 sh (-29.38%)
» More
Q3 2016

NUS Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 16,103 sh (New)
Jim Simons 54,100 sh (New)
David Dreman 306 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 146,792 sh (-83.15%)
» More
Q4 2016

NUS Guru Trades in Q4 2016

John Hussman 2,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 200,100 sh (+269.87%)
David Dreman 306 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones 11,100 sh (-31.07%)
Chuck Royce 35,100 sh (-76.09%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NUS

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Consumer Packaged Goods » Household & Personal Products    NAICS: 424210    SIC: 5122
Compare:NAS:HELE, OTCPK:ORFLY, OTCPK:PGENY, NYSE:AVP, NYSE:EPC, NYSE:REV, NYSE:USNA, OTCPK:BLMMF, NYSE:ELF, NAS:IPAR, OTCPK:MDOMF, OTCPK:ASLEF, OTCPK:KSRYY, OTCPK:LIOPF, NYSE:HLF, NAS:RDEN, NAS:NHTC, AMEX:TIS, NAS:NATR, AMEX:ACU » details
Traded in other countries:NUS.Germany, NUS.Switzerland, 0R1U.UK,
Headquarter Location:USA
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc develops and distributes consumer products including beauty and wellness solutions. It develops anti-aging personal care products and nutritional supplements under its Nu Skin and Pharmanex category brands.

Nu Skin Enterprises is a health and beauty direct-selling company with a comprehensive product line: anti-aging skin products; peels, masks, and scrubs; moisturizers; body care; hair care; men's care; oral care; sun protection; and cosmetics. The company has three main product divisions: anti-aging, skin, and pharmaceuticals. The pharmaceuticals division offers nutritionals, weight-management products, and food supplements. The company has operations internationally, in more than 50 countries across the Americas, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific.

Top Ranked Articles about Nu Skin Enterprises Inc

This World-Class Beauty Products Maker Rallies Forward Nu Skin Enterprises raises its revenue guidance
Nu Skin Enterprises (NYSE:NUS) is a $2 billion direct selling company that markets premium quality personal care, nutrition and technology products through a global network of approximately 1 million Actives and Sales Leaders.  Read more...
Nautilus Releases a NI 43-101 Technical Report for Polymetallic Nodules

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - Jul 4, 2016) - Nautilus Minerals Inc. (TSX:NUS)(OTCQX:NUSMF) (OTC:NUSMF Nasdaq Intl Designation) (the "Company" or "Nautilus") announces that it has filed on SEDAR a technical report in respect of the Clarion Clipperton Zone Project being undertaken by its wholly owned subsidiary Tonga Offshore Mining Limited (TOML), entitled "NI 43-101 Technical Report TOML Clarion Clipperton Zone Project, Pacific Ocean" (Technical Report).
The Technical Report describes in detail the upgrade and increase in the Mineral Resource estimate for TOML's polymetallic nodule project that the Company announced on May 26, 2016 (see links section below). The Technical Report also provides more information regarding the exploration, technical aspects and historical work completed in the Clarion Clipperton Zone. Links:
http://www.nautilusminerals.com/irm/PDF/1797/NautilusUpgradesandIncreasesCCZMineralResourcetoover685milliontonnes The Technical Report has been filed on www.sedar.com and is also available on the Company's website at this link: http://www.nautilusminerals.com/IRM/ShowCategory.aspx?CategoryId=306&FilterStyle=B&archive=true&masterpage=311&year=2013&RID=402 For more information please refer to www.nautilusminerals.com. Neither the TSX nor the OTCQX accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release. About Nautilus Minerals Inc. Nautilus is the first company to explore the ocean floor for polymetallic seafloor massive sulphide deposits. Nautilus was granted the first mining lease for such deposits at the prospect known as Solwara 1, in the territorial waters of Papua New Guinea, where it is aiming to produce copper, gold and silver. The Company has also been granted its environmental permit for this site. Nautilus also holds highly prospective exploration acreage in the western Pacific (granted and under application), as well as in international waters in the Central Pacific. A Canadian registered company, Nautilus is listed on the TSX:NUS stock exchange and trades on the OTCQX:NUSMF, and is also a member of the Nasdaq International Designation program. Its corporate office is in Brisbane, Australia. Its major shareholders include MB Holding Company LLC, an Oman based group with interests in mining, oil & gas, which holds a 27% interest and Metalloinvest, the largest iron ore producer in Europe and the CIS, which has a 15% holding (each on a non-diluted basis, excluding loan shares outstanding under the Company's share loan plan).






Nautilus Minerals Inc. (Toronto)
Investor Relations
1 (416) 551 1100
[email protected]
www.nautilusminerals.com
Principal American Liaison
Euro Pacific Capital, Inc.
88 Post Road West, 2nd Floor
Westport, CT 06880
1-203-662-9700
Attn: Thomas Tan [email protected]




Read more...
Nautilus Minerals Provides Update

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - Jun 29, 2016) - Nautilus Minerals Inc. (TSX:NUS)(OTCQX:NUSMF)(OTC:NUSMF Nasdaq Intl Designation) (the "Company" or "Nautilus") announces that, further to the Company's news release dated April 8, 2016, the Company continues to seek and consider various alternative sources of financing in order to maintain the development of the Solwara 1 Project and the Company's operations. As previously disclosed, the Company requires significant additional funding in order to complete the build and deployment of the seafloor production system to be utilized at the Solwara 1 Project by the Company and its joint venture partner (as to 15%), the Independent State of Papua New Guinea's nominee.
In view of the Company's funding requirements, the Company and its operating subsidiaries are currently exploring alternatives for delaying project spending and securing immediate bridge financing to facilitate the time required to secure the significant additional project funding that is needed and/or to explore alternative transactions aimed at maximizing shareholder value. Any such bridge financing may include a loan facility provided by a major shareholder of the Company on commercial terms for such a facility with security over certain of the Company's assets.
There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to obtain the necessary bridge financing or project financing on acceptable terms or at all. Failure to secure bridge financing and/or project financing may result in the Company taking various steps aimed at maximizing shareholder value, including suspending or terminating the development of the seafloor production system and the Solwara 1 Project, and engaging in various transactions including, without limitation, asset sales, joint ventures and capital restructurings. The Company's independent directors will be looking to engage a financial advisor to assist them in this process. There can be no assurances that any transaction will result from these matters and the Company will provide updates as circumstances warrant. Any transaction(s) will be subject to all necessary stock exchange and, if applicable, shareholder approvals as well as compliance with all other regulatory requirements.
The Company previously disclosed that the construction and development of the entire seafloor production system for initial deployment and testing operations at the Solwara 1 Project, was scheduled to occur during the first quarter of 2018 based on the Company's project timetable and subject to securing additional project funding. However, since, as indicated above, the necessary additional project funding has not been secured, the Company now believes that, in the event that the required funding is secured and the Company is able to continue development of the Solwara 1 Project, the schedule would be delayed but the Company is unable to determine the extent of the delay at this time. The Company will provide updates as circumstances warrant. For more information please refer to www.nautilusminerals.com. Links: http://www.nautilusminerals.com/irm/PDF/1737/NautilusAnnouncesClosingofRightsOffering Neither the TSX nor the OTCQX accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release.
About Nautilus Minerals Inc. Nautilus is the first company to explore the ocean floor for polymetallic seafloor massive sulphide deposits. Nautilus was granted the first mining lease for such deposits at the prospect known as Solwara 1, in the territorial waters of Papua New Guinea, where it is aiming to produce copper, gold and silver. The Company has also been granted its environmental permit for this site. Nautilus also holds highly prospective exploration acreage in the western Pacific (granted and under application), as well as in international waters in the Central Pacific. A Canadian registered company, Nautilus is listed on the TSX:NUS stock exchange and trades on the OTCQX:NUSMF, and is also a member of the Nasdaq International Designation program. Its corporate office is in Brisbane, Australia. Its major shareholders include MB Holding Company LLC, an Oman based group with interests in mining, oil & gas, which holds a 27% interest and Metalloinvest, the largest iron ore producer in Europe and the CIS, which has a 15% holding (each on a non-diluted basis, excluding loan shares outstanding under the Company's share loan plan).





Nautilus Minerals Inc. (Toronto)
Investor Relations
1 (416) 551 1100
[email protected]
www.nautilusminerals.com
Principal American Liaison
Euro Pacific Capital, Inc.
88 Post Road West, 2nd Floor
Westport, CT 06880
1-203-662-9700
Attn: Thomas Tan [email protected]




Read more...
High Yield and Profitability: Sturm Ruger, Infosys Strong returns over the past 5 years and a high yield
Thanks to Gurufocus’ All-In-One Screener, I want to highlight stocks that have a growing dividend yield with sustainable payout ratio. This sustainability is confirmed to long-term company profitability and a very strong financial situation: Read more...
Nautilus Minerals AGM Voting Results

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - Jun 1, 2016) - Nautilus Minerals Inc. (TSX:NUS)(OTCQX:NUSMF)(OTC:NUSMF Nasdaq Intl Designation) (the "Company" or "Nautilus") announces the results of its Annual General Meeting (AGM) held today in Toronto, Ontario, at which 26.28% of the issued shares were represented. Shareholders voted strongly in favour of all resolutions brought before them. Russell Debney, Nautilus' Chairman said "I am delighted with the progress we have made in the past year on the build of the seafloor production equipment. We accepted delivery of the Seafloor Production Tools, commenced Factory Acceptance Testing on the Subsea Slurry Lift Pump while also progressing the build of our Production Support Vessel which now has over 88% of the steel cut." The Company provides the following report on the voting results of the matters considered at the AGM, the particulars of which are set out in more detail in the Company's Information Circular, filed on SEDAR on May 3, 2016:

Election of Directors: Russell Debney, Cynthia Thomas, Dr Mohammed Al Barwani, Tariq Al Barwani and Mark Horn were re-elected as Directors of the Company for the ensuing year.
Appointment and Remuneration of Auditor: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were re-appointed the auditor of the Company for the ensuing year and the Directors were authorised to fix their remuneration.

The proxy results of voting in respect of the directors were as follows:


Mohammed Al Barwani

Votes For: 99.61%

Votes Withheld: 0.39%

Russell Debney

Votes For: 99.70%

Votes Withheld: 0.30%







Tariq Al Barwani

Votes For: 99.61%

Votes Withheld: 0.39%

Cynthia Thomas

Votes For: 99.52%

Votes Withheld: 0.48%









Mark Horn

Votes For: 99.82%

Votes Withheld: 0.18%



Neither the TSX nor the OTCQX accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release. About Nautilus Minerals Inc. Nautilus is the first company to explore the ocean floor for polymetallic seafloor massive sulphide deposits. Nautilus was granted the first mining lease for such deposits at the prospect known as Solwara 1, in the territorial waters of Papua New Guinea, where it is aiming to produce copper, gold and silver. The Company has also been granted its environmental permit for this site. Nautilus also holds highly prospective exploration acreage in the western Pacific (granted and under application), as well as in international waters in the Central Pacific. A Canadian registered company, Nautilus is listed on the TSX:NUS stock exchange and trades on the OTCQX:NUSMF, and is also a member of the Nasdaq International Designation program. Its corporate office is in Brisbane, Australia. Its major shareholders include MB Holding Company LLC, an Oman based group with interests in mining, oil & gas, which holds a 27% interest and Metalloinvest, the largest iron ore producer in Europe and the CIS, which has a 15% holding (each on a non-diluted basis, excluding loan shares outstanding under the Company's share loan plan).





Nautilus Minerals Inc. (Toronto)
Investor Relations
1 (416) 551 1100
[email protected]
www.nautilusminerals.com
Principal American Liaison
Euro Pacific Capital, Inc.
88 Post Road West, 2nd Floor
Westport, CT 06880
1-203-662-9700
Attn: Thomas Tan [email protected]




Read more...
Nautilus Minerals Chairman Retires

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - May 27, 2016) - Nautilus Minerals Inc. (TSX:NUS)(OTCQX:NUSMF)(OTC:NUSMF Nasdaq Intl Designation) (the "Company" or "Nautilus") announces that Mr. A. Geoffrey Loudon has advised the Board that he is retiring and will not stand for re-election at the upcoming Annual General Meeting on June 1, 2016 (the "AGM"). Mr. Loudon has enjoyed a long history with Nautilus, having been Chairman of the Board of Directors since the Company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange in 2006 and for the 10 years prior to that, having been a founding investor and active participant in the strategic development and growth of the Company. Nautilus' President & CEO, Mike Johnston, commented, "I wish to thank Geoff for his steadfast dedication to the Company and continued support of Nautilus' staff over these many years. We wish him all the best as he commences a well deserved retirement." As Mr. Loudon is retiring and not standing for re-election, the Board of Directors has, effective immediately, appointed Mr. Russell Debney as interim Chairman in place of Mr. Loudon. Mr Debney has been a director of the Company since it listed in 2006. He was Chairman of Nautilus Minerals Niugini Limited and Nautilus Minerals Oceania Limited prior to their acquisition by the Company and, along with Mr. Loudon, has been involved with Nautilus almost since its inception. The directors have also resolved to fix the number of directors to be elected at the AGM at five (5). The Board of Directors intend to embark upon a thorough recruitment process to appoint a new independent Director to the Board following the AGM. In the meantime, the current members of the Board of Directors of the Company who will stand for re-election at the AGM are as follows:

Russell Debney
Cynthia Thomas
Dr. Mohammed Al Barwani
Mark Horn
Tariq Al Barwani

Neither the TSX nor the OTCQX accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release. About Nautilus Minerals Inc. Nautilus is the first company to explore the ocean floor for polymetallic seafloor massive sulphide deposits. Nautilus was granted the first mining lease for such deposits at the prospect known as Solwara 1, in the territorial waters of Papua New Guinea, where it is aiming to produce copper, gold and silver. The Company has also been granted its environmental permit for this site. Nautilus also holds highly prospective exploration acreage in the western Pacific (granted and under application), as well as in international waters in the Central Pacific. A Canadian registered company, Nautilus is listed on the TSX:NUS stock exchange and trades on the OTCQX:NUSMF, and is also a member of the Nasdaq International Designation program. Its corporate office is in Brisbane, Australia. Its major shareholders include MB Holding Company LLC, an Oman based group with interests in mining, oil & gas, which holds a 27% interest and Metalloinvest, the largest iron ore producer in Europe and the CIS, which has a 15% holding (each on a non-diluted basis, excluding loan shares outstanding under the Company's share loan plan).






Investor Relations
Nautilus Minerals Inc. (Toronto)
[email protected]
1 (416) 551 1100
www.nautilusminerals.com
Principal American Liaison
Euro Pacific Capital, Inc.
88 Post Road West, 2nd Floor
Westport, CT 06880
1-203-662-9700 - Attn: Thomas Tan
[email protected]




Read more...
Nautilus Upgrades and Increases CCZ Mineral Resource to over 685 Million Tonnes

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - May 26, 2016) - Nautilus Minerals Inc. (TSX:NUS)(OTCQX:NUSMF)(OTC:NUSMF Nasdaq Intl Designation) (the "Company" or "Nautilus") announces its wholly owned subsidiary, Tonga Offshore Mining Limited ("TOML"), has upgraded its Mineral Resource estimate for its polymetallic nodule project to include portions in the Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories. This follows on from the successful completion of exploration campaigns in the Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone ("CCZ") in the Central Pacific in 2013 and late 2015.
Nautilus' CEO Mike Johnston commented, "It is exciting to announce this increase in the CCZ project's inferred mineral resource base from 410 Mt (wet) to 685 Mt (wet) as well the upgrade of an additional 68 Mt (wet) into the indicated category and 2.6 Mt into the measured category".
The Mineral Resource includes portions in the Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories and has been reported in the table below. The Mineral Resource estimate at an abundance cut-off of 6 wet kg/m2 is the selected base case scenario considering a non-selective bulk mining operation. Mr Mathew Nimmo, independent Qualified Person ("QP") for the project, has assessed the available information regarding mining and processing of the polymetallic nodules and concluded that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The effective date for the estimate is 30 March 2016 (being the date when the QP received the nodule sample data from TOML).
Mineral Resource Estimate for TOML Areas A-F within the Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone


Mineral Resource Classification
Abundance

(wet kg/m2)
Mn

(%)
Ni

(%)
Cu

(%)
Co

(%)
Polymetallic Nodules

(x106 wet t)*


Measured
11.81
27.57
1.33
1.05
0.23
2.6


Indicated
12.19
30.32
1.35
1.18
0.21
68.1


Inferred
11.52
29.05
1.29
1.14
0.20
685.3



NOTE: *Abundance cut-off of 6 wet kg/m2 used. As the nodules effectively form a single layer on the seafloor, "abundance" (kg/m2) is used to define the mineral resource tonnage. Variations in totals are due to rounding of individual values Mn, Ni, Cu and Co assays on samples dried at 105° C. Moisture content of nodules is estimated at 29% (free water removed after drying at 105°C). Changes to the Mineral Resource with changes in abundance cut-off are shown below. http://media3.marketwire.com/docs/1056509.jpg Nautilus CEO Mike Johnston also noted, "Our updated mineral resource for the CCZ highlights again the significant potential of seafloor resources. Technological advances in mining, oil & gas and maritime technologies over the last 20 years now mean there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction of these massive mineralized systems. At Nautilus, we are both excited and privileged to be leading the development of this significant, currently untapped potential, first with our high grade Solwara 1 Seafloor Massive Sulphide ("SMS") Project, and other SMS systems in the South West Pacific, and now with this updated polymetallic nodule mineral resource in the CCZ."
Mr. Matthew Nimmo, as independent QP, has prepared the technical information that forms the basis for this press release. He has completed this work on behalf of TOML and his work has been independently reviewed by AMC Consultants Pty Ltd. The results set out in this press release will be reported in detail in a Technical Report prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101"), and submitted on SEDAR within the next 45 days. Link to map: http://www.nautilusminerals.com//irm/showmedia.aspx?MediaId=53 Basis of the Mineral Resource Estimate: The QP for Mineral Resource estimates is Mr Matthew Nimmo. Mr Nimmo is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists, an independent Consulting Geologist, and fulfils the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of NI 43-101. A summary of technical items of interest includes: Tenure

All resources are held by TOML, a wholly 100% owned subsidiary of Nautilus. TOML is registered in the Kingdom of Tonga and is subject to all applicable Tongan mining and civil laws and Tongan taxes and royalties.
The resource falls within the six areas within the Exploration Area granted to TOML, which covers the exploration for polymetallic nodules and formalises the rights of TOML to apply for a "contract for exploitation".

Exploration

Historic samples were collected by "pioneer contractors" prior to TOML acquiring the property, (Japanese, French, and Russian research organisations), and provided to TOML and the QP by the International Seabed Authority.
Box-core and photo-profile data were collected by TOML during its 2015 cruise.
Box-core sampling: nodules were separated from the mud, washed and weighed using a motion compensating scale. The nodules were then laid out on a grid and photographed and then air dried for 30 to 90 minutes. Reference and duplicate samples were selected and all samples placed into plastic bags and then put into drums. The drums were sealed with tamper-proof tape.
The sample chain of custody and sample security was maintained. There was no evidence of tampering of the samples.
Nodule abundance was determined from box-core using the weight of the nodules divided by the area of the box-core used. Additional nodule abundance observations were derived from 1 in every 100th photo from the photo-profile lines using the manual long-axis estimation method. The long-axis estimation method involves measuring every nodule long-axis within the photo and then using this in the equation derived from Felix, D. 1980 "Some problems in making nodule abundance estimates from sea floor photographs" Marine Mining, Volume 2, Number 3. The parameters in the equation were calibrated from box-core abundance and the sea-floor photos at the same location as the box-core.

Assaying

Assays were performed at ALS laboratory (Brisbane), and Jacobs University in Bremen, Germany.
Additional duplicate samples were selected at the ALS laboratory by TOML during sub-sampling prior to submission to ALS.
ALS used their chromite/manganese ore fused disk XRF method to analyse elements including Mn, Ni, Cu and Co. They also used high grade four acid ICP-AES for selected samples.
Jacobs used 0.5M HNO3 ICP-MS and 0.5M HNO3 ICP-MS to analyse selected samples.

Quality control

There is no duplicate or QAQC laboratory data available for the historic sample results.
There were six groups that sampled the CCZ deposit over various parts using different sampling and assaying methods. Comparison of the data between each of the groups shows that the different sampling achieved similar results over vast areas.
TOML sub-sampled the box-core samples and collected a random set of 25 duplicate samples for assay by ALS. Comparison of the box-core duplicate sub-samples show no issues with sub-sampling or assaying.
TOML also submitted 15 duplicate samples to Jacobs laboratory. Comparison between Jacobs and ALS show good agreement for Ni and Co while the Jacobs analyses for Mn show a slight bias low and a slight bias high for Cu.
Both ALS and Jacobs also analysed internal standards (certified reference material), blanks and duplicates. All analyzed results were within acceptable limits.

Resource Estimation

Polymetallic nodules occur on the surface of the seafloor at varying abundance across the CCZ.
Grades were estimated from sample assays using ordinary block kriging.
Based on the sampling process it was conservatively assumed that the weights in the abundance measurements reported/collected by pioneer contractors were wet but there was some uncertainty as it was not clearly specified by each of the pioneer contractors who collected the data or the ISA who supplied it.
Based on the reported sample analysis processes, the metal grades were reported on a dry weight basis.
Estimate of tonnage was based on area and nodule abundance (wet kg/m2). Area was used as there was no effective sampling below the immediate seafloor and mining is only expected to recover nodules from the top 10 cm.
Abundance was estimated using free fall grab ("FFG") and box core samples, supplemented by estimates derived from photo profiling. Calculation of abundance from photo profiling using nodule long axis follows a previously published procedure, confirmed by laboratory measurements by TOML.
Estimate of Inferred Mineral Resource abundance is likely to be biased low as most of the historic samples including FFG samples, were within the Inferred Mineral Resource area. FFG samples typically underestimate the abundance of nodules. Correction factors to adjust the likely nodule abundance bias have not been applied.
Quantitative kriging neighbourhood analysis was performed to check selected estimation parameters.

Mineral Resource Uncertainty

The highest uncertainty is in estimating nodule abundance due to the nature of the spatial distribution of nodules. However, the photo profile lines demonstrate the continuity in nodule abundance between sample locations and confirm the range of spatial continuity (autocorrelation). The variogram range determined from photo profile percent nodule coverage is consistent with the range determined from the wider spaced samples used in estimating the Mineral Resource. Multibeam backscatter survey results cover the entire area in 30 - 60 m resolution and were used to aid in domaining areas with nodules from areas with very low or no nodules.
Classification of the Mineral Resource into Measured, Indicated and Inferred categories, in accordance with Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") definitions, considered: the nodule sample quality, uncertainty in the nodule sample abundance and grades, continuity of nodule abundance and grade and scale of the deposit.
Inferred Mineral Resource classification was based on sampling by pioneer contractors on a nominal spacing of 20 km, the variation and uncertainty in the sample quality, and the likely presence of short range variation to nodule abundance.
Indicated Mineral Resource classification was based on box core sampling by TOML on a nominal spacing of approximately 7 km by 7 km (including photo profiling in some cases at 7 km by 3 km), supplemented by sampling by pioneer contractors.
Measured Mineral Resource classification was based on box core sampling by TOML on a nominal spacing of approximately 7 km by 7 km plus photo-profiling on a nominal spacing of 3.5 km by 3.0 km, supplemented by sampling by pioneer contractors.

Development

No development of deep sea resources has been attempted or demonstrated other than some historical trial mining.
In the considered opinion of the QP, the Mineral Resource estimate meets the requirement of reasonable prospects for economic extraction. Particular factors of note are:

Seabed and sea conditions in the TOML Exploration Area are not materially different from other parts of the CCZ
Nodules have been successfully extracted in trials in the past and technological advances are likely to make the next attempts much more efficient; currently there are twelve other parties considering development
While TOML and Nautilus have not published any economic assessment for mining seafloor nodules in the CCZ, others have and they consider cut-off values in line with those listed in Table 1.


This Mineral Resource estimate is based upon and accurately reflects data compiled or supervised by Mr Matthew Nimmo, an independent Consulting Geologist, who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Nimmo has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and the type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he has undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 edition of the 'Australasian Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves' and as a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.
For more information please refer to www.nautilusminerals.com. Neither the TSX nor the OTCQX accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release. Certain of the statements made in this news release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities law. Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information include, but are not limited to statements or information with respect to the potential commercial extraction of seafloor resources in the CCZ. We have made numerous assumptions about the material forward-looking statements and information contained herein. Please refer to the Company's most recently filed Annual Information Form in respect of material assumptions and risks relevant to forward looking information. With respect to the CCZ, the "Exploration, Development and Operating Risks" section of the AIF should be read with the particular attributes of the CCZ, versus the Company's Bismarck Sea prospects, in mind. These include the fact that the ocean floor in the CCZ is at much greater depth, the fact that the CCZ is in the middle of the Pacific Ocean and the fact that the Company's plans for developing the CCZ are at a much earlier stage than its plans in respect of its Solwara 1 project. Even though our management believes the assumptions made and the expectations represented by such statements or information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statement or information will prove to be accurate. Forward-looking statements and information by their nature involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, among others as described in the most recently filed Annual Information Form, the risk that the amount of metals contained in the Company's deposits may differ from estimates of resources, the risk that any permits required for development of the CCZ will not be available to the Company, risks associated with financing and executing the required work programs and associated studies, other risks associated with metallurgical properties of the resource, environmental studies, people retention, technology development, intellectual property, logistical support in the CCZ, political interference (from both within and outside the International Seabed Authority), excessive and/or unwarranted non-government organisation attention and/or misinformation campaigns, and risks associated with maintaining the Company's TOML sponsorship. Should one or more of these risks, uncertainties or other factors materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in forward-looking statements and information. Although we have attempted to identify factors that would cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements and information, there may be other factors that cause actual results, performances, achievements or events to not be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Also, many of the factors are beyond our control. Accordingly you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. Except as required by law, we do not expect to update forward-looking statements and information as conditions change and you are referred to the full discussion of the Company's business contained in the Company's reports filed with the securities regulatory authorities in Canada.
About Nautilus Minerals Inc. Nautilus is the first company to explore the ocean floor for polymetallic seafloor massive sulphide deposits. Nautilus was granted the first mining lease for such deposits at the prospect known as Solwara 1, in the territorial waters of Papua New Guinea, where it is aiming to produce copper, gold and silver. The Company has also been granted its environmental permit for this site. Nautilus also holds highly prospective exploration acreage in the western Pacific (granted and under application), as well as in international waters in the Central Pacific. A Canadian registered company, Nautilus is listed on the (TSX:NUS) stock exchange and trades on the (OTCQX:NUSMF), and is also a member of the Nasdaq International Designation program. Its corporate office is in Brisbane, Australia. Its major shareholders include MB Holding Company LLC, an Oman based group with interests in mining, oil & gas, which holds a 27% interest and Metalloinvest, the largest iron ore producer in Europe and the CIS, which has a 15% holding (each on a non-diluted basis, excluding loan shares outstanding under the Company's share loan plan).





Investor Relations
Nautilus Minerals Inc. (Toronto)
[email protected]
1 (416) 551 1100
Principal American Liaison
Euro Pacific Capital, Inc.
88 Post Road West, 2nd Floor
Westport, CT 06880
1-203-662-9700 - Attn: Thomas Tan
[email protected]




Read more...
Nautilus Minerals Announces Financial Results for Q1 2016

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - May 16, 2016) - Nautilus Minerals Inc. (TSX:NUS)(OTCQX:NUSMF)(OTC PINK:NUSMF) (the "Company" or "Nautilus") announces the release of its unaudited consolidated Financial Statements for the first quarter ended March 31, 2016, together with Management's Discussion and Analysis. 2016 Significant Events to date

Factory Acceptance Testing ("FAT") completed by Soil Machine Dynamics on the Seafloor Production Tools ("SPTs")
Awarded contract for equipment storage and wet testing of the SPTs
SPTs arrived safely at Duqm Port in Oman
Completed assembly of the Subsea Slurry and Lift Pump ("SSLP") and commenced FAT
Advanced construction of the Production Support Vessel ("PSV")
Completed rights offering
US$47.5 million in cash and cash equivalents as at March 31, 2016 (C$28 million from the closing of the rights offering received on April 8, 2016)

Mike Johnston, Nautilus' CEO, commented, "It is very pleasing to see the progress that has been made on our seafloor production equipment this past quarter; in particular, taking delivery of the three SPTs and sending them safely to Oman where it is intended that they undergo wet testing later this year, while also commencing FAT on the SSLP. In the coming months, we will remain focused on the build of the PSV and the delivery of the equipment to be integrated in it. The momentum continues to build as we work towards commencing seafloor operations at the Solwara 1 project site in Q1 2018." The Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis will be filed on www.sedar.com and will also be available on the Company's website http://www.nautilusminerals.com/IRM/ShowCategory.aspx?CategoryId=305&FilterStyle=B&archive=true&masterpage=311&year=2015&RID=400 For more information please refer to www.nautilusminerals.com/About. Nautilus Minerals Inc. Nautilus is the first company to explore the ocean floor for polymetallic seafloor massive sulphide deposits. Nautilus was granted the first mining lease for such deposits at the prospect known as Solwara 1, in the territorial waters of Papua New Guinea, where it is aiming to produce copper, gold and silver. The Company has also been granted its environmental permit for this site. Nautilus also holds highly prospective exploration acreage in the western Pacific (granted and under application), as well as in international waters in the Central Pacific. A Canadian registered company, Nautilus is listed on the TSX:NUS stock exchange and trades on the OTCQX:NUSMF, and is also a member of the Nasdaq International Designation program. Its corporate office is in Brisbane, Australia. Its major shareholders include MB Holding Company LLC, an Oman based group with interests in mining, oil & gas, which holds a 27% interest and Metalloinvest, the largest iron ore producer in Europe and the CIS, which has a 15% holding (each on a non-diluted basis, excluding loan shares outstanding under the Company's share loan plan). Neither the TSX nor the OTCQX accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release. Certain of the statements made in this news release may contain forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including statements with respect to the SPTs undergoing wet testing later in 2016 and the plan to commence seafloor operations in Q1 2018. We have made numerous assumptions about such statements, including assumptions relating to the funding, completion and operation of the Company's seafloor production system. Even though our management believes the assumptions made and the expectations represented by such statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that they will prove to be accurate. Forward-looking information by its nature involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Please refer to our most recently filed Annual Information Form in respect of material assumptions and risks related to the prospects of extracting minerals from the seafloor and other risks relating to the Company's business and plans for development of the Solwara 1 Project. The Company is assuming that the seafloor production system, including the SPTs, will operate according to the Nautilus specifications and that the seafloor operations will commence on schedule. Risks related to such arrangements include delay to the planned testing operations of the seafloor production equipment, including the SPTs, and a consequent delay to the commencement of seafloor operations. Risks related to advancing towards production include the risk that the Company will be unable to obtain at all or on acceptable terms the remaining financing necessary to fund completion of the build, testing and deployment of the Company's seafloor production system. As the Company has not completed an economic study in respect of the Solwara 1 Project, there can be no assurance that the Company's production plans will, if fully funded and implemented, successfully demonstrate that seafloor resource production is commercially viable. Except as required by law, we do not expect to update forward-looking statements and information as conditions change and you are referred to the full discussion of the Company's business contained in the Company's reports filed with the securities regulatory authorities in Canada.





Investor Relations
Nautilus Minerals Inc. (Toronto)
1 (416) 551 1100
[email protected]
www.nautilusminerals.com
Principal American Liaison
Euro Pacific Capital, Inc.
88 Post Road West, 2nd Floor
Westport, CT 06880
1-203-662-9700
Attn: Thomas Tan, [email protected]




Read more...
Nautilus Minerals AGM to Be Held June 1, 2016

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - May 3, 2016) - Nautilus Minerals Inc. (TSX:NUS)(OTCQX:NUSMF)(OTC:NUSMF Nasdaq Intl Designation) (the "Company" or "Nautilus") is to hold its Annual General Meeting (AGM) in Toronto, Ontario, on Wednesday, June 1, 2016. The Company has today sent to shareholders its Annual Report, which contains the audited financial statements and Management's Discussion & Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2015, together with the meeting materials, being the notice of meeting, information circular and form of proxy. The Annual Report and the meeting materials will be available on the Company's website at http://www.nautilusminerals.com/irm/content/shareholder-meetings.aspx?RID=385 and on the Company's profile page on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. The Annual General Meeting will be held at the TMX Broadcast Centre Gallery, at 130 King Street West, Toronto, at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on the above date. The matters to be considered at the AGM are set forth in the notice of meeting and information circular. Shareholders as at the record date of April 25, 2016 will be entitled to vote their shares at the AGM. For more information please refer to www.nautilusminerals.com. About Nautilus Minerals Inc. Nautilus is the first company to explore the ocean floor for polymetallic seafloor massive sulphide deposits. Nautilus was granted the first mining lease for such deposits at the prospect known as Solwara 1, in the territorial waters of Papua New Guinea, where it is aiming to produce copper, gold and silver. The Company has also been granted its environmental permit for this site. Nautilus also holds highly prospective exploration acreage in the western Pacific (granted and under application), as well as in international waters in the Central Pacific. A Canadian registered company, Nautilus is listed on the TSX:NUS stock exchange and trades on the OTCQX:NUSMF, and is also a member of the Nasdaq International Designation program. Its corporate office is in Brisbane, Australia. Its major shareholders include MB Holding Company LLC, an Oman based group with interests in mining, oil & gas, which holds a 27% interest and Metalloinvest, the largest iron ore producer in Europe and the CIS, which has a 15% holding (each on a non-diluted basis, excluding loan shares outstanding under the Company's share loan plan).





Investor Relations
Nautilus Minerals Inc. (Toronto)
[email protected]
1 (416) 551 1100
www.nautilusminerals.com
Principal American Liaison
Euro Pacific Capital, Inc.
88 Post Road West, 2nd Floor, Westport, CT 06880
1-203-662-9700
Attn: Thomas Tan
[email protected]




Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 21.83
NUS's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
55% of the 1258 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 20.28 vs. NUS: 21.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
NUS' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.81  Med: 18.31 Max: 41.63
Current: 21.83
8.81
41.63
Forward PE Ratio 17.21
NUS's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
61% of the 359 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 19.01 vs. NUS: 17.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 21.83
NUS's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
54% of the 1252 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 20.28 vs. NUS: 21.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
NUS' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.81  Med: 18.31 Max: 41.63
Current: 21.83
8.81
41.63
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 21.24
NUS's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
51% of the 693 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 20.79 vs. NUS: 21.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
NUS' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.92  Med: 18.8 Max: 1066.25
Current: 21.24
7.92
1066.25
PB Ratio 4.56
NUS's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
84% of the 1512 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.75 vs. NUS: 4.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
NUS' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.74  Med: 3.93 Max: 10.07
Current: 4.56
1.74
10.07
PS Ratio 1.43
NUS's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
60% of the 1516 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. NUS: 1.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
NUS' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 1.22 Max: 2.94
Current: 1.43
0.45
2.94
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 13.87
NUS's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
63% of the 600 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 18.92 vs. NUS: 13.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
NUS' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.17  Med: 15.09 Max: 43.39
Current: 13.87
6.17
43.39
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 11.35
NUS's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
54% of the 841 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 12.31 vs. NUS: 11.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
NUS' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.19  Med: 11.94 Max: 30.34
Current: 11.35
5.19
30.34
EV-to-EBIT 12.94
NUS's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
74% of the 1680 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 16.43 vs. NUS: 12.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
NUS' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.3  Med: 10.9 Max: 24.7
Current: 12.94
5.3
24.7
EV-to-EBITDA 9.86
NUS's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
74% of the 1719 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 12.42 vs. NUS: 9.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
NUS' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.8  Med: 8.8 Max: 16.1
Current: 9.86
4.8
16.1
PEG Ratio 10.38
NUS's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
89% of the 577 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 2.04 vs. NUS: 10.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
NUS' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 0.81 Max: 30.96
Current: 10.38
0.27
30.96
Shiller PE Ratio 20.82
NUS's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
69% of the 264 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 28.51 vs. NUS: 20.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
NUS' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.6  Med: 21.95 Max: 66.58
Current: 20.82
9.6
66.58
Current Ratio 1.79
NUS's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 1427 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.60 vs. NUS: 1.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
NUS' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.31  Med: 1.83 Max: 2.89
Current: 1.79
1.31
2.89
Quick Ratio 1.16
NUS's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 1427 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. NUS: 1.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
NUS' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.95  Med: 1.26 Max: 1.96
Current: 1.16
0.95
1.96
Days Inventory 190.17
NUS's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
90% of the 1460 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 63.56 vs. NUS: 190.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
NUS' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 128.15  Med: 169.89 Max: 258.69
Current: 190.17
128.15
258.69
Days Sales Outstanding 5.16
NUS's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
93% of the 1148 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 38.13 vs. NUS: 5.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
NUS' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.83  Med: 6.14 Max: 7.89
Current: 5.16
4.83
7.89
Days Payable 30.09
NUS's Days Payable is ranked lower than
67% of the 1023 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 45.59 vs. NUS: 30.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
NUS' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 21.5  Med: 35.28 Max: 59.67
Current: 30.09
21.5
59.67

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 2.57
NUS's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
66% of the 1628 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.81 vs. NUS: 2.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
NUS' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 2.26 Max: 5.05
Current: 2.57
0.86
5.05
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.56
NUS's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 986 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 0.36 vs. NUS: 0.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
NUS' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.38 Max: 0.63
Current: 0.56
0.2
0.63
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 5.80
NUS's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
54% of the 677 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. NUS: 5.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
NUS' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 6.9 Max: 33.9
Current: 5.8
0
33.9
Forward Dividend Yield % 2.61
NUS's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
63% of the 1557 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.93 vs. NUS: 2.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 6.24
NUS's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
91% of the 2022 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 2.27 vs. NUS: 6.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
NUS' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.09  Med: 5.48 Max: 12.25
Current: 6.24
2.09
12.25
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 2.60
NUS's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
93% of the 698 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: -1.90 vs. NUS: 2.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
NUS' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.9  Med: 2.2 Max: 5.9
Current: 2.6
-1.9
5.9

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 6.19
NUS's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
86% of the 1418 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.91 vs. NUS: 6.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
NUS' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.23  Med: 7.97 Max: 23.9
Current: 6.19
1.23
23.9
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.29
NUS's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
61% of the 659 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.57 vs. NUS: 1.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
NUS' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 1.11 Max: 2.53
Current: 1.29
0.66
2.53
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 0.77
NUS's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked higher than
84% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. NUS: 0.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.17
NUS's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
53% of the 1320 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. NUS: 1.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
NUS' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.43  Med: 0.95 Max: 2.66
Current: 1.17
0.43
2.66
Price-to-Graham-Number 2.45
NUS's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
77% of the 997 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 1.42 vs. NUS: 2.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
NUS' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 2.48 Max: 5.67
Current: 2.45
0.63
5.67
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 7.74
NUS's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
77% of the 1947 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 5.41 vs. NUS: 7.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
NUS' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4  Med: 9.15 Max: 18.9
Current: 7.74
4
18.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 4.50
NUS's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
54% of the 771 Companies
in the Global Household & Personal Products industry.

( Industry Median: 5.68 vs. NUS: 4.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
NUS' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.4  Med: 19.9 Max: 37.8
Current: 4.5
3.4
37.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $2,208
EPS (TTM) $ 2.53
Beta0.50
Short Percentage of Float17.63%
52-Week Range $37.09 - 66.04
Shares Outstanding (Mil)52.82

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 2,271 2,370
EPS ($) 3.21 3.61
EPS without NRI ($) 3.21 3.61
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 1.49
» More Articles for NUS

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Nu Skin Enterprises To Report First-Quarter 2017 Results Apr 10 2017 
Is Nu Skin's 11% Earnings Drop an Overreaction? Feb 23 2017 
All-In-One Screener Finds Companies With High, Growing Yields Jan 26 2017 
Examine Cognizant's Recent Developments Closely Oct 06 2016 
This World-Class Beauty Products Maker Rallies Forward Aug 22 2016 
Nautilus Releases a NI 43-101 Technical Report for Polymetallic Nodules Jul 04 2016 
Nautilus Minerals Provides Update Jun 29 2016 
High Yield, Strong Returns: Sturm Ruger, Nu Skin Enterprises Jun 23 2016 
High Yield and Profitability: Sturm Ruger, Infosys Jun 15 2016 
Nautilus Minerals AGM Voting Results Jun 01 2016 

More From Other Websites
Can Nu Skin (NUS) Spring a Surprise This Earnings Season? Apr 27 2017
Top 4 Cosmetics Stocks of 2017 Apr 13 2017
Nu Skin Enterprises To Report First-Quarter 2017 Results Apr 10 2017
Visa Issues Keep Thousands of Chinese Tourists From Hawaii Apr 01 2017
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : NUS-US : March... Mar 16 2017
Take a Fresh Look at Nu Skin Enterprises Mar 09 2017
Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) Appoints New Managerial Positions Mar 08 2017
Nu Skin Enterprises Appoints Mark Lawrence as Chief Financial Officer Mar 07 2017
Nu Skin Enterprises To Present At UBS Global Consumer And Retail Conference Mar 03 2017
Unusual Activity: GLD & NUS Feb 24 2017
Incyte, CBOE Holdings, Regency Centers Set to Join S&P 500; Others to Join S&P MidCap 400 Feb 23 2017
Is Nu Skin's 11% Earnings Drop an Overreaction? Feb 23 2017
Not a Pretty Picture: Avon, Nu Skin Struggle with Revenue Feb 22 2017
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : NUS-US : February... Feb 20 2017
Why Yamana Gold, Nu Skin Enterprises, and DineEquity Slumped Today Feb 17 2017
Why Nu Skin Enterprises Stock Dropped Today Feb 17 2017
Why Nu Skin Has Tumbled 13% Feb 17 2017
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. :NUS-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : February 17, 2017 Feb 17 2017
Nu Skin's Q4 Felt Like Deja Vu As December Sales Trends Disappoint Feb 17 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)