Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 34.10
NYSE:OME's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
74% of the 1576 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. NYSE:OME: 34.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:OME' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.91 Max: 34.1
Current: 34.1
0.03
34.1
Equity-to-Asset 0.78
NYSE:OME's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
84% of the 1540 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. NYSE:OME: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:OME' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 0.73 Max: 0.85
Current: 0.78
0.5
0.85
Interest Coverage 129.50
NYSE:OME's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
70% of the 1370 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 19.63 vs. NYSE:OME: 129.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:OME' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.02  Med: 23.73 Max: 129.5
Current: 129.5
5.02
129.5
Piotroski F-Score: 8
Altman Z-Score: 5.16
Beneish M-Score: -3.14
WACC vs ROIC
-1.00%
11.05%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 13.72
NYSE:OME's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
79% of the 1561 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.68 vs. NYSE:OME: 13.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:OME' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.6  Med: 13.5 Max: 21.59
Current: 13.72
-2.6
21.59
Net Margin % 8.42
NYSE:OME's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
72% of the 1565 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.98 vs. NYSE:OME: 8.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:OME' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.76  Med: 7.41 Max: 13.57
Current: 8.42
-3.76
13.57
ROE % 10.40
NYSE:OME's ROE % is ranked higher than
59% of the 1523 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 8.16 vs. NYSE:OME: 10.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:OME' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.48  Med: 10.09 Max: 19.29
Current: 10.4
-4.48
19.29
ROA % 7.88
NYSE:OME's ROA % is ranked higher than
74% of the 1600 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.84 vs. NYSE:OME: 7.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:OME' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.88  Med: 6.02 Max: 13.27
Current: 7.88
-2.88
13.27
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 17.47
NYSE:OME's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
59% of the 1587 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.34 vs. NYSE:OME: 17.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:OME' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.68  Med: 14.47 Max: 29.69
Current: 17.47
-2.68
29.69
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 14.10
NYSE:OME's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
86% of the 1341 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.50 vs. NYSE:OME: 14.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:OME' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.3  Med: 9 Max: 29.5
Current: 14.1
-12.3
29.5
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 1.40
NYSE:OME's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
60% of the 1162 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. NYSE:OME: 1.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:OME' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -53  Med: 2.65 Max: 151.9
Current: 1.4
-53
151.9
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 0.20
NYSE:OME's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
59% of the 1041 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.40 vs. NYSE:OME: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:OME' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -47.4  Med: 5.85 Max: 80
Current: 0.2
-47.4
80
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with Omega Protein Corp $NYSE:OME.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:OME's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-08)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

OME Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jeremy Grantham 30,400 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 82,935 sh (+22.50%)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Richard Snow 367,498 sh (-3.75%)
Paul Tudor Jones 17,517 sh (-18.84%)
» More
Q2 2016

OME Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jeremy Grantham 228,500 sh (+651.64%)
Paul Tudor Jones 29,108 sh (+66.17%)
Richard Snow 353,893 sh (-3.70%)
Joel Greenblatt 67,101 sh (-19.09%)
» More
Q3 2016

OME Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 133,500 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 28,071 sh (-3.56%)
Richard Snow 246,884 sh (-30.24%)
Jeremy Grantham 133,547 sh (-41.55%)
Joel Greenblatt 38,687 sh (-42.35%)
» More
Q4 2016

OME Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 247,900 sh (+85.69%)
Paul Tudor Jones 42,983 sh (+53.12%)
Joel Greenblatt 40,305 sh (+4.18%)
Richard Snow 182,697 sh (-26.00%)
Jeremy Grantham 36,970 sh (-72.32%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with OME

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Consumer Packaged Goods » Packaged Foods    NAICS: 311119    SIC: 2077
Compare:OTCPK:HLNFF, OTCPK:PFODF, OTCPK:CSEAF, NAS:FRPT, NAS:SENEA, NAS:SYUT, OTCPK:PDMXY, OTCPK:DCSA, NAS:NUTR, OTCPK:SFOOF, NAS:FARM, NYSE:BETR, OTCPK:PCRTF, NAS:STKL, NAS:DTEA, NAS:LWAY, OTCPK:RTHVF, NYSE:ANFI, NAS:GLDC, OTCPK:CAOBF » details
Traded in other countries:OPE.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Omega Protein Corp is a nutritional ingredient company. It develops, produces and delivers healthy products throughout the world to improve nutritional integrity of foods, dietary supplements and animal feeds.

Omega Protein Corp was incorporated in Nevada on January 23, 1998. The Company is a nutritional ingredient company and the nation's vertically integrated producer of Omega-3 fish oil and specialty fish meal products. The Company operates in two primary industry segments: animal nutrition and human nutrition. The animal nutrition segment is comprised of two subsidiaries: Omega Protein, Inc. and Omega Shipyard, Inc. Omega Protein, Inc. ("Omega Protein"), the Company's principal operating subsidiary, is predominantly dedicated to the production of animal nutrition products and operates in the menhaden harvesting and processing business. Omega Protein operated four menhaden processing plants: two in Louisiana, one in Mississippi and one in Virginia. The Company also operates a Health and Science Center in Reedville, Virginia, which provides a 100-metric tons per day fish oil input capacity for the Company's food, industrial and feed grade oils. A portion of Omega Protein's production is transferred to its human nutrition segment where it is further processed and sold. Omega Shipyard, Inc. ("Omega Shipyard") owns and operates a drydock facility in Moss Point, Mississippi that is used to provide shoreside maintenance for Omega Protein's fishing fleet and, subject to outside demand and excess capacity, occasionally for third-party vessels. The human nutrition segment, which operates under the name Nutegrity, is comprised of three subsidiaries: Cyvex Nutrition, Inc. ("Cyvex"), InCon Processing, L.L.C. ("InCon") and Wisconsin Specialty Protein, L.L.C. ("WSP"). Cyvex, is an ingredient provider in the nutraceutical industry. InCon, is a specialty processor that utilizes molecular distillation technology to concentrate Omega-3 fish oils and, subject to outside demand and excess capacity, a variety of other compound products for third-party tolling customers. WSP, is a manufacturer and marketer of specialty dairy and other protein products. Nutegrity, the Company's human nutrition business, has three primary product lines: protein products, Omega-3 fish oil ingredients and other nutraceutical ingredients. The Company also operates a technical center in Houston, Texas, the Omega Protein Technology and Innovation Center, which has food science application labs as well as analytical, sensory, lipids research and pilot plant capabilities. The Company's operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations.

Top Ranked Articles about Omega Protein Corp

APPROACHING DEADLINE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein Corporation and Reminds Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm
OME LOSS ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Reminds Omega Protein Corporation Investors of Important Deadline in Class Action Filed by Firm – OME
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action against Omega Protein Corporation and Certain Officers – OME
IMPORTANT INVESTOR ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein Corporation and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brower Piven Encourages Investors Who Have Losses In Excess Of $100,000 From Investment In Omega Protein Corporation (OME) To Contact Brower Piven Before The Lead Plaintiff Deadline In Class Action Lawsuit
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein Corporation and Encourages Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm
EQUITY ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Announces Filing of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against Omega Protein Corporation – OME

NEW YORK, March 22, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Omega Protein Corporation securities (:OME) from August 3, 2016 through March 1, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Omega investors under the federal securities laws. To join the Omega class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1069.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for information on the class action. NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the SEC is requesting information in connection with an investigation relating to Omega’s subsidiary’s compliance with its probation terms and Omega’s protection of whistleblower employees; (2) it is possible that the foregoing matter could result in a material adverse effect on Omega’s business, reputation, results of operation and financial condition; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ statements about Omega’s business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 1, 2017. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1069.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim or Kevin Chan of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at [email protected] or [email protected]. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm. Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation.
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
Kevin Chan, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY  10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

Read more...
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in Omega Protein Corporation of Class Action Lawsuit and Upcoming Deadline – OME
NEW YORK, March 21, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Omega Protein Corporation (“Omega” or the “Company”) (:OME) and certain of its officers.   The class action, filed in United States District Court, Central District of California, is on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Omega securities, seeking to recover compensable damages caused by defendants’ violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.If you are a shareholder who purchased Omega securities between August 3, 2016 and March 1, 2017, both dates inclusive, you have until May 1, 2017 to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class.  A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at www.pomerantzlaw.com.   To discuss this action, contact Robert S. Willoughby at [email protected] or 888.476.6529 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll free, ext. 9980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and number of shares purchased. [Click here to join this class action]Omega develops, produces, and delivers products to enhance the nutritional integrity of foods, dietary supplements, and animal feeds worldwide.The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects.  Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the SEC is requesting information in connection with an investigation relating to Omega’s subsidiary’s compliance with its probation terms and Omega’s protection of whistleblower employees; (2) it is possible that the foregoing matter could result in a material adverse effect on Omega’s business, reputation, results of operation and financial condition; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ statements about Omega’s business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable bases at all relevant times.On March 1, 2017, during aftermarket hours, Omega filed a Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 with the SEC, revealing that in December 2016, it “received a subpoena from the SEC requesting information in connection with an investigation relating to a Company subsidiary’s compliance with its probation terms and the Company’s protection of whistleblower employees.” Omega further revealed that “it is possible that the foregoing matter could result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, reputation, results of operation and financial condition.”On this news, shares of Omega fell $6.25 per share or over 23.81% from its previous closing price to close at $20.00 per share on March 2, 2017, damaging investors.The Pomerantz Firm, with offices in New York, Chicago, Florida, and Los Angeles, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 80 years later, the Pomerantz Firm continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomerantzlaw.com
CONTACT:
Robert S. Willoughby
Pomerantz LLP
[email protected]

Read more...
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Excess Of $100,000 Investing In Omega Protein Corp. To Contact The Firm Before Lead Plaintiff Deadline

NEW YORK, March 20, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, reminds investors in Omega Protein Corp. (“Omega” or the “Company”) (:OME) of the May 1, 2017 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action lawsuit filed against the Company and certain officers. The lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of all those who purchased Omega stock or options between June 4, 2013 and March 1, 2017 (the “Class Period”).  The case, Malone v. Omega Protein Corporation et al, No. 17-cv-01596 was filed on March 2, 2017, and has been assigned to Judge P. Kevin Castel. The lawsuit focuses on whether the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by engaging in conduct that would potentially lead to an investigation into its whistleblower policy by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Specifically, on March 1, 2017, the Company acknowledged that the SEC issued a subpoena in December 2016 requesting information in connection with an investigation relating to the Company subsidiary’s compliance with its probation terms and the Company’s protection of whistleblower employees. After the announcement, Omega’s share price fell from $26.25 per share on March 1, 2017 to a closing price of $20.00 on March 2, 2017—a $6.25 or a 23.8% drop. Request more information now by clicking here: www.faruqilaw.com/OME. There is no cost or obligation to you. Take Action If you invested in Omega stock or options between June 4, 2013 and March 1, 2017 and would like to discuss your legal rights, visit www.faruqilaw.com/OME. You can also contact us by calling Richard Gonnello toll free at 877-247-4292 or at 212-983-9330 or by sending an e-mail to [email protected].  Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding Omega’s conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class that is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision of whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. 

Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP (www.faruqilaw.com). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner.
FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP
685 Third Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Attn: Richard Gonnello, Esq.
[email protected]
Telephone: (877) 247-4292 or (212) 983-9330

Read more...
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brower Piven Notifies Investors of Class Action Lawsuit And Encourages Those Who Have Losses In Excess Of $100,000 From Investment In Omega Protein Corporation (OME) To Contact Brower Piven Before The Lead Plaintiff Deadline

STEVENSON, Md., March 15, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The securities litigation law firm of Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation, announces that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of Omega Protein Corporation (:OME) (“Omega” or the “Company”) securities during the period between June 4, 2013 and March 1, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”).  Investors who wish to become proactively involved in the litigation have until May 1, 2017 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff.
If you wish to choose counsel to represent you and the class, you must apply to be appointed lead plaintiff and be selected by the Court.  The lead plaintiff will direct the litigation and participate in important decisions including whether to accept a settlement for the class in the action.  The lead plaintiff will be selected from among applicants claiming the largest loss from investment in Omega securities during the Class Period.  Members of the class will be represented by the lead plaintiff and counsel chosen by the lead plaintiff.  No class has yet been certified in the above action. The complaint accuses the defendants of violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by virtue of the defendants’ failure to disclose during the Class Period that Omega’s subsidiary was potentially not in compliance with its probation terms, that the Company was not properly protecting whistleblower employees, and the Company was vulnerable to a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) investigation and potential civil and criminal liability. According to the complaint, following a March 1, 2017 announcement that in December 2016 the Company received a subpoena from the SEC requesting information in connection with an investigation relating to the Company’s subsidiary’s compliance with its probation terms and the Company’s protection of whistleblower employees, the value of Omega shares declined significantly. If you have suffered a loss in excess of $100,000 from investment in Omega securities purchased on or after June 4, 2013 and held through the revelation of negative information during and/or at the end of the Class Period and would like to learn more about this lawsuit and your ability to participate as a lead plaintiff, without cost or obligation to you, please visit our website at http://www.browerpiven.com/currentsecuritiescases.html.  You may also request more information by contacting Brower Piven either by email at [email protected] or by telephone at (410) 415-6616.  Brower Piven also encourages anyone with information regarding the Company’s conduct during the period in question to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. Attorneys at Brower Piven have extensive experience in litigating securities and other class action cases and have been advocating for the rights of shareholders since the 1980s.  If you choose to retain counsel, you may retain Brower Piven without financial obligation or cost to you, or you may retain other counsel of your choice.  You need take no action at this time to be a member of the class.
CONTACT:  Charles J. Piven
Brower Piven, A Professional Corporation
1925 Old Valley Road
Stevenson, Maryland 21153
Telephone: 410-415-6616
[email protected]

Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 13.89
OME's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
70% of the 1258 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 20.28 vs. OME: 13.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
OME' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.91  Med: 14.16 Max: 168.67
Current: 13.89
2.91
168.67
Forward PE Ratio 12.00
OME's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
90% of the 359 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 19.01 vs. OME: 12.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 13.89
OME's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
70% of the 1252 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 20.28 vs. OME: 13.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
OME' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.91  Med: 14.16 Max: 168.67
Current: 13.89
2.91
168.67
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 10.28
OME's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
79% of the 693 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 20.79 vs. OME: 10.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
OME' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.94  Med: 13.24 Max: 821.88
Current: 10.28
2.94
821.88
PB Ratio 1.34
OME's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 1512 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.75 vs. OME: 1.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
OME' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 1.03 Max: 2.24
Current: 1.34
0.26
2.24
PS Ratio 1.14
OME's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
52% of the 1516 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. OME: 1.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
OME' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.93 Max: 1.74
Current: 1.14
0.21
1.74
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 7.82
OME's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
81% of the 600 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 18.92 vs. OME: 7.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
OME' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.87  Med: 12.12 Max: 522.81
Current: 7.82
2.87
522.81
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 4.77
OME's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
85% of the 841 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 12.31 vs. OME: 4.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
OME' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 5.86 Max: 360.83
Current: 4.77
2.1
360.83
EV-to-EBIT 8.41
OME's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
86% of the 1680 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 16.43 vs. OME: 8.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
OME' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -28.7  Med: 8.8 Max: 226.4
Current: 8.41
-28.7
226.4
EV-to-EBITDA 5.62
OME's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
90% of the 1719 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 12.42 vs. OME: 5.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
OME' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.5  Med: 5.7 Max: 29.6
Current: 5.62
1.5
29.6
PEG Ratio 2.77
OME's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 577 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.04 vs. OME: 2.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
OME' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.06  Med: 0.66 Max: 52.41
Current: 2.77
0.06
52.41
Shiller PE Ratio 21.74
OME's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 264 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 28.51 vs. OME: 21.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
OME' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.6  Med: 23.6 Max: 139.42
Current: 21.74
12.6
139.42
Current Ratio 3.44
OME's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
83% of the 1427 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.60 vs. OME: 3.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
OME' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.4  Med: 4.45 Max: 6.72
Current: 3.44
2.4
6.72
Quick Ratio 1.50
OME's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 1427 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. OME: 1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
OME' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.82 Max: 3.75
Current: 1.5
0.76
3.75
Days Inventory 146.91
OME's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
84% of the 1460 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 63.56 vs. OME: 146.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
OME' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 124.02  Med: 156.88 Max: 202.87
Current: 146.91
124.02
202.87
Days Sales Outstanding 30.01
OME's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
62% of the 1148 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 38.13 vs. OME: 30.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
OME' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17.32  Med: 28.97 Max: 68.83
Current: 30.01
17.32
68.83
Days Payable 22.54
OME's Days Payable is ranked lower than
76% of the 1023 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 45.59 vs. OME: 22.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
OME' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.57  Med: 7.73 Max: 33.88
Current: 22.54
5.57
33.88

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 0.25
OME's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
98% of the 1628 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.81 vs. OME: 0.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
OME' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 0.27
Current: 0.25
0
0.27
Forward Dividend Yield % 0.98
OME's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
80% of the 1557 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.93 vs. OME: 0.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.25
OME's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
96% of the 2022 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.27 vs. OME: 0.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
OME' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 0.27
Current: 0.25
0
0.27
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -2.50
OME's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 698 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: -1.90 vs. OME: -2.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
OME' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.9  Med: -1.35 Max: 13.2
Current: -2.5
-4.9
13.2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 4.59
OME's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked higher than
61% of the 659 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 6.36 vs. OME: 4.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
OME' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.6  Med: 3.48 Max: 8.85
Current: 4.59
1.6
8.85
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.54
OME's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
58% of the 1418 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.91 vs. OME: 1.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
OME' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 1.04 Max: 2.08
Current: 1.54
0.29
2.08
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.83
OME's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
80% of the 659 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.57 vs. OME: 0.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
OME' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 1.12 Max: 5.77
Current: 0.83
0.47
5.77
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 1.30
OME's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked higher than
56% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. OME: 1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.23
OME's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
55% of the 1320 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. OME: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
OME' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.93 Max: 2.05
Current: 1.23
0.45
2.05
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 1.34
OME's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked higher than
59% of the 290 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.64 vs. OME: 1.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
OME' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 0.5 Max: 8.27
Current: 1.34
0.24
8.27
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.98
OME's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
70% of the 997 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.42 vs. OME: 0.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
OME' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 0.79 Max: 2.15
Current: 0.98
0.38
2.15
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 11.91
OME's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
88% of the 1947 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.41 vs. OME: 11.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
OME' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 10.85 Max: 52.6
Current: 11.91
0.4
52.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 14.44
OME's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
71% of the 771 Companies
in the Global Packaged Foods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.68 vs. OME: 14.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
OME' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -28.2  Med: 16.7 Max: 40
Current: 14.44
-28.2
40

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $390.8
EPS (TTM) $ 1.45
Beta-0.55
Short Percentage of Float2.18%
52-Week Range $18.00 - 26.99
Shares Outstanding (Mil)22.42

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 370 380
EPS ($) 1.70 1.91
EPS without NRI ($) 1.70 1.91
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for OME

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
5-DAY DEADLINE: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein Co Apr 26 2017 
ONE WEEK DEADLINE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein Cor Apr 24 2017 
Omega Protein Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Release and Conference Call Dates Apr 24 2017 
APPROACHING DEADLINE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein Apr 21 2017 
EQUITY ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Announces Filing of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against Omega Prote Apr 20 2017 
Omega Protein Corporation Board of Directors Nominates Dr. Celeste Clark to Board Apr 19 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Excess Of $100,0 Apr 17 2017 
OMEGA PROTEIN INVESTIGATION INITIATED BY FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Apr 14 2017 
OME LOSS ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Reminds Omega Protein Corporation Investors of Important Deadline in Apr 06 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Announces the Filing of a Class Action against Omega Protein Apr 05 2017 

More From Other Websites
DEADLINE ALERT - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Omega... Apr 28 2017
DEADLINE ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein... Apr 27 2017
OME Investors: GPM Reminds Investors of the May 2 Deadline in the Class Action Lawsuit Against Omega... Apr 27 2017
5-DAY DEADLINE: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein... Apr 26 2017
DEADLINE ALERT: Brower Piven Reminds Investors of the Upcoming Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit and... Apr 26 2017
ONE WEEK DEADLINE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein... Apr 24 2017
Omega Protein Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Release and Conference Call Dates Apr 24 2017
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses in Excess of... Apr 23 2017
IMPORTANT SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against... Apr 21 2017
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in Omega... Apr 21 2017
APPROACHING DEADLINE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein... Apr 21 2017
May 2 Deadline Alert: Law Offices of Howard G. Smith Reminds Omega Protein Corporation Investors of... Apr 21 2017
IMPORTANT INVESTOR ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega... Apr 20 2017
EQUITY ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Announces Filing of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against Omega... Apr 20 2017
SHAREHOLDER ALERT - Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against... Apr 20 2017
Omega Protein Corporation Board of Directors Nominates Dr. Celeste Clark to Board Apr 19 2017
SHAREHOLDER NOTICE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein... Apr 18 2017
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Excess Of... Apr 17 2017
EQUITY ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein... Apr 17 2017
OMEGA PROTEIN INVESTIGATION INITIATED BY FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC... Apr 14 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)