Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.01
OTCPK:GDPAN's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
93% of the 492 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. OTCPK:GDPAN: 0.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
OTCPK:GDPAN' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0  Med: 0.04 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.01
Equity to Asset 0.03
OTCPK:GDPAN's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
94% of the 469 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.54 vs. OTCPK:GDPAN: 0.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
OTCPK:GDPAN' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: -0.02  Med: 0.43 Max: 0.69
Current: 0.03
-0.02
0.69
F-Score: 2
Z-Score: -3.30
M-Score: -5.22
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -202.55
OTCPK:GDPAN's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
83% of the 482 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.49 vs. OTCPK:GDPAN: -202.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
OTCPK:GDPAN' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -307.65  Med: -6.57 Max: 67.31
Current: -202.55
-307.65
67.31
Net-margin (%) -194.58
OTCPK:GDPAN's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
83% of the 483 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -12.32 vs. OTCPK:GDPAN: -194.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
OTCPK:GDPAN' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -227.29  Med: -11.86 Max: 56.36
Current: -194.58
-227.29
56.36
ROE (%) -224.90
OTCPK:GDPAN's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
97% of the 527 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.18 vs. OTCPK:GDPAN: -224.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
OTCPK:GDPAN' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -224.72  Med: -22.22 Max: 31.57
Current: -224.9
-224.72
31.57
ROA (%) -39.61
OTCPK:GDPAN's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
85% of the 555 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -5.04 vs. OTCPK:GDPAN: -39.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
OTCPK:GDPAN' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -41.63  Med: -4.16 Max: 17.06
Current: -39.61
-41.63
17.06
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -38.67
OTCPK:GDPAN's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
75% of the 541 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -6.88 vs. OTCPK:GDPAN: -38.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
OTCPK:GDPAN' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -42.47  Med: -0.63 Max: 29.22
Current: -38.67
-42.47
29.22
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -5.50
OTCPK:GDPAN's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
69% of the 344 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.50 vs. OTCPK:GDPAN: -5.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
OTCPK:GDPAN' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -26.8  Med: 1.60 Max: 52.4
Current: -5.5
-26.8
52.4
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 101.70
OTCPK:GDPAN's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
94% of the 267 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. OTCPK:GDPAN: 101.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
OTCPK:GDPAN' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -46  Med: 40.80 Max: 126.8
Current: 101.7
-46
126.8
» OTCPK:GDPAN's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with OTCPK:GDPAN

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Preferred stocks of Goodrich Petroleum Corp

SymbolPriceYieldDescription
GDPAN4.3530.89
GDPAO0.000.00
GDPPRD3.5568.66
GDPPRC4.0861.27Pfd Shs Series -C-

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 200.00
GDPAN's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
92% of the 213 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 24.10 vs. GDPAN: 200.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 2.93
GDPAN's P/B is ranked lower than
89% of the 512 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.79 vs. GDPAN: 2.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
GDPAN' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.88  Med: 3.87 Max: 19.32
Current: 2.93
0.88
19.32
P/S 0.23
GDPAN's P/S is ranked higher than
93% of the 443 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.63 vs. GDPAN: 0.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
GDPAN' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.23  Med: 4.93 Max: 22.52
Current: 0.23
0.23
22.52
POCF 0.35
GDPAN's POCF is ranked higher than
96% of the 327 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.43 vs. GDPAN: 0.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
GDPAN' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 0.35  Med: 7.74 Max: 21.32
Current: 0.35
0.35
21.32
Current Ratio 0.56
GDPAN's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
78% of the 537 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. GDPAN: 0.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
GDPAN' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.09  Med: 0.80 Max: 2.89
Current: 0.56
0.09
2.89
Quick Ratio 0.55
GDPAN's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
77% of the 537 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. GDPAN: 0.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
GDPAN' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.09  Med: 0.78 Max: 2.89
Current: 0.55
0.09
2.89
Days Inventory 182.63
GDPAN's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
91% of the 220 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 24.94 vs. GDPAN: 182.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
GDPAN' s 10-Year Days Inventory Range
Min: 8.77  Med: 142.18 Max: 231.51
Current: 182.63
8.77
231.51
Days Sales Outstanding 18.34
GDPAN's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
86% of the 437 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 39.73 vs. GDPAN: 18.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
GDPAN' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 5.59  Med: 43.47 Max: 122.49
Current: 18.34
5.59
122.49

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 30.89
GDPAN's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
164% of the 377 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.05 vs. GDPAN: 30.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
GDPAN' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 31.69
Current: 30.89
0
31.69
Yield on cost (5-Year) 29.53
GDPAN's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
99% of the 383 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.74 vs. GDPAN: 29.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
GDPAN' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 31.69
Current: 29.53
0
31.69
Share Buyback Rate -7.10
GDPAN's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
51% of the 402 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.40 vs. GDPAN: -7.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
GDPAN' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 3.7  Med: -9.80 Max: -50.2
Current: -7.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -60.34
GDPAN's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
84% of the 189 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -6.36 vs. GDPAN: -60.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
GDPAN' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: -67.4  Med: -21.70 Max: -3.6
Current: -60.34
-67.4
-3.6

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare: » details
Traded in other countries:GDP.USA, GXR.Germany, GDPPRD.USA, GDPPRC.USA,
Goodrich Petroleum Corp, formed in 1995, is an independent oil and natural gas company engaged in the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas on properties in South Texas, which includes the Eagle Ford Shale Trend, Northwest Louisiana and East Texas, which includes the Haynesville Shale and Cotton Valley Taylor Sand and Southwest Mississippi and Southeast Louisiana which includes the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale ("TMS"). As of December 31, 2013, it has acquired or farmed-in leases totaling approximately 45,100 gross (30,000 net) lease acres. In 2010, it began development and production activity in the Eagle Ford Shale and Buda Lime formations ("Eagle Ford Shale Trend") in La Salle and Frio Counties located in South Texas. As of December 31, 2013, it has acquired approximately 415,100 gross (306,400 net) lease acres in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale Trend, an emerging oil shale play in Southwest Mississippi and Southeast Louisiana. During 2013, it conducted drilling operations on 9 gross (5 net) wells and added 7 gross (3 net) wells to production in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale. As of December 31, 2013, it has acquired or farmed-in leases totaling approximately 112,100 gross (66,800 net) acres in the Haynesville Shale. During 2013, it added 13 gross (6 net) previously cased Haynesville Shale wells to production, with the majority of those wells (12 gross, 5 net) originating in Northwest Louisiana in its joint venture with Chesapeake Energy Corporation. Its Haynesville Shale drilling activities are located in five primary leasehold areas in Northeast Texas and Northwest Louisiana. As of December 31, 2013, it has acquired or farmed-in leases totaling approximately 42,200 gross (37,400 net) acres in the Cotton Valley Taylor Sand Trend. During 2013, it conducted workovers and recompletions on the existing wells in the area and did not drill any new wells. As of December 31, 2013, it maintained ownership interests in acreage and/or wells in several additional fields, including the Midway field in San Patricio County, Texas and the Garfield Unit in Kalkaska County, Michigan. The Company's operations are subject to stringent and complex federal, regional, state and local laws and regulations governing occupational health and safety, the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection.

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK