Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.31
PWR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
72% of the 1031 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. PWR: 0.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
PWR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.62 Max: 43855.67
Current: 0.31
0.01
43855.67
Equity-to-Asset 0.62
PWR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
82% of the 1007 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. PWR: 0.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
PWR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.61 Max: 0.78
Current: 0.62
0.31
0.78
Interest Coverage 21.55
PWR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
52% of the 862 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 24.43 vs. PWR: 21.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
PWR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.88  Med: 39.69 Max: 178.41
Current: 21.55
7.88
178.41
Piotroski F-Score: 8
Altman Z-Score: 4.00
Beneish M-Score: -2.73
WACC vs ROIC
7.07%
5.95%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 4.19
PWR's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
57% of the 1016 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.01 vs. PWR: 4.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
PWR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.14  Med: 6.55 Max: 7.86
Current: 4.19
3.14
7.86
Net Margin % 2.59
PWR's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
59% of the 1021 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.42 vs. PWR: 2.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
PWR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.59  Med: 4.2 Max: 6.27
Current: 2.59
2.59
6.27
ROE % 6.17
PWR's ROE % is ranked lower than
57% of the 1016 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.81 vs. PWR: 6.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
PWR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.93  Med: 6.63 Max: 10.05
Current: 6.17
3.93
10.05
ROA % 3.72
PWR's ROA % is ranked higher than
56% of the 1038 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.13 vs. PWR: 3.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
PWR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.93  Med: 4.74 Max: 7.35
Current: 3.72
2.93
7.35
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 15.40
PWR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
54% of the 1030 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 17.74 vs. PWR: 15.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
PWR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.85  Med: 20.35 Max: 29.84
Current: 15.4
10.85
29.84
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 17.70
PWR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
88% of the 845 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.70 vs. PWR: 17.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
PWR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.1  Med: 6.7 Max: 103.5
Current: 17.7
-18.1
103.5
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -0.90
PWR's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
68% of the 691 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.90 vs. PWR: -0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
PWR' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -53.3  Med: 16.9 Max: 133.8
Current: -0.9
-53.3
133.8
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -10.00
PWR's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
73% of the 632 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.60 vs. PWR: -10.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
PWR' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.2  Med: 23.1 Max: 95.5
Current: -10
-23.2
95.5
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Quanta Services Inc $PWR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» PWR's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-24 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

PWR Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Steven Cohen 1,000,010 sh (New)
David Dreman 44,886 sh (+1.72%)
Chris Davis 533,670 sh (+0.14%)
Chuck Royce 7,000 sh (unchged)
Columbia Wanger Sold Out
Keeley Asset Management Corp Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt 261,663 sh (-5.66%)
Paul Tudor Jones 9,004 sh (-78.45%)
» More
Q2 2016

PWR Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Ray Dalio 26,400 sh (New)
Jim Simons 423,199 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 307,954 sh (+3320.19%)
Steven Cohen 1,538,410 sh (+53.84%)
Joel Greenblatt 291,517 sh (+11.41%)
Chris Davis Sold Out
Chuck Royce Sold Out
David Dreman 43,058 sh (-4.07%)
» More
Q3 2016

PWR Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 479,000 sh (+55.54%)
Steven Cohen 1,693,700 sh (+10.09%)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Jim Simons 414,899 sh (-1.96%)
David Dreman 40,549 sh (-5.83%)
Joel Greenblatt 115,395 sh (-60.42%)
» More
Q4 2016

PWR Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons Sold Out
David Dreman 37,850 sh (-6.66%)
Steven Cohen 423,000 sh (-75.03%)
Paul Tudor Jones 108,893 sh (-77.27%)
Joel Greenblatt 9,858 sh (-91.46%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with PWR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Engineering & Construction » Engineering & Construction    NAICS: 238210    SIC: 1731
Compare:OTCPK:COABF, NYSE:ACM, OTCPK:PUODY, OTCPK:BCKIF, OTCPK:JGCCF, OTCPK:SNCAF, NYSE:JEC, NYSE:EME, OTCPK:KAJMY, OTCPK:WSPOF, OTCPK:SHMUY, OTCPK:NCCBF, NYSE:MTZ, NYSE:CBI, NYSE:FLR, NYSE:STN, NYSE:DY, NAS:TTEK, OTCPK:CCOHF, OTCPK:BAFBF » details
Traded in other countries:QAA.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Quanta Services Inc is a provider of specialty contracting services. The Company offers infrastructure solutions to the electric power and oil and gas industries in North America and in select international markets.

Quanta Services Inc was organized as a corporation in the state of Delaware in 1997. The Company provides specialty contracting services, offering infrastructure solutions to the electric power and oil and gas industries in the United States, Canada and Australia and select other international markets. The services it provides include the design, installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of infrastructure within each of the industries it serve, such as electric power transmission and distribution networks, substation facilities, renewable energy facilities, pipeline transmission and distribution systems and facilities, and infrastructure services for the offshore and inland water energy markets. The Company also owns fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in select markets and license the right to use these point-to-point fiber optic telecommunications facilities to customers. The Company's business segments are Electric Power Infrastructure Services, and Oil and Gas Infrastructure Services. The Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment provides network solutions to customers in the electric power industry. Services performed by the Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design, installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of electric power transmission and distribution infrastructure and substation facilities along with other engineering and technical services. The Oil and Gas Infrastructure Services segment provides infrastructure solutions to customers involved in the development and transportation of natural gas, oil and other pipeline products. Services performed by the Oil and Gas Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design, installation, repair and maintenance of pipeline transmission and distribution systems, gathering systems, production systems and compressor and pump stations, as well as related trenching, directional boring and automatic welding services. The Company's customers include electric power and oil and gas companies, as well as commercial, industrial and governmental entities- Ameren Corporation, Georgia Power, ITC Holdings Corp., Australia Pacific LNG, Northeast Utilities System, First Energy, Southern California Edison Co., Xcel Energy Inc., ExxonMobil Corporation and First Energy. The Company's operations are subject to numerous federal, state, local and international environmental laws and regulations governing its operations, including the handling, transportation and disposal of non-hazardous and hazardous substances and wastes, as well as emissions and discharges into the environment, including discharges to air, surface water, groundwater and soil.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 27.91
PWR's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
75% of the 804 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.80 vs. PWR: 27.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
PWR' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.8  Med: 24.65 Max: 196.83
Current: 27.91
9.8
196.83
Forward PE Ratio 18.32
PWR's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
74% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 17.06 vs. PWR: 18.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 27.91
PWR's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
74% of the 801 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.67 vs. PWR: 27.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
PWR' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.77  Med: 27.26 Max: 214.73
Current: 27.91
14.77
214.73
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 37.94
PWR's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
84% of the 491 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 13.16 vs. PWR: 37.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
PWR' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.1  Med: 36.9 Max: 646.09
Current: 37.94
6.1
646.09
PB Ratio 1.54
PWR's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
58% of the 1003 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. PWR: 1.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
PWR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 1.47 Max: 4.77
Current: 1.54
0.86
4.77
PS Ratio 0.73
PWR's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
55% of the 982 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. PWR: 0.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
PWR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 1.05 Max: 2.02
Current: 0.73
0.47
2.02
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 34.44
PWR's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
82% of the 352 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.14 vs. PWR: 34.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
PWR' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.54  Med: 36.11 Max: 1218.95
Current: 34.44
8.54
1218.95
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 14.91
PWR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
68% of the 448 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.07 vs. PWR: 14.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
PWR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.7  Med: 18.16 Max: 62.05
Current: 14.91
5.7
62.05
EV-to-EBIT 17.10
PWR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
69% of the 1022 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.82 vs. PWR: 17.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
PWR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.1  Med: 15.8 Max: 45.5
Current: 17.1
9.1
45.5
EV-to-EBITDA 10.52
PWR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
57% of the 1058 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.37 vs. PWR: 10.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
PWR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.4  Med: 10.5 Max: 30.4
Current: 10.52
6.4
30.4
PEG Ratio 3.44
PWR's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
80% of the 343 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. PWR: 3.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
PWR' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 1.69 Max: 23.22
Current: 3.44
0.36
23.22
Shiller PE Ratio 28.85
PWR's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 20.34 vs. PWR: 28.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
PWR' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.35  Med: 52.57 Max: 168.54
Current: 28.85
16.35
168.54
Current Ratio 1.90
PWR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
72% of the 957 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. PWR: 1.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
PWR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.15  Med: 2.39 Max: 3.39
Current: 1.9
1.15
3.39
Quick Ratio 1.83
PWR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
77% of the 957 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. PWR: 1.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
PWR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.09  Med: 2.3 Max: 3.27
Current: 1.83
1.09
3.27
Days Inventory 4.41
PWR's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
83% of the 840 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 25.59 vs. PWR: 4.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
PWR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.96  Med: 3.83 Max: 5.74
Current: 4.41
1.96
5.74
Days Sales Outstanding 71.56
PWR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
50% of the 742 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 72.76 vs. PWR: 71.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
PWR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 71.56  Med: 80.01 Max: 98.9
Current: 71.56
71.56
98.9
Days Payable 29.12
PWR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
80% of the 657 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 82.51 vs. PWR: 29.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
PWR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.83  Med: 27.76 Max: 68.96
Current: 29.12
24.83
68.96

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 12.10
PWR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
99% of the 497 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: -2.30 vs. PWR: 12.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
PWR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26.4  Med: -10 Max: 12.1
Current: 12.1
-26.4
12.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 18.75
PWR's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
94% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.11 vs. PWR: 18.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
PWR' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.8  Med: 8.92 Max: 43.73
Current: 18.75
6.8
43.73
Price-to-Tangible-Book 3.31
PWR's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
79% of the 913 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.47 vs. PWR: 3.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
PWR' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.15  Med: 3.25 Max: 23.24
Current: 3.31
1.15
23.24
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.30
PWR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
57% of the 472 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. PWR: 1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
PWR' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.01  Med: 1.37 Max: 5.22
Current: 1.3
1.01
5.22
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 1.62
PWR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
78% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. PWR: 1.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.69
PWR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
86% of the 840 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. PWR: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
PWR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.15  Med: 0.96 Max: 1.5
Current: 0.69
0.15
1.5
Price-to-Graham-Number 2.03
PWR's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
77% of the 630 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.98 vs. PWR: 2.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
PWR' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.52  Med: 1.93 Max: 6.03
Current: 2.03
1.52
6.03
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.85
PWR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
56% of the 1251 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.84 vs. PWR: 5.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
PWR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.2  Med: 6.3 Max: 11
Current: 5.85
2.2
11
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 3.23
PWR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
59% of the 495 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.44 vs. PWR: 3.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
PWR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2  Med: 13.3 Max: 50.1
Current: 3.23
2
50.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $7,651
EPS (TTM) $ 1.27
Beta0.85
Short Percentage of Float3.80%
52-Week Range $21.60 - 38.82
Shares Outstanding (Mil)148.56

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 8,189 8,691 8,916
EPS ($) 1.94 2.28 2.60
EPS without NRI ($) 1.94 2.28 2.60
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
8.00%
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for PWR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Quanta Services Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Release & Conference Call Schedule Apr 27 2017 
ViZn Energy Systems and The Ryan Company Announce Strategic Partnership Sep 15 2016 
5 Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Aug 03 2016 
Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Jul 07 2016 
POCML 3 Inc. Enters Into Binding Letter Agreement With Neo Lithium Corp. to Complete Qualifying Tran Mar 04 2016 
5 Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Jan 29 2016 
5 Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Nov 19 2015 
Seven Best Stocks for Value Investors This Week Oct 28 2015 
Weekly Three-Year Low Highlights: MSC Industrial Direct, Quanta Services, Sally Beauty, Urban Outfit Oct 19 2015 
Five Undervalued Companies for the Defensive Investor Near 52-Week Lows – August 2015 Aug 07 2015 

More From Other Websites
Quanta Services Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Release & Conference Call Schedule Apr 27 2017
ETFs with exposure to Quanta Services, Inc. : April 12, 2017 Apr 12 2017
Quanta Services, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : PWR-US : March 31,... Mar 31 2017
Quanta Services To Host & Webcast Investor Day From Its World Class Training Facility On April 4,... Mar 28 2017
Will Quanta Services Grow with Trump Infrastructure Plan? Mar 24 2017
Quanta Services (PWR) Down 3.6% Since Earnings Report: Can It Rebound? Mar 24 2017
Quanta Services Announces Resolution of Litigation With Dycom Industries Mar 14 2017
Will Heavy Construction's Rebound Receive A Trump Infrastructure Boost? Feb 24 2017
Quanta Services, Inc. :PWR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : February 22, 2017 Feb 22 2017
Edited Transcript of PWR earnings conference call or presentation 21-Feb-17 2:00pm GMT Feb 21 2017
Stocks Higher In Afternoon; Nvidia Makes Another Case For Support Feb 21 2017
Quanta Services' (PWR) Q4 Earnings Miss, Revenues Up Y/Y Feb 21 2017
Quanta Services (PWR) Q4 Earnings Miss, Posts Record Sales Feb 21 2017
Quanta Services misses Street 4Q forecasts Feb 21 2017
Quanta Services Reports 2016 Fourth Quarter And Annual Results Feb 21 2017
Quanta Services (PWR) Q4 Earnings: What's in the Cards? Feb 16 2017
Quanta Services Announces Fourth Quarter 2016 Earnings Release & Conference Call Schedule Feb 14 2017
Hidden Buying Pressure Lifting S&P 500 Stocks Feb 03 2017
Stocks, ETFs to Watch During Donald Trump's Presidency Jan 20 2017
Here's Why Quanta Services' Bull Run Continues into 2017 Jan 10 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)