Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.38
PWR's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
66% of the 1020 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.88 vs. PWR: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
PWR' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.67 Max: 43855.67
Current: 0.38
0.01
43855.67
Equity to Asset 0.60
PWR's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
81% of the 993 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. PWR: 0.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
PWR' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.63 Max: 0.8
Current: 0.6
0.31
0.8
Interest Coverage 18.67
PWR's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
58% of the 765 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.47 vs. PWR: 18.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
PWR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.83  Med: 40.87 Max: 197.5
Current: 18.67
2.83
197.5
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 3.09
M-Score: -2.96
WACC vs ROIC
6.89%
2.35%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 2.57
PWR's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 1006 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 4.81 vs. PWR: 2.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
PWR' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.14  Med: 6.45 Max: 8.08
Current: 2.57
3.14
8.08
Net-margin (%) 3.74
PWR's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
57% of the 1010 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.16 vs. PWR: 3.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
PWR' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.82  Med: 4.26 Max: 6.16
Current: 3.74
0.82
6.16
ROE (%) 7.75
PWR's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
50% of the 994 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.72 vs. PWR: 7.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
PWR' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.44  Med: 6.82 Max: 10.05
Current: 7.75
2.44
10.05
ROA (%) 4.94
PWR's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
70% of the 1026 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.94 vs. PWR: 4.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
PWR' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.09  Med: 4.87 Max: 7.35
Current: 4.94
1.09
7.35
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 8.65
PWR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 1016 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 17.38 vs. PWR: 8.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
PWR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.85  Med: 21.43 Max: 32.41
Current: 8.65
10.85
32.41
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 11.70
PWR's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
78% of the 877 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.10 vs. PWR: 11.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
PWR' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18  Med: 6.15 Max: 32.6
Current: 11.7
-18
32.6
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -8.90
PWR's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
75% of the 700 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.20 vs. PWR: -8.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
PWR' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -53.3  Med: 18.65 Max: 49.7
Current: -8.9
-53.3
49.7
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -23.20
PWR's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
81% of the 640 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.60 vs. PWR: -23.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
PWR' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.2  Med: 27.40 Max: 75.4
Current: -23.2
-23.2
75.4
» PWR's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-08-05)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

PWR Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Joel Greenblatt 119,983 sh (New)
David Dreman 47,738 sh (+44.86%)
John Keeley 181,155 sh (+16.51%)
Columbia Wanger 4,082,357 sh (+1.20%)
Chuck Royce 7,000 sh (unchged)
Chris Davis 409,190 sh (-0.10%)
Steven Cohen 3,242,108 sh (-30.70%)
Paul Tudor Jones 18,540 sh (-45.09%)
Jim Simons 58,499 sh (-92.41%)
» More
Q3 2015

PWR Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Ray Dalio 29,807 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 580,240 sh (+383.60%)
Paul Tudor Jones 77,054 sh (+315.61%)
John Keeley 243,925 sh (+34.65%)
Chris Davis 460,970 sh (+12.65%)
Columbia Wanger 4,085,739 sh (+0.08%)
Chuck Royce 7,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
David Dreman 47,610 sh (-0.27%)
» More
Q4 2015

PWR Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Chris Davis 532,920 sh (+15.61%)
Columbia Wanger 4,422,136 sh (+8.23%)
Chuck Royce 7,000 sh (unchged)
David Dreman 44,129 sh (-7.31%)
Paul Tudor Jones 41,788 sh (-45.77%)
Joel Greenblatt 277,348 sh (-52.20%)
Ray Dalio 11,628 sh (-60.99%)
John Keeley 72,695 sh (-70.20%)
» More
Q1 2016

PWR Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Steven Cohen 1,000,010 sh (New)
David Dreman 44,886 sh (+1.72%)
Chris Davis 533,670 sh (+0.14%)
Chuck Royce 7,000 sh (unchged)
Columbia Wanger Sold Out
John Keeley Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt 261,663 sh (-5.66%)
Paul Tudor Jones 9,004 sh (-78.45%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with PWR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Engineering & Construction » Engineering & Construction
Compare:OTCPK:SMNUF, NYSE:CBI, OTCPK:WSPOF, OTCPK:JGCCF, NYSE:EME, NYSE:STN, NYSE:DY, OTCPK:ACXIF, OTCPK:PEABF, OTCPK:BAFBF, OTCPK:KKWFF, OTCPK:IPGOF, OTCPK:OBSJF, NYSE:ACM, NYSE:KBR, NYSE:MTZ, OTCPK:PYOIF, NAS:TTEK, OTCPK:CHYCY, OTCPK:CIOIF » details
Traded in other countries:QAA.Germany,
Quanta Services Inc is a provider of specialty contracting services. The Company offers infrastructure solutions to the electric power and oil and gas industries in North America and in select international markets.

Quanta Services Inc was organized as a corporation in the state of Delaware in 1997. The Company provides specialty contracting services, offering infrastructure solutions to the electric power and oil and gas industries in the United States, Canada and Australia and select other international markets. The services it provides include the design, installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of infrastructure within each of the industries it serve, such as electric power transmission and distribution networks, substation facilities, renewable energy facilities, pipeline transmission and distribution systems and facilities, and infrastructure services for the offshore and inland water energy markets. The Company also owns fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in select markets and license the right to use these point-to-point fiber optic telecommunications facilities to customers. The Company's business segments are Electric Power Infrastructure Services, Oil and Gas Infrastructure Services and Fiber Optic Licensing & Other. The Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment provides network solutions to customers in the electric power industry. Services performed by the Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design, installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of electric power transmission and distribution infrastructure and substation facilities along with other engineering and technical services. The Oil and Gas Infrastructure Services segment provides infrastructure solutions to customers involved in the development and transportation of natural gas, oil and other pipeline products. Services performed by the Oil and Gas Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design, installation, repair and maintenance of pipeline transmission and distribution systems, gathering systems, production systems and compressor and pump stations, as well as related trenching, directional boring and automatic welding services. The Fiber Optic Licensing and Other segment designs, procures, constructs, maintains and owns fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in select markets and licenses the right to use these point-to-point fiber optic telecommunications facilities to its customers pursuant to licensing agreements, typically with terms from five to twenty-five years, inclusive of certain renewal options. The Company's customers include electric power and oil and gas companies, as well as commercial, industrial and governmental entities- Ameren Corporation, Georgia Power, ITC Holdings Corp., Australia Pacific LNG, Northeast Utilities System, First Energy, Southern California Edison Co., Xcel Energy Inc., ExxonMobil Corporation and First Energy. The Company's operations are subject to numerous federal, state, local and international environmental laws and regulations governing its operations, including the handling, transportation and disposal of non-hazardous and hazardous substances and wa

Top Ranked Articles about Quanta Services Inc

Weekly Three-Year Low Highlights: MSC Industrial Direct, Quanta Services, Sally Beauty, Urban Outfitters Stock prices for some companies fall to three-year lows
According to GuruFocus list of three-year lows, MSC Industrial Direct Co. Inc. (NYSE:MSM), Quanta Services Inc. (NYSE:PWR), Sally Beauty Holdings Inc. (NYSE:SBH) and Urban Outfitters Inc. (NASDAQ:URBN) have all reached their three-year lows. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 20.88
PWR's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
59% of the 795 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 12.80 vs. PWR: 20.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
PWR' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.77  Med: 34.44 Max: 737.2
Current: 20.88
14.77
737.2
Forward P/E 12.85
PWR's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
53% of the 118 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 12.74 vs. PWR: 12.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 41.36
PWR's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
89% of the 795 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 12.87 vs. PWR: 41.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
PWR' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.77  Med: 27.28 Max: 214.73
Current: 41.36
14.77
214.73
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 6.50
PWR's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked higher than
68% of the 445 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.57 vs. PWR: 6.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
PWR' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.1  Med: 39.16 Max: 805
Current: 6.5
6.1
805
P/B 1.06
PWR's P/B is ranked lower than
52% of the 983 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. PWR: 1.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
PWR' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 1.50 Max: 4.78
Current: 1.06
0.86
4.78
P/S 0.56
PWR's P/S is ranked lower than
57% of the 978 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. PWR: 0.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
PWR' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 1.06 Max: 2.02
Current: 0.56
0.47
2.02
PFCF 9.36
PWR's PFCF is ranked lower than
54% of the 327 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.93 vs. PWR: 9.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
PWR' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.77  Med: 39.15 Max: 1218.95
Current: 9.36
8.77
1218.95
POCF 6.46
PWR's POCF is ranked higher than
52% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.27 vs. PWR: 6.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
PWR' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.8  Med: 19.62 Max: 62.05
Current: 6.46
5.8
62.05
EV-to-EBIT 17.96
PWR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
76% of the 789 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.87 vs. PWR: 17.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
PWR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.1  Med: 15.70 Max: 48
Current: 17.96
9.1
48
EV-to-EBITDA 8.78
PWR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
56% of the 822 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.19 vs. PWR: 8.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
PWR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.4  Med: 10.50 Max: 30.4
Current: 8.78
6.4
30.4
PEG 4.87
PWR's PEG is ranked lower than
83% of the 332 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. PWR: 4.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
PWR' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 1.54 Max: 8.88
Current: 4.87
0.36
8.88
Shiller P/E 32.92
PWR's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
67% of the 154 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.39 vs. PWR: 32.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
PWR' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.5  Med: 63.53 Max: 182.58
Current: 32.92
16.5
182.58
Current Ratio 1.82
PWR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
71% of the 934 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.44 vs. PWR: 1.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
PWR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.15  Med: 2.41 Max: 3.74
Current: 1.82
1.15
3.74
Quick Ratio 1.76
PWR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
76% of the 934 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. PWR: 1.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
PWR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.09  Med: 2.31 Max: 3.66
Current: 1.76
1.09
3.66
Days Inventory 3.51
PWR's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
86% of the 844 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 26.30 vs. PWR: 3.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
PWR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.95  Med: 3.83 Max: 5.48
Current: 3.51
1.95
5.48
Days Sales Outstanding 73.41
PWR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
52% of the 775 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 70.97 vs. PWR: 73.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
PWR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 71.16  Med: 79.34 Max: 98.9
Current: 73.41
71.16
98.9
Days Payable 25.26
PWR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
84% of the 718 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 74.42 vs. PWR: 25.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
PWR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.83  Med: 27.39 Max: 68.96
Current: 25.26
24.83
68.96

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 27.40
PWR's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
94% of the 479 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.89 vs. PWR: 27.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
PWR' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.55  Med: 9.92 Max: 123.79
Current: 27.4
5.55
123.79
Price/Tangible Book 2.47
PWR's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
77% of the 892 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. PWR: 2.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
PWR' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.67  Med: 3.30 Max: 214.09
Current: 2.47
0.67
214.09
Price/Projected FCF 0.80
PWR's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
58% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.96 vs. PWR: 0.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
PWR' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.82  Med: 1.49 Max: 5.36
Current: 0.8
0.82
5.36
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 1.90
PWR's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
89% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.83 vs. PWR: 1.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 0.52
PWR's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
84% of the 906 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. PWR: 0.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
PWR' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 0.96 Max: 5.78
Current: 0.52
0.09
5.78
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 4.21
PWR's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
95% of the 219 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.84 vs. PWR: 4.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
PWR' s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.98  Med: 1.60 Max: 6.02
Current: 4.21
0.98
6.02
Price/Graham Number 2.13
PWR's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
87% of the 634 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.85 vs. PWR: 2.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
PWR' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41  Med: 2.30 Max: 21.73
Current: 2.13
1.41
21.73
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 5.60
PWR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
61% of the 982 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.60 vs. PWR: 5.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
PWR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 6.40 Max: 11
Current: 5.6
2.1
11
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 13.55
PWR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
63% of the 474 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.95 vs. PWR: 13.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
PWR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2  Med: 13.40 Max: 50.1
Current: 13.55
2
50.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $7,425
EPS (TTM) $ 1.05
Beta0.77
Short Percentage of Float4.11%
52-Week Range $16.77 - 29.49
Shares Outstanding (Mil)144.16

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 7,659 7,973 8,109
EPS ($) 1.62 1.96 2.10
EPS w/o NRI ($) 1.62 1.96 2.10
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
8.00%
» More Articles for PWR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
5 Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Jan 29 2016 
5 Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Nov 19 2015 
Seven Best Stocks for Value Investors This Week Oct 28 2015 
Weekly Three-Year Low Highlights: MSC Industrial Direct, Quanta Services, Sally Beauty, Urban Outfit Oct 19 2015 
Five Undervalued Companies for the Defensive Investor Near 52-Week Lows – August 2015 Aug 07 2015 
Royce Fund's Chip Skinner on the Rebound of Royce Value Plus Fund and Stock Ideas Dec 04 2012 
Cloud Computing: Many Stocks Are Already Expensive: STX, EMC, ATAP, WD, SNDK May 25 2011 
Quanta Services Inc. (PWR) CFO James H Haddox sells 35,000 Shares Jun 16 2010 
Quanta Services Inc. (PWR) CEO John R Colson sells 81,600 Shares Mar 04 2010 
Weekly Guru Bargain Highlights: Quanta Services Inc, World Fuel Services Corp, Palm Inc, American In Feb 20 2010 

More From Other Websites
Ready for a post-Brexit bounce? Jun 27 2016
Quanta Services, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : PWR-US : June 27,... Jun 27 2016
Quanta Services, Inc. – Value Analysis (NYSE:PWR) : June 20, 2016 Jun 20 2016
Quanta Services, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : PWR-US : June 14,... Jun 14 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Quanta Services, Inc. : June 6, 2016 Jun 06 2016
QUANTA SERVICES INC Files SEC form 8-K, Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Jun 01 2016
Quanta Services To Present At Several Institutional Investor Conferences In June May 25 2016
Quanta Services To Present At Several Institutional Investor Conferences In June May 25 2016
QUANTA SERVICES INC Financials May 18 2016
Quanta Services, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : PWR-US : May 18, 2016 May 18 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Quanta Services, Inc. : May 11, 2016 May 11 2016
QUANTA SERVICES INC Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report May 10 2016
Quanta Services, Inc. :PWR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2016 By the Numbers May 10 2016
Quanta Services (PWR) Misses Q1 Earnings, Outlook Raised May 05 2016
Edited Transcript of PWR earnings conference call or presentation 5-May-16 1:00pm GMT May 05 2016
The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Ball, Eaton Corporation, Quanta Services, Jacobs Engineering... May 05 2016
Q1 2016 Quanta Services Inc Earnings Release - Before Market Open May 05 2016
Dycom Industries, Inc. Files Amended Complaint Against Quanta Services, Inc. For Breach Of Contract May 05 2016
Quanta Services (PWR) Lags Q1 Earnings and Revenues May 05 2016
Dycom Industries, Inc. Files Amended Complaint Against Quanta Services, Inc. For Breach Of Contract May 05 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)