Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.40
PWR's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
66% of the 1030 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.93 vs. PWR: 0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
PWR' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.66 Max: 43855.67
Current: 0.4
0.01
43855.67
Equity to Asset 0.60
PWR's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
80% of the 980 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.41 vs. PWR: 0.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
PWR' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.63 Max: 0.8
Current: 0.6
0.31
0.8
Interest Coverage 12.97
PWR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
56% of the 855 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 19.72 vs. PWR: 12.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
PWR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.76  Med: 39.69 Max: 178.41
Current: 12.97
2.76
178.41
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 3.25
M-Score: -2.98
WACC vs ROIC
7.50%
1.97%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 2.14
PWR's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
70% of the 1014 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 4.73 vs. PWR: 2.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
PWR' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.14  Med: 6.55 Max: 7.86
Current: 2.14
2.14
7.86
Net-margin (%) 3.38
PWR's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
52% of the 1017 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.17 vs. PWR: 3.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
PWR' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.83  Med: 4.2 Max: 6.27
Current: 3.38
0.83
6.27
ROE (%) 7.37
PWR's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
51% of the 1002 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.24 vs. PWR: 7.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
PWR' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.44  Med: 6.63 Max: 10.05
Current: 7.37
2.44
10.05
ROA (%) 4.55
PWR's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
67% of the 1033 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.79 vs. PWR: 4.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
PWR' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.09  Med: 4.74 Max: 7.35
Current: 4.55
1.09
7.35
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 7.51
PWR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
70% of the 1022 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 17.75 vs. PWR: 7.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
PWR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.51  Med: 20.35 Max: 29.84
Current: 7.51
7.51
29.84
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 11.70
PWR's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
79% of the 864 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.80 vs. PWR: 11.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
PWR' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.1  Med: 6.6 Max: 40.5
Current: 11.7
-18.1
40.5
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -8.90
PWR's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
77% of the 692 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.10 vs. PWR: -8.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
PWR' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -53.3  Med: 18.85 Max: 61.4
Current: -8.9
-53.3
61.4
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -23.20
PWR's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
80% of the 637 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. PWR: -23.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
PWR' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.2  Med: 26.45 Max: 95.5
Current: -23.2
-23.2
95.5
» PWR's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-11-05)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2015

PWR Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Ray Dalio 29,807 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 580,240 sh (+383.60%)
Paul Tudor Jones 77,054 sh (+315.61%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 243,925 sh (+34.65%)
Chris Davis 460,970 sh (+12.65%)
Columbia Wanger 4,085,739 sh (+0.08%)
Chuck Royce 7,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
David Dreman 47,610 sh (-0.27%)
» More
Q4 2015

PWR Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Chris Davis 532,920 sh (+15.61%)
Columbia Wanger 4,422,136 sh (+8.23%)
Chuck Royce 7,000 sh (unchged)
David Dreman 44,129 sh (-7.31%)
Paul Tudor Jones 41,788 sh (-45.77%)
Joel Greenblatt 277,348 sh (-52.20%)
Ray Dalio 11,628 sh (-60.99%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 72,695 sh (-70.20%)
» More
Q1 2016

PWR Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Steven Cohen 1,000,010 sh (New)
David Dreman 44,886 sh (+1.72%)
Chris Davis 533,670 sh (+0.14%)
Chuck Royce 7,000 sh (unchged)
Columbia Wanger Sold Out
Keeley Asset Management Corp Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt 261,663 sh (-5.66%)
Paul Tudor Jones 9,004 sh (-78.45%)
» More
Q2 2016

PWR Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Ray Dalio 26,400 sh (New)
Jim Simons 423,199 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 307,954 sh (+3320.19%)
Steven Cohen 1,538,410 sh (+53.84%)
Joel Greenblatt 291,517 sh (+11.41%)
Chuck Royce Sold Out
Chris Davis Sold Out
David Dreman 43,058 sh (-4.07%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with PWR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Engineering & Construction » Engineering & Construction
Compare:OTCPK:JGCCF, OTCPK:ACXIF, NYSE:EME, OTCPK:NCCBF, NYSE:ACM, OTCPK:WSPOF, NYSE:CBI, OTCPK:COABF, NYSE:STN, NYSE:DY, OTCPK:BAFYY, OTCPK:ARVCY, NYSE:MTZ, OTCPK:PYOIF, OTCPK:CHYCY, NYSE:KBR, NAS:TTEK, OTCPK:TNISF, NYSE:GVA, OTCPK:AGRUF » details
Traded in other countries:QAA.Germany,
Quanta Services Inc is a provider of specialty contracting services. The Company offers infrastructure solutions to the electric power and oil and gas industries in North America and in select international markets.

Quanta Services Inc was organized as a corporation in the state of Delaware in 1997. The Company provides specialty contracting services, offering infrastructure solutions to the electric power and oil and gas industries in the United States, Canada and Australia and select other international markets. The services it provides include the design, installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of infrastructure within each of the industries it serve, such as electric power transmission and distribution networks, substation facilities, renewable energy facilities, pipeline transmission and distribution systems and facilities, and infrastructure services for the offshore and inland water energy markets. The Company also owns fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in select markets and license the right to use these point-to-point fiber optic telecommunications facilities to customers. The Company's business segments are Electric Power Infrastructure Services, Oil and Gas Infrastructure Services and Fiber Optic Licensing & Other. The Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment provides network solutions to customers in the electric power industry. Services performed by the Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design, installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of electric power transmission and distribution infrastructure and substation facilities along with other engineering and technical services. The Oil and Gas Infrastructure Services segment provides infrastructure solutions to customers involved in the development and transportation of natural gas, oil and other pipeline products. Services performed by the Oil and Gas Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design, installation, repair and maintenance of pipeline transmission and distribution systems, gathering systems, production systems and compressor and pump stations, as well as related trenching, directional boring and automatic welding services. The Fiber Optic Licensing and Other segment designs, procures, constructs, maintains and owns fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in select markets and licenses the right to use these point-to-point fiber optic telecommunications facilities to its customers pursuant to licensing agreements, typically with terms from five to twenty-five years, inclusive of certain renewal options. The Company's customers include electric power and oil and gas companies, as well as commercial, industrial and governmental entities- Ameren Corporation, Georgia Power, ITC Holdings Corp., Australia Pacific LNG, Northeast Utilities System, First Energy, Southern California Edison Co., Xcel Energy Inc., ExxonMobil Corporation and First Energy. The Company's operations are subject to numerous federal, state, local and international environmental laws and regulations governing its operations, including the handling, transportation and disposal of non-hazardous and hazardous substances and wa

Top Ranked Articles about Quanta Services Inc

Weekly Three-Year Low Highlights: MSC Industrial Direct, Quanta Services, Sally Beauty, Urban Outfitters Stock prices for some companies fall to three-year lows
According to GuruFocus list of three-year lows, MSC Industrial Direct Co. Inc. (NYSE:MSM), Quanta Services Inc. (NYSE:PWR), Sally Beauty Holdings Inc. (NYSE:SBH) and Urban Outfitters Inc. (NASDAQ:URBN) have all reached their three-year lows. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 19.30
PWR's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
61% of the 792 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 13.88 vs. PWR: 19.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
PWR' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.8  Med: 24.52 Max: 196.83
Current: 19.3
9.8
196.83
Forward P/E 13.64
PWR's Forward P/E is ranked higher than
54% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 13.97 vs. PWR: 13.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 56.71
PWR's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
88% of the 792 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 13.79 vs. PWR: 56.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
PWR' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.77  Med: 27.45 Max: 214.73
Current: 56.71
14.77
214.73
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 8.86
PWR's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked higher than
68% of the 454 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 12.85 vs. PWR: 8.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
PWR' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.1  Med: 38.36 Max: 805
Current: 8.86
6.1
805
P/B 1.22
PWR's P/B is ranked lower than
51% of the 965 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. PWR: 1.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
PWR' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 1.49 Max: 4.78
Current: 1.22
0.86
4.78
P/S 0.62
PWR's P/S is ranked lower than
55% of the 986 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.55 vs. PWR: 0.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
PWR' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 1.05 Max: 2.02
Current: 0.62
0.47
2.02
PFCF 13.10
PWR's PFCF is ranked lower than
58% of the 331 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.68 vs. PWR: 13.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
PWR' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.01  Med: 38.24 Max: 1218.95
Current: 13.1
9.01
1218.95
POCF 8.51
PWR's POCF is ranked lower than
52% of the 432 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.74 vs. PWR: 8.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
PWR' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.91  Med: 19.33 Max: 62.05
Current: 8.51
5.91
62.05
EV-to-EBIT 27.22
PWR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
81% of the 792 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.04 vs. PWR: 27.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
PWR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.1  Med: 15.85 Max: 48
Current: 27.22
9.1
48
EV-to-EBITDA 11.94
PWR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
64% of the 829 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.96 vs. PWR: 11.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
PWR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.4  Med: 10.6 Max: 30.4
Current: 11.94
6.4
30.4
PEG 6.08
PWR's PEG is ranked lower than
83% of the 344 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. PWR: 6.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
PWR' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 1.55 Max: 9.09
Current: 6.08
0.36
9.09
Shiller P/E 25.41
PWR's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
63% of the 163 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. PWR: 25.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
PWR' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.35  Med: 58.23 Max: 168.54
Current: 25.41
16.35
168.54
Current Ratio 1.86
PWR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
72% of the 951 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.45 vs. PWR: 1.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
PWR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.15  Med: 2.39 Max: 3.74
Current: 1.86
1.15
3.74
Quick Ratio 1.80
PWR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
77% of the 951 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. PWR: 1.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
PWR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.09  Med: 2.31 Max: 3.66
Current: 1.8
1.09
3.66
Days Inventory 3.87
PWR's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
84% of the 850 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 27.20 vs. PWR: 3.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
PWR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.96  Med: 3.83 Max: 5.74
Current: 3.87
1.96
5.74
Days Sales Outstanding 68.80
PWR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
51% of the 729 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 70.49 vs. PWR: 68.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
PWR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 68.8  Med: 81.91 Max: 98.9
Current: 68.8
68.8
98.9

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 10.50
PWR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
99% of the 517 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: -2.20 vs. PWR: 10.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
PWR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -83.1  Med: -11.8 Max: 10.5
Current: 10.5
-83.1
10.5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 27.25
PWR's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
93% of the 492 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.97 vs. PWR: 27.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
PWR' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.55  Med: 9.93 Max: 123.79
Current: 27.25
5.55
123.79
Price/Tangible Book 2.86
PWR's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
76% of the 873 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. PWR: 2.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
PWR' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.67  Med: 3.3 Max: 214.09
Current: 2.86
0.67
214.09
Price/Projected FCF 0.96
PWR's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
60% of the 462 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.10 vs. PWR: 0.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
PWR' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 1.48 Max: 5.36
Current: 0.96
0.8
5.36
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 2.70
PWR's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
88% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. PWR: 2.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 0.63
PWR's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
87% of the 902 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.06 vs. PWR: 0.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
PWR' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 0.97 Max: 8.53
Current: 0.63
0.09
8.53
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 8.85
PWR's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
97% of the 204 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.88 vs. PWR: 8.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
PWR' s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.92  Med: 1.64 Max: 8.86
Current: 8.85
0.92
8.86
Price/Graham Number 2.69
PWR's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
85% of the 636 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.91 vs. PWR: 2.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
PWR' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41  Med: 2.28 Max: 21.73
Current: 2.69
1.41
21.73
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 3.71
PWR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
64% of the 996 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.80 vs. PWR: 3.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
PWR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 6.3 Max: 11
Current: 3.71
2.1
11
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 8.96
PWR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
54% of the 479 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.60 vs. PWR: 8.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
PWR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2  Med: 12.4 Max: 50.1
Current: 8.96
2
50.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $7,345
EPS (TTM) $ 1.44
Beta0.84
Short Percentage of Float5.20%
52-Week Range $16.77 - 27.85
Shares Outstanding (Mil)144.19

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 7,704 8,046 8,365
EPS ($) 1.64 1.95 2.12
EPS w/o NRI ($) 1.64 1.95 2.12
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends Per Share ($)
» More Articles for PWR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
5 Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Aug 03 2016 
Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Jul 07 2016 
5 Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Jan 29 2016 
5 Undervalued Companies With a Low Beta Nov 19 2015 
Seven Best Stocks for Value Investors This Week Oct 28 2015 
Weekly Three-Year Low Highlights: MSC Industrial Direct, Quanta Services, Sally Beauty, Urban Outfit Oct 19 2015 
Five Undervalued Companies for the Defensive Investor Near 52-Week Lows – August 2015 Aug 07 2015 
Royce Fund's Chip Skinner on the Rebound of Royce Value Plus Fund and Stock Ideas Dec 04 2012 
Cloud Computing: Many Stocks Are Already Expensive: STX, EMC, ATAP, WD, SNDK May 25 2011 
Quanta Services Inc. (PWR) CFO James H Haddox sells 35,000 Shares Jun 16 2010 

More From Other Websites
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Signs Construction Contract With Spring Ridge Constructors Sep 21 2016
Quanta Services, Inc. – Value Analysis (NYSE:PWR) : September 14, 2016 Sep 14 2016
Quanta Services, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : PWR-US : September... Sep 13 2016
ViZn Energy Systems and The Ryan Company Announce Strategic Partnership Sep 12 2016
QUANTA SERVICES INC Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Financial... Sep 08 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Quanta Services, Inc. : September 6, 2016 Sep 06 2016
3 Top Infrastructure Stocks to Buy Regardless of Who Wins Presidency Sep 06 2016
Can Quanta Services Trump Headwinds on Pipeline Strength? Sep 06 2016
Quanta Services to Present at D.A. Davidson Engineering & Construction Conference Sep 02 2016
Quanta Services to Present at 5th Annual investMNt Conference Aug 22 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Quanta Services, Inc. : August 18, 2016 Aug 18 2016
QUANTA SERVICES INC Financials Aug 17 2016
QUANTA SERVICES INC Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Aug 08 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Quanta Services, Inc. : August 8, 2016 Aug 08 2016
Quanta Services, Inc. :PWR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2016 By the Numbers : August 8, 2016 Aug 08 2016
Quanta Services upgraded by Stifel Aug 05 2016
Quanta Services, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : PWR-US : August 5,... Aug 05 2016
Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Drops on Q2 Earnings Miss Aug 04 2016
Edited Transcript of PWR earnings conference call or presentation 4-Aug-16 1:00pm GMT Aug 04 2016
[$$] Three Picks to Play Oil Pipelines Aug 04 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)