Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.76
RE's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
66% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 3.44 vs. RE: 0.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
RE' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.42 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.76
Equity-to-Asset 0.38
RE's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
64% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 0.33 vs. RE: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
RE' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 0.29 Max: 0.38
Current: 0.38
0.22
0.38
Interest Coverage 30.36
RE's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
55% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 355.50 vs. RE: 30.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
RE' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.59  Med: 23.93 Max: 37.53
Current: 30.36
10.59
37.53
Beneish M-Score: -2.44
WACC vs ROIC
5.49%
13.37%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 18.98
RE's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
74% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 9.33 vs. RE: 18.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
RE' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.98  Med: 19.9 Max: 27.57
Current: 18.98
-4.98
27.57
Net Margin % 17.20
RE's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
79% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 8.25 vs. RE: 17.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
RE' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.71  Med: 17.02 Max: 22.33
Current: 17.2
-1.71
22.33
ROE % 12.46
RE's ROE % is ranked higher than
69% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 9.40 vs. RE: 12.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
RE' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.3  Med: 12.9 Max: 18.38
Current: 12.46
-1.3
18.38
ROA % 4.68
RE's ROA % is ranked higher than
74% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 2.30 vs. RE: 4.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
RE' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.43  Med: 4.63 Max: 6.36
Current: 4.68
-0.43
6.36
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 6.60
RE's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
62% of the 56 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 3.40 vs. RE: 6.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
RE' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.3  Med: 11.5 Max: 35.6
Current: 6.6
-10.3
35.6
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -5.80
RE's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
73% of the 49 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 2.80 vs. RE: -5.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
RE' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 4.7 Max: 260.3
Current: -5.8
0
260.3
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -2.40
RE's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
60% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 1.70 vs. RE: -2.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
RE' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -57.1  Med: 11.9 Max: 588.2
Current: -2.4
-57.1
588.2
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with Everest Re Group Ltd $RE.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» RE's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-04-26)


Revenue & Net Income
Equity & Asset
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

RE Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 2,700 sh (New)
Jim Simons 204,200 sh (+145.14%)
Jeremy Grantham 194,050 sh (+79.89%)
Richard Pzena 91,636 sh (+17.42%)
Donald Smith 385,264 sh (+0.31%)
David Dreman 234 sh (unchged)
Chris Davis 198,772 sh (-3.02%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 1,509 sh (-13.77%)
Scott Black 8,973 sh (-30.55%)
Mason Hawkins 1,325,181 sh (-40.55%)
» More
Q2 2016

RE Guru Trades in Q2 2016

John Hussman 700 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 5,247 sh (+94.33%)
Scott Black 12,076 sh (+34.58%)
Jim Simons 250,500 sh (+22.67%)
Jeremy Grantham 237,954 sh (+22.63%)
Donald Smith 394,973 sh (+2.52%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 1,519 sh (+0.66%)
Richard Pzena 91,689 sh (+0.06%)
David Dreman Sold Out
Chris Davis 198,272 sh (-0.25%)
Mason Hawkins 1,271,334 sh (-4.06%)
» More
Q3 2016

RE Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 270,700 sh (+8.06%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 1,528 sh (+0.59%)
Richard Pzena 91,703 sh (+0.02%)
John Hussman 700 sh (unchged)
Donald Smith 394,981 sh (unchged)
Chris Davis 197,762 sh (-0.26%)
Scott Black 11,379 sh (-5.77%)
Mason Hawkins 1,119,672 sh (-11.93%)
Jeremy Grantham 143,034 sh (-39.89%)
Paul Tudor Jones 2,155 sh (-58.93%)
» More
Q4 2016

RE Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 2,997 sh (+39.07%)
Richard Pzena 92,660 sh (+1.04%)
Chris Davis 197,762 sh (unchged)
Keeley Asset Management Corp Sold Out
Scott Black 10,517 sh (-7.58%)
Mason Hawkins 1,017,743 sh (-9.10%)
Donald Smith 347,583 sh (-12.00%)
John Hussman 600 sh (-14.29%)
Jeremy Grantham 94,139 sh (-34.18%)
Jim Simons 169,700 sh (-37.31%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with RE

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Insurance - Specialty » Insurance - Reinsurance    NAICS: 524130    SIC: 6331
Compare:NAS:ACGL, NYSE:RGA, OTCPK:HVRRY, OTCPK:SCRYY, NYSE:PRE, NYSE:RNR, NYSE:VR, NYSE:AHL, NYSE:TPRE, NAS:MHLD, OTCPK:TIEFF, NAS:WMIH, NYSE:BCRH, NAS:OXBR, NAS:TIL, OTCPK:SSREY, OTCPK:MURGY » details
Traded in other countries:ERE.Germany,
Headquarter Location:Bermuda
Everest Re Group Ltd through its subsidiaries, provides property and casualty reinsurance & insurance products and services in the US, Bermuda and other markets. It also provides treaty and facultative reinsurance and admitted & non-admitted insurance.

Everest Re Group Ltd is an insurance and reinsurance company with a distribution network. The company's segments include: the U.S. Reinsurance segment which writes property and casualty reinsurance and special lines of business comprising of Marine, Aviation, Surety and Accident & Health business; the International segment which focuses on several international reinsurance markets including Canada, Asia, Latin America, Brazil, Africa and the Middle East; the Bermuda segment which writes property and casualty reinsurance through Bermuda Re, the U.K. branch and Ireland Re; and the Insurance segment which writes insurance including medical stop loss insurance; and the Mt. Logan Re segment provides insurance products against catastrophe risks.

Top Ranked Articles about Everest Re Group Ltd

Mason Hawkins Sells More Than 93% of Aon Holdings Guru exits positions in National Oilwell Varco and McDonald's
Mason Hawkins (Trades, Portfolio) of Southeastern Asset Management made his biggest transaction of the first quarter not with an acquisition but with the near divestiture of a stake. Read more...
Rock Energy Inc. Reports Q1 2016 Results

CALGARY, ALBERTA--(Marketwired - May 11, 2016) - Rock Energy Inc. (TSX:RE) ("Rock" or the "Company") is pleased to report its financial and operating results for three months ended March 31, 2016. Copies of Rock's audited financial statements and related management's discussion and analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2016 have been filed on the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com and may be obtained on Rock's website at www.rockenergy.ca. Rock is a Calgary-based crude oil exploration, development and production company. CORPORATE SUMMARY







FINANCIAL




Three months ended March 31,
2016

2015












Crude oil and natural gas revenue ('000)
$
5,087

$
17,466












Funds from operations ('000) (1)
$
2,103

$
6,158




Per share










- basic
$
0.04

$
0.14





- diluted
$
0.04

$
0.14












Net loss ('000)
$
(5,354
)
$
(4,178
)



Per share










- basic
$
(0.11
)
$
(0.10
)




- diluted
$
(0.11
)
$
(0.10
)











Total net capital expenditures ('000) (2)
$
785

$
14,353












As at March 31,

2016


2015



Net debt ('000) (1)
$
58,382

$
63,154



Common shares outstanding

47,519,245


46,971,997



Options outstanding

3,536,166


2,980,981























OPERATIONS




Three months ended March 31,
2016

2015












Average daily production









Crude oil and natural gas liquids (bbls/d)

2,775


5,011




Natural gas (mcf/d)

706


864




Barrels of oil equivalent (boe/d)

2,893


5,155












Average product prices









Crude oil and natural gas liquids ($/bbl)
$
19.98

$
38.22




Natural gas ($/mcf)
$
1.57

$
2.96




Total ($/boe)
$
19.33

$
37.65












Operating netback ($/boe) (2)(3)
$
1.01

$
16.70











(1)
Funds from operations and net debt are considered key financial metrics; Refer to the "Key Financial Metrics" section at the end of this MD&A for definitions.


(2)
Operating netback and total net capital expenditures are considered Non-GAAP measures; Refer to the "Non-GAAP Measures" section at the end of this MD&A.


(3)
Operating netback exclude realized hedging gains of $13.87 per boe for the three months ended March 31, 2016. As at March 31, 2015 the Company did not have any commodity price contracts outstanding.



LETTER TO THE SHAREHOLDERS Welcome to the first shareholders report for 2016. The first quarter has been extremely difficult for our industry as the price for WTI dropped toward $25.00 US/bbl in January and averaged only $34.00 US/bbl for the quarter. With this significant deterioration in prices, we reduced our capital spending to only essential projects to preserve the integrity of our assets. The Company elected to have the production rates from our assets fall, and not complete the workovers that would normally maintain production levels. This preserved cash, preserved reserves, and allowed for the acceleration of pressure support at the Laporte EOR project. As we announced on December 15, 2015 we decided to explore strategic alternatives for the purpose of preserving and enhancing shareholder value. That process is ongoing; however, it is the Company's intention not to disclose developments with respect to the strategic review process until the Board of Directors has approved a specific transaction or otherwise determines that disclosure is necessary or appropriate. Sincerely, and on behalf of the Board of Directors: Allen J. Bey, President and Chief Executive Officer REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS During the first quarter of 2016 Rock focused on maintaining its balance sheet and capital spending was limited to essential activities to preserve the value of the asset base. The quarter was highlighted by the following specific accomplishments:

Drilled 1 (1.0 net) oil well with 100% casing success at Mantario infill;
Averaged 2,893 boe per day (96% crude oil and liquids);
Total net capital expenditures of $0.8 million;
Generated funds from operations for the quarter of $2.1 million ($0.04/ basic share); and
Negotiated banking agreements with our existing senior lender, and a new subordinated lender for a total combined facility of $60 million.

Rock's realized price in the first quarter of 2016 was $19.33 per boe compared to $35.13 per boe in the fourth quarter of 2015 and $37.65 for the same period a year ago. The decrease in price realization is primarily attributed to a significant decrease in WTI pricing as it fell to $34.00 US/bbl during the quarter from $42.18 in the fourth quarter of 2015 and $48.63 US/bbl a year ago. This drop in WTI prices was partially offset by a reduction in the US/CAD exchange rate. Operating costs increased during the quarter to $17.42 per boe compared to $16.32 per boe in the fourth quarter of 2015. Rock generated an operating netback of $1.01 per boe in the first quarter of 2016 compared to $17.63 per boe in the fourth quarter of 2015, as operating netbacks were negatively impacted by reduced product pricing. Though operating costs were higher on a per boe produced basis in the quarter, royalties were slightly lower at $1.08/boe compared to $1.18/boe in the fourth quarter of 2015. Total net capital expenditures for the first quarter of 2016 were $0.8 million, including $0.8 million for the drilling program and facilities, $0.5 million for land and capitalized G&A, offset by a $0.5 million of AFE accrual reversals from expenditures completed in 2015. Rock's daily production for the first quarter of 2015 averaged 2,893 boed (96% oil and liquids) including approximately 540 boed from the Onward Viking pool and approximately 1,800 boed from the Mantario/Laporte pool. Mantario/Laporte Saskatchewan During the first quarter of 2016 Rock drilled and completed one oil well at Mantario/Laporte as well as completed and equipped two oil wells (that were drilled in 2015). The Company also completed one additional polymer injector conversion. Rock elected to delay workovers to repair pump failures, during the first quarter due to low oil prices. In addition workover operations were adversely affected by break up (road bans). Due to these reasons production levels from the pool fell below 1,500 boepd during the months of March and April. Since that time, Rock has been able to move on to the shut in wells and begin to restore production. Production from the pool is currently averaging approximately 1,700 - 1,800 boed, and the Company expects production to stabilize in the 1,800 - 2,000 boed range in the next few months as the remaining repairs are completed. Though production from the pool was adversely affected in recent months due to the lack of maintenance spending, it has allowed the Company to increase its reservoir voidage replacement and re-pressurize the pool. Moving forward the pool will require the drilling of 4-6 in-fill wells over the next year to maintain and build the production levels. The Company was successful in the April 8, 2016 land sale in acquiring an additional two sections of land directly to the west of our main pool. This has added an additional exploration target along the same trend as the main Laporte pool. Onward, Saskatchewan Viking During the first quarter, Rock elected to allow 8.7 sections of freehold land to expire as these lands were not economic to develop at forecast prices for the foreseeable future. Rock continues to have over 35 net sections of land in this area that management believes are prospective for economic oil production. If fully developed at 16 wells per section, this play could generate over 500 drilling locations and 16 million boe of recoverable reserves. Production from the Viking is expected to average 450 boed during the second quarter of 2016. Outlook and 2016 Guidance Given the current level of crude oil prices, Rock reduced its capital budget for 2016 from the previously announced level of $20 million (November 12, 2015) to a "cash flow" budget. The Company will monitor cash flow on a monthly basis to ensure discretionary capital spending does not increase existing net debt levels. On December 15, 2015 Rock announced that it had initiated a full public process to identify and examine strategic alternatives for the purpose of preserving and enhancing shareholder value. Such strategic alternatives may include, but are not limited to, a corporate sale, merger or other business combination, the sale of all or a material portion of Rock's assets, a reorganization, recapitalization or restructuring of Rock or any combination of the foregoing. It is the Company's intention not to disclose developments with respect to the strategic review process until the board of directors has approved a specific transaction or otherwise determines that disclosure is necessary or appropriate. Rock cautions that there are no assurances or guarantees that the process will result in a transaction and that, if a transaction is undertaken, no assurances or guarantees may be given with respect to the type, terms or timing of such a transaction. In addition, the results of this process may impact the ability of the Company to continue to successfully manage its credit facility agreements and its ability to continue future operations. Additional equity, debt arrangements and/or operating developments may be needed to meet the Company's business objectives. There are no guarantees that such additional capital funding will be available when needed. For further information please visit Rock's website at www.rockenergy.ca. Conversion Measures Production volumes and reserves are commonly expressed on a barrel of oil equivalent ("boe") basis. All conversions in this report are derived by converting natural gas to crude oil in the ratio of six thousand cubic feet ("mcf") of natural gas to one barrel ("bbl") of crude oil. Certain financial values are presented on a boe basis and such measurements may not be consistent with those used by other companies. Boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio of six mcf to one boe is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead. Non-GAAP Measures This document, including the accompanying financial statements also contain the terms "operating netback" and "total net capital expenditures" which do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures for other entities and should not be considered an alternative to or more meaningful than the prescribed GAAP measure. Management believes these measures are helpful supplementary measures of financial performance and provide users with information that is commonly used by other oil and gas companies. Operating netback has been calculated as oil and natural gas revenues, less royalties and production and operating expenses. Management believes this is a measure of operational profitability before administrative and other financing costs. Cash netbacks are calculated as operating netbacks less general and administrative expenses before share based compensation, and interest financing costs. Readers are cautioned that these measures should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, "net loss and comprehensive loss" as determined in accordance with GAAP as a measure of the Company's performance. Total net capital expenditures has been calculated to include the cash impacts of capital expenditures and property dispositions, as well as non-cash capital adjustments related to the Company's decommissioning liability and share based compensation costs. Management believes that this provides supplemental information on the total capital spending for the period. Key Financial Metric Definitions Funds from operations This document, including the accompanying financial statements, contain the term "funds from operations" as a measure of the Company's performance. Funds from operations or funds from operations per share may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures for other entities. Funds from operations as used in this report represent cash from operating activities before changes in non-cash working capital and decommissioning expenditures. See "Funds from operations" section for details of this calculation. Management believes that funds from operations represent both an indicator of the Company's performance and a funding source for ongoing operations. Other Metrics This document, including the accompanying financial statements also contain the terms "adjusted working capital deficiency" and "net debt" which may not be comparable with the calculation of similar measures for other entities. Working capital is defined as the difference between current assets and current liabilities. Working capital (deficiency) is the term used when the difference between current assets and current liabilities is a negative number which is quite common in the oil and gas industry. Adjusted working capital, and adjusted working capital deficiency have been calculated excluding the unrealized gains on commodity price contracts from current assets and the unrealized losses on commodity price contracts and bank debt from current liabilities. Adjusted working capital and adjusted working capital (deficiency) represent operating liquidity available to the business and are included in the definition of "net debt". Net debt has been calculated as bank debt plus adjusted working capital or adjusted working capital (deficiency). Net debt is used to calculate the debt-to-annualized-funds from operations ratio. Management believes these measures are useful supplementary measures of the total amount of current and long-term debt. Total capitalization is calculated as net debt plus shareholders' equity. Management believes this measure is a useful supplementary measure of the Company's managed capital. Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements and information contained in this document, including but not limited to management's assessment of Rock's plans and future operations, production, reserves, revenue, commodity prices, operating and administrative expenditures, interest expense, future income taxes, drilling plans, acquisitions and dispositions, funds from operations, capital expenditure programs and debt levels, contain forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. These statements, by their nature, are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond Rock's control including the effect of general economic conditions, industry conditions, regulatory and taxation regimes, volatility of commodity prices, currency fluctuations, the availability of services, imprecision of reserve estimates, geological, technical, drilling and processing problems, environmental risks, weather, the lack of availability of qualified personnel or management, stock market volatility, the ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external sources and competition from other industry participants for, among other things, capital, services, acquisitions of reserves, undeveloped lands and skilled personnel, any of which may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements, although considered reasonable by management at the time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect and actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in the statements made and, therefore, should not unduly be relied on. These statements speak only as of the date of this document. Rock does not intend and does not assume any obligation to update these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. Abbreviations The terms "2016" and "2015" are used throughout this document and refer to the three months ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, respectively, and the term "prior" or "previous" year refers to 2015. The terms "first quarter of 2016" and "same period of 2015" or similar terms are used throughout this document and refer to the three-month periods ended March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015, respectively.


bbl
barrel(s)

mbbls
thousand barrels


bbl/d
barrel(s) per day

mboe
thousand barrels of oil equivalent


bcf
billion cubic feet

mboed
thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day


boe
barrels of oil equivalent

mcf
thousand cubic feet


boed
barrels of oil equivalent per day

mmcf
million cubic feet


bps
basis points

mmbbls
million barrels


CDOR
Certificate of Deposit Offered Rate

mmboe
million barrels of oil equivalent


GJ
gigajoule

NGL
natural gas liquids


hectare
1 hectare is equal to 2.47 acres

WTI
West Texas Intermediate


km
kilometer

WCS
Western Canadian Select









Rock Energy Inc.
Allen J. Bey
President and Chief Executive Officer
403.218.4380
Rock Energy Inc.
Todd Hirtle
Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
403.218.4380
www.rockenergy.ca




Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 9.86
RE's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
80% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 13.23 vs. RE: 9.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
RE' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.47  Med: 8.12 Max: 678.57
Current: 9.86
5.47
678.57
Forward PE Ratio 12.03
RE's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 11.09 vs. RE: 12.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 9.86
RE's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
79% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 12.88 vs. RE: 9.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
RE' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.47  Med: 8.12 Max: 678.57
Current: 9.86
5.47
678.57
PB Ratio 1.18
RE's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
54% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. RE: 1.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
RE' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.65  Med: 0.99 Max: 1.41
Current: 1.18
0.65
1.41
PS Ratio 1.69
RE's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
55% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 1.40 vs. RE: 1.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
RE' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.89  Med: 1.31 Max: 1.7
Current: 1.69
0.89
1.7
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 7.13
RE's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
75% of the 44 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 12.68 vs. RE: 7.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
RE' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.17  Med: 6.63 Max: 12.45
Current: 7.13
4.17
12.45
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 7.13
RE's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
69% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 11.27 vs. RE: 7.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
RE' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.17  Med: 6.63 Max: 12.45
Current: 7.13
4.17
12.45
EV-to-EBIT 9.23
RE's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
51% of the 104 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 7.96 vs. RE: 9.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
RE' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -903  Med: 5.5 Max: 96.7
Current: 9.23
-903
96.7
EV-to-EBITDA 9.23
RE's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
59% of the 104 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 7.71 vs. RE: 9.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
RE' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1016.7  Med: 5.4 Max: 93
Current: 9.23
-1016.7
93
Shiller PE Ratio 14.88
RE's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 20 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 14.99 vs. RE: 14.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
RE' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.93  Med: 13.37 Max: 21.55
Current: 14.88
9.93
21.55

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 2.05
RE's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
83% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 8.02 vs. RE: 2.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
RE' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46  Med: 2.05 Max: 3.16
Current: 2.05
0.46
3.16
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.20
RE's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
75% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 0.36 vs. RE: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
RE' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 0.15 Max: 0.2
Current: 0.2
0.09
0.2
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 29.00
RE's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
86% of the 35 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 9.10 vs. RE: 29.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
RE' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 14.5 Max: 88.2
Current: 29
0
88.2
Forward Dividend Yield % 2.14
RE's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
79% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 4.29 vs. RE: 2.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 5.58
RE's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
61% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 4.88 vs. RE: 5.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
RE' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.26  Med: 5.61 Max: 8.65
Current: 5.58
1.26
8.65
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 4.90
RE's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
90% of the 39 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: -0.10 vs. RE: 4.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
RE' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.6  Med: 2.7 Max: 6
Current: 4.9
-8.6
6

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.18
RE's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
52% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. RE: 1.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
RE' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 1.11 Max: 2.08
Current: 1.18
0.73
2.08
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.52
RE's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
68% of the 31 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 0.62 vs. RE: 0.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
RE' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.43 Max: 0.62
Current: 0.52
0.34
0.62
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.29
RE's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
71% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 1.06 vs. RE: 1.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
RE' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.32  Med: 0.96 Max: 1.4
Current: 1.29
0.32
1.4
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.72
RE's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
72% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 0.87 vs. RE: 0.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
RE' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 0.66 Max: 1.69
Current: 0.72
0.49
1.69
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 10.83
RE's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
51% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 12.27 vs. RE: 10.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
RE' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 17.85 Max: 28.8
Current: 10.83
1
28.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 26.90
RE's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
61% of the 33 Companies
in the Global Insurance - Reinsurance industry.

( Industry Median: 17.53 vs. RE: 26.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
RE' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17  Med: 17 Max: 26.9
Current: 26.9
17
26.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $5,794
EPS (TTM) $ 23.71
Beta0.55
Short Percentage of Float2.47%
52-Week Range $169.19 - 240.51
Shares Outstanding (Mil)46.05

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 6,097 6,342 6,614
EPS ($) 19.43 19.90 20.10
EPS without NRI ($) 19.43 19.90 20.10
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 4.88 5.10 5.61
» More Articles for RE

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Stocks Richard Pzena Has Bought for 2 Quarters Jun 16 2016 
Mason Hawkins Sells More Than 93% of Aon Holdings May 16 2016 
Rock Energy Inc. Reports Q1 2016 Results May 11 2016 
Mason Hawkins Trims Position in Everest Re Group Mar 21 2016 
Rock Energy Inc. and FrontFour Capital Group LLC Announce Change of Date of Shareholders Meeting Mar 11 2016 
Rock Energy Inc. Provides Update on Credit Facilities Jan 27 2016 
Rock Energy Inc. and FrontFour Capital Group LLC Announce Change of Date of Shareholders Meeting Jan 22 2016 
Rock Energy Inc. Announces Review of Strategic Alternatives Dec 15 2015 
Rock Energy Inc. Announces Terms of New Credit Facilities Dec 10 2015 
Rock Energy Inc. Calls Special Meeting of Shareholders Dec 10 2015 

More From Other Websites
P&C Insurance Stocks' Q1 Earnings on Apr 24: RE and WRB Apr 21 2017
Should You Sell Everest Re Group (RE) Before Earnings? Apr 20 2017
What's in Store for Torchmark (TMK) this Earnings Season? Apr 17 2017
Everest Re Group Ltd. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : RE-US : April 14,... Apr 14 2017
Everest Re Group (RE) on Growth Track: Should You Hold? Apr 13 2017
Everest Insurance® Launches Life Sciences Practice Apr 07 2017
Zacks.com featured highlights: Conagra Brands, Broadcom, AMC Networks, Everest Re Group and CBRE... Apr 06 2017
Markets Get Edgy Ahead of Key Events: 5 Top ROE Picks Apr 05 2017
Everest Re Group Ltd. : RE-US: Dividend Analysis : March 08th, 2017 (record date) : By the numbers :... Apr 03 2017
E&P stocks to buy and sell: Analyst Mar 31 2017
Why You Should Hold onto Brown & Brown (BRO) Stock Right Now Mar 29 2017
Why You Should You Retain Chubb (CB) Stock in Your Portfolio Mar 29 2017
Top Ranked Value Stocks to Buy for March 29th Mar 29 2017
Everest Insurance® Launches Upper Middle Market Casualty Offering Within the Risk Management Group Mar 28 2017
Everest Re Group Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Release Date Mar 27 2017
AIG in Rough Waters: What's Dragging the Stock Down? Mar 23 2017
Top Ranked Value Stocks to Buy for March 23rd Mar 23 2017
Everest Re Group's (RE) Prospects Look Bright: Time to Buy? Mar 10 2017
AIG's Peter Hancock Resigns Amid Dwindling Support Mar 10 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)