Switch to:
Also traded in: Canada, Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.20
RGLD's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
80% of the 1409 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 8.10 vs. RGLD: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
RGLD' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 10000.00 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.2
Equity to Asset 0.72
RGLD's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
70% of the 760 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 0.59 vs. RGLD: 0.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
RGLD' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 0.89 Max: 0.97
Current: 0.72
0.66
0.97
Interest Coverage 0.12
RGLD's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
99% of the 699 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. RGLD: 0.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
RGLD' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.4  Med: 14.90 Max: 81.28
Current: 0.12
3.4
81.28
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 2.67
M-Score: -2.83
WACC vs ROIC
5.67%
-3.71%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 1.14
RGLD's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
56% of the 771 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -0.59 vs. RGLD: 1.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
RGLD' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 30.05  Med: 49.52 Max: 59.64
Current: 1.14
30.05
59.64
Net-margin (%) -24.40
RGLD's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 772 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -2.13 vs. RGLD: -24.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
RGLD' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.74  Med: 34.07 Max: 51.98
Current: -24.4
15.74
51.98
ROE (%) -3.59
RGLD's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
63% of the 1300 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -10.19 vs. RGLD: -3.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
RGLD' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2  Med: 5.15 Max: 8.96
Current: -3.59
2
8.96
ROA (%) -2.69
RGLD's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
66% of the 1430 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -8.63 vs. RGLD: -2.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
RGLD' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.61  Med: 4.06 Max: 8.28
Current: -2.69
1.61
8.28
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 0.29
RGLD's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 1378 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -11.79 vs. RGLD: 0.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
RGLD' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.12  Med: 8.32 Max: 24.29
Current: 0.29
4.12
24.29
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -2.30
RGLD's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
54% of the 632 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -3.60 vs. RGLD: -2.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
RGLD' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -38.5  Med: 18.90 Max: 127
Current: -2.3
-38.5
127
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -12.10
RGLD's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
55% of the 978 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -16.30 vs. RGLD: -12.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
RGLD' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -40.7  Med: 20.20 Max: 142.9
Current: -12.1
-40.7
142.9
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -20.80
RGLD's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
53% of the 884 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -18.90 vs. RGLD: -20.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
RGLD' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.8  Med: 14.05 Max: 87.2
Current: -20.8
-20.8
87.2
» RGLD's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-08-06)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

RGLD Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Julian Robertson 77,500 sh (New)
Jim Simons 22,209 sh (+573.00%)
First Eagle Investment 2,938,561 sh (+179.83%)
Murray Stahl 732,122 sh (+19.62%)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Ray Dalio 70,800 sh (-1.12%)
Mario Gabelli 22,380 sh (-1.76%)
Chuck Royce 19,900 sh (-9.95%)
» More
Q3 2015

RGLD Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Joel Greenblatt 18,453 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 18,043 sh (New)
Jim Simons 302,571 sh (+1262.38%)
First Eagle Investment 4,222,664 sh (+43.70%)
Ray Dalio 86,300 sh (+21.89%)
Julian Robertson 77,500 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 19,900 sh (unchged)
Murray Stahl 715,991 sh (-2.20%)
Mario Gabelli 16,730 sh (-25.25%)
» More
Q4 2015

RGLD Guru Trades in Q4 2015

RS Investment Management 126,730 sh (New)
Jim Simons 330,200 sh (+9.13%)
Mario Gabelli 17,430 sh (+4.18%)
First Eagle Investment 4,246,460 sh (+0.56%)
Chuck Royce 19,900 sh (unchged)
Julian Robertson Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Ray Dalio 73,600 sh (-14.72%)
Murray Stahl 472,800 sh (-33.97%)
» More
Q1 2016

RGLD Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 13,716 sh (New)
John Hussman 25,000 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 39,900 sh (+100.50%)
Murray Stahl 476,724 sh (+0.83%)
Mario Gabelli 17,430 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones 26,500 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
First Eagle Investment 4,233,693 sh (-0.30%)
Ray Dalio 55,500 sh (-24.59%)
RS Investment Management 320 sh (-99.75%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with RGLD

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Metals & Mining » Gold
Compare:OTCPK:OPYGY, TSX:ABX, NYSE:NEM, TSX:G, TSX:FNV, ASX:NCM » details
Traded in other countries:RGL.Canada, RG3.Germany,
Royal Gold Inc together with its subsidiaries is engaged in acquiring and managing precious metals royalties, precious metals streams and similar interests.

Royal Gold Inc was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on January 5, 1981. The Company together with its subsidiaries is engaged in the business of acquiring and managing precious metals royalties and similar interests. It is engaged in a continual review of opportunities to acquire existing royalties, to create new royalties through the financing of mine development or exploration, or to acquire companies that hold royalties. The Company uses evaluation stage to describe exploration stage properties that contain mineralized material and on which operators are engaged in the search for reserves. It competes with other royalty and streaming companies, mine operators, and financial buyers in efforts to acquire existing royalty interests, and with the lenders and investors providing financing to operators of mineral properties. The Company's business is subject to the environmental laws and regulations promulgated by federal, state and local governments.

Guru Investment Theses on Royal Gold Inc

Meridian Funds Comments on Royal Gold Inc. - Mar 08, 2016

Royal Gold, Inc. (NASDAQ:RGLD) is a precious metals company with royalty claims on gold, silver, copper, lead, and zinc at mines in over 20 countries. While gold performed better than other commodities during the period, the precious metal declined as U.S. monetary policy tightened and the dollar appreciated. Another setback for the company was the deferral of gold from a mine in Chile operated by Barrick Gold, which temporarily stopped construction at the mine. However, we believe Royal Gold has an exceptional business model and we view our investment in the company as a great way to get exposure to gold. The company essentially pays miners upfront for the right to buy their metals later at reduced prices. It has no operational risk because it owns no mines, is a beneficiary of ounces growth, has pricing power, and typically earns an 8% return on a flat price. We have decided to be patient with Royal Gold and maintained a position in the stock.





From the Meridian Equity Income Fund fourth quarter commentary.



Check out Meridian Funds latest stock trades

Murray Stahl’s Horizon Kinetics Comments on Royal Gold Inc - Dec 22, 2014

An idiosyncratic security with benefits – a diversifier

Let’s find a contrasting investment to a utility index or a REIT index, which are front and center as bond substitutes or asset allocation building blocks. They are therefore closely governed in valuation and price behavior by the asset flows of index investors and, so, might be particularly vulnerable to a rise in interest rates. Consider, instead, a very distinctive security like Royal Gold, Inc (RGLD). It is categorized in financial securities databases like a gold mining company. Yet it does not do any mining, and on a balance sheet and income statement basis has as little in common with gold mining as Microsoft (MSFT): it has virtually no property, plant, or equipment, it carries no net debt, it has extremely high after-tax cash flow margins—well over 50%. Microsoft’s are roughly 25%. Its financial statements and casually observable economics say that it really does not belong with the gold mining group.

Royal Gold is one of several publicly traded precious metals royalty companies. They solve a unique problem of miners, which must find a way to fund the massive capital costs of developing a new mine yet cannot afford the risk of taking on too much debt, since such a project might not be productive for many years, during which time input and output costs can drastically alter the anticipated profitability. The standard alternative, issuing more shares, is often too dilutive. The royalty companies extend cash to a miner in exchange for a percentage of the production. The royalty company is not directly exposed to the operating costs or liabilities of the miner and earns its revenues even if the miner produces at only a breakeven level of profitability.

However, the royalty business is far better than merely that. When Royal Gold purchases a revenue interest, it might be for the life of the mine, which could exceed 20 years. But the purchase price is calculated as the present value of the future estimated revenues, based on the current gold price. As an example, if the interest rate used to calculate that present value is 10%, and if the mine will start production next year, then the price paid for the first year’s production will be 10% less than the gold price. So, if today’s gold price is $1,300 per ounce, Royal Gold will pay only $1,170 for next year’s gold production. But the 2nd year’s production will cost 10% less than that, or $1,050. The 20th year’s gold price for Royal Gold would be only 15% of today’s price, or $193. In total, Royal Gold would advance $11,068 for what will be $26,000 of gold production ($1,300/year x 20 years).

There are other aspects to such a contract that provide additional financial benefits. But staying with this information for the moment, one can say that Royal Gold has the safety of paying drastically less than the current price of gold for its future production. There is a great deal of protection from downward volatility in gold prices in that contract. Additionally, the royalty percentage is often of the sliding variety: it might start at 1% of mine output, but with scheduled increases as the gold price rises above certain levels, up to 5% or more. Accordingly, there is positive operating leverage for Royal Gold in the event that gold prices rise.

Viewed this way, Royal Gold is better described as a merchant bank than a gold mining company. In a sense, it has as much in common with the activity of gold mining as JP Morgan Chase (JPM) has with an automobile manufacturer merely because the bank might have lent money to the car company. In actuality, the comparison with JP Morgan Chase is a poor one, since banks operate with extreme debt leverage, and Royal Gold operates with none. A further differentiation of Royal Gold’s business model from that of wither Microsoft or JP Morgan Chase: While Royal Gold has a $4 billion stock market capitalization, how many employees do you think it has? The answer is 20. For what it’s worth, the company states that none of them are subject to a labor contract or a collective bargaining agreement.



In a portfolio context, Royal Gold has long-term growth characteristics, because it does add new contracts to its portfolio of interests, and its earnings are positively associated with whatever economic conditions might lead to higher gold prices, one of which is inflation or the anticipation of inflation or geopolitical risk. Yet, because of its contract structure, it is remarkably well-insulated from price declines in that commodity. Accordingly, its profitability is not closely tied to the factors that impact the typical industrial or financial company and it should be a diversifying element in a portfolio. Its remarkably low correlation with the S&P 500 over the past half-dozen years, at 0.1334, is the statistical evidence. The visual evidence, from the pre-crisis date of mid-2008, is shown in the accompanying chart of Royal Gold relative to both a gold mining company index (Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF, GDX) and the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD), which holds gold bullion.

Both Royal Gold and Silver Wheaton, which acquires primarily silver royalty interests and manifests somewhat different price patterns, are new holdings in the Core Value strategy. These follow, as mentioned in last quarter’s Commentary, additional investments in land companies such as Tri Pointe Homes and Brookfield Residential Properties. They also exhibit the characteristic of trading at prices well below the long-term realizations they should draw from their asset portfolios. They are, in practice, idiosyncratic securities that, much more than the large-cap companies that comprise the asset allocation index and ETF building blocks, will exhibit stock prices tied to their own financial development rather than to the public flow of funds. A portfolio comprised of such companies will be a more effectively diversified investment.

From Murray Stahl (Trades, Portfolio)’s Horizon Kinetics 3Q 2014 Commentary.

Check out Murray Stahl latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Royal Gold Inc

Meridian Funds Comments on Royal Gold Inc. Guru stock highlight
Royal Gold, Inc. (NASDAQ:RGLD) is a precious metals company with royalty claims on gold, silver, copper, lead, and zinc at mines in over 20 countries. While gold performed better than other commodities during the period, the precious metal declined as U.S. monetary policy tightened and the dollar appreciated. Another setback for the company was the deferral of gold from a mine in Chile operated by Barrick Gold, which temporarily stopped construction at the mine. However, we believe Royal Gold has an exceptional business model and we view our investment in the company as a great way to get exposure to gold. The company essentially pays miners upfront for the right to buy their metals later at reduced prices. It has no operational risk because it owns no mines, is a beneficiary of ounces growth, has pricing power, and typically earns an 8% return on a flat price. We have decided to be patient with Royal Gold and maintained a position in the stock. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 29.94
RGLD's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
74% of the 195 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 15.27 vs. RGLD: 29.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 1.61
RGLD's P/B is ranked higher than
50% of the 1342 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 1.64 vs. RGLD: 1.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
RGLD' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.75  Med: 2.23 Max: 5.93
Current: 1.61
0.75
5.93
P/S 10.70
RGLD's P/S is ranked lower than
87% of the 724 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 1.43 vs. RGLD: 10.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
RGLD' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.38  Med: 16.32 Max: 30.74
Current: 10.7
5.38
30.74
POCF 22.09
RGLD's POCF is ranked lower than
85% of the 426 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 7.60 vs. RGLD: 22.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
RGLD' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.48  Med: 27.83 Max: 84.35
Current: 22.09
10.48
84.35
EV-to-EBIT 554.58
RGLD's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
98% of the 440 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 14.83 vs. RGLD: 554.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
RGLD' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.3  Med: 29.10 Max: 613.1
Current: 554.58
14.3
613.1
EV-to-EBITDA 30.12
RGLD's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
79% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 9.80 vs. RGLD: 30.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
RGLD' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.4  Med: 19.40 Max: 40
Current: 30.12
9.4
40
Shiller P/E 69.36
RGLD's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
81% of the 180 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 18.56 vs. RGLD: 69.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
RGLD' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 29.05  Med: 80.85 Max: 142.08
Current: 69.36
29.05
142.08
Current Ratio 7.24
RGLD's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 1361 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 1.79 vs. RGLD: 7.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
RGLD' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.17  Med: 14.97 Max: 62.19
Current: 7.24
2.17
62.19
Quick Ratio 7.02
RGLD's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 1361 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 1.38 vs. RGLD: 7.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
RGLD' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.17  Med: 14.28 Max: 62.19
Current: 7.02
2.17
62.19
Days Inventory 15.01
RGLD's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
92% of the 642 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 73.33 vs. RGLD: 15.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
RGLD' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 0
Current: 15.01
Days Sales Outstanding 44.99
RGLD's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
58% of the 628 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 33.93 vs. RGLD: 44.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
RGLD' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 57.9  Med: 92.15 Max: 117.05
Current: 44.99
57.9
117.05
Days Payable 18.71
RGLD's Days Payable is ranked lower than
79% of the 518 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 44.62 vs. RGLD: 18.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
RGLD' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 46.08  Med: 100.99 Max: 219.66
Current: 18.71
46.08
219.66

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 1.61
RGLD's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
66% of the 622 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 2.45 vs. RGLD: 1.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
RGLD' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.52  Med: 0.80 Max: 3.37
Current: 1.61
0.52
3.37
Dividend Growth (3y) 15.80
RGLD's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
79% of the 244 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -20.60 vs. RGLD: 15.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
RGLD' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 15.80 Max: 35.8
Current: 15.8
0
35.8
Forward Dividend Yield 1.64
RGLD's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
66% of the 534 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 2.62 vs. RGLD: 1.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 4.32
RGLD's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
63% of the 810 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 3.03 vs. RGLD: 4.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
RGLD' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.39  Med: 2.14 Max: 9.03
Current: 4.32
1.39
9.03
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -3.10
RGLD's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
73% of the 970 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -9.80 vs. RGLD: -3.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
RGLD' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23  Med: -5.30 Max: -1.8
Current: -3.1
-23
-1.8

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 1.64
RGLD's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
53% of the 1304 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 1.75 vs. RGLD: 1.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
RGLD' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.03  Med: 3.55 Max: 14.99
Current: 1.64
1.03
14.99
Price/Median PS Value 0.66
RGLD's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
69% of the 637 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. RGLD: 0.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
RGLD' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.32  Med: 1.00 Max: 80
Current: 0.66
0.32
80
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 0.20
RGLD's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 1494 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -5.44 vs. RGLD: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
RGLD' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 3.40 Max: 7
Current: 0.2
0.2
7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -14.25
RGLD's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 290 Companies
in the Global Gold industry.

( Industry Median: -2.27 vs. RGLD: -14.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
RGLD' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.1  Med: 23.90 Max: 50.6
Current: -14.25
-21.1
50.6

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $339.2
EPS (TTM) $ -1.27
Beta0.50
Short Percentage of Float6.24%
52-Week Range $24.68 - 65.79
Shares Outstanding (Mil)65.27

Analyst Estimate

Jun16 Jun17 Jun18
Revenue (Mil $) 532 647 755
EPS ($) 1.68 2.46 3.11
EPS without NRI ($) 1.68 2.46 3.11
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
28.00%
» More Articles for RGLD

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Preston Corp.: An Alternative Exposure to Booming Gold May 10 2016 
Meridian Funds Comments on Royal Gold Inc. Mar 08 2016 
First Eagle Investment Increases Flowserve Holding by 14% Feb 08 2016 
With U.S. Equities Remaining Bullish, How Do You Invest in Gold? Dec 01 2015 
Murray Stahl Focuses on Existing Stakes in Second Quarter Sep 09 2015 
4 Top Gold Stocks to Watch Mar 06 2015 
Gold Rush Jan 21 2015 
Murray Stahl’s Horizon Kinetics Comments on Royal Gold Inc Dec 22 2014 
Murray Stahl’s Horizon Kinetics 3Q 2014 Commentary Dec 22 2014 
Precious Metal Royalty & Streaming Companies: A Qualitative Analysis Mar 31 2014 

More From Other Websites
Precious Metal Miners Slide alongside Precious Metals May 26 2016
Royal Gold Announces Third Quarter Dividend May 24 2016
Royal Gold Announces Third Quarter Dividend May 24 2016
Royal Gold, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : RGLD-US : May 19, 2016 May 19 2016
Gold and Silver Shining Once Again May 10 2016
Miners Rose on May 6, Following Precious Metals on Weak Data May 09 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Royal Gold, Inc. : May 4, 2016 May 04 2016
ROYAL GOLD INC Financials May 03 2016
Royal Gold, Inc. :RGLD-US: Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2016 By the Numbers May 03 2016
Miners Maintain Their Upward Trends: Could There Be a Pullback? May 02 2016
Edited Transcript of RGLD earnings conference call or presentation 28-Apr-16 4:00pm GMT Apr 28 2016
Q3 2016 Royal Gold Inc Earnings Release - Before Market Open Apr 28 2016
ROYAL GOLD INC Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Regulation FD... Apr 28 2016
ROYAL GOLD INC Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Apr 28 2016
Royal Gold reports 3Q loss Apr 27 2016
Royal Gold reports 3Q loss Apr 27 2016
Royal Gold Announces 21% Increase in Attributable Reserves Apr 27 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)