Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt No Debt
NYSE:SBR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
98% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.27 vs. NYSE:SBR: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:SBR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: N/A  Med: N/A Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
N/A
No Debt
Equity-to-Asset 0.85
NYSE:SBR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
93% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. NYSE:SBR: 0.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:SBR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 0.92 Max: 0.98
Current: 0.85
0.66
0.98
Interest Coverage No Debt
NYSE:SBR's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
97% of the 31 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.75 vs. NYSE:SBR: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:SBR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: No Debt  Med: No Debt Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 408.00
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 91.49
NYSE:SBR's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
97% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -10.15 vs. NYSE:SBR: 91.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:SBR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 91.49  Med: 96.06 Max: 97.62
Current: 91.49
91.49
97.62
Net Margin % 91.49
NYSE:SBR's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
97% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -17.51 vs. NYSE:SBR: 91.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:SBR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 91.49  Med: 96.15 Max: 97.62
Current: 91.49
91.49
97.62
ROE % 655.06
NYSE:SBR's ROE % is ranked higher than
98% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -7.80 vs. NYSE:SBR: 655.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:SBR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 572.24  Med: 1060.05 Max: 1417.57
Current: 655.06
572.24
1417.57
ROA % 517.46
NYSE:SBR's ROA % is ranked higher than
98% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -4.80 vs. NYSE:SBR: 517.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:SBR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 484.29  Med: 930.22 Max: 1295.43
Current: 517.46
484.29
1295.43
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 9481.02
NYSE:SBR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
98% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -5.56 vs. NYSE:SBR: 9481.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:SBR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 744.14  Med: 9441.92 Max: 15484.96
Current: 9481.02
744.14
15484.96
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -20.90
NYSE:SBR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
57% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -17.90 vs. NYSE:SBR: -20.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:SBR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.9  Med: 2 Max: 24.8
Current: -20.9
-20.9
24.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -22.30
NYSE:SBR's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
64% of the 47 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -12.30 vs. NYSE:SBR: -22.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:SBR' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 10.1
Current: -22.3
0
10.1
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -22.40
NYSE:SBR's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
80% of the 30 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -8.40 vs. NYSE:SBR: -22.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:SBR' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -22.4  Med: 2.6 Max: 25.6
Current: -22.4
-22.4
25.6
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Sabine Royalty Trust $NYSE:SBR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:SBR's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

SBR Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Murray Stahl 44,992 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 59,548 sh (+108.59%)
» More
Q2 2016

SBR Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 7,657 sh (New)
Murray Stahl 50,022 sh (+11.18%)
Chuck Royce 59,548 sh (unchged)
» More
Q3 2016

SBR Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 21,257 sh (+177.62%)
Chuck Royce 59,548 sh (unchged)
Murray Stahl 48,542 sh (-2.96%)
» More
Q4 2016

SBR Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 36,761 sh (+72.94%)
Chuck Royce 59,548 sh (unchged)
Murray Stahl 48,250 sh (-0.60%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with SBR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Drilling » Oil & Gas Drilling    NAICS: 533110    SIC: 6792
Compare:OTCPK:TDGCF, OTCPK:GFKSY, NYSE:SDLP, NYSE:PES, NYSE:ATW, NYSE:SDRL, OTCPK:ARHVF, NYSE:ICD, OTCPK:FOEAY, OTCPK:PHXHF, OTCPK:ESVIF, OTCPK:WEEEF, OTCPK:AWLCF, NYSE:PACD, OTCPK:STGAF, OTCPK:CETEF, NAS:ORIG, OTCPK:GULTU, OTCPK:NATDF, AMEX:CEI » details
Headquarter Location:USA
Sabine Royalty Trust is an express trust, which receives a distribution of royalty and mineral interests from certain producing and proved undeveloped oil and gas properties located in Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas.

Sabine Royalty Trust is an express trust formed under the laws of the State of Texas by the Sabine Corporation Royalty Trust Agreement made and entered into effective as of December 31, 1982, between Sabine Corporation (Sabine), as trustor, and InterFirst Bank Dallas, N.A., as trustee. The current trustee of the Trust is Bank of America, N.A. On November 12, 1982, the shareholders of Sabine Corporation approved and authorized its transfer of royalty and mineral interests, including landowner's royalties, overriding royalty interests, minerals, production payments and any other similar, non-participatory interests, in certain producing and proved undeveloped oil and gas properties located in Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas to the Trust. Through a series of mergers, Sabine was merged into Pacific Enterprises Oil Company (USA), a California corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Pacific Enterprises, effective January 1, 1990. Pacific (USA), as successor to Sabine, has assumed by operation of law all of Sabine's rights and obligations with respect to the Trust. In January 1993, Pacific (USA) completed the sale of substantially all its producing oil and gas assets to a third party. The wells on the properties conveyed to the Trust are operated by many companies including large, established companies such as BP Amoco, Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Exxon Mobil. The Royalty Properties are the only assets of the Trust, other than cash being held for the payment of expenses and liabilities and for distribution to the Unit holders. Pending such payment of expenses and distribution to Unit holders, cash might be invested by the Trustee only in certificates of deposit, United States government securities or repurchase agreements secured by United States government securities. Activities on the Royalty Properties are subject to existing federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations governing health, safety, environmental quality and pollution control.

Top Ranked Articles about Sabine Royalty Trust

Silver Bear Files Technical Report on the Mangazeisky Silver Project Feasibility Study

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - Jul 5, 2016) - Silver Bear Resources Inc. ("Silver Bear" or the "Company") (TSX:SBR) is pleased to announce it has filed the National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101") Technical Report ("Technical Report") for the Feasibility Study on the Mangazeisky Silver Project, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Russian Federation. The Technical Report supports the Company's announcement of June 9, 2016. To view and download the Technical Report, please visit www.sedar.com under the Company's profile. The report will also be available on the Company's website at www.silverbearresources.com. Key Highlights from the June 9, 2016 Feasibility Study press release include:

The pre-tax NPV at a 5% discount rate is US$79.7 million, the pre-tax IRR is 43.6%, and the payback period is 2.1 years.
With the Far East Tax Incentives, the post-tax NPV at a 5% discount rate is US$70.7 million, the IRR is 40.2%, and the payback period is 2.2 years.
Assumptions include a variable silver price of US$16.00/oz, US$17.25/oz, and US$18.00/oz during the first year of production, second year of production, and the remaining project life, respectively, with a life of mine ("LOM") weighted average silver price of US$17.74/oz; exchange rate applied is RUB66.00/USD.
Initial capital costs of US$48.6 million.
Total Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves of 801,000 tonnes at a diluted average grade of 772 g/t Ag for 19.9 million troy ounces of silver.
Total Vertikalny Central Indicated Mineral Resources of 23.4 million troy ounces of silver at an average grade of 909 g/t Ag, in addition to Inferred Mineral Resources of 13.4 million ounces of silver at an average grade of 615 g/t Ag.
Processing an average of 110,000 tonnes of ore per annum.
Production of 16,787,000 ounces of silver over a 7.3-year LOM
Average metallurgical recovery of 84.4% silver.

Project Execution The Company intends to take advantage of the favourable outcome of the feasibility study, and the positive outlook on the silver price, by implementing a fast-track execution plan to complete construction by the end of 2016, with steady state production starting in Q1 2017. In anticipation of this, and in compliance with the Russian regulatory approval process, a licensed Russian design institute (EMC Mining LLC ("EMC") in St Petersburg) was commissioned in 2015 to complete the detailed design of the processing facility and associated mine site infrastructure. The Company procured all major equipment for delivery during the 2015/2016 winter road season and began construction. The Company has proceeded with construction in advance of regulatory approval for the project and expects that all of the permits needed for construction and operation will be in place prior to the start of production. More favourable weather between March and November will facilitate the completion of the construction of major infrastructure with specific focus on completing the buildings to provide shelter during mechanical and electrical installation and the start of commissioning planned for Q4 2016. The feasibility study was prepared by Tetra Tech (UK) and comprised of an independent, multidisciplinary team including SRK Consulting (UK) Limited ("SRK") and Environmental Resource Management Consultants Inc. ("ERM"). Mr. Jacques du Toit, Pr.Eng., MSc.Eng., PMP of Tetra Tech is a Qualified Persons under National Instrument 43-101 and have reviewed the scientific and technical information in this release. About Silver Bear Silver Bear (TSX:SBR) is focused on the development of its wholly-owned Mangazeisky Silver Project, covering a licence area of approximately 570 km2 that includes the high-grade Vertikalny deposit, located 400 km north of Yakutsk in the Republic of Sakha within the Russian Federation. The Company was granted a 20-year mining licence for the Vertikalny deposit in September 2013 and completed a Feasibility Study in Q2 2016. The Company is implementing a fast-track execution plan to complete major construction of the Mangazeisky Silver Project by the end of 2016, with steady state production planned to start in Q1 2017. Other information relating to Silver Bear is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com as well as on the Company's website at www.silverbearresources.com. Cautionary Notes This release contains forward-looking statements and information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Wherever possible, words such as "intends", "expects", "scheduled", "estimates", "anticipates", "believes" and similar expressions or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved, have been used to identify these forward-looking statements. All of the results of Study of constitute forward-looking statements and information, including estimates of internal rates of return, net present value, future production, proposed mining plans and methods, mine life estimates, cash flow forecasts, metal recoveries, and estimates of capital and operating costs. Furthermore, with respect to this specific forward-looking information concerning the development of the Mangazeisky Project, the company has based its assumptions and analysis on certain factors that are inherently uncertain. Uncertainties include among others: (i) weather conditions; (ii) unforeseen changes in geological characteristics; (iii) metallurgical characteristics of the mineralization; (iv) the ability to develop adequate processing and other infrastructure; (v) the price of silver; (vi) the availability of equipment and facilities necessary to complete development; (vii) the cost of consumables and mining and processing equipment; (viii) unforeseen technological and engineering problems; (ix) accidents or acts of sabotage or terrorism; (x) currency fluctuations; (xi) changes in laws or regulations; (xii) the availability and productivity of skilled labour; (xiii) the regulation of the mining industry by various governmental agencies; and (xiv) political factors. Although the forward-looking statements contained in this release reflect management's current beliefs based upon information currently available to management and based upon what management believes to be reasonable assumptions, Silver Bear cannot be certain that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements or information. A number of factors could cause events and achievements to differ materially from the results expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Such risk factors include but are not limited to risk factors identified by Silver Bear in its continuous disclosure filings filed from time to time on SEDAR in addition to those stated above. These factors should be considered carefully and prospective investors should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements necessarily involve significant known and unknown risks, assumptions and uncertainties that may cause Silver Bear's actual results, events, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Although Silver Bear has attempted to identify important risks and factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors and risks that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, prospective investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. These forward-looking statements and information are made as of the date of this release, and Silver Bear assumes no obligation to update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances, unless otherwise required by law. This release also contains references to estimates of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. The estimation of Mineral Resources is inherently uncertain and involves subjective judgments about many relevant factors. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The accuracy of any such estimates is a function of the quantity and quality of available data, and of the assumptions made and judgments used in engineering and geological interpretation (including estimated future production from the Mangazeisky Project, the anticipated tonnages and grades that will be mined and the estimated level of recovery that will be realized), which may prove to be unreliable and depend, to a certain extent, upon the analysis of drilling results and statistical inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. Mineral Resource estimates may have to be re-estimated based on: (i) fluctuations in the silver price; (ii) results of drilling, (iii) metallurgical testing and other studies; (iv) proposed mining operations, including dilution; (v) the evaluation of mine plans subsequent to the date of any estimates; and (vi) the possible failure to receive required permits, approvals and licenses. Mineral Reserves are also disclosed in this release. Mineral Reserves are those portions of Mineral Resources that have demonstrated economic viability after taking into account all mining factors. Mineral Reserves may, in the future, cease to be a Mineral Reserve if economic viability can no longer be demonstrated because of, among other things, adverse changes in commodity prices, changes in law or regulation or changes to mine plans.





Silver Bear Resources Inc.
Graham Hill
President and Chief Executive Officer
Russia T: 7 916 731 5673
[email protected]
Silver Bear Resources Inc.
Judith Webster
Investor Relations Manager
416 453 8818
[email protected]




Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 19.89
SBR's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
82% of the 17 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.11 vs. SBR: 19.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
SBR' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.16  Med: 12.89 Max: 21.34
Current: 19.89
5.16
21.34
PE Ratio without NRI 19.89
SBR's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
84% of the 19 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.11 vs. SBR: 19.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
SBR' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.16  Med: 12.89 Max: 21.34
Current: 19.89
5.16
21.34
PB Ratio 122.77
SBR's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
98% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.61 vs. SBR: 122.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
SBR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 60.35  Med: 126.31 Max: 217.31
Current: 122.77
60.35
217.31
PS Ratio 18.07
SBR's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
97% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.10 vs. SBR: 18.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
SBR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.04  Med: 12.34 Max: 19.38
Current: 18.07
5.04
19.38
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 29.29
SBR's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
97% of the 33 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. SBR: 29.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
SBR' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.67  Med: 16.94 Max: 51.78
Current: 29.29
6.67
51.78
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 29.29
SBR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
96% of the 46 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 4.68 vs. SBR: 29.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
SBR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.67  Med: 16.94 Max: 51.78
Current: 29.29
6.67
51.78
EV-to-EBIT 19.56
SBR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
65% of the 43 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. SBR: 19.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
SBR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.2  Med: 14.35 Max: 45.3
Current: 19.56
5.2
45.3
EV-to-EBITDA 19.56
SBR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
74% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.59 vs. SBR: 19.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
SBR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.2  Med: 14.35 Max: 45.2
Current: 19.56
5.2
45.2
Shiller PE Ratio 9.25
SBR's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 16 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 8.20 vs. SBR: 9.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
SBR' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.17  Med: 12.6 Max: 21.06
Current: 9.25
6.17
21.06
Current Ratio 6.12
SBR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.93 vs. SBR: 6.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
SBR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.81  Med: 6.22 Max: 17.36
Current: 6.12
2.81
17.36
Quick Ratio 6.12
SBR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
87% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.59 vs. SBR: 6.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
SBR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.81  Med: 6.22 Max: 17.36
Current: 6.12
2.81
17.36

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 5.74
SBR's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
65% of the 48 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. SBR: 5.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
SBR' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.69  Med: 7.76 Max: 19.42
Current: 5.74
4.69
19.42
Dividend Payout Ratio 1.00
SBR's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
100% of the 11 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. SBR: 1.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
SBR' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.98  Med: 1 Max: 1.01
Current: 1
0.98
1.01
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -22.50
SBR's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
59% of the 27 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -26.30 vs. SBR: -22.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
SBR' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -22.5  Med: 2.6 Max: 26.7
Current: -22.5
-22.5
26.7
Forward Dividend Yield % 5.74
SBR's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
65% of the 46 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. SBR: 5.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 3.11
SBR's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
76% of the 85 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.48 vs. SBR: 3.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
SBR' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.55  Med: 4.21 Max: 10.54
Current: 3.11
2.55
10.54

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Cash 132.86
SBR's Price-to-Net-Cash is ranked lower than
100% of the 7 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.95 vs. SBR: 132.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Cash only.
SBR' s Price-to-Net-Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 79.58  Med: 132.99 Max: 175.14
Current: 132.86
79.58
175.14
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 132.86
SBR's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
100% of the 12 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.25 vs. SBR: 132.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
SBR' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 79.58  Med: 132.23 Max: 192.1
Current: 132.86
79.58
192.1
Price-to-Tangible-Book 122.77
SBR's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
98% of the 55 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.69 vs. SBR: 122.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
SBR' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.61  Med: 74.87 Max: 170.63
Current: 122.77
15.61
170.63
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 16.46
SBR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
100% of the 30 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.70 vs. SBR: 16.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
SBR' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 2.06 Max: 143.12
Current: 16.46
0.93
143.12
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.46
SBR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
73% of the 55 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.85 vs. SBR: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
SBR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.53  Med: 0.75 Max: 1.38
Current: 1.46
0.53
1.38
Price-to-Graham-Number 10.39
SBR's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
100% of the 18 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. SBR: 10.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
SBR' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.2  Med: 5.23 Max: 11.05
Current: 10.39
2.2
11.05
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.11
SBR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
64% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.83 vs. SBR: 5.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
SBR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.2  Med: 7 Max: 19.4
Current: 5.11
2.2
19.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -9.94
SBR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
59% of the 32 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -6.42 vs. SBR: -9.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
SBR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10  Med: 0.3 Max: 14.7
Current: -9.94
-10
14.7

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $30.03
EPS (TTM) $ 1.87
Beta0.11
Short Percentage of Float0.21%
52-Week Range $32.05 - 40.99
Shares Outstanding (Mil)14.58
» More Articles for SBR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Sabine Royalty Trust Announces Monthly Cash Distribution For April 2017 Apr 06 2017 
Silver Bear Files Technical Report on the Mangazeisky Silver Project Feasibility Study Jul 05 2016 
Silver Bear Announces Entering Into Non-Binding Term Sheet for Mangazeisky Silver Project Debt Fundi Apr 28 2016 
Murray Stahl Buys Exxon, Suncor in 1st Quarter Apr 22 2016 
Silver Bear Announces Mineral Resource Update for Mangazeisky North Deposit at the Mangazeisky Silve Apr 13 2016 
Silver Bear Completes a Private Placement Financing of US$20 Million in Non-Convertible Notes and Pr Mar 30 2016 
Silver Bear Announces Closing of Private Placement of Non-Convertible Note and Provides Corporate Up Jan 13 2016 
Silver Bear Agrees to a Private Placement Financing of C$11.22 Million in Two Tranches of Convertibl Oct 08 2015 
Silver Bear Orders Additional Long Lead Time Equipment and Awards Procurement Contract Sep 28 2015 
Silver Bear Files Technical Report on the Mangazeisky Silver Project Maiden Mineral Resource Aug 26 2015 

More From Other Websites
Sabine Royalty Trust breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : SBR-US : April 24,... Apr 24 2017
Sabine Royalty Trust Announces Monthly Cash Distribution For April 2017 Apr 06 2017
Sabine Royalty Trust :SBR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : March 16, 2017 Mar 16 2017
Sabine Royalty Trust Announces Monthly Cash Distribution For March 2017 Mar 03 2017
Sabine Royalty Trust breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : SBR-US : February 23,... Feb 23 2017
Here's Why These Oil & Gas Royalty Trusts Rallied in January Feb 09 2017
Sabine Royalty Trust Announces Monthly Cash Distribution For February 2017 Feb 03 2017
Sabine Royalty Trust Announces Monthly Cash Distribution For January 2017 Jan 06 2017
Sabine Royalty Trust breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : SBR-US : January 4,... Jan 04 2017
How Sabine Royalty Trust (SBR) Compares to Its Peers Dec 15 2016
Sabine Royalty Trust breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : SBR-US : December 12,... Dec 12 2016
Five Unheralded Energy Plays This Hedge Fund Likes Dec 01 2016
Sabine Royalty Trust :SBR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2016 By the Numbers : November 22, 2016 Nov 22 2016
Sabine Royalty Trust breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : SBR-US : November 7,... Nov 07 2016
Sabine Royalty Trust Announces Monthly Cash Distribution For November 2016 Nov 03 2016
Sabine Royalty Trust breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : SBR-US : October 21,... Oct 21 2016
Sabine Royalty Trust breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : SBR-US : October 11,... Oct 11 2016
Sabine Royalty Trust Announces Monthly Cash Distribution For October 2016 Oct 05 2016
Sabine Royalty Trust :SBR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2016 By the Numbers : August 12, 2016 Aug 12 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)