Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.84
SMID's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
62% of the 681 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 0.43 vs. SMID: 0.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
SMID' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.28 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.84
Equity to Asset 0.56
SMID's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
57% of the 671 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. SMID: 0.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
SMID' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.40 Max: 0.66
Current: 0.56
0.13
0.66
Interest Coverage 3.57
SMID's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
80% of the 481 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 12.89 vs. SMID: 3.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
SMID' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.8  Med: 5.93 Max: 25.18
Current: 3.57
2.8
25.18
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 3.31
M-Score: -1.09
WACC vs ROIC
3.19%
3.20%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 1.47
SMID's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
78% of the 684 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 6.17 vs. SMID: 1.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
SMID' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.32  Med: 3.92 Max: 12.39
Current: 1.47
-5.32
12.39
Net-margin (%) 0.98
SMID's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
74% of the 686 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 4.29 vs. SMID: 0.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
SMID' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.58  Med: 2.01 Max: 7.6
Current: 0.98
-3.58
7.6
ROE (%) 2.38
SMID's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
72% of the 667 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 7.28 vs. SMID: 2.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
SMID' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.42  Med: 6.46 Max: 29.45
Current: 2.38
-16.42
29.45
ROA (%) 1.45
SMID's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
69% of the 690 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 3.26 vs. SMID: 1.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
SMID' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.99  Med: 3.36 Max: 14.4
Current: 1.45
-5.99
14.4
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 4.09
SMID's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
76% of the 686 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 11.46 vs. SMID: 4.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
SMID' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.18  Med: 11.03 Max: 36.74
Current: 4.09
-12.18
36.74
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -6.20
SMID's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
83% of the 594 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 4.30 vs. SMID: -6.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
SMID' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.3  Med: -0.75 Max: 16.9
Current: -6.2
-13.3
16.9
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 31.20
SMID's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
77% of the 459 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 7.70 vs. SMID: 31.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
SMID' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.5  Med: 21.90 Max: 125.2
Current: 31.2
-42.5
125.2
» SMID's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with SMID

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 54.60
SMID's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
86% of the 547 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 15.60 vs. SMID: 54.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
SMID' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.33  Med: 9.63 Max: 261.11
Current: 54.6
2.33
261.11
PE(NRI) 58.75
SMID's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
87% of the 549 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 15.50 vs. SMID: 58.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
SMID' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.29  Med: 9.62 Max: 235
Current: 58.75
2.29
235
P/B 1.02
SMID's P/B is ranked higher than
57% of the 657 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. SMID: 1.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
SMID' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 0.90 Max: 3.23
Current: 1.02
0.33
3.23
P/S 0.44
SMID's P/S is ranked higher than
76% of the 682 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. SMID: 0.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
SMID' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.30 Max: 0.69
Current: 0.44
0.07
0.69
EV-to-EBIT 29.22
SMID's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
82% of the 591 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 13.06 vs. SMID: 29.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
SMID' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -57.4  Med: 5.10 Max: 93.4
Current: 29.22
-57.4
93.4
EV-to-EBITDA 11.10
SMID's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
59% of the 618 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 9.52 vs. SMID: 11.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
SMID' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -51.6  Med: 4.40 Max: 138.3
Current: 11.1
-51.6
138.3
Shiller P/E 18.00
SMID's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
55% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 19.71 vs. SMID: 18.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
SMID' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.27  Med: 12.92 Max: 28.13
Current: 18
4.27
28.13
Current Ratio 2.49
SMID's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
76% of the 667 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.60 vs. SMID: 2.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
SMID' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.05  Med: 2.42 Max: 5.52
Current: 2.49
1.05
5.52
Quick Ratio 2.14
SMID's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
82% of the 666 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. SMID: 2.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
SMID' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 1.74 Max: 4.76
Current: 2.14
0.6
4.76
Days Inventory 33.46
SMID's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
85% of the 660 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 81.07 vs. SMID: 33.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
SMID' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 31.26  Med: 39.52 Max: 51.62
Current: 33.46
31.26
51.62
Days Sales Outstanding 144.40
SMID's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
90% of the 517 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 59.38 vs. SMID: 144.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
SMID' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 59.95  Med: 75.34 Max: 98.31
Current: 144.4
59.95
98.31
Days Payable 50.26
SMID's Days Payable is ranked lower than
67% of the 515 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 65.69 vs. SMID: 50.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
SMID' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.11  Med: 24.28 Max: 40.32
Current: 50.26
14.11
40.32

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 1.76
SMID's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked higher than
77% of the 311 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 5.00 vs. SMID: 1.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
SMID' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 2.09 Max: 45
Current: 1.76
0.93
45
Price/Tangible Book 1.03
SMID's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
60% of the 633 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. SMID: 1.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
SMID' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 1.04 Max: 12.75
Current: 1.03
0.41
12.75
Price/Projected FCF 1.14
SMID's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
53% of the 324 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. SMID: 1.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
SMID' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 0.82 Max: 29.33
Current: 1.14
0.29
29.33
Price/Median PS Value 1.50
SMID's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
76% of the 633 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. SMID: 1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
SMID' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.88 Max: 4.8
Current: 1.5
0.31
4.8
Price/Graham Number 1.65
SMID's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
74% of the 517 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 0.93 vs. SMID: 1.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
SMID' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.62 Max: 3.29
Current: 1.65
0.2
3.29
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 3.44
SMID's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
71% of the 682 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 6.60 vs. SMID: 3.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
SMID' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.1  Med: 14.60 Max: 46.5
Current: 3.44
1.1
46.5

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $26
EPS $ 0.04
Beta0.19
Short Percentage of Float0.00%
52-Week Range $1.77 - 3.59
Shares Outstanding(Mil)4.85

Business Description

Industry: Building Materials » Building Materials
Compare:HCMLY, AHCHY, LFRGY, SHW, MLM » details
Smith-Midland Corp was incorporated in Delaware on August 2, 1994. The Company invents, develops, manufactures, markets, leases, licenses, sells, and installs precast concrete products for use primarily in the construction, highway, utilities and farming industries through its five wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company's precast and barrier rental customers are primarily general contractors and federal, state, and local transportation authorities located in the Mid-Atlantic, Northeastern, Midwestern and Southeastern regions of the United States. The Company's operating strategy has involved producing innovative and proprietary products, including Slenderwall a patented, lightweight, energy efficient concrete and steel exterior wall panel for use in building construction; J-J Hooks Highway Safety Barrier, a patented, positive-connected highway safety barrier; SoftSound, a proprietary sound absorptive finish used on the face of sound barriers to absorb some of the traffic noise; Sierra Wall, a sound barrier primarily for roadside use; Easi-Set and Easi-Span transportable concrete buildings with patented features; and Beach Prisms erosion mitigating modules. In addition, the Company's precast subsidiaries produce custom order precast concrete products with various architectural surfaces, as well as generic highway sound barriers, utility vaults and farm products such as cattleguards and water and feed troughs. The raw materials necessary for the manufacture of the Company's products are available from multiple sources. The Company presently grants licenses, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Easi-Set Industries, for the manufacturing and distribution rights of certain proprietary products, such as the J-J Hooks Barrier, Easi-Set and Easi-Span Precast Buildings, Slenderwall, Softsound and Beach Prisms as well as certain non-proprietary products, such as the Company's cattleguards, and water and feed troughs. The Company has entered into 50 licensing agreements in the United States, eight in Canada and one each in Belgium, New Zealand, Mexico and Australia, for a total of 66 licensees worldwide. The Company's operations are subject to extensive and stringent governmental regulations including regulations related to the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) and environmental protection.
» More Articles for OTCPK:SMID

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Smith-Midland Corporation: Undervalued and Underfollowed Aug 24 2010 

More From Other Websites
Smith-Midland Corp.: Strong price momentum but will it sustain? Feb 01 2016
Smith-Midland Wins Award for Smithsonian National Zoo Project in Washington, DC Jan 27 2016
Fast Installation for New Restroom Building at Fresno State University Stadium Jan 14 2016
Smith-Midland Corporation Announces Upgrade to OTCQX Best Marketplace Jan 14 2016
SMITH MIDLAND CORP Financials Jan 13 2016
PROFIT WARNING (in PDF) Jan 11 2016
SMITH MIDLAND CORP Files SEC form 10-Q/A, Quarterly Report Jan 08 2016
SMITH MIDLAND CORP Files SEC form 10-K/A, Annual Report Jan 08 2016
42,000 Square Feet of SlenderWall(R) Architectural Panels Will Be Used on Major Hudson River... Jan 07 2016
OTC Markets Group Welcomes Smith-Midland to OTCQX Dec 31 2015
Smith-Midland Corporation Announces Upgrade to OTCQX Best Marketplace Dec 30 2015
DISCLOSEABLE TRANSACTION AND CONNECTED TRANSACTION THE ACQUISITION OF EQUITY INTERESTS IN YANGPU... Dec 28 2015
LOAN AGREEMENT: CONNECTED TRANSACTION AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (in PDF) Dec 23 2015
COMPLETION OF SUBSCRIPTION OF NEW SHARES UNDER GENERAL MANDATE (in PDF) Dec 22 2015
(1) COMPLETION AND CLARIFICATION ANNOUNCEMENT; (2) CHANGE IN THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD OF... Dec 16 2015
POLL RESULTS AT THE SPECIAL GENERAL MEETING HELD ON 15 DECEMBER 2015 (in PDF) Dec 15 2015
POLL RESULTS AT THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING HELD ON 7 DECEMBER 2015 (in PDF) Dec 07 2015
TERMS OF REFERENCE OF AUDIT COMMITTEE (in PDF) Dec 07 2015
CLARIFICATION ANNOUNCEMENT (in PDF) Dec 06 2015
(I) SUBSCRIPTION OF NEW SHARES UNDER GENERAL MANDATE AND (II) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING IN RESPECT... Dec 04 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK