Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.51
SMID's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
53% of the 707 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. SMID: 0.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
SMID' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.29 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.51
Equity to Asset 0.57
SMID's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
58% of the 696 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. SMID: 0.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
SMID' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.40 Max: 0.66
Current: 0.57
0.13
0.66
Interest Coverage 22.55
SMID's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
65% of the 571 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 10.24 vs. SMID: 22.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
SMID' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.8  Med: 5.93 Max: 24.77
Current: 22.55
2.8
24.77
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 3.97
M-Score: -1.98
WACC vs ROIC
3.74%
13.92%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 7.16
SMID's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
55% of the 708 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 6.29 vs. SMID: 7.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
SMID' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.32  Med: 3.92 Max: 12.19
Current: 7.16
-5.32
12.19
Net-margin (%) 4.47
SMID's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
52% of the 712 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 4.11 vs. SMID: 4.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
SMID' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.58  Med: 2.01 Max: 7.6
Current: 4.47
-3.58
7.6
ROE (%) 13.64
SMID's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
74% of the 690 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 6.88 vs. SMID: 13.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
SMID' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.42  Med: 6.46 Max: 29.45
Current: 13.64
-16.42
29.45
ROA (%) 8.01
SMID's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
78% of the 716 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 3.22 vs. SMID: 8.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
SMID' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.99  Med: 3.36 Max: 14.4
Current: 8.01
-5.99
14.4
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 21.23
SMID's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 709 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 11.42 vs. SMID: 21.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
SMID' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.18  Med: 11.03 Max: 36.74
Current: 21.23
-12.18
36.74
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -6.20
SMID's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
82% of the 627 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 3.00 vs. SMID: -6.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
SMID' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.6  Med: -0.65 Max: 16.9
Current: -6.2
-12.6
16.9
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 31.70
SMID's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
78% of the 483 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 5.90 vs. SMID: 31.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
SMID' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.5  Med: 21.90 Max: 125.2
Current: 31.7
-42.5
125.2
» SMID's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with SMID

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Building Materials » Building Materials
Compare:OTCPK:IBTGF, OTCPK:CLEV, OTCPK:LXRRF, OTCPK:CTXXF, NAS:CCCL, NAS:CADC, OTCPK:MTWD, NAS:YECO, AMEX:APT, OTCPK:PFBOF, NYSE:BXC, NAS:TGEN, NYSE:ASPN, OTCPK:LKSGF, OTCPK:CWXZF, OTCPK:PPCLY, NAS:TGLS, OTCPK:AACEY, NAS:USLM, NYSE:AFI » details
Smith-Midland Corp invents, develops, manufactures, markets, leases, licenses, sells and installs precast concrete products for use primarily in the construction, highway, utilities and farming industries.

Smith-Midland Corp was incorporated in Delaware on August 2, 1994. The Company invents, develops, manufactures, markets, leases, licenses, sells, and installs precast concrete products for use primarily in the construction, highway, utilities and farming industries through its five wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company's precast and barrier rental customers are primarily general contractors and federal, state, and local transportation authorities located in the Mid-Atlantic, Northeastern, Midwestern and Southeastern regions of the United States. The Company's operating strategy has involved producing innovative and proprietary products, including Slenderwall a patented, lightweight, energy efficient concrete and steel exterior wall panel for use in building construction; J-J Hooks Highway Safety Barrier, a patented, positive-connected highway safety barrier; SoftSound, a proprietary sound absorptive finish used on the face of sound barriers to absorb some of the traffic noise; Sierra Wall, a sound barrier primarily for roadside use; Easi-Set and Easi-Span transportable concrete buildings with patented features; and Beach Prisms erosion mitigating modules. In addition, the Company's precast subsidiaries produce custom order precast concrete products with various architectural surfaces, as well as generic highway sound barriers, utility vaults and farm products such as cattleguards and water and feed troughs. The raw materials necessary for the manufacture of the Company's products are available from multiple sources. The Company presently grants licenses, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Easi-Set Industries, for the manufacturing and distribution rights of certain proprietary products, such as the J-J Hooks Barrier, Easi-Set and Easi-Span Precast Buildings, Slenderwall, Softsound and Beach Prisms as well as certain non-proprietary products, such as the Company's cattleguards, and water and feed troughs. The Company has entered into 50 licensing agreements in the United States, eight in Canada and one each in Belgium, New Zealand, Mexico and Australia, for a total of 66 licensees worldwide. The Company's operations are subject to extensive and stringent governmental regulations including regulations related to the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) and environmental protection.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 8.97
SMID's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
78% of the 625 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 16.23 vs. SMID: 8.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
SMID' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3  Med: 10.46 Max: 235
Current: 8.97
3
235
PE(NRI) 8.97
SMID's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
76% of the 586 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 16.00 vs. SMID: 8.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
SMID' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3  Med: 10.46 Max: 235
Current: 8.97
3
235
P/B 1.13
SMID's P/B is ranked higher than
55% of the 730 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.31 vs. SMID: 1.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
SMID' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 0.92 Max: 3.23
Current: 1.13
0.33
3.23
P/S 0.38
SMID's P/S is ranked higher than
81% of the 747 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 0.97 vs. SMID: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
SMID' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.31 Max: 0.68
Current: 0.38
0.07
0.68
POCF 38.23
SMID's POCF is ranked lower than
91% of the 434 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 9.26 vs. SMID: 38.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
SMID' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.32  Med: 8.31 Max: 3500
Current: 38.23
1.32
3500
EV-to-EBIT 5.85
SMID's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
84% of the 644 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 13.49 vs. SMID: 5.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
SMID' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -57.4  Med: 5.30 Max: 93.4
Current: 5.85
-57.4
93.4
EV-to-EBITDA 4.55
SMID's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
86% of the 683 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 10.15 vs. SMID: 4.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
SMID' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -54.4  Med: 4.40 Max: 138.3
Current: 4.55
-54.4
138.3
Shiller P/E 33.63
SMID's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
65% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 25.70 vs. SMID: 33.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
SMID' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.69  Med: 24.00 Max: 43.75
Current: 33.63
9.69
43.75
Current Ratio 2.68
SMID's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
79% of the 650 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.65 vs. SMID: 2.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
SMID' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.05  Med: 2.42 Max: 5.52
Current: 2.68
1.05
5.52
Quick Ratio 2.17
SMID's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
84% of the 649 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. SMID: 2.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
SMID' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 1.77 Max: 4.76
Current: 2.17
0.6
4.76
Days Inventory 32.04
SMID's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
86% of the 666 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 81.20 vs. SMID: 32.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
SMID' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 31.26  Med: 39.52 Max: 51.62
Current: 32.04
31.26
51.62
Days Sales Outstanding 80.48
SMID's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
68% of the 546 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 58.37 vs. SMID: 80.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
SMID' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 59.95  Med: 75.34 Max: 98.64
Current: 80.48
59.95
98.64
Days Payable 27.09
SMID's Days Payable is ranked lower than
82% of the 497 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 55.39 vs. SMID: 27.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
SMID' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.11  Med: 24.28 Max: 40.32
Current: 27.09
14.11
40.32

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 2.43
SMID's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked higher than
69% of the 349 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 4.99 vs. SMID: 2.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
SMID' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 2.14 Max: 45
Current: 2.43
0.93
45
Price/Tangible Book 1.13
SMID's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
58% of the 702 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.43 vs. SMID: 1.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
SMID' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 1.08 Max: 12.8
Current: 1.13
0.41
12.8
Price/Projected FCF 1.25
SMID's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
60% of the 373 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. SMID: 1.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
SMID' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 0.83 Max: 70
Current: 1.25
0.29
70
Price/Median PS Value 1.25
SMID's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
63% of the 726 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. SMID: 1.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
SMID' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 0.85 Max: 4.57
Current: 1.25
0.3
4.57
Price/Graham Number 0.67
SMID's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
69% of the 550 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.06 vs. SMID: 0.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
SMID' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.65 Max: 3.29
Current: 0.67
0.2
3.29
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 17.11
SMID's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 766 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 5.97 vs. SMID: 17.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
SMID' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.1  Med: 15.30 Max: 46.5
Current: 17.11
1.1
46.5

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $33.06
EPS (TTM) $ 0.29
Beta0.32
Short Percentage of Float0.00%
52-Week Range $1.77 - 3.59
Shares Outstanding (Mil)4.88
» More Articles for SMID

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Smith-Midland Corporation: Undervalued and Underfollowed Aug 24 2010 

More From Other Websites
SMITH MIDLAND CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits Jul 14 2016
An Easi-Span Building Becomes an Updated Spray Aerator for a Town's Water Supply Jun 28 2016
SMITH MIDLAND CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers Jun 01 2016
J-J Hooks Safety Barrier Plays Supporting Role in Community Beautification Project Jun 01 2016
Smith-Midland Corp. :SMID-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2016 By the Numbers May 20 2016
SMITH MIDLAND CORP Financials May 19 2016
SMITH MIDLAND CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial... May 18 2016
SMC Announces Financial Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 May 13 2016
SMITH MIDLAND CORP Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report May 12 2016
SMC Announces Financial Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 May 12 2016
Smith-Midland Corporation announces Financial Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2015 Apr 01 2016
SMITH MIDLAND CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial... Mar 30 2016
SMC Announces Financial Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2015 Mar 28 2016
SMITH MIDLAND CORP Files SEC form 10-K, Annual Report Mar 28 2016
Easi-Set Worldwide Upgrading Multiple Pump Stations for New Jersey Township Mar 08 2016
300,000 Square Feet of Smith-Midland Precast Sound Walls Will Be Installed on Two Major Virginia DOT... Feb 09 2016
Smith-Midland Corp.: Strong price momentum but will it sustain? Feb 01 2016
Smith-Midland Wins Award for Smithsonian National Zoo Project in Washington, DC Jan 27 2016
Fast Installation for New Restroom Building at Fresno State University Stadium Jan 14 2016
Smith-Midland Corporation Announces Upgrade to OTCQX Best Marketplace Jan 14 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)