Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength

vs
industry
vs
history
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth

vs
industry
vs
history
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 9.03
TAO's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
100% of the Companies
in the Global industry.

( Industry Median: vs. TAO: 9.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
TAO' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 9.18
Current: 9.03
0
9.18
PE Ratio without NRI 9.03
TAO's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
100% of the Companies
in the Global industry.

( Industry Median: vs. TAO: 9.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
TAO' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 9.18
Current: 9.03
0
9.18
PB Ratio 0.76
TAO's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
100% of the Companies
in the Global industry.

( Industry Median: vs. TAO: 0.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
TAO' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 0.76
Current: 0.76
0
0.76

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.71
TAO's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
100% of the Companies
in the Global industry.

( Industry Median: vs. TAO: 1.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
TAO' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 1.72
Current: 1.71
0
1.72
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.71
TAO's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
100% of the Companies
in the Global industry.

( Industry Median: vs. TAO: 1.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
TAO' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 1.72
Current: 1.71
0
1.72

More Statistics

Short Percentage of Float0.00%
52-Week Range $18.04 - 24.47
Shares Outstanding (Mil)1,560,000.00
» More Articles for TAO

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Five "New Collar" IBMers Share Advice on Career Success Apr 29 2017 
IBM Named a Leader for its Security Solution in Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Test Apr 29 2017 
Galapagos presents pre-clinical data with selective ADAMTS-5 inhibitor GLPG1972 for osteoarthritis a Apr 29 2017 
3-DAY DEADLINE: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Omega Protein Co Apr 28 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against The Toronto-D Apr 28 2017 
UPCOMING DEADLINE: Lundin Law PC Announces a Securities Class Action Lawsuit against SCYNEXIS, Inc. Apr 28 2017 
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against U.S. Physical The Apr 28 2017 
IMPORTANT SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Inv Apr 28 2017 
APPROACHING DEADLINE: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Walter Inv Apr 28 2017 
IMPORTANT SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces a Securities Class Action Lawsuit against T Apr 28 2017 

More From Other Websites
Niche China ETFs Outperforming Giants Apr 11 2017
ETFs With The Lowest Valuations Apr 11 2017
Is China’s Slowing Real Estate Market a Cause for Concern? Apr 03 2017
What Led China ETFs to Outperform in Q1 2017? Mar 31 2017
Will China’s Real Estate Sector Bottom Out in 2017? Mar 24 2017
3 Emerging Market Funds Paying 6.4%, With 30% Upside Dec 31 2016
Could Donald Trump Send Chinese Stocks Crashing? Dec 12 2016
China ETF Winners One Year Post-Selloff Aug 23 2016
TAG Oil Ltd. :TAO-CA: Earnings Analysis: 2016 By the Numbers : July 22, 2016 Jul 22 2016
TAG Oil Ltd. :TAO-CA: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : July 11, 2016 Jul 11 2016
New Warnings On China Housing Jun 03 2016
Why This China ETF Is Soaring Mar 16 2016
The Top 5 ETFs to Track the Hang Seng for 2016 (EWH, FXI) Dec 31 2015
Forget China turmoil, Alibaba and Baidu are buys: ETF CEO Sep 02 2015
Looking to Go Short on China? Here's How Aug 14 2015
More U.S. Properties Are Being Snapped Up by Chinese Companies May 15 2015
Meet This Year’s Top International Real Estate ETF May 15 2015
China's Housing Market Still Struggling After the Interest Rate Cut Dec 02 2014
Hong Kong ETFs in Focus on Huge Pro-Democracy Protests Oct 03 2014
3 ETFs For Investing In International Real Estate Sep 04 2014

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK