Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.04
TCP's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
64% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.11 vs. TCP: 0.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
TCP' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.03 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.04
Equity-to-Asset 0.35
TCP's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
55% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.39 vs. TCP: 0.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
TCP' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.61 Max: 0.81
Current: 0.35
0.34
0.81
Interest Coverage 4.95
TCP's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
55% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.76 vs. TCP: 4.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
TCP' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.49  Med: 5.63 Max: 19.37
Current: 4.95
3.49
19.37
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 1.51
Beneish M-Score: -2.57
WACC vs ROIC
8.43%
10.21%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 65.41
TCP's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
96% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 15.55 vs. TCP: 65.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
TCP' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 57.6  Med: 63.11 Max: 89.37
Current: 65.41
57.6
89.37
Net Margin % 10.06
TCP's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
64% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 5.76 vs. TCP: 10.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
TCP' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.95  Med: 43.44 Max: 70.27
Current: 10.06
2.95
70.27
ROE % 2.52
TCP's ROE % is ranked lower than
53% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 5.36 vs. TCP: 2.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
TCP' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.16  Med: 11.42 Max: 14.76
Current: 2.52
-0.16
14.76
ROA % 1.50
TCP's ROA % is ranked lower than
53% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.83 vs. TCP: 1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
TCP' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 7.29 Max: 8.41
Current: 1.5
0.4
8.41
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 5.75
TCP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
52% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.22 vs. TCP: 5.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
TCP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.98  Med: 31.96 Max: 96.48
Current: 5.75
-5.98
96.48
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -5.80
TCP's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
58% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -10.60 vs. TCP: -5.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
TCP' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 24.1
Current: -5.8
0
24.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -27.20
TCP's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
92% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -0.50 vs. TCP: -27.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
TCP' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -27.2  Med: 12.1 Max: 27
Current: -27.2
-27.2
27
GuruFocus has detected 11 Warning Signs with TC Pipelines LP $TCP.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» TCP's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-02-27)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

TCP Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 69,500 sh (+54.79%)
» More
Q2 2016

TCP Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 108,900 sh (+56.69%)
» More
Q3 2016

TCP Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 181,700 sh (+66.85%)
» More
Q4 2016

TCP Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 91,500 sh (-49.64%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with TCP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Midstream » Oil & Gas Midstream    NAICS: 486210    SIC: 4922
Compare:NYSE:NS, OTCPK:ATGFF, NYSE:BWP, NYSE:GEL, NYSE:ENLC, OTCPK:FCGYF, OTCPK:EBGUF, NYSE:DCP, OTCPK:KEYUF, NYSE:TLLP, NYSE:FI, NYSE:SHLX, NYSE:RMP, NYSE:SEMG, NYSE:HEP, NYSE:EQM, NYSE:ENLK, OTCPK:GBNXF, NYSE:CEQP, NYSE:CPPL » details
Traded in other countries:TC0.Germany,
TC Pipelines LP together with its subsidiaries acquires, owns and participates in the management of energy infrastructure businesses in North America.

TC Pipelines LP is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership formed in 1998 by TransCanada Corporation and its subsidiaries to acquire own and participate in the management of energy infrastructure businesses in North America. The Company is managed by its general partner, TC PipeLines GP, Inc. which is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of TransCanada. Through its pipeline systems, the Company transports natural gas in the United States. The Company has equity ownership interests in four natural gas interstate pipeline systems that are accounted for on an equity basis and two wholly-owned pipelines that are accounted for on a consolidated basis. Collectively, it is designed to transport approximately 8.9 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas from producing regions and import facilities to market hubs and consuming markets mainly in the Western and Midwestern U.S.. All of its pipeline systems are operated by subsidiaries of TransCanada. The Company's customers are large utilities, local distribution companies and natural gas marketers and producing companies. The Company's pipelines generate revenue by charging rates for transporting natural gas. The majority of its pipeline systems' natural gas transportation services are provided through firm service transportation contracts with a reservation or demand charge which reserves pipeline capacity, regardless of use, for the term of the contract. Through its disciplined investment philosophy, the Company now has investments in six critical FERC regulated, low-risk energy infrastructure pipelines. The Company's pipelines are subject to stringent and complex federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing environmental protection, including air emissions, water quality, wastewater discharges and solid waste management.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 247.00
TCP's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
98% of the 53 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 26.35 vs. TCP: 247.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
TCP' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.77  Med: 16.6 Max: 273.85
Current: 247
6.77
273.85
Forward PE Ratio 20.04
TCP's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
69% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 25.13 vs. TCP: 20.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 247.00
TCP's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
98% of the 52 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 26.81 vs. TCP: 247.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
TCP' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.77  Med: 16.6 Max: 273.85
Current: 247
6.77
273.85
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 42.76
TCP's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
74% of the 23 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 23.38 vs. TCP: 42.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
TCP' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.45  Med: 13.83 Max: 49.32
Current: 42.76
6.45
49.32
PB Ratio 3.75
TCP's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
76% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.12 vs. TCP: 3.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
TCP' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 1.87 Max: 3.82
Current: 3.75
0.73
3.82
PS Ratio 8.40
TCP's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
90% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.62 vs. TCP: 8.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
TCP' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.85  Med: 7.72 Max: 152.96
Current: 8.4
3.85
152.96
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 13.80
TCP's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
64% of the 39 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 21.02 vs. TCP: 13.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
TCP' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.3  Med: 12.88 Max: 16.83
Current: 13.8
6.3
16.83
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 12.51
TCP's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
69% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 10.08 vs. TCP: 12.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
TCP' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.51  Med: 11.04 Max: 16.67
Current: 12.51
4.51
16.67
EV-to-EBIT 55.01
TCP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
91% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 23.16 vs. TCP: 55.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
TCP' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.2  Med: 17.6 Max: 16377.2
Current: 55.01
7.2
16377.2
EV-to-EBITDA 31.00
TCP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
86% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 15.14 vs. TCP: 31.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
TCP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.4  Med: 15.15 Max: 584.9
Current: 31
6.4
584.9
Shiller PE Ratio 24.27
TCP's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
56% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 26.42 vs. TCP: 24.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
TCP' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.14  Med: 16.58 Max: 27.15
Current: 24.27
12.14
27.15
Current Ratio 1.56
TCP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
79% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.94 vs. TCP: 1.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
TCP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 1.08 Max: 20.2
Current: 1.56
0.02
20.2
Quick Ratio 1.47
TCP's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
79% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.83 vs. TCP: 1.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
TCP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 1.07 Max: 20.2
Current: 1.47
0.02
20.2
Days Inventory 36.50
TCP's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
84% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 17.29 vs. TCP: 36.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
TCP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.69  Med: 18.25 Max: 35.49
Current: 36.5
3.69
35.49
Days Sales Outstanding 23.72
TCP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
74% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 35.92 vs. TCP: 23.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
TCP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.98  Med: 22.24 Max: 29.52
Current: 23.72
5.98
29.52

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 6.01
TCP's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
76% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.84 vs. TCP: 6.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
TCP' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.33  Med: 6.75 Max: 14.51
Current: 6.01
4.33
14.51
Dividend Payout Ratio 14.44
TCP's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 113 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. TCP: 14.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
TCP' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.97  Med: 1.02 Max: 1.49
Current: 14.44
0.97
1.49
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 3.70
TCP's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
70% of the 53 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.10 vs. TCP: 3.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
TCP' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.6  Med: 4.2 Max: 49.1
Current: 3.7
2.6
49.1
Forward Dividend Yield % 6.09
TCP's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
80% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.27 vs. TCP: 6.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 7.02
TCP's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
90% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.97 vs. TCP: 7.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
TCP' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.07  Med: 7.9 Max: 16.99
Current: 7.02
5.07
16.99
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -7.40
TCP's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
50% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -7.40 vs. TCP: -7.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
TCP' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -38.2  Med: -6.7 Max: -1.9
Current: -7.4
-38.2
-1.9

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 4.25
TCP's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
68% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.75 vs. TCP: 4.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
TCP' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.83  Med: 1.93 Max: 4.03
Current: 4.25
0.83
4.03
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.20
TCP's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
74% of the 43 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.64 vs. TCP: 1.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
TCP' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.62  Med: 0.9 Max: 1.37
Current: 1.2
0.62
1.37
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.09
TCP's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
65% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. TCP: 1.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
TCP' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.01 Max: 16.89
Current: 1.09
0.58
16.89
Price-to-Graham-Number 6.83
TCP's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
91% of the 33 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.30 vs. TCP: 6.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
TCP' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.61  Med: 1.08 Max: 6.31
Current: 6.83
0.61
6.31
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 1.80
TCP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
67% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. TCP: 1.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
TCP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 5.7 Max: 13.9
Current: 1.8
0.2
13.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -7.28
TCP's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
64% of the 56 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -3.52 vs. TCP: -7.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
TCP' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.4  Med: 5 Max: 68.7
Current: -7.28
-7.4
68.7

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $477.0
EPS (TTM) $ 0.25
Beta1.10
Short Percentage of Float0.74%
52-Week Range $40.10 - 64.36
Shares Outstanding (Mil)68.91

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 479 486 512
EPS ($) 3.05 3.08 3.10
EPS without NRI ($) 3.05 3.08 3.10
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 3.71 3.96 4.20
» More Articles for TCP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
An MLP With 17 Consecutive Years of Distribution Growth & a 6.4% Yield Jan 06 2017 
Are Storm Clouds Gathering For These 5 High-Yielding Securities? Jul 16 2014 
Screening with Ben Graham’s Lost Magic Formula in 1976 Jun 13 2013 
What to Do When a Stock Fails to Raise Its Dividend Jul 17 2012 
The Safest and Best Yielding Dividend Contenders May 15 2012 
The 20 Best-Yielding Dividend Achievers Mar 29 2012 

More From Other Websites
TC PIPELINES LP Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits Feb 13 2017
TC PipeLines, LP to Release Fourth Quarter and Year End 2016 Financial Results on February 27 Feb 13 2017
The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: TransCanada, Energy Transfer Partners, Sunoco Logistics Partners,... Jan 26 2017
TC PIPELINES LP Files SEC form 8-K, Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits Jan 23 2017
TC PipeLines, LP Announces 2016 Fourth Quarter Cash Distribution Jan 23 2017
Coverage initiated on TC Pipelines by Ladenburg Thalmann Jan 20 2017
How Does TC PipeLines’ Valuation Compare to Its Peers? Jan 09 2017
What Does Short Interest in TC PipeLines Indicate? Jan 09 2017
Are Institutional Investors Increasing Their TCP Holdings? Jan 06 2017
An MLP With 17 Consecutive Years of Distribution Growth Jan 06 2017
TC PipeLines’ Contract Structures Provide Cash Flow Stability Jan 06 2017
Analyzing TC PipeLines’ Distributions and Capital Expenditures Jan 06 2017
What Does TC PipeLines’ Leverage Indicate? Jan 06 2017
What Do Analysts Recommend for TC PipeLines? Jan 06 2017
TC PipeLines Might Benefit from TransCanada in 2017 Jan 06 2017
Is TC Pipelines, LP (TCP) A Good Stock to Buy? Dec 21 2016
TC Pipelines LP – Value Analysis (NYSE:TCP) : December 20, 2016 Dec 20 2016
TC Pipelines LP breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : TCP-US : December 19, 2016 Dec 19 2016
Zacks Industry Outlook Highlights: Diamondback Energy, Matador Resources, TC PipeLines, Chevron and... Dec 07 2016
Zacks.com featured highlights: Veeva Systems, Arista Networks, TC PipeLines, Tristate Capital... Dec 05 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)