Switch to:
Also traded in: Brazil, Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.80
TIF's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
54% of the 944 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. TIF: 0.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
TIF' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.63 Max: 1.08
Current: 0.8
0.21
1.08
Equity to Asset 0.57
TIF's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
64% of the 927 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.48 vs. TIF: 0.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
TIF' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 0.57 Max: 0.66
Current: 0.57
0.49
0.66
Interest Coverage 19.15
TIF's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
50% of the 725 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 19.26 vs. TIF: 19.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
TIF' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.86  Med: 13.90 Max: 18.29
Current: 19.15
4.86
18.29
F-Score: 6
Z-Score: 4.95
M-Score: -2.79
WACC vs ROIC
14.57%
15.55%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 18.52
TIF's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 940 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.43 vs. TIF: 18.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
TIF' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.55  Med: 18.21 Max: 20.97
Current: 18.52
7.55
20.97
Net-margin (%) 11.30
TIF's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
89% of the 940 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.20 vs. TIF: 11.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
TIF' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.5  Med: 10.99 Max: 12.06
Current: 11.3
4.5
12.06
ROE (%) 16.17
TIF's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
77% of the 926 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 6.81 vs. TIF: 16.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
TIF' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.82  Med: 16.49 Max: 19.41
Current: 16.17
6.82
19.41
ROA (%) 8.99
TIF's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
81% of the 947 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.91 vs. TIF: 8.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
TIF' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.87  Med: 9.59 Max: 11.13
Current: 8.99
3.87
11.13
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 23.11
TIF's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
63% of the 942 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.88 vs. TIF: 23.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
TIF' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.01  Med: 24.16 Max: 28.6
Current: 23.11
10.01
28.6
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 2.30
TIF's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
51% of the 779 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.50 vs. TIF: 2.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
TIF' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.3  Med: 9.30 Max: 16
Current: 2.3
2.3
16
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 3.20
TIF's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
52% of the 649 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. TIF: 3.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
TIF' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.9  Med: 9.10 Max: 31.9
Current: 3.2
-12.9
31.9
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 3.40
TIF's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
55% of the 599 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. TIF: 3.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
TIF' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.1  Med: 9.50 Max: 35.5
Current: 3.4
-21.1
35.5
» TIF's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-05-27)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

TIF Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Caxton Associates 185,000 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 4,086 sh (New)
Jim Simons 231,600 sh (+682.35%)
Ruane Cunniff 2,176,892 sh (+1.81%)
Chris Davis 5,000 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund Sold Out
John Rogers 370,204 sh (-0.13%)
Ron Baron 386,159 sh (-0.44%)
Jeremy Grantham 68,792 sh (-1.01%)
Mario Gabelli 19,260 sh (-1.58%)
Joel Greenblatt 75,735 sh (-36.80%)
Paul Tudor Jones 12,205 sh (-58.89%)
» More
Q3 2015

TIF Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Chuck Royce 16,600 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 78,700 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 427,843 sh (+464.92%)
John Rogers 384,751 sh (+3.93%)
Chris Davis 5,000 sh (unchged)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Ruane Cunniff 2,165,713 sh (-0.51%)
Ron Baron 347,820 sh (-9.93%)
Paul Tudor Jones 6,944 sh (-43.11%)
Mario Gabelli 9,155 sh (-52.47%)
» More
Q4 2015

TIF Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Chuck Royce 22,740 sh (+36.99%)
John Rogers 389,006 sh (+1.11%)
Mario Gabelli 9,170 sh (+0.16%)
Caxton Associates 240,000 sh (unchged)
Chris Davis 5,000 sh (unchged)
Spiros Segalas 2,598,734 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Ron Baron 347,639 sh (-0.05%)
Ruane Cunniff 2,146,719 sh (-0.88%)
Paul Tudor Jones 3,417 sh (-50.79%)
» More
2016

TIF Guru Trades in 2016

Spiros Segalas 1,901,688 sh (-26.82%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with TIF

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Tiffany & Co

Sequoia Fund Comments on Tiffany & Co. - Aug 27, 2015

David Poppe:



I will talk about Tiffany (NYSE:TIF) and Saatvik can talk a little bit about Richemont. I will give you the high level view. The high level view we have is that Cartier and Tiffany are two of the great jewelry brands in the world. We have owned Tiffany not consecutively but for most of the last 14 or 15 years; so we feel like we know it pretty well. What I would say about Tiffany is it has grown the topline at about 7% over the last decade, which is good, not great but good. But it is still immature in a lot of parts of the world. Except for Japan, Tiffany was very late to Asia-Pac, very conservative about expanding in Europe. American luxury — I think a lot of Europeans do not believe in it, and Tiffany was conservative about enlarging the store base there. But in the last few years, Tiffany has opened a bunch of stores in Europe including one on the Champs-Élysées in Paris, and done very well. The company has gotten more aggressive in the last few years about opening stores in China, and not only are those stores doing really well, but the engagement ring custom is catching on there as it did in Japan, I want to say in the ‘70s. It seems like that is going to become a custom for people all through Asia as well, which is good for Tiffany since the company has a strong position in higher-priced engagement rings.



Tiffany managers have been very good stewards of the brand and very good store operators, although not as financially sophisticated as they might have been in some cases. So we think there is good operating margin potential for Tiffany. The tax rate is an American tax rate, even though over half the sales come from outside the United States. So there should be good opportunity to manage the tax rate. The company is talking about getting it from 34% − 35% to 30%, which is a good opportunity for earnings growth.



If I think about a sustainable 5% − 6% − 7% − 8% revenue growth rate, operating margins that could be higher, and a lower tax rate, I feel pretty good about Tiffany. Again, the bigger picture is it works everywhere. The comps right now... the earnings this year will be tricky because currency is so much against you when you do a lot of your sales outside the United States, and Tiffany makes a lot of the product in the States. So it is probably going to have a difficult earnings year in 2015. But longer term, branded jewelry is taking share from unbranded jewelry at a rate of something like a point a year. Cartier and Tiffany ought to be two major beneficiaries of that trend.



From Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb Investor Day 2015 Transcript Part I.



Check out Ruane Cunniff latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Tiffany & Co

Sequoia Fund Comments on Tiffany & Co.
David Poppe: Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 19.85
TIF's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
54% of the 710 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 19.06 vs. TIF: 19.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
TIF' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.98  Med: 20.52 Max: 76.48
Current: 19.85
7.98
76.48
Forward P/E 18.25
TIF's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
69% of the 173 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 15.92 vs. TIF: 18.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 19.85
TIF's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
54% of the 709 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 18.98 vs. TIF: 19.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
TIF' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.92  Med: 20.27 Max: 76.54
Current: 19.85
7.92
76.54
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 18.60
TIF's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked higher than
53% of the 424 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 20.23 vs. TIF: 18.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
TIF' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.91  Med: 39.51 Max: 2551.79
Current: 18.6
9.91
2551.79
P/B 3.19
TIF's P/B is ranked lower than
73% of the 914 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.63 vs. TIF: 3.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
TIF' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.34  Med: 3.27 Max: 4.82
Current: 3.19
1.34
4.82
P/S 2.28
TIF's P/S is ranked lower than
83% of the 920 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. TIF: 2.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
TIF' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.77  Med: 2.31 Max: 3.28
Current: 2.28
0.77
3.28
PFCF 16.44
TIF's PFCF is ranked higher than
54% of the 368 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 18.26 vs. TIF: 16.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
TIF' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.2  Med: 45.54 Max: 1932.88
Current: 16.44
8.2
1932.88
POCF 11.34
TIF's POCF is ranked higher than
50% of the 486 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 11.61 vs. TIF: 11.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
TIF' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.29  Med: 21.69 Max: 110.35
Current: 11.34
7.29
110.35
EV-to-EBIT 12.17
TIF's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
56% of the 729 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.59 vs. TIF: 12.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
TIF' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.8  Med: 13.15 Max: 40.1
Current: 12.17
4.8
40.1
EV-to-EBITDA 9.57
TIF's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
56% of the 765 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 10.83 vs. TIF: 9.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
TIF' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4  Med: 10.50 Max: 25.6
Current: 9.57
4
25.6
PEG 6.55
TIF's PEG is ranked lower than
83% of the 306 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.88 vs. TIF: 6.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
TIF' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 2.16 Max: 86.08
Current: 6.55
0.6
86.08
Shiller P/E 25.49
TIF's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
62% of the 231 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 21.19 vs. TIF: 25.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
TIF' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.78  Med: 28.02 Max: 40.58
Current: 25.49
9.78
40.58
Current Ratio 4.81
TIF's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
94% of the 889 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.56 vs. TIF: 4.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
TIF' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.51  Med: 3.67 Max: 5.59
Current: 4.81
2.51
5.59
Quick Ratio 1.76
TIF's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
80% of the 889 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.85 vs. TIF: 1.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
TIF' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.74  Med: 1.27 Max: 2.21
Current: 1.76
0.74
2.21
Days Inventory 527.30
TIF's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
98% of the 887 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 88.17 vs. TIF: 527.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
TIF' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 358.74  Med: 460.58 Max: 518.81
Current: 527.3
358.74
518.81
Days Sales Outstanding 18.35
TIF's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
59% of the 716 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.00 vs. TIF: 18.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
TIF' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.74  Med: 19.76 Max: 24.09
Current: 18.35
16.74
24.09
Days Payable 28.91
TIF's Days Payable is ranked lower than
79% of the 717 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 51.17 vs. TIF: 28.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
TIF' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 25.15  Med: 27.68 Max: 58
Current: 28.91
25.15
58

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 2.23
TIF's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
54% of the 874 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.35 vs. TIF: 2.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
TIF' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.65  Med: 1.57 Max: 3.83
Current: 2.23
0.65
3.83
Dividend Payout 0.44
TIF's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
81% of the 571 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. TIF: 0.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
TIF' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.18 Max: 0.95
Current: 0.44
0.11
0.95
Dividend Growth (3y) 8.10
TIF's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
61% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 4.60 vs. TIF: 8.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
TIF' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.1  Med: 22.20 Max: 34.9
Current: 8.1
8.1
34.9
Forward Dividend Yield 2.22
TIF's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
54% of the 831 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.54 vs. TIF: 2.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 3.66
TIF's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
59% of the 1091 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.89 vs. TIF: 3.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
TIF' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.07  Med: 2.57 Max: 6.28
Current: 3.66
1.07
6.28
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.30
TIF's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 536 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: -0.50 vs. TIF: -0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
TIF' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.5  Med: 0.20 Max: 4.6
Current: -0.3
-2.5
4.6

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 7.02
TIF's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
63% of the 456 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 4.38 vs. TIF: 7.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
TIF' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.91  Med: 7.47 Max: 17.54
Current: 7.02
4.91
17.54
Price/Tangible Book 3.23
TIF's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
68% of the 850 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.87 vs. TIF: 3.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
TIF' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.65  Med: 3.39 Max: 7.08
Current: 3.23
1.65
7.08
Price/Projected FCF 2.26
TIF's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
75% of the 444 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.19 vs. TIF: 2.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
TIF' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.24  Med: 2.69 Max: 6.64
Current: 2.26
1.24
6.64
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 1.78
TIF's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
78% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.18 vs. TIF: 1.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 0.97
TIF's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
51% of the 750 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. TIF: 0.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
TIF' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 0.95 Max: 1.6
Current: 0.97
0.4
1.6
Price/Graham Number 1.69
TIF's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
60% of the 613 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.41 vs. TIF: 1.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
TIF' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.91  Med: 1.72 Max: 3.46
Current: 1.69
0.91
3.46
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 8.19
TIF's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
65% of the 918 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.80 vs. TIF: 8.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
TIF' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.5  Med: 7.60 Max: 20.7
Current: 8.19
2.5
20.7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 2.74
TIF's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
57% of the 507 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.56 vs. TIF: 2.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
TIF' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.5  Med: 10.15 Max: 15.5
Current: 2.74
1.5
15.5

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $4105
EPS $ 3.60
Beta1.88
Short Percentage of Float10.15%
52-Week Range $59.73 - 96.43
Shares Outstanding(Mil)126.04

Analyst Estimate

Jan17 Jan18
Revenue(Mil) 4,133 4,339
EPS($) 3.95 4.13
EPS without NRI($) 3.95 4.13

Business Description

Industry: Retail - Apparel & Specialty » Luxury Goods
Compare:XSWX:UHR, OCSE:PNDORA, NYSE:COH, NYSE:SIG » details
Traded in other countries:TIFF34.Brazil, TIF.Germany, TIF.Mexico,
Tiffany & Co was incorporated in New York in 1868. It is a holding company that operates all business through its subsidiary companies. The Company through its subsidiary operates as a jeweler and specialty retailer of fine jewelry. The Company's product category is jewelry. The Company sells timepieces, sterling silver goods, china crystal, stationery, fragrances, personal accessories and leather goods. The Company is also Company is engaged in product design, manufacturing and retailing activities. Geographically it is segmented into four segments namely America, Asia-Pacific, Japan, Europe and UAE. The Company advertises in newspapers, magazines and through digital media. The Company engages in a program of media activities and marketing events to maintain consumer awareness of the Brand and TIFFANY & CO. products. The designations TIFFANY(r) and TIFFANY & CO. (r) are the trademarks of the Company. The Company encounters competitions in all product lines in which the company is active, and it competes on the basis of brand reputation for quality products, customer service and merchandising.
» More Articles for TIF

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Signet Jewelers' Prospects Are Not Limited Mar 29 2016 
A Hidden Jewel? Mar 21 2016 
Sequoia Fund Comments on Tiffany & Co. Aug 27 2015 
Coach: Don’t Beat A Dead Horse Jul 24 2015 
Tiffany & Company: My Take Remains Unchanged Jun 03 2015 
Tiffany’s Q1 Results Surprise The Street, But Management Takes A Cautious Stand Jun 02 2015 
Tiffany & Co. Posts Upbeat Q1 Results May 29 2015 
Tiffany & Co Q1 – How Will It Go? May 27 2015 
Why Did Tiffany & Co Fail To Shine In Recent Quarter? May 26 2015 
Tiffany Is Not A Buy As Of Now May 22 2015 

More From Other Websites
Will Tiffany (TIF) Stock Go Up on Oppenheimer's Price Target Hike? Apr 21 2016
This is the ultimate engagement ring for American brides Apr 19 2016
Hard world for the super rich Apr 14 2016
Tiffany & Co. to sell via fashion site Net-a-Porter Apr 12 2016
Tiffany: diamond or dud? Apr 12 2016
Trader thinks Tiffany 'a diamond' Apr 12 2016
How Tiffany Plans to Sell a Lot More Jewelry Apr 12 2016
NET-A-PORTER and Tiffany & Co. Announce Global Collaboration Apr 12 2016
Bearish trades in Tiffany before earnings Apr 11 2016
What you're missing with Bed Bath & Beyond & more Apr 04 2016
Will Tiffany (TIF) Stock Rise as Nomura Remains Confident Before Investor Day? Apr 04 2016
Why Tiffany (TIF) May Not Be a Good Pick for Your Portfolio Apr 01 2016
The pulse of Main Street Mar 31 2016
TIFFANY & CO Financials Mar 31 2016
Tiffany to Host Investor Day on April 12, 2016 Mar 30 2016
Tiffany to Host Investor Day on April 12, 2016 Mar 30 2016
The C-Suite Speaks: Getting Back on Track Mar 29 2016
TIFFANY & CO Files SEC form 10-K, Annual Report Mar 28 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK