Switch to:
Also traded in: Canada, Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.34
TRQ's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
76% of the 1545 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 291.20 vs. TRQ: 0.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
TRQ' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 1.41 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.34
Equity-to-Asset 0.70
TRQ's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
66% of the 724 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. TRQ: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
TRQ' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.7 Max: 1.03
Current: 0.7
0.31
1.03
Interest Coverage 0.05
TRQ's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
100% of the 1021 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 10000.00 vs. TRQ: 0.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
TRQ' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 9.12 Max: 41.18
Current: 0.05
0.05
41.18
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 0.86
Beneish M-Score: 75.40
WACC vs ROIC
-9.00%
1.36%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 0.46
TRQ's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
53% of the 743 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. TRQ: 0.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
TRQ' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9694.95  Med: -404.48 Max: 11.63
Current: 0.46
-9694.95
11.63
Net Margin % 17.65
TRQ's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
86% of the 746 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 0.29 vs. TRQ: 17.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
TRQ' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5889.73  Med: -265.09 Max: 19.17
Current: 17.65
-5889.73
19.17
ROE % 2.44
TRQ's ROE % is ranked higher than
76% of the 1395 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -10.31 vs. TRQ: 2.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
TRQ' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -91.31  Med: -13.04 Max: 4.06
Current: 2.44
-91.31
4.06
ROA % 1.96
TRQ's ROA % is ranked higher than
79% of the 1566 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -9.58 vs. TRQ: 1.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
TRQ' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -68.35  Med: -7.2 Max: 4.15
Current: 1.96
-68.35
4.15
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 1.59
TRQ's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
72% of the 1487 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -13.76 vs. TRQ: 1.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
TRQ' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -277.2  Med: -12.48 Max: 2.4
Current: 1.59
-277.2
2.4
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 107.00
TRQ's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
99% of the 624 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -3.70 vs. TRQ: 107.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
TRQ' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 11.75 Max: 750.9
Current: 107
0
750.9
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 21.40
TRQ's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
82% of the 990 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -20.60 vs. TRQ: 21.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
TRQ' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -46.6  Med: 2.5 Max: 45.3
Current: 21.4
-46.6
45.3
» TRQ's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-07-19 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

TRQ Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Ray Dalio 605,000 sh (+19.40%)
Prem Watsa 1,150,400 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt 32,332 sh (-0.02%)
Paul Tudor Jones 21,614 sh (-14.74%)
Jim Simons 416,338 sh (-55.93%)
» More
Q2 2016

TRQ Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Steven Cohen 1,138,500 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 617,100 sh (+2.00%)
Prem Watsa 1,150,400 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones 21,276 sh (-1.56%)
» More
Q3 2016

TRQ Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 413,300 sh (New)
Prem Watsa 1,150,400 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Ray Dalio 605,500 sh (-1.88%)
» More
Q4 2016

TRQ Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jeremy Grantham 13,100 sh (New)
Jim Simons 683,500 sh (+65.38%)
Prem Watsa 1,150,400 sh (unchged)
Ray Dalio 507,100 sh (-16.25%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with TRQ

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Metals & Mining » Copper    NAICS: 331420    SIC: 2971
Compare:OTCPK:LUNMF, OTCPK:FQVLF, OTCPK:OZMLF, NYSE:HBM, AMEX:NSU, OTCPK:SYAAF, OTCPK:IPMLF, OTCPK:CSFFF, OTCPK:MLXEF, OTCPK:TZNZF, OTCPK:CPPMF, OTCPK:ARREF, OTCPK:GPHYF, OTCPK:CPFXF, OTCPK:NEVDF, OTCPK:APCDF, OTCPK:AZRMF, OTCPK:HDRSF, OTCPK:BZDLF, OTCPK:HLGVF » details
Traded in other countries:TRQ.Canada, IHM.Germany,
Headquarter Location:Canada
Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd is a mining company engaged in the operation and further development of the Oyu Tolgoi copper-gold mine in southern Mongolia, which is the Company's principal and only material mineral resource property.

Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd was incorporated under the Company Act (British Columbia) on January 25, 1994 under the name 463212 B.C. Ltd. The Company is a mining company engaged in the operation and further development of the Oyu Tolgoi copper-gold mine in southern Mongolia, which is the Company's principal and only material mineral resource property. The Oyu Tolgoi copper and gold project (Oyu Tolgoi) is located in the Southern Gobi region of Mongolia and is being developed by Oyu Tolgoi LLC. The Company has one operating segment, Oyu Tolgoi with its copper-gold mine in southern Mongolia. The Company's mining operations and exploration activities are subject to extensive laws and regulations.

Top Ranked Articles about Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd

Turquoise Hill Provides Update on Progress Toward Underground Construction
VANCOUVER, BC--(Marketwired - June 07, 2016) - Turquoise Hill Resources today provided an update on progress toward the start of underground construction, including project finance drawdown and the signing of an engineering, procurement and construction management (EPCM) contract.Project finance drawdownOyu Tolgoi has drawn down approximately $4.0 billion of the project finance facility that was signed in December 2015 and provided by a syndicate of international financial institutions, export credit agencies representing the governments of Canada, the United States, and Australia as well as 15 commercial banks. Steps are being taken to finalize the drawdown of the additional $0.4 billion and are expected to be largely complete in the coming weeks. As part of the project finance facility, a debt cap of $6.0 billion for Oyu Tolgoi was agreed, which provides the possibility for an additional $1.6 billion of supplemental debt in the future.In accordance with the Amended and Restated Shareholders' Agreement (ARSHA) dated June 8, 2011, Turquoise Hill has funded Oyu Tolgoi's cash requirements beyond internally generated cash flows by a combination of equity investment and shareholder debt. For amounts funded by debt, Oyu Tolgoi must repay such amounts, including accrued interest, before it can pay common share dividends. Net funding received to date has been used by Oyu Tolgoi to pay down shareholder loans payable to Turquoise Hill. Net funding will be available for drawdown by Oyu Tolgoi as required for the development of the underground mine. The shareholder loans bear interest at an effective annual rate of LIBOR plus 6.5%. EPCM contract signingOyu Tolgoi LLC has signed a contract with Jacobs Engineering Group (Jacobs) to provide EPCM services for underground development, which paves the way for construction to begin. Jacobs will be responsible for the materials handling systems for the underground mine and associated surface and underground infrastructure. The project is expected to be delivered over a five to seven-year period.About Turquoise Hill Resources Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE: TRQ) (NASDAQ: TRQ) (TSX: TRQ) is an international mining company whose primary operation is its 66% interest in the Oyu Tolgoi copper-gold-silver mine in southern Mongolia. Follow us on Twitter @TurquoiseHillReForward-looking statements
Certain statements made herein, including statements relating to matters that are not historical facts and statements of the Company's beliefs, intentions and expectations about developments, results and events which will or may occur in the future, constitute "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking information and statements relate to future events or future performance, reflect current expectations or beliefs regarding future events and are typically identified by words such as "anticipate", "could", "should", "expect", "seek", "may", "intend", "likely", "plan", "estimate", "will", "believe" and similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook. These include, but are not limited to, statements respecting anticipated business activities, planned expenditures, corporate strategies and other statements that are not historical facts.Forward-looking statements and information are made based upon certain assumptions and other important factors that, if untrue, could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements or information. There can be no assurances that such statements or information will prove accurate. Such statements and information contained herein represent the Company's best judgment as of the date hereof based on information currently available. The Company does not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements or information or to conform these forward-looking statements or information to actual results, except as required by law. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements and information are included in the "Risk Factors" section of the Annual Information Form dated as of March 15, 2016 in respect of the year ended December 31, 2015.
Contact
Investors and Media
Tony Shaffer
Office: 1 604 648 3934
Email: [email protected]



Read more...
Turquoise Hill Announces Oyu Tolgoi Notice to Proceed and 2016 Feasibility Study Approved
VANCOUVER, BC--(Marketwired - May 06, 2016) - Turquoise Hill Resources today announced that Oyu Tolgoi has received the formal notice to proceed approval by the boards of Turquoise Hill, Rio Tinto and Oyu Tolgoi LLC respectively, which was the final requirement for the re-start of underground development. As part of that process, the 2016 Oyu Tolgoi Feasibility Study (the "2016 Feasibility Study") has been completed. Underground construction is expected to begin in mid-2016. All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated. Jeff Tygesen, Turquoise Hill Chief Executive Officer, said, "Today is a historic milestone and a significant achievement toward realizing Oyu Tolgoi's full value. Given the early works that began in the second half of 2015, the underground team is well positioned for a smooth construction restart around the middle of this year. I think Oyu Tolgoi is the best copper opportunity in development today and an excellent growth project for our shareholders, Mongolia and Oyu Tolgoi's workforce."Due to declines in copper grades globally, we expect a supply deficit starting in approximately 2019. Oyu Tolgoi's expected first underground production in 2021 fits in very well with the anticipated supply short fall. Approximately 80% of Oyu Tolgoi's value resides in the underground because the copper grades are roughly three and a half times higher than the open pit."Subject to the completion of certain conditions precedent, the full $4.4 billion project finance facility, signed in December 2015, will be drawn down. The draw down is expected to be complete by June 2016. Net proceeds from the project finance facility (the "Net PF Proceeds"), after fees and taxes, are expected to be approximately $4.1 billion. The Net PF Proceeds will initially be used by Oyu Tolgoi to pay down shareholder loans payable to Turquoise Hill. The Net PF Proceeds will then be available to be re-drawn by Oyu Tolgoi as required for the development of the underground mine. As part of the project finance facility, a debt cap of $6.0 billion for Oyu Tolgoi was agreed, which provides the possibility for an additional $1.6 billion of supplemental debt in the future.Following the filing of revised schedules for the statutory feasibility study with the Mongolian Minerals Council in August 2015, pre-start activities began in parallel with an update to the capital estimate, which was completed in Q1'16. Pre-start activities include ramp-up of the owners and engineering, procurement and construction management teams, re-estimate activities, detailed engineering and early procurement for equipment and materials required for necessary critical works that are key enablers for recommencement of underground lateral development mining activity. Appointments to key roles in the underground team are well underway, with key staff starting in Q1'16. Feasibility Study
The 2016 Feasibility Study is based on Oyu Tolgoi reserves. The 2016 Reserve Case includes mineral reserves from the Southern Oyu Tolgoi open pit and the Hugo North Lift 1 block cave. Turquoise Hill expects to publish an updated National Instrument 43-101 compliant independent technical report relating to the project in the second half of 2016.Highlights of the 2016 Feasibility Study are as follows.
After-tax internal rate of return of 18% (NPV8% of $4.6 billion) assuming long-term copper and gold prices of $2.86 per pound and $1,201 per ounce respectively. With the exception of depletion from ongoing operations, there have been no material changes to the mineral reserve and resource estimates included in the 2014 Oyu Tolgoi Technical Report ("2014 Technical Report"). Nominal expansion capital of $5.3 billion ($5.1 billion 2016 real costs) for the underground project, which is broadly in-line with the $4.9 billion estimate (2014 real costs) contained in the 2014 Technical Report. Project assumes a five-year construction period, first underground production around 2021 and five to seven-year ramp up period. Underground mine targeted full production remains at 95,000 tonnes per day. The concentrator rate is planned at 40 million tonnes per annum. Additional details on capital expenditure for the total project capital costs between 2016 and 2054 in the Reserve Case are outlined below. Cash flow from underground operations is expected to begin with first production in 2021.

 


($ in billions)



Item

 

Expansion

 

Sustaining

 

Total




Direct Costs

 
 
 
 
 
 


 
Open Pit
 
-
 
1.6
 
1.6


 
Underground
 
2.4
 
3.1
 
5.5


 
Concentrator
 
0.2
 
0.2
 
0.4


 
Infrastructure
 
0.4
 
0.2
 
0.6


 
Tailings Storage Facility
 
-
 
0.9
 
0.9


Subtotal
 


3.0
 


6.0
 


9.0


Construction Indirect
 


0.9
 


-
 


0.9


Subtotal
 


3.9
 


6.0
 


9.9



Contractor Execution

 
 
 
 
 
 


 
EPCM
 
0.4
 
-
 
0.4


Subtotal
 


4.3
 


6.0
 


10.3



Owner Execution

 
 
 
 
 
 


 
O&M, Commissioning, Owners Team
 
0.5
 
0.2
 
0.7


Subtotal
 


4.8
 


6.2
 


11.0



GOM Fees and Charges

 
 
 
 
 
 


 
Mongolian VAT and Duties
 
0.3
 
0.7
 
1.0



Total Development Program

 



5.1

 



6.9

 



12.0




Escalation to Nominal

 



0.2

 
 
 
 



Nominal Project Cost

 



5.3

 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The 2016 Feasibility Study estimate classifies separately indirect costs that were previously included in the 2014 Technical Report as construction allowances, such as camp accommodation, food services and domestic air travel from Ulaanbaatar to Oyu Tolgoi. About Turquoise Hill Resources
Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE: TRQ)(NASDAQ: TRQ)(TSX: TRQ) is an international mining company whose primary operation is its 66% interest in the Oyu Tolgoi copper-gold-silver mine in southern Mongolia. Forward-looking statements
Certain statements made herein, including statements relating to matters that are not historical facts and statements of the Company's beliefs, intentions and expectations about developments, results and events which will or may occur in the future, constitute "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking information and statements relate to future events or future performance, reflect current expectations or beliefs regarding future events and are typically identified by words such as "anticipate", "could", "should", "expect", "seek", "may", "intend", "likely", "plan", "estimate", "will", "believe" and similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook. These include, but are not limited to, statements respecting anticipated business activities, planned expenditures, corporate strategies and other statements that are not historical facts.Forward-looking statements and information are made based upon certain assumptions and other important factors that, if untrue, could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements or information. There can be no assurances that such statements or information will prove accurate. Such statements and information contained herein represent the Company's best judgment as of the date hereof based on information currently available. The Company does not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements or information or to conform these forward-looking statements or information to actual results, except as required by law. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements and information are included in the "Risk Factors" section of the Annual Information Form dated as of March 15, 2016 in respect of the year ended December 31, 2015.Follow us on Twitter @TurquoiseHillRe
Contact


Investors and Media


Tony Shaffer
Office: 1 604 648 3934

Email: [email protected]




Read more...
Turquoise Hill Announces Results of Voting for the Election of Directors
VANCOUVER, BC--(Marketwired - May 04, 2016) - Turquoise Hill Resources today announced that the nominees set forth in the company's management proxy circular dated March 15, 2016 were elected as directors of Turquoise Hill Resources. The detailed results of the vote for the election of directors held at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which took place on May 3, 2016 in Vancouver, are set out below.
Election of Directors

According to votes received, each of the following seven nominees proposed by management were elected as a director of Turquoise Hill Resources until the next annual shareholder meeting, or until such person's successor is elected or appointed, with the following results:

 
 
 
 
 



Name of Nominee


Votes For


% For


Votes Withheld


% Withheld



Rowena Albones
1,749,149,268
98.56%
25,627,988
1.44%


Jill Gardiner
1,771,072,446
99.79%
3,704,810
0.21%


James W. Gill
1,771,183,867
99.80%
3,593,389
0.20%


R. Peter Gillin
1,752,285,511
98.73%
22,491,745
1.27%


Russel C. Robertson
1,771,003,812
99.79%
3,773,444
0.21%


Craig Stegman
1,769,669,052
99.71%
5,108,204
0.29%


Jeffery Tygesen
1,769,616,342
99.71%
5,160,914
0.29%


 
 
 
 
 

Final results on all matters voted on at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be filed on SEDAR. About Turquoise Hill Resources
Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE: TRQ) (NASDAQ: TRQ) (TSX: TRQ) is an international mining company whose primary operation is its 66% interest in the Oyu Tolgoi copper-gold-silver mine in southern Mongolia.
Contact
Investors and Media
Tony Shaffer
Office:  1 604 648 3934
Email: [email protected]




Read more...
Turquoise Hill to Announce First Quarter Financial Results on May 5, 2016
VANCOUVER, BC--(Marketwired - April 28, 2016) - Turquoise Hill Resources will announce its first quarter financial results on Thursday, May 5, 2016 after markets close in North America. The Company will host a conference call and webcast to discuss first quarter results on Friday, May 6, 2016 at 11:00 am EDT / 8:00 am PDT. The conference call can be accessed through the following dial-in details: North America: 416 340 8018 | 866 225 9256
International: 1 416 340 8018
The conference call will also be simultaneously webcast on Turquoise Hill's website at www.turquoisehill.com. An archived playback of the call will be available on the Company's website. About Turquoise Hill Resources
Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE: TRQ)(NASDAQ: TRQ)(TSX: TRQ) is an international mining company whose primary operation is its 66% interest in the Oyu Tolgoi copper-gold-silver mine in southern Mongolia. Follow us on Twitter @TurquoiseHillRe
Investors and Media


Tony Shaffer
Office: 1 604 648 3934
Email: [email protected]



Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 30.30
TRQ's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
65% of the 450 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 19.78 vs. TRQ: 30.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
TRQ' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.78  Med: 34.05 Max: 257.5
Current: 30.3
12.78
257.5
PE Ratio without NRI 30.30
TRQ's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
64% of the 443 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 20.29 vs. TRQ: 30.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
TRQ' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12  Med: 26.45 Max: 89.65
Current: 30.3
12
89.65
PB Ratio 0.62
TRQ's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 1388 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 2.03 vs. TRQ: 0.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
TRQ' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 1.08 Max: 20.07
Current: 0.62
0.44
20.07
PS Ratio 4.64
TRQ's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
78% of the 672 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 1.84 vs. TRQ: 4.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
TRQ' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.42  Med: 44.87 Max: 696.25
Current: 4.64
2.42
696.25
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 24.25
TRQ's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
86% of the 385 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 8.68 vs. TRQ: 24.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
TRQ' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.26  Med: 10.06 Max: 38.09
Current: 24.25
6.26
38.09
EV-to-EBIT 74.43
TRQ's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
90% of the 904 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 20.02 vs. TRQ: 74.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
TRQ' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2927  Med: -17.2 Max: 244.6
Current: 74.43
-2927
244.6
EV-to-EBITDA 21.55
TRQ's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
77% of the 971 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 10.14 vs. TRQ: 21.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
TRQ' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -61.5  Med: -15 Max: 423.5
Current: 21.55
-61.5
423.5
Current Ratio 9.39
TRQ's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
80% of the 1502 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 2.17 vs. TRQ: 9.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
TRQ' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 2.31 Max: 29.89
Current: 9.39
0.34
29.89
Quick Ratio 8.49
TRQ's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
80% of the 1502 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 1.71 vs. TRQ: 8.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
TRQ' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 1.79 Max: 29.89
Current: 8.49
0.04
29.89
Days Inventory 122.77
TRQ's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
74% of the 606 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 76.92 vs. TRQ: 122.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
TRQ' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.77  Med: 124.17 Max: 1045.87
Current: 122.77
4.77
1045.87
Days Sales Outstanding 314.88
TRQ's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
96% of the 600 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 36.83 vs. TRQ: 314.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
TRQ' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.66  Med: 96 Max: 5548.56
Current: 314.88
2.66
5548.56

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -26.00
TRQ's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 1131 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -12.90 vs. TRQ: -26.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
TRQ' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -52.7  Med: -15.55 Max: -2.3
Current: -26
-52.7
-2.3

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.63
TRQ's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
87% of the 1342 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 2.29 vs. TRQ: 0.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
TRQ' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 2.26 Max: 16.14
Current: 0.63
0.22
16.14
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.10
TRQ's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
97% of the 518 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. TRQ: 0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
TRQ' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.51 Max: 48.82
Current: 0.1
0.05
48.82
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.92
TRQ's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
66% of the 368 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 1.43 vs. TRQ: 0.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
TRQ' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 1.03 Max: 1.18
Current: 0.92
0.64
1.18
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 1.37
TRQ's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
55% of the 1748 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -0.10 vs. TRQ: 1.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
TRQ' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 2.5 Max: 7.9
Current: 1.37
0.4
7.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,203
EPS (TTM) $ 0.09
Beta1.46
Short Percentage of Float0.77%
52-Week Range $2.57 - 3.80
Shares Outstanding (Mil)2,012.31

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 881 1,008 1,329
EPS ($) -0.12 -0.09 0.07
EPS without NRI ($) -0.12 -0.09 0.07
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for TRQ

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Turquoise Hill Provides Update on Progress Toward Underground Construction Jun 07 2016 
Turquoise Hill Announces Oyu Tolgoi Notice to Proceed and 2016 Feasibility Study Approved May 06 2016 
Turquoise Hill Announces Results of Voting for the Election of Directors May 04 2016 
Turquoise Hill to Announce First Quarter Financial Results on May 5, 2016 Apr 28 2016 
Turquoise Hill Announces First Quarter 2016 Production Apr 19 2016 
Prem Watsa's 5 Largest New Buys Feb 12 2016 
Freeport McMoran Has Good Long-Term Prospects Dec 15 2014 
Arnold Van Den Berg's Gold Miners Rally Jun 20 2014 
Off 64% or More – Three Stocks on a 52-Week Low, Held by Gurus Dec 28 2013 
Sector Highlights - Three Stocks Held by Billionaires Oct 05 2013 

More From Other Websites
Teck Resources’ 1Q17 Earnings: Everything You Need to Know Apr 26 2017
Turquoise Hill announces first quarter 2017 production Apr 19 2017
Bracing for Freeport’s 1Q17 Results: The Fear of a Third Consecutive Miss Apr 18 2017
ETFs with exposure to Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. : April 17, 2017 Apr 17 2017
Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. :TRQ-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : March 31, 2017 Mar 31 2017
Turquoise Hill posts 4Q profit Mar 27 2017
Turquoise Hill announces financial results and review of operations for 2016 Mar 27 2017
Recent Changes to Rio Tinto’s Earnings Estimates Mar 22 2017
Turquoise Hill to announce fourth quarter and full year 2016 financial results on March 27, 2017 Mar 20 2017
A Comparative Analysis of Copper Miners’ Leverage Ratios Mar 17 2017
Freeport or Glencore: Which Company Looks Set for 2017? Mar 16 2017
Turquoise Hill announces retirement of CFO Feb 27 2017
Freeport-McMoRan’s Management: Its Litmus Test for 2017 Feb 16 2017
Freeport-McMoRan’s Outlook: What’s Making the Markets Jittery? Feb 15 2017
Freeport-McMoRan’s Indonesian Export Permit: What You Should Know Feb 15 2017
Why the Grasberg Mine Is Crucial to Freeport’s 2017 Plans Feb 06 2017
What’s the Biggest Risk to Freeport’s 2017 Guidance? Feb 02 2017
Why Grasberg Issues Dominated Freeport’s 4Q16 Earnings Call Jan 27 2017
Do Analysts See Value in Turquoise Hill Resources? Jan 25 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)