Switch to:
Also traded in: Canada, Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.36
NYSE:TRQ's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
73% of the 1510 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 22.65 vs. NYSE:TRQ: 0.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
NYSE:TRQ' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 1.64 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.36
Equity to Asset 0.70
NYSE:TRQ's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
67% of the 720 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 0.59 vs. NYSE:TRQ: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
NYSE:TRQ' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.74 Max: 1.03
Current: 0.7
0.31
1.03
Interest Coverage 4.89
NYSE:TRQ's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
84% of the 969 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 10000.00 vs. NYSE:TRQ: 4.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:TRQ' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.89  Med: 41.18 Max: No Debt
Current: 4.89
F-Score: 6
Z-Score: 0.91
M-Score: 28.73
WACC vs ROIC
14.70%
2.56%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 9.65
NYSE:TRQ's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
77% of the 768 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -0.73 vs. NYSE:TRQ: 9.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
NYSE:TRQ' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9694.95  Med: -495.2 Max: 11.63
Current: 9.65
-9694.95
11.63
Net-margin (%) 22.42
NYSE:TRQ's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 770 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -2.41 vs. NYSE:TRQ: 22.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
NYSE:TRQ' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5889.73  Med: -357.29 Max: 22.42
Current: 22.42
-5889.73
22.42
ROE (%) 4.12
NYSE:TRQ's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
82% of the 1382 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -11.76 vs. NYSE:TRQ: 4.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
NYSE:TRQ' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -91.31  Med: -18.21 Max: 4.12
Current: 4.12
-91.31
4.12
ROA (%) 3.87
NYSE:TRQ's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
86% of the 1532 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -9.33 vs. NYSE:TRQ: 3.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
NYSE:TRQ' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -68.35  Med: -10.7 Max: 4.12
Current: 3.87
-68.35
4.12
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 2.48
NYSE:TRQ's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
76% of the 1461 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -13.04 vs. NYSE:TRQ: 2.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
NYSE:TRQ' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -277.2  Med: -22.21 Max: 2.48
Current: 2.48
-277.2
2.48
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 151.50
NYSE:TRQ's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
99% of the 631 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -3.90 vs. NYSE:TRQ: 151.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NYSE:TRQ' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.7 Max: 750.9
Current: 151.5
0
750.9
» NYSE:TRQ's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-11-06)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2015

TRQ Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jim Simons 419,738 sh (+138.76%)
Paul Tudor Jones 25,352 sh (+134.74%)
Ray Dalio 519,300 sh (+6.13%)
Joel Greenblatt 32,355 sh (-0.03%)
» More
Q4 2015

TRQ Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Prem Watsa 1,150,400 sh (New)
Jim Simons 944,638 sh (+125.05%)
Paul Tudor Jones 25,352 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt 32,338 sh (-0.05%)
Ray Dalio 506,700 sh (-2.43%)
» More
Q1 2016

TRQ Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Ray Dalio 605,000 sh (+19.40%)
Prem Watsa 1,150,400 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt 32,332 sh (-0.02%)
Paul Tudor Jones 21,614 sh (-14.74%)
Jim Simons 416,338 sh (-55.93%)
» More
Q2 2016

TRQ Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Steven Cohen 1,138,500 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 617,100 sh (+2.00%)
Prem Watsa 1,150,400 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones 21,276 sh (-1.56%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with TRQ

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Metals & Mining » Copper
Compare:OTCPK:FQVLF, OTCPK:LUNMF, OTCPK:OZMLF, AMEX:NSU, NYSE:HBM, OTCPK:SYAAF, OTCPK:MLXEF, OTCPK:OROCF, OTCPK:IPMLF, OTCPK:CSFFF, OTCPK:GPHYF, OTCPK:TASEF, OTCPK:AZRMF, OTCPK:CPPMF, OTCPK:NEVDF, OTCPK:CPFXF, OTCPK:PKREF, OTCPK:ARREF, OTCPK:TVIPF, OTCPK:ATBHF » details
Traded in other countries:TRQ.Canada, IHM.Germany,
Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd is a mining company engaged in the operation and further development of the Oyu Tolgoi copper-gold mine in southern Mongolia, which is the Company's principal and only material mineral resource property.

Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd was incorporated under the Company Act (British Columbia) on January 25, 1994 under the name 463212 B.C. Ltd. The Company is a mining company engaged in the operation and further development of the Oyu Tolgoi copper-gold mine in southern Mongolia, which is the Company's principal and only material mineral resource property. The Oyu Tolgoi copper and gold project (Oyu Tolgoi) is located in the Southern Gobi region of Mongolia and is being developed by Oyu Tolgoi LLC. The Company has one operating segment, Oyu Tolgoi with its copper-gold mine in southern Mongolia. The Company's mining operations and exploration activities are subject to extensive laws and regulations.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 17.30
TRQ's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
55% of the 390 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 19.73 vs. TRQ: 17.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
TRQ' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.16  Med: 50.6 Max: 4872.96
Current: 17.3
12.16
4872.96
PE(NRI) 16.59
TRQ's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
56% of the 389 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 19.73 vs. TRQ: 16.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
TRQ' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.75  Med: 28.53 Max: 1035.42
Current: 16.59
12.75
1035.42
P/B 0.72
TRQ's P/B is ranked higher than
82% of the 1323 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 1.99 vs. TRQ: 0.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
TRQ' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 3.18 Max: 20.02
Current: 0.72
0.44
20.02
P/S 3.93
TRQ's P/S is ranked lower than
70% of the 679 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 1.80 vs. TRQ: 3.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
TRQ' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.42  Med: 126.14 Max: 696.25
Current: 3.93
2.42
696.25
PFCF 16.65
TRQ's PFCF is ranked lower than
56% of the 220 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 14.49 vs. TRQ: 16.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
TRQ' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.07  Med: 10.61 Max: 19.46
Current: 16.65
7.07
19.46
POCF 11.43
TRQ's POCF is ranked lower than
62% of the 384 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 8.47 vs. TRQ: 11.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
TRQ' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.24  Med: 8.75 Max: 32.93
Current: 11.43
6.24
32.93
EV-to-EBIT 48.84
TRQ's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
80% of the 405 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 18.52 vs. TRQ: 48.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
TRQ' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2960.3  Med: -17 Max: 164.8
Current: 48.84
-2960.3
164.8
EV-to-EBITDA 18.03
TRQ's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
64% of the 461 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 11.53 vs. TRQ: 18.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
TRQ' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -374.6  Med: -16.15 Max: 50103.7
Current: 18.03
-374.6
50103.7
Current Ratio 8.51
TRQ's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 1463 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 1.86 vs. TRQ: 8.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
TRQ' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.32  Med: 3.1 Max: 104.81
Current: 8.51
0.32
104.81
Quick Ratio 7.52
TRQ's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
80% of the 1462 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 1.43 vs. TRQ: 7.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
TRQ' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 2.91 Max: 104.81
Current: 7.52
0.07
104.81
Days Inventory 123.35
TRQ's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
75% of the 633 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 73.43 vs. TRQ: 123.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
TRQ' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.77  Med: 78.61 Max: 4268.82
Current: 123.35
4.77
4268.82
Days Sales Outstanding 158.02
TRQ's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
89% of the 599 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 32.93 vs. TRQ: 158.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
TRQ' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.54  Med: 83.15 Max: 5548.56
Current: 158.02
3.54
5548.56

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -15.70
TRQ's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
58% of the 1057 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -11.60 vs. TRQ: -15.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
TRQ' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -52.7  Med: -15.5 Max: -2.3
Current: -15.7
-52.7
-2.3

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.72
TRQ's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
84% of the 1290 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 2.21 vs. TRQ: 0.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
TRQ' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 2.27 Max: 20.04
Current: 0.72
0.21
20.04
Price/Median PS Value 0.03
TRQ's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
98% of the 581 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. TRQ: 0.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
TRQ' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.29 Max: 18.04
Current: 0.03
0.02
18.04
Price/Graham Number 0.72
TRQ's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
77% of the 315 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: 1.45 vs. TRQ: 0.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
TRQ' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.09 Max: 4.62
Current: 0.72
0.58
4.62
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 2.02
TRQ's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
79% of the 1507 Companies
in the Global Copper industry.

( Industry Median: -4.90 vs. TRQ: 2.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
TRQ' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 3.2 Max: 8.8
Current: 2.02
0.6
8.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,540
EPS (TTM) $ 0.17
Beta1.13
Short Percentage of Float1.33%
52-Week Range $1.55 - 3.67
Shares Outstanding (Mil)2,012.31

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 1,533 1,013 1,374 2,603
EPS ($) -0.02 -0.21 -0.15 0.30
EPS w/o NRI ($) -0.02 -0.21 -0.15 0.30
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends Per Share ($)
» More Articles for NYSE:TRQ

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Prem Watsa's 5 Largest New Buys Feb 12 2016 
Freeport McMoran Has Good Long-Term Prospects Dec 15 2014 
Arnold Van Den Berg's Gold Miners Rally Jun 20 2014 
Off 64% or More – Three Stocks on a 52-Week Low, Held by Gurus Dec 28 2013 
Sector Highlights - Three Stocks Held by Billionaires Oct 05 2013 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: APA, AU, TRQ, CLF Feb 19 2013 

More From Other Websites
Global Copper Inventory Stabilizes, Supports Prices Sep 23 2016
Copper Supply: Production Fell in Chile and Rose in China Sep 23 2016
Turquoise Hill announces disposal of shares of SouthGobi Resources Sep 22 2016
Turquoise Hill Announces Disposal of Shares of SouthGobi Resources Sep 22 2016
How Do Chinese Copper Demand Indicators Look This Month? Sep 22 2016
What Do Sagging Copper Prices Mean for Freeport-McMoRan? Sep 22 2016
Why You Can’t Compare FCX’s Energy Assets to Its Copper Assets Sep 19 2016
Why Copper Prices May Be Subdued for the Rest of the Year Sep 13 2016
Credit Suisse, September 2016 Sep 12 2016
Chinese Copper Imports Impact the Global Inventory Sep 08 2016
What China’s Falling Copper Imports Mean for Freeport-McMoRan Sep 08 2016
What Caught the Attention of Analysts Evaluating Vale SA? Sep 08 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. : September 8, 2016 Sep 08 2016
Overexposure to Iron Ore Pressures This Key Fundamental for RIO Sep 08 2016
How Are Analysts Rating Turquoise Hill Resources This Month? Sep 02 2016
Wall Street Maintains ‘Status Quo’ on Freeport-McMoRan Sep 02 2016
Mongolia to Rio Tinto: Hurry Up with Oyu Tolgoi! Aug 31 2016
Why Analysts Expect Freeport-McMoRan’s Earnings to Rise in 2H16 Aug 24 2016
Can Freeport-McMoRan Continue to Surprise Analysts in 2016? Aug 23 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Turquoise Hill Resources Ltd. : August 19, 2016 Aug 19 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)