Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.49
TRW's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
66% of the 1246 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. TRW: 0.49 )
TRW' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.09   Max: No Debt
Current: 0.49

Equity to Asset 0.35
TRW's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
52% of the 1248 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.45 vs. TRW: 0.35 )
TRW' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.07   Max: 0.35
Current: 0.35

0.07
0.35
Interest Coverage 9.30
TRW's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
60% of the 839 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 18.27 vs. TRW: 9.30 )
TRW' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 1.27   Max: 9999.99
Current: 9.3

1.27
9999.99
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 3.00
M-Score: -2.48
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 7.21
TRW's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
77% of the 1255 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 5.91 vs. TRW: 7.21 )
TRW' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -3.12   Max: 8.23
Current: 7.21

-3.12
8.23
Net-margin (%) 5.77
TRW's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
77% of the 1255 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 4.64 vs. TRW: 5.77 )
TRW' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -5.2   Max: 7.12
Current: 5.77

-5.2
7.12
ROE (%) 25.79
TRW's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
96% of the 1246 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 10.16 vs. TRW: 25.79 )
TRW' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -36.04   Max: 51.75
Current: 25.79

-36.04
51.75
ROA (%) 8.52
TRW's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
88% of the 1259 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 4.61 vs. TRW: 8.52 )
TRW' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -7.23   Max: 11.84
Current: 8.52

-7.23
11.84
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 45.34
TRW's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
96% of the 1259 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 14.93 vs. TRW: 45.34 )
TRW' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -17.24   Max: 59.48
Current: 45.34

-17.24
59.48
Revenue Growth (%) 8.50
TRW's Revenue Growth (%) is ranked higher than
77% of the 1064 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 7.10 vs. TRW: 8.50 )
TRW' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (%) Range
Min: 0   Max: 8.5
Current: 8.5

0
8.5
EBITDA Growth (%) 2.00
TRW's EBITDA Growth (%) is ranked higher than
66% of the 967 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 5.90 vs. TRW: 2.00 )
TRW' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (%) Range
Min: 0   Max: 121.2
Current: 2

0
121.2
EPS Growth (%) 7.00
TRW's EPS Growth (%) is ranked higher than
73% of the 895 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 6.70 vs. TRW: 7.00 )
TRW' s 10-Year EPS Growth (%) Range
Min: 0   Max: 147.9
Current: 7

0
147.9
» TRW's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2013

TRW Guru Trades in Q3 2013

Ken Heebner 1,215,000 sh (New)
Richard Pzena 2,985,869 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 157,700 sh (+29.82%)
Steven Cohen 269,392 sh (+12.71%)
Jim Simons 440,500 sh (+1.31%)
Ken Fisher 58,940 sh (+0.07%)
Richard Snow 170,564 sh (-0.28%)
RS Investment Management 787,634 sh (-1.65%)
Jeremy Grantham 48,466 sh (-9.07%)
John Hussman 350,000 sh (-30%)
Charles Brandes 87,062 sh (-32.99%)
Joel Greenblatt 9,042 sh (-43.66%)
» More
Q4 2013

TRW Guru Trades in Q4 2013

Joel Greenblatt 13,427 sh (+48.5%)
Paul Tudor Jones 178,600 sh (+13.25%)
Charles Brandes 89,158 sh (+2.41%)
Richard Pzena 3,050,149 sh (+2.15%)
Ken Heebner Sold Out
Ken Fisher 58,900 sh (-0.07%)
RS Investment Management 783,020 sh (-0.59%)
Jeremy Grantham 47,153 sh (-2.71%)
Richard Snow 135,105 sh (-20.79%)
Jim Simons 193,900 sh (-55.98%)
John Hussman 100,000 sh (-71.43%)
Steven Cohen 39,141 sh (-85.47%)
» More
Q1 2014

TRW Guru Trades in Q1 2014

Ray Dalio 8,700 sh (New)
Ken Heebner 220,000 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 154,161 sh (+1048.14%)
Steven Cohen 95,767 sh (+144.67%)
Jim Simons 355,664 sh (+83.43%)
Richard Pzena 3,624,742 sh (+18.84%)
John Hussman 100,000 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Charles Brandes Sold Out
Ken Fisher 55,292 sh (-6.13%)
RS Investment Management 733,989 sh (-6.26%)
Richard Snow 93,075 sh (-31.11%)
Paul Tudor Jones 113,049 sh (-36.7%)
» More
Q2 2014

TRW Guru Trades in Q2 2014

Robert Olstein 23,800 sh (New)
Richard Snow 128,325 sh (+37.87%)
Richard Pzena 3,944,455 sh (+8.82%)
Steven Cohen 40,000 sh (unchged)
John Hussman 100,000 sh (unchged)
Ken Heebner Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
RS Investment Management 549,267 sh (-25.17%)
Ken Fisher 37,717 sh (-31.79%)
Paul Tudor Jones 73,237 sh (-35.22%)
Jim Simons 130,700 sh (-63.25%)
Joel Greenblatt 5,879 sh (-96.19%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with TRW

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Ken Heebner 2014-06-30 Sold Out 0.48%$78.53 - $89.19 $ 100.7521%0
Robert Olstein 2014-06-30 New Buy0.29%$78.53 - $89.19 $ 100.7521%23800
Joel Greenblatt 2014-06-30 Reduce -96.19%0.18%$78.53 - $89.19 $ 100.7521%5879
Richard Pzena 2014-06-30 Add 8.82%0.16%$78.53 - $89.19 $ 100.7521%3944455
Richard Snow 2014-06-30 Add 37.87%0.11%$78.53 - $89.19 $ 100.7521%128325
Ray Dalio 2014-06-30 Sold Out 0.01%$78.53 - $89.19 $ 100.7521%0
Ken Fisher 2014-06-30 Reduce -31.79%$78.53 - $89.19 $ 100.7521%37717
Ken Heebner 2014-03-31 New Buy0.48%$70.27 - $83.78 $ 100.7530%220000
Richard Pzena 2014-03-31 Add 18.84%0.27%$70.27 - $83.78 $ 100.7530%3624742
Joel Greenblatt 2014-03-31 Add 1048.14%0.17%$70.27 - $83.78 $ 100.7530%154161
Richard Snow 2014-03-31 Reduce -31.11%0.13%$70.27 - $83.78 $ 100.7530%93075
Charles Brandes 2014-03-31 Sold Out 0.08%$70.27 - $83.78 $ 100.7530%0
Ray Dalio 2014-03-31 New Buy0.01%$70.27 - $83.78 $ 100.7530%8700
Ken Heebner 2013-12-31 Sold Out 2.3%$71.32 - $79.16 $ 100.7534%0
John Hussman 2013-12-31 Reduce -71.43%1%$71.32 - $79.16 $ 100.7534%100000
Richard Snow 2013-12-31 Reduce -20.79%0.11%$71.32 - $79.16 $ 100.7534%135105
Joel Greenblatt 2013-12-31 Add 48.5%0.01%$71.32 - $79.16 $ 100.7534%13427
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on TRW Automotive Holdings Corp

Bill Nygren Comments on TRW Automotive Holdings Corp - Oct 07, 2014

On the morning of September 15, TRW Automotive Holdings (TRW) announced it was going to be acquired by ZF Friedrichshafen for $105.60 per share. This was of more than a passing interest to us because at the time TRW was the largest holding in Oakmark Select. It was also the culmination of a process we applauded because TRW stock began 2012 at $33 per share, and was only up to $74 at the end of 2013. Over the years, takeovers have contributed significantly to Oakmark and Oakmark Select’s returns. In 2014 both Funds benefited when AT&T offered to buy DirecTV and when Actavis purchased Forest Laboratories. Additionally, Oakmark Fund owned Covidien, which increased from $72 to $92 after announcing its merger with Medtronic. Obviously, we welcome takeover activity in any of our holdings.

But when TRW announced news of the acquisition at 8:16 a.m. Chicago time, it took less than an hour – 9:04 to be exact – for the first law firm to announce its threat to sue TRW for accepting too low a price. Within 10 days I had counted at least 27 similar press releases from various law firms purporting to represent shareholders, threatening legal action to block the takeover. How do you square the law firms all jumping in to protect the shareholders while as a large shareholder ourselves, we were cheering the news?

Merger objection lawsuits aren’t unique to the TRW deal. In fact, each of the takeovers we were invested in had multiple law firms trying to block the deals, alleging that shareholders weren’t getting paid a high enough price. And it isn’t just those takeovers. Within minutes of almost any takeover announcement, many law firms race to file press releases. Ten years ago, less than 10% of announced acquisitions of public companies were followed by merger objection suits. Today, almost every deal produces multiple suits. The overwhelming majority of these suits result in zero benefit to the shareholders, but almost all result in payments to law firms. Effectively, these suits have now become just another unfortunate cost of doing business.

Though we believe these suits are mostly frivolous, it is definitely worth recognizing that executives of selling companies may be conflicted and in a position to capture benefits for themselves that don’t get passed through to other shareholders. Those may include higher-than-market compensation, job security for redundant positions, or a slew of perks that make their new jobs more rewarding. So I’d like to take the opportunity to discuss how we at Oakmark analyze acquisition proposals.

When we first purchased TRW in late 2011, our belief was that the stock was worth about $63. We developed that estimate of value in several ways. We looked at acquisition prices of other industrial businesses. We looked at the value of discounted cash flows based on our estimate of future earnings. And we looked at historical stock market valuations for businesses that had similar fundamental characteristics. It is a process we use for all companies we purchase, and it attempts to get us into the right ballpark for estimating value. It is definitely not an exercise in precision – when we say we estimate value at $63, it really means we believe the right range is something like $57 to $70. We would mock any of our analysts who tried to show precision to the right of the decimal point; we believe that if we are within 10% we are doing a good job. We simply don’t believe you can get more accurate based on public data. But fortunately, lack of precision was no problem with TRW because at the time we purchased it the stock traded at $32.

During the ensuing three years, TRW earned about $20 per share cumulatively and used some of that capital to buy back undervalued stock. Over that time our forecast of future earnings grew. By last month our best estimate of value had grown to $109. The acquisition price of $105.60 was a little bit below our best guess, but well within 10%. That left us with two important questions: Was the bidding process open to other interested buyers? Were the board and management incentivized to achieve the maximum price?

Let’s take the second question first. Did the management own enough stock and options that they were beneficiaries of a higher price? This is a question that is important to us not just when a company is getting acquired, but throughout our term of ownership. We believe it is too much to expect that people will act against their own economic interests, so we like to see management do well when their shareholders also do well. Fortunately, their incentives are easily quantifiable because the information is readily available in the proxy statement and 10K. As of year-end, management and directors owned or held rights to purchase over $500 million of TRW stock, valued at the acquisition price. Each dollar by which they could increase the price benefited them by just over $5 million. Clearly, by acting in their own economic interest, they were also acting in the interest of all the shareholders.

Finally, was it an open process? Again, the publicly available filings help answer this question. Any time a public company is acquired it is required to make a filing that details how potential buyers were identified and that discloses what took place during negotiations, including whether or not other offers were received. That document for TRW is not available yet, but will be by the time you read this letter. But here’s what we know so far. On the morning of July 10 Bloomberg reported that ZF was considering purchasing TRW for $11 billion to $12 billion ($95 - $103 per share). Within a couple of hours of that report TRW publicly confirmed the rumor; it had received a bid but did not disclose the price or the suitor. TRW said it was “evaluating the bid as well as other options.” Translating from legalese, this was an open invitation to anyone interested in acquiring the company to come forward. In press releases later that day, ZF was identified as the suitor. Nine weeks later the deal was announced several dollars above the high end of the rumored range. In the interim negotiations, TRW must have had some leverage to extract a few more dollars.

We know that TRW management would have profited handsomely from a higher-priced deal and that any interested parties had nine full weeks to indicate their interest. We conclude that ZF’s offer is highly likely to have been the best available. Despite the price being slightly below our estimate of value, when the facts line up like that, we would always prefer to have the deal accepted. That way, we can sell our stock at a much higher percentage of our value estimate, even if it isn’t quite 100%, and redeploy the funds into stocks that we believe are selling at much larger discounts to our estimate of value. (Note: In the highly unlikely event that the proxy statement discloses that a credible, higher bidder was shut out from the process, our position will change 180 degrees, and we will be vocal. But given the circumstances, I think that is less likely than a snowless winter in Chicago.)

Congratulations on a job well done to TRW Chief Executive Officer John Plant and Chief Financial Officer Joe Cantie. Congratulations also to Mike White of DirecTV, Brent Saunders of Forest Labs, and Joe Almeida of Covidien. Our Funds have benefited tremendously from your stewardship. Speaking on behalf of all our shareholders, thank you!

From Bill Nygren (Trades, Portfolio)'s Third Quarter 2014 Market Commentary.

Check out Bill Nygren latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about TRW Automotive Holdings Corp

Bill Nygren Comments on TRW Automotive Holdings Corp
On the morning of September 15, TRW Automotive Holdings (TRW) announced it was going to be acquired by ZF Friedrichshafen for $105.60 per share. This was of more than a passing interest to us because at the time TRW was the largest holding in Oakmark Select. It was also the culmination of a process we applauded because TRW stock began 2012 at $33 per share, and was only up to $74 at the end of 2013. Over the years, takeovers have contributed significantly to Oakmark and Oakmark Select’s returns. In 2014 both Funds benefited when AT&T offered to buy DirecTV and when Actavis purchased Forest Laboratories. Additionally, Oakmark Fund owned Covidien, which increased from $72 to $92 after announcing its merger with Medtronic. Obviously, we welcome takeover activity in any of our holdings. Read more...
Richard Pzena's Top 5 Quarter Three Buys
Richard Pzena, founder of the $23.4 billion investment management firm Pzena Investment Management, reported buying 13 new stocks in the third quarter. This brought his total holdings number to 130 in a portfolio valued at $15.5 billion, for quarter-over-quarter turnover of 10%. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 11.80
TRW's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
79% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 15.70 vs. TRW: 11.80 )
TRW' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 1.15   Max: 108.18
Current: 11.8

1.15
108.18
P/B 2.58
TRW's P/B is ranked lower than
53% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.46 vs. TRW: 2.58 )
TRW' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.08   Max: 3.63
Current: 2.58

0.08
3.63
P/S 0.69
TRW's P/S is ranked higher than
62% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.63 vs. TRW: 0.69 )
TRW' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.01   Max: 0.72
Current: 0.69

0.01
0.72
PFCF 30.07
TRW's PFCF is ranked higher than
74% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. TRW: 30.07 )
TRW' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 0.76   Max: 312.11
Current: 30.07

0.76
312.11
EV-to-EBIT 9.65
TRW's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
82% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 13.87 vs. TRW: 9.65 )
TRW' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: -5.8   Max: 17.3
Current: 9.65

-5.8
17.3
PEG 1.03
TRW's PEG is ranked higher than
87% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 52.20 vs. TRW: 1.03 )
TRW' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.5   Max: 3.97
Current: 1.03

0.5
3.97
Shiller P/E 23.56
TRW's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
74% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 43.45 vs. TRW: 23.56 )
TRW' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 17   Max: 215.87
Current: 23.56

17
215.87
Current Ratio 1.18
TRW's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
54% of the 1254 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.47 vs. TRW: 1.18 )
TRW' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.96   Max: 1.28
Current: 1.18

0.96
1.28
Quick Ratio 0.94
TRW's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 1254 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. TRW: 0.94 )
TRW' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.76   Max: 1.02
Current: 0.94

0.76
1.02

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 4.91
TRW's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
52% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.74 vs. TRW: 4.91 )
TRW' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 3.07   Max: 19.26
Current: 4.91

3.07
19.26
Price/DCF (Projected) 1.51
TRW's Price/DCF (Projected) is ranked higher than
78% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.84 vs. TRW: 1.51 )
TRW' s 10-Year Price/DCF (Projected) Range
Min: 0.12   Max: 1.65
Current: 1.51

0.12
1.65
Price/Median PS Value 2.98
TRW's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
58% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. TRW: 2.98 )
TRW' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.11   Max: 2.65
Current: 2.98

0.11
2.65
Price/Graham Number 1.52
TRW's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
65% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. TRW: 1.52 )
TRW' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 0.83   Max: 2.75
Current: 1.52

0.83
2.75
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) 10.40
TRW's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) is ranked higher than
77% of the 1124 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.50 vs. TRW: 10.40 )
TRW' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) Range
Min: 5.8   Max: 28.5
Current: 10.4

5.8
28.5
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) 3.14
TRW's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) is ranked higher than
65% of the 991 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 10.05 vs. TRW: 3.14 )
TRW' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) Range
Min: 2.9   Max: 110.8
Current: 3.14

2.9
110.8

Business Description

Industry: Autos » Auto Parts
Compare:WBC, BWA, PTAIY, DNZOY, ALV » details
Traded in other countries:TQT.Germany
TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation is a Delaware corporation formed in 2002. In 2004, the Company has completed its initial public offering. The Company is a supplier of automotive systems, modules and components to global automotive original equipment manufacturers and related aftermarkets. It conducts all of its operations through subsidiaries. These operations mainly encompass the design, manufacture and sale of active and passive safety related products. Active safety related products mainly refer to vehicle dynamic controls primarily braking and steering, and passive safety related products mainly refer to occupant restraints primarily airbags and seat belts, and safety electronics primarily electronic control units and crash and occupant weight sensors. The Company operates its business along four segments: Chassis Systems, Occupant Safety Systems, Electronics and Automotive Components. Chassis Systems segment focuses on the design, manufacture and sale of product lines relating to steering, foundation brakes, modules, brake control, and linkage and suspension. The Company sells its Chassis Systems products primarily to OEMs and other Tier 1 suppliers. It also sells these products to the global aftermarket through both OEM service organizations and independent distribution networks. Occupant Safety Systems segment focuses on the design, manufacture and sale of airbags, seat belts, steering wheels and occupant restraint systems. The Company sells its Occupant Safety Systems products primarily to OEMs and other Tier 1 suppliers. It also sells these products to OEM service organizations. Electronics segment focuses on the design, manufacture and sale of electronics components and systems in the areas of safety, Radio Frequency, chassis, driver assistance and powertrain. The Company sells its Electronics products primarily to OEMs and to its Chassis Systems segment. It also sells these products to OEM service organizations. Automotive Components segment focuses on the design, manufacture and sale of body controls, engine valves, and engineered fasteners and components. The Company sells its Automotive Components products primarily to OEMs and other Tier 1 suppliers, and to certain non-automotive markets and customers. It also sells these products to OEM service organizations. In addition, the Company sells some engine valve and body control products to independent distributors for the automotive aftermarket. The Company purchases various manufactured components and raw materials for use in its manufacturing processes. The principal components and raw materials it purchases include castings, electronic parts, molded plastic parts, finished subcomponents, fabricated metal, aluminum, steel, resins, textiles, leather and wood. The Company's main competitors include Advics, Bosch, Continental-Teves, JTEKT, Nexteer and ZF in the Chassis Systems segment; Autoliv, Takata and Key Safety in the Occupant Safety Systems segment; Autoliv,
» More Articles for TRW

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Bill Nygren Comments on TRW Automotive Holdings Corp Oct 07 2014 
Bill Nygren’s Third Quarter 2014 Market Commentary Oct 07 2014 
Technological Innovation Will Ensure a Profitable Future for This Auto Parts Supplier Apr 18 2014 
An Auto Parts Supplier With a Great Outlook Feb 23 2014 
TRW Continues to Shine in the Auto Parts Industry Jan 04 2014 
Richard Pzena's Top 5 Quarter Three Buys Nov 11 2013 
Why You Should Invest in This Auto Parts Supplier Oct 17 2013 
Weekly CFO Sells Highlight: UNTD, TRW, WWWW, DD Aug 12 2013 
Weekly Top Insider Sells Aug 12 2013 
Weekly CEO Sells Highlight: United Online, Western Refining and TRW Automotive Holdings Aug 11 2013 

More From Our Partners
Strong Results From 2 Leading Auto Suppliers Fails To Move Sector Oct 24 2014 - BENZINGA

More From Other Websites
Germany's ZF eyes two bond issues in H1 2015- Boersen-Zeitung Oct 24 2014
Recall? What Recall? Automakers Will Still Buy Takata's Air Bags Oct 22 2014
Exclusive - Takata engineers struggled to maintain air bag quality, documents reveal Oct 17 2014
TRW Faces Lawsuits for Takeover by ZF; Operations Strong Oct 16 2014
Big Cap Stock Funds Take A Swing At Small Caps Oct 13 2014
Toyota Supplier Considers Japan Expansion as Yen Weakens Oct 07 2014
Robbins Arroyo LLP Announces That it Represents an Investor in Class Action Challenging ZF... Oct 06 2014
The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Autoliv, General Motors, Ford Motor and TRW Automotive Holdings Oct 06 2014
Will Autoliv (ALV) Gain from Change in Operating Structure? Oct 03 2014
Video: Mobileye Cruises On Safe, Self-Driving Cars Sep 30 2014
TRW to Release Third Quarter 2014 Financial Results on October 28, 2014; Schedules Conference Call... Sep 29 2014
Details emerge on 12.5 billion euro loan for ZF's TRW acquisition Sep 26 2014
Investor Lawsuit Against Takeover of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. (TRW) Announced by Shareholders... Sep 24 2014
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Brodsky & Smith, LLC Announces Investigation of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. in... Sep 23 2014
Germany's ZF takeover hunger not sated by TRW buy Sep 23 2014
Germany's ZF takeover hunger not sated by TRW buy Sep 23 2014
TRW Commercial Steering Signs Long Term Agreement With Daimler Trucks North America Sep 23 2014
TRW Unveils Lightweight Torsion Rod at Hanover Truck Show Sep 23 2014
TRW Highlights Commercial Steering Innovations At IAA Commercial Vehicles Show In Hanover Sep 23 2014
TRW Unveils Next Generation Radar Concept Sep 23 2014

Personalized Checklist








Within your circle of competence?
Macro economic environment favorable?
High quality business?
Enough margin of safety with stocks?
Gurus are buying?
Insiders are buying?
Management capable and shareholder friendly?
Catalyst for stock price to appreciate?
Your level of confidence with the research?

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK