Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.02
EEP's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
71% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.06 vs. EEP: 0.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
EEP' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.05 Max: 0.31
Current: 0.02
0.01
0.31
Equity to Asset 0.25
EEP's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
72% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. EEP: 0.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
EEP' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.38 Max: 0.47
Current: 0.25
0.25
0.47
Interest Coverage 1.84
EEP's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
78% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.13 vs. EEP: 1.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
EEP' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46  Med: 2.70 Max: 3.5
Current: 1.84
0.46
3.5
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 0.76
M-Score: -3.74
WACC vs ROIC
8.65%
5.56%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 14.86
EEP's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
52% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 15.56 vs. EEP: 14.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
EEP' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.65  Med: 8.48 Max: 13.64
Current: 14.86
1.65
13.64
Net-margin (%) 1.50
EEP's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
68% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.43 vs. EEP: 1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
EEP' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.57  Med: 4.20 Max: 7.35
Current: 1.5
-2.57
7.35
ROE (%) -2.83
EEP's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
75% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.38 vs. EEP: -2.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
EEP' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.28  Med: 8.53 Max: 16.72
Current: -2.83
-7.28
16.72
ROA (%) 0.39
EEP's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
70% of the 113 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.66 vs. EEP: 0.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
EEP' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.04  Med: 3.87 Max: 5.9
Current: 0.39
-2.04
5.9
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 4.73
EEP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.96 vs. EEP: 4.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
EEP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.77  Med: 8.34 Max: 11.21
Current: 4.73
1.77
11.21
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -13.00
EEP's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 75 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -4.40 vs. EEP: -13.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
EEP' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19  Med: -0.80 Max: 89.3
Current: -13
-19
89.3
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -3.30
EEP's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
61% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.40 vs. EEP: -3.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
EEP' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.3  Med: 0.40 Max: 16.4
Current: -3.3
-12.3
16.4
» EEP's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-07-30)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

EEP Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Jim Simons 210,982 sh (-53.51%)
» More
Q3 2015

EEP Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jim Simons 293,700 sh (+39.21%)
» More
Q4 2015

EEP Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons 298,212 sh (+1.54%)
» More
Q1 2016

EEP Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 757,095 sh (+153.88%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with EEP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Midstream » Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare:NYSE:OKE, AMEX:CQP, NYSE:MWE, NYSE:CPGX, NYSE:BPL, NYSE:PAA, NYSE:MPLX, AMEX:LNG, NYSE:WGP, NYSE:SXL, NYSE:OKS, NYSE:PBA, NYSE:WES, OTCPK:IPPLF, NYSE:TRGP, NYSE:PAGP, NYSE:SEP, NYSE:EQM, NYSE:ENBL, NYSE:SHLX » details
Traded in other countries:49EA.Germany,
Enbridge Energy Partners LP owns and operates crude oil and liquid petroleum transportation and storage assets, and natural gas gathering, treating, processing, transportation and marketing assets in the United States of America.

Enbridge Energy Partners LP is a Delaware limited partnership, formed on October 9, 1991. The Company along with its subsidiaries provides crude oil and liquid petroleum gathering, transportation and storage services, and natural gas gathering, treating, processing, marketing and transportation services in the Gulf Coast and Mid-Continent regions of the United States of America. The Company owns and operates the crude oil and liquid petroleum transportation assets of the OLP, which owns the United States portion of a crude oil and liquid petroleum pipeline system extending from western Canada through the upper and lower Great Lakes region of the United States to eastern Canada. The Company operates through two segments including Liquids and Natural Gas. The Company's Liquids segment includes the Lakehead, North Dakota and the Mid-Continent crude oil systems. The Lakehead system consists of a series of interstate common carrier crude oil and liquid petroleum pipelines that are regulated by the FERC, and storage assets, all of which are located in the Great Lakes and Midwest regions of the United States. Its Lakehead system, together with the Enbridge system in Canada owned by Enbridge, forms the longest liquid petroleum pipeline. The Lakehead system, which spans approximately 2,211 miles and includes approximately 5,022 miles of pipe, has been in operation for more than 60 years and is the primary transporter of crude oil and liquid petroleum from western Canada to the United States. The Lakehead system serves the refining centers in the Great Lakes and Midwest regions of the United States and the province of Ontario, Canada. Its North Dakota crude oil system is approximately 683 miles long, has 23 pump stations, multiple delivery points and storage facilities with an aggregate working storage capacity of approximately 1.8 million barrels. The North Dakota system connects directly into the Lakehead system in the state of Minnesota. Its Mid-Continent system consists of approximately 433 miles of crude oil pipelines, including the FERC-regulated Ozark pipeline and approximately 23.6 million barrels of storage capacity, which serve refineries in the United States Mid-Continent region from Cushing, Oklahoma. The Company's Natural Gas segment consists of natural gas and NGL, rail and liquid marketing services, gathering and transportation pipeline systems, natural gas processing and treating facilities and NGL fractionation facilities, predominantly located in active producing basins in east and north Texas, as well as the Texas Panhandle and western Oklahoma. The Natural Gas segment is comprised of five active and five standby natural gas treating plants and 17 active and eight standby natural gas processing plants, excluding plants that are inactive based on current volumes. In addition, Natural Gas segment includes approximately 10,900 miles of natural gas and NGL gathering and transmission pipelines, as well as trucks, trailers and

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 30.58
EEP's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
69% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 21.65 vs. EEP: 30.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 2.09
EEP's P/B is ranked higher than
51% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.03 vs. EEP: 2.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
EEP' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 1.66 Max: 3.15
Current: 2.09
0.4
3.15
P/S 1.65
EEP's P/S is ranked higher than
65% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.72 vs. EEP: 1.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
EEP' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 0.94 Max: 1.79
Current: 1.65
0.22
1.79
POCF 8.59
EEP's POCF is ranked lower than
52% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.35 vs. EEP: 8.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
EEP' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.29  Med: 9.13 Max: 20.76
Current: 8.59
4.29
20.76
EV-to-EBIT 27.65
EEP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
71% of the 85 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 21.01 vs. EEP: 27.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
EEP' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10  Med: 19.60 Max: 92.7
Current: 27.65
10
92.7
EV-to-EBITDA 16.40
EEP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
62% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 14.31 vs. EEP: 16.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
EEP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.2  Med: 13.40 Max: 29.4
Current: 16.4
7.2
29.4
Shiller P/E 33.47
EEP's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
50% of the 44 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 26.31 vs. EEP: 33.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
EEP' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.22  Med: 26.14 Max: 47.93
Current: 33.47
9.22
47.93
Current Ratio 0.34
EEP's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
95% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.10 vs. EEP: 0.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
EEP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 0.92 Max: 3.39
Current: 0.34
0.28
3.39
Quick Ratio 0.33
EEP's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
95% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.94 vs. EEP: 0.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
EEP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 0.83 Max: 3.25
Current: 0.33
0.18
3.25
Days Inventory 8.59
EEP's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
77% of the 83 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 16.92 vs. EEP: 8.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
EEP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.43  Med: 6.14 Max: 8.95
Current: 8.59
3.43
8.95
Days Sales Outstanding 1.31
EEP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
98% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 31.66 vs. EEP: 1.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
EEP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.15  Med: 2.33 Max: 9.43
Current: 1.31
1.15
9.43
Days Payable 80.74
EEP's Days Payable is ranked higher than
71% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 41.28 vs. EEP: 80.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
EEP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.44  Med: 23.98 Max: 90.7
Current: 80.74
9.44
90.7

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 10.12
EEP's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
78% of the 118 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.72 vs. EEP: 10.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
EEP' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.4  Med: 7.39 Max: 16.15
Current: 10.12
5.4
16.15
Dividend Growth (3y) 2.30
EEP's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked lower than
75% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.90 vs. EEP: 2.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
EEP' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.90 Max: 10.3
Current: 2.3
0
10.3
Forward Dividend Yield 10.05
EEP's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
75% of the 120 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.65 vs. EEP: 10.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 11.34
EEP's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
66% of the 119 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.77 vs. EEP: 11.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
EEP' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.05  Med: 8.28 Max: 18.09
Current: 11.34
6.05
18.09
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -12.10
EEP's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
61% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -10.10 vs. EEP: -12.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
EEP' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33.5  Med: -12.10 Max: 2.7
Current: -12.1
-33.5
2.7

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 2.21
EEP's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
53% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.28 vs. EEP: 2.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
EEP' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 2.16 Max: 3.42
Current: 2.21
0.45
3.42
Price/Median PS Value 1.75
EEP's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
81% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. EEP: 1.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
EEP' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 1.26 Max: 5.92
Current: 1.75
0.26
5.92
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 3.60
EEP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
53% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.10 vs. EEP: 3.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
EEP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.1  Med: 5.10 Max: 10
Current: 3.6
1.1
10
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -8.37
EEP's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
76% of the 55 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -0.55 vs. EEP: -8.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
EEP' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -25.1  Med: -8.30 Max: 4
Current: -8.37
-25.1
4

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $4,779
EPS (TTM) $ -0.44
Beta1.39
Short Percentage of Float3.96%
52-Week Range $14.27 - 34.49
Shares Outstanding (Mil)430.16

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 5,908 5,992 6,382
EPS ($) 0.76 0.83 1.37
EPS w/o NRI ($) 0.76 0.83 1.37
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
N/A
» More Articles for EEP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Pennsylvania Trust Co.'s Top Sales in Q2 2015 Jul 19 2015 
GuruFocus Names Top Five Dividend Growers of the Week Jan 12 2015 
Weekly 52-Week Highs Highlight: KLAC, BMO, EEP, GLW Jun 30 2014 
Renaissance Technologies Continues to Bid on This Stock, But You Should Not Apr 07 2014 
My 4 Favorite High-Yield Oil and Gas Pipeline Stocks Mar 14 2013 
Thirteen Income Stocks Boosting Investor Returns Aug 06 2012 
DCP Midstream Partners LP: Organic Growth Projects Hint at Future Dividend Growth Jun 14 2012 
DCP Midstream Partners LP: Organic Growth Projects Hint at Future Dividend Growth Jun 12 2012 
Enterprise Products Partners (EPD): A Pipeline Cash Machine Apr 27 2012 
Best Recommended High-Yield Dividend Challengers Mar 15 2012 

More From Other Websites
Is Phillips 66 Partners’ Leverage Concerning? Jul 01 2016
Enbridge Energy Partners Trades at a Yield above 10% Jun 28 2016
Enbridge Energy Partners LP breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : EEP-US : June... Jun 28 2016
How Are MLPs Valuated after Brexit? Jun 27 2016
Targa Resources Trades at a Higher Forward Yield than Peers Jun 27 2016
Is Enbridge Energy Partners’ Discounted Valuation Justified? Jun 27 2016
Credit Suisse Loves These 3 High-Yielding MLPs Now Jun 23 2016
Enbridge Energy Intends to Invest $7M for Cleanup Equipment Jun 23 2016
What Does Targa Resources’ Leverage Indicate? Jun 21 2016
Enbridge getting cleanup equipment just in case of oil spill Jun 21 2016
Enbridge getting cleanup equipment just in case of oil spill Jun 21 2016
Seaport Initiates Coverage of Magellan Midstream as a Buy Jun 14 2016
Enbridge Energy Partners (EEP): Strong Industry, Solid Earnings Estimate Revisions Jun 02 2016
How Does ONEOK Partners’ Valuation Compare to Its Peers’? Jun 01 2016
Technical Breakdown on Oil and Gas Pipeline Stocks Jun 01 2016
Hunting for value plays May 27 2016
Why 58.com Inc (ADR) (WUBA)’s Stock Is Trending on Wednesday? May 25 2016
Why Did Tallgrass Energy Partners Increase Its 2016 Guidance? May 18 2016
ENBRIDGE ENERGY PARTNERS LP Financials May 06 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)