Switch to:
Also traded in: Argentina, Brazil, Germany, Mexico, Switzerland, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.16
LMT's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
76% of the 189 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.47 vs. LMT: 0.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
LMT' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.43 Max: N/A
Current: 0.16
Equity-to-Asset 0.03
LMT's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
91% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. LMT: 0.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
LMT' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.22 Max: 0.38
Current: 0.03
0
0.38
Interest Coverage 8.76
LMT's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
60% of the 138 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 12.65 vs. LMT: 8.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
LMT' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.37  Med: 12.22 Max: 15.21
Current: 8.76
8.37
15.21
Piotroski F-Score: 8
Altman Z-Score: 2.83
WACC vs ROIC
5.44%
28.81%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 11.63
LMT's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
79% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 4.45 vs. LMT: 11.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
LMT' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.42  Med: 10.39 Max: 12.55
Current: 11.63
8.42
12.55
Net Margin % 10.49
LMT's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
84% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 3.57 vs. LMT: 10.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
LMT' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.71  Med: 7.02 Max: 11.22
Current: 10.49
5.71
11.22
ROE % 224.83
LMT's ROE % is ranked higher than
98% of the 175 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 6.89 vs. LMT: 224.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
LMT' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 36.35  Med: 98.94 Max: 527.88
Current: 224.83
36.35
527.88
ROA % 10.50
LMT's ROA % is ranked higher than
91% of the 191 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.31 vs. LMT: 10.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
LMT' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.17  Med: 8.51 Max: 10.92
Current: 10.5
7.17
10.92
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 98.42
LMT's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
95% of the 191 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 10.76 vs. LMT: 98.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
LMT' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 86.96  Med: 96 Max: 112.7
Current: 98.42
86.96
112.7
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 3.90
LMT's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
50% of the 172 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 3.90 vs. LMT: 3.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
LMT' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7  Med: 6.9 Max: 13
Current: 3.9
-7
13
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 9.90
LMT's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
67% of the 133 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 5.40 vs. LMT: 9.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
LMT' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -25.5  Med: 7.25 Max: 29.7
Current: 9.9
-25.5
29.7
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 11.00
LMT's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
60% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. LMT: 11.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
LMT' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -66.4  Med: 8.55 Max: 204.7
Current: 11
-66.4
204.7
» LMT's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

LMT Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Ray Dalio 1,400 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 151,800 sh (New)
Louis Moore Bacon 18,998 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 149,146 sh (+3930.97%)
Paul Tudor Jones 1,341 sh (+25.44%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 966 sh (+0.31%)
Jim Chanos 391 sh (unchged)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 40,686 sh (-4.76%)
John Rogers 33,417 sh (-4.87%)
Mario Gabelli 2,298 sh (-8.01%)
Ken Fisher 3,245 sh (-9.86%)
Jeremy Grantham 1,280 sh (-18.99%)
Ruane Cunniff 1,885 sh (-20.96%)
Tweedy Browne 83,600 sh (-44.24%)
First Eagle Investment 675,721 sh (-49.41%)
Jim Chanos 15,631 sh (-50.15%)
John Burbank 162,376 sh (-57.26%)
Jim Simons 127,700 sh (-62.08%)
» More
Q3 2016

LMT Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Mairs and Power 1,604 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 57,733 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 5,799 sh (+332.44%)
Ruane Cunniff 2,133 sh (+13.16%)
Ken Fisher 3,270 sh (+0.77%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 969 sh (+0.31%)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
Jim Chanos Sold Out
Mario Gabelli 2,293 sh (-0.22%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 40,423 sh (-0.65%)
John Rogers 32,745 sh (-2.01%)
Tweedy Browne 80,175 sh (-4.10%)
First Eagle Investment 599,955 sh (-11.21%)
John Burbank 49,450 sh (-69.55%)
Louis Moore Bacon 3,232 sh (-82.99%)
Caxton Associates 20,000 sh (-86.82%)
Steven Cohen 4,000 sh (-97.32%)
» More
Q4 2016

LMT Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Ray Dalio 13,100 sh (New)
Jim Simons 680,900 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 106,509 sh (+84.49%)
Ken Fisher 3,631 sh (+11.04%)
Paul Tudor Jones 6,411 sh (+10.55%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 42,823 sh (+5.94%)
Mario Gabelli 2,328 sh (+1.53%)
Keeley Asset Management Corp 973 sh (+0.41%)
Mairs and Power 1,604 sh (unchged)
John Rogers 32,745 sh (unchged)
First Eagle Investment Sold Out
Tweedy Browne Sold Out
Ruane Cunniff Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
John Burbank 29,809 sh (-39.72%)
Steven Cohen 2,000 sh (-50.00%)
» More
Q1 2017

LMT Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Ken Fisher 4,117 sh (+13.38%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 44,891 sh (+4.83%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with LMT

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Aerospace & Defense » Aerospace & Defense    NAICS: 336414    SIC: 3761
Compare:NYSE:UTX, OTCPK:EADSY, NYSE:GD, NYSE:BA, NYSE:RTN, NYSE:NOC, OTCPK:SAFRY, OTCPK:BAESF, OTCPK:THLEF, OTCPK:RYCEF, NYSE:LLL, NYSE:TXT, NYSE:COL, NYSE:TDG, NYSE:HII, OTCPK:FINMY, NYSE:SPR, OTCPK:MTUAY, NAS:BEAV, NYSE:OA » details
Traded in other countries:LMT.Argentina, LMTB34.Brazil, LOM.Germany, LMT.Mexico, LMT.Switzerland, 0R3E.UK,
Headquarter Location:USA
Lockheed Martin Corp is a security and aerospace company. The Company is engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration and sustainment of technology systems, products and services.

Lockheed Martin is the largest defense contractor in the world and is the undisputed leader in next-generation fighter aircraft, after being awarded the F-35 program in 2001. Total sales for Lockheed in 2016 stood at $47.2 billion. Aeronautics is the largest business segment, accounting for about 38% of 2016 sales. The remainder of the company's sales are generated by mission systems and training (28.5%), space systems (20%), and missiles and fire control (14%).

Guru Investment Theses on Lockheed Martin Corp

John Rogers Comments on Lockheed Martin Corp. - Sep 03, 2015

Defense and aeronautics company Lockheed Martin Corp. (NYSE:LMT) fell -7.68%, despite an earnings beat. Specifically, the company announced earnings of $2.74 per share; the Wall Street estimate had been $ 2.50. Revenues were actually a bit short of expectations, so the market took the stock down a bit, given its relatively full valuation. We continue to see it as a very high-quality enterprise with a strong competitive advantage.





John Rogers (Trades, Portfolio)' Ariel Focus Fund second quarter 2015 commentary.

Check out John Rogers latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Lockheed Martin Corp

How Donald Trump's Tweets Could Make Day Trading Great Again The choppy stock market is ideal for short-term traders
Day traders love volatility, and it looks like there is going to be some action in the markets with Donald Trump taking office in just a matter of days. Now, whether you like him or not, Trump is making day trading great again and already creating opportunities. Read more...
Interset 4 With Major Advancements in Behavioral Analytics for Threat Detection Is Released at Gartner Security & Risk Management Summit

New User Behavior Analytics (UBA) Platform Features Adaptive Entity Analytics, Intelligent Cyber-hunting and Incident Response Capabilities

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD--(Marketwired - Jun 13, 2016) - Advanced security behavior analytics leader Interset has released Interset 4, a new version of its User Behavior Analytics (UBA) Advanced Threat Detection Platform. The new version features Adaptive Entity Analytics for more accurate threat detection, a built-in, intelligent cyber hunting tool, as well as a host of new features and integrations for surfacing high-risk threats and stopping advanced cyber attacks. Interset separately announced today a partnership with Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) Commercial Cyber. The company announced last week a strategic investment and technology development agreement with In-Q-Tel (IQT), the strategic investor that identifies innovative technology solutions to support the missions of the U.S. Intelligence Community. See Interset at the Gartner's Security & Risk Summit 2016 at the Gaylord National Resort and Conference Center in National Harbor, Md., from June 13-16, booth #927. Among the new features in Interset 4 are Adaptive Entity Analytics, a patented analytics engine core process in which multiple data sources containing millions to billions of events can be automatically correlated, analyzed, and prioritized through risk scoring and connected to the users, files, machines, and applications involved. These entity-level risk analytics focus results to achieve faster, more accurate threat detection and prioritization with a dramatic reduction in false positives and event noise. To remove the guesswork associated with existing cyber hunting tools, Interset has integrated an intelligent cyber hunting capability that combines Interset's artificial intelligence-powered, entity risk scoring with open source search and visualization technologies Elasticsearch and Kibana. This powerful combination delivers the ability to correlate, connect, and explore entities and events tied to high risk events across different data sets. Cyber hunters can start with a "targeted hypothesis" and be assisted as they explore and pivot views across users, machines, application, and files. As a result, cyber hunters have a much higher success rate in proactively uncovering early stage attacks. Interset 4 also adds analytic models for compromised account and endpoint threat detection. "Successful threat detection means being able to proactively and automatically detect many different types of risks or threats in multiple places from multiple data sources, as they unfold, in the early stages," said Interset CTO Stephan Jou. "With Interset 4, our goal is to take the guesswork out of threat detection and replace it with A.I.-powered, multidimensional views so investigators can quickly understand the severity and context of an incident and cyber-hunters can expand their investigations to look at associated users, machines, files and applications -- each entity giving an entirely new view into potential threats and attack surfaces." Interset detects, surfaces and correlates attacks such as compromised account, insider attack, lateral movement, data staging, risky behavior, data exfiltration and more. The Interset 4 Threat Detection Platform features:

Adaptive Entity Analytics to decrease threat detection time and increase accuracy.
Intelligent Assist Cyber-Hunting to take the guess work out of traditional hunting by approaching and supporting the proactive discovery of early stage attacks.
Expanded Active Directory (AD) authentication and access models to speed detection and surfacing of compromised accounts.
Enhanced endpoint threat coverage for machine, application and file malware exploits
Improved incident validation and response, enabling analysts to quickly determine the type, context and severity of an attack to more effectively respond.
Connector for FireEye TAP, so internal threats detected by Interset are correlated with threat-intelligence feeds and perimeter threats discovered by FireEye
Integration with McAfee DXL/ESM which delivers inside threats with contextual forensics to make threat detection, investigation, and response seamless and effective
Interset Threat Analytics Cloud (I-TAC), the industry's only big data, behavioral analytics, threat detection platform delivered as a cloud service.

Connect with Interset or schedule a threat assessment at http://go.interset.com/threat-analysis-signup-1. About Interset

Interset provides highly intelligent, accurate insider and targeted outsider threat detection. Our solution unlocks the power of behavioral analytics, machine learning, and big data to provide the fastest, most flexible, and affordable way for IT teams of all sizes to operationalize a data-protection program. Utilizing agentless data collectors, lightweight endpoint sensors, advanced behavioral analytics, and an intuitive user interface, Interset provides unparalleled visibility into sensitive data. This enables early attack detection and actionable forensic intelligence with reduced false positives and noise. Interset solutions are deployed to protect critical data across the manufacturing, life sciences, high-tech, finance, government, intelligence communities, aerospace and defense, and securities brokerage industries. For more information, visit Interset.com and follow us on Twitter @intersetca.


Contact:

Betsy Kosheff

Email Contact

413-232-7057





Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 15.65
LMT's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
76% of the 125 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 21.29 vs. LMT: 15.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
LMT' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.55  Med: 14.2 Max: 22.62
Current: 15.65
7.55
22.62
Forward PE Ratio 21.41
LMT's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
81% of the 167 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 17.83 vs. LMT: 21.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 21.08
LMT's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
50% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 20.97 vs. LMT: 21.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
LMT' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.67  Med: 14.41 Max: 24.12
Current: 21.08
7.67
24.12
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 13.37
LMT's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
77% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 21.19 vs. LMT: 13.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
LMT' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.89  Med: 14.53 Max: 172.35
Current: 13.37
5.89
172.35
PB Ratio 52.75
LMT's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
99% of the 179 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.31 vs. LMT: 52.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
LMT' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.92  Med: 10.75 Max: 776.61
Current: 52.75
2.92
776.61
PS Ratio 1.65
LMT's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
59% of the 188 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. LMT: 1.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
LMT' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.53  Med: 0.97 Max: 1.85
Current: 1.65
0.53
1.85
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 19.26
LMT's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
52% of the 85 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 19.59 vs. LMT: 19.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
LMT' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.27  Med: 14.02 Max: 49.9
Current: 19.26
6.27
49.9
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 15.33
LMT's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
65% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 12.79 vs. LMT: 15.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
LMT' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.02  Med: 10.69 Max: 24.04
Current: 15.33
5.02
24.04
EV-to-EBIT 15.63
LMT's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
84% of the 261 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 15.25 vs. LMT: 15.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
LMT' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.1  Med: 9.5 Max: 18.3
Current: 15.63
5.1
18.3
EV-to-EBITDA 12.94
LMT's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
73% of the 281 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 12.69 vs. LMT: 12.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
LMT' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.4  Med: 7.95 Max: 15
Current: 12.94
4.4
15
PEG Ratio 2.86
LMT's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.78 vs. LMT: 2.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
LMT' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 1.71 Max: 3.75
Current: 2.86
0.34
3.75
Shiller PE Ratio 26.22
LMT's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 30.65 vs. LMT: 26.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
LMT' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.76  Med: 22.53 Max: 68.99
Current: 26.22
12.76
68.99
Current Ratio 1.22
LMT's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
76% of the 189 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.58 vs. LMT: 1.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
LMT' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 1.15 Max: 1.58
Current: 1.22
1
1.58
Quick Ratio 0.85
LMT's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
65% of the 188 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. LMT: 0.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
LMT' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.62  Med: 0.89 Max: 1.06
Current: 0.85
0.62
1.06
Days Inventory 41.44
LMT's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
84% of the 179 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 116.43 vs. LMT: 41.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
LMT' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.37  Med: 21.84 Max: 41.44
Current: 41.44
16.37
41.44
Days Sales Outstanding 65.70
LMT's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
96% of the 159 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 58.48 vs. LMT: 65.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
LMT' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.34  Med: 46.11 Max: 65.7
Current: 65.7
10.34
65.7
Days Payable 22.57
LMT's Days Payable is ranked lower than
94% of the 149 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 54.51 vs. LMT: 22.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
LMT' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.39  Med: 17.49 Max: 22.57
Current: 22.57
12.39
22.57

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 2.54
LMT's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
74% of the 224 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.85 vs. LMT: 2.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
LMT' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.22  Med: 2.9 Max: 4.88
Current: 2.54
1.22
4.88
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.55
LMT's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
72% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.29 vs. LMT: 0.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
LMT' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.46 Max: 0.62
Current: 0.55
0.21
0.62
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 12.30
LMT's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
68% of the 85 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 4.30 vs. LMT: 12.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
LMT' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 16.65 Max: 33.6
Current: 12.3
0
33.6
Forward Dividend Yield % 2.69
LMT's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
72% of the 219 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.76 vs. LMT: 2.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 5.18
LMT's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
78% of the 290 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.65 vs. LMT: 5.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
LMT' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.49  Med: 5.91 Max: 9.94
Current: 5.18
2.49
9.94
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 3.40
LMT's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: -1.30 vs. LMT: 3.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
LMT' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.6  Med: 1.55 Max: 6.6
Current: 3.4
-4.6
6.6

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 2.56
LMT's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
69% of the 102 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.73 vs. LMT: 2.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
LMT' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 1.29 Max: 2.57
Current: 2.56
0.64
2.57
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 1.86
LMT's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
58% of the 33 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.78 vs. LMT: 1.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.71
LMT's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
79% of the 154 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. LMT: 1.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
LMT' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 0.79 Max: 1.75
Current: 1.71
0.33
1.75
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 2.96
LMT's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
68% of the 41 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.26 vs. LMT: 2.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
LMT' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 1.36 Max: 3.52
Current: 2.96
0.39
3.52
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 6.41
LMT's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
85% of the 290 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 6.08 vs. LMT: 6.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
LMT' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.5  Med: 10.5 Max: 19.5
Current: 6.41
5.5
19.5
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 10.99
LMT's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
63% of the 114 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 6.20 vs. LMT: 10.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
LMT' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.5  Med: 14.95 Max: 34.8
Current: 10.99
9.5
34.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $49,274
EPS (TTM) $ 17.25
Beta0.58
Short Percentage of Float0.94%
52-Week Range $227.85 - 276.64
Shares Outstanding (Mil)289.82

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 50,288 52,338 54,725
EPS ($) 12.64 13.94 16.45
EPS without NRI ($) 12.64 13.94 16.45
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
6.21%
Dividends per Share ($) 7.57 8.30 8.70
» More Articles for LMT

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Lockheed Martin Contracts Guardtime Federal for Innovative Cyber Technology Apr 27 2017 
Lockheed Martin Declares Second Quarter 2017 Dividend Apr 26 2017 
Lockheed Martin Delivers New Capabilities for F-35 Logistics System Apr 26 2017 
Lockheed Martin to Upgrade and Support Sensors for Japan's Apache Fleet Apr 26 2017 
Lockheed Martin Continues Successful Flight Demonstrations of Fury Expeditionary Unmanned Aerial Sys Apr 26 2017 
U.S. Navy's Fifth Lockheed Martin-Built MUOS Satellite Now Supporting Troops with Ultra High Frequen Apr 24 2017 
Protecting the Soldier: U.S. Army Orders More Q-53 Counterfire Radars from Lockheed Martin Apr 24 2017 
Let the FORTIS® Tool Arm Give You a Hand! Apr 20 2017 
Long Range Discrimination Radar Program Led by Lockheed Martin Achieves Preliminary Design Review On Apr 20 2017 
Lockheed Martin Announces First Quarter 2017 Earnings Results Webcast Apr 18 2017 

More From Other Websites
Raytheon Sees 'Significant Demand Signals' As Syria Heats Up Apr 27 2017
Dow Jones Industrial Average And Dow Stocks: News And Analysis Apr 27 2017
Lockheed Martin's Modernized TACMS Missile Aces Fifth Consecutive Flight Test Apr 27 2017
Lockheed Martin Corp. :LMT-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : April 27, 2017 Apr 27 2017
Lockheed Martin Contracts Guardtime Federal for Innovative Cyber Technology Apr 27 2017
Lockheed Martin Declares Second Quarter 2017 Dividend Apr 26 2017
Lockheed Martin wins $423 million U.S. defense contract: Pentagon Apr 26 2017
ULA gives Lockheed Martin Space Systems a boost, but execs say that won't last Apr 26 2017
The Brains For Lockheed's F-35 Just Got Smarter Apr 26 2017
Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics Hit Buy Points On Strong Earnings Apr 26 2017
How Boeing's Air Force Tanker Woes Are Helping Its Commercial Planes Apr 26 2017
United Technologies Beats Q1 Forecasts On Broad Strength Apr 26 2017
Defense Stock Roundup: TXT, HON, LMT and COL Apr 26 2017
Few agencies have the regulatory czars Trump requested Apr 26 2017
Lockheed Martin to upgrade F-35 logistics and maintenance software -sources Apr 26 2017
Lockheed Martin Receives Approval for F-35 Logistics and Maintenance System Upgrade Apr 26 2017
Lockheed Martin Delivers New Capabilities for F-35 Logistics System Apr 26 2017
Boeing Loses Altitude After Earnings Apr 26 2017
Good Vibes for Aerospace in General Dynamics Earnings Apr 26 2017
Lockheed Martin to Upgrade and Support Sensors for Japan's Apache Fleet Apr 26 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)