Switch to:
Also traded in: Brazil, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, USA

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.18
MT's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
68% of the 503 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 0.47 vs. MT: 0.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
MT' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.2 Max: 1.26
Current: 0.18
0.03
1.26
Equity-to-Asset 0.40
MT's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
59% of the 493 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 0.46 vs. MT: 0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
MT' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.38 Max: 0.48
Current: 0.4
0.02
0.48
Interest Coverage 2.58
MT's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
73% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 9.38 vs. MT: 2.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
MT' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 1.94 Max: 8.06
Current: 2.58
0.63
8.06
Altman Z-Score: 1.60
WACC vs ROIC
11.57%
8.57%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 7.29
MT's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
78% of the 498 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 2.30 vs. MT: 7.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
MT' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -6.54  Med: 4.23 Max: 14.09
Current: 7.29
-6.54
14.09
Net Margin % 3.12
MT's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
64% of the 500 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 1.37 vs. MT: 3.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
MT' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.5  Med: 1.42 Max: 9.85
Current: 3.12
-12.5
9.85
ROE % 7.63
MT's ROE % is ranked higher than
73% of the 479 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 3.17 vs. MT: 7.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
MT' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -25.45  Med: 2.24 Max: 20.11
Current: 7.63
-25.45
20.11
ROA % 2.93
MT's ROA % is ranked higher than
65% of the 506 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 1.46 vs. MT: 2.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
MT' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.66  Med: 1.02 Max: 8.04
Current: 2.93
-9.66
8.04
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 12.00
MT's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
72% of the 504 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 5.50 vs. MT: 12.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
MT' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.56  Med: 4.16 Max: 21.89
Current: 12
-14.56
21.89
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -10.10
MT's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
64% of the 487 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: -5.80 vs. MT: -10.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
MT' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -36.6  Med: -4.1 Max: 55.3
Current: -10.1
-36.6
55.3
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 16.70
MT's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
71% of the 373 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 3.20 vs. MT: 16.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
MT' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -55.4  Med: -2.95 Max: 187.2
Current: 16.7
-55.4
187.2
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with ArcelorMittal SA $MT.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» MT's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-12)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

MT Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 5,567,420 sh (+88.02%)
» More
Q2 2016

MT Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 21,298 sh (New)
Jim Simons 12,992,409 sh (+133.36%)
» More
Q3 2016

MT Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Sarah Ketterer 1,475,251 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jim Simons 6,964,231 sh (-46.40%)
» More
Q4 2016

MT Guru Trades in Q4 2016

David Tepper 976,578 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 410,900 sh (New)
Sarah Ketterer 877,287 sh (-40.53%)
Jim Simons 1,157,679 sh (-83.38%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MT

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Steel » Steel    NAICS: 331110 
Compare:OTCPK:NSSMY, NYSE:PKX, NYSE:TS, NYSE:NUE, OTCPK:TKAMY, OTCPK:FOSUF, OTCPK:SVJTY, OTCPK:CTPCF, NAS:STLD, NYSE:GGB, NYSE:X, NYSE:RS, OTCPK:HMTLY, OTCPK:ANGGY, NYSE:SID, NYSE:TX, OTCPK:SSAAY, OTCPK:APEMY, OTCPK:ANIOY, OTCPK:BLSFF » details
Traded in other countries:ARMT34.Brazil, MT.France, ARRB.Germany, NSCLU31340.Luxembourg, MTN.Mexico, MT.Netherlands, MTS.Spain, MT.Switzerland, AMSYF.USA,
ArcelorMittal SA is a steel and mining company. Its products include flat products such as sheet & plate and long steel products. It serves automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging markets.

ArcelorMittal SA is a steel and mining company. It is a steel producer and a producer of iron ore and coal. The Company has five reportable segments: NAFTA; Brazil; Europe; ACIS; and Mining. The NAFTA segment produces flat, long and tubular products. Flat products include slabs, hot-rolled coil, cold-rolled coil, coated steel products and plate and are sold to customers in the following industries: distribution and processing; automotive; pipes and tubes; construction; packaging and appliances. Flat product facilities are located at seven integrated and mini-mill sites located in three countries. Long products include wire rod, sections, rebar, billets, blooms and wire drawing. Long production facilities are located at six integrated and mini-mill sites located in three countries. Brazil segment produces flat, long and tubular products. Flat products include slabs, hot-rolled coil, cold-rolled coil and coated steel. Long products comprise sections, wire rod, bar and rebars, billets, blooms and wire drawing. Europe segment produces flat, long and tubular products. Flat products include hot-rolled coil, cold-rolled coil, coated products, tinplate, plate and slab. These products are sold to customers in the automotive, general industry and packaging industries. Flat product facilities are located at 14 integrated and mini-mill sites located in six countries. Long products include sections, wire rod, rebar, billets, blooms and wire drawing. Long product facilities are located at 14 integrated and mini-mill sites in eight countries. Europe also includes downstream solutions, which provides distribution of long and flat products as well as value-added and customized steel solutions through further processing to meet specific customer requirements. ACIS segment produces a combination of flat, long and tubular products. It has six flat and long production facilities in three countries. Mining segment provides the Company's steel operations with low-cost iron ore and coal reserves and also sells limited amounts of mineral products to third parties. The Company's mines are located in North and South America, Europe, Africa and CIS. It has steel production facilities, as well as iron ore and coal mining operations, in North and South America, Europe, Asia and Africa. The Company is subject to laws and regulations relating to air emissions, wastewater storage, treatment and discharges, the use and handling of hazardous or toxic materials, waste disposal practices, the remediation of environmental contamination, the protection of soil, biodiversity and ecosystems in general and other aspects of the protection of the environment at its multiple locations and operating subsidiaries.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 13.47
MT's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 320 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 15.57 vs. MT: 13.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
MT' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.83  Med: 12.15 Max: 45.27
Current: 13.47
1.83
45.27
Forward PE Ratio 9.74
MT's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
89% of the 36 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 15.60 vs. MT: 9.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 13.47
MT's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
58% of the 318 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 15.74 vs. MT: 13.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
MT' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.83  Med: 10.83 Max: 38.7
Current: 13.47
1.83
38.7
PB Ratio 0.78
MT's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
61% of the 477 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. MT: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
MT' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.56 Max: 2.01
Current: 0.78
0.25
2.01
PS Ratio 0.39
MT's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
64% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 0.55 vs. MT: 0.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
MT' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.29 Max: 1
Current: 0.39
0.07
1
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 10.88
MT's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
75% of the 226 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. MT: 10.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
MT' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.75  Med: 5.61 Max: 16.77
Current: 10.88
1.75
16.77
EV-to-EBIT 10.58
MT's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
63% of the 338 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 12.65 vs. MT: 10.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MT' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1341.1  Med: 7.7 Max: 57.9
Current: 10.58
-1341.1
57.9
EV-to-EBITDA 6.16
MT's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
75% of the 373 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 9.72 vs. MT: 6.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MT' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -63  Med: 6.9 Max: 63.2
Current: 6.16
-63
63.2
Shiller PE Ratio 18.38
MT's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 19.12 vs. MT: 18.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
MT' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.48  Med: 4.86 Max: 22.45
Current: 18.38
2.48
22.45
Current Ratio 1.23
MT's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 426 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. MT: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MT' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.06  Med: 1.4 Max: 2.03
Current: 1.23
1.06
2.03
Quick Ratio 0.41
MT's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
83% of the 426 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 0.98 vs. MT: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MT' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.66 Max: 1.32
Current: 0.41
0.41
1.32
Days Sales Outstanding 19.99
MT's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
84% of the 396 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 55.99 vs. MT: 19.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MT' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.38  Med: 22.25 Max: 34.39
Current: 19.99
15.38
34.39

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -100.00
MT's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
76% of the 250 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: -5.90 vs. MT: -100.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
MT' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 8.5
Current: -100
0
8.5
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.72
MT's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
74% of the 612 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 2.06 vs. MT: 0.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
MT' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.52 Max: 1.47
Current: 0.72
0.11
1.47
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -5.30
MT's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 224 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: -1.80 vs. MT: -5.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MT' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -125.3  Med: -5.3 Max: 1.4
Current: -5.3
-125.3
1.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.96
MT's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
55% of the 462 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 1.06 vs. MT: 0.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
MT' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 0.72 Max: 2.33
Current: 0.96
0.36
2.33
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.06
MT's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
56% of the 254 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. MT: 1.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
MT' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 0.52 Max: 3.13
Current: 1.06
0.28
3.13
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.34
MT's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
55% of the 465 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 1.35 vs. MT: 1.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
MT' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.32  Med: 1.06 Max: 3.17
Current: 1.34
0.32
3.17
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.76
MT's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
59% of the 259 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 0.85 vs. MT: 0.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
MT' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 0.78 Max: 4.13
Current: 0.76
0.3
4.13
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 9.42
MT's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
74% of the 472 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: 4.50 vs. MT: 9.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
MT' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.7  Med: 7.9 Max: 32.3
Current: 9.42
1.7
32.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 3.63
MT's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
59% of the 286 Companies
in the Global Steel industry.

( Industry Median: -3.68 vs. MT: 3.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
MT' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.6  Med: 11.3 Max: 38.1
Current: 3.63
-23.6
38.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $56,791
EPS (TTM) $ 0.64
Beta2.87
Short Percentage of Float0.34%
52-Week Range $2.65 - 9.37
Shares Outstanding (Mil)3,057.00

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 64,709 61,688 63,141
EPS ($) 0.91 0.84 0.97
EPS without NRI ($) 0.91 0.84 0.97
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
-26.65%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.13 0.26 0.33
» More Articles for MT

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
7 Stocks Outperforming the Market Jan 24 2017 
Causeway International Value’s Top 3 New Holdings Dec 09 2016 
3 Top Stocks to Play in New Presidency Nov 23 2016 
Former Bestinver Executives' New Fund Lists 4 Top Undervalued Holdings Apr 05 2016 
Why ArcelorMittal Can Get Better Going Forward Mar 11 2015 
ArcelorMittal Portrays A Mixed Outlook Going Forward Feb 19 2015 
Research Report on Monarchy Ventures Inc (OTCMKTS:MONK) Feb 13 2015 
ArcelorMittal's Improving End-Markets Should Lead to Better Times Dec 16 2014 
ArcelorMittal: Doing Well in a Difficult Environment Dec 03 2014 
Weekly Guru Bargains Highlights: MT, FCX, CLR, BSBR, APA Nov 17 2014 

More From Other Websites
Steel Companies’ 4Q16 EBITDA: What You Need to Know Feb 27 2017
Comparing U.S. Steel’s Average Selling Prices with Its Peers Feb 24 2017
What Makes ArcelorMittal Optimistic about Its 2017 Outlook? Feb 24 2017
ArcelorMittal -- Moody's upgrades ArcelorMittal's CFR to Ba1; stable outlook Feb 24 2017
ArcelorMittal publishes its Annual Report 2016 on Form 20-F Feb 23 2017
ArcelorMittal, Votorantim to combine long steel ops in Brazil Feb 23 2017
ArcelorMittal Brasil and Votorantim sign agreement to combine their Brazilian long steel businesses Feb 23 2017
A Deep Dive into US Steel Companies’ 2017 Performance Feb 23 2017
US Steel Companies: Looking for a Solid 2017 Feb 22 2017
Zacks.com featured highlights: Teck Resources, Teradyne, Western Digital, ArcelorMittal and NextEra... Feb 17 2017
Zacks Investment Ideas feature highlights: BHP Billiton, VALE, ArcelorMittal, Nucor and Potlatch Feb 17 2017
LightPointe, a Manufacturer of Wireless Bridges, Deploys Industrial Wireless Solution for... Feb 16 2017
5 Cheap PEG Stocks for Investors Seeking Value Feb 16 2017
Bull of the Day: ArcelorMittal (MT) Feb 16 2017
ArcelorMittal SA :MT-US: Earnings Analysis: 2016 By the Numbers : February 15, 2017 Feb 15 2017
[$$] Carbon border tax could be extended to other industries Feb 14 2017
ArcelorMittal SA :MT-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : February 14, 2017 Feb 14 2017
Did Analysts Rate ArcelorMittal Favorably after Its Earnings? Feb 14 2017
ArcelorMittal’s 4Q16 Earnings Beat Wasn’t a Surprise Feb 13 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)