GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Semiconductors » Intermolecular Inc (NAS:IMI) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Intermolecular (Intermolecular) Piotroski F-Score : 0 (As of Apr. 25, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2011. Start your Free Trial

What is Intermolecular Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Intermolecular has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Intermolecular's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:


Intermolecular Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Intermolecular's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Intermolecular Piotroski F-Score Chart

Intermolecular Annual Data
Trend Dec09 Dec10 Dec11 Dec12 Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 6.00

Intermolecular Quarterly Data
Sep14 Dec14 Mar15 Jun15 Sep15 Dec15 Mar16 Jun16 Sep16 Dec16 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Dec17 Mar18 Jun18 Sep18 Dec18 Mar19 Jun19
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 7.00 6.00 3.00 3.00

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun19) TTM:Last Year (Jun18) TTM:
Net Income was -0.686 + -2.597 + -2.262 + -5.334 = $-10.88 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -0.883 + 0.89 + -2.915 + -3.105 = $-6.01 Mil.
Revenue was 7.862 + 6.321 + 6.651 + 4.618 = $25.45 Mil.
Gross Profit was 5.804 + 4.607 + 4.833 + 3.181 = $18.43 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun18)
to the end of this year (Jun19) was
(43.877 + 43.859 + 43.393 + 50.207 + 45.278) / 5 = $45.3228 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun18) was $43.88 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $11.83 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $26.86 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $5.66 Mil.
Net Income was -1.828 + 0.116 + -0.623 + 0.496 = $-1.84 Mil.

Revenue was 8.622 + 10.548 + 9.675 + 9.802 = $38.65 Mil.
Gross Profit was 5.747 + 6.852 + 6.299 + 6.943 = $25.84 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun17)
to the end of last year (Jun18) was
(46.478 + 45.39 + 44.309 + 43.229 + 43.877) / 5 = $44.6566 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun17) was $46.48 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $32.65 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $4.00 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Intermolecular's current Net Income (TTM) was -10.88. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Intermolecular's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -6.01. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun18)
=-10.879/43.877
=-0.24794311

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun17)
=-1.839/46.478
=-0.03956711

Intermolecular's return on assets of this year was -0.24794311. Intermolecular's return on assets of last year was -0.03956711. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Intermolecular's current Net Income (TTM) was -10.88. Intermolecular's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -6.01. ==> -6.01 > -10.88 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun19)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun18 to Jun19
=11.832/45.3228
=0.26106066

Gearing (Last Year: Jun18)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun17 to Jun18
=0/44.6566
=0

Intermolecular's gearing of this year was 0.26106066. Intermolecular's gearing of last year was 0. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun19)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=26.858/5.663
=4.74271587

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun18)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=32.654/4.002
=8.15942029

Intermolecular's current ratio of this year was 4.74271587. Intermolecular's current ratio of last year was 8.15942029. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Intermolecular's number of shares in issue this year was 49.758. Intermolecular's number of shares in issue last year was 50.06. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=18.425/25.452
=0.72391168

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=25.841/38.647
=0.66864181

Intermolecular's gross margin of this year was 0.72391168. Intermolecular's gross margin of last year was 0.66864181. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun18)
=25.452/43.877
=0.58007612

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun17)
=38.647/46.478
=0.83151168

Intermolecular's asset turnover of this year was 0.58007612. Intermolecular's asset turnover of last year was 0.83151168. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+0+1+1+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Intermolecular has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Intermolecular  (NAS:IMI) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Intermolecular Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Intermolecular's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Intermolecular (Intermolecular) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
3011 North First Street, San Jose, CA, USA, 95134
Intermolecular Inc operates in the technology sector based in the United States. It manufactures and sells support materials for the semiconductor industry. Its HPC platform, which consists of the Tempus processing tools, automated characterization methods and Informatics analysis software, is purpose-built for research and development ("R&D") using combinatorial process systems in concert with established CVD, physical vapor deposition ("PVD") and atomic layer deposition ("ALD") deposition methods. It caters to semiconductor device, semiconductor materials and equipment and clean energy market companies primarily in the Asia-Pacific region.
Executives
Raging Capital Management, Llc 10 percent owner TEN PRINCETON AVENUE, PO BOX 228, ROCKY HILL NJ 08553-0228
Christian Kramer director, officer: President and CEO 6 DAVIS AVE APT B22, RYE NY 10580
Irwin Federman 10 percent owner 2735 SAND HILL ROAD, MENLO PARK CA 94025
Kenneth H Traub director
William C Martin 10 percent owner C/O RAGING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, TEN PRINCETON AVENUE, PO BOX 228, ROCKY HILL NJ 08553
Bill Roeschlein officer: Chief Financial Officer C/O SELECTICA, INC., 3 WEST PLUMERIA, SAN JOSE CA 95134
George Scalise director
Marvin D Burkett director C/O ENTEGRIS, INC., 129 CONCORD ROAD, BILLERICA MA 01821
Redpoint Ventures Ii, L.p. 10 percent owner 3000 SAND HILL ROAD, BUILDING 2, SUITE 290, MENLO PARK CA 94025
Redpoint Associates Ii, Llc 10 percent owner 3000 SAND HILL ROAD, BUILDING 2, SUITE 290, MENLO PARK CA 94025
Redpoint Ventures Ii, Llc 10 percent owner 3000 SAND HILL ROAD, BUILDING 2, SUITE 290, MENLO PARK CA 94025
Neil S Subin other: Former 10% Owner 2336 S.E. OCEAN BOULEVARD, #400, STUART FL 34996
Presidio Management Group Ix, L.l.c. 10 percent owner 2735 SAND HILL ROAD, MENLO PARK CA 94025
Steven M Krausz 10 percent owner 2735 SAND HILL ROAD, MENLO PARK CA 94025
U S Venture Partners Ix L P 10 percent owner 2735 SAND HILL RD, MENLO PARK CA 94025

Intermolecular (Intermolecular) Headlines