Switch to:
Regional Management Corp (NYSE:RM)
Piotroski F-Score
4 (As of Today)

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 8 or 9
Bad or low score = 0 or 1

Regional Management Corp has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

RM' s 10-Year Piotroski F-Score Range
Min: 3   Max: 5
Current: 4

3
5

During the past 5 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Regional Management Corp was 5. The lowest was 3. And the median was 4.


Definition

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* All numbers are in millions except for per share data and ratio. All numbers are in their own currency.

This Year (Jun14) TTM:Last Year (Jun13) TTM:
Net Income was 4.414 + 5.61 + 7.585 + 7.625 = $25.2 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 13.918 + 25.064 + 23.267 + 18.719 = $81.0 Mil.
Revenue was 43.881 + 45.818 + 44.303 + 40.553 = $174.6 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.0 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun13) was $459.9 Mil.
Total Assets was $504.0 Mil.
Long-Term Debt was $324.6 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.0 Mil.
Net Income was 6.404 + 6.764 + 6.022 + 6.988 = $26.2 Mil.

Revenue was 35.941 + 35.519 + 33.628 + 32.785 = $137.9 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.0 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun12) was $341.1 Mil.
Total Assets was $459.9 Mil.
Long-Term Debt was $302.3 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $0.0 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.0 Mil.

Profitability

Q1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Regional Management Corp's current net income was 25.2. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Q2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by total assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Regional Management Corp's current cash flow from operations was 81.0. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Q3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year’s return on assets (1) to last year’s return on assets.

Score 1 if it’s higher, 0 if it’s lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets at the beginning of this year (Jun13)
=25.234/459.944
=0.0548632

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets at the beginning of last year (Jun12)
=26.178/341.065
=0.0767537

Regional Management Corp's return on assets of this year was 0.0548632. Regional Management Corp's return on assets of last year was 0.0767537. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Q4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA =< ROA.

Regional Management Corp's current net income was 25.2. Regional Management Corp's current cash flow from operations was 81.0. ==> 81.0 > 25.2 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Q5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year’s gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year’s gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year)=Long-Term Debt/Total Assets
=324.57/503.995
=0.64399448

Gearing (Last Year)=Long-Term Debt/Total Assets
=302.279/459.944
=0.65720827

Regional Management Corp's gearing of this year was 0.64399448. Regional Management Corp's gearing of last year was 0.65720827. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Q6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year’s current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year’s current ratio.

Score 1 if this year'’s current ratio is higher, 0 if it’s lower

Current Ratio (This Year)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0/0
=

Current Ratio (Last Year)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=0/0
=

Regional Management Corp's current ratio of this year was . Regional Management Corp's current ratio of last year was . ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Q7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Regional Management Corp's number of shares in issue this year was 12.9. Regional Management Corp's number of shares in issue last year was 12.9. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Q8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year’s gross margin (gross profit divided by sales) to last year’s.

Score 1 if this year’s gross margin is higher, 0 if it’s lower.

Gross Margin (This Year)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/174.555
=0

Gross Margin (Last Year)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/137.873
=0

Regional Management Corp's gross margin of this year was 0. Regional Management Corp's gross margin of last year was 0. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Q9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year’s asset turnover (total sales divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year’s asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year’s asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it’s lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the beginning of this year (Jun13)
=174.555/459.944
=0.37951359

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the beginning of last year (Jun12)
=137.873/341.065
=0.40424259

Regional Management Corp's asset turnover of this year was 0.37951359. Regional Management Corp's asset turnover of last year was 0.40424259. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score=Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+Q5+Q6+Q7+Q8+Q9
=1+1+0+1+1+0+1+0+0
=5

Good or high score = 8 or 9

Bad or low score = 0 or 1

Regional Management Corp has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.


Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Related Terms

Net Income, Cash Flow from Operations, Revenue, Gross Profit, Total Assets, Long-Term Debt, Total Current Assets, Total Current Liabilities


Historical Data

* All numbers are in millions except for per share data and ratio. All numbers are in their own currency.

Regional Management Corp Annual Data

Dec09Dec10Dec11Dec12Dec13
Q1 1
Q2 1
Q3 0
Q4 1
Q5 0
Q6 0
Q7 0
Q8 0
Q9 0
F-score 3

Regional Management Corp Quarterly Data

Mar12Jun12Sep12Dec12Mar13Jun13Sep13Dec13Mar14Jun14
Q1 111111
Q2 111111
Q3 000000
Q4 111111
Q5 100011
Q6 000000
Q7 000000
Q8 000000
Q9 110000
F-score 0005543344
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK