1. How to use GuruFocus - Tutorials
  2. What Is in the GuruFocus Premium Membership?
  3. A DIY Guide on How to Invest Using Guru Strategies
Josh Zachariah
Josh Zachariah
Articles (89) 

A Look At Arch Coal Since Buffett Paid The Company a Visit

March 10, 2012 | About:

In November of 2010, Warren Buffett paid a visit to Arch Coal’s Powder River Basin operations in Wyoming. At the time the company was selling at a price of $28. Since that time the price has fallen to $12 with a price to earnings of 17 for 2011 and forward p/e of about 12 for 2012.

The energy landscape has changed dramatically since Buffet looked at Arch Coal in 2010. Not only have natural gas prices nearly fallen by half, but prices of solar panels have also grown much cheaper as cheap Chinese solar panels have flooded the market. Berkshire’s MidAmerican utility most recently invested in a solar farm in California. Even more remarkable is that even as the costs for these forms of electricity production have gone down, the price of coal as gone up.

Coal’s share of total US electricity generation has been steadily dipping as it recently fell below 40%. Most of the gains have accrued to natural gas and as the price of natural gas dipped further in 2011 that trend will only exacerbate problems for the coal industry.

Figures for Arch Coal:


But for companies like Arch Coal, exports are making up an increasingly greater share of revenues. India and China, with their insatiable demand for metallurgical coal that’s used in steel production, are driving up global demand for coal and along with it prices. China is both the largest producer and importer of coal. However, that coal is not coming from Arch Coal as the miner ships nearly half of its exports to Europe.

Many question marks surround Buffett’s trip to the Powder River Basin. Surely he must’ve had some interest in the company even though it probably was not the asking price. Arch Coal is one of the low-cost coal producers and was able to record a net profit in 2011 while Patriot Coal and Alpha Natural Resources both logged net losses. The Berkshire subsidiary Burlington Northern counts coal as one of its largest segments at 27% of total freight revenue so Buffett must feel good about coal’s long-term economics.

Despite coal’s poor reputation for the environment, it’s not going away anytime soon. Compared to most forms of electricity production it’s still the cheapest. Natural gas may very well be cheaper at today’s prices, but its unlikely natural gas prices will remain so low if drillers aren’t able to produce economically.

If coal companies can continue to ship out increasing amounts of coal to foreign markets then this could certainly balance out the loss in market share within the U.S. Earlier this year Buffett proclaimed Burlington Northern would be spending record amounts on capital expenditures. I wonder if these improvements are being made for the coal customers of which Arch Coal is one of them.

Josh Zachariah

About the author:

Josh Zachariah
I credit my father and Warren Buffett for molding me into the investor I am today.

Rating: 3.2/5 (10 votes)


Kcharlson - 5 years ago    Report SPAM
Alpha was profitable in 2011.
Dino25 - 5 years ago    Report SPAM

Nice article. But, implicit in your article and investment premise is the notion that Warren Buffett visited Arch's Powder River Basin operation because he was interested in Arch as an investment. My recollection is that Buffett and other members of Berkshire's board hopped on an antique BNSF private train and needed a place to go for a joy ride while celebtrating the BNSF closing and concluding a Berkshire board meeting's business. So, why not learn more about the BNSF business that they had just acquired than by taking the BNSF private train to go visit one of BNSF's biggest customers/shippers - Arch. I think if Buffett thought Arch was a good investment (or as good as an investment as BNSF), he would have identified it and pulled the trigger on it when studying the BNSF acquisition. After all, hauling ARCH's and others coal represents over 25% of BNSF's business. Buffet didn't buy Arch. He bought BNSF. Presumably because it is a much better business. I am not saying Arch is not a good idea. It might be. But no one should buy it because they think Buffett's visit represented a cruise of a prospect. It is far more likely that the visit represented the best destination/sales call that could be plotted at the conclusion of a celebratory joy ride.
Batbeer2 premium member - 5 years ago
>> Arch. I think if Buffett thought Arch was a good investment (or as good as an investment as BNSF), he would have identified it and pulled the trigger on it when studying the BNSF acquisition.

If memory serves, it's illegal to own both.

Please leave your comment:

Performances of the stocks mentioned by Josh Zachariah

User Generated Screeners

schwanz.jeremyRule 1 S
maggers78Copper Names
dwilsherRoc greenatt
dwilsherRoc green blatt
pacmanhunterDiv Yield Stocks with market c
HOLKLSUTest First Group Q1 Trending 2
cspunarDividend Cover
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat