1. How to use GuruFocus - Tutorials
  2. What Is in the GuruFocus Premium Membership?
  3. A DIY Guide on How to Invest Using Guru Strategies
Ning Jia
Ning Jia
Articles (39)  | Author's Website |

Revisit the Buffett Partnership in 1957, 1960, 1962 and 1966 - After Thoughts

December 12, 2013 | About:

Although I have read Buffett’s early partnership letters a few times, I had never really done the “behind the scene” research prior to embarking on this journey. After all, the Oracle has certainly made it look like it was not that hard to beat the Dow. By now, it is safe to say that his writings have vastly understated the amount of effort he spent on each investment, either intentionally or by accident.

Now, I have a confession to make: I had originally started writing this article series a few months ago. I was not expecting this to be an easy task but certainly did not think it would be too hard either. However, after hours and hours of frustration, I was still stuck with the very first part because neither could I find the definitive evidence why Buffett thought the market was “priced above its intrinsic” value in 1956 nor did I have the slightest idea on how did he achieved the results in 1957. Therefore, the project was put on hold and almost obliterated. I was going to miss out on some great learning opportunity just because it might also be too hard.

Fortunately, I decided to carry on, and this was without a doubt one of the best investment decisions I have ever made.

Although it is clear to me that his record running the partnership is almost impossible to replicate, I have learned tremendously just by doing the research and reverse engineering his decision making. In this epilogue, I want to share with the readers my personal favorites. As a relatively inexperienced value investor, I had thought Buffett bought cigar butts type of investments in his early career and passively waited until they reached their fair value. This has been proved to be a ridiculously naïve and ignorant assessment. Buffett was not a passive investor when it comes to cigar butts. He would keep buying the stock as long as it continued to be a cigar butt. If the price rose, he would sell out for a profit. But if the price did not rise, he would accumulate enough shares to gain control of the company so he could liquidate its assets. He was essentially a liquidator-type of activist. This approach has worked out well with him, although it did come with a lot of pain, especially in the case of Dempster Mills.

I see many amateur investors enamored by the cigar butts approach by buying companies on a purely quantitative basis. This could work out well and there is a sound logic behind it:

By buying assets at a bargain price, we don't need to pull any rabbits out of a hat to get extremely good percentage gains. This is the cornerstone of our investment philosophy: ‘Never count on making a good sale. Have the purchase price be so attractive that even a mediocre sale gives good results. The better sales will be the frosting on the cake.’” - 1962 Letter

This may be a very controversial opinion, but I think for small investors, a pure cigar butts approach will likely to yield unsatisfactory results. There are two main reasons for this. First of all, the value of the cigar butt business is often decreasing day by day, week by week. Such is the case for Dempster Mill and Berkshire Hathaway. Without dramatic changes, both businesses were facing the possibility of going bankruptcy. Secondly, when you invest in a cigar butt, you never know how long will your money be tied up for. Such is the case for Sanborn Map and National American. National American was dirt cheap, yet the farmers who held the shares had seen their shares stagnant for more than 10 years. Sanborn Map was even cheaper. However, had Buffett not gained a controlling position, those directors may keep smoking cigars at the board meeting and leave the shareholders helplessly disgruntled. Buffett’s cigar butt approach is different in that he can actually liquidate the assets to realize value, something a small investor is not able to do.

The above discussion leads to my next favorite part of this article series: “Interestingly enough, although I consider myself to be primarily in the quantitative school (and as I write this no one has come back from recess - I may be the only one left in the class), the really sensational ideas I have had over the years have been heavily weighted toward the qualitative side where I have had a "high-probability insight". This is what causes the cash register to really sing. However, it is an infrequent occurrence, as insights usually are, and, of course, no insight is required on the quantitative side - the figures should hit you over the head with a baseball bat. So the really big money tends to be made by investors who are right on qualitative decisions but, at least in my opinion, the more sure money tends to be made on the obvious quantitative decisions.” – 1967 Letter

The big money is made by buying wonderful businesses at wonderful prices. The investments that made Buffett big fortunes — GEICO, American Express, Coke Cola, Washington Post and See’s Candy — all fall under this category.

This approach sounds too good and too obvious to be true. In theory it may be easy, but in practice it is hard. The easy part is to diligently build up the knowledge base of as many wonderful businesses as one can. This takes time and effort but will prepare an investor when opportunities come. The hard part, which arguably cannot be learned, is to have the right temperament. Buying on the way down when temporary problems happen so fast and furious is almost against human nature. One need both the knowledge-based conviction and the innate fortitude.

My own experiences have reinforced the merits of this approach. At least I have never lost any money buying wonderful businesses, and my biggest winners were mostly wonderful businesses bought at wonderful prices.

In the end, I want to thank Mr. Buffett for the wonderful lessons he has imparted through his ageless writings. I hope the readers find this article series somewhat helpful.

About the author:

Rating: 4.6/5 (21 votes)


Arjun Chan
Arjun Chan - 3 years ago    Report SPAM
Good Article Ning!! Actually in one of the interviews Lilu says that the cigar buts and net-nets are your investments that get you quick gains for bread and butter, but for pure wealth building we have to find wonderful businesses which are few like the 10 holes of a punch card buffet refers to.
Traderatwork - 3 years ago    Report SPAM
Congrates Ning Jia, great series. Wonderful companies at Wonderful price is the key, remind me of MasterCard in 2006 and 2008 (same goes to Visa and AXP), hopefully I will never have to sell them.
20punches - 3 years ago    Report SPAM
Arjun: Thanks for the nice words. Agreed wonderful businesses are where you can make a lot of money. I don't think net-nets can always get you quick gains though because it often takes a long time for the market to recognize the value gap.
20punches - 3 years ago    Report SPAM

Traderatwork: Thanks for your compliment. I'm sure MA and AMEX have made you a lot of money:)
Vgm - 3 years ago    Report SPAM
Ning Jia -- i'd like to add my thanks for an outstanding series. I'm very glad you persevered ;-)

The Buffett quote on the distinction between qualitative and quantitative is intriguing. The term "high-probability insights" suggests both an unusually deep understanding of the business, as well as conviction about the (positive) trajectory of that business over time. To me that's the really difficult bit. Buffett had the courage of his own deep convictions as well as the right temperament to go against the crowd and buy low, as you rightly point out. It's inspirational.

Thanks again!
Haoafu - 3 years ago    Report SPAM
Great series.

One thing caught my attention and makes me thinking: Buffet was buying some of those wonderful businesses at almost net-nets prices(1/4 or 1/5 of the intrinsic value for disney or WPO)!

To obtain the right insight, I believe one should keep expanding his circle of competence and deepening the understanding within the circle of competence. "Luck Is What Happens When Preparation Meets Opportunity".
20punches - 3 years ago    Report SPAM

Vgm: Thanks for the nice words. I'm glad you find this article series helpful. With respect to the high-probability insights, if you have the right temperament, you just need to build up the knowledge base so you can have convictions at the right time. I think most of us on gurufocus have the right temperament, it's probably the knowledge base part that really set someone apart.

20punches - 3 years ago    Report SPAM

Haoafu: I agree with you totally. Your circle of competence will expand as you keep learning everyday and with the expansion, opportunities will be more abundant as well:)

Jonathan.dudzinski - 2 years ago    Report SPAM

You might find my research paper on Cigar Butts interesting: http://www.iijournals.com/doi/abs/10.3905/joi.2014.23.1.017#sthash.t2tNJxuk.TWmqbmDT.dpbs

Please leave your comment:

Performances of the stocks mentioned by Ning Jia

User Generated Screeners

andrewgu999valleylink - gogogo
DBrizanROTA ultimate18nov2017 1041p
DBrizanROTA18nov2017 1041p
DBrizanROTA18nov2017 1035p
DBrizanROTA18nov2017 1032p
DBrizanROTA18nov2017 1025p
averacjrnot about to fail
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat