1. How to use GuruFocus - Tutorials
  2. What Is in the GuruFocus Premium Membership?
  3. A DIY Guide on How to Invest Using Guru Strategies
Articles (403) 

The Beauty of Focus Investing

April 10, 2014 | About:

In the world of investing, we often hear the word diversification. The idea is the more you diversify the less systematic risk you are taking on. And for most individual investors, this makes sense and buying an index fund is a very rational thing to do.

But what if investing is not your full time job and you want to achieve superior returns than the market? Well, there are a few ways for non-professional investors to achieve better returns than the market in my opinion. But the one that makes most sense to me is through focus investing. You can interpret the idea of focus investing differently but to me, focus investing means knowing a small number of companies really well and investing in them when the price is right.

Alan Mecham of Arlington Value Management and David Rofle of Wedgewood Partners are great examples of masters of focus investing. For those of you who are not familiar with Alan Mechem, this article is a good read.

I'm assuming most of the readers have heard of Wedgewood Partners. Their most recent letter to investors is a must read.

Both Arlington Value Fund and the Wedgewood Partners have beaten the market consistently with lower than market risks. What's remarkable about their process is the simplicity embedded in their systems, which is so rare in the asset management business that when Alan Mecham went to New York to meet with the want-to-know-how hedge fund managers, he left them dumbfounded. "Most people left the room mystified."

Now let’s take a closer look at their investment approach:

Alan Mecham (from the article The 400% Man):

“By his own account, and those of other investors who have vetted his fund, Mecham has no secret sauce or amazing algorithm; what's extraordinary about this young man is how ordinary he is. But his investment approach relies on a handful of common-sense tactics -- focusing on just a few stocks.”

"Mecham says his habits today are roughly the same as they were back when he had $200,000 to invest. He sits in that armchair by the window, carefully reading company filings and other records from atop a giant pile of material that he prints out each day. (Mecham prefers to read only on paper, not online -- old school.)”

“His investment approach will be familiar to anyone who has been even a casual follower of Buffett. Mecham looks for businesses with great long-term prospects, great management, strong cash flow and big defensive "moats," or barriers to entry for potential competitors. And he stresses the importance of sitting still and doing nothing. ‘Activity is the enemy of returns,’ says Mecham. ‘If I find two new ideas a year, that's phenomenal.’ Two ideas a year adds up to a pretty small portfolio -- Mecham typically owns between six and 12 stocks.”

“Mecham is bemused that so many people expect him to hold a broad basket of stocks and follow a benchmark, such as the S&P 500. ‘It's laughable to think that in this competitive world, you're going to find brilliant ideas every day,’ he says. ‘The world's just not set up that way.’”

David Rofle (from the 2013 Q3 Client Letter):

“Often we are asked where we come up with new stock ideas for your portfolio. Our usually response starts off with a disclaimer that as focused investors; we are decidedly not a new idea generating shop. Quite frankly, how many best of breed companies truly exist? 5% of publicly traded companies? Maybe 10%? In addition, it typically requires an outsized investment (great company and compelling valuation) to make its way through our investment due diligence process in order to displace an existing holding. Said another way, our research process is where new ideas go to die.

We seek to own growing businesses that exhibit peer leading profitability, so the longer time frame in which we own our businesses, the more opportunity they have to increase shareholder value. Compounding growth companies are a wonderful thing.

Rising valuations are a particular important risk to our holding period. All else equal, the more profits accounted for today, the less opportunity a business has for future compounding. So, in order to characterize valuation we typically refer to historical and relative price/earnings ratios - as well as include discounted cash flow and/or sum of the parts analysis. “

If you pay attention to the bolded words above, you will notice that focusing on a few ideas is the key to both of their investment processes. The beauty of their processes lies in the simplicity of the system.

You may ask, is this a coincidence? I doubt it. I think it is perfectly rational and reasonable. You see, in order for an investor to achieve better returns, he or she must have an edge whether it is information edge, temperament edge, analytical edge or a combination of them.

As value investors, naturally most of us have some sort of temperament edge, but that itself will not guarantee a better return.

What about analytical edge? Very few people possess analytical edge because the way the education system works. It doesn’t matter where you go to school. The education system inherently and unintentionally creates homogeneous thinking among the students. And you have the herding and social proof biases, which make it so hard to think differently.

That leaves us with information edge. Now you may think it’s impossible to gain an information edge against professional investors. But that’s absolutely not true in my experience. While professional investors have more time, not many of them are spending them on the right things and they have to spread the time among numerous companies. If a non-professional investor has 3 hours a day for him or her to spend on investing, what are the changes that one can generate an information edge if one studies 100 companies a year versus if one only studies 6 - 10 companies a year? You can have a tremendous edge if you focus on a few companies and especially a few small and micro-cap companies. You can also know more about a large cap companies but the knowledge gap will likely to be narrower. And better yet, very often information edge reinforces temperament edge.

And if you combine the temperament edge with the information edge, you will be a two legged man in an ass-kicking contest against a one legged man. You will be a master of focus investing. It’s so beautifully simple yet ironically hard.

Please allow me to use an example to demonstrate my point. Let’s say you have studied McDonald’s extensively (which I think 100 hours is enough) so you know the business really well. Here is the chart of McDonald’s PE during the past 10 years:

If you know the business really well, do you have to be a genius to find out that it’s cheap at 13 time forward earnings? And if you have the right temperament, is it that hard to buy something that you know is cheap? And if you buy it cheap, is it unreasonable that you outperform the market?

The above may sound too easy to be true. Yet I can guarantee only a handful investors can do that. In investing, the simplest thing are often the hardest to do. Think about Buffett’s advice on “starting with the A” or Munger’s “Invert, always invert.” You can teach a child to follow those rules but unfortunately, you can’t teach an adult. And how do I know that? Newton’s First Law of Motion.

“Take a simple idea and take it seriously,” says Charlie Munger (Trades, Portfolio). I don’t have a better solution.

About the author:

A global value investor constantly seeking to acquire worldly wisdom. My investment philosophy has been inspired by Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Howard Marks, Chuck Akre, Li Lu, Zhang Lei and Peter Lynch.

Rating: 4.8/5 (18 votes)



Jbsharer - 6 years ago    Report SPAM

The little individual investor can't expect to beat the market return? Wrong. If he understands and can identify managers that invest like this article explains, it is very doable. I invested in Oakmark Select the year of inception and have had the vast majority of my portfolio in since...........it has beaten the S&P return by an average 6% per year in that time period. And I also invested in Rolfe's fund shortly after it opened. I don't have to be an investing genius, I just had to identify who was. I will be retiring early and comfortably due to these two funds.

Grahamites premium member - 6 years ago

Jbsharer: You are a very wise man and I'm sure you will do very well in the long run.

Snowballbuilder - 6 years ago    Report SPAM

Not easy to be a focused investor. Is not for everyone.

- if you are wrong you lose a lot .

- usually the performance is more uncorrelate to the market (so is not true the "mental valium" everyone lose , no one lose)

- Also if you are right you will probably look wrong for long period of time. (Look at berkowitz investment in AIG)

so to be a successful focused investor you have to:

- invest only long term capital

- choose only great & durable company

- ignore the crowd and stay with your position

I m a focused investor with just 6 holding so i know what i m talking about.

Vgm - 6 years ago    Report SPAM

Thanks Grahamites for a timely reminder of the "beauty" of focus investing and the Mecham and Rolfe pieces which I agree are inspirational reading.

The latest memo from Howard Marks (Trades, Portfolio) - Dare to be Great II - posted by Tannor P, echoes your thesis. Marks talks about the importance of betting big when we believe an investment to be significantly in our favor. And he reminds us that if we don't, then even a big winner will fail to have a major beneficial impact. Furthermore, he emphasizes the logical need to be a contrarian, while pointing out that we will "look wrong" and "feel lonely" for periods of time. At those times, which could be longer than we'd like, we need the courage of our (valuation) convictions and emotional stability.

Snowballbuilder also makes some excellent points along similar lines. Berkowitz with AIG and BAC (and currently with Fannie and Freddie) are great examples. I also run a focused portfolio (10-12 names). The potential upside is clear, but by definition there will be significant losers along the way. I try to exit those quickly when necessary. We can try to control and minimize risk, but not eliminate it.

Reading your memo reminded me of Charlie Munger (Trades, Portfolio)'s wonderful advice that all we need are a few big winners, and when we believe we have found them with a margin of safety we should bet BIG. Thanks again!

Grahamites premium member - 6 years ago


-->>Not easy to be a focused investor. Is not for everyone.

I couldn't agree more. If it's easy and if it so for everyone, it will not generate better returns.

And I have no doubt you know what you are talking about and I admire your determination.

Grahamites premium member - 6 years ago

Vgm; Thanks for your kind words.

I agree 100% with Marks and Munger. I think for non-professional investors, who don't have to report performance to outside investors, the ability to absorb and make peace with bumpy return, which is almsot guaranteed if you have a concentrated portfolio, is a tremendous edge.

And as Munber once said, if you strip out Berkshire 20 best ideas, Berkshire' record will be a joke. It's scary to think if Buffett and Munger only have 20 enormously successful ideas, how many can we have?

Jtdaniel - 6 years ago    Report SPAM

Hi Grahamites,

Thank you for a terrific article. The idea of repeatedly buying McDonald's shares as they fall to a historically-favorable multiple is as powerful as it is simple. The key, I take it, is to apply the strategy only to companies which have the resilience of a McDonald's. Since there are few businesses in that pantheon, the focused approach makes since.

Your writing led me to critically examine my portfolio, as through a spinoff and starter positions it has expanded to 18 holdings. Nevertheless, over 75% of the weighting is in seven stocks -- Exxon, Berkshire, Microsoft, American Express, Wal-Mart, Abbott Labs and AbbVie. Sure enough, I have owned each of them for at least ten years, reinvested dividends at times, and bought additional shares at favorable prices. Perhaps most importantly, I have never really felt tempted to sell even a partial position in these quality holdings. Why pay the taxes and reinvest the remainder in something that may prove inferior?

I do agree that the focused approach should work even better with the smaller caps -- hence my more recent starter positions. The valuation is trickier, at least for me, but the buying opportunities should be more frequent. Catching a real compounder early on would be a beautiful thing.

Grahamites premium member - 6 years ago
Jdaniel: Thank you for the nice words. And you are right with regards to companies like McDonalds. They are certainly rare breed and as investors, we want to make sure that they do everything they can to stay rare and great.

I think your selection of stocks is excellent and I think you will do terrific in the long term with your approach and rationality. Small compounders are harder to find but I think they do exist. It's hard to catch them early on because so much of success is dependent on luck. I bet there are more failed could-be compounders than successful compounders. But over our life time, I'm almost sure that we'll come across a few. For instance, Mohnish Pabrai (Trades, Portfolio)'s new insurance company is an interesting opportunity and I'll be watching the development closely.

Thank you again for commenting. Enjoy your investment journey.

Jtdaniel - 6 years ago    Report SPAM

Grahamites, Thank you for the kind feedback. Hormel and Bio-Reference Labs are two smaller cap stocks I think are worth holding for the long run. Actually, I have a 10-year triple in Hormel, not counting dividends. The Peter Lynch chart is very useful for such consistent growth stocks - it is time to break out the financial calculator when the P/E drops below 15. Thanks again.

Grahamites premium member - 6 years ago

Jtdaniel - I appreciate it. Will do some research on Hormel and Bio-Reference Labs. Congratulations on Hormel, nice nice triple.

Graham&Dodd premium member - 6 years ago

Grahamites, I like the MCD chart. Where did you get it?

Kevinoleary9 - 6 years ago    Report SPAM

Why is Alan Mecham not listed as a Guru on Gurufocus?

Please leave your comment:

Performances of the stocks mentioned by Grahamites

User Generated Screeners

wigbertHigh FCF-M2
kosalmmuseBest one1
DBrizanall 2019Feb26
kosalmmuseBest one
DBrizanall 2019Feb25
MsDale*52-Week Low
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)