1. How to use GuruFocus - Tutorials
  2. What Is in the GuruFocus Premium Membership?
  3. A DIY Guide on How to Invest Using Guru Strategies
Dr. Paul Price
Dr. Paul Price
Articles (513)  | Author's Website |

The Only 'Positive Take' on Coach You’re Likely to Read This Week

April 30, 2014 | About:

Do you have the temperment to go against the crowd?

It is easy to say... but harder to do.

Leather goods designer/manufacturer Coach (NYSE:COH) reported lower than year ago, but better than analysts' expectation, fiscal third quarter EPS. The shares cratered pre-market and never really rebounded, closing the day down by 9.34%, at $45.71.

Media coverage went overboard detailing all the reasons why the decline was justified. Talking heads made it perfectly clear why nobody should be interested in owning this iconic luxury goods name, even at a historically ultra-cheap valuation.

Fiscal 2014 (ends June 28, 2014) will mark only the second time, since its 1985 spin-off from Sara Lee, that COH earns less than it did the year before. When was the other time that happened? In fiscal 2009 when earnings declined from $2.08 to $1.91. Coach shares plunged from $37.59 at 2008’s peak to just $11.40 near the market bottom in early 2009.

People avoided the stock at a ridiculously low P/E. They were sure The Great Recession would be the death knell for retailers. The funeral had to be called off, though, after EPS bounced back by almost 22% the next year to what was then an all-time high of $2.33. Before the year was over COH shares had spiked by 228%.

You don’t get many chances to buy shares at rock-bottom prices. When you can, there are always valid reasons why the stock is out of favor and not expected to recover. Smart investors learn to hold their noses and buy anyway.

How does Coach stack up now, compared with some of its best buying opportunities since 2009? Brilliantly, even when taking into account the lowered estimates for this year and next.

The company’s P/E now sits at just 13.5x fiscal 2015’s projection. COH’s current yield of 2.93% is the highest ever paid by this venerable firm. Just as in 2009, nobody is willing to step up and publicly defend a name drawing so much bad press.

Every share that was dumped in despair today, with much fanfare, was being quietly accumulated by value seekers. History says that will work out well for those brave contrarians.

The last three occasions when COH was available near this valuation all proved to be outstanding trading opportunities. The low of $33 in 2010 was followed by $58.60 intra-year. The summer 2011 bottom of $45.70 preceded a move to $79.70 over the next eight months. The early 2013 price of $45.90 offered a quick 35% pop in less than five months.

Numbers crunchers at research firm Morningstar rated Coach as a 4-star BUY going in to today's quarterly report. They saw fair value as $60. That leaves some nice upside following Tuesday’s sell-off. Don’t forget, actual profits of 68 cents per share handily exceeded analyst estimates. Foreign sales were good; it was only domestic same store sales that disappointed.

Management gets paid big bucks to remedy situations like that.

There is no reason to believe that Coach won’t earn $3.40 or so next year. Apply a modest 16 multiple to that number and you get a price 19% above the present quote. Add in dividends and 22% in total return becomes a conservative goal over the next 12 to 15 months.

Intrigued, but wary of whether we’ve seen the near-term bottom? Consider selling some January 2016, $45 puts at $6.70 per share. You will either get exercised at a net cost of $38.30 ($45 strike price: $6.70 put premium) or keep $670 per contract without buying any shares.

Nobody can guarantee that Coach won’t retreat to below that break-even level. What I can say for sure is that not one share of Coach has changed hands for that little in almost four years.

For patient investors, Coach should provide a first-class return on investment.

Disclosure: Long COH shares, short COH options

About the author:

Dr. Paul Price


Visit Dr. Paul Price's Website

Rating: 4.1/5 (14 votes)



The State of Long-Term Expectation
The State of Long-Term Expectation - 3 years ago    Report SPAM

1. There's no margin of safety. Brand recognition in fashion isn't sticky like it can be for other consumer products like Coke or Apple. Tastes change frequently and unpredictably. Maybe Coach is like Ralph Lauren, but maybe it's like Liz Claiborne. I don't think anybody knows.

2. The fact that earnings declined in 2009 can be chalked up to broader macroeconomic problems. The recent earnings decline looks more specific to Coach.

3. If you go to message boards about COH (e.g. Yahoo), most of the discussion actually look pretty bullish. I don't see much evidence of capitulation by regular investors.

Dr. Paul Price
Dr. Paul Price - 3 years ago    Report SPAM

The company has been around and prospering since 1941. Their products are still excellent in quality and appealing.

The shares hit an absolute low today since 2010. By definition that equals 'investor capitulation'.

Buhrlakc - 3 years ago    Report SPAM

What are your thoughts about the risk associated with moving more toward a "lifestyle brand?"

There is some evidence the brand can hold up- approximately 70% of sales in any given year are from products designed in the last 12 months. While that helps support the brand as a competitive advantage argument, do you think the increased competition changes this dynamic? Will the future look like the past in this regard? I understand brands can experience ups/downs, but these comp sales are seriously large numbers, not just a 1-2% decline which could be considered noise.

A question I always have with brands like Coach is: is the success related to the institution (brand) or the design team? Can a competitor pay more or provide more power to a designer and steal that designer from a competitor?

Has the growth in outlet stores tainted the brand? Why or why not?

What confidence level do you have that management won't chase market share at the expense of margins/ brand status?

How much operating leverage is in the business? We are already experiencing margin compression.

Are margins in Europe and China higher/lower than overall margins?

Are you concerned about the inventory creep? What is the increase in other noncurrent assets related to?

Please leave your comment:

Performances of the stocks mentioned by Dr. Paul Price

User Generated Screeners

daftheadersg hk best
henrikLynch inspiret Oct 17
lajor10Low EV/EBITDA
canidPE >50th percentile of INDUSTR
brucexoct 17 user defined screen
AngryQuality Growth cheap
EnjoylifeDad 1
punjanoot2007a academy+joe
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat