1. How to use GuruFocus - Tutorials
  2. What Is in the GuruFocus Premium Membership?
  3. A DIY Guide on How to Invest Using Guru Strategies
Holly LaFon
Holly LaFon
Articles (10163)  | Author's Website |

Smead Value Fund 4th Quarter Shareholder Letter

Review of economy and holdings

Dear Shareholder When putting the fourth quarter of 2016 for the Smead Value Fund (the “Fund”) in context, it is best discussed in two ways: the pre-presidential election period from October 1 to November 8, 2016, and the postelection stretch through the end of the year. Prior to the election, investors discounted what it meant for Democratic Presidential and Congressional candidates to win control of political power in Washington DC. Few investors wanted to own healthcare and bank stocks. We significantly underperformed in the pre-election period, but turned on a dime in the post-election stretch.

It all added up to a gain in the fourth quarter for the Fund (SMVLX) of 4.09% versus a gain of 3.82% for the S&P 500. To say that it is nice to not have to explain our underperformance relative to the index would be an understatement! As most of you know, we run our Fund to maximize long-duration performance and make no effort to turnover our holdings or market-time in a way which would smooth out our results. We own companies which fit our eight criteria for stock selection and fully expect the reward for doing so, even when “Mr. Market” doesn’t smile on us.

Ironically, among the three biggest detractors from our results in the quarter were two of our best long-duration holdings, Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) and eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY). They were joined by Gannett (NYSE:GCI), which has scared most investors away by trying to leverage their newspaper business too much and too quickly. Amgen and eBay are happily among our top ten holdings and have bright futures with very reasonable price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios. Gannett looks very undervalued in many ways, but has been reduced in importance by our sales and the decline in their share price.

Our best contributors to performance were Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM) and American Express (NYSE:AXP). All major financial stocks looked like they were shot out of a gun the day after the election. Since they have been hated for the last nine years, they could be indicating that their low share prices in relation to book value and earnings power could revert to the mean over the next five to ten years. A word of caution on the banks: while we are very positive on them for the long haul, we are nervous when sharp upswings get a little overcooked.

In the post-election phase of the quarter, investors began to consider something that we have been conscious of for at least two years. What if U.S. economic growth moved out of the funk of the last six years and began to grow at sustainably higher levels? What if Main Street outperforms Wall Street? How will stock owners react in an era when interest rates rise, millennial-age Americans have babies and buy homes, and the capital tied up in common stocks is demanded elsewhere from time to time?

Outlook 2017—How Markets Work

Certain economic concepts have been a source of frustration to investors over the years. The movement of bond prices up or down to bring existing bonds in line with prevailing interest rates would be one example. We could be seeing declining bond prices over the next ten years when interest rates adjust higher as the economy strengthens. Our reasoning for this will be dissected later in this piece.

The most baffling economic concept for many common stock investors could come into play over those same years. Common stocks perform the best when the economy is lousy and perform poorly when the economy is at its best. Why does poor macroeconomic performance correlate with strong stock markets, and why do strong economic times make for mediocre to poor index performance?

When we are in the depths of the deepest recessions, the Federal Reserve Board pumps money into the financial system and brings down short-term interest rates. In many cases, policy makers in Washington D.C. pull strings or pass legislation which provides fiscal stimulus. In effect, money is shoved into the system and the economy itself.

Despite dismal earnings growth or earnings contraction, stocks rise. In many cases these rallies are huge in percentage. Think of the explosive moves to the upside in 1982-1983, 1991, 2003 and 2009. In 2009, a truly unknown stock picker from Seattle running a small mutual fund was invited onto stock market business channels because they couldn’t find anyone else to be optimistic.

All the money created by the Fed needs to have a home because it is not being used to buy homes or cars or to grow businesses; all of which are activities inhibited by lousy economic conditions. Bonds and stocks receive a great deal of that money and are driven up in price. The most confounding aspect is that only 20% of investors consider themselves bullish at market lows in the middle of these recessions.1 Therefore, it is the movement of money into the system and the under-ownership of common stocks which drives these explosive markets.

The reverse of what happens in economic recessions occurs in strong economic environments. Business owners grow their business or buy property and dip into their common stock ownership for capital. Folks buy houses and cars, borrowing money which drives up the price (interest rates). The Federal Reserve raises shortterm interest rates as demand forces longer-term rates higher. Overall business optimism causes investors to be fully invested. The higher interest rates lure current income investors away from stocks paying competitive dividends.

At Smead Capital Management, we like to say that in good economic times, Main Street outperforms Wall Street. Where is the U.S. stock market on the time continuum between the pit of a recession/friendly Fed policies and booming economic times/unfriendly Fed tightening? Where are we on investor sentiment related to these cycles? As long-duration stock pickers and contrarians, we make no effort to time the stock market, but need to know where the money is currently residing. Here are our best thoughts:

1. We believe we are nowhere near a recession.

2. The Fed is tightening from very low interest rate levels.

3. 3. Professional sentiment for stocks is dangerously high on an intermediate basis.

4. We believe the U.S. economy is likely to surprise to the upside.

5. The S&P 500 Index is leveraged to technology and high P/E ratios—not to demographic tailwinds.

6. Stock pickers could earn their living. Top three tech stocks in the S&P 500 represent 8.13% of the S&P 500, whereas the top three homebuilders represent only 0.12%.

7. Investors are likely to get confounded in the next five years.

8. “Investing is the only sphere of life where victory, security and success is always to the minority and never to the majority.” —John Maynard Keynes

When the economy grows on a real basis at more than 4% for a significant period of time, excesses build up in the system and over-confidence begins to bedevil the future. At that point, we believe the Federal Reserve Board will tighten credit enough to invert the yield curve (short-term rates higher than long-term rates). Historically, when you get a booming economy, high demand for money, and an inverted yield curve, you get a bear market. In my years in the investment business, we inverted the yield curve in 1980-1982, 1987, 1994, 1999-2000 and 2006-2007. Only one of these episodes failed to see a 20% or greater decline in U.S. stock prices, which occurred in 1994 (we called it a “stealth” bear market). Three of those aforementioned declines were greater than 30% in the S&P 500 Index.2

So, where are we now? We believe the U.S. presidential election might be the watershed event that separates the era of lower interest rates/scared common stock investors from higher interest rates/enthusiastic common stock investors. We believe that earnings growth could be easier on Main Street and passive investing could get inhibited by rising interest rates and mute the index returns.

Our companies have balance sheet strength, consistent free cash flow and are less susceptible to the negative impact of higher interest rates. We are emphasizing industries and companies which would benefit from household formation—financials, home builders, and consumer discretionary firms. Lastly, we love an aging population and its basic need of more medicine over the next ten years. This next era in the stock market could very well be tougher, but our stock picking discipline is built for times such as these.

William Smead

Portfolio Manager

Tony Scherrer, CFA

Co-Portfolio Manager

Cole Smead, CFA

Co-Portfolio Manager

1 Investors Intelligence

2 Bloomberg The price-earnings ratio (P/E Ratio) measures a comapany's current share price relative to its per-share earnings.

The information contained herein represents the opinion of Smead Capital Management and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results, nor investment advice.

About the author:

Holly LaFon
I'm a financial journalist with a Master of Science in journalism from Medill at Northwestern University.

Visit Holly LaFon's Website

Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote)



Please leave your comment:

Performances of the stocks mentioned by Holly LaFon

User Generated Screeners

wigbertHigh FCF-M2
kosalmmuseBest one1
DBrizanall 2019Feb26
kosalmmuseBest one
DBrizanall 2019Feb25
MsDale*52-Week Low
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)