1. How to use GuruFocus - Tutorials
  2. What Is in the GuruFocus Premium Membership?
  3. A DIY Guide on How to Invest Using Guru Strategies
Rupert Hargreaves
Rupert Hargreaves
Articles (833)  | Author's Website |

Warren Buffett on the Benefit of Cash Vs. Index Funds

One of the unusual quirks of Berkshire Hathaway's balance sheet is that the conglomerate has such a substantial investment in Treasury bills

June 06, 2019 | About:

One of the unusual quirks of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A)(NYSE:BRK.B)'s balance sheet is that the conglomerate has such a substantial investment in Treasury bills.

With interest rates where they are today, Treasury bills are a particularly poor investment; especially when compared to the returns the S&P 500 index has generated over the past 10 years.

Having so many tens of billions of dollars invested in these low-yielding instruments has undoubtedly had an impact on Berkshire's returns since the financial crisis. In fact, one shareholder calculated that this conservative investment policy has cost Buffett and his investors around 12% of Berkshire's current book value.

"A good alternative would be for you to invest most of Berkshire's excess cash in a well-diversified index fund until you find an attractive acquisition or buy back stocks.

"Had you done that over the past 15 years, all the time keeping the $20 billion cash cushion you want, l estimate that at the end of 2018, the company's $112 billion balance in cash, cash equivalents, in short-term investments and Tbills, would've instead been worth about $155 billion.
The difference between the two figures is an opportunity cost equal to more than 12 percent of Berkshire's current book value." -- a question posed by Carol Loomis to Buffett at the 2019 Berkshire annual meeting as proposed by Mike Elzahr of Boca Raton, Florida

Index funds are not always the answer

This is an interesting perspective, and one and that deserves more attention.

Buffett could have produced much higher returns for himself and his shareholders if he had invested the cash in a low-cost index fund over the past decade. But this approach wouldn't have been entirely sensible because, while index funds are a great way to invest in the market over the long term, one of their major drawbacks is that they match the market.

To be able to take advantage of the opportunities presented by Mr. Market in a bear market, value investors have to have plenty of cash available to them. If you were to invest all of your money in an index fund, your money would drop in value in line with the market, therefore limiting your financial firepower to take advantage of the market environment and buy deeply discounted securities.

Buffett tried to get this point across when he answered the question. "I would say that if we'd instituted that policy in 2007 or '08, we might have been in a different position in terms of our ability to move late in 2008 or 2009," the Oracle of Omaha opined.

"You know, we committed $10 billion a week ago. And there are conditions under which... and they're not remote, they're not likely in any given week or month or year ... but there are conditions under which we could spend a hundred billion dollars very, very quickly. And if we did ... if those conditions existed ... it would be capital very well deployed, and much better than in an index fund," he went on to say before concluding:

"So, we've been -- we're operating on the basis that we will get chances to deploy capital. They will come in clumps in all likelihood. And they will come when other people don't want to allocate capital."

Cash is king

Index funds are an excellent instrument for regular investors, but they're not a solution to all investors' problems.

Buffett has been able to achieve the returns he has done over the years by waiting for the perfect opportunity and then acting quickly, often at times when the rest of the market is too scared to. You will never get this opportunity with index funds.

Yes, in hindsight, Buffett might have produced higher returns, but if the market fell 50% tomorrow, those returns would be wiped out, and he wouldn't have the capital available to take advantage of the once-in-a-decade opportunities available to him. This is something regular investors can learn from as well. Index funds do produce excellent returns over the long term, but in a rough market, there's only one asset class that always wins, and that is cash.

Disclosure: The author owns shares in Berkshire Hathaway.

Read more here: 

What Do Carl Icahn and Warren Buffett Have in Common 

Buffett's Next Buy Might Be Delta Air Lines 

The 'Red Flags' to Look For With Potential Value Traps 

Not a Premium Member of GuruFocus? Sign up for a free 7-day trial here.
 

About the author:

Rupert Hargreaves
Rupert is a committed value investor and regularly writes and invests following the principles set out by Benjamin Graham. He is the editor and co-owner of Hidden Value Stocks, a quarterly investment newsletter aimed at institutional investors.

Rupert holds qualifications from the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment and the CFA Society of the UK. He covers everything value investing for ValueWalk and other sites on a freelance basis.

Visit Rupert Hargreaves's Website


Rating: 4.2/5 (6 votes)

Voters:

Comments

ns1233
Ns1233 - 2 weeks ago    Report SPAM

Granted, in periods of a generally declining market, Buffett's money market allocation is a boost to returns compared to if that money were in a market index fund. And the opposite is true in a generally increasing market. In the scenario where the market falls 50% tomorrow, if Buffett had used an S&P 500 index fund instead of money market investments, he could still sell some or all of his remaining index fund position to buy stocks he believed were a better value than the fund.

The key question is whether over the very long term (e.g. over Buffet's whole career) he would have done significantly better if he had kept all his actual money market investment allocation at each point in time in an S&P 500 index fund. I submit to you he would have done significantly better. Suppose that over his whole career his average money market allocation was 10% and that that allocation underperformed a very low-cost S&P 500 index fund by 6% annualized. If, instead, he had kept his money market allocation percentage at each point in time in the S&P 500 index fund, his annualized returns would likely have been about 0.6% higher.

Please leave your comment:


Performances of the stocks mentioned by Rupert Hargreaves


User Generated Screeners


pjmason14Momentum
pascal.van.garsseHigh FCF-M2
kosalmmuse6
kosalmmuseBest one1
DBrizanall 2019Feb26
kosalmmuseBest one
DBrizanall 2019Feb25
kosalmmuseNice
kosalmmusehan
MsDale*52-Week Low
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}
FEEDBACK