Switch to:
Also traded in: Canada, Germany, Sweden

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt No Debt
BLKPF's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
90% of the 470 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.66 vs. BLKPF: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
BLKPF' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: No Debt Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity-to-Asset 0.86
BLKPF's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
88% of the 428 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. BLKPF: 0.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
BLKPF' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.85  Med: 0.85 Max: 0.97
Current: 0.86
-0.85
0.97
Interest Coverage 0.07
BLKPF's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
100% of the 239 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 24.79 vs. BLKPF: 0.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
BLKPF' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 40.78 Max: 74.43
Current: 0.07
0.07
74.43
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 1.26
WACC vs ROIC
12.35%
0.02%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 0.12
BLKPF's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
66% of the 439 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -23.06 vs. BLKPF: 0.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
BLKPF' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -109.13  Med: -8.39 Max: 15.01
Current: 0.12
-109.13
15.01
Net Margin % -2.16
BLKPF's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
65% of the 437 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -29.01 vs. BLKPF: -2.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
BLKPF' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -68.88  Med: -9.56 Max: 10.69
Current: -2.16
-68.88
10.69
ROE % -0.45
BLKPF's ROE % is ranked higher than
68% of the 430 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.78 vs. BLKPF: -0.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
BLKPF' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.25  Med: -1.59 Max: 4.33
Current: -0.45
-17.25
4.33
ROA % -0.37
BLKPF's ROA % is ranked higher than
71% of the 513 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.02 vs. BLKPF: -0.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
BLKPF' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14  Med: -1.31 Max: 3.6
Current: -0.37
-14
3.6
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -0.08
BLKPF's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
69% of the 486 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.39 vs. BLKPF: -0.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
BLKPF' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.16  Med: -2.22 Max: 5.18
Current: -0.08
-17.16
5.18
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -25.00
BLKPF's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
57% of the 376 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -21.30 vs. BLKPF: -25.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
BLKPF' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -17.25 Max: 889.9
Current: -25
0
889.9
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -33.10
BLKPF's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
67% of the 309 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -20.60 vs. BLKPF: -33.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
BLKPF' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33.1  Med: 30.2 Max: 90.1
Current: -33.1
-33.1
90.1
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with BlackPearl Resources Inc $BLKPF.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» BLKPF's 30-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P    NAICS: 211111    SIC: 711
Compare:OTCPK:TNGRY, NYSE:BBG, AMEX:EPM, NAS:AREX, OTCPK:KRNGF, OTCPK:FOLGF, AMEX:LLEX, AMEX:GST, NYSE:KRP, OTCPK:FTMR, OTCPK:SHASF, NYSE:WTI, NAS:ISRL, OTCPK:CRLFF, NYSE:GNE, OTCPK:YGRAF, NAS:AXAS, OTCPK:SUNYF, AMEX:SNMP, AMEX:MCF » details
Traded in other countries:PXX.Canada, 41P.Germany, PXXS SDB.Sweden,
Headquarter Location:Canada
BlackPearl Resources Inc is engaged in the business of oil and gas exploration, development and production. The Company's focus is on heavy oil and oil sands projects in Western Canada.

BlackPearl Resources Inc., formerly known as Pearl Exploration and Production Ltd. was incorporated on October 15, 1984. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, development and production of heavy oil and bitumen located in Canada. Its current production is from conventional and EOR heavy oil projects; however, the Company is actively developing oil projects that utilize SAGD extraction methods. The Company's properties include: Onion Lake, Saskatchewan; Mooney, Alberta; Blackrod, Alberta. Onion Lake is a conventional heavy oil property that also has the potential for thermal development on a portion of the lands. Blackrod is 100% owned in situ oil sands project located south of Fort McMurray, in the Athabasca oil sands region of northern Alberta. Mooney is a conventional heavy oil property located in north-central Alberta. The Company has 100% working interest in approximately 92 sections in the Mooney field. The Company also holds interests in Fishing Lake and Salt Lake. The Company is subject to various Canadian federal, provincial, territorial, and local laws and regulations.

Top Ranked Articles about BlackPearl Resources Inc

Blackrod SAGD Project Receives Regulatory Approval

CALGARY, ALBERTA--(Marketwired - Sep 16, 2016) - BlackPearl Resources Inc. ("BlackPearl" or the "Company") (TSX:PXX)(OMX:PXXS) is pleased to announce that its 80,000 barrel per day commercial development application at Blackrod, located in the Athabasca Oil Sands, has received regulatory and environmental approval from the Alberta Energy Regulator and the Alberta government. John Festival, President and CEO of BlackPearl commented that "in addition to extensive delineation drilling and seismic coverage over the application area we have run a successful SAGD pilot at Blackrod during the last four years that validated the SAGD process on our lease. In conjunction with this work we filed a commercial development application and after a long and thorough review of our proposed development we are very pleased with the decision of the regulators and the provincial government. With a successful pilot, which has averaged in excess of 550 barrels of oil per day over the last 16 months with a steam oil ratio of 2.8, and commercial development approval our next steps are to secure funding for the project. We believe the long life, low decline nature of these assets provide a very attractive opportunity. This approval also represents a major step towards our long term strategy to transition to a significant thermal oil producer." At December 31, 2015 our independent reserves evaluator assigned 180 million barrels of proved plus probable bitumen reserves to our Blackrod leases and an additional 453 million barrels of contingent resource (risked, best estimate). At 80,000 barrels per day, these reserves and resources represent a production life in excess of 20 years. Forward-looking Statements This release contains certain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively referred to as "forward-looking statements") within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. All statements other than statements of historic fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by such words as "seek", "anticipate", "plan", "continue", "estimate", "expect", "may", "will", "project", "potential", "targeting", "intend", "could", "might", "should", "believe" or similar words suggesting future events or future performance. In particular, but without limiting the foregoing, this report contains forward-looking statements pertaining to estimated reserves and contingent resources of our Blackrod SAGD project. The forward-looking statements in this document reflect certain assumptions and expectations by management. The key assumptions that have been made in connection with these forward-looking statements include the continuation of current or, where applicable, assumed industry conditions, the continuation of existing tax, royalty and regulatory regimes, commodity price and cost assumptions, the continued availability of cash flow or financing on acceptable terms to fund the Company's capital programs, the accuracy of the estimate of the Company's reserves and resource volumes and that BlackPearl will conduct its operations in a manner consistent with past operations. Although management considers these assumptions to be reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may prove to be incorrect. By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, risks associated with fluctuations in market prices for crude oil, natural gas and diluent; risks related to the exploration, development and production of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs reserves; general economic, market and business conditions; substantial capital requirements; uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves and resources; extent of, and cost of compliance with, government laws and regulations and the effect of changes in such laws and regulations from time to time; the need to obtain regulatory approvals on projects before development commences; environmental risks and hazards and the cost of compliance with environmental regulations; aboriginal claims; inherent risks and hazards with operations such as fire, explosion, blowouts, mechanical or pipe failure, cratering, oil spills, vandalism and other dangerous conditions; potential cost overruns; variations in foreign exchange rates; diluent supply shortages; competition for capital, equipment, new leases, pipeline capacity and skilled personnel; uncertainties inherent in the SAGD bitumen and ASP recovery processes; credit risks associated with counterparties; the failure of the Company or the holder of licenses, leases and permits to meet requirements of such licenses, leases and permits; reliance on third parties for pipelines and other infrastructure; changes in royalty regimes; failure to accurately estimate abandonment and reclamation costs; inaccurate estimates and assumptions by management; effectiveness of internal controls; the potential lack of available drilling equipment and other restrictions; failure to obtain or keep key personnel; title deficiencies with the Company's assets; geo-political risks; risks that the Company does not have adequate insurance coverage; risk of litigation and risks arising from future acquisition activities. Further information regarding these risk factors and others may be found under "Risk Factors" in the Annual Information Form. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that the actual results achieved will vary from the information provided herein and the variations could be material. Readers are also cautioned that the foregoing list of assumptions, risks and factors is not exhaustive. Consequently, there is no assurance by the Company that actual results achieved will be the same in whole or in part as those set out in the forward-looking statements. Furthermore, the forward-looking statements contained in this document are made as of the date hereof, and the Company does not undertake any obligation, except as required by applicable securities legislation, to update publicly or to revise any of the included forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The forward-looking statements contained herein are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. Contingent resources are defined in the COGE Handbook as those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using established technology or technology under development, but are not currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more contingencies. Contingencies may include factors such as economic, legal, environmental, political and regulatory matters or a lack of markets. There is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any of the contingent resources. Best estimate (P50) is a classification of estimated resources described in the COGE Handbook as being considered to be the best estimate of the quantity that will be actually recovered. It is equally likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the best estimate. If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the best estimate. Please refer to our Annual Information Form for a more detailed discussion of our contingent resources and the contingencies for each property. The information in this release is subject to the disclosure requirements of BlackPearl Resources Inc. under the EU Market Abuse Regulation and/or the Swedish Securities Market Act. This information was publicly communicated on September 15, 2016 at 11:00 p.m. Mountain Time.





BlackPearl Resources Inc
John Festival
President and Chief Executive Officer
(403) 215-8313
BlackPearl Resources Inc
Don Cook
Chief Financial Officer
(403) 215-8313
BlackPearl Resources Inc
Robert Eriksson
Investor Relations Sweden
46 701-112615




Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 39.84
BLKPF's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
80% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 19.19 vs. BLKPF: 39.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 0.53
BLKPF's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
79% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. BLKPF: 0.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
BLKPF' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 1.13 Max: 4.59
Current: 0.53
0.19
4.59
PS Ratio 2.58
BLKPF's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 403 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.09 vs. BLKPF: 2.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
BLKPF' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46  Med: 3.79 Max: 114.13
Current: 2.58
0.46
114.13
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 10.65
BLKPF's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
58% of the 131 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 13.75 vs. BLKPF: 10.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
BLKPF' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.65  Med: 15.05 Max: 26.82
Current: 10.65
10.65
26.82
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 6.27
BLKPF's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
52% of the 273 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.66 vs. BLKPF: 6.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
BLKPF' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41  Med: 10.19 Max: 68
Current: 6.27
1.41
68
EV-to-EBITDA 7.06
BLKPF's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
67% of the 264 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 11.17 vs. BLKPF: 7.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
BLKPF' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -191.9  Med: 9.9 Max: 707.2
Current: 7.06
-191.9
707.2
Current Ratio 1.17
BLKPF's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
52% of the 500 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. BLKPF: 1.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
BLKPF' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.95 Max: 48.76
Current: 1.17
0.03
48.76
Quick Ratio 1.16
BLKPF's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 499 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.19 vs. BLKPF: 1.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
BLKPF' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.95 Max: 48.63
Current: 1.16
0.03
48.63
Days Inventory 0.54
BLKPF's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
98% of the 203 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 28.39 vs. BLKPF: 0.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
BLKPF' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.83 Max: 3
Current: 0.54
0.54
3
Days Sales Outstanding 37.77
BLKPF's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
70% of the 389 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 51.71 vs. BLKPF: 37.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
BLKPF' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17.82  Med: 36.65 Max: 89.54
Current: 37.77
17.82
89.54

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -3.80
BLKPF's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
70% of the 378 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -10.50 vs. BLKPF: -3.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
BLKPF' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -161.1  Med: -10.1 Max: 0.5
Current: -3.8
-161.1
0.5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.53
BLKPF's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
82% of the 406 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. BLKPF: 0.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
BLKPF' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 1.58 Max: 29.85
Current: 0.53
0.35
29.85
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 6.82
BLKPF's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
86% of the 119 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. BLKPF: 6.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
BLKPF' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.86  Med: 3.07 Max: 70.5
Current: 6.82
0.86
70.5
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.68
BLKPF's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
64% of the 373 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.89 vs. BLKPF: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
BLKPF' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 1.33 Max: 135
Current: 0.68
0.21
135
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -0.18
BLKPF's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
66% of the 516 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -4.43 vs. BLKPF: -0.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
BLKPF' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -100.2  Med: -1.5 Max: 25.3
Current: -0.18
-100.2
25.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -21.50
BLKPF's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
60% of the 178 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -16.06 vs. BLKPF: -21.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
BLKPF' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -93.1  Med: -10.1 Max: 3.3
Current: -21.5
-93.1
3.3

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $97.69
EPS (TTM) $ -0.01
Beta1.46
Short Percentage of Float0.00%
52-Week Range $0.71 - 1.44
Shares Outstanding (Mil)336.25

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 104 124 194
EPS ($) 0.02 0.04 0.07
EPS without NRI ($) 0.02 0.04 0.07
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}