Switch to:
Also traded in: Brazil, Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Equity-to-Asset -0.01
NYSE:CHK's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
90% of the 423 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.54 vs. NYSE:CHK: -0.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:CHK' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.33  Med: 0.34 Max: 0.56
Current: -0.01
-0.33
0.56
Debt-to-Equity -60.57
NYSE:CHK's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 301 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.46 vs. NYSE:CHK: -60.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
NYSE:CHK' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -301.53  Med: 0.93 Max: 15.09
Current: -60.57
-301.53
15.09
Debt-to-EBITDA 4.17
NYSE:CHK's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
69% of the 255 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.98 vs. NYSE:CHK: 4.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
NYSE:CHK' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.27  Med: 2.61 Max: 4.2
Current: 4.17
-3.27
4.2
Interest Coverage 3.07
NYSE:CHK's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
73% of the 295 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 10.62 vs. NYSE:CHK: 3.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:CHK' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.07  Med: 19.74 Max: 141.53
Current: 3.07
3.07
141.53
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: -0.73
Beneish M-Score: -3.02
WACC vs ROIC
8.64%
16.06%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 15.54
NYSE:CHK's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
65% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -2.34 vs. NYSE:CHK: 15.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:CHK' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.89  Med: 15.5 Max: 36.86
Current: 15.54
-12.89
36.86
Net Margin % 7.16
NYSE:CHK's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
64% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -4.39 vs. NYSE:CHK: 7.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:CHK' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -114.13  Med: 4.49 Max: 18.94
Current: 7.16
-114.13
18.94
ROA % 5.63
NYSE:CHK's ROA % is ranked higher than
85% of the 497 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.08 vs. NYSE:CHK: 5.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:CHK' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -50.17  Med: 1.74 Max: 7.46
Current: 5.63
-50.17
7.46
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 10.94
NYSE:CHK's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
82% of the 466 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -2.70 vs. NYSE:CHK: 10.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:CHK' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -80.19  Med: 4.47 Max: 12.96
Current: 10.94
-80.19
12.96
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -29.50
NYSE:CHK's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
66% of the 373 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -19.90 vs. NYSE:CHK: -29.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:CHK' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.5  Med: 15.85 Max: 196.3
Current: -29.5
-29.5
196.3
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -31.50
NYSE:CHK's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
77% of the 340 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.70 vs. NYSE:CHK: -31.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:CHK' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 3.2 Max: 257.9
Current: -31.5
0
257.9
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -21.60
NYSE:CHK's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
68% of the 300 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -2.90 vs. NYSE:CHK: -21.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:CHK' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -23.5 Max: 145.3
Current: -21.6
0
145.3
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with Chesapeake Energy Corp NYSE:CHK.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:CHK's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2019-02-23 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2017

CHK Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Joel Greenblatt 119,983 sh (+374.92%)
Charles Brandes 5,065,181 sh (+15.27%)
John Hussman Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Mason Hawkins 42,912,004 sh (-1.45%)
Arnold Schneider 5,658,855 sh (-17.71%)
Bill Nygren 20,000,000 sh (-33.33%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 11,043,700 sh (-33.37%)
Jeremy Grantham 195,402 sh (-52.39%)
David Tepper 766,000 sh (-78.52%)
» More
Q4 2017

CHK Guru Trades in Q4 2017

David Dreman 752 sh (New)
Pioneer Investments 19,735 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 505,800 sh (New)
Arnold Schneider 10,231,525 sh (+80.81%)
Caxton Associates 400,000 sh (unchged)
Bill Nygren 20,000,000 sh (unchged)
David Tepper Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 10,735,800 sh (-2.79%)
Jeremy Grantham 187,602 sh (-3.99%)
Mason Hawkins 33,090,194 sh (-22.89%)
Charles Brandes 2,946,332 sh (-41.83%)
» More
Q1 2018

CHK Guru Trades in Q1 2018

Joel Greenblatt 22,563 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 220,502 sh (+17.54%)
Arnold Schneider 10,731,525 sh (+4.89%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 10,795,200 sh (+0.55%)
David Dreman 752 sh (unchged)
Mason Hawkins Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Pioneer Investments Sold Out
Charles Brandes 2,777,245 sh (-5.74%)
Bill Nygren 15,000,000 sh (-25.00%)
» More
Q2 2018

CHK Guru Trades in Q2 2018

Pioneer Investments 65,800 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 85,494 sh (+278.91%)
Bill Nygren 20,000,000 sh (+33.33%)
Jeremy Grantham 277,902 sh (+26.03%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 10,289,879 sh (-4.68%)
Charles Brandes 2,525,430 sh (-9.07%)
Arnold Schneider 8,998,319 sh (-16.15%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CHK

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

Guru Date Action
Impact Price Range
(Average)*
Change from Average Comment Current Shares
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Preferred stocks of Chesapeake Energy Corp

SymbolPriceYieldDescription
CHKDG.PFD60.008.33Conv Pfd Shs
CHKVZ.PFD448.750.005 3/4 % Cum Conv Pfd Shs Series -A- Reg-S
CHKDH.PFD80.500.005 % Conv Pfd Shs -144A-
CHKpD.PFD55.158.164.50% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
CHKDP.PFD605.459.505 3/4 % Pfd Shs
CHKDJ.PFD295.000.005 3/4 % Cum Non-Voting Conv Pfd Shs Reg-S
4GGB.PFD.Singapore0.000.005 3/4 % Conv Pfd Shs Series -A- -144A-
4GJB.PFD.Singapore0.000.005 3/4 % Cum Non-Voting Conv Pfd Shs Reg-S
CHKVP.PFD575.0010.005 3/4 % Cum Conv Pfd Shs Series -A-
CKRGZ.PFD0.000.005 3/4 % Pfd Shs -144A
CHKWZ.PFD0.000.005 3/4 % Conv Pfd Shs Series -A- -144A-

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P    NAICS: 211120    SIC: 1311
Compare:TSX:PXT, ASX:BPT, NYSE:KOS, NYSE:SM, SZSE:002221, NYSE:CPE, NYSE:WRD, NYSE:LPI, TSX:ERF, NAS:XOG, NYSE:SWN, MIC:RNFT, NYSE:JAG, OTCPK:LNGG, TSX:WCP, NAS:TELL, HKSE:00467, NAS:VNOM, NYSE:CNX, OSL:DNO » details
Traded in other countries:CHKE34.Brazil, CS1.Germany, CHK.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
Chesapeake Energy Corp is a natural gas and oil exploration, development, acquisition and production company. It also owns an oil and natural gas marketing business. Its portfolio includes unconventional oil and natural gas assets in U.S. onshore plays.

Chesapeake Energy, based in Oklahoma City, explores for, produces, and markets natural gas, oil, and natural gas liquids in the U.S. It focuses on unconventional plays, with large positions in the Barnett, Eagle Ford, Haynesville, Utica, and Marcellus shales, as well as leasehold in a number of liquids-rich basins. Chesapeake controls close to 8 million net acres across its properties. At year-end 2015, the firm's proven reserves totaled 9 trillion cubic feet equivalent, with daily production of 4.1 Bcfe. Natural gas made up 72% of production.

Guru Investment Theses on Chesapeake Energy Corp

Longleaf Partners Comments on Chesapeake Energy - Jan 22, 2018

Chesapeake Energy (NYSE:CHK) (-44%,-2.07%,-8%,-0.17%), one of the largest U.S. producers of natural gas and oil, was one of the Fund’s few detractors in 2017 during a tough market for closing energy asset sales. Overshadowing strong operational performance by CEO Doug Lawler and his management team, domestic gas oversupply weighed down strip prices. Chesapeake made progress delineating some of its newer plays, but the market continued to underestimate the company’s ability to sell meaningful assets, as it has done multiple times in the past.



From Longleaf Partners' 2017 shareholder letter.



Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Longleaf Partners Comments on Chesapeake Energy - Jul 18, 2017

Chesapeake Energy (NYSE:CHK) (-16%, -0.63%), one of the largest U.S. producers of natural gas, oil, and natural gas liquids, was a detractor. Weak commodity prices impacted the oil and gas group overall, but what was most striking about Chesapeake was the stock price’s extremely high correlation to oil prices instead of natural gas prices this quarter. Although Chesapeake’s production is primarily weighted to gas, a meaningful percentage of the company’s current earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) comes from oil. Additionally, oil’s importance to Chesapeake going forward has increased with much of current drilling focused on oil, especially in the Powder River Basin and Eagle Ford Shale. CEO Doug Lawler and his team will make prudent asset sales when the price and time are right, as they have done in the past, but the lack of such reported sales this quarter also weighed on the stock price.



From Longleaf Partners Fund second quarter 2017 shareholder letter.



Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Longleaf Partners Comments on Chesapeake Energy - Apr 14, 2017

Chesapeake Energy (NYSE:CHK) (-15%; -0.70%), one of the largest U.S. producers of natural gas, oil, and natural gas liquids, was the largest detractor in the quarter. At the macro level, declines in oil and gas prices pressured the stock. We use the futures strip for both commodities in our appraisal of Chesapeake, even though they are currently trading below the global energy industry’s long run marginal costs. CEO Doug Lawler further improved the company’s financial strength and flexibility, closing two Haynesville deals and reporting another solid operational quarter. We believe he and his team will continue to execute additional asset sales and maintain both operating and capital expense discipline.



From Longleaf Partners Fund first quarter 2017 commentary.



Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Bruce Berkowitz Comments on Chesapeake Energy - Jan 31, 2017

In early 2016, news on all things related to oil and natural gas devoted little coverage to how declining commodity prices were forcing energy companies to reduce supply, lower debt, and cut operating costs. Time and again, history shows that a commodity price forges its own anchor. Our credit investments in Chesapeake Energy (NYSE:CHK) performed exceptionally well in 2016 due to the combination of operational efficiencies driving down unit costs, higher natural gas prices, and success with debt buybacks and asset sales.



From Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio)'s Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio) annual shareholder letter 2016.

Check out Bruce Berkowitz latest stock trades

Longleaf Partners Comments on Chesapeake Energy - Jan 24, 2017

Chesapeake Energy (NYSE:CHK) (+377%; +8.46%), one of the largest U.S. producers of natural gas, oil, and natural gas liquids, was the Fund’s top contributor to performance in 2016 and gained an additional 12% in the fourth quarter. Earlier in the year, we transitioned our equity position into heavily discounted bonds and convertible preferred stock, which offered equity-like returns higher in the capital structure and a potentially faster payback. As the bonds rose close to par, we exited them. At the end of the third quarter, we converted all of our appreciated preferred securities into common stock for an attractive premium. Over the course of the year, management executed beyond expectations, selling various assets, improving the balance sheet through discounted debt repurchases, reducing operating and capital expenditures, and renegotiating midstream contracts. The most recent asset sales in the fourth quarter included a portion of the company’s properties in the Haynesville Shale in northern Louisiana for proceeds of approximately $915 million. Signed or closed asset sales reached $2.5 billion in 2016, exceeding management’s original target of $1 billion. To further strengthen its balance sheet, the company secured a term loan and convertible debt offering, which raised more capital at better terms than expected. Since the beginning of 2012, Chesapeake has reduced debt by 50%, and its remaining fixed liabilities should be well covered in the coming years. The company has targeted a two times net debt over earnings before interests, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) with cash flow neutrality by 2018 and 5 to 15% of annual production growth by 2020. We salute CEO Doug Lawler and Chesapeake’s board, with Brad Martin as Chairman, for their successful pursuit of shareholder value in the face of massive headwinds.





From Longleaf Partners' fourth quarter 2016 commentary.



Check out Mason Hawkins latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Chesapeake Energy Corp

WILDHORSE RESOURCE INVESTOR ALERT BY THE FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL OF LOUISIANA: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Investigates Adequacy of Price and Process in Proposed Sale of WildHorse Resource Development Corporation - WRD
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Notifies Holders Of Its 2.25% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes Due 2038 Of Their Repurchase Option
ALERT: Rowley Law PLLC is Investigating Proposed Acquisition of WildHorse Resource Development Corporation
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Accelerates Strategic Plan With Acquisition Of WildHorse Resource Development Corporation For A Combination Of Chesapeake Common Stock And Cash
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Declares Quarterly Preferred Stock Dividends And Provides 2018 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call Information
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Announces Pricing Of $1.25 Billion Senior Notes Offering
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Announces $1.25 Billion Senior Notes Offering
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Announces Amended And Restated Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
Report: Exploring Fundamental Drivers Behind Chesapeake Energy, Cenovus Energy, Sunrun, Axcelis Technologies, Advanced Disposal Services, and Cars — New Horizons, Emerging Trends, and Upcoming Developments
Chesapeake Energy Corporation Announces The Appointment Of Mark A. Edmunds To Board Of Directors

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 5.42
CHK's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
87% of the 208 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 11.83 vs. CHK: 5.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
CHK' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.81  Med: 14.67 Max: 79.95
Current: 5.42
2.81
79.95
Forward PE Ratio 4.12
CHK's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
96% of the 137 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 16.64 vs. CHK: 4.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 5.42
CHK's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
88% of the 210 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 12.65 vs. CHK: 5.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
CHK' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.81  Med: 14.67 Max: 79.95
Current: 5.42
2.81
79.95
PS Ratio 0.35
CHK's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
93% of the 402 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.73 vs. CHK: 0.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
CHK' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 0.9 Max: 5.86
Current: 0.35
0.08
5.86
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 1.64
CHK's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
71% of the 279 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.94 vs. CHK: 1.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
CHK' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.85  Med: 3.44 Max: 91.49
Current: 1.64
0.85
91.49
EV-to-EBIT 12.61
CHK's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
59% of the 225 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 12.76 vs. CHK: 12.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CHK' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -38.8  Med: 10.5 Max: 32.8
Current: 12.61
-38.8
32.8
EV-to-EBITDA 6.32
CHK's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
64% of the 298 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 7.99 vs. CHK: 6.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CHK' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.1  Med: 6.3 Max: 91.3
Current: 6.32
-9.1
91.3
EV-to-Revenue 1.54
CHK's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
86% of the 417 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.03 vs. CHK: 1.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
CHK' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.9  Med: 2.1 Max: 9
Current: 1.54
0.9
9
Current Ratio 0.41
CHK's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
73% of the 479 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. CHK: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CHK' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 0.74 Max: 3.11
Current: 0.41
0.3
3.11
Quick Ratio 0.41
CHK's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
71% of the 479 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. CHK: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CHK' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 0.73 Max: 3.05
Current: 0.41
0.3
3.05
Days Sales Outstanding 31.26
CHK's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
70% of the 375 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 48.34 vs. CHK: 31.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CHK' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 19.9  Med: 37.91 Max: 76.93
Current: 31.26
19.9
76.93
Days Payable 29.27
CHK's Days Payable is ranked lower than
61% of the 251 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 81.91 vs. CHK: 29.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CHK' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 27.3  Med: 50.44 Max: 446.82
Current: 29.27
27.3
446.82

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -100.00
CHK's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
71% of the 103 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -38.10 vs. CHK: -100.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
CHK' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -60.3 Max: 48.1
Current: -100
0
48.1
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -11.00
CHK's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
51% of the 369 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -11.00 vs. CHK: -11.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CHK' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.6  Med: -12.3 Max: 0
Current: -11
-29.6
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.38
CHK's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
83% of the 342 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.85 vs. CHK: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
CHK' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.15  Med: 1.82 Max: 12.56
Current: 0.38
0.15
12.56
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 7.93
CHK's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
82% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.99 vs. CHK: 7.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
CHK' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -131.5  Med: 5.5 Max: 15.9
Current: 7.93
-131.5
15.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -300.91
CHK's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
95% of the 186 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -15.06 vs. CHK: -300.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
CHK' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -300.91  Med: -37.2 Max: 5.8
Current: -300.91
-300.91
5.8

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $9,681.00
EPS (TTM) $ 0.66
Beta3.30
Volatility66.46%
52-Week Range $2.53 - 5.60
Shares Outstanding (Mil)913.71

Analyst Estimate

Dec18 Dec19 Dec20
Revenue (Mil $) 7,008 6,686 7,457
EBIT (Mil $) 1,161 1,566 2,047
EBITDA (Mil $) 2,315 2,681 3,248
EPS ($) 0.61 0.87 1.02
EPS without NRI ($) 0.61 0.87 1.02
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 77
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}