Switch to:
Also traded in: Canada, Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 2.46
CLS's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
58% of the 2280 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.55 vs. CLS: 2.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
CLS' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 3.69 Max: No Debt
Current: 2.46
Equity-to-Asset 0.45
CLS's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
69% of the 2236 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. CLS: 0.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
CLS' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.5 Max: 0.74
Current: 0.45
0.23
0.74
Interest Coverage 15.21
CLS's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
66% of the 1932 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 47.82 vs. CLS: 15.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CLS' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.59  Med: 18.32 Max: 46.07
Current: 15.21
1.59
46.07
Piotroski F-Score: 9
Altman Z-Score: 2.80
Beneish M-Score: -2.59
WACC vs ROIC
5.05%
13.70%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 2.58
CLS's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
59% of the 2256 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 4.18 vs. CLS: 2.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
CLS' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.32  Med: 2 Max: 2.79
Current: 2.58
-9.32
2.79
Net Margin % 2.17
CLS's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
56% of the 2255 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.96 vs. CLS: 2.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
CLS' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.38  Med: 1.68 Max: 2.67
Current: 2.17
-9.38
2.67
ROE % 11.07
CLS's ROE % is ranked higher than
71% of the 2232 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 5.73 vs. CLS: 11.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
CLS' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -46.69  Med: 7.44 Max: 13.4
Current: 11.07
-46.69
13.4
ROA % 4.82
CLS's ROA % is ranked higher than
63% of the 2285 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.93 vs. CLS: 4.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
CLS' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19.43  Med: 3.65 Max: 6.38
Current: 4.82
-19.43
6.38
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 18.65
CLS's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
67% of the 2279 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 10.95 vs. CLS: 18.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
CLS' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -83.77  Med: 16.32 Max: 27.33
Current: 18.65
-83.77
27.33
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 18.80
CLS's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
88% of the 2049 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.30 vs. CLS: 18.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
CLS' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.7  Med: 2.1 Max: 18.8
Current: 18.8
-15.7
18.8
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 24.70
CLS's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
77% of the 1699 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 7.20 vs. CLS: 24.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
CLS' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.3  Med: 19.8 Max: 39.3
Current: 24.7
-1.3
39.3
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 23.00
CLS's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
71% of the 1566 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 5.00 vs. CLS: 23.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
CLS' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -76.6  Med: 1.3 Max: 151.4
Current: 23
-76.6
151.4
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with Celestica Inc $CLS.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» CLS's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-07-21 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

CLS Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 757,388 sh (+3804.06%)
Donald Smith 5,314,834 sh (+11.52%)
Jeremy Grantham 703,100 sh (+1.53%)
David Dreman Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
» More
Q3 2016

CLS Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Scott Black 148,391 sh (New)
Donald Smith 5,347,479 sh (+0.61%)
Jeremy Grantham 631,500 sh (-10.18%)
Jim Simons 498,188 sh (-34.22%)
» More
Q4 2016

CLS Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Joel Greenblatt 17,459 sh (New)
Jim Simons 674,965 sh (+35.48%)
Scott Black 177,851 sh (+19.85%)
Jeremy Grantham 544,091 sh (-13.84%)
Donald Smith 4,006,060 sh (-25.09%)
» More
Q1 2017

CLS Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Chuck Royce 1,679,714 sh (New)
Jim Simons 708,788 sh (+5.01%)
Scott Black 184,010 sh (+3.46%)
Jeremy Grantham 445,600 sh (-18.10%)
Joel Greenblatt 13,223 sh (-24.26%)
Donald Smith 2,856,299 sh (-28.70%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CLS

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Computer Hardware » Contract Manufacturers    NAICS: 334111    SIC: 3352
Compare:NAS:PLXS, NAS:TTMI, NYSE:BHE, AMEX:IEC, NAS:SGMA, NAS:SMTX, OTCPK:IEHC, NAS:ELTK, NYSE:JBL, NAS:FLEX » details
Traded in other countries:CLS.Canada, CTW.Germany,
Headquarter Location:Canada
Celestica Inc delivers supply chain solutions to customers in the communications, consumer, diversified (industrial, aerospace & defense, healthcare, solar, semiconductor equipment & other), servers and storage end markets.

Celestica is a US-based EMS company that provides a range of services from design, engineering, and assembly to testing and reverse logistics. The company's manufacturing footprint of 6.4 million square feet is spread across the Americas (28%), EMEA (8%), and APAC (64%) and has generated revenue of $5.6 billion.

Top Ranked Articles about Celestica Inc

Celestica Recognizes Suppliers With Its 2015 Total Cost of Ownership Supplier Awards
TORONTO, ON--(Marketwired - June 17, 2016) - Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) (TSX: CLS), a global leader in the delivery of end-to-end product lifecycle solutions, today announced the winners of its 2015 Total Cost of Ownership (TCOO™) Supplier Awards. The awards honour suppliers who provide the best TCOO™ performance to Celestica and support the company's overall business objectives.Celestica is pleased to congratulate the 2015 TCOO™ Supplier Award recipients:Best TCOO™ Score Award: Molex, LLC.Best Distributor Partner Award: Avnet Electronics MarketingBest IT Partner Award: Sisense Inc.Partner for Growth Award: Sistemas de Interconexión S.A.Best Design Partner, Custom Mechanicals Award: Delta Electronics, Inc.Best Design Partner, Electronics Award: Broadcom LimitedBest Technical Design Solutions Award: Amphenol FCI and Intel CorporationBest Sustainability Partner Award: ON SemiconductorBest Custom Mechanical Partner Award: LFE CorporationBest Interconnect Passives and Electromechanical Partner Award: Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.Best Semiconductor Partner Award: NXP SemiconductorsBest Renewable Energy Partner Award: Xinyi Solar (North America) Inc.Best Indirect Services Partner Award: Adecco USA Inc. and Adecco Employment Services LimitedBest Regional TCOO™ Score Award, Asia: Fagerdala Singapore Pte Ltd.Best Regional TCOO™ Partner Award, Americas and Europe: Innovative Packing SolutionsIn addition, Celestica would like to recognize the following honourees who made a significant contribution to its supply chain goals in 2015:Best TCOO™ Score Award category: LFE Corporation and Yan Tat CorporationBest Distributor Partner Award category: Arrow Electronics, Inc. and Future ElectronicsBest IT Partner Award category: IBM Global ServicesPartner for Growth Award category: Broadcom Limited and Well-Tech Electronics Best Technical Design Solutions Award category: Fagerdala Singapore Pte. Ltd. and TTM Technologies Inc.Best Sustainability Partner Award category: NXP Semiconductors and Taiyo Yuden Co., Ltd.Best Regional TCOO™ Partner Award category, Asia: Ideal Jacobs (Xiamen) CorporationBest Regional TCOO™ Partner Award category, Americas and Europe: Arnold Industries Cork Ltd."We are pleased to recognize this year's TCOO™ award winners and honourees for their exceptional achievements in helping us to drive speed, flexibility and innovation through our supply chain," said Paul Blom, Chief Procurement Officer, Celestica. "These companies play an important role in our future as we work together to build a more intelligent and flexible supply chain to enable our customers' success and to meet the market demands of tomorrow."Celestica's TCOO™ Supplier Awards program celebrates the achievements of the top performers in Celestica's global network of over 4,000 suppliers. Celestica's TCOO™ system is focused on evaluating supplier performance by measuring the total cost to produce, deliver and support products and services beyond the supplier invoice price. As such, it considers the following supplier attributes: quality, delivery, price, flexibility, innovation and technology. For more information on Celestica's TCOO™ Supplier Awards, please visit www.celestica.com.About Celestica
Celestica is dedicated to delivering end-to-end product lifecycle solutions to drive our customers' success. Through our simplified global operations network and information technology platform, we are solid partners who deliver informed, flexible solutions that enable our customers to succeed in the markets they serve. Committed to providing a truly differentiated customer experience, our agile and adaptive employees share a proud history of demonstrated expertise and creativity that provides our customers with the ability to overcome complex challenges.For further information on Celestica, visit its website at http://www.celestica.com.
The company's securities filings can also be accessed at http://www.sedar.com and http://www.sec.gov.Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are predictive in nature and may be based on current expectations, forecasts or assumptions involving risks and uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes to differ materially from the forward-looking statements themselves. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbour for forward-looking statements contained in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and in applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future actions, events or outcomes. You should understand that the risks, uncertainties and factors which are identified in our various public filings at www.sedar.com and www.sec.gov could affect our future actions, events and outcomes and could cause them to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are provided for the purpose of providing information about management's current expectations and plans relating to the future. Readers are cautioned that such information may not be appropriate for other purposes. Except as may be required under applicable securities laws, we disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
For more information, please contact:
Global Communications
Celestica
416-448-2200
Email contact




Read more...
Celestica Named One of Canada's Best 50 Corporate Citizens
TORONTO, ON--(Marketwired - June 07, 2016) - Celestica Inc. (NYSE: CLS) (TSX: CLS), a global leader in the delivery of end-to-end product lifecycle solutions, today announced that it was named as one of Canada's Best 50 Corporate Citizens for 2016 by Corporate Knights, an organization dedicated to encouraging responsible business practices.The Corporate Knights' 15th annual Best 50 Corporate Citizens list ranks Canada's top corporate citizens based on environmental, social and governance indicators. To compile the ranking, Corporate Knights assesses companies on various metrics including greenhouse gas, water and waste productivity; health and safety performance; and leadership diversity. "We are honoured to once again be recognized by Corporate Knights as one of Canada's Best 50 Corporate Citizens," said Todd Melendy, Vice President, Sustainability and Compliance, Celestica. "We continue to aspire to be a leader in this area, and it's through the commitment of our 26,000 employees around the globe that we're successfully advancing our sustainability strategy and driving positive change." Celestica ranked 19 out of 50 companies included on the list. For more information about Celestica's sustainability strategy and performance, please visit the company's 2015 sustainability report at www.celestica.com. To view the Best 50 Corporate Citizens in Canada list, please visit www.corporateknights.com. About Celestica Celestica is dedicated to delivering end-to-end product lifecycle solutions to drive our customers' success. Through our simplified global operations network and information technology platform, we are solid partners who deliver informed, flexible solutions that enable our customers to succeed in the markets they serve. Committed to providing a truly differentiated customer experience, our agile and adaptive employees share a proud history of demonstrated expertise and creativity that provides our customers with the ability to overcome complex challenges.
Contacts:

Celestica Global Communications
(416) 448-2200
[email protected]

Celestica Investor Relations
(416) 448-2211
[email protected]



Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 15.29
CLS's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 1701 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 21.54 vs. CLS: 15.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
CLS' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.91  Med: 18.58 Max: 56.16
Current: 15.29
7.91
56.16
Forward PE Ratio 10.47
CLS's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
91% of the 157 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 18.35 vs. CLS: 10.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 15.29
CLS's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
66% of the 1653 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 21.62 vs. CLS: 15.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
CLS' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.91  Med: 18.58 Max: 56.16
Current: 15.29
7.91
56.16
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 20.21
CLS's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
51% of the 1111 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 19.38 vs. CLS: 20.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
CLS' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.98  Med: 15.07 Max: 2290
Current: 20.21
3.98
2290
PB Ratio 1.57
CLS's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
53% of the 2313 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.70 vs. CLS: 1.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
CLS' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 1.25 Max: 1.87
Current: 1.57
0.48
1.87
PS Ratio 0.33
CLS's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 2307 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. CLS: 0.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
CLS' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.28 Max: 0.46
Current: 0.33
0.1
0.46
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 13.11
CLS's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
62% of the 956 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 17.45 vs. CLS: 13.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
CLS' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.27  Med: 12.49 Max: 62.27
Current: 13.11
3.27
62.27
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 8.89
CLS's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
65% of the 1190 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 12.15 vs. CLS: 8.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
CLS' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.83  Med: 9.07 Max: 61.58
Current: 8.89
2.83
61.58
EV-to-EBIT 9.71
CLS's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
72% of the 1779 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 15.94 vs. CLS: 9.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CLS' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -143.5  Med: 9.6 Max: 210.9
Current: 9.71
-143.5
210.9
EV-to-EBITDA 6.73
CLS's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
77% of the 1896 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 12.17 vs. CLS: 6.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CLS' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.1  Med: 6.6 Max: 32.8
Current: 6.73
-2.1
32.8
PEG Ratio 1.12
CLS's PEG Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 833 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.92 vs. CLS: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
CLS' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.92  Med: 3.79 Max: 11.99
Current: 1.12
0.92
11.99
Shiller PE Ratio 124.10
CLS's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
90% of the 422 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 30.89 vs. CLS: 124.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
CLS' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 120.8  Med: 147.09 Max: 333.8
Current: 124.1
120.8
333.8
Current Ratio 1.95
CLS's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 2208 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.97 vs. CLS: 1.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CLS' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.57  Med: 1.91 Max: 3.08
Current: 1.95
1.57
3.08
Quick Ratio 1.16
CLS's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 2208 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. CLS: 1.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CLS' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.24 Max: 1.95
Current: 1.16
0.76
1.95
Days Inventory 58.19
CLS's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
61% of the 2193 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 71.23 vs. CLS: 58.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CLS' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 36.53  Med: 50.41 Max: 58.19
Current: 58.19
36.53
58.19
Days Sales Outstanding 43.83
CLS's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
82% of the 1866 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 74.36 vs. CLS: 43.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CLS' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 39.29  Med: 44.52 Max: 52.86
Current: 43.83
39.29
52.86
Days Payable 58.06
CLS's Days Payable is ranked higher than
50% of the 1798 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 58.06 vs. CLS: 58.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CLS' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 49.15  Med: 55.06 Max: 70.59
Current: 58.06
49.15
70.59

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 8.00
CLS's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
98% of the 1355 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: -2.80 vs. CLS: 8.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CLS' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -45.5  Med: 0.3 Max: 8
Current: 8
-45.5
8

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 2.45
CLS's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked higher than
69% of the 1778 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 4.16 vs. CLS: 2.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
CLS' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1  Med: 2.43 Max: 11.92
Current: 2.45
1
11.92
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.63
CLS's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
55% of the 2272 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.87 vs. CLS: 1.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
CLS' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 1.49 Max: 248.83
Current: 1.63
0.6
248.83
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.68
CLS's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
81% of the 1437 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.31 vs. CLS: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
CLS' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 0.75 Max: 2.64
Current: 0.68
0.27
2.64
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.19
CLS's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
53% of the 2237 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. CLS: 1.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
CLS' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 1.17 Max: 6.67
Current: 1.19
0.44
6.67
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 0.95
CLS's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked higher than
68% of the 558 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. CLS: 0.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
CLS' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 2.44 Max: 7.61
Current: 0.95
0.64
7.61
Price-to-Graham-Number 1.05
CLS's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
65% of the 1597 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.35 vs. CLS: 1.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
CLS' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 1.18 Max: 39.81
Current: 1.05
0.6
39.81
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 10.30
CLS's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
80% of the 2415 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.91 vs. CLS: 10.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
CLS' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 9.6 Max: 27
Current: 10.3
0.5
27
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 21.18
CLS's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
78% of the 1227 Companies
in the Global Contract Manufacturers industry.

( Industry Median: 8.05 vs. CLS: 21.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
CLS' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.4  Med: 7.05 Max: 24.7
Current: 21.18
-9.4
24.7

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $6,133
EPS (TTM) $ 0.93
Beta0.95
Short Percentage of Float0.54%
52-Week Range $8.83 - 14.74
Shares Outstanding (Mil)143.20

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 6,227 6,410 6,320
EPS ($) 1.30 1.39 1.48
EPS without NRI ($) 1.30 1.39 1.48
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for CLS

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
5 Undervalued Canadian Stocks for Intelligent Investors Feb 23 2017 
Scott Black’s Top 4 New Holdings of 3rd Quarter Nov 22 2016 
Celestica Recognizes Suppliers With Its 2015 Total Cost of Ownership Supplier Awards Jun 17 2016 
Celestica Named One of Canada's Best 50 Corporate Citizens Jun 07 2016 
Celestica Completes a Program Share Repurchase May 10 2016 
Celestica Releases Its 2015 Sustainability Report Apr 21 2016 
Celestica Announces Election of Directors Apr 21 2016 
Celestica Inc.: Q1 / 2016 Financial Results and Conference Call Apr 19 2016 
TE Connectivity Is Going to Double Revenue Growth Sep 23 2014 

More From Other Websites
Celestica Announces Executive Leadership Change May 23 2017
Cisco’s Top 10 Suppliers: The Impact of May’s Earnings May 17 2017
Celestica, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : CLS-US : May 15, 2017 May 15 2017
View From the Top: How to Be Successful May 03 2017
ETFs with exposure to Celestica, Inc. : April 26, 2017 Apr 26 2017
Celestica, Inc. :CLS-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : April 25, 2017 Apr 25 2017
Celestica Announces Election of Directors Apr 20 2017
Celestica posts 1Q profit Apr 20 2017
Celestica Announces First Quarter 2017 Financial Results Apr 20 2017
Does Celestica Offer a Good Value Buying Opportunity Now? Apr 06 2017
Celestica Unveils New Silicon Valley Customer Experience Center Mar 29 2017
Who Needs Goose? Take a Gander at Celestica's Upside Breakout Mar 16 2017
Celestica Files Form 20-F Mar 13 2017
ETFs with exposure to Celestica, Inc. : February 2, 2017 Feb 02 2017
Celestica, Inc. :CLS-US: Earnings Analysis: 2016 By the Numbers : January 31, 2017 Jan 31 2017
Celestica, Inc.: Strong price momentum but will it sustain? Jan 30 2017
Why Shares of Celestica Surged Today Jan 27 2017
CANADA STOCKS-TSX lower as resource stocks weigh; Celestica shines Jan 27 2017
Celestica tops Street 4Q forecasts Jan 26 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)