Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.41
CUB's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
74% of the 202 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. CUB: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
CUB' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 1.03 Max: 26.17
Current: 0.41
0.09
26.17
Equity-to-Asset 0.55
CUB's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
63% of the 202 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.44 vs. CUB: 0.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
CUB' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.58 Max: 0.67
Current: 0.55
0.45
0.67
Debt-to-Equity 0.33
CUB's Debt-to-Equity is ranked higher than
61% of the 164 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. CUB: 0.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
CUB' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.25 Max: 0.67
Current: 0.33
0.02
0.67
Debt-to-EBITDA 2.58
CUB's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
65% of the 152 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.54 vs. CUB: 2.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
CUB' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.64 Max: 8.96
Current: 2.58
0.07
8.96
Interest Coverage 3.82
CUB's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
92% of the 159 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 12.39 vs. CUB: 3.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CUB' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.81  Med: 29.1 Max: 85.02
Current: 3.82
0.81
85.02
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 4.79
Beneish M-Score: -2.69
WACC vs ROIC
8.02%
1.79%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 2.55
CUB's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
70% of the 203 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 5.39 vs. CUB: 2.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
CUB' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.62  Med: 7.04 Max: 9.7
Current: 2.55
0.62
9.7
Net Margin % 0.47
CUB's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
73% of the 203 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 3.92 vs. CUB: 0.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
CUB' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.75  Med: 4.58 Max: 6.94
Current: 0.47
-0.75
6.94
ROE % 1.13
CUB's ROE % is ranked lower than
79% of the 188 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 7.18 vs. CUB: 1.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
CUB' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.63  Med: 9.41 Max: 15.74
Current: 1.13
-1.63
15.74
ROA % 0.59
CUB's ROA % is ranked lower than
75% of the 204 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.78 vs. CUB: 0.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
CUB' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.79  Med: 6 Max: 9.84
Current: 0.59
-0.79
9.84
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 12.56
CUB's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
63% of the 202 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 10.11 vs. CUB: 12.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
CUB' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.12  Med: 26.25 Max: 212.33
Current: 12.56
1.12
212.33
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 1.70
CUB's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
57% of the 181 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 4.30 vs. CUB: 1.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
CUB' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.6  Med: 6.1 Max: 23.3
Current: 1.7
-10.6
23.3
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -17.60
CUB's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
82% of the 154 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 5.60 vs. CUB: -17.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
CUB' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -45.9  Med: 7.6 Max: 92.4
Current: -17.6
-45.9
92.4
GuruFocus has detected 9 Warning Signs with Cubic Corp CUB.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» CUB's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-11-21 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2017

CUB Guru Trades in Q3 2017

First Pacific Advisors 470,620 sh (+5.08%)
FPA Capital Fund 226,289 sh (+4.99%)
Richard Pzena 946,046 sh (+3.49%)
Third Avenue Management 132,204 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 134,798 sh (-0.32%)
Murray Stahl 13,369 sh (-4.98%)
Jim Simons 175,400 sh (-7.10%)
Mario Gabelli 13,700 sh (-9.87%)
» More
Q4 2017

CUB Guru Trades in Q4 2017

Mario Gabelli 13,700 sh (unchged)
Third Avenue Management 132,204 sh (unchged)
Murray Stahl 13,319 sh (-0.37%)
Jim Simons 159,900 sh (-8.84%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 114,776 sh (-14.85%)
Richard Pzena 760,371 sh (-19.63%)
First Pacific Advisors 211,337 sh (-55.09%)
FPA Capital Fund 88,378 sh (-60.94%)
» More
Q1 2018

CUB Guru Trades in Q1 2018

Mariko Gordon 788,053 sh (New)
Mario Gabelli 13,700 sh (unchged)
Third Avenue Management 132,204 sh (unchged)
Murray Stahl 12,852 sh (-3.51%)
Richard Pzena 713,870 sh (-6.12%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 86,161 sh (-24.93%)
First Pacific Advisors 109,033 sh (-48.41%)
FPA Capital Fund 42,490 sh (-51.92%)
Jim Simons 48,800 sh (-69.48%)
» More
Q2 2018

CUB Guru Trades in Q2 2018

Mariko Gordon 791,084 sh (+0.38%)
Third Avenue Management 132,450 sh (+0.19%)
Mario Gabelli 13,700 sh (unchged)
First Pacific Advisors Sold Out
FPA Capital Fund Sold Out
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 85,982 sh (-0.21%)
Murray Stahl 12,477 sh (-2.92%)
Richard Pzena 361,173 sh (-49.41%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CUB

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Mariko Gordon 2018-06-30 Add 0.38%0.01%$59.8 - $71.85 $ 73.3510%791,084
Richard Pzena 2018-06-30 Reduce -49.41%0.11%$59.8 - $71.85 $ 73.3510%361,173
Third Avenue Management 2018-06-30 Add 0.19%$59.8 - $71.85 $ 73.3510%132,450
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2018-06-30 Reduce -0.21%$59.8 - $71.85 $ 73.3510%85,982
FPA Capital Fund 2018-06-30 Sold Out 1.02%$59.8 - $71.85 $ 73.3510%0
Mariko Gordon 2018-03-31 New Buy3.12%$54.05 - $65.65 $ 73.3520%788,053
Richard Pzena 2018-03-31 Reduce -6.12%0.01%$54.05 - $65.65 $ 73.3520%713,870
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2018-03-31 Reduce -24.93%$54.05 - $65.65 $ 73.3520%86,161
FPA Capital Fund 2018-03-31 Reduce -51.92%0.96%$54.05 - $65.65 $ 73.3520%42,490
Richard Pzena 2017-12-31 Reduce -19.63%0.05%$51.9 - $63 $ 73.3530%760,371
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2017-12-31 Reduce -14.85%$51.9 - $63 $ 73.3530%114,776
FPA Capital Fund 2017-12-31 Reduce -60.94%2.3%$51.9 - $63 $ 73.3530%88,378
Richard Pzena 2017-09-30 Add 3.49%0.01%$40.2 - $51.95 $ 73.3562%946,046
FPA Capital Fund 2017-09-30 Add 4.99%0.18%$40.2 - $51.95 $ 73.3562%226,289
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2017-09-30 Reduce -0.32%$40.2 - $51.95 $ 73.3562%134,798
Mario Gabelli 2017-09-30 Reduce -9.87%$40.2 - $51.95 $ 73.3562%13,700
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Aerospace & Defense » Aerospace & Defense    NAICS: 334511    SIC: 3812
Compare:NYSE:KAMN, SZSE:300053, LSE:SNR, SZSE:002025, LSE:QQ., SHSE:600990, NYSE:AIR, XPAR:FII, SZSE:002023, LSE:ULE, SHSE:600316, NAS:AVAV, NYSE:AJRD, NYSE:ESL, NAS:AAXN, NYSE:TGI, WBO:FACC, TPE:2634, BOM:540678, TSE:7224 » details
Traded in other countries:UBQ.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Cubic Corp caters to the defense industry. It designs and develops of technology systems and products, which are made to suit defense requirements.

Cubic Corp is an international provider of systems and solutions for the mass transit and global defense markets. It uses three segments for financial reporting: transportation systems, global defense services, and global defense systems. The company integrates payment and information solutions for travel applications. It allows people to choose a cost- and time-effective way to travel, and helps transportation authorities manage demand across entire networks. The global defense segments provide training and operational support for multiple branches of the U.S. military. Approximately half of total revenue is derived from the United States, with the United Kingdom and Australia also producing material sales.

Guru Investment Theses on Cubic Corp

Third Avenue Management Comments on Cubic Corp - Dec 19, 2016

Cubic Corp (NYSE:CUB), another top holding for the Fund, is a small company with about $1.1 billion in market cap that has three main businesses: military communication equipment, military training (for example, they run the Top Gun flight school), and in our view the most interesting part is its transportation segment. The company's transportation segment is the world leader in design and management of public bus and subway systems, handling the fare systems for major cities such as London, New York City, Chicago, and Vancouver. Cubic is also leading technology efforts, such as smart phone payments and dynamic re-routing, to help keep us all on time for work.

The company meets all of our requirements, with low (and declining) financial leverage, highly visible means to compound earnings and book value growth. And, at $43 per share, we think the stock is very under-valued, with upside to north of $60 within a couple of years.

From Third Avenue Management (Trades, Portfolio)'s third quarter 2016 commentary.

Check out Third Avenue Management,Martin Whitman latest stock trades

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 252.94
CUB's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 139 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 24.70 vs. CUB: 252.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
CUB' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.41  Med: 17.99 Max: 703.57
Current: 252.94
11.41
703.57
Forward PE Ratio 34.48
CUB's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
90% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 19.80 vs. CUB: 34.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 166.68
CUB's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 139 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 24.70 vs. CUB: 166.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
CUB' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.41  Med: 18.15 Max: 703.57
Current: 166.68
11.41
703.57
PB Ratio 2.96
CUB's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 187 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.22 vs. CUB: 2.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
CUB' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.15  Med: 1.94 Max: 3.34
Current: 2.96
1.15
3.34
PS Ratio 1.21
CUB's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 193 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.43 vs. CUB: 1.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
CUB' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 0.93 Max: 1.44
Current: 1.21
0.6
1.44
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 82.42
CUB's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 13.84 vs. CUB: 82.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
CUB' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.26  Med: 11.75 Max: 104.86
Current: 82.42
4.26
104.86
EV-to-EBIT 56.56
CUB's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
95% of the 155 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 19.18 vs. CUB: 56.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CUB' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -183.3  Med: 10.9 Max: 420.9
Current: 56.56
-183.3
420.9
EV-to-EBITDA 24.27
CUB's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
77% of the 167 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 13.86 vs. CUB: 24.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CUB' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.9  Med: 9.3 Max: 36
Current: 24.27
4.9
36
EV-to-Revenue 1.29
CUB's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
63% of the 200 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.70 vs. CUB: 1.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
CUB' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 0.8 Max: 1.4
Current: 1.29
0.5
1.4
Shiller PE Ratio 41.80
CUB's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
54% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 33.61 vs. CUB: 41.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
CUB' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.56  Med: 25.42 Max: 53.11
Current: 41.8
15.56
53.11
Current Ratio 2.22
CUB's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
53% of the 198 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.62 vs. CUB: 2.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CUB' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.47  Med: 2.48 Max: 3.32
Current: 2.22
1.47
3.32
Quick Ratio 1.76
CUB's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 197 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. CUB: 1.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CUB' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.25  Med: 2.26 Max: 2.92
Current: 1.76
1.25
2.92
Days Inventory 30.85
CUB's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
88% of the 188 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 128.86 vs. CUB: 30.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CUB' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.85  Med: 18.13 Max: 30.85
Current: 30.85
13.85
30.85
Days Sales Outstanding 23.89
CUB's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
70% of the 169 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 66.94 vs. CUB: 23.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CUB' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23.89  Med: 91.24 Max: 111.38
Current: 23.89
23.89
111.38
Days Payable 32.71
CUB's Days Payable is ranked lower than
77% of the 156 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 59.17 vs. CUB: 32.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CUB' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.57  Med: 15.47 Max: 32.71
Current: 32.71
10.57
32.71

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 0.37
CUB's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
86% of the 254 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. CUB: 0.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
CUB' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.5 Max: 0.88
Current: 0.37
0.31
0.88
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.71
CUB's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 128 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.28 vs. CUB: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
CUB' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.06  Med: 0.09 Max: 4.5
Current: 0.71
0.06
4.5
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 4.00
CUB's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
51% of the 88 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 4.10 vs. CUB: 4.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
CUB' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 3.3 Max: 10.6
Current: 4
0
10.6
Forward Dividend Yield % 0.37
CUB's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
90% of the 240 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.49 vs. CUB: 0.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.43
CUB's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
85% of the 327 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.07 vs. CUB: 0.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
CUB' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 0.58 Max: 1.03
Current: 0.43
0.36
1.03
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.40
CUB's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
63% of the 131 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: -3.10 vs. CUB: -0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CUB' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.4  Med: 0 Max: 5.3
Current: -0.4
-0.4
5.3

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 36.00
CUB's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 6.12 vs. CUB: 36.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
CUB' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.99  Med: 2.75 Max: 36.59
Current: 36
0.99
36.59
Price-to-Tangible-Book 7.27
CUB's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
88% of the 164 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.99 vs. CUB: 7.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
CUB' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.62  Med: 2.06 Max: 9.4
Current: 7.27
0.62
9.4
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 2.95
CUB's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
70% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.84 vs. CUB: 2.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
CUB' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46  Med: 1.18 Max: 4.92
Current: 2.95
0.46
4.92
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.31
CUB's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
57% of the 162 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. CUB: 1.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
CUB' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 0.77 Max: 1.36
Current: 1.31
0.3
1.36
Price-to-Graham-Number 7.35
CUB's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.36 vs. CUB: 7.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
CUB' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 1.34 Max: 15.35
Current: 7.35
0.38
15.35
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 1.80
CUB's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
72% of the 204 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 3.57 vs. CUB: 1.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
CUB' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.6  Med: 8.8 Max: 18
Current: 1.8
-0.6
18
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -4.27
CUB's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
81% of the 120 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 5.58 vs. CUB: -4.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
CUB' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.7  Med: 7.9 Max: 31
Current: -4.27
-15.7
31

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,642.75
EPS (TTM) $ 0.29
Beta1.28
Volatility30.88%
52-Week Range $41.25 - 77.35
Shares Outstanding (Mil)27.25

Analyst Estimate

Sep18 Sep19
Revenue (Mil $) 1,175 1,317
EBIT (Mil $) 31 90
EBITDA (Mil $) 70 138
EPS ($) 0.12 2.15
EPS without NRI ($) 0.12 2.15
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
95.50%
Dividends per Share ($)

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 66
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAY
Lower Leverage yoyN
Higher Current Ratio yoyY
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyN
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}