Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 2/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Equity-to-Asset 0.12
DNR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
83% of the 425 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. DNR: 0.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
DNR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.16  Med: 0.46 Max: 0.88
Current: 0.12
-0.16
0.88
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: -1.20
Beneish M-Score: -2.61
WACC vs ROIC
6.54%
-7.57%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -41.30
DNR's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
59% of the 436 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -23.06 vs. DNR: -41.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
DNR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -54.74  Med: 36.49 Max: 46.74
Current: -41.3
-54.74
46.74
Net Margin % -72.85
DNR's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
65% of the 434 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -29.08 vs. DNR: -72.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
DNR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -348.73  Med: 18.83 Max: 28.44
Current: -72.85
-348.73
28.44
ROE % -102.43
DNR's ROE % is ranked lower than
91% of the 425 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.78 vs. DNR: -102.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
DNR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -126.15  Med: 9.57 Max: 23.94
Current: -102.43
-126.15
23.94
ROA % -16.08
DNR's ROA % is ranked lower than
67% of the 511 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.02 vs. DNR: -16.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
DNR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -47.12  Med: 4.51 Max: 12.21
Current: -16.08
-47.12
12.21
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -24.63
DNR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
67% of the 483 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.12 vs. DNR: -24.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
DNR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -77.51  Med: 11.88 Max: 24.35
Current: -24.63
-77.51
24.35
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -27.30
DNR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
59% of the 374 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -21.40 vs. DNR: -27.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
DNR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -27.3  Med: 9.8 Max: 37
Current: -27.3
-27.3
37
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with Denbury Resources Inc $DNR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» DNR's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-08-04 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P    NAICS: 211111    SIC: 1311
Compare:AMEX:REI, NYSE:ESTE, NYSE:HK, NYSE:SD, NYSE:BCEI, NYSE:SN, OTCPK:CNNEF, OTCPK:IACAF, NAS:EXXI, OTCPK:VREYF, OTCPK:PDPYF, NYSE:BTE, NYSE:REN, OTCPK:AOIFF, NYSE:PWE, OTCPK:BNPUF, NYSE:ECR, NAS:DMLP, NYSE:GPRK, OTCPK:OPGYF » details
Traded in other countries:HGJ.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Denbury Resources Inc is a part of the energy sector. Its business is to explore and produce oil & gas resources in the United States.

Denbury Resources focuses on injecting carbon dioxide to enhance production from mature, conventional fields. At the end of 2016, the company reported net proven reserves of 254 million barrels of oil equivalent. Net production averaged 64 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2016 at a ratio of 96% oil and natural gas liquids and 4% natural gas.

Top Ranked Articles about Denbury Resources Inc

Denbury Resources to Present at J.P. Morgan Energy Equity Conference
Denbury Resources to Present at Energy Conferences
Denbury Announces Release Date for First Quarter 2017 Results and Conference Call
Denbury Announces Management Transition Plan

PLANO, Texas, March 21, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Denbury Resources Inc. (:DNR) (“Denbury” or the “Company”) today announced that Phil Rykhoek, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer for the past eight years, will retire from that role on June 30, 2017, and, as part of the Company’s leadership succession plan, the Company’s Board of Directors intends to elect Christian S. Kendall as Chief Executive Officer as of that date.
“Phil’s executive leadership over more than two decades has been invaluable and has greatly contributed to Denbury’s success over that time,” said John Dielwart, Denbury’s Chairman of the Board. “The Board and I are grateful for Phil’s many years of service, beginning as one of our first employees and CFO in 1995, and as our CEO since 2009.  Over that period, Denbury has become one of the world’s leading enhanced oil recovery producers, and we deeply appreciate Phil’s many accomplishments that have led to that success.” “As Chief Operating Officer and now recently President, Chris has played a crucial role in optimizing Denbury’s operations with his practiced leadership skills and his broad industry expertise and knowledge.  We believe that Chris’ talents will help to ensure Denbury’s continuing success.” Mr. Rykhoek commented, “We anticipated that Chris could ultimately succeed me as CEO when he joined the Company in 2015.  Chris has proven himself to be a great leader and we believe the time is right for this change.  He has been an integral part of our management team since he joined Denbury, and I am confident that he will successfully take Denbury to the next level.  We will continue to work closely together throughout this transition.” Mr. Rykhoek, 60, will leave his board position when he retires from his CEO role, and the Board currently intends for Mr. Kendall to replace Mr. Rykhoek as a director of the Company.  Mr. Rykhoek will continue in a part-time advisory role until January 2018 as part of the leadership transition. Mr. Kendall, 50, joined Denbury as Chief Operating Officer in September 2015 and was named President in October 2016.  Mr. Kendall has over 27 years of experience in the oil and gas industry, holding a variety of technical and leadership roles, both international and domestic.  Prior to joining Denbury, he spent 14 years with Noble Energy, most recently as Senior Vice President, Global Operations Services.  His prior assignments at Noble Energy include serving as Vice President, Gulf of Mexico, and as Business Unit Manager and Vice President, Noble Energy Mediterranean, Ltd.  Mr. Kendall began his career with Mobil Oil Corporation in 1989.  He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering, Civil Specialty, from the Colorado School of Mines. Denbury is an independent oil and natural gas company with operations focused in two key operating areas: the Gulf Coast and Rocky Mountain regions.  The Company’s goal is to increase the value of its properties through a combination of exploitation, drilling and proven engineering extraction practices, with the most significant emphasis relating to CO2 enhanced oil recovery operations.
DENBURY CONTACTS:
Mark C. Allen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 972.673.2000
John Mayer, Investor Relations, 972.673.2383

Read more...
Denbury Announces 2017 Capital Budget and Estimated Production; Reports Year-End 2016 Proved Reserves and Preliminary 2016 Production and Capital Expenditures

PLANO, Texas, Feb. 14, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Denbury Resources Inc. (NYSE:NYSE:DNR) (“Denbury” or the “Company”) today announced that its 2017 capital budget, excluding acquisitions and capitalized interest, is currently estimated at approximately $300 million, 44% over 2016 capital spending levels.  The budget provides for:
$175 million allocated for tertiary oil field expenditures;$60 million allocated for other areas, primarily non-tertiary oil field expenditures;$10 million to be spent on CO2 sources and pipelines; and$55 million for other capital items such as capitalized internal acquisition, exploration and development costs and pre-production tertiary startup costs. In addition, capitalized interest for 2017 is currently estimated at approximately $20 million.  At this spending level, the Company anticipates 2017 production of between 58,000 and 62,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (“BOE/d”), with the mid-point of such range roughly flat with the Company’s 2016 exit rate of just under 60,000 BOE/d. MANAGEMENT COMMENT Phil Rykhoek, Denbury’s CEO commented, “We are pleased with our progress over the past year, especially the improvements we made in reducing costs and enhancing the efficiency of our operations.  We also completed a robust review of all of our fields and identified multiple areas that we can exploit in the coming years, including both tertiary expansions and other opportunities.  We continue to be vigilant with our balance sheet and are limiting our capital spending to an amount near our expected cash flow.  Our capital spending in the current price environment continues to be primarily focused on expanding our existing CO2 floods and other infill opportunities and, importantly, our planned 2017 capital projects have strong economics at $50 oil.  With our improved efficiencies, this $300 million capital budget should hold full-year 2017 production essentially flat with our 2016 exit rate and should put us on a trajectory to resume slight production growth in 2018, based on current assumptions and expectations.  We are encouraged by our future opportunities and are looking forward to 2017 as we continue to pursue ways to enhance our operating efficiency and de-lever our balance sheet.” PRELIMINARY 2016 FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL PRODUCTION
Denbury’s continuing production averaged 60,685 BOE/d during the fourth quarter of 2016, in line with our expectations, and was 96% oil, with CO2 tertiary properties accounting for 62% of overall production.  On a sequential-quarter basis, continuing production in the fourth quarter of 2016 was essentially flat with continuing production in the third quarter of 2016, with production from our CO2 tertiary properties increasing slightly. Excluding sold properties, Denbury’s continuing production for full-year 2016 averaged 62,998 BOE/d, down 11% from the prior-year’s level.  Approximately one-third of the production decline was attributable to production shut-in due to economics and weather-related shut-in production at Thompson and Conroe fields, with the remainder largely due to natural production declines.  Further production information is provided on page 7 of this press release. PRELIMINARY 2016 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES Denbury’s 2016 development capital expenditures totaled $209 million, consisting of $206 million spent on oil and natural gas development, including $56 million related to capitalized internal acquisition, exploration and development costs and pre-production tertiary startup costs, with the remainder spent primarily on CO2 source wells and CO2 infrastructure and pipelines.  These estimated capital expenditures exclude property acquisition costs of $11 million and capitalized interest of $26 million. A breakdown of preliminary estimated 2016 capital expenditures is shown in the following table: In millions 2016 Preliminary
Capital
Expenditures (1)Capital expenditures by project  Tertiary oil fields $119 Non-tertiary fields 31 Capitalized internal costs (2) 56 Oil and natural gas capital expenditures 206 CO2 pipelines, sources and other 3 Capital expenditures, before acquisitions and capitalized interest 209 Acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties 11 Capital expenditures, before capitalized interest 220 Capitalized interest 26 Capital expenditures, total $246 
(1) Capital expenditure amounts include accrued capital.
(2) Includes capitalized internal acquisition, exploration and development costs and pre-production tertiary startup costs.

2016 PROVED RESERVES The Company’s total estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves at December 31, 2016 were 254 million barrels of oil equivalent (“MMBOE”), consisting of 247 million barrels of crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (together, “liquids”), and 44 billion cubic feet (or 7 MMBOE) of natural gas.  Reserves were 97% liquids and 82% proved developed, with 58% of those reserves attributable to Denbury’s CO2 tertiary operations.  Total proved reserves declined by a net 35 MMBOE during 2016 primarily due to 23 MMBOE of production, with 7 MMBOE of downward revisions of previous estimates associated with changes in commodity prices, operating costs and performance, and 5 MMBOE due to properties sold during the year.   Oil
(MMBbl) Gas
(Bcf) MMBOEBalance at December 31, 2015 282  38  289 Revisions of previous estimates (9) 16  (7)2016 production (22) (6) (23)Sales of minerals or other revisions (4) (4) (5)Balance at December 31, 2016 247  44  254 
Year-end 2016 estimated proved reserves and the discounted net present value of Denbury’s proved reserves, using a 10% per annum discount rate (“PV-10 Value”)(1) (a non-GAAP measure), were computed using first-day-of-the-month 12-month average prices of $42.75 per Bbl for oil (based on NYMEX prices) and $2.55 per million British thermal unit (“MMBtu”) for natural gas (based on Henry Hub cash prices), adjusted for prices received at the field.  Comparative prices for year-end 2015 were $50.28 per Bbl of oil and $2.63 per MMBtu for natural gas, adjusted for prices received at the field.  The preliminary standardized measure of discounted estimated future net cash flows after income taxes of Denbury’s proved reserves at December 31, 2016 (“Standardized Measure”) was $1.4 billion compared to $1.9 billion at December 31, 2015.  PV-10 Value(1) was $1.5 billion at December 31, 2016, compared to $2.3 billion at December 31, 2015.  See the accompanying schedules for an explanation of the difference between PV-10 Value(1) and the preliminary Standardized Measure and the uses of this information. Denbury’s estimated proved CO2 reserves at year-end 2016, on a gross or 8/8th’s basis for operated fields, together with its overriding royalty interest in LaBarge Field in Wyoming, totaled 6.5 trillion cubic feet (“Tcf”), slightly lower than CO2 reserves of 6.7 Tcf as of December 31, 2015.  Of these total CO2 reserves, 5.3 Tcf are located in the Gulf Coast region and 1.2 Tcf in the Rocky Mountain region.  In addition to these proved CO2 reserves, in the Gulf Coast region Denbury is currently purchasing CO2 from two industrial facilities and expects purchases to begin in the near future from Mississippi Power’s Kemper County plant; and in the Rocky Mountain region Denbury has the ability to purchase CO2 from a gas processing facility, all under long-term contractual agreements.  Although there are no proved CO2 reserves associated with these long-term agreements, they currently supply approximately 65 million cubic feet per day (“MMcf/d”) of the CO2 Denbury is using for its tertiary operations and could increase up to approximately 225 MMcf/d in a few years once the Kemper County plant is fully operational. (1)    A non-GAAP measure.  See accompanying schedules that reconcile GAAP to non-GAAP measures along with a statement indicating why the Company believes the non-GAAP measures provide useful information for investors. CONFERENCE PRESENTATION Phil Rykhoek, CEO, Chris Kendall, President and COO, and Mark Allen, Sr. VP and CFO, will be attending the 22nd Annual Credit Suisse Energy Summit and delivering a Company presentation on Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 10:20 A.M. Mountain Time.  A link to the live webcast of the presentation and the presentation slides will be available the morning of Tuesday, February 14th in the investor relations section of the Company’s website at www.denbury.com. FOURTH QUARTER AND FULL-YEAR 2016 RESULTS CONFERENCE CALL Denbury management will host a conference call to review and discuss fourth quarter and full-year 2016 financial and operating results, together with its financial and operating outlook for 2017, on Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 10:00 A.M. (Central).  Additionally, Denbury will publish presentation materials on its website which will be referenced during the conference call.  Individuals who would like to participate should dial 800.230.1074 or 612.332.0226 ten minutes before the scheduled start time.  To access a live audio webcast of the conference call and accompanying slide presentation, please visit the investor relations section of the Company’s website at www.denbury.com.  The webcast will be archived on the website, and a telephonic replay will be accessible for at least one month after the call by dialing 800.475.6701 or 320.365.3844 and entering confirmation number 361971. Denbury is an independent oil and natural gas company with operations focused in two key operating areas: the Gulf Coast and Rocky Mountain regions.  The Company’s goal is to increase the value of its properties through a combination of exploitation, drilling and proven engineering extraction practices, with the most significant emphasis relating to CO2 enhanced oil recovery operations.  For more information about Denbury, please visit www.denbury.com. In this press release, Denbury provides estimated year-end 2016 proved reserves information and preliminary production and capital expenditures information for its fiscal year 2016.  Denbury has prepared the summary preliminary data in this release based on the most current information available to management.  Denbury’s normal closing and financial reporting processes with respect to the preliminary data herein have not been fully completed and, as a result, its actual results could be different from this summary preliminary information presented herein, and any such differences could be material. This press release, other than historical financial information, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties including the preliminary information referenced above, estimated 2017 production and capital expenditures, estimated cash generated from operations in 2017, and other risks and uncertainties detailed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Denbury’s most recent report on Form 10-K.  These risks and uncertainties are incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein.  These statements are based on engineering, geological, financial and operating assumptions that management believes are reasonable based on currently available information; however, management’s assumptions and the Company’s future performance are both subject to a wide range of business risks, and there is no assurance that these goals and projections can or will be met.  Actual results may vary materially.  In addition, any forward-looking statements represent the Company’s estimates only as of today and should not be relied upon as representing its estimates as of any future date.  Denbury assumes no obligation to update its forward-looking statements. DENBURY RESOURCES INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE (UNAUDITED) Reconciliation of the preliminary standardized measure of discounted estimated future net cash flows after income taxes (GAAP measure) to PV-10 Value (non-GAAP measure) PV-10 Value is a non-GAAP measure and is different from the preliminary Standardized Measure in that PV-10 Value is a pre-tax number and the Standardized Measure is an after-tax number.  Denbury’s 2016 and 2015 year-end estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves and proved CO2 reserves quantities were prepared by the independent reservoir engineering firm of DeGolyer and MacNaughton.  The information used to calculate PV-10 Value is derived directly from data determined in accordance with FASC Topic 932.  Management believes PV-10 Value is a useful supplemental disclosure to the Standardized Measure because the Standardized Measure can be impacted by a company’s unique tax situation, and it is not practical to calculate the Standardized Measure on a property-by-property basis.  Because of this, PV-10 Value is a widely used measure within the industry and is commonly used by securities analysts, banks and credit rating agencies to evaluate the estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves on a comparative basis across companies or specific properties.  PV-10 Value is commonly used by management and others in the industry to evaluate properties that are bought and sold, to assess the potential return on investment in the Company’s oil and natural gas properties, and to perform impairment testing of oil and natural gas properties.  PV-10 Value is not a measure of financial or operating performance under GAAP, nor should it be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the Standardized Measure.  PV-10 Value and the preliminary Standardized Measure do not purport to represent the fair value of the Company’s oil and natural gas reserves.   December 31,In thousands 2016 2015Preliminary Standardized Measure (GAAP measure) $1,399,217  $1,890,124 Discounted estimated future income tax 142,467  428,431 PV-10 Value (non-GAAP measure) $1,541,684  $2,318,555 
DENBURY RESOURCES INC.
PRODUCTION HIGHLIGHTS (UNAUDITED)   Quarter Ended Year Ended  December 31, Sept. 30, December 31,Average Daily Volumes (BOE/d) (6:1) 2016 2015 2016 2016 2015Tertiary oil production          Gulf Coast region          Mature properties (1) 8,440  10,403  8,653  9,040  10,830 Delhi 4,387  3,898  4,262  4,155  3,688 Hastings 4,552  5,082  4,729  4,829  5,061 Heidelberg 4,924  5,635  5,000  5,128  5,785 Oyster Bayou 4,988  5,831  4,767  5,083  5,898 Tinsley 6,786  7,522  6,756  7,192  8,119 Total Gulf Coast region 34,077  38,371  34,167  35,427  39,381 Rocky Mountain region          Bell Creek 3,269  2,806  3,032  3,121  2,221 Total Rocky Mountain region 3,269  2,806  3,032  3,121  2,221 Total tertiary oil production 37,346  41,177  37,199  38,548  41,602 Non-tertiary oil and gas production          Gulf Coast region          Mississippi 745  1,377  963  850  1,194 Texas 5,143  6,470  4,234  4,906  6,443 Other 569  800  538  528  889 Total Gulf Coast region 6,457  8,647  5,735  6,284  8,526 Rocky Mountain region          Cedar Creek Anticline 15,186  17,875  16,017  16,322  17,997 Other 1,696  2,407  1,763  1,844  2,743 Total Rocky Mountain region 16,882  20,282  17,780  18,166  20,740 Total non-tertiary production 23,339  28,929  23,515  24,450  29,266 Total continuing production 60,685  70,106  60,714  62,998  70,868 Property sales          Williston Assets (2) —  1,473  819  864  1,549 Other property divestitures —  423  —  141  444 Total production 60,685  72,002  61,533  64,003  72,861 

(1) Mature properties include Brookhaven, Cranfield, Eucutta, Little Creek, Lockhart Crossing, Mallalieu, Martinville, McComb and Soso fields.
(2) Includes non-tertiary production in the Rocky Mountain region related to the sale of remaining non-core assets in the Williston Basin of North Dakota and Montana, which closed in the third quarter of 2016.
DENBURY CONTACTS:
Mark C. Allen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 972.673.2000
John Mayer, Investor Relations, 972.673.2383

Read more...
Denbury Announces Release Date for Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2016 Results and Conference Call
PLANO, Texas, Feb. 06, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Denbury Resources Inc. (NYSE:NYSE:DNR) (“Denbury” or the “Company”) will host a conference call to review and discuss fourth quarter and full-year 2016 financial and operating results, together with its financial and operating outlook for 2017, on Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 10:00 A.M. (Central).  The Company plans to issue its financial and operating results prior to the market opening on the same day.  Individuals who would like to participate should dial the applicable dial-in number listed below ten minutes before the scheduled start time.What: Denbury Resources Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2016 Results Conference CallDate: Thursday, February 23, 2017Time: 10:00 A.M. (Central) / 11:00 A.M. (Eastern)Dial-in numbers: 800.230.1074 (domestic) and 612.332.0226 (international)Conference ID number: 361971A live presentation webcast of the conference call will be available on the Company’s website at www.denbury.com.  The webcast will be archived on the website and a telephonic replay will be accessible for at least one month after the call by dialing 800.475.6701 (domestic) or 320.365.3844 (international) and entering the conference ID number: 361971.Denbury is an independent oil and natural gas company with operations focused in two key operating areas: the Gulf Coast and Rocky Mountain regions.  The Company's goal is to increase the value of its properties through a combination of exploitation, drilling and proven engineering extraction practices, with the most significant emphasis relating to carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery (CO2 EOR) operations.  For more information about Denbury, please visit www.denbury.com. 

DENBURY CONTACTS:
John Mayer, Investor Relations, 972.673.2383
Ben Nelson, Financial Analyst, 972.673.2787

Read more...
Jeremy Grantham Buys Penn Virginia Oil and gas company recently emerged from bankruptcy
Jeremy Grantham (Trades, Portfolio), chairman of the board at Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo, established a position in Penn Virginia Corp. (NASDAQ:PVAC) on Dec. 31, 2016. Read more...
Oil Prices Lower as OPEC Meeting Approaches OPEC meeting a factor for the energy sector
Oil prices were lower Friday ahead of next week’s OPEC meeting after reports that it would be unlikely for OPEC to reach an agreement at the organization’s informal meeting to be held at the International Energy Forum in Algeria. OPEC will begin meeting over the weekend and continue discussions throughout the week. Primarily in focus will be cooperation between Saudi Arabia and Iran. Saudi Arabia has reportedly suggested it would reduce its output if Iran would also agree to lower its production. Read more...
Oil Prices Gain Slightly Oil trading around $45 per barrel for the week
Oil prices remained mostly steady around $45 per barrel for the week as the energy industry continues to struggle with oversupply. Read more...
Oil Prices Gaining Oil prices reached new highs last week
Oil prices gained during the Aug. 19 week, helping stock momentum and market indexes reach new highs. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 21.83
DNR's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 119 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 19.34 vs. DNR: 21.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 1.23
DNR's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. DNR: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
DNR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 1.46 Max: 5.94
Current: 1.23
0.28
5.94
PS Ratio 0.54
DNR's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 401 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.87 vs. DNR: 0.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
DNR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 2.86 Max: 8.95
Current: 0.54
0.28
8.95
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 2.39
DNR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
83% of the 272 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.30 vs. DNR: 2.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
DNR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 5.24 Max: 15.17
Current: 2.39
0.41
15.17
Current Ratio 0.53
DNR's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
75% of the 497 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. DNR: 0.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
DNR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 1.09 Max: 2.66
Current: 0.53
0.4
2.66
Quick Ratio 0.53
DNR's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
74% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. DNR: 0.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
DNR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 1.09 Max: 2.66
Current: 0.53
0.4
2.66
Days Sales Outstanding 46.94
DNR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
56% of the 386 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 51.71 vs. DNR: 46.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
DNR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 34.05  Med: 50.03 Max: 77.4
Current: 46.94
34.05
77.4
Days Payable 54.79
DNR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
64% of the 255 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 86.03 vs. DNR: 54.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
DNR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 54.79  Med: 89.3 Max: 213.32
Current: 54.79
54.79
213.32

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.91
DNR's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
61% of the 419 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.85 vs. DNR: 1.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
DNR' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 3.1 Max: 18.71
Current: 1.91
0.37
18.71
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -3.20
DNR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
72% of the 376 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -10.50 vs. DNR: -3.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
DNR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -32.9  Med: -3.5 Max: 3.2
Current: -3.2
-32.9
3.2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.21
DNR's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
52% of the 402 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. DNR: 1.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
DNR' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 2.06 Max: 5.55
Current: 1.21
0.4
5.55
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.90
DNR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
57% of the 117 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.10 vs. DNR: 0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
DNR' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 3.12 Max: 63.47
Current: 0.9
0.41
63.47
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.19
DNR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
88% of the 370 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.86 vs. DNR: 0.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
DNR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 0.93 Max: 2.69
Current: 0.19
0.19
2.69
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 0.10
DNR's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 15 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.64 vs. DNR: 0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
DNR' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.02 Max: 9.27
Current: 0.1
0
9.27
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -30.14
DNR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
84% of the 513 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.91 vs. DNR: -30.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
DNR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -170.2  Med: 7 Max: 30
Current: -30.14
-170.2
30
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -1.93
DNR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
72% of the 177 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -16.06 vs. DNR: -1.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
DNR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.5  Med: 13.4 Max: 30.1
Current: -1.93
-4.5
30.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,056.21
EPS (TTM) $ -2.05
Beta4.24
Short Percentage of Float22.79%
52-Week Range $1.27 - 4.29
Shares Outstanding (Mil)398.34

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 1,111 1,119 1,315
EPS ($) 0.09 0.12 0.35
EPS without NRI ($) 0.09 0.12 0.35
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for DNR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Denbury Resources to Present at J.P. Morgan Energy Equity Conference Jun 21 2017 
Denbury Resources to Present at Energy Conferences Jun 05 2017 
Denbury Announces Release Date for First Quarter 2017 Results and Conference Call Apr 20 2017 
Denbury Announces Management Transition Plan Mar 21 2017 
Denbury Announces 2017 Capital Budget and Estimated Production; Reports Year-End 2016 Proved Reserve Feb 14 2017 
Denbury Announces Release Date for Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2016 Results and Conference Call Feb 06 2017 
Jeremy Grantham Buys Penn Virginia Jan 25 2017 
Oil Prices Lower as OPEC Meeting Approaches Sep 26 2016 
Oil Prices Gain Slightly Sep 12 2016 
Oil Prices Gaining Aug 22 2016 

More From Other Websites
Iran’s Crude Oil Exports Could Impact Crude Oil Prices Jun 27 2017
How Oil-Weighted Stocks Performed Last Week Jun 27 2017
Key Support and Resistance Levels for US Crude Oil Futures Jun 26 2017
What US Crude Oil Inventories Mean for Oil Jun 22 2017
EnerCom The Oil & Gas Conference(R): 2017 Registrations Outpacing 2016 Jun 21 2017
Denbury Resources to Present at J.P. Morgan Energy Equity Conference Jun 21 2017
A Glance at Future Prospects for the Crude Oil Market Jun 21 2017
US Crude Oil Inventories and Oversupply Concerns Jun 21 2017
Crude Oil Storage in Tankers Hit a 2017 High Jun 20 2017
Chart in Focus: Stone Energy’s Lifting Costs Jun 20 2017
Fed Raised the Interest Rate: Will It Pressure Crude Oil Prices? Jun 19 2017
Are Options Traders Betting on a Big Move in Denbury Resources (DNR) Stock? Jun 14 2017
Weak Oil: Oil-Weighted Stocks That Are Losing Jun 13 2017
US Distillate Inventories Rose for the Second Week Jun 09 2017
Why These 3 Oil Stocks Fell More Than 17% in May Jun 09 2017
Decoding Weekly and Monthly US Crude Oil Production Jun 09 2017
Why Is Denbury (DNR) Down 17.6% Since the Last Earnings Report? Jun 08 2017
Why Denbury Resources, IDT, and Duluth Holdings Slumped Today Jun 07 2017
Libya’s Crude Oil Production Could Rise in June Jun 07 2017
Oil Stocks Surge After Traders Make a Big Bet on Bullish Data Jun 06 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}