Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico, Peru

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.16
GRAM's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
80% of the 1031 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. GRAM: 0.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
GRAM' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 0.8 Max: N/A
Current: 0.16
Equity-to-Asset 0.28
GRAM's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
76% of the 1007 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. GRAM: 0.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
GRAM' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 0.3 Max: 0.44
Current: 0.28
0.27
0.44
Interest Coverage 1.70
GRAM's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
91% of the 862 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 24.43 vs. GRAM: 1.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
GRAM' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.57  Med: 11.12 Max: 30.69
Current: 1.7
1.57
30.69
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 1.24
Beneish M-Score: -2.82
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 5.10
GRAM's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
57% of the 1016 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.01 vs. GRAM: 5.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
GRAM' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.21  Med: 11.34 Max: 16.14
Current: 5.1
4.21
16.14
Net Margin % 0.28
GRAM's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
76% of the 1021 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.42 vs. GRAM: 0.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
GRAM' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 6.18 Max: 10.1
Current: 0.28
0.14
10.1
ROE % 0.63
GRAM's ROE % is ranked lower than
76% of the 1016 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.81 vs. GRAM: 0.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
GRAM' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 21.65 Max: 32.97
Current: 0.63
0.33
32.97
ROA % 0.18
GRAM's ROA % is ranked lower than
76% of the 1038 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.13 vs. GRAM: 0.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
GRAM' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 6.84 Max: 12.51
Current: 0.18
0.09
12.51
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 10.58
GRAM's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
66% of the 1030 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 17.74 vs. GRAM: 10.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
GRAM' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.56  Med: 44.48 Max: 81.84
Current: 10.58
8.56
81.84
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -2.70
GRAM's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
67% of the 845 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.70 vs. GRAM: -2.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
GRAM' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 10 Max: 39.6
Current: -2.7
0
39.6
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -19.10
GRAM's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
87% of the 691 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.90 vs. GRAM: -19.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
GRAM' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -10.1 Max: 27.4
Current: -19.1
0
27.4
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -71.00
GRAM's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
98% of the 632 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.60 vs. GRAM: -71.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
GRAM' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -20.3 Max: 29.1
Current: -71
0
29.1
GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with Grana y Montero SAA $GRAM.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» GRAM's 30-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

GRAM Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 88,600 sh (-53.51%)
» More
Q3 2016

GRAM Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Jim Simons 149,500 sh (+68.74%)
» More
Q4 2016

GRAM Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 316,289 sh (+111.56%)
» More
Q1 2017

GRAM Guru Trades in Q1 2017

George Soros 727,932 sh (New)
Jim Simons 15,660 sh (-95.05%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with GRAM

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Engineering & Construction » Engineering & Construction  
Compare:OTCPK:DRTTF, NAS:NVEE, NAS:IESC, OTCPK:MURZY, OTCPK:CSCMY, NYSE:AMRC, OTCPK:BIRDF, NAS:STRL, NAS:WLDN, NAS:VSEC, NAS:GLDD, NAS:MYRG, OTCPK:LOUIF, NYSE:ORN, NYSE:TRR, OTCPK:MRGE, OTCPK:IBIBF, NAS:LAYN, OTCPK:BADFF, AMEX:GV » details
Traded in other countries:GPAB.Germany, GRAM N.Mexico, GRAMONC1.Peru,
Headquarter Location:Peru
Grana y Montero SAA is a Peruvian engineering firm. It provides procurement, and construction services for sectors, including mining, power, infrastructure, hotels, and others.

Grana y Montero is a Peru-based company that is primarily engaged in four segments. The company's engineering and construction segment provides engineering, procurement, and construction services for sectors, including mining, power, infrastructure, hotels, and others. The infrastructure segment is engaged in oil and gas exploration and production, natural gas processing, terminal operation, road concessions, and others. The real estate segment develops residential and commercial buildings, shopping centers, industrial lots, and so on. The technical services segment provides services including business process outsourcing, infrastructure management and maintenance, electrical infrastructure installation and maintenance, and others. Grana y Montero primarily operates in Latin America.

Top Ranked Articles about Grana y Montero SAA

APRIL 28 DEADLINE: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Montero S.A.A. and Reminds Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm
DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Graña y Montero S.A.A. (GRAM) & Lead Plaintiff Deadline: April 28, 2017
The Klein Law Firm Reminds Investors of the Commencement of a Class Action Filed on Behalf of Graña y Montero S.A.A. Shareholders and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of April 28, 2017 (GRAM)
GRAÑA Y MONTERO SHAREHOLDER ALERT BY FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL: KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC REMINDS INVESTORS WITH LOSSES IN EXCESS OF $100,000 of Lead Plaintiff Deadline in Class Action Lawsuit Against Graña y Montero S.A.A. – (GRAM)
DEADLINE ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Montero S.A.A. and Reminds Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm
GRAM INVESTOR ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Reminds Investors of a Class Action Involving Graña y Montero S.A.A. and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of April 28, 2017
The Klein Law Firm Announces the Commencement of a Class Action Filed on Behalf of Graña y Montero S.A.A. Shareholders and a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of April 28, 2017 (GRAM)
INVESTOR ALERT: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Montero S.A.A. and Reminds Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Montero S.A.A. and Reminds Investors with Losses to Contact the Firm
GRAM LOSS NOTICE: Rosen Law Firm Reminds Graña y Montero S.A.A. Investors of Important Deadline in First-Filed Class Action – GRAM

NEW YORK, March 28, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of Graña y Montero S.A.A. American Depositary Shares (:GRAM) from April 30, 2014 through February 24, 2017, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”) of the April 28, 2017 lead plaintiff deadline in the class action lawsuit filed by Rosen Law Firm. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Graña y Montero investors under the federal securities laws. To join the Graña y Montero class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1060.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] or [email protected] for information on the class action. NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Graña y Montero was aware that its Brazilian partner Odebrecht S.A. paid bribes to former Peruvian President Alejandro Toledo to win construction work on a road traveling from Peru to Brazil; and (2) as a result, defendants’ statements about Graña y Montero’s business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. On February 24, 2017, Reuters published an article highlighting a report that Graña y Montero knew about $20 million in bribes paid to former Peruvian President Alejandro Toledo by its partner Odebrecht. On this news, shares of Graña y Montero fell $1.77 per share or over 34% to close $3.32 per share on February 24, 2017. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 28, 2017. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-1060.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim or Kevin Chan of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via email at [email protected] or [email protected]. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm. Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Attorney Advertising.  Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Contact Information:

Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
Kevin Chan, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com

Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 68.03
GRAM's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
97% of the 804 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.80 vs. GRAM: 68.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
GRAM' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.55  Med: 19.03 Max: 383.08
Current: 68.03
8.55
383.08
PE Ratio without NRI 102.02
GRAM's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
97% of the 801 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.67 vs. GRAM: 102.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
GRAM' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.58  Med: 18.92 Max: 498
Current: 102.02
8.58
498
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 4.66
GRAM's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
84% of the 491 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 13.16 vs. GRAM: 4.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
GRAM' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.36  Med: 6.41 Max: 12.77
Current: 4.66
3.36
12.77
PB Ratio 0.51
GRAM's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 1003 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. GRAM: 0.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
GRAM' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.37  Med: 1.42 Max: 4.59
Current: 0.51
0.37
4.59
PS Ratio 0.21
GRAM's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
87% of the 982 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. GRAM: 0.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
GRAM' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.81 Max: 4.63
Current: 0.21
0.14
4.63
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 4.82
GRAM's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
68% of the 352 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.14 vs. GRAM: 4.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
GRAM' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.48  Med: 14.29 Max: 33.82
Current: 4.82
3.48
33.82
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 2.51
GRAM's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
83% of the 448 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.07 vs. GRAM: 2.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
GRAM' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.81  Med: 10.98 Max: 49.54
Current: 2.51
1.81
49.54
EV-to-EBIT 13.75
GRAM's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
63% of the 1022 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.82 vs. GRAM: 13.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
GRAM' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.6  Med: 13.1 Max: 33.6
Current: 13.75
7.6
33.6
EV-to-EBITDA 8.42
GRAM's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
56% of the 1058 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.37 vs. GRAM: 8.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
GRAM' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.9  Med: 9.05 Max: 24.8
Current: 8.42
5.9
24.8
Current Ratio 1.43
GRAM's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
52% of the 957 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. GRAM: 1.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
GRAM' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.15  Med: 1.36 Max: 1.62
Current: 1.43
1.15
1.62
Quick Ratio 1.16
GRAM's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
59% of the 957 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. GRAM: 1.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
GRAM' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.61  Med: 0.8 Max: 1.17
Current: 1.16
0.61
1.17
Days Inventory 95.97
GRAM's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
78% of the 840 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 25.59 vs. GRAM: 95.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
GRAM' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.64  Med: 64.04 Max: 110.14
Current: 95.97
18.64
110.14
Days Sales Outstanding 110.38
GRAM's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
80% of the 742 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 72.76 vs. GRAM: 110.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
GRAM' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 31.83  Med: 75.55 Max: 150.96
Current: 110.38
31.83
150.96
Days Payable 144.78
GRAM's Days Payable is ranked higher than
80% of the 657 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 82.51 vs. GRAM: 144.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
GRAM' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 47.12  Med: 118.64 Max: 183.33
Current: 144.78
47.12
183.33

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 2.28
GRAM's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
52% of the 1096 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.38 vs. GRAM: 2.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
GRAM' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 1.76 Max: 9.94
Current: 2.28
0.8
9.94
Dividend Payout Ratio 1.83
GRAM's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 632 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.29 vs. GRAM: 1.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
GRAM' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.29 Max: 3.62
Current: 1.83
0.11
3.62
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -33.00
GRAM's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
78% of the 480 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.60 vs. GRAM: -33.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
GRAM' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 9.2 Max: 48.1
Current: -33
0
48.1
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.37
GRAM's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
60% of the 1369 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.90 vs. GRAM: 1.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
GRAM' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 1.06 Max: 5.97
Current: 1.37
0.48
5.97

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 0.83
GRAM's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
71% of the 913 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.47 vs. GRAM: 0.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
GRAM' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.73  Med: 2.34 Max: 6.67
Current: 0.83
0.73
6.67
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 2.21
GRAM's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
75% of the 472 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. GRAM: 2.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
GRAM' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.08  Med: 5.76 Max: 6.72
Current: 2.21
2.08
6.72
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.28
GRAM's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
97% of the 840 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. GRAM: 0.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
GRAM' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 1.07 Max: 5.31
Current: 0.28
0.2
5.31
Price-to-Graham-Number 1.94
GRAM's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
81% of the 630 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.98 vs. GRAM: 1.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
GRAM' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.7  Med: 1.47 Max: 6.44
Current: 1.94
0.7
6.44
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 7.26
GRAM's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
51% of the 1251 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.84 vs. GRAM: 7.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
GRAM' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3  Med: 7.6 Max: 13.1
Current: 7.26
3
13.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -19.92
GRAM's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 495 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.44 vs. GRAM: -19.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
GRAM' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -25.5  Med: -19.6 Max: -15.9
Current: -19.92
-25.5
-15.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,853
EPS (TTM) $ 0.04
Beta0.86
Short Percentage of Float0.00%
52-Week Range $2.16 - 8.96
Shares Outstanding (Mil)132.01
» More Articles for GRAM

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Reminds Graña y Montero S.A.A. Investors of Important April 28 Deadline in Fi Apr 27 2017 
APRIL 28 DEADLINE: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Mo Apr 27 2017 
2-DAY DEADLINE: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Montero Apr 26 2017 
DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Grañ Apr 26 2017 
FRIDAY DEADLINE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Montero S. Apr 24 2017 
The Klein Law Firm Reminds Investors of the Commencement of a Class Action Filed on Behalf of Graà Apr 24 2017 
GRAÑA Y MONTERO SHAREHOLDER ALERT BY FORMER LOUISIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL: KAHN SWICK & FOTI, LLC RE Apr 21 2017 
DEADLINE ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Montero S Apr 20 2017 
GRAM INVESTOR ALERT: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong Reminds Investors of a Class Action Involving G Apr 14 2017 
Scott+Scott, Attorneys at Law, LLP Reminds Investors of Upcoming Deadline to File Lead Plaintiff Pap Apr 12 2017 

More From Other Websites
Graña Y Montero: Evaluation of Its Financials, Delays Annual Report to the Security Exchange... May 17 2017
Graña y Montero closes the sale of its stake in PRINSUR for US$ 25 million Apr 28 2017
The Graña y Montero Group’s Net Income in 1Q2017 Reached s/. 79.1 MM Apr 28 2017
DEADLINE TODAY: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Montero... Apr 28 2017
Peru's Grana y Montero reports $24.4 million profit Apr 28 2017
DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Graña... Apr 28 2017
Graña y Montero Announces Consolidated Results for 1Q2017 Apr 28 2017
DEADLINE TOMORROW: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Montero... Apr 27 2017
ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Reminds Graña y Montero S.A.A. Investors of Important April 28 Deadline in... Apr 27 2017
FINAL DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against... Apr 27 2017
APRIL 28 DEADLINE: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y... Apr 27 2017
April 28 Deadline Alert: Law Offices of Howard G. Smith Reminds Graña y Montero S.A.A. Investors of... Apr 27 2017
DEADLINE TOMORROW: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Reminds Investors of Graña y Montero S.A.A. of a Class... Apr 27 2017
APRIL 28 DEADLINE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Montero... Apr 26 2017
The Klein Law Firm Reminds Investors of a Class Action Filed on Behalf of Graña y Montero S.A.A.... Apr 26 2017
2-DAY DEADLINE: Khang & Khang LLP Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Montero... Apr 26 2017
DEADLINE ALERT: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Reminds Investors of Class Action Against Graña... Apr 26 2017
GRAÑA Y MONTERO 72 HOUR DEADLINE ALERT: Approximately 72 Hours Remain; Former Louisiana Attorney... Apr 25 2017
Graña Y Montero Closes the Sale of Its Stake in COGA for US$ 21.5 Million Apr 24 2017
FRIDAY DEADLINE: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit against Graña y Montero... Apr 24 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)