Switch to:
Also traded in: Canada, Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.29
LIMAF's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
66% of the 1274 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. LIMAF: 0.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
LIMAF' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.28 Max: N/A
Current: 0.29
Equity-to-Asset 0.49
LIMAF's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
51% of the 1258 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. LIMAF: 0.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
LIMAF' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.52 Max: 0.7
Current: 0.49
0.41
0.7
Interest Coverage 20.02
LIMAF's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
52% of the 1120 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 17.77 vs. LIMAF: 20.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
LIMAF' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.75  Med: 10.45 Max: 22.86
Current: 20.02
4.75
22.86
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 3.14
Beneish M-Score: -2.67
WACC vs ROIC
6.96%
15.03%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 11.67
LIMAF's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
81% of the 1283 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 5.47 vs. LIMAF: 11.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
LIMAF' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.01  Med: 7.11 Max: 11.67
Current: 11.67
-3.01
11.67
Net Margin % 8.80
LIMAF's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
78% of the 1283 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 3.99 vs. LIMAF: 8.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
LIMAF' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.8  Med: 4.63 Max: 8.8
Current: 8.8
-2.8
8.8
ROE % 21.54
LIMAF's ROE % is ranked higher than
84% of the 1257 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.96 vs. LIMAF: 21.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
LIMAF' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.57  Med: 13.77 Max: 22.23
Current: 21.54
-5.57
22.23
ROA % 9.96
LIMAF's ROA % is ranked higher than
82% of the 1296 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 4.04 vs. LIMAF: 9.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
LIMAF' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.76  Med: 6.35 Max: 12.94
Current: 9.96
-2.76
12.94
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 25.49
LIMAF's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
70% of the 1291 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 14.28 vs. LIMAF: 25.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
LIMAF' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.49  Med: 15.53 Max: 30.57
Current: 25.49
-5.49
30.57
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 18.20
LIMAF's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
90% of the 1138 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 3.40 vs. LIMAF: 18.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
LIMAF' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -6.6  Med: 16.4 Max: 48.1
Current: 18.2
-6.6
48.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 24.10
LIMAF's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
82% of the 1056 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 7.20 vs. LIMAF: 24.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
LIMAF' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -24.3  Med: 15.9 Max: 73.5
Current: 24.1
-24.3
73.5
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 31.00
LIMAF's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
81% of the 951 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 7.50 vs. LIMAF: 31.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
LIMAF' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19  Med: 21.4 Max: 79.2
Current: 31
-19
79.2
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Linamar Corp $LIMAF.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» LIMAF's 30-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Autos » Auto Parts    NAICS: 336330    SIC: 3259
Compare:NYSE:TEN, NYSE:VC, NYSE:DAN, NAS:DORM, OTCPK:MBUMY, OTCPK:NTXVF, OTCPK:TUUNF, NYSE:CPS, OTCPK:LNNNY, NAS:FDML, NYSE:AXL, NAS:MNRO, NYSE:MTOR, NAS:THRM, OTCPK:EGKLF, NYSE:SMP, OTCPK:BRBOF, OTCPK:JTEKY, OTCPK:UNIEF, NYSE:LDL » details
Traded in other countries:LNR.Canada, LNR.Germany,
Headquarter Location:Canada
Linamar Corp is a manufacturing company of engineered products powering vehicles, motion, work and lives. The Company is made up of two operating segments - the Powertrain / Driveline segment and the Industrial segment.

Linamar Corp was incorporated pursuant to the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on August 17, 1966. It is a diversified manufacturing company of engineered products powering vehicles, motion, work and lives. The Company is made up of 2 operating segments - the Powertrain / Driveline segment and the Industrial segment which are further divided into 4 key divisions - Manufacturing, Driveline, Industrial Commercial Energy ("ICE Group") and Skyjack, all world leaders in the design, development and production of engineered products. The Company's Manufacturing and Driveline divisions focus on precision metallic components, modules and systems for engine, transmission and driveline systems designed for passenger vehicle markets. The ICE Group concentrates on similar products for on and off highway vehicle, energy and other industrial markets. The Company's Skyjack division is noted for its high quality mobile industrial equipment, notably its aerial work platforms and telehandlers. The Powertrain/Driveline segment derives revenues from the collaborative design, development and manufacture of precision metallic components, modules and systems for vehicle and power generation markets. The Powertrain/Driveline segment manufactures precision-machined components and assemblies that are used in high-efficiency transmissions, engines and driveline systems. Its focus on transmissions is centered on gears, transmission cases, shafts, shafts and shell assemblies, clutch modules and clutch subcomponents, valve bodies, pumps, planetary gear assemblies, as well as housings/covers. In the driveline systems segment, the core product areas are power transfer units (PTUs), rear drive units (RDUs), and engineered gears. The Powertrain/Driveline segment also manufactures key components, systems and modules for today's modern engine. The primary engine components it manufactures are cylinder blocks and assemblies, cylinder heads and complete head assemblies, camshaft assemblies, connecting rods, flywheels, fuel rails and fuel body/pump assemblies as well as housings/covers, liners, vacuum pumps, oil pumps and water pumps. In addition, it has the capability to provide fully assembled niche engine programs. The Powertrain/Driveline segment has 31 manufacturing locations, 3 R&D centers and 7 sales offices in 7 countries in North America, Europe and Asia. The principal customers for the Powertrain/Driveline Segment are OEMs with operations in North America and their suppliers, including CAT, Chrysler, Ford and GM. The Company's Powertrain/Driveline has operations in Europe. The Industrial Segment serves a variety of markets as noted above but is notably a manufacturer of aerial work platforms, focused on production of the industry's reliable scissor lifts. Products include both battery-powered and combustion engine powered scissor lifts, telescopic boom lifts, telehandlers and other aerial work platforms. The Industrial Segment has 57 manufacturing location

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 7.93
LIMAF's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
90% of the 1049 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 17.55 vs. LIMAF: 7.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
LIMAF' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.85  Med: 10.88 Max: 22.04
Current: 7.93
2.85
22.04
Forward PE Ratio 7.75
LIMAF's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
79% of the 116 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 10.59 vs. LIMAF: 7.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 7.93
LIMAF's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
90% of the 1048 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 17.70 vs. LIMAF: 7.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
LIMAF' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.13  Med: 11.06 Max: 58.86
Current: 7.93
3.13
58.86
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 8.20
LIMAF's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
86% of the 570 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 18.15 vs. LIMAF: 8.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
LIMAF' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.17  Med: 12.36 Max: 112.77
Current: 8.2
1.17
112.77
PB Ratio 1.56
LIMAF's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 1237 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.68 vs. LIMAF: 1.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
LIMAF' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 1.44 Max: 3.07
Current: 1.56
0.17
3.07
PS Ratio 0.69
LIMAF's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
59% of the 1254 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.85 vs. LIMAF: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
LIMAF' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.59 Max: 1.28
Current: 0.69
0.07
1.28
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 8.99
LIMAF's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
79% of the 443 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 15.47 vs. LIMAF: 8.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
LIMAF' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.28  Med: 12.98 Max: 502.16
Current: 8.99
1.28
502.16
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 5.14
LIMAF's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
77% of the 596 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 9.05 vs. LIMAF: 5.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
LIMAF' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 4.85 Max: 10.31
Current: 5.14
0.5
10.31
EV-to-EBIT 6.81
LIMAF's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
87% of the 1094 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 13.83 vs. LIMAF: 6.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
LIMAF' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -64.2  Med: 9.2 Max: 34.1
Current: 6.81
-64.2
34.1
EV-to-EBITDA 4.68
LIMAF's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
90% of the 1139 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 10.21 vs. LIMAF: 4.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
LIMAF' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.3  Med: 5.3 Max: 10.8
Current: 4.68
1.3
10.8
PEG Ratio 0.29
LIMAF's PEG Ratio is ranked higher than
95% of the 613 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.52 vs. LIMAF: 0.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
LIMAF' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.47 Max: 18.86
Current: 0.29
0.21
18.86
Shiller PE Ratio 19.55
LIMAF's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 301 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 23.86 vs. LIMAF: 19.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
LIMAF' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.02  Med: 17.96 Max: 41.54
Current: 19.55
2.02
41.54
Current Ratio 1.71
LIMAF's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 1249 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.52 vs. LIMAF: 1.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
LIMAF' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.99  Med: 1.51 Max: 2.34
Current: 1.71
0.99
2.34
Quick Ratio 1.22
LIMAF's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
58% of the 1249 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. LIMAF: 1.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
LIMAF' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.69  Med: 1.03 Max: 1.92
Current: 1.22
0.69
1.92
Days Inventory 48.62
LIMAF's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
60% of the 1239 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 56.79 vs. LIMAF: 48.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
LIMAF' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 42.31  Med: 48.02 Max: 64.76
Current: 48.62
42.31
64.76
Days Sales Outstanding 69.29
LIMAF's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
56% of the 1045 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 62.72 vs. LIMAF: 69.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
LIMAF' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 56.17  Med: 60.67 Max: 73.17
Current: 69.29
56.17
73.17

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 0.51
LIMAF's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
86% of the 1364 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. LIMAF: 0.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
LIMAF' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 1.12 Max: 9.13
Current: 0.51
0.47
9.13
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.04
LIMAF's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
98% of the 825 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 0.27 vs. LIMAF: 0.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
LIMAF' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.14 Max: 0.32
Current: 0.04
0.04
0.32
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 7.70
LIMAF's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
50% of the 671 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 7.70 vs. LIMAF: 7.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
LIMAF' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 7.7 Max: 38.7
Current: 7.7
0
38.7
Forward Dividend Yield % 0.75
LIMAF's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
85% of the 1325 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.11 vs. LIMAF: 0.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 0.68
LIMAF's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
81% of the 1645 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 2.56 vs. LIMAF: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
LIMAF' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 1.49 Max: 12.16
Current: 0.68
0.63
12.16
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.60
LIMAF's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
61% of the 612 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: -1.90 vs. LIMAF: -0.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
LIMAF' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.6  Med: -0.2 Max: 3.5
Current: -0.6
-2.6
3.5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 2.13
LIMAF's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
53% of the 1193 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.88 vs. LIMAF: 2.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
LIMAF' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 1.63 Max: 6.01
Current: 2.13
0.21
6.01
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.73
LIMAF's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
84% of the 650 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. LIMAF: 0.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
LIMAF' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 1.72 Max: 24.22
Current: 0.73
0.18
24.22
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.19
LIMAF's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
56% of the 1195 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.22 vs. LIMAF: 1.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
LIMAF' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 1.04 Max: 4.71
Current: 1.19
0.14
4.71
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 0.32
LIMAF's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked higher than
96% of the 394 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. LIMAF: 0.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
LIMAF' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.65 Max: 2.71
Current: 0.32
0.25
2.71
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.87
LIMAF's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
71% of the 948 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. LIMAF: 0.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
LIMAF' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 1.01 Max: 2.53
Current: 0.87
0.25
2.53
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 14.65
LIMAF's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
89% of the 1293 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 6.15 vs. LIMAF: 14.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
LIMAF' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -6.5  Med: 10.4 Max: 29
Current: 14.65
-6.5
29
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 32.74
LIMAF's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
91% of the 784 Companies
in the Global Auto Parts industry.

( Industry Median: 8.34 vs. LIMAF: 32.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
LIMAF' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.6  Med: 16.6 Max: 41
Current: 32.74
-9.6
41

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $4,663.34
EPS (TTM) $ 6.24
Beta1.94
Short Percentage of Float0.00%
52-Week Range $32.57 - 49.03
Shares Outstanding (Mil)65.08

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 4,809 5,142 5,627
EPS ($) 6.10 6.44 7.07
EPS without NRI ($) 6.10 6.44 7.07
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for LIMAF

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Canadian Auto Parts Manufacturer Is on Sale Feb 23 2017 
Wasatch Invests in 13 New Stakes in Second Quarter Sep 17 2015 
Profit from Economically-Sensitive Stocks: BEAM, L, LUK, TSX: AW.UN, TSX: LNR Apr 06 2013 

More From Other Websites
Linamar Corp. :LIMAF-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2017 By the Numbers : June 20, 2017 Jun 20 2017
Linamar Corp. : LIMAF-US: Dividend Analysis : May 23rd, 2017 (record date) : By the numbers : May... May 23 2017
Linamar Corp. – Value Analysis (US OTC:LIMAF) : May 15, 2017 May 15 2017
Linamar Corp. : Fairly valued, but may deserve another look May 12 2017
Linamar Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : LIMAF-US : May 12, 2017 May 12 2017
[$$] Linamar: Driving for More Of the Auto-Parts Market Apr 15 2017
Linamar Corp. : LIMAF-US: Dividend Analysis : April 03rd, 2017 (record date) : By the numbers :... Apr 12 2017
Linamar Corp. :LIMAF-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : March 30, 2017 Mar 30 2017
Linamar profit beats estimates on Montupet buy Mar 08 2017
Linamar quarterly profit rises nearly 22 pct Mar 08 2017
This Canadian Auto Parts Manufacturer Is on Sale Feb 23 2017
Linamar Corp. – Value Analysis (US OTC:LIMAF) : January 23, 2017 Jan 23 2017
Linamar Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : LIMAF-US : January 20, 2017 Jan 20 2017
Linamar CEO: Border Tax Could Hurt The Consumer Jan 11 2017
TSX Movers: Dream Office REIT, New Flyer Industries Aug 11 2016
Delphi, Linamar to build new plants in Morocco-minister Jul 04 2016
Hasenfratz: Designing Products for New Players Like Apple Jun 16 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}