Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.05
MOC's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
77% of the 283 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.62 vs. MOC: 0.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
MOC' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.09  Med: 0.05 Max: 0.59
Current: 0.05
-0.09
0.59
Equity-to-Asset 0.33
MOC's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
64% of the 283 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. MOC: 0.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
MOC' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.4 Max: 0.6
Current: 0.33
0.07
0.6
Debt-to-Equity 1.20
MOC's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
54% of the 218 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.61 vs. MOC: 1.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
MOC' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.88 Max: 9.81
Current: 1.2
0.2
9.81
Debt-to-EBITDA -10.16
MOC's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 196 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.00 vs. MOC: -10.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-EBITDA only.
MOC' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.16  Med: 2.47 Max: 4.7
Current: -10.16
-10.16
4.7
Piotroski F-Score: 3
Altman Z-Score: 4.23
Beneish M-Score: -1.77
WACC vs ROIC
1.78%
-1.37%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -0.10
MOC's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
72% of the 283 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.92 vs. MOC: -0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
MOC' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.16  Med: 1.52 Max: 2.54
Current: -0.1
-3.16
2.54
Net Margin % -1.42
MOC's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
71% of the 284 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.62 vs. MOC: -1.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
MOC' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2  Med: 0.81 Max: 2.07
Current: -1.42
-2
2.07
ROE % -14.65
MOC's ROE % is ranked lower than
82% of the 277 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 6.85 vs. MOC: -14.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
MOC' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.65  Med: 6.31 Max: 22.03
Current: -14.65
-14.65
22.03
ROA % -5.67
MOC's ROA % is ranked lower than
79% of the 287 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.47 vs. MOC: -5.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
MOC' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.3  Med: 3.02 Max: 8.51
Current: -5.67
-7.3
8.51
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -9.37
MOC's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
80% of the 282 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 9.29 vs. MOC: -9.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
MOC' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -24.29  Med: 13.19 Max: 20.07
Current: -9.37
-24.29
20.07
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Command Security Corp MOC.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» MOC's 30-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with MOC

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Consulting & Outsourcing » Security & Protection Services    NAICS: 561612    SIC: 7381
Compare:LSE:DGB, ASX:HIL, SGX:43B, NGO:6797, OSTO:FIRE, HKSE:08409, BOM:532854, XKRX:170790, NAS:NXTD, HKSE:08315, SGX:42N, TSE:7464, ROCO:6556, OTCPK:MACE, XKRX:067920, OTCPK:RSKIA, ROCO:6417, NAS:SPCB, LSE:IGE, BOM:539400 » details
Traded in other countries:490.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Command Security Corp is a provider of uniformed security officers and aviation security services to commercial, financial, industrial, aviation and governmental customers in the the United States.

Command Security Corp is a provider of uniformed security officers and aviation security services to commercial, financial, industrial, aviation and governmental customers in the the United States.

Top Ranked Articles about Command Security Corp

Command Security Corporation Reports Financial Results for the Second Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2017
Command Security Corporation Announces $11 Million Contract Award From the United States Department of State
Command Security Corporation Reports Financial Results for the First Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2017
Command Security Corporation Announces Decision to Terminate Customer Relationship With Transportation Company
Command Security Corporation Reports Financial Results for the Three Months and Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2017
Command Security Corporation Announces $50M Contract Award
Command Security Corporation Announces $80M Contract Award
Command Security Corporation Announces Election of Jerry L. Johnson as New Member of the Board of Directors

HERNDON, Va., March 08, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Command Security Corporation ( MKT:MOC) today announced the election of Jerry L. Johnson as a member of the Board of Directors, effective March 6, 2017. Mr. Johnson will also serve on the Board’s Audit and Compensation Committees.
Jerry L. Johnson is a founding member and Managing Director of the private equity firm RLJ Equity Partners. Mr. Johnson has been involved in all aspects of RLJ Equity Partners’ development since 2007. RLJ Equity Partners acquires controlling positions in crucial economic sectors including business services, value-added manufacturing and logistics. Johnson has led RLJ’s control investments in several business services companies, including Media Source (exited), Naylor Association Solutions, MarketCast, Phase One and Envirovac.  Mr. Johnson has supported the firms’ portfolio by sourcing and/or executing several add-on investments which include Boxwood (which was acquired by Naylor), Timberlake (which was acquired by Naylor) and Zak (which was acquired by LAI International). In addition, he led the international co-investments alongside the Carlyle Group in Tok & Stok, and CVC International (which undertook an exit IPO as CVCB3). Mr. Johnson’s early career includes experience advising Fortune 500 Companies as an investment banker with Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette and as a consultant with McKinsey & Company. In 2004, Mr. Johnson was appointed by President George W. Bush as a White House Fellow to serve as a Special Assistant to the Secretary of Defense. Mr. Johnson’s work on the Quadrennial Defense Review earned him the Secretary of Defense Medal for Exceptional Public Service. Mr. Johnson received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and his B.S. in Chemical Engineering, summa cum laude, from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Thomas Kikis, Chairman of the Board of Command Security, said, "Command Security is extremely fortunate to have someone of Jerry’s experience, integrity and knowledge to serve on our Board. He will add valuable insights and oversight over a wide range of financial, operational and strategic topics important to our Company's future.” “I am honored to have been asked to join Command Security’s board,” said Jerry Johnson. “They have a great reputation and Command Security is very well positioned in the areas of homeland security and physical security to achieve significant success and I look forward to adding my perspective to their strategic thinking.” About Command Security Corporation Command Security Corporation and its Aviation Safeguards division provide uniformed security officers and aviation security services to commercial, financial, industrial, aviation and governmental customers throughout the United States. As our credo states “Securing All You Value,” we safeguard against theft, fraud, fire, intrusion, vandalism and the many other threats that our customers are facing today. By partnering with each customer, we design programs customized to meet their specific security needs and address their particular concerns. We bring years of expertise, including sophisticated systems for hiring, training, supervision and oversight, backed by cutting-edge technology, to every situation that our customers face involving security. Our mission is to enable our customers to operate their businesses without disruption or loss, and to create safe environments for their employees. For more information concerning our company, please refer to our website at www.commandsecurity.com. Forward-Looking Statements This announcement by Command Security Corporation (the “Company”) contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 about the Company, including regarding the potential value added by the election of Mr. Johnson and the potential for the Company to achieve success in the areas of homeland security and physical security, that are based on management’s assumptions, expectations and projections about the Company. Such forward-looking statements by their nature involve a degree of risk and uncertainty. The Company cautions that actual results of the Company could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to the factors described under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, and the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2016, each of which has been filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and such other risks disclosed from time to time in the Company’s periodic and other reports filed with the SEC. You should consider the areas of risk described above in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made by the Company. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any additional disclosures the Company makes in proxy statements, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, annual reports on Form 10-K and current reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC, which are publicly available at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.
Command Security Corporation N. Paul Brost,
Chief Financial Officer
703-464-4735

Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PB Ratio 1.84
MOC's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 275 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.77 vs. MOC: 1.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
MOC' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 1.27 Max: 3.97
Current: 1.84
0.56
3.97
PS Ratio 0.18
MOC's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
96% of the 278 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. MOC: 0.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
MOC' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.16 Max: 0.42
Current: 0.18
0.07
0.42
EV-to-EBIT -21.54
MOC's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 208 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 15.95 vs. MOC: -21.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
MOC' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -56.6  Med: 11.2 Max: 68.6
Current: -21.54
-56.6
68.6
EV-to-EBITDA -25.30
MOC's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 227 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.41 vs. MOC: -25.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
MOC' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -56  Med: 9 Max: 182.7
Current: -25.3
-56
182.7
EV-to-Revenue 0.28
MOC's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
96% of the 279 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.76 vs. MOC: 0.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
MOC' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.2 Max: 0.5
Current: 0.28
0.1
0.5
Shiller PE Ratio 67.93
MOC's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
91% of the 55 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 21.33 vs. MOC: 67.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
MOC' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.54  Med: 26.88 Max: 101.25
Current: 67.93
10.54
101.25
Current Ratio 1.33
MOC's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 274 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.69 vs. MOC: 1.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
MOC' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.92  Med: 1.35 Max: 2.04
Current: 1.33
0.92
2.04
Quick Ratio 1.33
MOC's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
51% of the 274 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.37 vs. MOC: 1.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
MOC' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.92  Med: 1.35 Max: 2.04
Current: 1.33
0.92
2.04
Days Sales Outstanding 80.95
MOC's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
51% of the 227 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 65.88 vs. MOC: 80.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
MOC' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 53.14  Med: 59.51 Max: 80.95
Current: 80.95
53.14
80.95
Days Payable 2.22
MOC's Days Payable is ranked lower than
96% of the 193 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 53.56 vs. MOC: 2.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
MOC' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.02  Med: 2.93 Max: 3.63
Current: 2.22
1.02
3.63

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -1.20
MOC's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
58% of the 182 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: -2.20 vs. MOC: -1.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
MOC' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -48.2  Med: -0.4 Max: 5.8
Current: -1.2
-48.2
5.8

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 2.96
MOC's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked higher than
62% of the 136 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.91 vs. MOC: 2.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
MOC' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.92  Med: 3.29 Max: 85
Current: 2.96
0.92
85
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.96
MOC's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked higher than
50% of the 250 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. MOC: 1.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
MOC' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.69  Med: 2.35 Max: 24.41
Current: 1.96
0.69
24.41
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 5.22
MOC's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
62% of the 138 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.69 vs. MOC: 5.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
MOC' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.84 Max: 191
Current: 5.22
0.23
191
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.10
MOC's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
55% of the 248 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. MOC: 1.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
MOC' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 0.95 Max: 3.76
Current: 1.1
0.27
3.76
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -4.64
MOC's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
84% of the 286 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 3.82 vs. MOC: -4.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
MOC' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -15.9  Med: 6.3 Max: 15.7
Current: -4.64
-15.9
15.7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -7.65
MOC's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
75% of the 154 Companies
in the Global Security & Protection Services industry.

( Industry Median: 5.05 vs. MOC: -7.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
MOC' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.65  Med: 10.35 Max: 1206.3
Current: -7.65
-7.65
1206.3

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $176.98
EPS (TTM) $ -0.26
Beta-0.14
Short Percentage of Float1.14%
52-Week Range $2.41 - 3.43
Shares Outstanding (Mil)9.85

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 33
Positive ROAN
Positive CFROAN
Higher ROA yoyN
CFROA > ROAN
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyN
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}