Switch to:
Also traded in: Belgium, Germany, Mexico, Switzerland, UK

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.15
NAS:GT's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
79% of the 1262 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.59 vs. NAS:GT: 0.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NAS:GT' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.19 Max: 0.73
Current: 0.15
0.04
0.73
Equity-to-Asset 0.28
NAS:GT's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
82% of the 1243 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. NAS:GT: 0.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NAS:GT' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.05  Med: 0.22 Max: 0.35
Current: 0.28
-0.05
0.35
Debt-to-Equity 1.24
NAS:GT's Debt-to-Equity is ranked lower than
82% of the 1093 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. NAS:GT: 1.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Debt-to-Equity only.
NAS:GT' s Debt-to-Equity Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -158.97  Med: 1.45 Max: 128.73
Current: 1.24
-158.97
128.73
Interest Coverage 3.94
NAS:GT's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
78% of the 1107 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 18.28 vs. NAS:GT: 3.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NAS:GT' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.61  Med: 3.11 Max: 4.22
Current: 3.94
1.61
4.22
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 2.09
Beneish M-Score: -2.57
WACC vs ROIC
9.75%
15.89%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 9.28
NAS:GT's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
76% of the 1268 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 5.58 vs. NAS:GT: 9.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NAS:GT' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.04  Med: 4.99 Max: 10.35
Current: 9.28
-0.04
10.35
Net Margin % 7.95
NAS:GT's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
77% of the 1268 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 4.05 vs. NAS:GT: 7.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NAS:GT' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.3  Med: 1.69 Max: 13.52
Current: 7.95
-2.3
13.52
ROE % 26.11
NAS:GT's ROE % is ranked higher than
91% of the 1242 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 9.10 vs. NAS:GT: 26.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NAS:GT' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.69  Med: 31.36 Max: 93.75
Current: 26.11
-42.69
93.75
ROA % 6.98
NAS:GT's ROA % is ranked higher than
72% of the 1281 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 4.10 vs. NAS:GT: 6.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NAS:GT' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.53  Med: 1.92 Max: 13.79
Current: 6.98
-2.53
13.79
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 17.36
NAS:GT's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
61% of the 1276 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 14.48 vs. NAS:GT: 17.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NAS:GT' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.59  Med: 12.17 Max: 21.64
Current: 17.36
-0.59
21.64
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -6.90
NAS:GT's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
80% of the 1124 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.10 vs. NAS:GT: -6.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NAS:GT' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.9  Med: -1.3 Max: 10.3
Current: -6.9
-13.9
10.3
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 7.60
NAS:GT's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
52% of the 1045 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 6.90 vs. NAS:GT: 7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NAS:GT' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -39.9  Med: -0.2 Max: 67.4
Current: 7.6
-39.9
67.4
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 27.60
NAS:GT's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
78% of the 952 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 7.10 vs. NAS:GT: 27.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NAS:GT' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -54.5  Med: 1.9 Max: 91
Current: 27.6
-54.5
91
GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co $NAS:GT.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NAS:GT's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-10-28 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2016

GT Guru Trades in Q3 2016

T Boone Pickens 271,570 sh (+43.32%)
David Tepper 859,076 sh (+21.15%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 3,634,336 sh (+14.39%)
Diamond Hill Capital 6,143,650 sh (+5.42%)
Mario Gabelli 13,600 sh (unchged)
David Dreman 11,496 sh (unchged)
Caxton Associates 350,000 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Lee Ainslie Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
John Buckingham 211,208 sh (-1.12%)
Scott Black 74,499 sh (-6.97%)
Pioneer Investments 1,488,984 sh (-11.55%)
Jeremy Grantham 176,403 sh (-45.84%)
Steven Cohen 15,000 sh (-98.55%)
» More
Q4 2016

GT Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Joel Greenblatt 257,731 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 7,340 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 110,000 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 907,500 sh (+5950.00%)
David Dreman 12,895 sh (+12.17%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 3,909,836 sh (+7.58%)
Diamond Hill Capital 6,476,443 sh (+5.42%)
Mario Gabelli 13,600 sh (unchged)
T Boone Pickens 271,570 sh (unchged)
Scott Black 74,234 sh (-0.36%)
John Buckingham 209,205 sh (-0.95%)
Jeremy Grantham 171,437 sh (-2.82%)
Pioneer Investments 1,438,213 sh (-3.41%)
David Tepper 236,951 sh (-72.42%)
» More
Q1 2017

GT Guru Trades in Q1 2017

George Soros 46,500 sh (New)
Robert Olstein 113,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 316,600 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 493,599 sh (+91.52%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 7,021,395 sh (+79.58%)
Jeremy Grantham 198,900 sh (+16.02%)
Pioneer Investments 1,448,785 sh (+0.74%)
Mario Gabelli 13,600 sh (unchged)
David Dreman 12,895 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Scott Black Sold Out
John Buckingham 202,717 sh (-3.10%)
Diamond Hill Capital 6,262,140 sh (-3.31%)
T Boone Pickens 164,710 sh (-39.35%)
David Tepper 75,951 sh (-67.95%)
Steven Cohen 100,000 sh (-88.98%)
» More
Q2 2017

GT Guru Trades in Q2 2017

First Pacific Advisors 65,200 sh (New)
Robert Olstein 167,000 sh (+47.79%)
Pioneer Investments 1,642,370 sh (+13.36%)
Diamond Hill Capital 6,528,543 sh (+4.25%)
Jeremy Grantham 202,800 sh (+1.96%)
Mario Gabelli 13,600 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
David Tepper Sold Out
George Soros Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
John Buckingham 200,900 sh (-0.90%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 6,756,895 sh (-3.77%)
David Dreman 12,305 sh (-4.58%)
Joel Greenblatt 458,183 sh (-7.18%)
T Boone Pickens 132,941 sh (-19.29%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NAS:GT

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2017-06-30 Reduce -3.77%0.04%$31.73 - $36.23 $ 32.46-6%6,756,895
Joel Greenblatt 2017-06-30 Reduce -7.18%0.02%$31.73 - $36.23 $ 32.46-6%458,183
Robert Olstein 2017-06-30 Add 47.79%0.24%$31.73 - $36.23 $ 32.46-6%167,000
T Boone Pickens 2017-06-30 Reduce -19.29%0.52%$31.73 - $36.23 $ 32.46-6%132,941
David Dreman 2017-06-30 Reduce -4.58%0.01%$31.73 - $36.23 $ 32.46-6%12,305
David Tepper 2017-06-30 Sold Out 0.04%$31.73 - $36.23 $ 32.46-6%0
George Soros 2017-06-30 Sold Out 0.05%$31.73 - $36.23 $ 32.46-6%0
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2017-03-31 Add 79.58%0.44%$30.39 - $36.88 $ 32.46-4%7,021,395
Joel Greenblatt 2017-03-31 Add 91.52%0.11%$30.39 - $36.88 $ 32.46-4%493,599
T Boone Pickens 2017-03-31 Reduce -39.35%1.03%$30.39 - $36.88 $ 32.46-4%164,710
Robert Olstein 2017-03-31 New Buy0.52%$30.39 - $36.88 $ 32.46-4%113,000
David Tepper 2017-03-31 Reduce -67.95%0.09%$30.39 - $36.88 $ 32.46-4%75,951
George Soros 2017-03-31 New Buy0.05%$30.39 - $36.88 $ 32.46-4%46,500
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2016-12-31 Add 7.58%0.03%$27.79 - $33.21 $ 32.465%3,909,836
Joel Greenblatt 2016-12-31 New Buy0.1%$27.79 - $33.21 $ 32.465%257,731
David Tepper 2016-12-31 Reduce -72.42%0.46%$27.79 - $33.21 $ 32.465%236,951
David Dreman 2016-12-31 Add 12.17%0.02%$27.79 - $33.21 $ 32.465%12,895
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2016-09-30 Add 14.39%0.06%$24.93 - $32.82 $ 32.4612%3,634,336
David Tepper 2016-09-30 Add 21.15%0.11%$24.93 - $32.82 $ 32.4612%859,076
T Boone Pickens 2016-09-30 Add 43.32%0.95%$24.93 - $32.82 $ 32.4612%271,570
Joel Greenblatt 2016-09-30 Sold Out 0.04%$24.93 - $32.82 $ 32.4612%0
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Preferred stocks of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co

SymbolPriceYieldDescription
GTPRA0.003.90

Business Description

Industry: Autos » Rubber & Plastics    NAICS: 326211    SIC: 3011
Compare:NYSE:CSL, NYSE:TSE, NYSE:CTB, NYSE:WMS, NYSE:MYE, NYSE:TG, AMEX:CMT, NAS:CTIB, OTCPK:GLGI, OTCPK:VYST, OTCPK:STCC, OTCPK:AMTY » details
Traded in other countries:GT.Belgium, GTR.Germany, GT.Mexico, GT.Switzerland, 0QLL.UK,
Headquarter Location:USA
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co is engaged in manufacturing of tires for various applications under the Goodyear brand name. It also manufactures and markets rubber-related chemicals for various applications.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co manufactures and sells a variety of rubber tires under the Goodyear brand name. The firm's tires are used for automobiles, trucks, buses, aircraft, motorcycles, mining equipment, farm equipment, and industrial equipment. The majority of tires sold are replacement tire units, however, the company also sells tires directly to original equipment manufacturers of vehicles and machines where replacement tires are sold. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company operated its business through three operating segments representing its regional tire businesses: Americas; Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA); and Asia Pacific.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 7.17
GT's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
90% of the 1048 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 17.50 vs. GT: 7.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
GT' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.58  Med: 12.98 Max: 1025.33
Current: 7.17
2.58
1025.33
Forward PE Ratio 7.13
GT's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
68% of the 114 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 10.73 vs. GT: 7.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 7.17
GT's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
91% of the 1047 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 17.51 vs. GT: 7.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
GT' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.58  Med: 13.88 Max: 62.5
Current: 7.17
2.58
62.5
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 13.00
GT's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
71% of the 567 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 18.42 vs. GT: 13.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
GT' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.25  Med: 7.63 Max: 64.83
Current: 13
2.25
64.83
PB Ratio 1.67
GT's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
54% of the 1223 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.69 vs. GT: 1.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
GT' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 3.63 Max: 102.99
Current: 1.67
0.38
102.99
PS Ratio 0.56
GT's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 1239 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.86 vs. GT: 0.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
GT' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.26 Max: 0.63
Current: 0.56
0.05
0.63
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 24.40
GT's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
52% of the 440 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 15.46 vs. GT: 24.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
GT' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.55  Med: 13.59 Max: 34.78
Current: 24.4
2.55
34.78
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 6.15
GT's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
71% of the 592 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 9.12 vs. GT: 6.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
GT' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.58  Med: 5.62 Max: 118.57
Current: 6.15
1.58
118.57
EV-to-EBIT 9.58
GT's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
75% of the 1087 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 13.69 vs. GT: 9.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
GT' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -145.4  Med: 10 Max: 79.9
Current: 9.58
-145.4
79.9
EV-to-EBITDA 6.24
GT's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
78% of the 1129 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 10.32 vs. GT: 6.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
GT' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.5  Med: 6.1 Max: 100.2
Current: 6.24
3.5
100.2
EV-to-Revenue 0.91
GT's EV-to-Revenue is ranked higher than
56% of the 1255 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. GT: 0.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
GT' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.2  Med: 0.5 Max: 1
Current: 0.91
0.2
1
PEG Ratio 1.31
GT's PEG Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 618 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.52 vs. GT: 1.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
GT' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 1.03 Max: 14.75
Current: 1.31
0.21
14.75
Shiller PE Ratio 15.07
GT's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 302 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 24.71 vs. GT: 15.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
GT' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.77  Med: 23.49 Max: 74.64
Current: 15.07
13.77
74.64
Current Ratio 1.31
GT's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 1252 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.52 vs. GT: 1.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
GT' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.19  Med: 1.5 Max: 2.25
Current: 1.31
1.19
2.25
Quick Ratio 0.68
GT's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
76% of the 1252 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. GT: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
GT' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.61  Med: 0.86 Max: 1.62
Current: 0.68
0.61
1.62
Days Inventory 93.42
GT's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
74% of the 1225 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 55.99 vs. GT: 93.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
GT' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 64.01  Med: 73.79 Max: 93.42
Current: 93.42
64.01
93.42
Days Sales Outstanding 56.29
GT's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
60% of the 1044 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 62.89 vs. GT: 56.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
GT' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 42.6  Med: 45.58 Max: 57.66
Current: 56.29
42.6
57.66
Days Payable 91.92
GT's Days Payable is ranked higher than
72% of the 997 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 57.71 vs. GT: 91.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
GT' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 55.56  Med: 72.22 Max: 91.92
Current: 91.92
55.56
91.92

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.23
GT's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
71% of the 1389 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.97 vs. GT: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
GT' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 0.84 Max: 1.24
Current: 1.23
0.19
1.24
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.08
GT's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
98% of the 842 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.26 vs. GT: 0.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
GT' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.05 Max: 0.22
Current: 0.08
0.02
0.22
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 83.70
GT's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
98% of the 670 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 7.70 vs. GT: 83.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
GT' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -38.3 Max: 83.7
Current: 83.7
0
83.7
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.23
GT's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
74% of the 1362 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.97 vs. GT: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.23
GT's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
73% of the 1664 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 2.52 vs. GT: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
GT' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 0.84 Max: 1.24
Current: 1.23
0.19
1.24
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.50
GT's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
64% of the 603 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: -2.00 vs. GT: -0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
GT' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11  Med: -1.5 Max: -0.1
Current: -0.5
-11
-0.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 1.95
GT's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
55% of the 1184 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.88 vs. GT: 1.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
GT' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 2.15 Max: 511.9
Current: 1.95
0.47
511.9
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.73
GT's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
71% of the 649 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. GT: 1.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
GT' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 2.2 Max: 56.81
Current: 1.73
0.48
56.81
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 2.17
GT's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
87% of the 1192 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.22 vs. GT: 2.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
GT' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 1.13 Max: 3.59
Current: 2.17
0.24
3.59
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 1.10
GT's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
53% of the 392 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. GT: 1.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
GT' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 1.17 Max: 5.29
Current: 1.1
0.25
5.29
Price-to-Graham-Number 0.79
GT's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
70% of the 960 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.30 vs. GT: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
GT' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.54  Med: 1.14 Max: 29.05
Current: 0.79
0.54
29.05
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 10.44
GT's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
79% of the 1278 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 6.24 vs. GT: 10.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
GT' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9  Med: 9.5 Max: 17.5
Current: 10.44
-9
17.5
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 7.46
GT's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
58% of the 778 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 8.41 vs. GT: 7.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
GT' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -63.1  Med: 4.6 Max: 42.1
Current: 7.46
-63.1
42.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $14,973.00
EPS (TTM) $ 4.54
Beta1.72
Short Percentage of Float8.31%
52-Week Range $26.82 - 37.20
Shares Outstanding (Mil)251.76

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 15,179 15,420
EPS ($) 3.22 4.38
EPS without NRI ($) 3.22 4.38
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($) 0.40 0.40
» More Articles for NAS:GT

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Goodyear to Acquire Ventech Systems from Grenzebach Maschinenbau Sep 20 2017 
Goodyear and Case Western Reserve University Launch Shared Mobility Innovation Competition Sep 19 2017 
Goodyear Advances Connected-Business Model with Automated Tire Facility Sep 12 2017 
Goodyear Advances Connected-Business Model with Automated Tire Facility Sep 12 2017 
Goodyear Announces New Senior Leadership Roles Sep 07 2017 
Goodyear Expands Innovation Network to Silicon Valley Sep 01 2017 
Goodyear Using Soybean Oil-Based Rubber in Tires Aug 29 2017 
Goodyear Appoints Helsel as Chief Technology Officer Aug 17 2017 
Goodyear, United Steelworkers reach tentative labor agreement Jul 29 2017 
Goodyear to Announce Second Quarter 2017 Financial Results Jul 20 2017 

More From Other Websites
Featured Company News - Goodyear to Acquire Germany-based Tire Inspection Technology Firm Ventech... Sep 22 2017
See what the IHS Markit Score report has to say about Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. Sep 21 2017
Goodyear to Acquire Ventech Systems from Grenzebach Maschinenbau Sep 20 2017
Goodyear and Case Western Reserve University Launch Shared Mobility Innovation Competition Sep 19 2017
Top Gainers in the Consumer Sector: September 11–15, 2017 Sep 18 2017
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. – Value Analysis (NASDAQ:GT) : September 15, 2017 Sep 14 2017
Goodyear to Construct Facility for Premium Tire Production Sep 14 2017
Corporate News Blog - Goodyear Announces New Automated Tire Facility in Luxembourg to Advance its... Sep 14 2017
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : GT-US :... Sep 13 2017
[$$] Bribery: Doing deals with due diligence Sep 12 2017
Goodyear Advances Connected-Business Model with Automated Tire Facility Sep 12 2017
​Former P&G executive named president of Goodyear Tire Sep 12 2017
4 Must-Reads: Lithium Battery ETF Jumps 5% As China Embraces Electric Cars, N. Korea Sanctioned Sep 11 2017
This is Morgan Stanley’s top pick in autos, and it’s not Tesla Sep 11 2017
Goodyear Stock Insulated From Potential Electric Vehicle Dominance Sep 11 2017
Morgan Stanley thinks Goodyear is a good bet if you're worried about electric cars taking over the... Sep 11 2017
Best Stock in U.S. Autos? It's Not General Motors, Ford or Even Tesla. Sep 11 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}