Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt No Debt
NANO's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
98% of the 855 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.62 vs. NANO: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NANO' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 7.86 Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity-to-Asset 0.85
NANO's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
89% of the 852 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. NANO: 0.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NANO' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 0.81 Max: 0.93
Current: 0.85
0.63
0.93
Interest Coverage 350.61
NANO's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
62% of the 667 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 55.34 vs. NANO: 350.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NANO' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.27  Med: 26.56 Max: 350.61
Current: 350.61
5.27
350.61
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 10.50
Beneish M-Score: -1.69
WACC vs ROIC
12.69%
37.86%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 13.61
NANO's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
76% of the 853 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 5.72 vs. NANO: 13.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NANO' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -81.75  Med: -0.05 Max: 21.97
Current: 13.61
-81.75
21.97
Net Margin % 19.22
NANO's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
91% of the 853 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 4.67 vs. NANO: 19.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NANO' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -81.02  Med: -0.6 Max: 29.75
Current: 19.22
-81.02
29.75
ROE % 18.37
NANO's ROE % is ranked higher than
86% of the 837 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 5.98 vs. NANO: 18.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NANO' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -61.6  Med: -0.36 Max: 40.31
Current: 18.37
-61.6
40.31
ROA % 15.45
NANO's ROA % is ranked higher than
93% of the 862 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 3.09 vs. NANO: 15.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NANO' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -50  Med: -0.32 Max: 30.46
Current: 15.45
-50
30.46
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 34.31
NANO's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
80% of the 860 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 10.68 vs. NANO: 34.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NANO' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -101.32  Med: 0.73 Max: 48.27
Current: 34.31
-101.32
48.27
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 12.40
NANO's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
76% of the 784 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 2.80 vs. NANO: 12.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NANO' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.2  Med: 2.9 Max: 31.9
Current: 12.4
-16.2
31.9
GuruFocus has detected 1 Warning Sign with Nanometrics Inc NANO.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NANO's 30-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2018-02-07)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2016

NANO Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Joel Greenblatt 22,709 sh (+115.62%)
Jim Simons 749,500 sh (+50.02%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 76,782 sh (-0.32%)
Chuck Royce 1,846,681 sh (-8.96%)
» More
Q1 2017

NANO Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Joel Greenblatt 37,154 sh (+63.61%)
Jim Simons 923,600 sh (+23.23%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 79,404 sh (+3.41%)
Chuck Royce 1,434,947 sh (-22.30%)
» More
Q2 2017

NANO Guru Trades in Q2 2017

Jim Simons 1,011,500 sh (+9.52%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss Sold Out
Chuck Royce 1,227,979 sh (-14.42%)
Joel Greenblatt 8,021 sh (-78.41%)
» More
Q3 2017

NANO Guru Trades in Q3 2017

Paul Tudor Jones 12,118 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Jim Simons 983,100 sh (-2.81%)
Chuck Royce 1,185,379 sh (-3.47%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with NAS:NANO

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Joel Greenblatt 2017-09-30 Sold Out $24.64 - $28.6 $ 27.304%0
Joel Greenblatt 2017-06-30 Reduce -78.41%0.01%$24.89 - $32.2 $ 27.30-3%8,021
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2017-06-30 Sold Out $24.89 - $32.2 $ 27.30-3%0
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2017-03-31 Add 3.41%$24.84 - $30.46 $ 27.301%79,404
Joel Greenblatt 2017-03-31 Add 63.61%$24.84 - $30.46 $ 27.301%37,154
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 2016-12-31 Reduce -0.32%$19.65 - $25.83 $ 27.3019%76,782
Joel Greenblatt 2016-12-31 Add 115.62%0.01%$19.65 - $25.83 $ 27.3019%22,709
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
Premium More recent guru trades are included for USA Subscribe Members only!!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Semiconductors » Semiconductor Equipment & Materials    NAICS: 334413    SIC: 3829
Compare:LSE:OXIG, SHSE:603078, NAS:COHU, TPE:6271, LSE:IMG, NAS:ICHR, NAS:PLAB, XKRX:029460, TPE:2458, TSE:6256, NAS:UCTT, SZSE:300604, TSE:7970, HKSE:01385, NAS:NVMI, OSL:NOD, XTER:ELG, SZSE:300080, NAS:VECO, TSE:8155 » details
Traded in other countries:NNM.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Nanometrics Inc along with its subsidiaries provides process control metrology and inspection systems used in the fabrication of integrated circuits, high-brightness LEDs, discrete components and data storage devices.

Nanometrics Inc along with its subsidiaries provides process control metrology and inspection systems used in the fabrication of integrated circuits, high-brightness LEDs, discrete components and data storage devices.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 15.18
NANO's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
71% of the 595 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 22.64 vs. NANO: 15.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
NANO' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.02  Med: 15.92 Max: 1554
Current: 15.18
5.02
1554
Forward PE Ratio 16.84
NANO's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
50% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 17.73 vs. NANO: 16.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 15.18
NANO's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
71% of the 592 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 22.86 vs. NANO: 15.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
NANO' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.02  Med: 15.92 Max: 1554
Current: 15.18
5.02
1554
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 56.26
NANO's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
58% of the 377 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 22.39 vs. NANO: 56.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
NANO' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.45  Med: 20.7 Max: 74.06
Current: 56.26
8.45
74.06
PB Ratio 2.52
NANO's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 835 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 2.02 vs. NANO: 2.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
NANO' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 1.81 Max: 3.13
Current: 2.52
0.17
3.13
PS Ratio 2.94
NANO's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
71% of the 838 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.79 vs. NANO: 2.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
NANO' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.16  Med: 1.93 Max: 3.45
Current: 2.94
0.16
3.45
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 29.33
NANO's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
57% of the 380 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 21.04 vs. NANO: 29.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
NANO' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.85  Med: 17.73 Max: 3142
Current: 29.33
7.85
3142
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 26.13
NANO's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
60% of the 486 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 13.78 vs. NANO: 26.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
NANO' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.47  Med: 15.72 Max: 291.85
Current: 26.13
6.47
291.85
EV-to-EBIT 16.82
NANO's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
51% of the 597 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 17.61 vs. NANO: 16.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
NANO' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -98.8  Med: -0.1 Max: 419.5
Current: 16.82
-98.8
419.5
EV-to-EBITDA 13.87
NANO's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
54% of the 661 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 12.96 vs. NANO: 13.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
NANO' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -410.9  Med: 6.6 Max: 632.5
Current: 13.87
-410.9
632.5
EV-to-Revenue 2.32
NANO's EV-to-Revenue is ranked lower than
63% of the 843 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.80 vs. NANO: 2.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-Revenue only.
NANO' s EV-to-Revenue Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 1.5 Max: 3.1
Current: 2.32
0.1
3.1
Current Ratio 5.67
NANO's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
87% of the 855 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 2.23 vs. NANO: 5.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
NANO' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.44  Med: 5.24 Max: 14.82
Current: 5.67
2.44
14.82
Quick Ratio 4.35
NANO's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
85% of the 855 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.70 vs. NANO: 4.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
NANO' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.06  Med: 3.81 Max: 13.52
Current: 4.35
1.06
13.52
Days Inventory 150.14
NANO's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
82% of the 827 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 79.77 vs. NANO: 150.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
NANO' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 150.14  Med: 171.61 Max: 289.74
Current: 150.14
150.14
289.74
Days Sales Outstanding 62.86
NANO's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
57% of the 779 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 64.24 vs. NANO: 62.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
NANO' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 42.69  Med: 69.42 Max: 109.67
Current: 62.86
42.69
109.67
Days Payable 54.04
NANO's Days Payable is ranked lower than
58% of the 758 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 53.42 vs. NANO: 54.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
NANO' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 23.6  Med: 42.35 Max: 60.07
Current: 54.04
23.6
60.07

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -2.10
NANO's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
58% of the 616 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: -3.70 vs. NANO: -2.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
NANO' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.7  Med: -3.3 Max: 3.3
Current: -2.1
-14.7
3.3

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Cash 7.48
NANO's Price-to-Net-Cash is ranked higher than
57% of the 255 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 9.59 vs. NANO: 7.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Cash only.
NANO' s Price-to-Net-Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.2  Med: 8.99 Max: 75.53
Current: 7.48
1.2
75.53
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 3.44
NANO's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked higher than
61% of the 579 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 4.71 vs. NANO: 3.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
NANO' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 2.57 Max: 6.29
Current: 3.44
0.34
6.29
Price-to-Tangible-Book 2.66
NANO's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
62% of the 802 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 2.16 vs. NANO: 2.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
NANO' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 1.73 Max: 4.9
Current: 2.66
0.24
4.9
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 2.06
NANO's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
66% of the 465 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.62 vs. NANO: 2.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
NANO' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 1.92 Max: 6
Current: 2.06
0.35
6
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.53
NANO's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
72% of the 763 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.18 vs. NANO: 1.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
NANO' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.96 Max: 5.3
Current: 1.53
0.1
5.3
Price-to-Graham-Number 1.34
NANO's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
56% of the 546 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.56 vs. NANO: 1.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
NANO' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.46  Med: 1.46 Max: 9.48
Current: 1.34
0.46
9.48
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.93
NANO's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
66% of the 860 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 3.46 vs. NANO: 5.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
NANO' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1532.3  Med: -1 Max: 22.2
Current: 5.93
-1532.3
22.2
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -1.37
NANO's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
66% of the 384 Companies
in the Global Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 8.32 vs. NANO: -1.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
NANO' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.2  Med: -0.65 Max: 5.2
Current: -1.37
-10.2
5.2

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $239.58
EPS (TTM) $ 1.80
Beta1.72
Short Percentage of Float2.96%
52-Week Range $22.23 - 32.42
Shares Outstanding (Mil)25.59

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 258 289
EPS ($) 1.25 1.64
EPS without NRI ($) 1.25 1.64
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
12.00%
Dividends per Share ($)

Piotroski F-Score Details

Piotroski F-Score: 77
Positive ROAY
Positive CFROAY
Higher ROA yoyY
CFROA > ROAN
Lower Leverage yoyY
Higher Current Ratio yoyY
Less Shares Outstanding yoyN
Higher Gross Margin yoyY
Higher Asset Turnover yoyY

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)

GF Chat

{{numOfNotice}}